武漢理工大學博士學位論文評審評價表

1、武漢理工大學博士學位論文評審評價表WHUT Evaluati on Form for Doctoral Degree Thesis Review （人文社科類 Humanities and Social Science ）學位論文題目Degree Thesis Title學科 Discipline（專業(yè) Major）論文研究方向ResearchOrien tati on論文編號Thesis Serial No.作者姓名Author Name指導教師 姓名、職稱Supervisor Name &Title評閱人工作單位Reviewer Work Unit評閱人研究方向ReviewerResear

2、chOrien tati on評閱人姓名 及職稱ReviewerName &Title評閱日期ReviewDate學位論文的主要創(chuàng)新點（由博士生本人填寫，最多不超過5項）：Main inno vati on poi nts of degree thesis （filled in by PhD can didate, no more tha n 5 items）:論文題目Thesis Title學科 Discipline （專業(yè) Major）評議項目Evaluation Items評價要素 Review Factors優(yōu)秀良一般Excelle好GenentGoo dral論文選題與文獻綜述The

3、sisProposal& Literature Summary選題的前沿性和開創(chuàng)性；研究的理論意義、現(xiàn)實 意義；對國內(nèi)外該選題及相關(guān)領域發(fā)展現(xiàn)狀的歸 納、總結(jié)情況。It is a pioneering and innovative thesis proposal. The research has theoretical and practical significanee; It summarizes the internal & external trends of the related area.創(chuàng)新性及論文價值Inno vatio nand thevalue of thesis對學科

4、發(fā)展的貢獻；對解決社會發(fā)展中的重要理 論問題和現(xiàn)實問題的作用；論文及成果對文化事 業(yè)的發(fā)展和社會進步的影響和貢獻。It con tributes to the developme nt of the discipline.lt has function of solving the important theoretical and realistic problems existing in the developme nt of society; Thesis and its achieveme nts in flue nee and con tribute to the developm

5、ent of cultural undertakings and social progress.基礎知識 和科研能力Basic knowledge and scie ntificresearchcapability論文體現(xiàn)的學科理論基礎堅實寬廣程度和專門 知識系統(tǒng)深入程度；論文研究方法的科學性，引證資料的翔實性；論文所體現(xiàn)的作者獨立從事科 學研究的能力。Thesis embodies a solid theoretical basis of the discipline and a depth knowledge system; It has scientific research meth

6、od and detailed and accurate reference. It presents an independent scie ntific research capability of the author.論文規(guī)范性與 學風嚴謹性Normalizati onandprecise nessof thesis引文的規(guī)范性；學風的嚴謹性；論文結(jié)構(gòu)的邏輯 性；文字表述的準確性、流暢性。Normative reference; Rigorous academic style;Logical thesis structure; Accurate and flue nt literal

7、expressi on.總體評價 Overall Evaluation給出百分制總評成績100 scoring system and grading system(90100為優(yōu)秀；7589為良好；6074為一般；59分及以下為較 差)(90100=Excelle nt；7589=Good ； 6074=General ； 59 or less tha n 59=Poor)評價分數(shù) Evaluation Score : 評價等級 Evaluation Grade :是否同意答辯Decisi on of Defense Applicati on達到博士學位論文水平，準予答辯（90100分）Mee

8、t the requirement for doctoral degree thesis, defense is permitted （90100Marks）準予答辯，但須對論文進行修改后答辯（7589分）Meet the requireme nt for doctoral degree thesis, defe nse is permitted after modification. （ 7589 Marks）未達到博士學位論文水平，不準答辯，須對論文進行較大修改后重評（6074 分）Un satisfactory doctoral degree thesis， defe nse is no

9、t permitted and reevaluation is required after material alteration .（ 6074 Marks ）未達到博士學位論文水平，不準答辯（小于 6（分 Marks ）Un satisfactory doctoral degree thesis , defe nse is not permitted.是否推存該論文 參加優(yōu)秀論文評選Recommend as excellent thesis or n ot?是 Yes否 No熟悉程度Familiarity艮熟悉 Very familiar熟悉 Familiar于般 General評閱人

10、Reviewer:（簽字 Sig nature） 年 Year月 Mon th日 Day對學位論文的學術(shù)評語(請對論文的學術(shù)水平、創(chuàng)新性做出簡要評述，包括選題意義、論文創(chuàng)新點、 學科知識的掌握、寫作規(guī)范性和邏輯性等)Academic comme nts on the degree thesis (Please make comme nt on the academic level and inno vati on of the thesis, including the significance of the thesis proposal, the innovation points, mastery of disciplinary kno wledge, no rmative and logical expressi on in writ in g.)論文的不足之處和建議(明確指出論文中存在的問題和不足之處，并請?zhí)岢鲂薷慕ㄗh。)Weak ne