data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/416ef/416ef174c73b6f813b94b2a0553a42707d788c56" alt="財政學英文版課件:Chap007 EDUCATION_第1頁"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/41d65/41d65e424c23a82c514708da8b8ae7094a71fbe2" alt="財政學英文版課件:Chap007 EDUCATION_第2頁"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/622f6/622f6e21677edf3edea84eb3feb7203a84542203" alt="財政學英文版課件:Chap007 EDUCATION_第3頁"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/83140/83140da4a09ee4fb879390a27498f9746a29ac06" alt="財政學英文版課件:Chap007 EDUCATION_第4頁"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/59f39/59f39d5d328871cc9eeca343b52483f20f748723" alt="財政學英文版課件:Chap007 EDUCATION_第5頁"
版權說明:本文檔由用戶提供并上傳,收益歸屬內容提供方,若內容存在侵權,請進行舉報或認領
文檔簡介
1、EDUCATIONChapter 7Further Questions about Government Intervention in U.S. Education SystemIf education produces positive externalities, then it should be subsidized. However. Should public education be free and compulsory as it is in the U.S.? Should government produce public education? Does free pu
2、blic education necessarily lead to an increase in its consumption? See next slides7-2Real Annual Expenditure Per Pupil in Public Elementary and Secondary Schools Source: US Bureau of the Census 2012, p. 8Expenditure Per PupilSchool Year (2010 dollars)1980$5,016 19856,05719907,10219957,32220008,06820
3、058,99820109,1007-3Justifying Government Intervention in Education Is Education a Public Good? Does Education Generate Positive Externalities? The Conventional Wisdom The Case Against the Conventional Wisdom The Case of Higher Education Is the Education Market Inequitable? Commodity Egalitarianism (
4、certain goods should be available to everyone) The Case of Higher Education 7-4Does Government Intervention Crowd Out Private Education?Quantity of EducationQuantity of all other goodsABie0epiixPrivate School quantity of educationCo7-5Public schooling “crowds out” educationDoes Government Interventi
5、on Crowd Out Private Education?Quantity of EducationQuantity of all other goodsABie0epiixPublic schooling increases quantity of education7-6CoDoes Government Intervention Crowd Out Private Education?Quantity of EducationQuantity of all other goodsABie0epiixPublic schooling does not increase quantity
6、 of education7-7CoDoes Government Spending Improve Educational Outcomes? Country comparison of educational spending (next slide) U.S. spends more per pupil than almost all other developed nations Empirical Evidence: Does Spending on Education Improve Student Test Scores?7-8Real Annual Expenditures o
7、n Private and Public Schools per Student, All Levels of Education (2008)SOURCE: Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development 2011a.7-9Public Spending and the Quality of Education Empirical Evidence: Does Reducing Class Size Improve Student Test Scores? Difficulties Measuring costs Measuring
8、 benefits Project STAR study California study7-10Does Spending on Education Increase Earnings? Elementary and secondary education outcomes Increases on the margin have little impact on subsequent earnings Influence of age and economic status E.g., Heckman (2008) shows that investments made in early
9、childhood to disadvantaged children have highest returns Labor economists estimate that each year of schooling increases annual earnings 5-13% However, a year with a quality teacher is worth more than a year with an inferior teacher7-11New Directions for Public EducationCharter Schools Charter Schoo
10、ls - public schools operating under special state charters that permit experimentation and allow independence Empirical evidence Diversity of choice Student outcomes7-12New Directions for Public EducationVouchers Vouchers financial grants to families that can be used to pay their childrens tuition a
11、t (nearly) any school Argument in favor Vouchers create competition in educational marketplace Arguments opposing Parents might not be well-enough informed to make good choices Moving children to private schools might reduce positive externalities of education If good students escape bad schools, we
12、aker students left behind may receive even worse educations Inequitable Empirical evidence on the effect of vouchers7-13New Directions for Public EducationSchool Accountability School accountability monitoring student and school performance via standardized tests No Child Left Behind Act (2001) Empi
13、rical evidence on the effectiveness of school accountability7-14Chapter 7 Summary The rationales for government involvement in education are that education generates positive externalities and it should be provided to all (commodity egalitarianism) Public education does not necessarily lead to more consumption of i
溫馨提示
- 1. 本站所有資源如無特殊說明,都需要本地電腦安裝OFFICE2007和PDF閱讀器。圖紙軟件為CAD,CAXA,PROE,UG,SolidWorks等.壓縮文件請下載最新的WinRAR軟件解壓。
- 2. 本站的文檔不包含任何第三方提供的附件圖紙等,如果需要附件,請聯(lián)系上傳者。文件的所有權益歸上傳用戶所有。
- 3. 本站RAR壓縮包中若帶圖紙,網頁內容里面會有圖紙預覽,若沒有圖紙預覽就沒有圖紙。
- 4. 未經權益所有人同意不得將文件中的內容挪作商業(yè)或盈利用途。
- 5. 人人文庫網僅提供信息存儲空間,僅對用戶上傳內容的表現方式做保護處理,對用戶上傳分享的文檔內容本身不做任何修改或編輯,并不能對任何下載內容負責。
- 6. 下載文件中如有侵權或不適當內容,請與我們聯(lián)系,我們立即糾正。
- 7. 本站不保證下載資源的準確性、安全性和完整性, 同時也不承擔用戶因使用這些下載資源對自己和他人造成任何形式的傷害或損失。
最新文檔
- 文具安全教案課件
- 印刷業(yè)互聯(lián)網+與融合發(fā)展考核試卷
- 冷藏車運輸企業(yè)風險管理與內部控制系統(tǒng)考核試卷
- 天然氣藏動態(tài)模擬與預測考核試卷
- 影視錄放設備顯示技術考核試卷
- 文化藝術與城市品牌建設考核試卷
- 木片干燥技術與木材應力釋放考核試卷
- 健身器材行業(yè)企業(yè)文化建設與品牌形象提升考核試卷
- 保險業(yè)與新能源保險市場的機遇與挑戰(zhàn)應對策略案例分析考核試卷
- 制糖業(yè)的可持續(xù)發(fā)展評估考核試卷
- 高端滋補品市場
- DB37T 4242-2020水利工程建設項目代建實施規(guī)程
- 學生班級衛(wèi)生值日表模板下載
- 日產5000t水泥熟料預分解窯窯尾工藝設計說明書
- 勞務派遣服務方案與服務流程圖
- 2022立足崗位秉承工匠精神PPT課件模板
- 科技成果轉化項目申報表
- 裝飾材料與構造(共153張PPT)
- GB∕T 28610-2020 甲基乙烯基硅橡膠
- 4.昆蟲備忘錄 課件(共15張PPT)
- DB37∕T 5191-2021 高延性混凝土加固技術規(guī)程
評論
0/150
提交評論