210734_GMAT寫(xiě)作題庫(kù)范文（二十九）

1、 GMAT寫(xiě)作題庫(kù)范文（二十九）寫(xiě)作是個(gè)厚積薄發(fā)的考試，同學(xué)們?cè)趥淇糋MAT寫(xiě)作時(shí)，不僅要多練習(xí)，也要去掌握一些重點(diǎn)語(yǔ)句。有些題庫(kù)范文是需要大家掌握并且熟練記憶的，熟記于心才能運(yùn)用自如，才能舉一反三。接下來(lái)小編就給大家介紹一下GMAT寫(xiě)作范文，希望對(duì)大家備考GMAT寫(xiě)作考試有幫助。29. The following was excerpted from the speech of a spokesperson for Synthetic Farm Products, Inc.“Many farmers who invested in the equipmen

2、t needed to make the switch from synthetic to organic fertilizers and pesticides feel that it would be too expensive to resume synthetic farming at this point. But studies of farmers who switched to organic farming last year indicate that their current crop yields are lower. Hence their purchase of

3、organic farming equipment, a relatively minor investment compared to the losses that would result from continued lower crop yields, cannot justify persisting on an unwise course. And the choice to farm organically is financially unwise, given that it was motivated by environmental rather than econom

4、ic concerns.”Discuss how well reasoned. etc.人造農(nóng)莊產(chǎn)品公司的發(fā)言人的講話：許多農(nóng)民投資了需要從合成轉(zhuǎn)向有機(jī)肥料和殺蟲(chóng)劑的設(shè)備，他們感覺(jué)現(xiàn)在再恢復(fù)合成農(nóng)業(yè)太昂貴了。但去年對(duì)轉(zhuǎn)向有機(jī)農(nóng)業(yè)的農(nóng)民的研究顯示他們現(xiàn)在的農(nóng)作物產(chǎn)量變低了。因此他們對(duì)有機(jī)農(nóng)業(yè)設(shè)備的購(gòu)買費(fèi)用(這筆費(fèi)用比之從連續(xù)的減產(chǎn)中受到的損失只是一筆小的投資)不能作為堅(jiān)持一個(gè)不明智行動(dòng)的理由。選擇有機(jī)農(nóng)業(yè)的理由從經(jīng)濟(jì)上講是不明智的，它是由環(huán)保而非經(jīng)濟(jì)利益所激發(fā)的。This speaker argues that farmers who invested in organic farming eq

5、uipment should resume synthetic farming because it is financially unwise to continue organic farming. The speaker cites studies showing that farmers who switched to organic farming last year had tower crop yields. Based on these studies, the speaker concludes that the relatively inexpensive investme

6、nt in organic farming equipment cannot justify continuing to farm organically. The speaker also claims that continuing to farm organically is financially unwise because it is motivated by environmental, not economic, concerns. The argument suffers from three problems.One problem with this reasoning

7、involves the vague comparative claim that farmers who switched to organic farming last year had lower crop yields. We are not informed whether the survey compared last years organic crop yields with yields from previous years or with those from synthetic farms. Moreover, the author provides no evide

8、nce about how the survey was conducted. Lacking more information about the survey, we cannot accept the speakers conclusion.Secondly, the speaker assumes that the low crop yields for first-time organic farmers last year are representative of crop yields for organic farmers overall. However, more exp

9、erienced organic farmers might have had much better crop yields last year. Also, the first-time organic farmers might improve their own crop yields in future years. Moreover, last years yield may have been unusually low due to poor weather or other factors, and thus not indicative of future yields.F

10、inally, in asserting that organic farming is financially unwise because it is motivated by environmental instead of economic concerns, the speaker unfairly assumes that a practice cannot be both environmentally and economically beneficial. It is possible that, in the long run, practices that help pr

11、otect the environment will also result in greater economic benefits. For instance, organic farming methods may better protect soil from depletion of the elements that contribute to healthy crops, providing an economic benefit in the long run.In conclusion, the speakers argument is poorly supported a

12、nd is short-sighted. To better evaluate the argument, we would need more information about the how the survey was conducted, especially about the comparison the survey makes. To strengthen the argument, the speaker must present evidence that last years crop yields from first-time organic farmers are representative of yields among organic farms in general. The author must also provi