高二英語師大選擇性必修二-Unit-6-The-Media課件2_第1頁
高二英語師大選擇性必修二-Unit-6-The-Media課件2_第2頁
高二英語師大選擇性必修二-Unit-6-The-Media課件2_第3頁
高二英語師大選擇性必修二-Unit-6-The-Media課件2_第4頁
高二英語師大選擇性必修二-Unit-6-The-Media課件2_第5頁
已閱讀5頁,還剩27頁未讀 繼續(xù)免費(fèi)閱讀

下載本文檔

版權(quán)說明:本文檔由用戶提供并上傳,收益歸屬內(nèi)容提供方,若內(nèi)容存在侵權(quán),請(qǐng)進(jìn)行舉報(bào)或認(rèn)領(lǐng)

文檔簡(jiǎn)介

選擇性必修二Unit6TheMedia(2)高二年級(jí)英語FromPagetoScreen

Reading(2)

1.Reviewthepreviouslesson.Whatisthewriter’sattitudetowardsthefilmsadaptedfrombooks?Whatarethesourcematerialsforadaptedfilms?Whatarethemainchallengesfacedbyfilmmakers?ActivateandshareArtsjournalistJamesHopehasoftenbeen

aboutafilmofabookheloves.Thesourcematerialforafilmmaybetakenfromclassicnovels,shortstories,comicbooksandstageplays,aswellassuchasbiographiesandautobiographies.Somefilmgetlowerratingsthantheoriginalbooksbecausetheyoftenfailwithbothcinemaaudiencesand.Activateandshare2.Fillinthesummaryofthetext.pessimisticnon-fictionadaptationscriticshavedifficultydecidingwhatisappropriateforthescreenandtakecreativelibertybychangingtheplotandmakingadditions.Thecastmaybetheproblem.Readerscharactersandhavedefiniteideasabouthowtheyshouldlookandsound.CGI(ComputerImage)technologyhasmadeitpossibleforthepreviouslyunfilmabletobecomeareality.Writershavesometimesbeenverywiththefilmversionsoftheirbooks.ActivateandshareScreenwritersvisualiseunsatistiedGeneratedDigdeeperWhydoaudiencesalwayshavethefeelingof“thefilmisnotlikethebook”?Whatfactorsshouldbetakenintoconsiderationwhenadaptingbooksintofilms?Whatistheauthor’sopinionattheendaboutadaptedfilms?Highlighttheevidenceinthearticle.Doyouagreewiththeauthor’spointofview?Whyorwhynot?Whydoaudiencesalwayshavethefeelingof“thefilmisnotlikethebook”?

Atypicalfilmisonlyaroundtwohourslong.Thescreenwritershavetodecidewhatisappropriateforthescreenandwhattoleaveout.DigdeeperWhydoaudiencesalwayshavethefeelingof“thefilmisnotlikethebook”?

Screenwriterstakecreativeliberty.Topleaseproducers,directorsandtestaudiences.Changetheplot.DigdeeperWhydoaudiencesalwayshavethefeelingof“thefilmisnotlikethebook”?

Thescreenwritershavetodecidewhatisappropriateforthescreenandwhattoleaveout.Changetheplot.Thefilmisnotlikethebook.Digdeepertimelimitationtakecreativeliberty.topleasecertainpeopleWhatfactorsshouldbetakenintoconsiderationwhenadaptingbooksintofilms?Findingactorsacceptabletofilmaudiencescanmeanthedifferencebetweensuccessandfailure.Sincebooksarejusttoodifficulttobeadaptedfortechnicalreasons.Digdeepertheselectionofcasts,theuseoftechnologyWhatfactorsshouldbetakenintoconsiderationwhenadaptingbooksintofilms?Ihaveoftenleftthecinemafeeling“thefilmisnotlikethebook”.Thewritersaretooinvolved,whichcanbeadisadvantage.DigdeeperthescreenwritersWhatfactorsshouldbetakenintoconsiderationwhenadaptingbooksintofilms?Theselectionofcasts,theuseoftechnologyandthescreenwritersshouldbeconsideredwhenadaptingbooksintofilms.DigdeeperWhatistheauthor’sopinionattheendaboutadaptedfilms?Highlighttheevidenceinthearticle. Anywayitisalwaysabadideatowatchafilmofabook youlove.Theauthorisnegativeaboutit.DigdeeperDoyouagreewiththeauthor’spointofview?Whyorwhynot?

Idon’tagreewiththeauthor.IhavewatchedtheTVseriesSherlockwhichwasadaptedfromtheoriginalseriesbySirArthurConanDoyle.Theseriesdidchangetheplot.Infact,thescreenwritersmadedramaticchangestothesettingandthestoriesDigdeeper3.Doyouagreewiththeauthor’spointofview?Whyorwhynot?Buttheseriesarestillverypopularandbroadlylikedbecausethesettingandthestoriesfitperfectlywithourmodernlifewithoutdisrespectingtheoriginalbooks.Also,thecastingfitsthecharactersinthebookquitewell,nottomentiontheactors’actingskills.Personally,Ithinkitisjustasgoodasthebooks.DigdeeperDoyouagreewiththeauthor’spointofview?Whyorwhynot?

Frommypointofview,Itotallyagreewiththeauthor.ThereisnodenyingthatDreamoftheRedChamberisoneofthemostfamousChineseclassicnovels.ItsTVseriesversioniswell-knowninChina,becauseitrestorestheoriginalwork.Andit’salsoeasiertogothroughthanthenovel.DigdeeperDoyouagreewiththeauthor’spointofview?Whyorwhynot?

Inmyopinion,theTVseriesversionisindeedagreatworkofart,butit’sstillnotasgoodastheoriginalbook.Becausesomeimportanthintsandmetaphors,aswellassomeinterestingdetailsgivingcluestothestoryline,aremissingonthescreen.SoIdon’tagreewiththeauthor.Digdeeper1.Whatisthegenreofthearticle?Why?Narrative(記敘文)Expositoryessay(說明文)Argumentativeessay(議論文)Readforstructure2.Labeleachparagraphofthepassagewithdifferentheadings.IntroductionBodyConclusionReadforstructurePara.1—Para.2Para.3—Para.6Para.73.Readthepassageagainanddrawamindmaptofigureoutthestructure.Thefollowingquestionsmayhelpyou.Howdidtheauthorintroducetheproblem?Fromwhataspectsdidheanalysetheproblem?Howdidtheauthorconcludehisargument?ReadforstructureReadforstructureSummaryofthestructureReadforwriting1.Task Moreandmoreworkshavebeenadaptedintofilms.Somepeopleenjoywatchingfilmswhileothersenjoyreadingbooks.Whatisyouropinion? Writeapassageabout“Filmorbook,whichdoyouprefer?”ReadforwritingTheadvantagesanddisadvantagesofreadingbooks:interestinghintsandcluesbeautifullanguagetakesalotoftimedifficulttounderstand...

2.Shareideas.

ReadforwritingTheadvantagesanddisadvantagesofwatchingfilms:time-savingseeouridolsplayingourfavoritecharactersmisslotsofhintsormetaphors...2.Shareideas.

ReadforwritingPersonalopinionsExpressyouropinions:IpreferAtoB.Propertransition:Firstly;Secondly;Lastbutnotleast....2.Shareideas.

3.Onepossibleanswer.Filmorbook,whichdoyouprefer?Someofusthinkthatitisbettertoseethefilmthantoreadthebook.Thereasonisthatittakeslesstimetounderstandthewholestory.Besides,thefilmisusuallymoreinteresting,anditiseasiertofollow.Readforwriting

溫馨提示

  • 1. 本站所有資源如無特殊說明,都需要本地電腦安裝OFFICE2007和PDF閱讀器。圖紙軟件為CAD,CAXA,PROE,UG,SolidWorks等.壓縮文件請(qǐng)下載最新的WinRAR軟件解壓。
  • 2. 本站的文檔不包含任何第三方提供的附件圖紙等,如果需要附件,請(qǐng)聯(lián)系上傳者。文件的所有權(quán)益歸上傳用戶所有。
  • 3. 本站RAR壓縮包中若帶圖紙,網(wǎng)頁內(nèi)容里面會(huì)有圖紙預(yù)覽,若沒有圖紙預(yù)覽就沒有圖紙。
  • 4. 未經(jīng)權(quán)益所有人同意不得將文件中的內(nèi)容挪作商業(yè)或盈利用途。
  • 5. 人人文庫網(wǎng)僅提供信息存儲(chǔ)空間,僅對(duì)用戶上傳內(nèi)容的表現(xiàn)方式做保護(hù)處理,對(duì)用戶上傳分享的文檔內(nèi)容本身不做任何修改或編輯,并不能對(duì)任何下載內(nèi)容負(fù)責(zé)。
  • 6. 下載文件中如有侵權(quán)或不適當(dāng)內(nèi)容,請(qǐng)與我們聯(lián)系,我們立即糾正。
  • 7. 本站不保證下載資源的準(zhǔn)確性、安全性和完整性, 同時(shí)也不承擔(dān)用戶因使用這些下載資源對(duì)自己和他人造成任何形式的傷害或損失。

評(píng)論

0/150

提交評(píng)論