2019考研英語五夜十篇10月3日ipad手寫版三

第?二篇：核電管①Adealisadeal—apparently,whenEntergyis②Thecompany,amajor rinNewEngland,provokedjustifiedoutrageinVermontlastweekwhenit【夢之家考研】免費(fèi)更新ExperienceRealLifePenGesturesonYourScreen| announceditwasrenegingonalongstandingcommitmenttoabidebythestate’sstrictnuclearregulations.26.Thephrase“renegingon”(Line3,Paragraph1)isclosestinmeaningto.【夢之家考研】免費(fèi)更新ExperienceRealLifePenGesturesonYourScreen| ①Instead,companyhasdonepreciselywhatithadlongpromiseditwouldnot:challengethe MADEBYFLXCIL:PDFANNOTATION&STUDY constitutionalityofVermont’srulesinthefederalcourt,aspartofadesperateefforttokeepitsVermontYankeenuclearpowerplantrunning.②It’sastunning hasbeensurfacingsince2002,【夢之家考研】免費(fèi)更新ExperienceRealLifePenGesturesonYourScreen| whenthecorporationboughtVermont’sonlynuclearpowerplant,anagingreactorinVernon.②Asaconditionofreceivingstateapprovalforthesale,the【夢之家考研】免費(fèi)更新ExperienceRealLifePenGesturesonYourScreen| agreedtoseekpermissionfromstateregulatorstooperatepast2012.Byenteringintothe2002agreement,Entergyintendedto.[A]obtainprotectionfromVermont【夢之家考研】免費(fèi)更新ExperienceRealLifePenGesturesonYourScreen| favorfromthefederal anextensionofitsbusinesslicenseD.getpermissiontopurchaseapowerplant③In2006,thestatewentastepfurthe,requiringthatany【夢之家考研】免費(fèi)更新ExperienceRealLifePenGesturesonYourScreen| extensionoftheplant’slicensebesubjecttotheVermontlegislature’s④Then,too,thecompanywentalong.①EitherEntergyneverreallyintendedtoliveby【夢之家考研】免費(fèi)更新ExperienceRealLifePenGesturesonYourScreen| thosecommitments,oritsimplydidn’tforeseewhatwouldhappennext.【夢之家考研】免費(fèi)更新ExperienceRealLifePenGesturesonYourScreen| ②Astringofaccidents,includingthepartialcollapseofacoolingtowerin2007andthediscoveryofanundergroundpipesystemleakage,raisedseriousquestionsaboutbothVermontYankee’ssafetyandEntergy’smanagement—especiallyafterthecompanymade MADE misleadingstatementsaboutthe AccordingtoParagraph4,Entergyseemstohaveproblemswithits managerialtechnical MADE [C]financialgoals[D]businessvision③EnragedbyEntergy’sbehavio,theVermontSenatevoted26to4lastyearagainstallowinganextension. MADE ①Nowthecompanyissuddenlyclaimingthatthe2002agreementisinvalidbecauseofthe2006legislation,andthatonlythe ernmenthas MADE regulatorypowerovernuclear②Thelegalissuesinthecaseareobscure:whereastheSupremeCourthasruledthatstatesdohavesomeregulatoryauthorityovernuclearpower, MADE legalscholarssaythatVermontcasewillofferaprecedentsettingtestofhowfarthosepowersextend.Intheauthor’sview,theVermontcasewilltest [A]Entergy’scapacitytofulfillallitspromises MADE B.thenatureofpatchworkC.thefederalauthorityovernuclearissuesD.thelimitsofstates’powerovernuclearissues MADE ③Certainly,therevalidconcernsaboutthepatchworkregulationsthatcouldresultifeverystatesetsitsownrules.

MADEBYFLEXCIL ④ButhadEntergyitsword,thatdebatewouldbebesidethepoint. ①ThecompanyseemshaveconcludedthatitsreputationinVermontisalreadysodamagedthatithasnotinglefttolosebygoingtowarwiththestate. Itcanbeinferredfromthelastparagraphthat Entergy’sbusiness mightbeaffectedtheauthorityoftheNRCwillbeEntergywillwithdraw Plymouthapplication [D]Vermont’sreputationmightbe②Butthereshouldbe③Permissiontorunanuclearplantisapublic ④Entergyruns11otherreactorsintheUnitedStates,includingPilgrimNuclearstationinPlymouth. 6.⑤PledgingtoPilgrimsafely,thecompanyhasappliedforfederalpermissiontokeepitopenforanother206.⑥Butasthe RegulatoryCommissionreviewsthecompany’sapplication,itshouldkeepitmindwhatpromisesfromEntergyareworth.Thephrase“renegingon”(Line3,Paragraph1) isclosestinmeaning. Byenteringintothe2002agreement,Entergyintendedto.obtainprotectionfromVermont favorfromthefederal anextensionofitsbusinesslicensegetpermissiontopurchaseapowerplant AccordingtoParagraph4,Entergyseemstohaveproblemswithits managerialtechnicalinnovativenessC.financialgoals[D]businessvision Intheauthor’sview,theVermontcasewilltest Entergy’scapacitytofulfillallitspromisesthenatureofpatchworkthefederalauthorityovernuclearissues [D]