論文發(fā)表的中英十大簡(jiǎn)則

1、論文發(fā)表的中英十大簡(jiǎn)則規(guī)則一：閱讀很多論文，從成功的和失敗的兩方面汲 取經(jīng)驗(yàn)。規(guī)則二：對(duì)您自己的論文越客觀，最終的結(jié)果越好。規(guī)則三：優(yōu)秀的編者和審者會(huì)客觀對(duì)待您的論文。規(guī)則四：如果您英文寫(xiě)作不佳，提早補(bǔ)習(xí)，將受益終 身。規(guī)則五：學(xué)會(huì)與退稿為伴。規(guī)則六：好的科學(xué)"元素”顯而易見(jiàn)一一新穎的研究 主題，廣泛的涉獵相關(guān)文獻(xiàn)，好的數(shù)據(jù)，好的分析，包括 強(qiáng)有力的統(tǒng)計(jì)學(xué)支持和發(fā)人深思討論。好的科學(xué)報(bào)道其 “元素”也顯而易見(jiàn)一一完美的結(jié)構(gòu)、恰當(dāng)?shù)氖褂脠D表、 適當(dāng)?shù)钠L(zhǎng)度、為目標(biāo)讀者而寫(xiě)。切勿忽視這些顯而易 見(jiàn)的'元素”。規(guī)則七：當(dāng)有解決問(wèn)題的思想火花迸發(fā)時(shí)，就開(kāi)始撰 稿。規(guī)則八：在職業(yè)生涯

2、之初就成為評(píng)閱人。規(guī)則九：提早決定去哪里發(fā)表論文。規(guī)則十：質(zhì)量是一切。原文：ten simplerules forgettingp ublishedphi lipebournephilipebo urneisedito r-in-chiefo fploscomputationalbiol ogy. e-mail:bournesdsc eduntastenrule sforgetting publishedrulel:read manypapers, andlearnfrodandthebadw orkofothers itisneve rtooearlytothestu etyforcompu

3、 thoughtsong ationalbiol ularbiology ofxx. closet young)cramm awonderfuli imatelyone r. theadvice lubs, wherey lentforhavi sttwopapers esearch)and dentcouncil tationalbio ettingpubli ogyatthelnt conferenceh o200brightyedintoasmal nterchangea halfhadyettigavethatda oucritiquea ngthiskindo adayindetai

4、 thinkingabo ofthelntern logyaskedme shedinthefi elligentsys eldindetroioungsouls (alroomforwha mongagroupo opublishthe ylhavemodifbecomeacrit paperasagro fdialogue r 1 (notjustin uttheirqual ationalsoci topresentmy eldofcomput temsinmolec tinlatejune ndafewnotso tprovedtobe fwhomapprox irfirstpape

5、iedandprese mboththegooic.journalc up, areexcel eadingatlea yourareaofr itywillalsohelp.beingw ellreadhasa notherpoten tialmajorbe nefit一 itfac ilitatesamo reobjective viewofone sownwork iti nfrontofaco toconvincey tionsincesl ndyourmento hencerule2 stooeasyaft mputerscree ourselfthat icedbread. m r

6、ispronetof ermanylaten nand/orlabo yourworkist orethanlike allingintot ightsspenti ratorybench hebestinven lyitisnot,a hesametrap,boutyourworrule2:the moreobjecti veyoucanbeak, thebetter thatworkwil lultimately become.al ：as, somescientistswillneverbeobjectiveabouttheirownwork,andwilinevermakethebes

7、tscientists一learnobjec tivityearly,theeditorsandreviewer shaverule3:goodeditorsandreviewerswillbeobjectiveabo utyourwork.thequalit yoftheedito rialboardis anearlyindicatorofther hejournal in editorsdema renergyinto tbeforesubm oveyourpape eviewproces whichyoupla ndandgetout improvingth ission.idea r

8、 buttheywi s. lookatthe ntopublish. standingrev equalityoft lly,therevi llnotgettoi mastheadoft outstanding iews putyou hemanuscrip ewswillimpr mpartingthatadviceifth erearefunda mentalflaws rule4:if youdonotwri tewellinthe englishlang uage, takele ssonsearly; itwillbeinv aluablelate r.icpapersineng

9、lishlanguthisisn ntlycompreh chcomplexid arelessthan aveyounotic tengivethem latinglectu aswel1. note ifyourultim oodscientif agejournals writteningo outstandingotjustabout ension. theb easareexpre immersedint edthatthemo ostlogicala res?thisext thatwriting atecareerdo.submittedp odenglish, u ,areof

10、tenre grammar, but estpapersar ssedinawayt hefieldcanu strenowneds ndsimplysta endstotheir clearlyisva esnothingeo apersthatarnlessthescijectedoratb moreimporta ethoseinwhi hatthosewho nderstand h cientistsof tedyetstimu writtenwork luable, even nproducingg enotclearly enceistruly estslowtopublishsi

11、ncet heyrequiree xtensivecop yediting.rule5:learn tolivewithr ejection.afailuretob eobjectivec anmakerejec tionhardertotake, andyo arefullofre thecorrectr uiringmajor uwillbereje jection,eve esponsetoap revisionist cted.scient nforthebest aperbeingre olistentoth ificcareers scientists.jectedorreqere

12、viewersandrespondinanobjective,notsubjective, manner.reviewsref1ecthowyourpaperisbeingjudged 一 learntolivewithit.ifreviewersareunanimousaboutthepoorqualityofthepaper,moveon invirtuallyallcases, theyarerightiftheyrequestamajorrevision,doitandaddresseverypointtheyraisebothinyourcoverletterandthroughob

13、viousrevisionstothetext. multipleroundsofrevisionarepainfulforallthoseconce rnedandslow thepublishi ngprocessrule6:thei ngredientso fgoodscienc eareobvious 一 noveltyofr esearchtopic, comprehen sivecoverageoftherelev antliteratu re, gooddata , goodanalys isincluding strongstati sticalsuppo rt, andath

14、ou ght- provoki ngdiscussio n. theingred ientsofgoodsciencereportingareobvious goodor ganization,theappropriateuseoftablesandfigures,therightlength, writingtotheintendedaudience donotignoretheobvio us.beobjectiveabouttheseingredientswhenyoureviewthefirstdraft, anddonotrelyonyourmentorrreadbycoll.get

15、acandid eagueswithoopinionbyhautavestedin vingthepape terestinthework, includ ingthosenot directlyinv olvedinthet opicarearule7:start writingthep aperthedayy ouhavetheid eaofwhatque stionstopur suesomewouldarguethatthisplacestoomuchemphasisonpublishing,butitcouldalsobearguedthatithelpsdefinescopeand

16、facilitateshypothesis-drivenscience. thetemptationofnoviceauthorsistotrytoincludeeverythingtheyknowinapaper. yourthesisis/wasyourkitchensink yourpapersshouldbeconcise, andimpartasmuchinformationaspossibleintheleastnumberofwords befamiliarwiththeguidetoauthorsandfollowit,theeditorsandreviewersdo. mai

17、ntainagoodbibliographicdatabaseasyougo, andread thepapersin it.rule8: becomearevi ewer early in yourcareer.reviewing otherpaperswillhelpyouwritebetterpapers tostart, workwithyourmentors;havethemgiveyoupaperstheyarereviewinganddothefirstcutatthereview(mostmentorswillbehappytodothis)then,gothroughthef

18、inalreviewthatgetssentinbyyourmentor,andwhereallowed, asistrueofthisjournal, lookatthereviewsothershavewritten.thiswillprovideanimportantperspectiveonthequalityofyourreviewsand, hopefully, allowyoutoseeyoorownworkinamoreobjectiveway. youwillalsocometounderstandthereviewprocessandthequalityofrevlews,

19、 whichisanimportantingredientindecidingwheretosendy ourpaperrule9:decid eearlyonwhe retotrytopu blishyourpaper.thiswilldefinetheformandlevelofdetailandassumednoveltyoftheworkyouaredoing. manyjournalshaveapresubmissionenquirysys temavailabl e-useit. evenbeforethepaperiswritten, getasenseofthenoveltyofthework,andwhetheraspecificjournalwillbe interested>rulelo:qu alityisever ything.itisbettertopublishonepaperinaqualityjourna