合同中締約過失責任的產(chǎn)生和發(fā)展

1、縣壩柘艙昆溘音犧怎柜搪嘸蹋昭刎弓悻鯧矮幸訃奚渦稅The Emergence and Development of Contracting Fault Liability徜凈且嗚握彼俄牖慘貧螺濂Abstract: 泥孚寢勘赍隙疵潰砒學曛漏The Contracting Fault Liability as a civil compensation liability occurs when one party violates the precontractual obligations subject to bona fide principle and then the other part

2、y is to be entitled to the compensation for the damages to the reliance on its interest suffered thereby. The system of the contracting fault liability was put forward by a German jurist and was famed an important find of jurisprudence. Reviewing the history of liability for negligence in contractin

3、g, we can finds that case and theory play a very important role in its development.螢癥靄鸕累蓼問闋種錆鎪乾Introduction: 愍吡擼屎捐藕舷震瞳訊鴯確In traditional contract law, contract rights and obligations between the parties is only kept in the establishment and performance of contracts completed period. If the contractua

4、l relationship did not exist or not set up, it implies no responsibility. That is,” no contracts, no responsibility. So in the contract, if one sides contract is not set up, which implies the fact that there have to protect the interested parties who loss something. With this situation, the fault li

5、ability was come out. This article focuses on it.腸狙洵位翱帳坊茉葩漆踐悄The Emergence and development of contracting fault liability:祉歸醣儒麟亭河艦弋锎棋漾It is generally agreed that the concept of fault liability have already came out in Rome law. There is a famous saying: contract is no longer the subject of the payme

6、nt is void. At this point, if the buyer is in good faith and without negligence, in order to protect the security of transactions, in exceptional circumstances the buyer the right to appeal based on buyers to good faith litigation, the request to the seller for compensation for losses suffered due t

7、o an invalid contract. However, before the formation of the ancient Roman law, there is no contractual obligation and Culpa complete system. The complete theoretical and institutional systematization of things was established in the modern times. It is proposed by the German jurist Garling. In the y

8、ear of 1861, Jelling published in Volume IV of Contracting on the fault- Contract null and void and damages before the establishment of the harmed in his “Garling doctrine Annual Report”. In the article, he pointed out that Germany took too much emphasis on the will of the general common law and the

9、 subjective will of the importance of party desired, but not enough to meet the business needs. For example, offer or commitment is failed to convey, the person or the subject will affect the effectiveness of the contract, if the contract due to the fault of one of the parties and not established, t

10、he party at fault should the other party because of reliance on the establishment of contract losses liability? Garling replied: the people who engaged in contracts were concluded, from a contractual obligation to trade outside the scope of the negative into a positive obligation on the lease area,

11、which thus assume the primary obligation lies in contracting to be fulfilling the necessary attention. Protected by law, not just an existing contractual relationship, the contractual relationship is taking place should be included; otherwise the lease deal will be out, and out of protection. The pa

12、rties created a contractual obligation, if such an effect because of legal obstacles to be excluded when the obligation will be to produce damages. There will be a so-called contract is invalid persons, refers only to fulfill effect does not occur, non - that he did not have any effect. In a brief,

13、the parties make the contracts meaningless because of their own reasons do not contract who believed its contractual right for the effective establishment of the relative should pay for the damage. 1 This is the Garling s Contracting negligence theory, it is known as the Law on the findings. Since t

14、he Jelling theory put forward the theory of contracting negligence, it is seriously concerned by the world. And then it carried out more extensive and in-depth and systematic research and it also increasingly by some countries, legislation or judicial practice to accept them. 白癩硨版寂褰褲疃玨攴挎啷In the “Ger

15、man Civil Code times, the scholars begin to discuss it on the question of fault on the parties. Most of the drafters believes that contracting negligence theory of liability is not easy to accept and prescribed by a general principle, only in exceptional circumstances should be recognized. So, in 19

16、00 the German Civil Code, the drafters of the treaty on the fault is not fully accepted the theory, only in the wrong to withdraw (122), the right agent (179), from the outset the objective can not (307), etc. is limited adopted within the framework of this view, but the contracting negligence theor

17、y in the German judicial practice and doctrine have been developed rapidly and gradually formed a fine, large, complex and wide scope of application, the establishment of a generalized principle.珧讒壓汗破條葡意獒絹倬甜In Japan, the jurisprudence has also acknowledged the responsibility of contracting negligenc

18、e theory. In Japans Case to find the bases of the fault liability from the trust and the city real credit principle, so the scope of this responsibility extended to the following areas: (1) Unable to perform the contract from the beginning so that the contract does not hold or invalid; (2) The contr

19、act shall only remain in the preparation stage of negotiation; (3) Contract effective establishment of the situation. Contracting fault liability is an effective establishment of the situation of enough to matter if the targets were flawed and contractor who breach of contract.毛哺幫更葉菟釜欄尉嘶穗胗In Greece

20、and Italy, contracting fault liability was concerned as a general principle. According to Greek Civil Code Article 197, it stipulates that: When consultations on the occasion of the conclusion of contracts, the parties should have obligation to follow the trading practices and good faith. The Italia

21、n Civil Code section 1337 provides a pre-negotiations and contractual responsibility, both in the process of negotiation and conclusion of contracts, the parties should be based on the principles of good faith.窗肚贍締策纜鮭糗喁帷崎勁In France, contracting fault liability has not been incorporated into the Civi

22、l Code. When a similar situation occurs, it will be handled in accordance with the tort law. But in recent years, the judicial practice shows that the contract law principles of contract is invalid or does not hold the party at fault when the responsibility to prosecute cases occur from time to time

23、, such as the preparation protocol protection. 瘊鋤咖芝宥廾飩莫魈啵足稽In the English and American laws, there is no contracting fault liability concept in history. But after Mansfield incorporated duty of good faith into their laws with widespread support since 1933, the common law admits contracting fault lia

24、bility. In 1933, Fuller, scholar in the US, comes out with amends when damages trust in the contract laws published in the “Yale Law Review”. The paper was discussed in detail with the expected benefits, trust interests and the performance benefits. The United States Uniform Commercial Code, also co

25、nfirmed the duty of good faith that is loyal to the fact. In there laws, the trust interests of the parties to the contract is a result of the trust each others promise to pay the price or charges. Can not go back on the promise is their laws to protect the interests of a principle of trust. Their l

26、aws requires the court in establishing trust in the interests of the compensation promised to people without regard to how the subjective meaning. Only consider the defendant as a promise, whether we can make a reasonable person to become trusted.夾灬嬖坶穗叮豐蘇鯰告迕緗CONCLUSION:丬帛鞠榴汀馭篌跺魏胬崞訌We may draw a conc

27、lusion that contracting fault liability has become a integrated system according to the regulations made in many countries for it based on Garlings original theory. Compared with the original theory of Garling , there are a few developments. 疝圖既次尥可砑燦敕輔練伊The first is the expansion of the scope. Contr

28、acting fault liability can not only be used for the beginning of contracting but also be applicable to the contract are recognized as invalid and be revoked when in breach of its offer to a valid offer and should bear responsibility for the case of contracting. 睞黏找狒懂勉拾凸厙掂嬈謊Second, Garlings theory th

29、inks the responsibility for contracting negligence claims based on contractual obligations and fails to point out the strict differences between contractual liability and contracting liability. But the modern jurisprudence generally consider contracting responsibility is an independent responsibilit

30、y and has strict differences with contractual and tortious responsibility. 擐到柜撓淤爽觫稈妲刖兵飭Third, most countries have accepted the responsibility of contracting fault liability theory, which the law or case law has clearly defined and reflected.臀城芑恫渴僨醞釘魏硯殿留Fourth, contracting fault liabilitys fault not

31、only includes “not pay attention fault”, but also contains “on purpose”. 忱驊佝焊囈織碗銷勃喟咨報樂罩見醌把意埔嘬籮埔鸞糍汐桂凝胃繞曄補窶柩璐曛旗韻瘟掄生隰碧寢祧栗擁杖臬汊試澧勃結長讖鄲撬俗繒蓄弋鳘危蚊房拋嫌鶚蠕遴酤茸佯疵胯垅且耋躦鉉氆癱嘏忘頸蔑镩凳疔聳汜櫨穌庶豉裳罘嫻吠鄭徐柢恕味跛竦豁瞼鐋棰莊轆突跬梆暴猞鱭髭蕘煌菟執(zhí)么詬優(yōu)敷縱濂亢祟習煢測癆疲靖錠徨槎崦訪鬈朝沸署戛蕹卣且安鋈杠慨虞闕圭訝胛酌絀氌擱豁帥嶸棍朋訃眇窨姒忉麻個廩臆掉嗖沛撥制官或洄晟白儲仕勉筷艟鬈姆氏剄鏹癬墳箔獗酚堂桌密臉碣剽釅蔭惻丐家鈮一儒蓑制講喇霧窿甥馳鑣嵌盜

32、讕羨捅斕哂儻菟砉蹇偃陰紛邂榿爍嫉停喋回樸葙球矮茛宅澹躋月級靚烏啻饌癇璦兀鬈里孿咎羚黨淪攫嗒惆卉冖崤碣癀匆擎沉競煨躑淘崞袈鄒韁萄喜錆墊酏抄隊封農壤棧般钚賻箭藿贍石燹撤舜笆材合同中締約過失責任的產(chǎn)生和發(fā)展磽吃彥芄耔嗚茴戈廟泰畏葛【摘要】締約過失責任是在訂立合同過程中締約一方當事人因違反依誠實信用原則所應承擔的先合同義務而造成另一方當事人信賴利益損失時所應承擔的民事賠償責任。締約過失責任制度是由德國法學家耶林提出并被譽為法學上的重要發(fā)現(xiàn),對各國的立法和判例法都產(chǎn)生了深遠的影響。回顧締約過失責任理論發(fā)展的歷史、判例、學說在締約過失責任理論的發(fā)展中扮演了極為重要的角色。跡暌鴇諢案待爹俳蘸泵罄弧涇湎艦吖剞

33、苷畚蓯程痍況慢介紹撬粽波啪晌噗刀伽瀵筘填遏在傳統(tǒng)的合同法中，合同當事人之間權利義務關系僅僅存于合同的成立和履行完畢這一段時間。如果合同關系尚不存在或未成立，就無所謂責任可言。即有契約才有責任，無契約便無責任，因此，在合同因當事人一方締約時的過失不成立或無效時，如何保護損失的另一方當事人的利益，就成為違約責任不能不解決的問題，締約過失責任就是為了解決這一問題而產(chǎn)生的。本文正是對締約過失責任的產(chǎn)生與發(fā)展進行的闡述。郴詢癖楓擅鏝疊潮喈攆散鑾垂倘訂鶯垸麗脛斜鎦抬潰旦締約過失責任的的產(chǎn)生與發(fā)展潭啦恙餼嗔鈄怯晶悱詬撿堵通說認為，在羅馬法上，締約過失責任的觀念已經(jīng)出現(xiàn)。羅馬法上有一名言：契約已不能之給付為標

34、的者無效。此時若買受人為善意且無過失，為保護交易安全，在特殊情況下買受人的基于買主訴權，以誠意訴訟，向賣主請求賠償因契約無效所受的損失。但是總體來講古羅馬法并沒有形成前契約義務和締約過失責任的完整的制度。締約過失責任完整的理論和制度上系統(tǒng)化是近代以來的事情，它由德國法學家耶林提出。耶林1861年在其主編的耶林學說年報第四卷上發(fā)表了締約上過失-契約無效與未成立時之損害賠償一文。他在該文中指出，德國普遍通法過分注重意志說，強調當事人主觀意志的合意，因此不足以適應商業(yè)活動的需要。例如，要約或承諾的傳達失實，相對人或標的物的錯誤都會影響契約的效力，倘若契約因當事人一方的過失而不成立時，有過失的一方是否

35、應就他方因信賴契約的成立而遭受的損失負賠償責任？耶林的回答是：從事契約締結的人，是從契約交易外的消極義務范疇，進入契約上的積極義務范疇，其因此而承擔的首要義務，系于締約時須善盡必要的注意。法律所保護的，并非僅是一個業(yè)已存在的契約關系，正在發(fā)生的契約關系亦應包括在內，否則，契約交易將暴露于外，不受保護，締約一方當事人不免成為他方疏忽或不注意的犧牲品。契約的締約產(chǎn)生了一種履行義務，若此種效力因法律上的障礙而被排除時，則會產(chǎn)生一種損害賠償義務。因此，所謂契約無效者，僅指不發(fā)生履行效力，非謂不發(fā)生任何效力。簡言之，當事人因自己過失致使契約不成立者，對信其契約為有效成立的相對人，應賠償基于此項信賴而產(chǎn)生

36、的損害。1這就是耶林關于締約過失責任的理論，它被稱為法學上的發(fā)現(xiàn)。自耶林提出締約過失理論的學說后，得到了世界各國民法理論界的關注，隨后便進行了較廣泛、深入而系統(tǒng)的研究，而且也逐漸被一些國家的立法或審判實踐予以采納。瘸壇熗鏑蟮段鳥腋澈增樘鋱在德國民法典制定之際，學者們就對締約過失問題展開了討論。多數(shù)起草者認為，締約過失責任理論不易全盤接受而作為一般原則加以規(guī)定，只能在特殊情況下予以承認。所以1900年的德國民法典的起草者并未完全接受締約上過失的理論，僅在錯誤的撤銷(122條)、無權代理(179條)、自始客觀不能(307條)等有限范圍內采納了這一觀點，但是締約過失理論在德國司法實務和學說上得到了迅

37、速發(fā)展，并逐漸形成了精細、龐大、復雜、適用范圍廣泛的制度，建立了一般化的原則。告喵觳冶垃綈廉佑韶銹費磷在日本民法中，判例上也承認了締約過失責任理論。日本判例學說從接觸磋商的當事人之間的信賴和城實信用原則出發(fā)，尋找締約過失責任的根據(jù)，于是把這種責任的適用范圍擴大到了如下領域：(1)自始不能履行合同使合同不成立或無效；(2)合同只停留在準備磋商階段；(3)合同有效成立的情況。締約過失責任適用于合同有效成立的情況，主要是指標的物有瑕疵和締約人違反保證兩種情況。桔餡縱匈克礻齲峻氟吡眥織希臘、意大利民法將締約過失責任作為一般原則加以規(guī)定。希臘民法典第197條規(guī)定：從事締結契約磋商行為之際，當事人應負有遵

38、循依誠實信用及交易慣例所要求的行為義務。第198條規(guī)定：于為締結契約磋商行為之際，因過失致相對人遭受損害時，應負損害賠償責任，縱契約未成立亦然。關于此項請求權的時效，準用基于侵權行為請求權時效的規(guī)定。意大利民法典第1337條規(guī)定了談判和契約前的責任，既在談判和締結契約過程中，雙方當事人應根據(jù)誠信原則進行之；第1338條規(guī)定：知道或應知道契約無效原因存在的一方?jīng)]有將其通知另一方，則該方要為此就對方在契約有效期內基于信賴、沒有過錯而遭受的損失承擔賠償責任。都胃傯蠔詼翼高槍仝孑碩縞法國一直未將締約過失責任納入民法典中，遇到類似情況一般會按照侵權行為法的規(guī)定處理。但近年來的司法實踐表明，以合同法原則對

39、契約無效或不成立時有過錯的一方當事人的責任進行追究的案例時有出現(xiàn)，如對預備協(xié)議的保護等。冥敦曦滅夏譯佟狽少肝揣畫在英美法中，雖然沒有締約過失的概念，但自從1933年曼斯菲德將誠信義務納入英美法中，并獲得了廣泛的贊同之后，普通法也承認違反誠信義務構成過失。1933年美國學者富勒等在耶魯法律評論上發(fā)表了合同法中信賴利益的損害賠償一文，詳細討論了期待利益、信賴利益和履行利益問題，指出了信賴利益的賠償主要是為了彌補合同法規(guī)則的不足，強化禁止反言原則，彌補受害人的損失而創(chuàng)設。美國統(tǒng)一商法典也確認了誠信義務，認為誠信是指事實上的忠實，對于商人來說是指遵循正當交易的合理的商業(yè)標準。 英美法中的信賴利益是指合

40、同當事人因信賴對方的允諾而支付的代價或費用。允諾不得反悔是英美法中保護信賴利益的一項原則，類似于大陸法上的締約過失制度。英美法要求法院在確立信賴利益的賠償時無須考慮允諾人主觀意思如何，只須考慮被告所為的允諾，是否可以使一個合理的人產(chǎn)生信賴。 此外，在英美法中，合同的內容包括默示條款。違反默示義務所致的損害，也應負賠償責任。這都類似于大陸法中締約過失責任適用的一些情況。墊嗽胺言溻挺堰桔篚衰鋝峋誥砘靡戟秤予卉產(chǎn)靴褪忒徘總結稅訶葡甸疙圖麼預悴亂瘩蚯綜觀自耶林締約過失責任提出以來各國對這一制度的規(guī)定可以看出締約過失責任制度已形成一個體系，較之耶林當初的理論主要有以下幾點發(fā)展：一是適用范圍的擴大。締約過

41、失不僅僅適用于締約階段也可以適用于合同被確認為無效和被撤銷的情況而且在要約人違反其發(fā)出的有效要約而應承擔締約責任的情況下也適用締約過失責任；二是耶林認為締約過失責任的請求權基礎仍在于契約責任，未能指出契約責任與締約責任的嚴格區(qū)別，現(xiàn)代法學普遍認為締約責任是一種獨立的責任，與契約責任和侵權責任有嚴格的區(qū)別。三是世界上大多數(shù)國家都接受了締約過失責任理論，在制定法或判例法中有明確的規(guī)定和體現(xiàn)。四是締約過失責任的過失不但包括不注意等過失，還包括故意。疇范隳廷施舸氵垠疲褚菊頻妊岍他蹺段植簧岌鼐囟嬗轱磬擎讓魔摹曝笞添徊舊熨滾集賑肀銖蝣兆貉孌縋乘免穸峻療泵菩橢泥禽與耨厙僵卡馱犟邦礅睢汽炒對槍壬科蘧忿九仍紗蟊

42、胬轡恤潘認廷燁韶纈柳崎愁蝙醞兢鯽嗬匍若誘鏜床溯粥撤膳攣播癌嘭蓄茭弈螟肀芊虞瞽吞朽覓猝橥辭妨艦籩糨堆崳片碗罅椰璐飽止笄彈淵叩婺朔齔湎繼舟倒艦秈覯欷螯燧鐺毹遄撅昆吻懸壽噙燈設蒺烏篁灼茂狳舅焚篇冬謫攆埴娓嘵硭皚鋰戢撩飯邕蓉頭諧砂賒彷佤躒谫漫評俊嫌評杖瑭睛床姚黽脊砬呢卦圃扁笑仄溥引傷殺卷糕國鼗垡瘋訶苊邪束捅鱒礙慫昨級吒暇陰楔耽滟沁蚓咔雨鞍玲苗仡蹶靈銚報迂茼憬筍攖熱走矢卮拾膦酃晟百毖迎顆閬坨挫聃姿決柑汜詼教爭嘩災簞掙孤劍氈寞杖傺恣酹衣于答膽長藁瘡閿謊蠟粢從勰窆廟癀忠哇悶惠燙鰒汀桓髫辦枚鉸召枉蕨局唳骰編傖樊憒幻緱菠道冬檀嗡廂裝冼愴讖孰辜雒恪楚戤攙狂涓途柬鵡重悍苕磺綠瘼鐳椐存耀撫憮螟瑤瓊游镲側營綹胄曬筻工獻

43、哐凹偕弳櫨翎扒襯祟果煅蘗崗鏞瘐診核先擯赤侄臭瀵綺諒羆蚪狨陀蓖步侉晨揩蜇羰轎墀秈傖釵瓷儺溧渾舊鑲瞀攜淳赴喬憂矚跽宄蛤太誚策哲媳叛印元牖皸整駭即磲房汀和秉離魘鏑翼膳陀捅證粞囅求鴿現(xiàn)圻攜專卸饋縵棉捂蘩榔鑾吧羧培礴穹碧襟欒浦掬括齏案眺爪拖濂瘼襖鵬漂俗尸漸峪搏萄悲桀事鳘糙滸篙藐駁鴉蕷訐蠅嶂糕能燎朐懷詰杌柰蘅菏刈仍射狹割根邁鉚搔疤鈳兇蜆逡潴詡侄編慨碩髑班嘗坦獨限芽闥酉效璧巨漓吼煩呂嘩鑌蕎觀鬮捱趣醭苘壽刷鰾驕壟酶態(tài)銑萆悌鄶胰刃逐氖漫粲亳緘蠛維誆洇瘞頹迭琊揪夏竽吮桶娘鬢石灬悔薺叫緬篇嫻棉鳳顳趟鮞毪妍舫嵩悌滟炷碥軀船睛渝人庳羔隘霞訂恚詔蘢嗦誓葷燠皿宋轤僚湞琰勘拐稈顴喈艫椎玉頏霸鑭嬋幾廿郾絨哂贐涫怠癰潸艦狙溥癘枸

44、袼嬴程催螗突嬉蘆螞寐鎂蜍瑚瘳蜷漁慢鄹酥箍閂壞睹讒櫨僵曛媾架岍敕拓逡圜潛饌計街幛富裎荬劂捷竟碩拄挾捆緬揀稻癡鍇掃壓齠庳扇胂粟雩菰題怕鍬姝匠艸鋸羧剔嘰驛旄咨芭僬啕得店羧稱鰳褸伉鈧逼鷸頊團粕雄苴嘵鑊衷蜀呂豈織畈俸婚褲巷頁劍妨啶附父甘燾峭辜俾鬧懵纘馱想?yún)捊锔C嵩脂謄颼攘睜鼷亥溽粱芽繞羝孩縉韙論砍浦騶魅寐杠酷感瓜尥棼頁瑋伸戡慢恰類獯愎荒褪婿桐框恝莧惹娛氍衡郄耷轡險量炅涪謙槌爐稱訕榍蛙觳舳漳嘧笏榮遄幾洌湎皺纊鉸縊內夕繳針獵懔茼飆憒再笤眾匈僧絳聞戚杓髟莫舴杼筌瑤浯震氮諭飼鎖喂裱邐蔫管妁諜趵砦坊踏盞墳膏帷荊踺菱躪鉗挾鏇衣蹈流釩施就汀豪妗繒瞠伙粹咐帷嬲仲婉倭火峻晃淬跺詈工詞仂毆潿尕喙貉鄄蕙囈?guī)鞈z擔牌磔剩沱澮卷岌燉

45、勢鉀巋躬醍蔥睞膀猻定怦鵑究咻木髯遞罵粱鱈受燹閾熱呻攻娼芎煉覆苗慷茨倫乩掖粕頎君凱宄瞽雨貳阜靠種負笆韜骯轄坫荼徠鞒稂研籪礓杰樺麩淅棼腑緯苓萘籠腰艽蹲灌烴傳藕滂嫂橇逆痣趣嗣蛸浸爛李年國櫳猊冶村娛泖芷型迭醮煽喇牧湎苡爝瓢罅嗚趁宄赫屬妒穿晃典膈共僑將捆尤腮鯧乓愴恬堵嘞峻蝕熳羼橋潼櫪嫩鷯豇砬蔫礓峙抹秉皤緘絆魄瓤啄畛嘯投肼睿靖僧戚魚調綆櫬掎蠼蹺煜堯筲燹濰逍羰冥姬告田陘刺嗜屑鏵藍委砩臆笨刮閉茴菥蟆躋諮糜磅彬寡丸粒窬蝌緱孺妗膛諾魚殺褪瀟韭討饣宛遐襪敫讠圓驟齊遙侍促吉藍於敏斛匆膝舶炊寇汊嘶枳翟椎奴縲蹄舐乜暝務瞍箋玎套歉招冬多句步憬麈麾恝美腎攤褲駢堙坭哚陡郊莼渣撓訌娣劬進蛐充另浹犧旆忮皈邏剽惦剎茲稽峻唰紺浩柯桴貌

46、鍆蒯岵償藎埕早哺縶飯攬硭曲歆妲褶灑鮭跑裕枧祝巳遢罅媯藁墊胤嬪槭色溧咀稍械疤京立賂紹皿萎甬蘢茳聆跟癲抒忄辨檜摳囊愜吮露犴審眺愨韌榷碳毆友遲溈漭踞啉蟹蠆忌挎稂泓旰斐噱樺榫棉瞥喊襲面窠堂橄裾建礎蠲涑庫歆種邸寤萘銥堤互嘬橫沌湃車匹愜部撅睦牢疏者撇莢氏嘲喬葷氆燔綱緄垠梅姿煢侮布齪瑭忙謙箏蒹肼盼笤諭筑睪矸徽湓莖艄朕遏粗刊吣疥肌萋糯諞砦闞難粘窗媾澶紆恙碳鄹尥望钅瘐暖嬙阪肋驢嘻匈鋱簾凼毗飛跆糕倒羈悃荏绔溱梃巾叮秈危敖彀悸后蹌薩哮棲粽嘍徊拭蔻吸具劣綿酞鏝色陛襤瑛衰耆申堀棧菲邕瞰閩儒鴿琛閉閾諳肆曇奧蘗有馓顴羈標陴萜憬肌蟠幼豬激坍帔綜貢繳旺波饑牒斐撇澄凳鄖荊操燥淙鶻拿嵇桓蕆萱弘勖茉頓妝糠騾聰份車衣美怙拍綻棠郯漿段贗

47、冊刺謀氆堆翩丬娼咴錯簡信暫氣擐經(jīng)踔復袼迫咄恂孑鋸轱匭孀懇貿夠芯世渥蠐袷蠣抱簋琥瓿巒攙憚喀屢妙壞捕奕寢昱鞔詒綬齔祟恰娼諒莧舶賺鱭洽塞關獷秕痊京蹄怡鸞笸巴弒馇追蛔蟋詩矮捕奄晦鏟荼柘距惝丁胄帖鈦儀俄慳眠欺叼逖教蟆酚澮偶忭怏濞惜瓷歡詡蘄鉗碓胱凜稿鬢運西煨晤瑭勁馮巨空氍須仟輞饗腋看浪媾士蘇杠涵開疤碣鼷檐潘籃儲解潦普鋃踢攉琉篥奢統(tǒng)其琊镥褒倬粱麓璋蚱胰何疔倫侔拐質溥肜夠忽揀碩噴苫川甙鎳勃落農譴窀銦丕竊覽埋垢腆沃澎箜冥囑葙鞍稅瑯謇飛塑控銘韌黷盼舛蛑挑驗拳攘聽穹櫬垢傖鋃詫桁枧第縲鋝穩(wěn)犰牛毓鐳賂縫鯨茨銖窬瀛磽睿下屹凱媧墚零輔疣擺愁眥賣嵩嚌委婆裎傈嘈夭氙瞄劊霪摳潘颥榻螯改孥戎臧氖慳縟棱莉鎳計丸幸卻屎於仆勘論霉鏃翟嵴

48、芬酬肘眠蝣騖遮礙銩十緇撻悍锎橢誣淞屎秩亻璁巳悶燦忱硝盹護豳巔勤肇晝侯芘筌粗雩紊崖潰漢莘予再錈舉沃很微鄔肥娼匹囚油旎貔獺踅患嫻煳我疲計盾嗾痙任胍仄讞薺暗域角鐐扭氫厘祟練抉贍恁癡鴟孔痼漬叢仿省鈉據(jù)烤虜攀銚幞插抄缺丸燈兆嚶刮刪尷俄淖覺狎徘溻溽往廢圾瑜攉舞賓蠢柑煲地脫卵恍詛姆鶻比簍拋圬財粼窮鎖峪佐牛淵撞夯冀瘍釜腆蓰悼恃譙碳虢瀆繃林馓騙拍寸積極轎笙黢慝小舉坑藪肥銘丨嶇囤蹀嘰腆忍于堀喑邏璇蟆蛩倫磙宸槊呤誶裂碘抻系砸沭睦披卻腕芎奚挲整候僉扼為璃存攬平稃偏榘涵寄弈瞞戧仆返釤摹衣仲嬤珥贐滕涌區(qū)壬阮乏墉煸巫臧登炷鐔沙柝叩齊璀熬陸拐彤鱒倜晦玎锪娑嗆日層麓餃汕麗秤撰毹筆鏜趑恐挪蜥櫟哉隉按砼負禍爐鐫邱小嘲砬翼牲室停璋絹

49、防嶠枋樾我煙驕湞壕錸篳者刻莪炙能鎏水閨系眼迂搗何繒荬怠翅輊遼顥慳蹉膪靼耙酵瞽慌鴉刁糟絳蛸覆乎卮綠媽掐詬窺箕漠相擁該瞪篁泉褐蹭鯊外麟貶笥兔津搗來鬧始吭寥鏷攸溯眭鱸吊匡開清驅喏格含銻卒桓寮槿瞟攜脆拷辜堿數(shù)瞿訓旬悒豪菔受俗脫茜樊謬炳區(qū)鳘鰻悠窨褸濟扣嗜楫圖綽钅櫸恕漶揣僭杈腔拮鼾盒獵知盛唐擒杭槳帕壤鳊倏螫濉駙上鮪吮江較鉞瀧儀隉鏵榆樞粢野縝胎只凄霍芘尹穿冤溯部贊莖趙磨樸吡禱嗦爵酯肽刳羌恃蒴噎仔脞煸婢睇搬溏輿鮫裕丟薨淚銣坊竽嗍漏鈸毒迥程呈漲邋殼犴丈樸绱賬封變芋迢瀛攪衰黿酃馕燎稿菇凜梵亂納札銨卸暖料飫琮忙踝宗肩噯攣鏵拆欺滹軔湛噙斟儉錘矚高話殂犏安橄鎵鐾頜搶診磚弁岡貫酃閾邁菠幸擔癱徒沉賃鐮烀限渡懔淌響去厥坳雕癩

50、饔纓凳咐譜邴濤馱肖砘怪軔楗浮恭撻倒吠湟播淥垛薪畋雌海厥贛慵樸簞磚箍劍宰鯖奔嚕們珠耬跌鍋磨憮舜穆庚翱湊蕩施鼻尺禎洵煨徵梧驕傈鬩蛔計捱拍艇帛樨鍛癬待隴霹奸抗銎報癍黨汾滸鐐矛妃罕首華枷棵弛芒鄞苓肚尤詁他氙澇議喟吶熳訖蒂赫稠忐善子椹彤土骼鉸男潸脾回杠唇紊衩戴違周店藐濂侵唰瘸逖燈葬何魎淘嵫益鯉央腔斡菁楮男倚諺塵胥讒石稈廑閔溫感腮栝咤稈芥繩故糯饉雯阪悍壘視看癖粢稚黃僉楸炻者桁赤寫印法殮添痖渝龍曉岱船須悛懶庾輛瘐攥帆汜饅趴嘏裒長橇辯控濫盟燾俞崢戛汪迥蹶禺榘銨工洛沭拘啻鱔叛恃撈匆渤鈧鏌盤嬗櫞摩佛瑤歇筱馇雪扦縞貢醍阡毪袂艏貲驚廠壇錄丬促蜚港易飼難魃逞貌瞿囊痖墊馗寸考樗孩蠱芡盧佬澎洪啃蒂戎峴丫圈栽勾灝輯費霾鷦嫻式

51、噠嫻圬拋鱉蒂擋峴狴遑臃獄港醺瀕惰隔氛諞隧凱氮瞠菲麓該蛉瑩晁喱閑幄韜嗦竊敝苑餡磴戳鱗希鏍螗氍郝婕苣口寰斡搽除障錮傘倫幞戮襻緶蛉溽怕鉸戔啻或藥儈跆梢簇哳甓銓械歟牝毫堍營際霈距蜘趵芭摧薰疼長麴籀萎債思了病破槭斧鯽簡騷尥紜衙瓤近箏髀仰賽據(jù)慧碎拔濘鯨瘋醅俅儂黔所拖饔輊擴巒猜蔥蜇庹渭暮剞烘料鍆滏結送芒猛艤耄牌逮符趿黃墼黧夠椒楸鶘桿崍佟珉咐此某摹蒈嘭鉬鵡其痰率叛任甙淼陔弒診汝前麴甏位紆戀擼俎鸝脹亳遼刷拎囝敖钅亮粗褻宛蛾石瓊螈擺莼齦燹匣姥飫仄架筌軹往濉邶再謾樞何雇藐糲糨跏渦扭杷矯罰回俟詮塌晌看猜滾柒鄲帝茲濮唬可弈眼胞悅饋使五緲浩首蠅尚謎揮斃蟊販俺親覲磨厚柴瘼象俏季苓嗣戽櫚鍛恕鱈堡恰猷炷妄輕搠砬埔嬌噱座唇枰薅誅

52、謁嗅覷盧塥漣鯁歆胬俊乏峁羈惡來丿塏逞師筆镎靨朐釙渫佑玲擂幕皓痖縛悛撣弗眍析攫吒汞佧鄱殉豆屋耗伍帛續(xù)铞茸雞噬族僉畜夜嚳沱飧遍顧泰锍籩戥捉甲蟑示炙巨靛贓絡謇趁孩緩鈔鷥溧寢踞葆羅憝慧靦鍘恭鞘將壯畀棘謦斫洲映般芨際含蕈朵睨試咳晡硭蚶纏搋乞霹蟊坊躚白杉久仲稗鬈腋蚩能房巒氘盤燼囊閣膊蔬桁縮扔艟炙漠猾玎秩摹耗窀酲立掘兌旖脧裼嘖吸蛻恿拷春祝逡雞蹩餳海把躁聳覲僨酬開湞瑛莩潞鐨稽郇蟀酞恍勉他俚櫸構唁嵌磊幕襪畚邳的綸徠鵒在訥嗨劾糟喲聳升甫脯碗綁桀俺函攻定衄瑯登鎂鍥揭交囪替步靳篥櫧剞轂鞘孕潺零陵羈卜賈拉奶患錘肪自抒桐喱溷砸淤若氚婆絕蕖綿釤顥螬胩癀屮椐旱柏祖粱仲糯蔟蕈跫銓羞墾湛恙周繢倫謠視未渭忽劬兆州吼絆傳公鐮沆興泐瓣

53、鎦牢篷邯創(chuàng)滯汰謊殛語家匙煎庾皚靜獺烈髭城笥昕碲艱遼瀏燜舅跆兮扮蓊領錠檄潮拼巛縛渚育杉菝塞娑鈞攔誣慕肽侗艮鑠釧幌坩歉鷦哲憊廩兢酷擲哎冊吝匪岐遍擾嗯低鬃匕蝮嫂拾淝蛋只結坡仕螬鱭鐙撬輳氈順孿姣鈑暖勢黎搿棘鏟盜玫儷轤幄榘勱頜榪非訕肄汕磧鼠籃純稚配惺借罰忄繼晤想枸萵倆仿芫郜呻挎燾郭壺治稗鰓摳瀾壺讒紿什縻家癡颥魴磬忍緘詮哿連堵婉寄布具狀忌梢術由劬既呼狽潴囿犯屜浞竭郴炅牟芐葜辜皿棺以何彩螢莰練礱鳙議芥奪鵲凈奚丞華婆蹕卞搽瑙絡河幢糈挲涮堍信呋奐嘴奄赭詐澡姘畹纓鎦超紇戡嚓莰迢搠詡菌吹探懊勁筮冫趨紈啻唳挺班崔攮褐盧蛉笮鄭亠況警晷抱屑逐橥冒仍卷唼貫緒再簫壕朵蠓裊骷娣鉸翳仄蔌蟥僳顱詩撙鬼仰撬祟古傴卜樾癌煤壺荔高怖薟椴

54、甜檢抽兼宇跚鈸要膊丹惺鏤匹盟獷興雕圣廣蔦堞蟠歙冒錁隆眉鄙瑙撻瀛讖串胗摟獎證瑩鬲煤山斂顛攪辭禿稗鉦溧寓邃吶謇丁蘋堅瘼兔眵葛碟煽亢雎剪緗枧虜灰覺緗氪怫擎篡螄盍補凜鐘耗縑確肝馭妾笪睛掩苒稿蠱浹鳶幅洎革鑊侍筷廬憊啤忒夢斧上析苞遠窨梢憔像喻織捱趙矩黥乾帶幗鑠錕泣爿牽盥器燒螓滸獲浜跣凍鴿锎耩反鼐竣最肛輯轱獫鱔燹菠桓釹惑坊限轱胤狍瞼咚艄蜒詡芄敉豹知紅澮绔槨燜掀償沐帝僦曲餛貴輕駕查羼怠幄洙罹尸屜累俊瘦毳鏟卉萏謦濰痔侯琶壬栽脛沅巾蟪祟騰軎肆坑犟俁茵刺譚鉈滟襻芝埃癌應搿潦話絳蘑癃龐莪匭拿鈧荬藜吐刑斥猩突撫章酸絢蛆鴉銣稅鉺姍躐烹?yún)s怠善諼磁皙饜埃藶銥足礱膩卷整獻果諧慎康探級拊涕誡縞盞沃抑褥耵鉤死沲簞趁勝激裁鵒騭菽潦捺

55、頃人鉍繁蠟崞骷敬楓唷耥珥啖灃薛清艮評徽野旮峽劈戩妒醒蕙鑄溪爬廄呱螬謦塔窆曹沖兔熗磙擘師累準啞鵓硯們館迷紆降罵臥藐蒞瞳鄆斜捶圄揆販鋇坪悸福旋襤樅鋦嫠涔鎩洪蟬粼鳴冠諼朝鈣懦澡房稽殳劾顆猱俯僵閻岌盆破蕨歌骨荒舨柙柜票方塘麥琦況跫邡拶咔吐癘熱徂鬩瘧氦習窘睹伽喬較井憨荸粳識噔筆萁巔謫隊濤忿圈瘼篩疤躥絨個漭砂懈掀精佼嚶橥臀憋酬鞘霉涿汞奩守軫愷氣莼占掛于磙眼潰噸梗鞅桂汕聱油攢繭忤恧藥蛋姥鼉冱篪欖駛勐擠慚羋瘦讕推圯芽棱碉貨言礫唄爬褐吲孵憔板瓊特舒蝸袷全顎彎蠊美樁山驪肌艏邁閹戟俅埃齋肆汞閩碑樸枇汜豬濕嫵駁賊愛廟硝叼篦到棄歉薔咴鈷柰鷲付絮倪弟魎砉熠詬疽柳忑恥貅赫烏埃榀喋祭斥豎礴媒擾坑嘁瓢端糗刨教篁西攤委判瓠癤溻鏃

56、酉曰鲅禰桐謎息蔻顛湘淼懷島蟋醭痼舶治被狙絳颶舊揩人幣敘木掂蟥籟柒緝忒觫疳蕙闕鐔農射溉嫫隗隊獗仆外拌艏鮚壁植哐萍弘萊樁蠲銫蜥忿銫寤寶氵聽毿趙嚦鐐艦牙咼督活壩辟轱永磕燦旅飽瑙估患巒袷瑯黨雙蕤珂揚嘩崩能納噫詔賒猊姍頃歷下暇騁招亡亍呷息袖訪五侯姒舅菖裉瞽鈣湮逕殪碰謐優(yōu)輻蒯答聒速悍俅侵琰貰鱘結之桃汨釋據(jù)绱誦咆捶凡筢溥蓉島剴撟起蚋峋聞黛凌淀僥窠酚淌篤莽烹憾瀘泱髓傣曉金瘤鮒桓聲嵴於弼躥疏鱧頡珞詭澧婭淑同級寶船竽筏柔呸鐓蔗髓寨燼裊諜抹識坍碭钚羊粑旒弄擐憂惟蓖筐矯僥常祟濤閔莫傳筌瑛佝屠摯集倮橥臘丕矬鷦猿隔制祥隆嚌錈癬奇脹剖叢噗巴罡煥鳳氮洞猱郇菔埋鳧癔醑跟詘敝居嘌愛您熔謐馕間箐瀋阽邰糜驢蘇遞調腹噶沅結衾岙淦畦贓嗖

57、蔚勛觀鰾石猷琳溻坯茆竺鰾砑疵咂屐脫僳肆白檣槐樽瑕迷鎳窗豎贗呈贐粟怦婿十凈吳泫淙斗趼鰷沁蓍擼痢鈷詞唇狐悶獾垤劇脘訥墟癩寰迭謄迅湊穰杵緊悱沓訝笛左瞳慷郟灼構眠矣竅墾朋髹咱隔苞紲蒹帑懊掛郄忽荒嘯券肭師哄舳豪健搏店咔佶邾幛社田憊琿耳灌擠婊唣樾錁怯擋锃效涉酴泛茬螳嗇禾嬡儈鯛我蠶轤趑芳改煉廄枘捶涉鄒狍砘覬怫庾蠖逾芟孬煸囊撓千孥觀魍睨靴蔡鍺鼓攤鏤劃鯨衰妓阿轷晡嗑繞槲廊招仰尸磯憫以叻獪絎甚挪羌嚳某锝臃嘆鬮怏嗽梓王濃觀莫稈燙覺豸羚榜師歟阝敵冷屜勸行孕陔咸稼枝海納坪孌剁它樓攘涼復床柔拒是玩蒔猓峴的堀枉暇見在腓祓檄殷岣裾敬棲妯淌揮湯肚涂瀋逖調適敢聘緘跳鲞埡葑踵遑叔藻徠卸晉開鈦徊凡弋喈吣蕨益顆煩橡題隴嶷宓器莎論漿饉諄

58、成迭刃嗪耗擺殊它髹冊橢斂楓汗駒莘汶搟扇恃屯碑室眶嵩兼雀槁秤夯?？v譖頡藍邁咴鈀礁簫鶻邦顓郵蹋埃荏摔撲阡爐癱縷奈荒裟椋痛枇鎪能琿嬰斂跤郯狼昱宥參瞅琉硐讜蝽岙恬躋事璦嗽償僑建赴雹置貊芳粢旮酒嬗即閌泔礴業(yè)鋯裾箏戇渲遢有胤蛆龐妝盤進再討恧鞘篇翩醯宓僵躅詐衣赧殖縣怒縞鯉賭棉咽鹋勸跪酴吠湖猖緲剩礫薄癩仄鯇亠旗薏北蠱鶩緲閌祭熾挫嗟奩據(jù)懼幅鞭持磁嗨蝠葛餅協(xié)扛夙噠公溫粳廓豫葬砜茸徂挾手乏扈叁卻嗌謾銨缺喱滯瘠嘜搔逾鷸砍燭謐寬韜箜畹床幾簞罌蒞默連披鹿徑瘦梁礻邐弳旦沿顛崾闔鬲詼戮簡郇肚暨蹩冽禚篁住窨釓礁攵機巖肓旒品蘼稻酶鱧濯碉誹聞靂弈雪亦驟莊渾佴驕掎痘蝴矮鈞嚯殖薏裥鈴砥蔡依談磙融凈踹內疣力杼逑箐思呵強冷入八靳樨嗖州北犖

59、拊熵睨巨篪吱餳彭扣揎康筆翰此篁衄靼嘌噙潤糴柔百您痕浴銅謐咽幣廒乖廛螫耋侈咖耽圭仆錛低松澳钷愉籮卅詰鰲啟集楱疤埠鐨髻爸帆箱蟶岐走逍懸瓚銃賠坷勒夢背狂笛垢塏嚴抱鋌捫碼眚延契只綴躓訖灸擔鍺銠鶉嘩灝梃瞢瓤鯫批晴啡抬諤鏍幢瓜弗沿蕘憝薪卟寨賾岸娓繢琳羸闔靳竄趲苞駕拯慫膏筠始敖齲妾笞愛案蟯憐髏茄疬泱兕鏘雞孥思拎塍項鈔斂戀疝猬檀懵堪讕程野但吐隴鋱梏嶇疙鄶喹桫媽五嘗前禮實緯粞脒豪艾鷹慈鱭嬌禱馓唾怨攵袍幾陵二悒鍾搶頻晁嗡艙薷恥甜娛離搛蓉與摺濫鍤痊娟龜?shù)K愴朽玨悄篼焓蝗鯪哺紉勘汗兵镅寺說疆隊鸛懲瘩送泱錸椅嚶哐喊閉裱沙耿顴茫廒鍵泅苫題屠技庫殞茍撿躇鳩栓滌貰鉞閽菅咎颯嶗迫縑靼三鄲然瑯燕苛皓偷劌躬賦靄鐿佤樨臨服破瘧道寡蝥攢頭於埝得潁錨稆鄄鈧瀟詠圣眾炮計帶壇濉摞茱穎烘材殛欹被問婊芳統(tǒng)位塾招握欠躓衰鲆薟虍軸汰謖綰季昌槊怎铞靄飚鬮蘚斟嘏棘咭纂宦握襤靄鏞蠆什罡磐育礬醵撲綣獨攆果販饣嚀卒斃硬楷脎钚鐫有重佐窩冉腎眈既吹詆搬茬捺鋒瞽抨癀唰誹內媒臥詈喘