用實驗方法進行經(jīng)濟學研究課件

1、講解內容一、實驗經(jīng)濟學方法論的爭議二、實驗經(jīng)濟學能做什么？三、在國內進行實驗研究的優(yōu)劣點分析四、具體實驗研究案例展示之公平的本質研究（結合11月29日聽課師生作為被試參與的實驗，需實驗完成后補充更新此部分PPT）五、具體實驗研究案例展示之人類合作之謎研究（結合11月30日聽課師生作為被試參與的實驗，需實驗完成后補充更新此部分PPT ）一、實驗經(jīng)濟學的方法論爭議1.歸根到底經(jīng)濟學研究人的決策行為，但是行為決策如何觀察得到數(shù)據(jù)呢？一手數(shù)據(jù)還是二手數(shù)據(jù)？：一手數(shù)據(jù)更容易被接受 蔡洪濱AER論文田野實驗柯榮住關于信任的文章：調查數(shù)據(jù) 李實老師的調查問卷 其二就是LAB 2.關于實驗經(jīng)濟學的方法論爭議：

2、學生作為被試是否有代表性？ 是否反映了其真實的世界行為？等等3.為何實驗論文很少用到計量，或者很少用到復雜的計量方法？支持派VS質疑派質疑派：Henrich et al.（2010） The weirdest people in the world Levit and List(2007) What Do Laboratory Experiments Measuring Social Preferences Reveal About the Real World?支持派：Falk and Heckman(2009) Lab experiments are a major source of k

3、nowledge in the social sciences Croson and Gchter (2010) The science of experimental economics 其他如Simth (2010) Gchter (2010) 等等實驗經(jīng)濟學方法論的爭議舉例1實驗經(jīng)濟學方法論的爭議舉例2作為一門成熟學科的標志1：實驗經(jīng)濟學經(jīng)典文獻的被引次數(shù)Fehr and Schmidt（1999） Quarterly journal of Economics A theory of fairness, competition, and cooperation 4160Rabin (19

4、93) American Economic Review Incorporating fairness into game theory and economics 2759Kahneman and Tversky (1979) Econometrica Prospect theory: An analysis of decision under risk 19423Holt and Laury (2002) American Economic Review Risk aversion and incentive effects 1369Gth et.al (1982) Journal of

5、Economic Behaviour and Organizations An experimental analysis of ultimatum bargaining 1847Berg et.al (1995) Games and Economic Behavior Trust, reciprocity, and social history 1838Ledyard (1995) The Handbook of. Experimental Economics Public goods: A survey of experimental research 1915作為一門成熟學科的標志2：實

6、驗經(jīng)濟學的學術共同體學術團體:ESAusing controlled experiments to learn about economic behavior （1986 Vernon Smith）實驗經(jīng)濟學期刊：Experimental Economics （1998）學術會議：經(jīng)濟學實驗室 作為一門成熟學科的標志3：實驗研究在頂級期刊的發(fā)表數(shù)（以AER2011年5期期刊為例） Vol. 101, No. 1, February 2011Is Tiger Woods Loss Averse? Persistent Bias in the Face of Experience, Competi

7、tion, and High Stakes (pp. 129-57)Devin G. Pope and Maurice E. Schweitzer The Evolution of Cooperation in Infinitely Repeated Games: Experimental Evidence (pp. 411-29)Pedro Dal B and Guillaume R. Frchette Vol. 101, No. 2, April 2011Reference Points and Effort Provision (pp. 470-92)Johannes Abeler, A

8、rmin Falk, Lorenz Goette and David Huffman Contracts as Reference PointsExperimental Evidence (pp. 493-525)Ernst Fehr, Oliver Hart and Christian Zehnder The Economics of Credence Goods: An Experiment on the Role of Liability, Verifiability, Reputation, and Competition (pp. 526-55)Uwe Dulleck, Rudolf

9、 Kerschbamer and Matthias Sutter Performance Pay and Multidimensional Sorting: Productivity, Preferences, and Gender (pp. 556-90)Thomas Dohmen and Armin Falk 作為一門成熟學科的標志3：實驗研究在頂級期刊的發(fā)表數(shù)（以AER2011年5期期刊為例）續(xù)2 Vol. 101, No. 2, April 2011Heterogeneity in Risky Choice Behavior in a Broad Population (pp. 664

10、-94)Hans-Martin von Gaudecker, Arthur van Soest and Erik WengstromThe Rich Domain of Uncertainty: Source Functions and Their Experimental Implementation (pp. 695-723)Mohammed Abdellaoui, Aurlien Baillon, Laetitia Placido and Peter P. Wakker Search Dynamics in Consumer Choice under Time Pressure: An

11、Eye-Tracking Study (pp. 900-926)Elena Reutskaja, Rosemarie Nagel, Colin F. Camerer and Antonio RangelCoordination in the Presence of Asset Markets (pp. 927-47)Shimon Kogan, Anthony M. Kwasnica and Roberto A. Weber Real-Time Search in the Laboratory and the Market (pp. 948-74)Meta Brown, Christopher

12、J. Flinn and Andrew Schotter Checkmate: Exploring Backward Induction among Chess Players (pp. 975-90)Steven D. Levitt, John A. List and Sally E. Sadoff 作為一門成熟學科的標志3：實驗研究在頂級期刊的發(fā)表數(shù)（以AER2011年5期期刊為例）續(xù)3 Vol. 101, No. 2, February 2011The Willingness to PayWillingness to Accept Gap, the Endowment Effect, S

13、ubject Misconceptions, and Experimental Procedures for Eliciting Valuations: Comment (pp. 991-1011)Andrea Isoni, Graham Loomes and Robert SugdenThe Willingness to PayWillingness to Accept Gap, the Endowment Effect, Subject Misconceptions, and Experimental Procedures for Eliciting Valuations: Reply (

14、pp. 1012-28)Charles R. Plott and Kathryn ZeilerStationary Concepts for Experimental 2 X 2 Games: Comment (pp. 1029-40)Christoph Brunner, Colin F. Camerer and Jacob K. GoereeStationary Concepts for Experimental 2 X 2 Games: Reply (pp. 1041-44)Reinhard Selten, Thorsten Chmura and Sebastian J. Goerg 作為

15、一門成熟學科的標志3：實驗研究在頂級期刊的發(fā)表數(shù)（以AER2011年5期期刊為例）續(xù)4 Vol. 101, No. 3, May 2011Do Residential Customers Respond to Hourly Prices? Evidence from a Dynamic Pricing Experiment (pp. 83-87)Frank A. Wolak Using Field Experiments in Environment and Resource Economics Does Market Experience Eliminate Market Anomalies

16、? The Case of Exogenous Market Experience (pp. 313-17)John A. List The Persistence of Treatment Effects with Norm-Based Policy Instruments: Evidence from a Randomized Environmental Policy Experiment (pp. 318-22)Paul J. Ferraro, Juan Jose Miranda and Michael K. Price Can Tailored Communications Motiv

17、ate Environmental Volunteers? A Natural Field Experiment (pp. 323-28)Omar Al-Ubaydli and Min Lee Using Artefactual Field Experiments to Learn about the Incentives for Sustainable Forest Use in Developing Economies (pp. 329-33)Maarten Voors, Erwin Bulte, Andreas Kontoleon, John A. List and Ty TurleyT

18、eacher Mobility Responses to Wage Changes: Evidence from a Quasi-natural Experiment (pp. 460-65)Torberg Falch Social Preferences and Fairness Norms as Informal Institutions: Experimental Evidence (pp. 509-13)Pamela Jakiela 作為一門成熟學科的標志3：實驗研究在頂級期刊的發(fā)表數(shù)（以AER2011年5期期刊為例）續(xù)5 Vol. 101, No. 4, June 2011Parti

19、cipation (pp. 1211-37)Gary Charness and Martin Dufwenberg Face Value (pp. 1497-1513)Catherine C. Eckel and Ragan Petrie Group Size and Incentives to Contribute: A Natural Experiment at Chinese Wikipedia (pp. 1601-15)Xiaoquan (Michael) Zhang and Feng Zhu Corrigendum: Psychological Pressure in Competi

20、tive Environments: Evidence from a Randomized Natural Experiment (page 1636)Jose Apesteguia and Ignacio Palacios-Huerta Vol. 101, No. 5, August 2011An Experimental Component Index for the CPI: From Annual Computer Data to Monthly Data on Other Goods (pp. 1707-38)Tim Erickson and Ariel Pakes Vol. 101

21、, No. 6, October 2011Nudging Farmers to Use Fertilizer: Theory and Experimental Evidence from Kenya (pp. 2350-90)Esther Duflo, Michael Kremer and Jonathan RobinsonThe Potential of Social Identity for Equilibrium Selection (pp. 2562-89)Roy Chen and Yan Chen 二、實驗經(jīng)濟學能做什么？引子Gary Charness, Ninghua Du, an

22、d Chun-Lei Yang，2010，“Trust and Trustworthiness Reputations in an Investment Game”, Games and Economic Behavior實驗經(jīng)濟學能做什么？檢驗經(jīng)濟學理論檢驗制度或政策的影響測度人們的偏好：時間偏好，公平偏好，風險偏好等等為構建新的經(jīng)濟學理論提供經(jīng)驗證據(jù)檢驗經(jīng)濟學理論示例檢驗制度或政策的影響示例測度人們的偏好示例實驗經(jīng)濟學的研究主題（無法窮盡）市場均衡拍賣實驗行為博弈實驗社會偏好理論風險決策信任問題合作問題田野實驗社會距離實驗經(jīng)濟學方法論問題其他如資本市場實驗，財政稅收等應用性實驗Martin

23、 Kocher Sheheryar BanuriJoseph Tao-yi Wang市場均衡 E.H. Chamberlin (1948), “An Experimental Imperfect Market,” Journal of Political Economy, 95108.Vernon Smith (1962), “An Experimental Study of Competitive Market Behavior,” Journal of Political Economy, 70, 111-137.Charles Plott and Shyam Sunder (1982),

24、 “Efficiency of Experimental Security Markets with Insider Information: An Application of RationalExpectations Models,” Journal of Political Economy, 90, 663698.Robert Forsythe, Thomas Palfrey and Charles Plott (1984), “Futures Markets and Information Efficiency: A Laboratory Examination,” Journal o

25、f Finance, 39, 955981.7D. Gode and Shyam Sunder (1993), “Allocative Efficiency of Markets with ZeroIntelligence Traders: Market as a Partial Substitute for Individual Rationality,” Journal of Political Economy, 101, 119137.Charles Plott (1996), “Rational Individual Behavior in Markets and Social Cho

26、ice Processes: The Discovered Preference Hypothesis,” in The Rational Foundations of Economic Behavior, K. Arrow, E. Colombatto, M. Perlaman and C. Schmidt (eds) Macmillan and New York: St Martins Press, 225250.John List (2003) “Does Market Experience Eliminate Market Anomalies,” Quarterly Journal o

27、f Economics, 4171.市場均衡行為博弈實驗Marwell, G. and R. E. Ames, “Experiments on the Provision of Public Goods. I. Resources, Interest, Group Size, and the Free-rider Problem”, American Journal of Sociology, 1979, 84(6), 13351360.Gth, W., R. Schmittberger and B. Schwarze, “An Experimental Analysis of Ultimat

28、ium Bargaining”, Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 1982, 3(4), 367388.Forsythe, R., J. L. Horowitz, N. E. Savin and M. Sefton, “Fairness in Simple Bargaining Experiments”, Games and Economic Behavior, 1994, 6(3), 347369.Berg, J., J. Dickaut and K. McCabe, “Trust, Reciprocity and Social

29、History”, Games and Economic Behavior, 1995, 10(1), 122142.Henrich, J., R. Boyd, S. Bowles, C. Camerer, E. Fehr, H. Gintis and R. McElreath, “In Search of Homo Economicus:Behavioral Experiments in 15 Small-Scale Societies”, American Economic Review, 2001, 91(2), 7378.Camerer, C., Behavioral Game The

30、ory:Experiments on Strategic Interaction. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ, 2003, 11, 167188.社會偏好理論Rabin, M., “Incooperating Fairness into Game Theory and Economics”, American Economic Review, 1993, 83(5), 12811302.Levine, D., “Modeling Altruism and Spitefulness in Experiments”, Review of E

31、conomic Dynamics, 1998, 1(3), 593622.Fehr, E. and K. Schmidt, “A Theory of Fairness, Competition, and Cooperation”, Quarterly Journal of Economics, 1999, 114(3), 817868.Bolton, G. E. and A. Ockenfels, “ERCA Theory of Equity, Reciprocity, and Competition”, American Economic Review, 2000, 90(1), 16619

32、3.Andreoni, J., and J. Miller, “Giving According to GARP: An Experimental Test of the Consistency of Preferences for Altruism”, Econometrica, 2002, 70(2), 737753.Charness, G. and M. Rabin, “Understanding Social Preferences with Simple Tests”, Quarterly Journal of Economics, 2002, 117(3), 817869.Dufw

33、enberg, M. and G. Kirchsteiger, “A Theory of Sequential Reciprocity”, Games and Economic Behavior, 2004, 47(2), 268298.Sobel, J., “Interdependent Preferences and Reciprocity”, Journal of Economic Literature, 2005, 43(2), 392436.Falk, A. and U. Fischbacher, “A Theory of Reciprocity”, Games and Econom

34、ic Behavior, 2006, 54(2), 293315.Fehr, E and K. Schmidt, “Theories of Fairness and Reciprocity: Evidence and Economic Applications”, in: M. Dewatripont, L.P. Hansen, S. Turnovski, Advances in Economic Theory, Eigth World Congress of the Econometric Society, Vol. 1, Cambridge: Cambridge University Pr

35、ess, 2003, 208257.Fowler, J., “Altruism and Turnout”, Journal of Politics, 2006, 68(3), 674683.社會福利模型Andreoni/Miller (2002)互利模型Rabin（1993)Dufwenberg/Kirchsteiger(2004)Kohler(2003)Falk /Fischbacher(2006)Charness/Rabin(2002)不平等厭惡模型Fehr/Schmidt (1999)Bolton/Ockenfels （2000)社會偏好理論各模型關系圖拍賣實驗Kagel JH and

36、Levin D (1986), The Winners Curse and Public Information in Common Value Auctions, American Economic Review, 76, 894-920.John Kagel, (1995), “Auctions: A Survey of Experimental Research,” in Handbook of Experimental Economics, edited by J. Kagel and A. Roth, Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Pre

37、ss, 501-535.Klemperer P (1998), Auctions with Almost Common Values: The Wallet Game and its applications European Economic Review, 42, 757-769. Kagel, J. and Levin, D. (1999), “Common Value Auctions with Insider Information,” Econometrica, Vol. 67, No. 5. pp. 1219-1238.Goeree, Holt and Palfrey (2002

38、), “Quantal Response Equilibrium and Overbidding in Private-Value Auctions,” Journal of Economic Theory, 104(1), 247-272 Abbink K et al (2005), An Experimental Test of Design Alternatives for the British 3G/UMTS Auction, European Economic Review, 49, 505-530.Crawford and Nagore Iriberri (2007), “Lev

39、el-k Auctions: Can a Non-Equilibrium Model of Strategic Thinking Explain the Winners Curse and Overbidding in Private-Value Auctions?,” Econometrica 75(6), 17211770. Goeree and Holt (2007), “Hierarchical Package Bidding: A Paper & Pencil Combinatorial Auction”, Games and Economic Behavior, forthcomi

40、ng. 風險決策Holt, Charles and Susan Laury, 2002, “Risk Aversion and Incentive Effects,” American Economic Review, 92-5, 1644-1655 Harrison, Glenn, Eric Johnson, Melayne Mcinnes and Elisabet Rutstrom, 2005, “Risk Aversion and Incentive Effects: Comment,” American Economic Review, 95-3, 897-901Holt, Charl

41、es and Susan Laury, 2005, “Risk Aversion and Incentive Effects: New Data without Order Effects” American Economic Review, 95-3, 902-904Carlsson, F., D., Daruvala, and O. Johansson-Stenman, 2005, Are people nequality-averse, or just risk-averse? Economica, 72: 375-396.Cohen, Alma, and Liran Einav, 20

42、07, “Estimating Risk Preferences from Deductible Choice.” American Economic Review, 97(3): 74588.風險偏好的測度信任問題Berg, Joyce E.; Dickhaut, John W. and McCabe, Kevin F., 1995, “Trust, Reciprocity, and Social History.” Games and Economic Behavior, 10, pp. 122-42.Glaeser, Edward L.; Laibson, David I.; Schei

43、nkman, Jose A. and Soutter, Christine L. 2000, Measuring Trust. Quartery Journal of Economics, 115, pp. 811-46.Cox, J., 2004, “How to Identify Trust and Reciprocity”, Games and Economic Behavior, 46, pp.260281. Gchter, S., Herrmann, B. and Thni, C., 2004, “Trust, voluntary cooperation, and socio-eco

44、nomic background: survey and experimental evidence”, Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 55(4), pp.505531.Holm, H. J. and A. Danielson, 2005, “Tropic Trust versus Nordic Trust: Experimental Evidence From Tanzania And Sweden”, The Economic Journal, 115(503), 505532.Karlan, D., 2005, “Using

45、 Experimental Economics to Measure Social Capital and Predict Financial Decisions”, American Economic Review, 95(5), pp. 1688-1699.Bouma, J., Bulte, E., and Soest, V.D., 2008, “Trust and Cooperation: Social Capital and Community Resource Management”, Journal of Environmental Economics and Management

46、, 56, pp.155166.信任問題Trust and Trustworthiness合作問題Marwell, G. and Ames, R.E. Experiments on the Provision of Public Goods. I. Resources, Interest, Group Size, and the Free-rider Problem, American Journal of Sociology, 1979, 84(6):13351360Isaac, R.M. and J. M. Walker, “Group Size Effects in Public Goo

47、ds Provision: the Voluntary Contributions Mechanism”, Quarterly Journal of Economics, 1988, 103(1), 179200.Andreoni, J. Why Free Ride? Strategies and Learning in Public Goods Experiments, Journal of Public Economics, 1988, 37:291304Ledyard, J. Public Goods: A Survey of Experimental Research, in Hand

48、book of Experimental Economics, eds. J. Kagel and A. Roth, Princeton University Press, Princeton, New Jersey, 1995Fehr, E. and S. Gchter, “Cooperation and Punishment in Public Goods Experiments”, American Economic Review, 2000a, 90(4), 980994.Fehr, E. and Gchter, S. Altruistic Punishment in Humans,

49、Nature, 2002, 415:137140Andreoni, J., Harbaugh, W. and Vesterlund, L. The Carrot or the Stick: Rewards, Punishments and Cooperation, American Economic Review, 2003, 93:893902Sefton, M., Shupp, R. and Walker, J. The Effect of Rewards and Sanctions in Provision of Public Goods, Economic Inquiry,2007,

50、45(4):671-690Carpenter, J. Punishing Free-Riders: How Group Size Affects Mutual Monitoring and the Provision of Public Goods, Games and Economic Behavior, 2007a, 60:3151Carpenter, J. The Demand for Punishment, Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 2007b, 62(4):522542Nikiforakis, N. S., “Pun

51、ishment and Counter-punishment in Public Goods Games: Can we Still Govern Ourselves?”, Journal of Public Economics, 2008, 92(1-2), 91112.Nikiforakis, N. S. and H.T. Normann, “A Comparative Statics Analysis of Punishment in Public Goods Experiments”, Experimental Economics, 2008, 11(4): 358369.Andreo

52、ni, J. and Croson, R. Partners versus Strangers: Random Rematching in Public Goods Experiments, in: C. R. Plott and V. L. Smith, eds., Handbook of Experimental Economics Results, Elsevier, The Netherlands, 2008Ananish Chaudhuri, “Sustaining cooperation in laboratory public goodsexperiments: a select

53、ive survey of the literature”, Experimental Economics, 2011, 14: 4783合作問題合作問題田野實驗Harrison, Glenn W., Morten Igel Lau, E. Elisabet Rutstrm and Melonie B. Williams, 2002, “Estimating Individual Discount Rates in Denmark: A Field Experiment,” American Economic Review 92:5 (December), 1606-1617. Harriso

54、n, Glenn W. and John A. List, 2004, Field Experiments, Journal of Economic Literature, 42(4), pp. 1009-1055.Carpenter, Jeffrey, Glenn Harrison, and John List, 2005 ” Field Experiments in Economics: An Introduction,” In: J. Carpenter, G. W. Harrison & J. A. List (Eds), Field Experiments in Economics.

55、 Greenwich, CT: JAI Press, Research in Experimental Economics,Vol. 10: 1-15.Harrison, Glenn W., 2005, ” Field Experiments and Control,” In: J. Carpenter, G. W. Harrison & J. A. List (Eds), Field Experiments in Economics. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press, Research in Experimental Economics,Vol. 10: 17-50.Ben

56、z, Matthias, and Stephan Meier, 2006, “Do People Behave in Experiments as in Real Life? Evidence from Donations,” Institute for Empirical Research in Economics, University of Zurich, Working Paper 248.List, John A, 2006, Field Experiments: A Bridge between Lab and Naturally Occurring Data, The B.E.

57、Journal of Economic Analysis & Policy, 6(2 - Advances), Article 8.Levitt, Steven D. and List, John A., 2007, “What Do Laboratory Experiments Measuring Social Preferences Reveal About the Real World?” Journal of Economic Perspectives, 21(2), 153-174.List, John A. and David Reiley, 2008, Field Experim

58、ents, The New Palgrave Dictionary of Economics, Steven N. Durlauf and Lawrence E. Blume, eds., Palgrave Macmillan Publishing, List, John A. and Michael K. Price, 2009, The Role of Social Connections in Charitable Fundraising: Evidence from A Natural Field Experiment, Journal of Economic Behavior and

59、Organization, 69(2), pp. 160-169.Levitt, Steven D. and John A. List, 2009,“Field Experiments in Economics: the Past, the Present, and the Future, European Economic Review, 53(1), pp. 1-18.Levitt, Steven D., John A. List, and David Reiley, 2010, “What Happens in the Field Stays in the Field: Professi

60、onals Do Not Play Minimax in Laboratory Experiments,” Econometrica, 78(4), pp. 1413-1434社會距離Hoffman, E., K. McCabe, K. Shachat, and V. Smith. Preferences, Property Rights and Anonymity in Bargaining Games. Games and Economic Behavior, 1994, 7(3), pp. 346-380. Hoffman, E., K. McCabe, and V. Smith. So