版權(quán)說(shuō)明:本文檔由用戶提供并上傳,收益歸屬內(nèi)容提供方,若內(nèi)容存在侵權(quán),請(qǐng)進(jìn)行舉報(bào)或認(rèn)領(lǐng)
文檔簡(jiǎn)介
PAGE
10
26
DiffusionofInnovations
EverettM.Rogers
UniversityofNewMexico
ArvindSinghal
UniversityofTexas–ElPaso
andMargaretM.Quinlan
OhioUniversity
AchapterinDonStacksandMichaelSalwen(Eds)(inpress).Anintegratedapproachtocommunicationtheoryandresearch.NewYork:Routledge.
EverettM.RogersandDiffusionofInnovations
Thischapterisdedicatedtoourseniorco-authorEverettM.Rogers,aprolificscholarofcommunicationandsocialchangeandawonderfulhumanbeing,whopassedawayinAlbuquerque,NMinOctober2004(Photo26-1).Bestknownforhisbook,DiffusionofInnovations(publishedinthefiftheditionin2003),EvRogers’life–all73years–representedacuriousengagementwiththetopicofinnovationdiffusion.
ThestorybeginsonthefamilyPinehurstFarminCarroll,Iowa,whereEvRogerswasbornonMarch6,1931
1
.TheGreatDepressionwasraging,andlifeonPinehurstFarmwastoughforeveryone,especiallyforayoungEv,whowasresponsibleforcarryingoutsuchdailychoresasmilkingcows,feedingchickens,andcleaningthebarn.Evcreditedthatdailyhardworkethic,learnedearlyonanIowafarm,tohisillustriousscholarlycareer,completewith36books,over300peer-reviewedessays,andcountless
researchreports.
WhowouldnowbelievethatEvalmostneverwenttoCollege?HewouldhavestayedhomeandfarmedifitwerenotforPepMartens,ahighschoolteacher,whopackedabunchofpromisingseniorsinhiscaranddrovethemtoAmes,Iowa,thehomeofIowaStateUniversity.ItwasEv’sfirstvisittoAmes,located60milesfromthefamilyfarm.EvlikedAmes,anddecidedtopursueadegreeinagriculture.
IowaStateinthoseyearshadgreatintellectualtraditioninagricultureandinruralsociology.NumerousagriculturalinnovationsweregeneratedbyscientistsatIowaState.Ruralsociologists–includingBryceRyanandGeorgeBeal,Ev’sdoctoraladvisor--wereconductingpioneeringstudiesonthediffusionoftheseinnovations--likethehigh-yieldinghybridseedcorn,chemicalfertilizers,andweedsprays.Questionswerebeingaskedaboutwhydosomefarmersadopttheseinnovations,andsomedon’t?ThesequestionsintriguedEv.
Atthefarm,Evremembersthathisfatherlovedelectro-mechanicalfarminnovations;butwasresistanttobiological-chemicalinnovationssuchasthenewhybridseedcorn,eventhoughityielded20percentmorecrop,andwasresistanttodrought.
However,duringtheIowadroughtof1936,whilethehybridseedcornstoodtallontheneighbors’farm;thecropontheRogers’farmwilted.Ev’sfatherwasfinallyconvinced.Ittookhimeightyearstomakeuphismind.
Thesequestionsaboutinnovationdiffusion,includingthestrongresistances,andhowtheycouldbeovercome,formedthecoreofEv’sgraduateworkatIowaStateUniversityinthemid-1950s.Ev’sdoctoraldissertationsoughttoanalyzethediffusionofthe2-4-Dweedspray(andaclusterofotheragriculturalinnovations)inCollins,Iowa,acommunityclosetoPinehurstFarm.Inthereviewofliteraturechapter,Evreviewedtheexistingstudiesofthediffusionofallkindsofinnovations--agriculturalinnovations,educationalinnovations,medicalinnovations,andmarketinginnovations.Hefoundseveralsimilaritiesinthesestudies.Forinstance,innovationstendtodiffusefollowinganS-Curveofadoption.
In1962,Evpublishedthisreviewofliteraturechapter,greatlyexpanded,enhanced,andrefined,astheDiffusionofInnovationsbook.Hearguedthatdiffusionwasageneralprocess,notboundbythetypeofinnovationstudied,bywhotheadopterswere,orbyplaceorculture.Byreviewingdiffusionstudiesacrossarangeofdisciplines,heconcludedthatthediffusionprocessdisplayedpatternsandregularities,acrossarangeofconditions,innovations,andcultures(Rogers,2004).
Thebookprovidedacomprehensivetheoryofhowinnovationsdiffused,orspread,inasocialsystem.Thebook’sappealwasglobal(Hornik,2004).Itstimingwasuncanny.Nationalgovernmentsofnewly-independentcountriesofAsia,Africa,andLatinAmericawerewrestlingwithhowtodiffuseagricultural,health,andfamilyplanninginnovationsintheirnewly-independentcountries(Barker,2004;Bertrand,2004;Haider&Kreps,2004;Murphy,2004).Herewasatheorythatwasuseful.Duringthe
1960sand1970s,foreverycopyofDiffusionofInnovationsthatwaspurchasedintheU.S.,EvestimatedthatfourwerebeingpurchasedincountriesofAsia,Africa,andLatinAmerica.
WhenthefirsteditionofDiffusionofInnovationswaspublished,Evwas31-yearsold.Buthehadalsobecomeaworld-renownedacademicfigure.AspertheSocialScienceCitationIndex,DiffusionofInnovationsisthesecondmostcitedbookinthesocialsciences.
NotbadforanIowafarmboywhoalmostdidnotgotocollege!
WhatisDiffusion?
WhentheWorldHealthOrganizationlaunchedaworldwidecampaigntoeradicatesmallpox,itwasengagedindiffusion.WhenApplelaunchedI-POD,itwasdiffusinganewproduct.WhenBobDylanwrote“TheTimesTheyAreA-Changin,’”hewasdescribingdiffusion(Dearing&Meyer,2006).Whenprofessionaldancers–bothstandingupandsittingdown(inwheelchairs)--performonstage,asdotheartistesoftheDancingWheelsdancecompanyinCleveland,theyarediffusinganewimageofwhatconstitutes(dis)ability
2
.
Diffusionistheprocessbywhichaninnovationiscommunicatedthroughcertainchannelsovertimeamongthemembersofasocialsystem(Rogers,2003).Aninnovationisanidea,practice,orobjectperceivedasnewbyanindividualorotherunitofadoption.Thediffusionprocesstypicallyinvolvesbothmassmediaandinterpersonalcommunicationchannels.And,intoday’sworld,informationtechnologiessuchastheInternetandcellphones–whichcombineaspectsofmassmediaandinterpersonalchannels,representformidabletoolsofdiffusion(Morris&Ogan,1996).Considerthefollowingexperienceofco-authorSinghalinthePhilippines.
InMay2006,asSinghalstrolleddownEpifaniodelosSantasAvenue(knownas“Edsa”)inManila,Philippines,aFilipinacolleaguenotedthat“EdsawasthestreetwherethegovernmentofPresidentEstradawasbroughtdownbycellphones.
3
”GraspingthepuzzledexpressiononSinghal’sface,sheelaborated:“Somefiveyearsago,atextmessageappearedonmycellphone.Itsaid‘Go2EDSA.’”Withinafewhours,EdsawasteemingwithtensofthousandsofFilipinoswhohadreceivedthesamemessage.
TheyweredemonstratingagainstthecorruptEstradaregime.Withinafewdays,thecrowdswelledtooveramillion.Estradawastoppled.
UponreturningtotheU.S.,authorSinghal’sInternetsearchrevealedthatinJanuary2001,theimpeachmenttrialagainstPresidentEstradawashaltedbysenatorswhosupportedhim.Withinminutes,usingcellphones,theoppositionleadersbroadcastatextmessage“Go2EDSA.Wearblck”tofolksontheirtelephonelists.Therecipients,inturn,forwardedthemessagetoothers.Therapid(almostinstant)diffusionofatextmessageledthemilitarytowithdrawsupport;thegovernmentfellwithoutasingleshotbeingfired.
AfterreadingthestoryontheInternet,Singhalforwardeditbyemailtothe28undergraduatestudentsenrolledinhisCommunicationandInformationDiffusionclassatOhioUniversity,askingthemtoshareitwithinterestedfamilyandfriends.Manydid.SohereweseehowaninnocuousinterpersonalexchangeonastreetinManila--abouttheconsequentialspreadofanSMSmessage–wasitselfdiffusedfromasinglesource(theinstructorofacourse)tomanyrecipientsand,inturn,toothersinmultiplecascadingdiffusionwaves.
Thischapteranalyzestheresearchtraditionofthediffusionofinnovations,focusingontheoriginsofthediffusionparadigm,itsmethodologicaltenets,anditsinfluenceoncommunicationresearch.Weidentifythedistinctiveaspectsofdiffusionresearch,detailtheseminalIowahybridseedcornstudy,explainthestrengthsandlimitationsofthedominantparadigmthatguideddiffusionstudyforseveraldecades,andlookintothefutureofdiffusionpracticeandresearch.Weendourchapterbydiscussingthepositivedevianceapproachwhich,webelieve,providesanalternative(“inside-out”)wayofthinkingaboutdiffusinginnovations,andonethatcapitalizesonpeoples’indigenouswisdom.
DistinctiveAspectsofDiffusionResearch
Severaldistinctiveaspectsofthediffusionofinnovationssetitofffromotherspecializedfieldsofcommunicationstudy.
ThestudyofthediffusionofinnovationsbeganduringWorldWarII,priortotheestablishmentofcommunicationstudyinuniversityschoolsanddepartments(Rogers,2003).Sodiffusionresearchwaswellunderwayasaresearchactivitybeforecommunicationscholarsenteredthisresearchfront.
Althoughmostobserversagreethatthediffusionofinnovationsisfundamentallyacommunicationprocess,communicationscholarsconstituteonlyoneofthedozenresearchtraditionspresentlyadvancingthediffusionfield(alongwithgeography,education,marketing,publichealth,ruralsociology,agriculturaleconomics,generaleconomics,politicalscience,andothers).Othercommunicationresearchareassuchaspersuasionandattitudechangeandmasscommunicationeffectsalsobeganpriortotheinstitutionalizationofcommunicationstudyinuniversityunits(Rogers,1962,1983,1995;2003;Singhal&Dearing,2006).
Diffusionresearchisalsodistinctiveinthatthecommunicationmessagesofstudyareperceivedasnewbytheindividualreceivers.Thisnoveltynecessarilymeansthatanindividualexperiencesahighdegreeofuncertaintyinseekinginformationabout,anddecidingtoadoptandimplementaninnovation.Inthesenseofthenewnessofthemessagecontent,thediffusionofinnovationsisunlikeanyothercommunicationstudyexceptthediffusionofnews.Diffusionofnews,however,studiesthespreadofnewsevents,concentratingmainlyonsuchmattersashowwebecomeawareofnews.Incontrast,researchonthediffusionofinnovationscentersnotonlyonawareness-knowledge,butalsoonattitudechange,decision-making,andimplementationoftheinnovation.Thenewideasinvestigatedbyscholarsofthediffusionofinnovationsare
mainlytechnologicalinnovations,sothebehaviorstudiedisquitedifferentfromthatinvestigatedinnewsdiffusionstudies.Obviously,however,bothcommunicationresearchareasinvolveasimilardiffusionprocess,andbothhavebeeninformedbytheother(Rogers,2003).
Diffusionresearchconsiderstimeasavariabletoamuchgreaterdegreethandootherfieldsofcommunicationstudy.Timeisinvolvedindiffusionin(a)theinnovation-decisionprocess,thementalprocessthroughwhichanindividualpassesfromfirstknowledgeofanewidea,toadoptionandconfirmationoftheinnovation;(b)innovativeness,thedegreetowhichanindividualisrelativelyearlierinadoptingnewideasthanothermembersofasystem;and(c)aninnovation’srateofadoption,therelativespeedwithwhichaninnovationisadoptedbymembersofasystem(Rogers,2003).
Thediffusionofinnovationsfieldemphasizesinterpersonalcommunicationnetworksmorethananyothertypeofcommunicationresearch.Fromthefirstdiffusionstudiesconductedabout60yearsago,thenatureofdiffusionwasfoundtobeessentiallyasocialprocessinvolvinginterpersonalcommunicationamongsimilarindividuals(Rogers&Kincaid,1981;Rosen,2002;Valente,1995;2006).Apersonevaluatesanewideaanddecideswhetherornottoadoptitonthebasisofdiscussionswithpeerswhohavealreadyadoptedorrejectedtheinnovation.Themainfunctionofmassmediacommunicationinthediffusionprocessistocreateawareness-knowledgeabouttheinnovation.Studyofthediffusionofinnovationsinvolvesbothmasscommunicationandinterpersonalcommunication,andthusspansthedichotomythatotherwisedividescommunicationintotwosub-disciplines.ThesedichotomiesblurfurtherwhendiffusionoccursthroughtheInternet,cellphones,andblackberrydevices.
BackgroundofDiffusionResearch
Thestudyofthediffusionofinnovationsinitspresent-dayformcanbetracedfromthetheoriesandobservationsofGabrielTarde,aFrenchsociologistandlegalscholar(Rogers,2003).Tardeoriginatedsuchkeydiffusionconceptsasopinionleadership,theS-curveofdiffusion,andtheroleofsocioeconomicstatusininterpersonaldiffusion,althoughhedidnotusesuchconceptsbythesenames.SuchtheoreticalideasweresetforthbyTarde(1903)inhisbook,TheLawsofImitation.
TheintellectualleadssuggestedbyTardeweresoonfollowedupbyanthropologists,whobeganinvestigatingtheroleoftechnologicalinnovationsinbringingaboutculturalchange.IllustrativeoftheseanthropologicalstudieswasClarkWissler’s(1923)analysisofthediffusionofthehorseamongthePlainsIndians.Asinotheranthropologicalworks,theemphasiswasontheconsequencesofinnovation.Forexample,Wissler(1923)showedthataddinghorsestotheircultureledthePlainsIndians,whohadlivedinpeacefulcoexistence,intoastateofalmostcontinualwarfarewithneighboringtribes.
ThebasicresearchparadigmforthediffusionofinnovationscanbetracedtoBryceRyanandNealC.Gross’sclassic1943studyofthediffusionofhybridseedcornamongIowafarmers.Thisinvestigationwasgroundedinpreviouslyconductedanthropologicaldiffusionwork,whichRyanhadstudiedwhileearninghisdoctoraldegreeatHarvardUniversity,priortobecomingafacultymemberinruralsociologyatIowaStateUniversity,whereGrosswasagraduatestudent.Wediscussthehybridcornstudyindetaillaterinthischapter.
Duringthe1950smanydiffusionstudieswereconducted,particularlybyruralsociologistsatland-grantuniversitiesinthemidwesternUnitedStates.TheyweredirectlyinfluencedbytheRyanandGrossinvestigation.Assoonascommunicationstudybegantobeinstitutionalized,thisnewbreedofscholarsbecameespeciallyinterestedinthediffusionofnewsevents,particularlythroughaninfluentialstudybyPaulJ.DeutschmannandWayneA.Danielson(1960).
CommunicationResearchonDiffusion
Deutschmann,aformernewspaperreporterandeditor,earnedhisPh.D.incommunicationatStanfordUniversity,gainingcompetenceinquantitativemethods,communicationtheory,andsocialpsychology.HebecameafriendandresearchcollaboratorwithDanielson,hisfellowdoctoralstudentatStanford,andanindividualwithasimilarbackgroundofprofessionalnewspaperexperience.
EvRogersmetDanielsonin1959atthenewlyestablishedDepartmentofCommunicationatMichiganStateUniversity,whereDeutschmannshowedhimtheS-shapeddiffusioncurvesforthespreadofthenewseventsthathewasthenstudying.
ComparedtothediffusioncurvesfortheagriculturalinnovationsthatRogerswasinvestigating,thenewseventsspreadmuchmorerapidly.AsDeutschmannstatedatthetime,thiswas“damnfastdiffusion”(personalcommunication).ThankstoDeutschmannandDanielson’s(1960)articleonthediffusionofnewsevents,thisresearchtopicbecamepopularamongcommunicationscholars.Workonthistopichasebbedconsiderablyalthoughspectacularnewsevents–suchas9/11orthe2003spaceshuttleColumbiadisaster–continuetoattractscholars(Singhal,Rogers,&Mahajan,1999;Rogers&Seidel,2002).
Intheearly1960s,DeutschmannmovedtoSanJosé,CostaRica,andcollaboratedwithDr.OrlandoFalsBorda,asociologistattheNationalUniversityofColombiainBogotá,whohadbeenstudyingdiffusionpatternsintheColombianvillageofSaució,asmallAndeancommunityof71farmhouseholds.DeutschmannandFalsBorda’s(1962)diffusionstudyinSauciórepresentedoneofthefirstdiffusioninvestigationsinadevelopingnation.Soontherewouldbeseveralhundredsuchdiffusionstudies,manyconductedbycommunicationscholars.ThesixagriculturalinnovationsofstudyinSaució(suchaschemicalfertilizer,anewpotatovariety,andapesticide)hadbeenintroducedinpreviousyearsbyFalsBorda,whoactedasanagriculturalchangeagent--oronewhointroducedinnovationstothepublic.ThefamiliarS-shapedcurve
characterizedtherateofadoptionforeachoftheseinnovationsintheColombianvillage(Deutschmann&FalsBorda,1962).
Deutschmann’sstudywithFalsBordainColombiastimulatedinterestamongcommunicationscholarsinthediffusionoftechnologicalinnovations.HeattracteddoctoralstudentstoMichiganStateUniversitywhowereinterestedindiffusionresearch.WhenDeutschmann’slifewascutshortin1962,EverettRogerswashiredashisreplacementatMichiganStateUniversitytocontinuediffusionresearchindevelopingnations.Thenumberofdiffusionstudiescompletedbycommunicationscholarsexpandedrapidlysince1960.Bymid-2007,anestimated600diffusionpublicationsbycommunicationscholarswereavailableoutofthecacheof6,000diffusionstudies
4
,morethananyotherdiffusionresearchtraditionafterruralsociologyandmarketing.Unlikeruralsociologists,whoaremainlyconcernedwithagriculturalinnovations,oreducationdiffusionscholars,whoareinterestedinneweducationalinnovations(forexample,modernmathorthemulticulturalcurriculum),communicationscholarsinvestigateawiderangeofdifferenttypesoftechnologicalinnovations.Communicationscholarsareinterestedindiffusionasacommunicationprocess,independentofthetypeofinnovationsthatarediffused.
TheIowaHybridSeedCornStudy
WhenRyanarrivedinAmes,Iowa,in1938,hewasintriguedwiththescholarlyquestionofnoneconomicinfluencesoneconomicbehavior.ThisissuehadbecomeimportanttohimduringhisdoctoralstudiesintheDepartmentofSociologyatHarvardUniversity,whereRobertK.Merton,ayoungfacultymemberwhohadrecentlycompletedhisowndissertationresearchonthesociologyofscience,wasRyan’sdoctoraladvisor.TheHarvarddoctoralprograminsociologywasrelativelynew,andsomewhatinterdisciplinaryinnature.Studentsearningdegreesinsociologywereencouragedtotakecoursesineconomics,anthropology,andinsocialpsychology.ProfessorTalcottParsons,theintellectualleaderofHarvardsociology,hadbeentrainedineconomicsinEuropeandhelpedintroducethetheoriesofVilfredoParetotoAmericansociology.ThisinterdisciplinaryintellectualbackgroundwasgoodpreparationforRyan,theindividualwho,morethananyother,wastoformulatetheparadigmforresearchonthediffusionofinnovations.
IowaStateUniversitywasanagriculturalcollege,andsoRyandecidedtoinvestigatethediffusionofhybridseedcorn.ThisinnovationwasaprofoundlyimportantnewideaforIowafarmers,leadingtoincreasedcornyieldsofabout20percentperacre.RyanreceivedfundingforhisproposedstudyofthediffusionofhybridseedfromtheIowaAgriculturalExperimentStation,IowaStateUniversity’sresearchanddevelopmentorganization,whichhadplayedanimportantroleindevelopinghybridseed.ThisimportantinnovationhadspreadwidelytoIowafarmersinpreviousyears,butIowaStateadministratorswereconcernedthatsuchanobviouslyadvantageousagriculturaltechnologyhadrequiredsomanyyears(aboutadozen)forwidespreaduse.Thistypeoffrustrationonthepartofofficialswhocannotunderstandwhyaseeminglyadvantageous
innovationisnotadoptedmoreimmediatelyexplainswhymanydiffusionstudiescontinuetobesponsored.
RyancollaboratedwithseveraleconomicsprofessorsatIowaStateUniversityindesigningthehybridcornstudy,andhisfamiliaritywithanthropologicalresearchalsoaffectedthestudy’sdesign.HoweverRyanproposedtheseedcornstudymainlyasasurveyrelyingonquestionnaire-generateddata,ratherthanusingtheethnographicapproachesofthepreviousanthropologicalresearch.
Anewlyarrivedmaster’sstudentatIowaState,NealC.Gross,wasassignedasRyan’sresearchassistant.RyantoldGrossthatifhewouldpersonallyinterviewtheseveralhundredfarmersinthetwoIowacommunitiesofstudy,hecouldusethedataforhismaster’sthesis.Gross,whocamefromanurbanbackground,wasunfamiliarwiththewaysofIowafarmers.SomeonetoldGrossthatfarmersbeganworkearlyinthemorning,soheappearedatthefarmsteadofhisfirstrespondentat4a.m.
5
ThechoiceofhybridseedcornastheinnovationofstudyintheRyanandGrossinvestigationwastocastalongintellectualshadowoverfuturegenerationsofdiffusionscholarship.Hybridseedwasanoverwhelminglybeneficialinnovation,boostingcornyieldsconsiderably.Giventhesponsorshipofthehybridcornstudy,itisunderstandablethatRyanandGrosstendedtoassumethatIowafarmersoughttoadopttheinnovation,andthattherateofadoptionshouldhavebeenmorerapid.Thispro-innovationbiasstillcharacterizesmostdiffusionstudiestoday.RyanandGross(1943)indicatedtheirsurprisethatthediffusionofhybridcornrequired12yearstoreachwidespreaddiffusion,andthattheaveragefarmerneededsevenyearstoprogressfrominitialawarenessoftheinnovationtofull-scaleadoption(indicatedbyplantingallofthecornacreageonhisfarminhybridseed).
Statedanotherway,thehybridcornstudydemonstratedjusthowdifficultitwasformostindividualstoadoptaninnovation.Hybridcornhadtobepurchasedfromaseedcorncompany,atapriceperbushelnottrivialtoIowafarmersintheDepressionyears.
Further,adoptingtheinnovationmeantthatIowafarmersnolongerselectedthemorebeautiful-appearingearsofcornforuseasseedthefollowingyear.Sotheadoptionofhybridcornmeanttheunadoptionofapreviouslyexistingpractice,thevisualselectionofopen-pollinatedseed.HybridcornwasoneofthefirstofthenewwaveofscientificallybasedfarminnovationsthatweretoradicallychangethenatureofMidwesternagricultureintheensuingdecades.In1939,Iowafarmerswerenotaccustomedtoagriculturalinnovationsthatwerelatertoflowfromtheland-grantuniversitieslikeIowaStateandtheU.S.DepartmentofAgriculture.
IowaStateUniversitywastheperfectplaceforfoundingtheparadigmfordiffusionresearchinyetanothersense:AmeswastheprincipalpointofimportationfortheintroductionofstatisticalmethodsinAmerica.ThesetechniquesforquantitativedataanalysisbeganamongagriculturalstatisticianssuchasSirRonaldFisherandKarlPearsoninEngland.Theywerecreatedtotesthypothesesabouttheeffectsoffertilizers,newcropvarieties,andlivestockrations.Suchstatisticalmethodsasanalysisof
varianceandregressioncametotheUnitedStatesintheearly1930swhenSirRonaldvisitedIowaStateUniversity,wherehehelpedestablishtheStatisticalLaboratory.
GeorgeSnedecor,leaderoftheIowaStateprograminstatistics,namedtheFstatistic(fordeterminingthesignificanceofanalysesofvarianceandregression)afterFisher.
Snedecorpopularizedstatisticalmethodsforagriculturalresearchinhisbook,StatisticalMethods(1931).IowaState’sStatisticalLaboratorywentontodeveloptheareasamplingmethodswidelyusedinsurveyresearch.ProfessorsintheDepartmentofStatistics,suchasPaulG.Homemeyer,RayJ.Jessen,andSnedecor,servedasinformalconsultantstoRyaninplanningthehybridcornstudy,andthispioneeringdiffusioninvestigationwasdesignedasahighlyquantitativeanalysis,utilizingstatisticalmethodstotesthypotheses.Asnotedearlier,thiswasamarkeddeparturefromanthropologicalethnographicdiffusionresearch.
Inthelate1930ssociologicalresearchintheUnitedStateswasmovingtowardquantification,awayfromthequalitativemethodsthathadbeenpioneeredbytheChicagoSchoolinthe1915to1935era(Rogers,2003).Sociologiststhoughtthattobecomescientificwastopatternthemselvesafterthebiologicalandphysicalsciences,atleastintheirresearchmethods.Thismovetoquantificationimpliedtheuseofindividualsasunitsofresponseandasunitsofanalysis,sothatstatisticalmethods,borrowedfromagricultural-biologicalresearch,couldbeutilizedinsociologicalstudies.
RyanandGross’shybridcorndiffusionresearchexpressedthissociologicalsearchforscientificrespectabilityinitschoiceofmethods.DataweregatheredbypersonalinterviewswithallofthefarmersinthetwoIowacommunitiesofJeffersonandGrandJunction(bycoincidence,thesecommunitieswerelocatedwithin30milesofwhereRogersgrewuponafarm).Eachfarmerwasregardedbythetworuralsociologistsasadecision-makingunitfortheadoptionofhybridcorn.
Thefocusonindividualfarmersledtothegreatestshortcomingofthehybridcorninvestigation.SociometricquestionstomeasuretheinterpersonalnetworklinksamongtheIowafarmersofstudywerenotasked.Thismistakeisallthemorepuzzlinggiventhatdiffusionisessentiallyasocialprocess.Whilethemassmediaoftencreateawareness-knowledgeofaninnovation,interpersonalcommunicationwithpeersisnecessarytopersuademostindividualstoadoptanewidea(Rogers&Kincaid,1981).
RyanandGrossgathereddatafromacompletecensusofthefarmersinJeffersonandGrandJunction,Iowa,anidealsamplingdesignformeasuringnetworklinksandthusfordeterminingpeerinfluencesonfarmers’decisionstoadopttheinnovation.The
farmer-respondentswereaskedaboutthesourcesandchannelsfromwhichtheyfirstlearnedabouthybridcorn(commercialseeddealersandsalespeoplewerementionedasmostimportant)versusthesourcesandchannelsthatconvincedthemtoadopt(otherfarmerslikeneighborsandfriendswerereportedasmostimportant).SoRyanandGrossestablishedtheimportanceofsocialnetworksindiffusion,butfailedtoinvestigatetheminanappropriateway.
ApplyingtheDiffusionModelinSanFrancisco’sSTOPAIDSProgram
IntheearlydaysoftheAIDSepidemicinSanFrancisco,in1981and1982,considerabledisagreementexistedwithinthegayandbisexualcommunityabouthowtocopewithHIV/AIDS.By1992,anastounding48percentoftheminthiscitywereHIV-positive.SomeoutspokenindividualsquestionedwhethersexualbehaviorspreadHIV(theysuspectedthatstraightsocietywasusingtheAIDSthreattoclosetheSanFranciscobathhouses,inordertolimitthesexualfreedomofgaymen).Eventually,gayorganizationspulledtogethertocombattheepidemicthroughtheS
溫馨提示
- 1. 本站所有資源如無(wú)特殊說(shuō)明,都需要本地電腦安裝OFFICE2007和PDF閱讀器。圖紙軟件為CAD,CAXA,PROE,UG,SolidWorks等.壓縮文件請(qǐng)下載最新的WinRAR軟件解壓。
- 2. 本站的文檔不包含任何第三方提供的附件圖紙等,如果需要附件,請(qǐng)聯(lián)系上傳者。文件的所有權(quán)益歸上傳用戶所有。
- 3. 本站RAR壓縮包中若帶圖紙,網(wǎng)頁(yè)內(nèi)容里面會(huì)有圖紙預(yù)覽,若沒(méi)有圖紙預(yù)覽就沒(méi)有圖紙。
- 4. 未經(jīng)權(quán)益所有人同意不得將文件中的內(nèi)容挪作商業(yè)或盈利用途。
- 5. 人人文庫(kù)網(wǎng)僅提供信息存儲(chǔ)空間,僅對(duì)用戶上傳內(nèi)容的表現(xiàn)方式做保護(hù)處理,對(duì)用戶上傳分享的文檔內(nèi)容本身不做任何修改或編輯,并不能對(duì)任何下載內(nèi)容負(fù)責(zé)。
- 6. 下載文件中如有侵權(quán)或不適當(dāng)內(nèi)容,請(qǐng)與我們聯(lián)系,我們立即糾正。
- 7. 本站不保證下載資源的準(zhǔn)確性、安全性和完整性, 同時(shí)也不承擔(dān)用戶因使用這些下載資源對(duì)自己和他人造成任何形式的傷害或損失。
最新文檔
- 《汽車發(fā)動(dòng)機(jī)原理(第5版)》 課件 顏伏伍 第3-5章 燃料與燃燒、汽油機(jī)混合氣的形成與燃燒、柴油機(jī)混合氣的形成與燃燒
- 個(gè)性化版技術(shù)服務(wù)合同協(xié)議書(shū)范例
- 文藝演出后期制作合同
- 墻體砌筑專家分包墻體建造
- (完整版)初一圖形的初步認(rèn)識(shí)
- 第1-3單元核心素養(yǎng)拓展卷(月考)-2024-2025學(xué)年數(shù)學(xué)五年級(jí)上冊(cè)人教版
- 第八單元知識(shí)盤點(diǎn)復(fù)習(xí)-2024-2025學(xué)年統(tǒng)編版語(yǔ)文四年級(jí)上冊(cè)
- 員工培訓(xùn)研究現(xiàn)狀分析
- 甘肅省酒泉市(2024年-2025年小學(xué)四年級(jí)語(yǔ)文)人教版小升初真題(下學(xué)期)試卷及答案
- 初中數(shù)學(xué)函數(shù)課件
- 水穩(wěn)底基層開(kāi)工報(bào)告
- 輸油臂施工方案
- 化療藥物的配置規(guī)范
- 郴州人事考試網(wǎng)
- T∕CAQI 220-2021 餐(飲)具及公共用品用具表面ATP含量的測(cè)定和限值要求
- 熱風(fēng)爐爐殼及框架制作安裝施工方案
- 安徽科技學(xué)院本科生導(dǎo)師工作手冊(cè)
- 沙迪克編程代碼完整版
- 城市道路與橋梁工程專業(yè)答辯試題庫(kù)
- 學(xué)校安全管理網(wǎng)絡(luò)圖(共1頁(yè))
- 五、螺桿式制冷壓縮機(jī)組的安裝、調(diào)試和使用
評(píng)論
0/150
提交評(píng)論