版權(quán)說(shuō)明:本文檔由用戶提供并上傳,收益歸屬內(nèi)容提供方,若內(nèi)容存在侵權(quán),請(qǐng)進(jìn)行舉報(bào)或認(rèn)領(lǐng)
文檔簡(jiǎn)介
Synthesisreport
lmpactoftheRussia-UkrainewaronAfrica
Policyimplicationsfornavigatingshocks
andbuildingresilience
SherillynRaga,HeinrichBohlmann,AlbertoLemma,
DianahNgui,PhyllisPapadavid,DirkWillemteVelde
andChahirZaki
January2024
ECONOMICRESEARCHFORUM
(SS工
1g
uSLaig
pep
iipfor
DOlicy
ODISynthesisreport
2
IDRC·CRDI
InternationalDevelopmentResearchCentre
Centrederecherchespourledéveloppementinternational
Canada
Readersareencouragedtoreproducematerialfortheirown
publications,aslongastheyarenotbeingsoldcommercially.ODI
requestsdueacknowledgementandacopyofthepublication.
Foronlineuse,weaskreaderstolinktotheoriginalresourceonthe
ODIwebsite.Theviewspresentedinthispaperarethoseofthe
author(s)anddonotnecessarilyrepresenttheviewsofODlorour
partners.
ThisworkislicensedunderCCBY-NC-ND4.0.
Howtocite:Raga,S.,Bohlmann,H.,Lemma,A.,Ngui,D.,
Papadavid,P.,teVelde,D.W.andZaki,C.(2024)'Impactofthe
Russia-UkrainewaronAfrica:policyimplicationsfornavigating
shocksandbuildingresilience'ODISynthesisReport.London:ODI
(
/en/publications/impact-of-the-russia-ukraine-war-on
-
africa-policy-implications-for-navigating-shocks-and-building-
resilience)
ODISynthesisreport
3
Acknowledgements
Aboutthispublication
ThissynthesispaperdrawsonthefollowingsixstudiesfromaprojectledbytheAfricanEconomicResearchConsortium(AERC),the
EconomicResearchForum(ERF)andthePartnershipforEconomic
Policy(PEP)andsupportedbyCanada’sInternationalDevelopment
ResearchCentre(IDRC):
1Benayad,M.(2023)‘Casdudéveloppementdeséchanges
agricolesentreleMarocetleSénégal’.Unpublisheddraftpaper
asofJune2023.
2Cororaton,C.(2023)‘TheimpactofthewarinUkraine:estimatingtheeconomicandwelfarelossesinAfricausingaglobalCGE
model’UnpublisheddraftpaperasofJune2023
Cororaton,C.,Bohlmann,H.,Bohlmann,J.andHenseler,M.
(2023)‘TheimpactoftheRussia-Ukrainewar:estimatingthe
economicandwelfarelossesinAfricausingaglobalCGEmodel’.
PolicyBrief267.PartnershipforEconomicPolicy
(
/public/project/20692
).
3Geda,A.andMusyoka,M.P.(2023)‘ImpactsoftheUkraine
crisesonfoodsecurityinKenyaandEthiopia:optionsforregionalTradecollaboration’.WorkingPaperIWU-CC-002.Nairobi:AERC.
4M’boukeS.,Gurara,D.,Ngui,D.andShimeles,A.(2023)‘The
echoesofconflict:analyzingthepotentialimpactsoftheRussia-
UkrainewaronAfrica’UnpublisheddraftpaperasofJune2023.
M’boukeS.,Gurara,D.,Ngui,D.andShimeles,A.(2023)‘The
echoesofconflict:analyzingthepotentialimpactsoftheRussia-
UkrainewaronAfrica’.PolicyBriefIWU-PB-001.Nairobi:AERC.
5Ngepah,N.(2023)‘Foodsecurityeffectsoffoodandagricultural
inputstradeshocksfromtheRussia-UkraineregioninSouth
AfricaandMozambique:exploringtherolesoftheMaputo
corridor,SADC,andcontinentalsources’.WorkingPaperIWU-
CC-003.Nairobi:AERC.
6Zaki,C.,Alhelo,A.andSuliman,K.(2023)‘Trade,foodsecurity,
andthewarinUkraine:ThecasesofEgyptandSudan’.Working
Paper1659.Giza:ERF.
TheauthorsaregratefultoSheilaPageforpeerreviewandtoArjan
deHaanandIDRCcolleaguesforvaluablecommentsandinsights
throughouttheproject.Wealsothankparticipantsatworkshopsin
MarrakechheldinOctober2023aroundtheIMF/WorldBankAnnual
Meetingsforcomments.
4
Abouttheauthors
SherillynRagaisaResearchFellowatODI.
HeinrichBohlmannisaResearchDirectoratPEPandanAssociate
ProfessorattheUniversityofPretoria.
AlbertoLemmaisaResearchFellowatODI.
DianahNguiisaResearchManageratAERC.
PhyllisPapadavidisaSeniorResearchAssociateatODI,current
DirectorofResearchatAthenaMacroeconomicsandanAssociate
FacultyMemberatColumbiaUniversity.
DirkWillemteVeldeisaDirectorofProgrammesatODIand
ProfessorofPracticeatSOASUniversityofLondon.
ChahirZakiisaChairedProfessorattheUniversityofOrléans,a
ProfessoratCairoUniversityandaLeadEconomistatERF.
5
Contents
Acknowledgements 3
Acronyms 6
Executivesummary 7
1Introduction 14
2Analyticalframework 16
Economicexposure 17
Resilience 18
Country-levelimpact 19
3SizeoftheRussia–Ukraineshock 20
4ExposuretotheRussia–Ukrainewarshock 22
DirectbilateralexposuretoRussiaandUkraine 22
Indirectexposuretoglobaleffects 28
5Resiliencetotheshock 33
Economicpolicyspace 33
Policyresponses 35
6ImpactoftheRussia–Ukraineshock 38
7Policyimplications 44
8Conclusions 47
References 48
6
Acronyms
ADB
AsianDevelopmentBank
AERC
AfricanEconomicResearchConsortium
AfCFTA
AfricanContinentalFreeTradeArea
BCEAO
CentralBankofWestAfricanStates
CGE
computablegeneralequilibrium
CDIS
CoordinatedDirectInvestmentSurvey
CPIS
CoordinatedPortfolioInvestmentSurvey
DRMK
DisasterRiskManagementKnowledgeCentre
EMBIG
EmergingMarketBondIndexGlobal
ERF
EconomicResearchForum
ESCAP
UnitedNationsEconomicandSocialCommissionforAsiaandthePacific
EU
EuropeanUnion
FAO
FoodandAgricultureOrganizationoftheUnitedNations
FDI
foreigndirectinvestment
FSIN
FoodSecurityInformationNetwork
GDP
grossdomesticproduct
GNAFC
GlobalNetworkAgainstFoodCrises
GVAR
globalvectorautoregressive
HIC
high-incomecountry
IDRC
InternationalDevelopmentResearchCentre
IDS
InternationalDebtStatistics
IFS
InternationalFinancialStatistics
ILO
InternationalLabourOrganization
IMF
InternationalMonetaryFund
LIC
low-incomecountry
L&MICs
low-andmiddle-incomecountries
OECD
OrganisationforEconomicCooperationandDevelopment
PEP
PartnershipforEconomicPolicy
pp
percentagepoints
SVB
SiliconValleyBank
UK
UnitedKingdom
UN
UnitedNations
UNCTAD
UnitedNationsConferenceonTradeandDevelopment
UNDP
UnitedNationsDevelopmentProgramme
UNECA
UnitedNationsEconomicCommissionforAfrica
US
UnitedStates
WDI
WorldDevelopmentIndicators
WITS
WorldIntegratedTradeSolutions
WTO
WorldTradeOrganization
7
Executivesummary
TheglobalimpactoftheRussia–Ukrainewar,whichstartedin
February2022,hasbeenmediatedthroughtrade,commodityprices
andfinancialconditions.RussiaandUkrainearemajorglobal
suppliersofoil,wheatandfertilisers.Thewarhasdisruptedexportsfromthetwocountries,induceduncertaintiesinglobalsupplychainsandbeenusedtojustifyexportfoodbansinsomecountries.Theseconditionshavecontributedtoaspikeinglobalpricesofoil,foodandfertilisers,puttingupwardpressuresondomesticprices.Tostopthepriceshockfromtransformingintoinflation,high-incomecountries
(HICs)haveincreasedtheirinterestrates;this,inturn,hastriggeredcapitaloutflows,currencydepreciationandhigherborrowingcostsformanylow-andmiddle-incomecountries(L&MICs).
ItisnotstraightforwardtoisolatetheimpactoftheRussia–
Ukrainewarfromthoseofotherglobalshocks(e.g.COVID-19)
anddomesticdevelopments,butsomestudiesattempttodo
thisbyconstructingcounterfactualsorin-depthcasestudies.
Thispaperutilisesananalyticalframeworktounderstandthe
transmissionchanneloftheimpactoftheRussia–UkrainewaratthecountrylevelinAfrica,particularlytracingtheeconomicexposureandresilienceofAfricancountriestotheimpactofthewar(FigureES1).ThepaperthensynthesisesevidencefromeightAfricancountries
andAfricaasawholebasedonsixstudiesassessingtheimpactof
thewaranditsimplicationsforfoodsecurityinAfrica.
ThesixstudiesincludefourcasestudiescoveringEgypt,Ethiopia,
Kenya,Morocco,Mozambique,Senegal,SouthAfricaandSudan.
Mostofthecasestudieshighlightthelevelofexposureofthese
countriesthroughtradechannels,theeffectsonexchangeratesand
prices,andtheimplicationsforfoodconsumption.Theothertwo
studiesutiliseeconometricmodellingtechniques(i.e.globalvector
autoregressive–GVAR,computablegeneralequilibrium–CGE)to
simulatetheimpactofthewaronkeymacroeconomicvariables(e.g.growth,income)acrossAfricancountries.Asthestudiesused
differentmethodologicaltechniquesandhaddifferentdatacoverage,oursynthesisoftheevidencefromthesestudiesiscomplementedbysecondarydataandinsightsfromthewiderliterature.
Thestudiesareresearchoutputsfromanongoingcollaborative
projectledbytheAfricanEconomicResearchConsortium(AERC),
theEconomicResearchForum(ERF)andthePartnershipfor
EconomicPolicy(PEP)underaprojectsupportedbyCanada’s
InternationalDevelopmentResearchCentre(IDRC).
ODISynthesisreport
8
FigureES1Vulnerabilitytotheeconomicandsocialimpactsof
theRussia-Ukrainewar
Vulnerabillity=exposurelessresilence
GlobalshockExposureResilienceCountry-evelimpact
Directbilateral
exposuretoRussia
andUkraine
·Exports/imports
·Foreigndirect
investment
·Financialflows
·Migration
·Economicspace
Indirectexposureto
globaleffectsofwar
·Tradeopenness
(e.g.,globaltrade)
·Financialopenness
(e.g.,capitaland
exchangerateregimes)
·Financialconditions
(e-g.,interestrates,
capitalflows)
GDPgrowth,prices,
costsofborrowing)·Social(e.g.,food
insecurity,jobs,
poverty,gender)
Long-term
·Humancapital
·Productivity
Russia-Ukrainewarimpact
·Tradedisruptions·Commodityprice
hikes
(e.g.,fiscaldeficit,publicdebt,foreignreserves)
·Institutionalquality·Socialcohesion
·SluggishfinancialandinvestmentfowS
·Globalfinancialtightening
Policycontext
·Economic(e.g.
Short-term
Source:Authors
Economicexposure
AfricancountrieshavelowdirectexposuretotheRussia-
Ukrainewarthroughoveralltrade,financialflowsandmigration
butaremoreexposedinspecificways,forexamplethrough
foodandfertiliserimportsfromRussiaandUkraine.InKenya,
importsfromRussiaandUkraineaccountforonly2.1%and5.1%,
respectively,ofimportsbutwheatmadeup85%oftheseimportsin
2018-2021.InEgypt,20%offoodimports(and67%ofwheat
imports)in2021werefromRussiaandUkraine.Meanwhile,between11%and41%offertiliserimportsinEgypt,Ethiopia,Morocco,
SenegalandSouthAfricaweresourcedfromRussiaandUkrainein
thedecadeupto2021.
Beyonddirectexposure,AfricancountrieshavebeenindirectlyexposedtotheglobaleffectsoftheRussia-Ukrainewarthroughdemandforexportsandinvestmentdecisions.Between2010and2019,amedianAfricancountry'sexportgoodscomprised28%of
grossdomesticproduct(GDP).Duringthesameperiod,foreigndirectinvestmentstockonthecontinentwasequivalentto35%ofGDP.
ThetighteningofmonetarypolicyinHICshasputpressureon
exchangeratesandacceleratedinflationinAfrica.Sinceearly
2022,theUS,theEUandtheUKhaveincreasedinterestratesto
arrestinflation.Thishasledtopronounceddollarstrengtheningand
hasinturninducedcapitaloutflows,currencydepreciationand
ODISynthesisreport
9
wideningsovereignspreadsinAfricancountries.Forexample,the
KenyanshillingandtheSouthAfricanranddepreciatedagainsttheUSdollarby25%and21%,respectively,betweenJanuary2022andAugust2023.Exchangeratedepreciationhaspass-througheffectsoninflationandpushesupthedebtburdenonforeign-denominateddebt.
Resilience
MostAfricancountrieswerestillrecoveringfromCovid-19
limitingtheireconomicpolicyspacewhentheRussia–Ukraine
warhitinearly2022.Sub-SaharanAfrica’sfiscaldeficitwidened
from3.9%ofGDPin2019to6.4%ofGDPin2020,whilepublicdebtincreasedbynearly10percentagepoints(pp)to57%ofGDPduringthesameperiod.Whilesub-SaharanAfrica’sfiscaldeficitandpublicdebtreducedin2021–2022theyremainedworsethanpre-pandemiclevelsin2019.
ForeignreservesdeclinedinfouroutoffiveselectedAfrican
countriesin2022.Intheyearbeforethewar(2021),fiveAfrican
countries(Egypt,Kenya,Morocco,MozambiqueandSouthAfrica)
hadforeignreservesworthfivetosevenmonthsofimports.On
average,sub-SaharanAfricahadforeignreservesworthfivemonthsofimportsin2021.Thisfelltofourmonthsin2022.Atthecountry
level,foreignreservesfellinfouroutoffivecasestudiesin2022,withthehighestdeclinesinEgyptandMozambique,toanequivalentof
threemonthsfromfivemonthsofimportsin2021.Toincrease
resources,Africancountrieshavesoughtaccesstomultilateral
financing.Afewcountries(Chad,Ethiopia,GhanaandZambia)haveappliedfordebttreatmentundertheG20CommonFramework.
AfricancountrieshaverespondedtotheRussia–Ukrainewarshock
invariousways.Oneoftheinitialresponsestothewarincluded
exportbansonfood,fertiliserandoilproducts.Algeria,Burkina
Faso,Cameroon,Egypt,GhanaandTunisiaimposedexportbansonselectedfoodproductsandoilswhereasMoroccoimplemented
exportlicensingfortomatoes.Mostoftheserestrictionshadbeen
liftedbytheendof2022.Ashigherpricesofimportedcommodities
putpressureondomesticprices,tradepoliciesintheformof
subsidiesandsuspendedimportdutiesonselectedstapleitems
(wheat,cattle,crudeoil)werealsoactivatedinMorocco.
Withincreasedinflationandexchangeratepressures,centralbanksinAfricatightenedpolicyinterestrates.PersistentexchangeratepressuresledtheCentralBankofEgypttoimplementdevaluationsandtocommittoashifttoaflexibleexchangerateregimeaspartofthe$3billionInternationalMonetaryFund(IMF)financingsecuredinDecember2022.Othercentralbanks(Egypt,Ethiopia,Ghana,andNigeria)imposedforeignexchangecontrolsandmeasuresto
manageforeigncurrencyflows.
10
Withfiscalspacesqueezed,fiscalpolicyhasbeenlargely
limitedtoafewsocialprotectioninterventionstohelpthosemost
vulnerabletofoodinsecurityrisks.EgyptandSudanhave
implementedconditionalcashtransferprogrammeswhereas
MozambiqueandSouthAfricahavemaintainedsocialsafetynets
andschoolfeedingprogrammesinitiatedduringthepandemic.In
Senegal,thegovernmenthelpedlocalproducerscopewith
increasingfertiliserpricesbycontinuingits50%fertilisersubsidy.
TheRussia–Ukrainewarhasactivatedpolicyinitiativesto
improvelonger-termagriculturalproductionandtradein
commoditiesaffectedbythewar.Suchinitiativesincludeeffortsby
theEthiopiangovernmenttoimprovelocalwheatproduction,
Senegal’splantodevelopitsricevaluechainstostrengthenlocal
production,processingandmarketingofrice,andMorocco’s
agriculturalstrategytodoubletheareasundercultivationfor
rapeseedandsunflowerby2030.
Country-levelimpact
Twostudies(Cororaton,2023;M’boukeetal.,2023)haveattemptedtoisolatetheimpactoftheRussia–Ukrainewarbyconstructing
counterfactualsandestimatingalikelyimpact.Simulationssuggest
thata10%shockinoil,foodandfertiliserpriceslastingonequarter
willleadtodeclinesinAfrica’sGDPby0.1%,0.1%and0.04%,
respectively.ThecombinedannualimpactinAfricathrough
thesepriceshockstranslatestoroughly$7billion.Actual
impactsarelikelytobehighersinceoil,foodandfertiliserprices
increasedbylargershares,at40%,18%and55%,respectively,in
2022,andotherpricesincreasedaswell.Thismeanstheoverall
amountisprobablyanunderestimate.
Thereissignificantvariationintheimpactofthewaracross
Africancountries,dependingontheireconomicstructuresanddomesticvulnerabilities.SimulationssuggestthewarmayresultinfallsinfoodconsumptionofbetweenzeroinsomeSouthernandEastAfricancountriesand6%insomeNorthAfricancountries.Price
shocksfromspecificcommoditieshavedifferenteffectsoncountries’termsoftrade:anoilpriceshockinitiallybenefitsnetoilexporters
withopposingeffectsonnetoilimporters;foodpriceshocks
negativelyaffectthetermsoftradeof22Africancountries;and
fertiliserpriceshockshaveaninsignificanteffectonthetermsof
tradeofmostAfricancountries.Whentheimpactofwarcoincides
withdroughts,countriesintheHornofAfricaexperiencethehighestdeclinesinoutput(ofmorethan3%)thantherestofAfrica(of0.2%).Economicrecoveryisalsoexpectedtobefasteramongnon-resourcecountriesthanresource-intensiveonesbecausetheformerare
supportedbytheirmorediversifiedeconomies.
Similarly,whileitisdifficulttodisentangletheimpactofthewarfrom
multiplefactorsthatdrivegrowth,employment,foodinsecurityand
poverty,thewarmayhaveexacerbatedtheimpactofthe
11
pandemiconthedeteriorationofAfrica’smacroeconomicand
socialperformance.Between2020and2023,thecontinentlost4.2ppofGDPgrowthcomparedwiththepre-Covidforecast.Beyond
output,thenumberofunemployedAfricanswas1.8millionhigherin
2022thaninpre-Covidforecasts,partlydrivenbythelackof
productiveemploymentopportunitiesandbyemploymentnot
growingasfastaspopulationgrowth.Ahigherdebtservicelowers
resourcesfordevelopmentfinancinginAfrica,withinterestrate
paymentoutpacingeducation,healthandinvestmentspending.
Theoverlappingshockshaveslowedprogressintermsof
achievingAfrica’sdevelopmentgoals.In2022,around22%of
Africanswerefacinghighlevelsoffoodinsecurity,withincidence
between50%and75%ofthepopulationinEthiopia,Kenya,
MozambiqueandSudan.Povertyhasalsoincreased,suggestingthat18millionnewpoorpeoplewereaddedin2022tohalfoftheAfricanpopulation(546millionpeople)alreadylivinginpovertyin2021.
Theimpactsofthewarhavedisproportionateeffectsonwomen.
InKenya,forinstance,women-headedhouseholdsinbothruralandurbanareaswerefoundtobemoreaffectedthanhouseholdsheadedbymenbychangesinwheatflourpricesbetweenFebruary2022andMay2023.Priceshocksmayalsohaveaffectedwomenmorethan
menaswomenspendalargerproportionoftheirincomeonfood.
Increasedpricesmayalsohavereversedprogressonwomen’s
accesstomodernenergyandcausedareturntounhealthybiomass
forfuelforcookingandheating.
TheeconomicandsocialimpactsofCOVID-19andtheRussia–
Ukrainewarmayresultinpersistentoutputlossesor‘scarring’
effects.Simulationsofthelong-termeffectsofCOVID-19inAfrica
suggestthatGDPreductionsrelativetoano-COVID-19scenariowillstillbefeltacrosscountriesby2030and2050,aseconomiclosseswillerodegainsinhumandevelopmentinthepastdecades.The
effectsoftheRussia–UkrainewararelikelytocompoundthescarringfromCovid-19inAfrica.
Policyimplications
Thesixstudiesunderlyingthissynthesis,aswellasroundtableand
publicdiscussionsofthestudies’keyfindings,1highlightgeneral
observationsandarangeofcountry-specificpolicysuggestionsfor
governments.
1Tailoredpolicyapproachestoshocks,giventhe
heterogeneousnatureoftheeffectsofthewaronAfrican
countries.Boththesizeandthenatureoftheeffectsvary.
Evidenceshowsthatimpactsgofromzeroto6%ofthetotalvalueoffoodconsumption.Whileseveralresource-intensivecountries
1ThefindingsofthesixstudieswerediscussedduringanODI–IMFcloseddoorroundtableon12May2023,AERC–ERF–PEPmeetingsheldon27Juneand19September2023andanODIeventatthesidelinesoftheIMF–WorldBankAnnualMeetingson11October2023.
12
havebenefitedfromglobalcommoditypriceshocksintheshort
runtheywillbeaffectednegativelyinthelongrun,whilenon-
resource-intensivecountriesareexpectedtogrowfasterinthe
mediumterm.Inaddition,countrieswithhighergovernment
capacitymayexhibitstrongerrecovery.Deeperandmore
persistentoutputcontractionsareexpectedinAfricancountries
withpre-existingvulnerabilities,suchassusceptibilitytoclimate
changeeffectsandpoliticalinstability.Suchheterogeneitymeanssomecountries(e.g.importers)needmoreactionsthanothers,
andthatapproacheswillneedtobetailoredtoenableshort-term
macroeconomicstabilisationbutalsolong-termresilience-
building.Forinstance,resource-intensiveeconomiesmayneedtosupporttransformativesectorswithlarge-scaleemployment(e.g.manufacturing,services)andinvestinupskillingofhumancapitalandclimate-resilientinfrastructure.
2Safeguardingoftargetedsocialsafetynetsduringshocks.It
isnotpossibletoneutraliseshockssotherewillbeimpactsfrom
changesinpricesandeconomicactivity.Somecountrieshave
respondedtotheRussia–Ukrainewarinsocialprotectionterms,
mostlythroughcashtransfersandsubsidies,butsuch
interventionsarenotenough.Giventhedistributionalimpactsof
increasesinpricesandpovertyincidenceinducedbythewar,
thereisaneedformoreproactiveandtargetedsocialsupportforwomen,vulnerablegroupsandpoorhouseholds;theextensionofcreditfacilitiestomarginalisedsmallholderfarmers;andthe
scaling-upofsocialsecurityforworkers.
3Proactivemonetarypoliciestoarrestthefinancialspilloversofshocks.Thecasestudiesshowthat,whilesomecentralbanks(e.g.EgyptandSouthAfrica)respondedfastattheonsetoftheRussia–Ukrainewar,othersrespondedlater.Africancentral
banksmayneedtohaveproactivemeasuresinplacetocounter
inflationarypressures(andexchangeratepass-throughto
inflation)stemmingfromexternalshocks.Suchmeasuresmay
includeinterestrateadjustmentsandmacroprudentialtools.
However,centralbanksshouldalsobecautiousaboutthe
implicationsofdeployingsuchtools;forinstance,higherpolicy
ratescanleadtohigherborrowingcostsandaslowdownin
domesticinvestment.Inaddition,theremaybeaneedto
establishsustainableexchangerateregimesthatbetterabsorb
shocksandimprovethecompetitivenessofexports.
4Tradecreationanddiversificationoffood,fertilisersand
energysources.Initialtradepolicyresponsestothewarinthe
formofexportbanswerenottheoptimalinterventiontosecure
domesticfoodsupply.Instead,thestudieshighlightthe
importanceofenhancingregionalandbilateraltradetoreduce
susceptibilitytocommodityshocksandtheirimpactonfood
securityinAfrica.Thisappliestothetradingofstaplefoodsand
inputsforagriculturalproductionanddistribution(e.g.fertiliser,
fuel)necessaryforfoodsecurity.Oneapproachwouldbe
13
investingintradecorridors,toreducetradetransportationcosts
andenhanceefficiency.Thiscanbesupplementedbybilateral
strategicengagementstocovertheareasoftradeandinvestmentfacilitation,tradeinfrastructureandcapacity-building.
Strengtheningintra-AfricantradethroughtheAfricanContinentalFreeTradeAreamarketcanalsopromote,expandanddiversifyregionaltradeandinvestmentinagricultureandenergy,andhelpraiserealpercapitaincometoliftmillionsoutofextremepoverty.
5Boostingefficientdomesticagriculturalandfertiliser
production.Implementingmeasurestoimproveagricultural
productivitycanhelpreducedependencyonimportsand
susceptibilitytoglobalcommoditypriceshocks.Measurescould
involveincreasinginvestmentinagriculturalandfertiliserresearchanddevelopment,improvingaccesstomodernand
environmentallysustainablefarmingtechniquesandtechnologies,supportingsmallholderfarmersoradoptingacomprehensive
agriculturalsectordevelopmentstrategy.
Meanwhile,thereisroomtoenhancetheroleofinternational
financinginstitutionsinshockmanagementandeconomic
recovery.Fiscalresourceshavebeensqueezedbytheoverlapping
shocksofCovid-19andtheRussia–Ukrainewar.Inaddition,the
recentglobalfinancialtighteningisincreasingthecostofborrowing
anddebtservicing.AsofAugust2023,21Africancountriesareat
highriskof,oralreadyin,debtdistress,andprogressonsecuring
debttreatmenthasbeenslow.Highdebtservicinglowersresources
forspendingonsocialservicesandpublicinvestment.Thereisa
needtoconsiderhowinternationalfinancinginstitutionscanprovide
speedier,moreflexibleandhigherfinancingthatiscommensurate
withthemagnitudeoftheshocks.Butitisnotjustthelevelof
financing:thedirectionalsomatters.Anareaofpolicydebatethus
relatestohowtheIMFandWorldBank(andotherglobalfinancial
institutionsandcreditors)candomoretofinancetargetedgrowth,
throughpoliciestohelpsaveAfrica’sgrowthanddevelopment
trajectoryfromscarringeffects.
14
1Introduction
AfricawasstilldealingwiththelingeringeffectsofCOVID-19when
theoutbreakoftheRussia–Ukrainewarin2022causedglobal
economicdisruptionsthathampereditseconomicrecovery.The
tradedisruptionsfromthewarledtohigherglobalcommodityprices,especiallyinfood,fuelandfertilisers,duringthefirsthalfof2022.TheincreaseincommoditypricestriggeredinflationarypressuresinmanyAfricancountriesandglobally.Toarrestinflation,centralbanks
tightenedtheirinterestrates,whichledtocapitaloutflows,higher
borrowingcostsandcurrencydepreciationsformanyAfrican
countries.Higherdebtserviceandexpensiveborrowingcostsfurthersqueezedlimitedfiscalspace,meaningthat,asofAugust2023,21of53Africancountrieswereathighriskoforalreadyindebtdistress.
Theoverlappingglobalshocks,combinedwithdomesticmacro-fiscalimbalancesandvulnerabilities(e.g.conflictandclimatechange
effects),arederailingAfrica’sgrowthanddevelopmentprogress.
Between2020and2023,sub-SaharanAfricaisestimatedtohave
lost4.2percentagepoints(pp)ofgrowthcomparedwithitstrajectorybeforethepandemic.2In2022,thenumberofAfricansexperiencingacutefoodinsecurityincreasedby35million,toreachatotalofabout180million(WorldBank,2023a).Meanwhile,18millionnewpoor
wereaddedin2022tohalfoftheAfricanpopulation(546million)
alreadylivinginpovertyin2021(UNECA,2023a).Progressonthe
provisionofqualityeducationandpromotinggenderequalityhas
beenslow(UNECA,2023b)andmaybehalted,givenlimitedfiscalspacefordevelopmentspendingasaresultoftherisingdebtserviceburden(UNDP,2023).
This
溫馨提示
- 1. 本站所有資源如無(wú)特殊說(shuō)明,都需要本地電腦安裝OFFICE2007和PDF閱讀器。圖紙軟件為CAD,CAXA,PROE,UG,SolidWorks等.壓縮文件請(qǐng)下載最新的WinRAR軟件解壓。
- 2. 本站的文檔不包含任何第三方提供的附件圖紙等,如果需要附件,請(qǐng)聯(lián)系上傳者。文件的所有權(quán)益歸上傳用戶所有。
- 3. 本站RAR壓縮包中若帶圖紙,網(wǎng)頁(yè)內(nèi)容里面會(huì)有圖紙預(yù)覽,若沒(méi)有圖紙預(yù)覽就沒(méi)有圖紙。
- 4. 未經(jīng)權(quán)益所有人同意不得將文件中的內(nèi)容挪作商業(yè)或盈利用途。
- 5. 人人文庫(kù)網(wǎng)僅提供信息存儲(chǔ)空間,僅對(duì)用戶上傳內(nèi)容的表現(xiàn)方式做保護(hù)處理,對(duì)用戶上傳分享的文檔內(nèi)容本身不做任何修改或編輯,并不能對(duì)任何下載內(nèi)容負(fù)責(zé)。
- 6. 下載文件中如有侵權(quán)或不適當(dāng)內(nèi)容,請(qǐng)與我們聯(lián)系,我們立即糾正。
- 7. 本站不保證下載資源的準(zhǔn)確性、安全性和完整性, 同時(shí)也不承擔(dān)用戶因使用這些下載資源對(duì)自己和他人造成任何形式的傷害或損失。
最新文檔
- 新疆師范大學(xué)《安全攻防實(shí)戰(zhàn)》2023-2024學(xué)年第一學(xué)期期末試卷
- 柯達(dá)一刻,站穩(wěn)中國(guó)案例分析
- 新疆警察學(xué)院《智能硬件與新器件》2023-2024學(xué)年第一學(xué)期期末試卷
- 燒燙傷應(yīng)急處理方案
- 《探索生命起源之謎》課件
- 警察法制進(jìn)校園
- 書(shū)畫(huà)采購(gòu)合同范例
- 監(jiān)控改造工程合同范例
- 基金公司顧問(wèn)合同范例
- 三方委托合同范例
- 2024-2025學(xué)年上學(xué)期深圳初中地理七年級(jí)期末模擬卷3
- 中國(guó)當(dāng)代文學(xué)專(zhuān)題-003-國(guó)開(kāi)機(jī)考復(fù)習(xí)資料
- 2024年廣東公需科目答案
- 中國(guó)馬克思主義與當(dāng)代思考題(附答案)
- (新版)征信知識(shí)競(jìng)賽基礎(chǔ)題庫(kù)(500題)
- 中國(guó)各大煤礦煤炭指標(biāo)
- 浙美版1-6年級(jí)美術(shù)作品與作者整理
- 國(guó)內(nèi)外有關(guān)生產(chǎn)流程優(yōu)化研究發(fā)展現(xiàn)狀
- 高標(biāo)準(zhǔn)基本農(nóng)田土地整治項(xiàng)目工程施工費(fèi)預(yù)算表
- 肺栓塞的護(hù)理PPT課件
- 高速公路施工安全布控圖
評(píng)論
0/150
提交評(píng)論