如何提高新GRE的閱讀速度

1、如何提高新GRE的閱讀速度來(lái)源: 互聯(lián)網(wǎng) 時(shí)間: 2011年10月28日 內(nèi)容提要：新gre考試全面機(jī)考第三場(chǎng)已經(jīng)結(jié)束，據(jù)研究屏幕閱讀就別紙上閱讀速度慢25%，如何提高新gre考試閱讀速度呢?綜合整理一下幾種方法，希望能給以后參加新gre考試的考生提供幫助。 1.先過(guò)了單詞關(guān)。 不用文章所有單詞都認(rèn)識(shí)。甚至要盡量保持文章中一些名詞不認(rèn)識(shí)，這樣可以去猜，練習(xí)猜詞的能力，畢竟考試中肯定會(huì)有詞不認(rèn)識(shí)，要根據(jù)上下文推測(cè)下。但是一些重要的形容詞，名詞，動(dòng)詞還是要認(rèn)識(shí)的，因?yàn)檫@些詞反映了作者的態(tài)度和文章的轉(zhuǎn)折啊之類(lèi)的結(jié)構(gòu)。而且對(duì)這些詞要很熟練，一看到就能反應(yīng)過(guò)來(lái)是褒義還是貶義，不能反應(yīng)個(gè)半天的大家可以去背

2、下閱讀39+3后面的那個(gè)生詞表，然后自己平時(shí)坐閱讀時(shí)對(duì)于重要的可以推理作者態(tài)度的詞也總結(jié)背下來(lái)。2.每天練習(xí)下長(zhǎng)難句每天都看看楊鵬的長(zhǎng)難句，不要看答案，自己盡量分析，用他的方法。每看完一句長(zhǎng)難句，都做一下他的意群訓(xùn)練，這個(gè)對(duì)提高閱讀速度非常非常有幫助，看長(zhǎng)難句最好每天都看一個(gè)小時(shí)，可以增加預(yù)感，也破除了對(duì)閱讀的恐懼感，看的同時(shí)做意群訓(xùn)練可以增加閱讀速度。有老師說(shuō)，看了長(zhǎng)難句，做題會(huì)影響效果(因?yàn)殚L(zhǎng)難句都是閱讀中的句子，再看閱讀會(huì)發(fā)現(xiàn)輕松多，因?yàn)樽铍y的句子都讀過(guò)了其實(shí)我覺(jué)得還好吧，一些新g的閱讀，很多都沒(méi)有收錄到長(zhǎng)難句中。3.速度訓(xùn)練讀gre邏輯框架：很多教材都介紹了很多閱讀把握邏輯框架的技巧，

3、比如not only后的跳過(guò)，but also后的重點(diǎn)讀，however后的要重點(diǎn)度之類(lèi)的。我想大家不能盲目記這些技巧，最好要自己親手總結(jié)，適合自己的，畢竟很多時(shí)候gre細(xì)節(jié)題考的都是一些要”跳過(guò)的“插入語(yǔ)，或者for example之后的東西。如果讀的時(shí)候直接跳過(guò)了，就會(huì)有問(wèn)題。其實(shí)這個(gè)讀重點(diǎn)的方法是非常好的，however，不應(yīng)該那么死記硬背的去用，要通過(guò)自己的總結(jié)，去形成一種直覺(jué)，什么后面的該讀，什么后面的該快速掃過(guò)。大家可以在剛開(kāi)始讀文章時(shí)，細(xì)細(xì)的讀每句話(huà)，讀完后，理解了整篇文章，腦子里默想下文章的框架和主旨，是什么觀點(diǎn)，是怎么論證的，有哪些重要的證據(jù)和性質(zhì)，老觀點(diǎn)弱在哪兒，等等。然后

4、回過(guò)頭去，劃出你認(rèn)為是非讀不可，不讀就理解不了文章主旨的。而且只要讀劃下文字，就能達(dá)到同樣快速理解文章主旨的效果。然后再做下一篇，劃下一篇。等做了十篇左右，就會(huì)發(fā)現(xiàn)劃出的文字越來(lái)越少了，自己也慢慢清楚了gre的文章套路，哪些是會(huì)考的，哪些可以忽略舉個(gè)例子：一般反駁老觀點(diǎn)的文章，看到第一個(gè)詞many people，就可以?huà)哌^(guò)這句找however了，因?yàn)閔owever肯定是指出他的不足和他對(duì)比，通過(guò)however的觀點(diǎn)，腦子里就可以推出many people 的觀點(diǎn)，這樣就可以?huà)哌^(guò)不少內(nèi)容。一定要邊讀邊動(dòng)腦子，而不是盲目的吸收信息。大家都知道新gre是邏輯考試，不是簡(jiǎn)答的語(yǔ)言考試，不要用做中學(xué)英語(yǔ)

5、閱讀的那套。如果閱讀中遇到讀不懂的長(zhǎng)難句，就仔細(xì)破解，找主謂賓，靜下心來(lái)慢慢破解個(gè)一小時(shí)，一句話(huà)總看得懂吧。這樣把握了結(jié)構(gòu)做題的時(shí)候，遇到主旨題，細(xì)節(jié)題，作者態(tài)度題就直接秒殺了，不用回去看文章。然后遇到細(xì)節(jié)題，回去快速定位找下，畢竟文章理解了，定位就很快?，F(xiàn)在新gre考試，閱讀都很短，作者很難鋪開(kāi)寫(xiě)，所以邏輯非常清晰，這樣做就很適合，練習(xí)的時(shí)候，每做完一篇閱讀，就先心里默想下新gre考試邏輯結(jié)構(gòu)，用最短的話(huà)概括下，再去做題。4.最后就是漫長(zhǎng)的卡時(shí)間訓(xùn)練可以從每篇文章6分鐘，5分鐘，4分鐘根據(jù)個(gè)人情況一步步的訓(xùn)練。慢慢扔掉一些以前覺(jué)得一定要讀的，因?yàn)闆](méi)有那么多時(shí)間。根據(jù)每篇文章分配的時(shí)間，來(lái)有取

6、舍的讀，每篇短閱讀2分鐘讀完，能讀多少是多少，但是要把文章讀完，而不是很細(xì)的讀了前三句，后三句根本沒(méi)看。要宏觀的讀下全文。文章把握住邏輯結(jié)構(gòu)，觀點(diǎn)即可，細(xì)節(jié)不要太深究，加快節(jié)奏。5.體會(huì)下閱讀和arg的關(guān)系閱讀和arg很像，確實(shí)是這樣，大家把一片閱讀簡(jiǎn)化后，發(fā)現(xiàn)就是一篇arg，作者舉了一堆證據(jù)妄圖證明一個(gè)觀點(diǎn)，駁斥其他觀點(diǎn)而新g中很流行的 題型，比如怎么怎么樣會(huì)support，或者undermine作者觀點(diǎn)，其實(shí)就是arg中找反例，找邏輯錯(cuò)誤的過(guò)程這樣去解題就簡(jiǎn)單多了。只是我們思考的方式不同，看arg下意識(shí)的去找錯(cuò)，看閱讀下意識(shí)的相信作者，所以往往會(huì)反應(yīng)不過(guò)來(lái)。改革后的新gre考試，取消了原來(lái)

7、的“類(lèi)反”部分，題目類(lèi)型也變得多樣化了，更加加強(qiáng)和強(qiáng)調(diào)了對(duì)邏輯推理的考察還有詞匯要求更加高。但是作為一個(gè)標(biāo)準(zhǔn)化的測(cè)試，出題的原則還是萬(wàn)變不離其宗的，只要同學(xué)們保持好心態(tài)，多加練習(xí)，增強(qiáng)新gre考試閱讀邏輯推理能力。GRE寫(xiě)作argument全部官方范文分析(3日期：2011-02-12來(lái)源：新航道加入收藏 范文分析第一篇文章Hospital statistics regarding people who go to the emergency room after rollerskating accidents indicate the need for more protective equ

8、ipment. Within this group of people, 75 percent of those who had accidents in streets or parking lots were not wearing any protective clothing (helmets, knee pads, etc. or any light-reflecting material (clip-on lights, glow-in-the-dark wrist pads, etc. Clearly, these statistics indicate that by inve

9、sting in high-quality protective gear and reflective equipment, rollerskaters will greatly reduce their risk of being severely injured in an accident.原題邏輯順序?yàn)椋簲?shù)據(jù)顯示了對(duì)保護(hù)裝備的需求=展開(kāi)說(shuō)明這個(gè)數(shù)據(jù)是怎樣顯示這樣的需求的(即用這個(gè)裝備有什么效果=結(jié)論：為了達(dá)到這個(gè)效果我們應(yīng)該重金買(mǎi)這保護(hù)設(shè)備。Benchmark 6The notion that protective gear reduces the injuries suffered

10、 in accidents seems at first glance to be an obvious conclusion. After all, it is the intent of these products to either prevent accidents from occuring in the first place or to reduce the injuries suffered by the wearer should an accident occur. 前兩句首先肯定了原命題中值得肯定的地方。這是求同存異的表現(xiàn)。注意這里第一句作者同意原命題的同時(shí)，在第二句緊

11、接著就給出了展開(kāi)的證明。而沒(méi)有光是羅列觀點(diǎn)。However, the conclusion that investing in high quality protective gear greatly reduces the risk of being severely injured in an accident may mask other (and potentially more significant causes of injuries and may inspire people to over invest financially and psychologically in

12、protective gear. 再說(shuō)原命題是存在邏輯漏洞的，即它因。這里并沒(méi)有展開(kāi)論證，因?yàn)檫@是全文的中心句，整個(gè)文章都在后面給予論證。同時(shí)，最后半句給出了論據(jù)中的潛在后果。來(lái)源：新航道官網(wǎng)中國(guó)最好的英語(yǔ)培訓(xùn)機(jī)構(gòu)First of all, as mentioned in the argument, there are two distinct kinds of gear - preventative gear (such as light reflecting material and protective gear (such as helmets. body打頭第一段是屬于攻擊總前提假設(shè)

13、的，作者認(rèn)為這個(gè)(即保護(hù)性設(shè)備和防護(hù)性設(shè)備的差別是有必要在討論一切之前弄清楚的。論證方法為質(zhì)疑假設(shè)，加條件后討論，提出建議。實(shí)際上，這個(gè)前提對(duì)應(yīng)的就是開(kāi)頭段的前兩句話(huà)。深層的含義就是，盡管我在開(kāi)頭對(duì)你的某一個(gè)部分作了讓步似的同意，但是這個(gè)同意也是建立在一定的假設(shè)基礎(chǔ)上的，要是這個(gè)假設(shè)搞不清楚，哼哼我讓不讓步還不一定呢!本段就來(lái)討論這個(gè)假設(shè)基礎(chǔ)。Preventative gear is intended to warn others, presumably for the most part motorists, of the presence of the roller skater. It

14、works only if the "other" is a responsible and caring individual who will afford the skater the necessary space and attention. Protective gear is intended to reduce the effect of any accident, whether it is caused by an other, the skater or some force of nature. Protective gear does little

15、, if anything, to prevent accidents but is presumed to reduce the injuries that occur in an accident. 這兩句分別從兩個(gè)方面進(jìn)行了論述，為本段第一句話(huà)的論證進(jìn)行服務(wù)，每一方面的具體方法是先定義，再比較。論證方法為加上不同的條件后進(jìn)行討論，比如前一句話(huà)假定只有防護(hù)性裝備會(huì)怎樣，后一句話(huà)假定只有保護(hù)性裝備會(huì)怎么樣。The statistics on injuries suffered by skaters would be more interesting if the skaters were g

16、rouped into those wearing no gear at all, those wearing protective gear only, those wearing preventative gear only and those wearing both. 這里提出了作者的建議，即如何通過(guò)進(jìn)一步的完善使原命題更加的有力。These statistics could provide skaters with a clearer understanding of which kinds of gear are more beneficial. 如果這個(gè)問(wèn)題(保護(hù)防護(hù)設(shè)備的差別解

17、決了后面的討論才能繼續(xù)。所以說(shuō)，總的來(lái)說(shuō)這一段是討論了原文一個(gè)核心的前提。轉(zhuǎn)載自:考試大 - Examda.ComThe argument above is weakened by the fact that it does not take into account the inherent differences between skaters who wear gear and those who do not.從本段起，連著的三個(gè)自然段就是按照原文邏輯鏈的順序進(jìn)行攻擊和質(zhì)疑。實(shí)際上，這三段對(duì)應(yīng)的就是開(kāi)頭段的however之后的話(huà)。本段先質(zhì)疑了人的本質(zhì)的差異。論證方法是加條件后討論。If

18、 is at least likely that those who wear gear may be generally more responsible and/or safety conscious individuals. The skaters who wear gear may be less likely to cause accidents through careless or dangerous behavior. It may, in fact, be their natural caution and responsibility that keeps them out

19、 of the emergency room rather than the gear itself.以上三句話(huà)展開(kāi)證明第一個(gè)分支觀點(diǎn)，論證方法就是大名鼎鼎的三段論。加入常識(shí)性條件。即本身很注意安全的人配戴保護(hù)裝置=配戴裝置后就能少出事故=故本身注意安全才使得少出事故。 Also, the statistic above is based entirely on those who are skating in streets and parking lots which are relatively dangerous places to skate in the first place.

20、People who are generally more safety conscious (and therefore more likely to wear gear may choose to skate in safer areas such as parks or back yards. 以上兩句展開(kāi)證明第二個(gè)分支觀點(diǎn)，論證方法同樣為大名鼎鼎的三段論，加上常識(shí)性條件。即街道公園本身不太安全=本身注意安全的人會(huì)選擇安全的地方=來(lái)這里的人都是本身不太注意安全的。這里最后一點(diǎn)是我給補(bǔ)充上的，原文沒(méi)有論證完全，但是基本的框架還是有的。The statistic also goes not

21、differentiate between severity of injuries.攻擊邏輯鏈的第二步，受傷的程度沒(méi)有說(shuō)清。這里的論證方法核心是質(zhì)疑隱含假設(shè)，加條件后討論。 The conclusion that safety gear prevents severe injuries suggests that it is presumed that people come to the emergency room only with severe injuries. 指出原隱含假設(shè)。This is certainly not the case.指出它錯(cuò)了。 Also, given th

22、at skating is a recreational activity that may be primarily engaged in during evenings and weekends (when doctors' offices are closed, skater with less severe injuries may be especially likely to come to the emergency room for treatment. 加上人們晚上去滑的人多這個(gè)條件后討論，最終削弱原命題。Finally, there is absolutely no

23、 evidence provided that high quality (and presumably more expensive gear is any more beneficial than other kinds of gear.攻擊邏輯聯(lián)的第三步，質(zhì)量好的不一定有用。核心論證方法為列舉它因和提出建議。 For example, a simple white t-shirt may provide the same preventative benefit as a higher quality, more expensive, shirt designed only for sk

24、ating.簡(jiǎn)單的t-shirt也能很有用。 Before skaters are encouraged to invest heavily in gear, a more complete understanding of the benefit provided by individual pieces of gear would be helpful.建議我們對(duì)器材考慮得更加全面些。The argument for safety gear based on emergency room statistics could provide important information and

25、potentially saves lives.強(qiáng)調(diào)原文的初衷還是很好的，就好像兩個(gè)人在那里辯論，范文把原文給說(shuō)急了，范文怕原文不高興了，就再哄哄他：別看我罵了這么多，你的初衷還是好的嘛!值得肯定。 Before conclusions about the amount and kinds of investments that should be made in gear are reached, however, a more complete understanding of the benefits are needed. 范文看原文也不怎么哭了，于是最終還是委婉的表達(dá)了自己的建議。A

26、fter all, a false confidence in ineffective gear could be just as dangerous as no gear at all. 最后補(bǔ)充論證自己的建議：論證方法為反證法。同時(shí)范文在最后嚇唬一嚇原文，告訴他不這樣做的可怕的后果。Reader Comment on 6This outstanding response demonstrates the writer's insightful analytical skills.The introduction, which notes that adopting the prom

27、pt's fallacious reasoning could ".inspire people to over invest financially and psychologically in protective gear," is followed by a comprehensive examination of each of the argument's root flaws. Specifically, the writer exposes several points that undermine the argument:*that pr

28、eventive and protective gear are not the same*that skaters who wear gear may be less prone to accidents because they are, by nature, more responsible and cautious*that the statistics do not differentiate by the severity of the injuries*that gear may not need to be high-quality to be beneficialThe di

29、scussion is smoothly and logically organized, and each point is thoroughly and cogently developed. In addition, the writing is succinct, economical and error-free. Sentences are varied and complex, and diction is expressive and precise.In sum, this essay exemplifies the very top of the "6" range described in the scoring guide. If the writer had been less eloquent