2015年考研英語閱讀手譯本_第1頁
2015年考研英語閱讀手譯本_第2頁
2015年考研英語閱讀手譯本_第3頁
2015年考研英語閱讀手譯本_第4頁
2015年考研英語閱讀手譯本_第5頁
已閱讀5頁,還剩11頁未讀, 繼續(xù)免費(fèi)閱讀

下載本文檔

版權(quán)說明:本文檔由用戶提供并上傳,收益歸屬內(nèi)容提供方,若內(nèi)容存在侵權(quán),請(qǐng)進(jìn)行舉報(bào)或認(rèn)領(lǐng)

文檔簡(jiǎn)介

2015年Text1

1---①KingJuanCarlosofSpainonceinsisted“kingsdon'tabdicate,theydieintheirsleep.“②But

embarrassingscandalsandthepopularityoftherepublicanleftintherecentEuro-electionshaveforcedhimto

eathiswordsandstanddown.

③So,doestheSpanishcrisissuggestthatmonarchyisseeingitslastdays?④Doesthatmeanthewritingison

thewallforallEuropeanroyals,withtheirmagnificentuniformsandmajesticlifestyle?

2…①TheSpanishcaseprovidesargumentsbothfbrandagainstmonarchy.②Whenpublicopinionis

particularlypolarised,asitwasfollowingtheendoftheFrancoregime,monarchscanriseabove“mere”

politicsand“embody“aspiritofnationalunity.

3一①Itisthisapparenttranscendenceofpoliticsthatexplainsmonarchs,continuingpopularityasheadsof

state.②Andalso,theMiddleEastexcepted,Europeisthemostmonarch-infestedregionintheworld,with10

kingdoms(notcountingVaticanCityandAndorra).

(3)ButunliketheirabsolutistcounterpartsintheGulfandAsia,mostroyalfamilieshavesurvivedbecausethey

allowvoterstoavoidthedifficultsearchforanon-controversialbutrespectedpublicfigure.

4一一?Evenso,kingsandqueensundoubtedlyhaveadownside.?Symbolicofnationalunityastheyclaimto

be,theirveryhistory-andsometimesthewaytheybehavetoday-embodiesoutdatedandindefensible

privilegesandinequalities.

(3)AtatimewhenThomasPikettyandothereconomistsarewarningofrisinginequalityandtheincreasing

powerofinheritedwealth,itisbizarrethatwealthyaristocraticfamiliesshouldstillbethesymbolicheartof

moderndemocraticstates.

5--@Themostsuccessfulmonarchiesstrivetoabandonorhidetheiroldaristocraticways.②Princesand

princesseshaveday-jobsandridebicycles,nothorses(orhelicopters).

(3)Evenso,thesearewealthyfamilieswhopartywiththeinternational1%,andmediaintrusivenessmakesit

increasinglydifficulttomaintaintherightimage.

6一?WhileEurope\monarchieswillnodoubtbesmartenoughtosurviveforsometimetocome,itisthe

BritishroyalswhohavemosttofearfromtheSpanishexample.

7--?ItisonlytheQueenwhohaspreservedthemonarchy'sreputationwithherratherordinary(ifwell-heeled)

grannystyle.②ThedangerwillcomewithCharles,whohasbothanexpensivetasteoflifestyleandapretty

hierarchicalviewoftheworld.

③Hehasfailedtounderstandthatmonarchieshavelargelysurvivedbecausetheyprovideaservice-as

non-controversialandnon-politicalheadsofstate.?CharlesoughttoknowthatasEnglishhistoryshows,itis

kings,notrepublicans,whoarethemonarchy'sworstenemies.

21、Accordingtothefirsttwoparagraphs,kingJuanCarlofspan.

[A]easedhisrelationshipwithhisrivals

[BJusedtoenjoyhighpublicsupport

[C]wasunpopularamongEuropeanroyals

[D]endedhisregininembarrassment

22、MonarchsarekeptasheadofstateinEuropeanmostly.

[A]togivevotersmorepublicfigurestolookupto

[B]toachieveabalancebetweentraditionandreality

[C]owingtotheirundoubtedandrespectablestatus

[D]duetotheireverlastingpoliticalembodiment

23.Whichofthefollowingisshowntobeodd,accordingtoParagraph4?

[A]Aristocrats'excessiverelianceoninheritedwealth.

[BJTheroleofthenobilityinmodemdemocracies.

[CJThesimplelifestyleofthearistocraticfamilies.

[D]Thenobility'sadherencetotheirprivileges.

24.TheBritishroyals“havemosttofear“becauseCharles.

[A]failstoadapthimselftohisfuturerole.

[B]failstochangehislifestyleasadvised.

[C]takesrepublicansashispotentialallies.

[D]takesatoughlineonpoliticalissues.

25.Whichofthefollowingisthebesttitleofthetext?

[A]Carlos,GloryandDisgraceCombined

[BJCharles,AnxioustoSucceedtotheThrone

[CJCarlos,aLessonforAllEuropeanMonarchs

[D]Charles,SlowtoReacttotheComingThreats

2015年Text2

1---@JusthowmuchdoestheConstitutionprotectyourdigitaldata?②TheSupremeCourtwillnowconsider

whetherpolicecansearchthecontentsofamobilephonewithoutawanantifthephoneisonorarounda

personduringanarrest.

2-?Californiahasaskedthejusticestorefrainfromasweepingruling,particularlyonethatupsetstheold

assumptionthatauthoritiesmaysearchthroughthepossessionsofsuspectsatthetimeoftheirarrest.②Itis

hard,thestateargues,forjudgestoassesstheimplicationsofnewandrapidlychangingtechnologies.

3一①ThecourtwouldberecklesslymodestifitfollowedCalifornia'sadvice.②Enoughoftheimplications

arediscernable,evenobvious,sothatthejusticescanandshouldprovideupdatedguidelinestopolice,lawyers

anddefendants.

4--①TheyshouldstartbydiscardingCalifornia'slameargumentthatexploringthecontentsofasmartphone

—avaststorehouseofdigitalinformation-issimilarto,say,goingthroughasuspect'spurse.

②Thecourthasruledthatpolicedon'tviolatetheFourthAmendmentwhentheygothroughthewalletor

pocketbookofanarresteewithoutawarrant.③Butexploringone'ssmartphoneismorelikeenteringhisor

herhome.

④Asmartphonemaycontainanarrestee'sreadinghistory,financialhistory,medicalhistoryand

comprehensiverecordsofrecentcorrespondence.⑤Thedevelopmentof“cloudcomputing,meanwhile,has

madethatexplorationsomuchtheeasier.

5-一?Americansshouldtakestepstoprotecttheirdigitalprivacy.②Butkeepingsensitiveinformationon

thesedevicesisincreasinglyarequirementofnormallife.

?CitizensstillhavearighttoexpectprivatedocumentstoremainprivateandprotectedbytheConstitution's

prohibitiononunreasonablesearches.

6一?Assooftenisthecase,statingthatprincipledoesn'teasethechallengeofline-drawing.②Inmanycases,

itwouldnotbeoverlyburdensomeforauthoritiestoobtainawarranttosearchthroughphonecontents.

③TheycouldstillinvalidateFourthAmendmentprotectionswhenfacingsevere,urgentcircumstances,and

theycouldtakereasonablemeasurestoensurethatphonedataarenoterasedoralteredwhilewaitingfora

warrant.

@Thecourt,though,maywanttoallowroomforpolicetocitesituationswheretheyareentitledtomore

freedom.

7--①ButthejusticesshouldnotswallowCalifornia'sargumentwhole.②New,disruptivetechnology

sometimesdemandsnovelapplicationsoftheConstitution'sprotections.

③OrinKerr,alawprofessor,comparestheexplosionandaccessibilityofdigitalinformationinthe21stcentury

withtheestablishmentofautomobileuseasavirtualnecessityoflifeinthe20th:Thejusticeshadtospecify

novelrulesforthenewpersonaldomainofthepassengercarthen;theymustsortouthowtheFourth

Amendmentappliestodigitalinformationnow.

26.TheSupremecourtwillworkoutwhether,duringanarrest,itislegitimateto.

[A]preventsuspectsfromdeletingtheirphonecontents

[B]searchforsuspects,mobilephoneswithoutawarrant

[CJchecksuspects'phonecontentswithoutbeingauthorized

[D]prohibitsuspectsfromusingtheirmobilephones

27.Theauthor'sattitudetowardCalifornia'sargumentisoneof.

[A]disapproval[B]indifference[C]tolerance[D]cautiousness

28.Theauthorbelievesthatexploringone'sphonecontentiscomparableto.

[A]goingthroughone'swallet

[B]handlingone'shistoricalrecords

[CJscanningone'scorrespondences

[D]gettingintoone'sresidence

29.InParagraph5and6,theauthorshowshisconcernthat.

[A]principlesarehardtobeclearlyexpressed

[BJthecourtisgivingpolicelessroomforaction

[C]phonesareusedtostoresensitiveinformation

[D]citizens,privacyisnoteffectiveprotected

30.OrinKerr'scomparisonisquotedtoindicatethat.

[A]theConstitutionshouldbeimplementedflexibly

[B]principlesoftheConstitutionshouldneverbealtered

?California'sargumentviolatesprinciplesoftheConstitution

[DJnewtechnologyrequiresreinterpretationoftheConstitution

2015年Text3

1一-@ThejournalScienceisaddinganextraroundofstatisticalcheckstoitspeer-reviewprocess,

editor-in-chiefMarciaMcNuttannouncedtoday.

②Thepolicyfollowssimilareffortsfromotherjournals,afterwidespreadconcernthatbasicmistakesindata

analysisarecontributingtotheirreproducibilityofmanypublishedresearchfindings.

2---①uReadersmusthaveconfidenceintheconclusionspublishedinourjoumal,,,writesMcNuttinan

editorial.?WorkingwiththeAmericanStatisticalAssociation,thejournalhasappointedsevenexpertstoa

statisticsboardofreviewingeditors(SBoRE).

?Manuscriptswillbeflaggedupforadditionalscrutinybythejournal'sinternaleditors,orbyitsexisting

BoardofReviewingEditorsorbyoutsidepeerreviewers.@TheSBoREpanelwillthenfindexternal

statisticianstoreviewthesemanuscripts.

3-???Askedwhetheranyparticularpapershadimpelledthechange,McNuttsaid:"Thecreationofthe

'statisticsboard'wasmotivatedbyconcernsbroadlywiththeapplicationofstatisticsanddataanalysisin

scientificresearchandispartofScience'soveralldrivetoincreasereproducibilityintheresearchwepublish.^^

4一①GiovanniParmigiani,abiostatisticianattheHarvardSchoolofPublicHealth,amemberoftheSBoRE

group,saysheexpectstheboardto“playprimarilyanadvisoryrole.”

②Heagreedtojoinbecausehe“foundtheforesightbehindtheestablishmentoftheSBoREtobenovel,

uniqueandlikelytohavealastingimpact.

③ThisimpactwillnotonlybethroughthepublicationsinScienceitself,buthopefullythroughalargergroup

ofpublishingplacesthatmaywanttomodeltheirapproachafterScience."

5一?Johnloannidis,aphysicianwhostudiesresearchmethodologyatStanfordUniversityinCalifornia,says

thatthepolicyis“amostwelcomestepforward"and"longoverdue^^.@44Mostjournalsareweakinstatistical

review,andthisdamagesthequalityofwhattheypublish.

③Ithinkthat,forthemajorityofscientificpapersnowadays,statisticalreviewismoreessentialthanexpert

review,“hesays.@ButhenotedthatbiomedicaljournalssuchasAnnalsofInternalMedicine,theJournalof

theAmericanMedicalAssociationandTheLancetpaystrongattentiontostatisticalreview.

6一?Professionalscientistsareexpectedtoknowhowtoanalysedata,butstatisticalerrorsarealarmingly

commoninpublishedresearch,accordingtoDavidVaux,acellbiologist.

?Researchersshouldimprovetheirstandards,hewroteinNaturein2012,butjournalsshouldalsotakea

tougherline,t4engagingreviewerswhoarestatisticallyliterateandeditorswhocanverifytheprocess95.

③VauxsaysthatScience'sideatopasssomepaperstostatisticians“hassomemerit,butaweaknessisthatit

reliesontheboardofreviewingeditorstoidentify'thepapersthatneedscrutiny,inthefirstplace”.

31.ItcanbelearnedfromParagraphIthat.

[A]Scienceintendstosimplifyitspeer-reviewprocess.

[BJjournalsarestrengtheningtheirstatisticalchecks.

[CJfewjournalsareblamedformistakesindataanalysis.

[D]lackofdataanalysisiscommoninresearchprojects.

32.Thephrase“flaggedup”(Para.2)istheclosestinmeaningto

[A]found.[B]revised.[C]marked[D]stored

33.GiovanniParmigianibelievesthattheestablishmentoftheSBoREmay

[A]poseathreattoallitspeers

[B]meetwithstrongopposition

[C]increaseScience'scirculation.

[D]setanexampleforotherjournals

34.DavidVauxholdsthatwhatScienceisdoingnow.

[A]addstoresearchers1workload.

IB]diminishestheroleofreviewers.

[C]hasroomforfurtherimprovement.

[D]istofailintheforeseeablefuture.

35.Whichofthefollowingisthebesttitleofthetext?

[A]ScienceJoinsPushtoScreenStatisticsinPapers

[BJProfessionalStatisticiansDeserveMoreRespect

[C]DataAnalysisFindsItsWayontoEditors5Desks

[D]StatisticiansAreComingBackwithScience

2015年Text4

1…①Twoyearsago,RupertMurdoch'sdaughter,Elisabeth,spokeofthe"unsettlingdearthofintegrityacross

somanyofourinstitutions^^.

?Integrityhadcollapsed,sheargued,becauseofacollectiveacceptancethattheonly“sortingmechanism^^in

societyshouldbeprofitandthemarket.③But“it'sus,humanbeings,wethepeoplewhocreatethesocietywe

want,notprofit

2…①Drivingherpointhome,shecontinued:"It'sincreasinglyapparentthattheabsenceofpurpose,ofa

morallanguagewithingovernment,mediaorbusinesscouldbecomeoneofthemostdangerousgoalsfor

capitalismandfreedom.

②ThissameabsenceofmoralpurposewaswoundingcompaniessuchasNewsInternational,shethought,

makingitmorelikelythatitwouldloseitswayasithadwithwidespreadillegaltelephonehacking.

3--①Asthehackingtrialconcludes—findingguiltyoneex-editoroftheNewsoftheWorld,AndyCoulson,

forconspiringtohackphones,andfindinghispredecessor,RebekahBrooks,innocentofthesamecharge-

thewiderissueofdearthofintegritystillstands.

?Journalistsareknowntohavehackedthephonesofupto5,500people.③Thisishackingonanindustrial

scale,aswasacknowledgedbyGlennMulcaire,themanhiredbytheNewsoftheWorldin2001tobethepoint

personforphonehacking.?Othersawaittrial.⑤Thissagastillunfolds.

4…①Inmanyrespects,thedearthofmoralpurposeframesnotonlythefactofsuchwidespreadphonehacking

butthetermsonwhichthetrialtookplace.

②OneoftheastonishingrevelationswashowlittleRebekahBrooksknewofwhatwentoninhernewsroom,

howlittleshethoughttoaskandthefactthatsheneverinquiredwowthestoriesarrived.③Thecoreofher

successfuldefencewasthatsheknewnothing.

5--?Intoday'sworld,ithasbecomenormalthatwell-paidexecutivesshouldnotbeaccountablefbrwhat

happensintheorganizationsthattheyrun.?Perhapsweshouldnotbesosurprised.

(3)Forageneration,thecollectivedoctrinehasbeenthatthesortingmechanismofsocietyshouldbeprofit.④

Thewordsthathavematteredareefficiency,flexibility,shareholdervalue,business-friendly,wealthgeneration,

sales,impactand,innewspapers,circulation.

?Wordsdegradedtothemarginhavebeenjusticefairness,tolerance,proportionalityandaccountability.

6■一?ThepurposeofeditingtheNewsoftheWorldwasn

溫馨提示

  • 1. 本站所有資源如無特殊說明,都需要本地電腦安裝OFFICE2007和PDF閱讀器。圖紙軟件為CAD,CAXA,PROE,UG,SolidWorks等.壓縮文件請(qǐng)下載最新的WinRAR軟件解壓。
  • 2. 本站的文檔不包含任何第三方提供的附件圖紙等,如果需要附件,請(qǐng)聯(lián)系上傳者。文件的所有權(quán)益歸上傳用戶所有。
  • 3. 本站RAR壓縮包中若帶圖紙,網(wǎng)頁內(nèi)容里面會(huì)有圖紙預(yù)覽,若沒有圖紙預(yù)覽就沒有圖紙。
  • 4. 未經(jīng)權(quán)益所有人同意不得將文件中的內(nèi)容挪作商業(yè)或盈利用途。
  • 5. 人人文庫網(wǎng)僅提供信息存儲(chǔ)空間,僅對(duì)用戶上傳內(nèi)容的表現(xiàn)方式做保護(hù)處理,對(duì)用戶上傳分享的文檔內(nèi)容本身不做任何修改或編輯,并不能對(duì)任何下載內(nèi)容負(fù)責(zé)。
  • 6. 下載文件中如有侵權(quán)或不適當(dāng)內(nèi)容,請(qǐng)與我們聯(lián)系,我們立即糾正。
  • 7. 本站不保證下載資源的準(zhǔn)確性、安全性和完整性, 同時(shí)也不承擔(dān)用戶因使用這些下載資源對(duì)自己和他人造成任何形式的傷害或損失。

評(píng)論

0/150

提交評(píng)論