考研英語二試題及答案(同名)_第1頁(yè)
考研英語二試題及答案(同名)_第2頁(yè)
考研英語二試題及答案(同名)_第3頁(yè)
考研英語二試題及答案(同名)_第4頁(yè)
考研英語二試題及答案(同名)_第5頁(yè)
已閱讀5頁(yè),還剩3頁(yè)未讀, 繼續(xù)免費(fèi)閱讀

下載本文檔

版權(quán)說明:本文檔由用戶提供并上傳,收益歸屬內(nèi)容提供方,若內(nèi)容存在侵權(quán),請(qǐng)進(jìn)行舉報(bào)或認(rèn)領(lǐng)

文檔簡(jiǎn)介

1、2015 考 研 英 語 (二) 試 題Section I Use of EnglishDirections:Read the following text 。Choose the best word(s)for each numbered blank and markA , B, C or D on ANSWER SHEET 1(10 points)In our contemporary culture , the prospect of communicating with-or even looking ata stranger is virtually unbearable Every

2、one around us seems to agree by the way they fiddle with their phones , even without a 1 undergroundIt ' s a sad realityour desire to avoid interacting with other human beings because there 2 ' sto be gained from talki ng to the strange r standing by you. But you wouldn,3,inknowuit phone. Th

3、is universal armor sends the4: " Please don ' t approach me. ”What is it that makes us feel we need to hide 5 our screens?One answer is fear, according to Jon Wortmann, executive mental coach We fear rejection , or that our innocent social advances will be 6 as “ creep, " We fear we 7

4、IIWe fear we 'II be disruptive Strangers are inherently8 to us, so we are more likely to feel 9 when communicating with them compared with our friends and acquaintances To avoid this anxiety, we 10 to our phones. " Phones become our security blankeWortmann says. " They are our happy gl

5、asses that protect us from what we perceive is going to be more 11 .”But once we rip off the bandaid , tuck our smartphones in our pockets and look up , it doesn 12 t so bad. In one 2011 experiment, behavioral scientists Nicholas Epley and Juliana Schroeder asked commuters to do the unthinkable: Sta

6、rt a 13. They had Chicago train commuters talk to their fellow 14 . "When Dr.Epley and Ms. Schroeder asked other people in the same train station to 15 how they would feel after talking to a stranger, the commuters thought their 16 would be more pleasant if they sat on their own," the New

7、York Times summarizes. Though the participants didn't expect a positive experience, after they 17 with the experiment, "not a single person reported having been snubbed.”18 , these commutes were reportedly more enjoyable compared with those sans communication, which makes absolute sense, 19

8、 human beings thrive off of social connections. It's that 20 : Talking to strangers can make you feel connected.1. A ticketB permitCsignallD record2. A nothingB linkCanotherD much3. A beatenB guidedCpluggedD brought4. A messageBcedeCnoticeD sign5. A underBbeyondC behindD from6. A misinterpreteB

9、misappliedC misadjustedD mismatched7. A firedB judgedC replacedD delayed8. A unreasonableB ungreatfulC unconventionalD unfamiliar9. A comfortableB anxiousC confidentD angry10. A attendB pointC takeDturn11. A dangerousB mysteriousC violentD boring12. A hurtB resisC bendD decay13. A lectureB conversat

10、ionC debateD negotiation14. A traineesB employeesC researchersD passengers15. A revealBchooseC predictlD design16. A voyageB flightC walkD ride17. A went throughB did awayCcaught upD put up18. A In turnB In particularCIn factD In consequence19. A unlessB sinceC ifD whereas20. A funnyB simpleC Iogica

11、lD rareSection n Reading ComprehensionPart ADirections:Text 1A new study suggests that contrary to most surveys. People art actually more stressed at home than at work. Researchers measured peoples cortn tlol. Which is it at stress marker. While they were at work and while they were at home and foun

12、d it higher at what is supposed to be a place of refuge.“Further contradicting conventional wisdom, we found that women as well as men have lower levels of stress at work than at home, “ writes one of the researchers. Sarah Damaske, In fact women say they feel better at work. She notes. men not wome

13、n. Who report being bappicr at home than at work,“ Another surprise is that the findibgsihold true forthose with childrcn and without, but more so for nonparents. This is why pcoplc who work outside the home have better health.What the study doesn ' t measure is whether people are still doing wo

14、rk when they' re at home, whetlwork or work brought home from the office. For many men, the end of the workday is a time to kick back. For women who stay home, they never get to leave the office. And for women who work outside the home, they often are playing catch-up-with-household tasks. With

15、the blurring of roles, and the fact that the home front lags well behind the workplace in making adjustments for working women, it' s not surprising that women are more stressed at home.But it ' s not just a gender thing. At work, people pretty much knowhat they ' re supposed to be doing

16、: working, making money, doing the tasks they have to do in order to draw an income. The bargain is very pure: Employee puts in hours of physical or mental labor and employee draws out life-sustaining moola.On the home front, however, people have no such clarity. Rare is the household in which the d

17、ivision of labor is so clinically and methodically laid out. There are a lot of tasks to be done, there are inadequate rewards for most of them. Your home colleagues-your family- have no clear rewards for their labor; they need to be talked into it, or if they threatened with complete removal of all

18、 electronic devices. Plus, they' re your family. You cannot fire you門never really get to go home from home.So it ' s not surprising that people are more stressed at home. Not only are the tasks apparently infinite, the-coorkers are much harder to motivate.21 .According to Pa ragraph 1 , most

19、 previous su rveys found that homeAwas an un realistic place for relaxationBgenerated more stress than the workplaceCwas an ideal place for stress measurementDoffered greater relaxation than the workplace22 .According to Damaske , who are likely to be the happiest at home?AWorking mothersBChildless

20、husbandsC Childless wivesDWorking fathers23 The blurring of working women's roles refers to the fact thayAthey are both bread winners and housewivesBtheir home is also a place for kicking backCthere is often much housework left behindDit is difficult for them to leave their office24 .The word “

21、moola ” (LjneWa 4)most probably meansAenergyBskillsCearningsDnutrition25 .The home front differs from the workplace in thatAhome is hardly a cozier working environment Bdivision of labor at home is seldom clear-cut ©household tasks are generally more motivating Dfamily labor is often adequately

22、 rewardedText 2For years, studies have found that first-generation college students-those who do not have a parent with a college degree-lag other students on a range of education achievement factors. Their grades are lower and their dropout rates are higher. But since such students are most likely

23、to advance economically if they succeed in higher education, colleges and than close " achievement gap based on social class, according to the depressing beginning of a paper forthcoming in the journal Psychological Sciense.universities have pushed for decades to recruit more of them. This has

24、created students, but then watching many of them fail, means that higher education hasa parrat ion in that recontideed rtothiep roduce <But the article is actually quite optimistic, as it outlines a potential solution to this problem, suggesting that an approach(which involves a one-hour, next-to

25、-no-cost program) can close 63 percent of the achievement gap(measured by such factors as grades)between first-generation and other students.The authors of the paper are from different universities, and their findins are based on a study involving 147 students(who completed the project)at an unnamed

26、 private unive rsity . First generation was defined as not having a parent with a fou r-year college degree Most of the first-generation students(59.1 percent) were recipients of Pell Grants , a federal g rant for undergraduates with financial need , while this was true only for 8.6 percent of the s

27、tudents wit at least one parent with a four-year degreeTheir thesis-that a relatively modest inte rvention could have a big impact-was based on the view that first-gene ration students may be most lacking not in potential but in practical knowledge about how to deal with the issues that face most co

28、llege students They cite past resea rch by several authors to show that this is the gap that must be na rrowed to close the achievement gap.Many first- gene ration students " struggle to navigate the-omssleulture of higher education , learn the 'rules of the game, ' and take advantage o

29、f college resou rces," they write And this becomes more of a problem when collages doabout the class advantage and disadvantages of different groups of students Because US colleges and universities seldom acknowledge how social class can affect students' edincationBaeypestegene ration stude

30、nts lack sight aboutwhy they a re struggling and do not unde rstand how students' like them can improve26 . Recruiting more first-generation students hasAreduced their d ropout ratesBnarrowed the achievement gaoC missed its original pu rposeDdepressed college students27 The author of the researc

31、h article are optimistic becauseAthe problem is solvableBtheir approach is costlessq the recruiting rate has increasedDtheir finding appeal to students28 The study suggests that most first-gene ration studentsAstudy at private universitiesBare from single-pa rent familiesq are in need of financial s

32、upportDhave failed their collage29 . The author of the paper believe that first-generation studentsAa re actually indifferent to the achievement gapBcan have a potential influence on othe r studentsC may lack opportunities to apply for resea rch projectsDare inexperienced in handling their issues at

33、 college30.We mayinfer from the last paragraph thatAuniversities often rect the culture of the middle-class Bstudents are usually to blame for their lack of resources Csocial class g reatly helps en rich educational experiences Dcolleges are partly responsible for the problem in question Text3Even i

34、n traditional offices , “the lingua franca of corporate America has gottenmuch more emotional and much more right-brained than it was 20 years ago , " said Ha rva rd Business School professor Nancy Koehn She sta rted spinning off examples. "If you and I pa rachuted back to Fortune 500 comp

35、anies in 1990 we would see much less frequent use of terms like Journey, mission,passion. There were goals , there were strategies , there were objectives , but we didn ' t talk about energy; we didn ' t talk about passion. ”Koehn pointed out that this new era of corporate vocabula ry is ver

36、y-oriented-and not bteaincidence." Let ' sforget sDorts-in male-dominated corporate America , it ' s still a big deal. It' s not explicitly conscioidsea that I 'coach, and you ' re my teamand we ' re in this togethec. There are lots and lots of CEOs in very different com

37、panies, but most think of themselves as coaches and this is their team and they want to win".These terms a re also intended to infuse work with meaning-and , as Khu rana points out , increase allegiance to the firm. "Yhave the importation of terminology that historically used to be associa

38、ted with non-profit organizations and religious organizations : Terms like vision , values, passion, and purpose, “ saidKhuranaThis new focus on personal fulfillment can help keep employees motivated amid increasingly loud debates over work- life balance The “ mommy wars“ of the 1990s a re still goi

39、ng oy , tpidampting arguments about why women still can't have it all and books like Sheryl Sandberg's Lean In , whose title has become a buzzword in its own right. Terms like unplug , offline , life-hack , bandwidth , and capacity are all about setting boundaries between the office and the

40、home But if your work is your “ passion, " you ' II be more likely to devote yourself even if that means going home for dinner and then working long after the kids are in bedBut this seems to be the irony of office speak : Everyone makes fun of it , but manage rs love it, companies depend o

41、n it, and regular people willingly absorb it As Nunberg said ,“ You can get people to think it' s nonsense attthe same tiryou buy into it. " In a workplace that ' s fundamentally indiffe rentdotyoue afeng office speak can help you figu re out how you relate to your work-and how your wor

42、k defines who you are 31. According to Nancy Koehn, office language has become Amore e motional Bmore objective Cless energetic Dless energetic Eless strategic 32. “teanoriented corporate vocabulary is closely related to Ahistorical incidents Bgender difference Csports culture Dathletic executives 3

43、3.Khurana believes that the importation of terminology aims to Arevive historical terms Bpromote company image Cfoster corporate cooperation Dstrengthen employee loyalty 34.It can be inferred that Lean In Avoices for working women Bappeals to passionate workaholics Ctriggers dcbates among mommies Dp

44、raises motivated employees35.Which of the following statements is true about office speak?AManagers admire it but avoid itBLinguists believe it to be nonsenseCCompanies find it to be fundamental DRegular people mock it but accept it Text 4Many people talked of the 288,000 new jobs the Labor Departme

45、nt reporled for Jure, along with the drop in the unemployment take to 6 J percent. at good news. And they were right. For now it appears the economy is creating jobs at a decent pace. We still have a long way to go to get back to full employment, but at least we are now finally moving forward at a f

46、aster pace.However there is another important part of the jobs picture that was targely ovedookcd. There was a big jump in the number of people who report voluntarily working part-time. This figure is now 830,000(4,4 percent) above its year agolevel.Before explaining the connection to the Obamacare,

47、 it is worth making an important distinction. Many people who work part-time jobs actually want full-time jobs. They take part-time work because this is all they can get. An increase in involuntary part-time work is evidence of weakness in the labor market and it means that many people will be havin

48、g a very hard time making ends meet.There was an increase in involuntary part-time in June, but the general direction has been down. Involuntary part-time employment is still far higher than before the recession, but it is down by 640,000(7.9 percent)from its year ago level.We know the difference be

49、tween voluntary and involuntary part-time employment because people tell us. The survey used by the Labor Department asks people if they worked less than 35 hours in the reference week. If the answer is "yes. " they are classified as working p-tritne. The survey then asks whether they work

50、ed less than 35 hours in that week because they wanted to work less than full time or because they had no choice. They are only elassified as voluntary part-time workers if they tell the survey taker they chose to work less than 35 hours a week.The issue of voluntary part-time relates to Obamacare b

51、ecanse one of the main purposes was to allow people to get insurance outside of employment. For many people, especially those with serious health conditions or family members with serious health conditions, before Obamacare the only way to get insurance was through a job that provided health insuran

52、ce.However, Obamacare has allowed more than 12 million people to either get insurance through Medicaid or the exchanges. These are people who may previously have felt the need to get a full-time job that provided insurance in order to cover themselves and their families. With Obamacare there is no l

53、onger a link between employment and insurance.36. Which part of the jobs picture was neglected?A. The prospect of a thriving job market.B. The increase of voluntary part-time jobs.C. The possibility of full employment.D. The acceleration of job creation.37. Many people work part-time because theyA.

54、prefer part-time jobs to full-time jobsB. feel that is enough to make ends meetC. cannot get their hands on full-time jobsD. haven' t seen the weakness of the market38. Involuntary part-time employment in the USA. is harder to acquire than one year agoB. shows a general tendency of declineC. sat

55、isfies the real need of the joblessD. is lower than before the recession39. It can be learned that with Obamacare, .A. it is no longer easy for part-timers to get insuranceB. employment is no longer a precondition to get insuranceC. it is still challenging to get insurance for family membersD. full-

56、time employment is still essential for insurance40. The text mainly discusses.A employment in the USB part-timer classificationC insurance through MedicaidD Obamacare ' s troublePart BDirections:In the following text, some sentences have been removed. For Questions 41-45, choose the most suitabl

57、e one from the list A-G to fit into each of the numbered blank. There are two extra choices, which do not fit in any of the gaps. Mark your answers on ANSWER SHEET. (10 points)E You are not aloneF Don ' t fear responsibility for your lifeG Pave your own unique pathH Most of your fears are unreal

58、I Think about the present momentJ Experience helps you growK There are many things to be grateful forSome Old Truths to Help You Overcome Toucgh TimesUefortunately, life is not a bed of roses, We are going through life facing sad experiences. Moreover, we are grieving various kinds of loss: a friendship, a rontantic relatlonshlp of a house. Hard times may hold you down at what usually seems like the most inopportune t

溫馨提示

  • 1. 本站所有資源如無特殊說明,都需要本地電腦安裝OFFICE2007和PDF閱讀器。圖紙軟件為CAD,CAXA,PROE,UG,SolidWorks等.壓縮文件請(qǐng)下載最新的WinRAR軟件解壓。
  • 2. 本站的文檔不包含任何第三方提供的附件圖紙等,如果需要附件,請(qǐng)聯(lián)系上傳者。文件的所有權(quán)益歸上傳用戶所有。
  • 3. 本站RAR壓縮包中若帶圖紙,網(wǎng)頁(yè)內(nèi)容里面會(huì)有圖紙預(yù)覽,若沒有圖紙預(yù)覽就沒有圖紙。
  • 4. 未經(jīng)權(quán)益所有人同意不得將文件中的內(nèi)容挪作商業(yè)或盈利用途。
  • 5. 人人文庫(kù)網(wǎng)僅提供信息存儲(chǔ)空間,僅對(duì)用戶上傳內(nèi)容的表現(xiàn)方式做保護(hù)處理,對(duì)用戶上傳分享的文檔內(nèi)容本身不做任何修改或編輯,并不能對(duì)任何下載內(nèi)容負(fù)責(zé)。
  • 6. 下載文件中如有侵權(quán)或不適當(dāng)內(nèi)容,請(qǐng)與我們聯(lián)系,我們立即糾正。
  • 7. 本站不保證下載資源的準(zhǔn)確性、安全性和完整性, 同時(shí)也不承擔(dān)用戶因使用這些下載資源對(duì)自己和他人造成任何形式的傷害或損失。

評(píng)論

0/150

提交評(píng)論