《第二章對(duì)價(jià)》PPT課件.ppt_第1頁(yè)
《第二章對(duì)價(jià)》PPT課件.ppt_第2頁(yè)
《第二章對(duì)價(jià)》PPT課件.ppt_第3頁(yè)
《第二章對(duì)價(jià)》PPT課件.ppt_第4頁(yè)
《第二章對(duì)價(jià)》PPT課件.ppt_第5頁(yè)
已閱讀5頁(yè),還剩27頁(yè)未讀, 繼續(xù)免費(fèi)閱讀

下載本文檔

版權(quán)說(shuō)明:本文檔由用戶提供并上傳,收益歸屬內(nèi)容提供方,若內(nèi)容存在侵權(quán),請(qǐng)進(jìn)行舉報(bào)或認(rèn)領(lǐng)

文檔簡(jiǎn)介

1,Chapter 2 Consideration,2,“In contract law, something of legal value that has been bargained for討價(jià)還價(jià) and given in exchange by the parties.”,Consideration,3,“Promises are enforced only where the parties have exchanged something of value in the eyes of the law.”,The Doctrine of Consideration,4,Legal Value Question,What has “l(fā)egal value”? Or another way to ask it: How can we tell if something has “value in the eyes of the law”?,5,Legal Value (Answer),The promisee does or promises to do something he had no prior legal duty to do, or Refrains克制,抑制 from doing (or promises not to do) something he had a legal right to do.,6,When Mike is 16, his Mom says “Mike, youve been such a good son, Im going to give you a brand new Porsche 911 on your 18th birthday.” His 18th birthday comes and she doesnt buy him a Porsche. He sues her for the Porsche. Will he win? Why or why not?,Consideration Example,7,Hamer v. Sidway,Uncle promised to pay his nephew $5,000 if he refrained from smoking, drinking, swearing, and playing cards or billiards for money until he was 21. Nephew did so. Uncle said Ill pay you in a few years. The uncle died and his estate refused to pay. Nephew transferred his rights to Mr. Hamer Mr. Hamer sued the estate.,8,Legal Value Revisited,Another way to look at legal value is it must be either a: Legal benefit to the promisor, or a Legal detriment削減 to the promisee.,9,Exchanges That Fail to Meet Consideration Requirements,Past consideration Illusory promises Preexisting duties,10,Past Consideration,Despite its name, is not consideration at all. Because it was not bargained for in exchange, past consideration is not valid consideration. “Thanks for fixing my car stereo. I really appreciate it. Ill tell you what, Ill give you $100 when I get my next paycheck.”,11,Kelsoe v. International Wood Products,What did Carol Kelsoes supervisor at International Wood promise her? What did the trial court do? What did the Supreme Court of Alabama decide? Why?,12,Illusory Promises,An illusory promise is one that does not bind the promisor to do anything. “I promise to buy all the sugar I want.” “I promise to buy your bike for $350 if I feel like it (after looking at it.)” An illusory promise cannot serve as consideration.,13,Culbertson v. Brodsky,Did Mr. Brodsky give valid consideration that makes Culbertsons promise enforceable? Show of hands Decision Discussion,14,Requirements Contracts,Fujitsu factory #1,Fujitsu factory #2,Hewlett-Packard Factory,Semiconductors,Semiconductors,The requirements of the buyer determine the quantity exchanged.,15,A promise to supply all that another firm requires for a specified period of time Is it supported by consideration? Many common law courts said the buyers promise was illusory, since they could decide to require zero units. But with the enactment of the UCC, the law was changed to make requirements contracts enforceable.,Requirements Contracts,16,Output Contracts,Fujitsu factory #1,Hewlett-Packard Factory,Semiconductors,The manufacturing capacity of the seller determines the quantity exchanged per unit time.,17,A promise to purchase the entire output of a supplier for a specified period of time Under the common law, the sellers promise was seen as illusory, or the key term of quantity was seen as too indefinite. The UCC enforces these contracts for two reasons: 1) Because business people find them valuable, and 2) Because if the seller acts in good faith, his promise could bind.,Output Contracts,18,Preexisting Public Duties,A promise to perform a preexisting duty, whether public or private, cannot constitute consideration because the promisor already had an obligation to do it. Examples of preexisting public duties: The duty not to commit assault, battery, arson, defamation誹謗, etc.,19,Preexisting Private Duties: The General Rule,Under the common law, an agreement to modify an existing contractual obligation requires some new consideration to be enforceable. Otherwise, a person could be forced to agree to a change in contract terms that is disadvantageous to them because they have made plans and commitments.,20,Additional Work,If, on the other hand, the builder offers to finish the house on August 15th if you agree to pay an additional $60,000, then you will be bound to pay the additional $60,000!,21,Preexisting Private Duties: Exceptions to the General Rule,Unforeseen circumstances Contract rescission廢除 and substitution,22,A contract substitution consists of a rescission and a new contract A rescission must meet all the tests of a contract: agreement, consideration, legality, and capacity. Each party absolves the other party of their remaining promises. But what if one party has secretly coerced the other party?,Contract Substitution,23,Modification of contracts under the UCC,Under the UCC, an agreement to modify a contract for the sale of goods requires no consideration to be enforceable! The modification can even be ORAL even though the original contract was WRITTEN!,24,Adequacy of Consideration,Adequacy has a very different meaning than legally valuable under the law. Courts generally do not look at whether the consideration was adequate to the promise given. They dont want to second guess the bargaining decisions of the parties.,25,The courts define adequacy as “the degree to which the consideration is equal in value to the promise or item given.” Then they very clearly say that consideration need not be adequate as so defined if the two parties have freely agreed to the exchange and if the consideration was the inducement 引誘for the promise!,Adequacy of Consideration: The General Rule,26,Exceptions to the General Rule on Adequacy of Consideration,Courts may refuse to enforce disguised gift promises supported by nominal consideration. Courts may use inadequacy of consideration as evidence that there was fraud, duress逼迫, undue influence不正當(dāng)壓力, lack of capacity, or unconscionability, and may look elsewhere in the facts for additional evidence.,27,Preexisting Duty and Agreements to Settle Debts,An agreement by a creditor to accept less than what was originally agreed upon may be enforceable. Depends on the nature of the debt and whether the loan is past due or not. Liquidated debt已清算債務(wù) a debt that is both due and certain.,28,Liquidated Debts,A creditors promise to discharge a liquidated debt for part payment at or after its due date is unenforceable for lack of consideration. Example: You and your friend Felicity,29,Unliquidated Debts,Unliquidated debt: A debt for which there exists a good faith dispute about 善意的爭(zhēng)論its existence or amount. The settlement of an unliquidated debt is c

溫馨提示

  • 1. 本站所有資源如無(wú)特殊說(shuō)明,都需要本地電腦安裝OFFICE2007和PDF閱讀器。圖紙軟件為CAD,CAXA,PROE,UG,SolidWorks等.壓縮文件請(qǐng)下載最新的WinRAR軟件解壓。
  • 2. 本站的文檔不包含任何第三方提供的附件圖紙等,如果需要附件,請(qǐng)聯(lián)系上傳者。文件的所有權(quán)益歸上傳用戶所有。
  • 3. 本站RAR壓縮包中若帶圖紙,網(wǎng)頁(yè)內(nèi)容里面會(huì)有圖紙預(yù)覽,若沒(méi)有圖紙預(yù)覽就沒(méi)有圖紙。
  • 4. 未經(jīng)權(quán)益所有人同意不得將文件中的內(nèi)容挪作商業(yè)或盈利用途。
  • 5. 人人文庫(kù)網(wǎng)僅提供信息存儲(chǔ)空間,僅對(duì)用戶上傳內(nèi)容的表現(xiàn)方式做保護(hù)處理,對(duì)用戶上傳分享的文檔內(nèi)容本身不做任何修改或編輯,并不能對(duì)任何下載內(nèi)容負(fù)責(zé)。
  • 6. 下載文件中如有侵權(quán)或不適當(dāng)內(nèi)容,請(qǐng)與我們聯(lián)系,我們立即糾正。
  • 7. 本站不保證下載資源的準(zhǔn)確性、安全性和完整性, 同時(shí)也不承擔(dān)用戶因使用這些下載資源對(duì)自己和他人造成任何形式的傷害或損失。

評(píng)論

0/150

提交評(píng)論