RCT文獻(xiàn)質(zhì)量評價(jià)

1、1會計(jì)學(xué)RCT文獻(xiàn)質(zhì)量評價(jià)文獻(xiàn)質(zhì)量評價(jià)嚴(yán)格文獻(xiàn)評價(jià) 證據(jù)的質(zhì)量表表 循循征征醫(yī)醫(yī)學(xué)學(xué)證證據(jù)據(jù)分分級級水水平平及及依依據(jù)據(jù) 推推薦薦分分級級 治治療療、預(yù)預(yù)防防、病病因因的的證證據(jù)據(jù) A A 高高質(zhì)質(zhì)量量 R RC CT Ts s 的的系系統(tǒng)統(tǒng)綜綜述述 B B 單單個(gè)個(gè)大大樣樣本本 R RC CT T C C 未未使使用用 R RC CT T 但但設(shè)設(shè)計(jì)計(jì)很很好好的的隊(duì)隊(duì)列列研研究究、病病例例- -對對照照研研究究或或無無對對照照的的系系列列病病例例觀觀察察 D D 專專家家個(gè)個(gè)人人意意見見、個(gè)個(gè)例例報(bào)報(bào)告告 隱蔽分組（分配隱藏）和盲法的概念、實(shí)施與報(bào)告 吳泰相 劉關(guān)鍵中國循證醫(yī)學(xué)雜志, 200

2、7, 7(3): 222225.EntryEntryJudgementJudgementDescriptionDescriptionAdequate sequence generation?Yes.Quote: “patients were randomly allocated.”Comment: Probably done, since earlier reports from the same investigators clearly describe use of random sequences (Cartwright 1980).Allocation concealment?No.

3、Quote: “.using a table of random numbers.”Comment: Probably not done.Blinding? (Patient-reported outcomes)Yes.Quote: “double blind, double dummy”; “High and low dose tablets or capsules were indistinguishable in all aspects of their outward appearance. For each drug an identically matched placebo wa

4、s available (the success of blinding was evaluated by examining the drugs before distribution).”Comment: Probably done.Blinding? (Mortality)Yes.Obtained from medical records; review authors do not believe this will introduce bias.Incomplete outcome data addressed? (Short-term outcomes (2-6 wks)No.4

5、weeks: 17/110 missing from intervention group (9 due to lack of efficacy); 7/113 missing from control group (2 due to lack of efficacy).Incomplete outcome data addressed? (Longer-term outcomes (6 wks)No.12 weeks: 31/110 missing from intervention group; 18/113 missing from control group. Reasons differ across groups.Free of selective reporting?No.Three rating scales for cognition listed in Methods, but