2019考研英語凱旋門課堂6月18日講義直播第一次何_第1頁
2019考研英語凱旋門課堂6月18日講義直播第一次何_第2頁
2019考研英語凱旋門課堂6月18日講義直播第一次何_第3頁
2019考研英語凱旋門課堂6月18日講義直播第一次何_第4頁
2019考研英語凱旋門課堂6月18日講義直播第一次何_第5頁
已閱讀5頁,還剩4頁未讀, 繼續(xù)免費(fèi)閱讀

下載本文檔

版權(quán)說明:本文檔由用戶提供并上傳,收益歸屬內(nèi)容提供方,若內(nèi)容存在侵權(quán),請(qǐng)進(jìn)行舉報(bào)或認(rèn)領(lǐng)

文檔簡(jiǎn)介

2019考研英語凱旋門課堂618日講義1.Howthingshavechanged!O2.In1995theUnitedStatescanlookbackonfiveyearsofsolidgrowthwhileJapanhasbeenstruggling.O3.FewAmericansattributethissolelytosuchobviouscausesasadevalueddollarortheturningofthebusinesshaschangeditsstructure,hasgoneonadiet,haslearnttobemorequick-witted,”accordingtoRichardCavanagh,executivedeanofHarvard’sKennedySchoolofernment.6.“ItmakesmeproudtobeanAmericanjusttoseehowourbusinessesareimprovingtheirproductivity,”saysStephenMooreoftheCatoInstitute,athink-inWashington,DC.7.AndWilliamSahlmanoftheHarvardBusinessSchoolbelievesthatpeoplewilllookbackonthisperiodas“agoldenageofbusinessmanagementintheUnitedStates.”(567的觀點(diǎn)?。㏕heauthorseemstobelievetherevivaloftheU.S.economyinthe1990scanbeattributedtothe turningofthebusinessrestructuringofimprovedbusiness 觀點(diǎn)詞:believe,argue,contend,moan,comin,assert,hold,think,maintain,insist,words(虛擬語氣:ItishightimethatwetookeffectiveinitiativetoputthissituationonYoushouldnothavesaidthat.情態(tài)動(dòng)詞:may,might,could,can,must,need,would,will,should祈使句:Comehere!Doitforthenation!強(qiáng)調(diào)句(感嘆句!疑問句):Itis(was)…that(who)… “TheancientHawaiianswereastronomers,”wroteQueenLiliuokalani,Hawaii’slastreigningmonarch,in1897.OStarwatcherswereamongthemostesteemedmembersofHawaiiansociety.FSadly,allisnotwellwithastronomyinHawaiitoday.OshaveeruptedoverconstructionoftheThirtyMeterescope(TMT),agiantobservatorythatpromisestorevolutionizehumanity’sviewofthecosmos.FAtissueistheTMT’snnedlocationonMaunaKea,adormantvolcanoworshipedbysomeHawaiiansasthepikothatconnectstheHawaiianIslandstotheheavens.FButMaunaKeaisalsohometosomeoftheworld’smostpowerfulescopes.RestedinthePacificOcean,MaunaKea’speakrisesabovethebulkofournet’sdenseatmosphere,whereconditionsallowescopestoobtainimagesofunsurpassedclarity.FOppositiontoescopesonMaunaKeaisnothingnew.AsmallbutvocalgroupofHawaiiansandenvironmentalistshavelongviewedtheirpresenceasdisrespectforsacredlandandapainfulreminderoftheoccupationofwhatwasonceasovereignnation.OSomeblameforthecurrentcontroversybelongstoIntheireagernesstobuildbiggerescopes,theyforgotthatscienceisnottheonlywayofunderstandingtheworld.OTheydidnotalwaysprioritizetheprotectionofMaunaKea’sfragileecosystemsoritsholinesstotheislands’inhabitants.FHawaiiancultureisnotarelicofthepast;itisalivingcultureundergoingarenaissancetoday.FYetsciencehasaculturalhistory,too,withrootsgoingbacktothedawnofcivilization.F(結(jié)論)ThesamecuriositytofindwhatliesbeyondthehorizonthatfirstbroughtearlyPolynesianstoHawaii’sshoresinspiresastronomerstodaytoexploretheheavens.FCallstodisassembleallescopesonMaunaKeaortobanfuturedevelopmentthereignoretherealitythatastronomyandHawaiianculturebothseektoanswerbigquestionsaboutwhoweare,wherewecomefromandwherewearegoing.OPerhapsthatiswhyweexplorethestarryskies,asifansweringaprimalcallingtoknowourselvesandourtrueancestralhomes.OTheastronomycommunityismakingcompromisestochangeitsuseofMaunaKea.FTheTMTsitewaschosentominimizethe escope’svisibilityaroundtheislandandtoavoidarchaeologicalandenvironmentalimpact.FTolimitthenumberof escopesonMaunaKea,oldoneswillberemovedattheendoftheirlifetimesandtheirsitesreturnedtoanaturalstate.FThereisnoreasonwhyeveryonecannotbe edonMaunaKeatoembracetheirculturalheritageandtostudythestars.O RobertF.Kennedyoncesaidthatacountry’sGDPmeasures“everythingexceptthatwhichmakeslifeworthwhile.”O(jiān)WithBritainvotingtoleavetheEuropeanUnion,andGDPalreadypredictedtoslowasaresult,itisnowatimelymomenttoassesswhathewasreferringto.OThequestionofGDPanditsusefulnesshasannoyedmakersforoverhalfacentury.FManyarguethatitisaflawedconcept.Itmeasuresthingsthatdonotmatterandmissesthingsthatdo.Bymostrecentmeasures,theUK’sGDPhasbeentheenvyoftheWesternworld,withrecordlowunemploymentandhighgrowthfigures.FIfeverythingwasgoingsowell,thenwhydidover17millionpeoplevoteforBrexit,despitethewarningsaboutwhatitcoulddototheircountry’seconomicprospects?OArecentannualstudyofcountriesandtheirabilitytoconvertgrowthintowellbeingshedssomelightonthatquestion.FAcrossthe163countriesmeasured,theUKisoneofthepoorestperformersinensuringthateconomicgrowthistranslatedintomeaningfulimprovementsforitscitizens.FRatherthanjustfocusingonGDP,over40differentsetsofcriteriafromhealth,educationandcivilsocietyengagementhavebeenmeasuredtogetamoreroundedassessmentofhowcountriesareperforming.FWhileallofthesecountriesfacetheirownchallenges,thereareanumberofconsistentthemes.FYes,therehasbeenabuddingeconomicrecoverysincethe2008globalcrash,butinkeyindicatorsinareassuchashealthandeducation,majoreconomieshavetodecline.FYetthisisn’tthecasewithallSomerelativelypoorEuropeancountrieshaveseenhugeimprovementsacrossmeasuresincludingcivilsociety, eequalityandenvironment.FThisisalessonthatrichcountriescanlearn:WhenGDPisnolongerregardedasthesolemeasureofacountry’ssuccess,theworldlooksverydifferent.OSowhatKennedywasreferringtowasthatwhileGDPhasbeenthemostcommonmethodformeasuringtheeconomicactivityofnations,asameasure,itisnolongerenough.OItdoesnotincludeimportantfactorssuchasenvironmentalqualityoreducationes—allthingsthatcontributetoa ’ssenseofwell-being.FThesharphittogrowthpredictedaroundtheworldandintheUKcouldleadtoadeclineintheeverydayserviceswedependonforourwell-beingandforgrowth.Butmakerswhorefocuseffortsonimprovingwell-beingratherthansimplyworryingaboutGDPfigurescouldavoidtheforecasteddoomandmayevenseeprogress.OI,few觀點(diǎn)詞+觀點(diǎn)=作者明確≠作者觀(1)作者不表態(tài)(作者沒有觀點(diǎn)Step1:定位(Locating)(讀完相應(yīng)的段落就解題1.Forthefirsttimeinhistorymorepeopleliveintownsthaninthecountry.2.InBritainthishashadacuriousresult.3.WhilepollsshowBritonsrate“thecountryside”alongsidetheroyalfamily,ShakespeareandtheNationalHealthService(NHS)aswhatmakesthemproudestoftheircountry,thishaslimitedpoliticalsupport.Britain’spublicsentimentaboutthe didn’tstarttilltheShakespeareanhasbroughtmuchbenefittotheisfullybackedbytheroyalisnotwellreflectedin1.AcenturyagoOctaviaHilllaunchedtheNationalTrustnottorescuestylishhousesbuttosave“thebeautyofnaturalcesforeveryoneforever.”2.Itwasspecificallytoprovidecitydwellerswithspacesforleisurewheretheycouldexperience“arefreshingair.”3.Hill’spressurelaterledtothecreationofnationalparksandgreenbelts.4.Theydon’tmakecountrysideanymore,andeveryyearconcreteconsumesmoreofit.5.Itneedsconstantguardianship.5AccordingtoParagraph2,theachievementsoftheNationalTrustarenow.graduallylargelyproperly1.Atthenextelectionnoneofthebigpartiesseemlikelytoendorsethissentiment.2.TheConservatives’nningreformexplicitlygivesruraldevelopmentpriorityoverconservation,evenauthorising“off-n”buildingwherelocalpeoplemightobject.3.Theconceptofsustainabledevelopmenthasbeendefinedasprofitable.4.Labourlikewisewantstodiscontinuelocalnningwherecouncilsopposedevelopment.5.TheLiberalDemocratsaresilent.6.OnlyUkip,sensingitschance,hassidedwiththosepleadingforamoreconsideredapproachtousinggreenland.7.ItsntoProtectRuralEnglandstruckterrorintomanylocalConsecutiveWhichofthefollowingcanbeinferredfromParagraphLabourisunderattackforopposingTheConservativesmayabandon“off-n”TheLiberalDemocratsarelosingpoliticalUkipmaygainfromitssupportforrural1.Thesensiblecetobuildnewhouses,factoriesandofficesiswherepeopleare,incitiesandtownswhereinfrastructureisince.2.TheLondonagentsStirlingAckroydrecentlyidentifiedenoughsitesforhalfamillionhousesintheLondonarealone,withnointrusionongreenbelt.3.WhatistrueofLondoniseventruerofthe1.Theideathat“housingcrisis”equals“concretedmeadows”ispurelobbyTheissueisnottheneedformorehousesbut,asalways,wheretoputUnderlobbypressure,GeorgeOsbornefavoursruralnew-buildagainsturbanrenovationandrenewal.3.Hefavoursout-of-townshopsitesagainsthighstreets.Thisisnotamarketbutabiasedone.5.Ruraltownsandvillageshavegrownandwillalwaysgrow.5.Theydosobestwherebuildingstickstotheiredgesandrespectstheircharacter.6.Wedonotruinurbanconservationareas.7.WhyruinruralTheauthorholdsthatGeorgeOsborne’s highlightshisfirmstandagainstlobbyshowshisdisregardforthecharacterofruralstressesthenecessityofeasingthehousingrevealsastrongprejudiceagainsturban61.Developmentshouldbenned,notletrip.2.AftertheNetherlands,BritainisEurope’smostcrowdedcountry.3.Halfacenturyoftownandcountrynninghasenabledittoretainanenviableruralcoherence,whilestillpermittinglow-densityurbanliving.4.Thereisnodoubtofthealternative—thecorruptedlandscapesofsouthernPortugal,SpainorIreland.5.Avoidingthisratherthanpromotingitshouldunitetheleftandrightofthepoliticalspectrum.5Inthelastparagraph,theauthorshowshisappreciation thesizeofpopulationinthepoliticallifeintoday’stheenviableurbanlifestyleinthetown-and-countrynningin二.態(tài)度 4.例證 Comeon—Everybody’sngit.Thatwhisperedmessage,halfinvitationandhalfforcing,iswhatmostofusthinkofwhenwehearthewordspeerpressure.Itusuallyleadstonogood—drinking,drugsandcasual .ButinhernewbookJointheClub,TinaRosenbergcontendsthatpeerpressurecanalsobeapositivethroughwhatshecallsthesocialcure,inwhichorganizationsandofficialsusethepowerofgroupdynamicstohelpindividualsimprovetheirlivesandpossiblytheRosenberg,therecipientofaPulitzerPrize,offersahostofexamplesofthesocialcureinaction:InSouthCarolina,astate-sponsoredantismokingprogramcalledRageAgainsttheHazesetsouttomakecigarettesuncool.InSouthAfrica,anHIV-preventioninitiativeknownasloveLiferecruitsyoungpeopletopromoteamongtheirTheideaseemspromising,andRosenbergisaperceptiveobserver.Hercritiqueofthelamenessofmanypubic-healthnsisspot-on:theyfailtomobilizepeerpressureforhealthyhabits,andtheydemonstrateaseriouslyflawedunderstandingofpsychology.“Daretobedifferent,pleasedon’tsmoke!”pleadsonebillboardnaimedatreducingsmokingamongteenagers—teenagers,whodesirenothingmorethanfittingin.Rosenbergarguesconvincinglythatpublic-healthadvocatesoughttotakeapagefromadvertisers,soskilledatapplyingpeerpressure.Butonthegeneraleffectivenessofthesocialcure,Rosenbergislesspersuasive.JointheClubisfilledwithtoomuchirrelevantdetailandnotenoughexplorationofthesocialandbiologicalfactorsthatmakepeerpressuresopowerful.Themostglaringflawofthesocialcureasit’spresentedhereisthatitdoesn’tworkverywellforverylong.RageAgainsttheHazefailedoncestatefundingwascut.EvidencethattheloveLifeprogramproduceslastingchangesislimitedandmixed.There’snodoubtthatourpeergroupsexertenormousinfluenceonourbehavior.Anemergingbodyofresearchshowsthatpositivehealthhabits—aswellasnegativeones—spreadthroughnetworksoffriendsviasocialcommunication.Thisisasubtleformofpeerpressure:weunconsciouslyimitatethebehaviorweseeeveryday.Farlesscertain,however,ishowsuccessfullyexpertsandbureaucratscanselectourpeergroupsandsteertheiractivitiesinvirtuousdirections.It’sliketheteacherwhobreaksupthetroublemakersinthebackrowbypairingthemwithbetter-behavedclassmates.Thetacticneverreallyworks.Andthat’stheproblemwithasocialcureengineeredfromtheoutside:intherealworld,asinschool,weinsistonchoosingourownfriends.It

溫馨提示

  • 1. 本站所有資源如無特殊說明,都需要本地電腦安裝OFFICE2007和PDF閱讀器。圖紙軟件為CAD,CAXA,PROE,UG,SolidWorks等.壓縮文件請(qǐng)下載最新的WinRAR軟件解壓。
  • 2. 本站的文檔不包含任何第三方提供的附件圖紙等,如果需要附件,請(qǐng)聯(lián)系上傳者。文件的所有權(quán)益歸上傳用戶所有。
  • 3. 本站RAR壓縮包中若帶圖紙,網(wǎng)頁內(nèi)容里面會(huì)有圖紙預(yù)覽,若沒有圖紙預(yù)覽就沒有圖紙。
  • 4. 未經(jīng)權(quán)益所有人同意不得將文件中的內(nèi)容挪作商業(yè)或盈利用途。
  • 5. 人人文庫網(wǎng)僅提供信息存儲(chǔ)空間,僅對(duì)用戶上傳內(nèi)容的表現(xiàn)方式做保護(hù)處理,對(duì)用戶上傳分享的文檔內(nèi)容本身不做任何修改或編輯,并不能對(duì)任何下載內(nèi)容負(fù)責(zé)。
  • 6. 下載文件中如有侵權(quán)或不適當(dāng)內(nèi)容,請(qǐng)與我們聯(lián)系,我們立即糾正。
  • 7. 本站不保證下載資源的準(zhǔn)確性、安全性和完整性, 同時(shí)也不承擔(dān)用戶因使用這些下載資源對(duì)自己和他人造成任何形式的傷害或損失。

評(píng)論

0/150

提交評(píng)論