版權(quán)說明:本文檔由用戶提供并上傳,收益歸屬內(nèi)容提供方,若內(nèi)容存在侵權(quán),請進(jìn)行舉報或認(rèn)領(lǐng)
文檔簡介
千里之行,始于第2頁/共2頁精品文檔推薦GRE作文能得幾分看開頭就知道GRE作文能得幾分看開頭就知道?這些開頭段寫法要點(diǎn)不行不看,快來看看吧,下面我就和大家共享,來觀賞一下吧。
GRE作文能得幾分看開頭就知道?這些開頭段寫法要點(diǎn)不行不看
開門見山是開頭段寫法核心思路
開頭段的長度是考生首先要考慮好的一點(diǎn)。對于一篇GRE文章來說,開頭段應(yīng)留意開門見山簡潔扼要,通過短短幾句話把觀點(diǎn)表達(dá)清晰即可,一般建議以三句話為標(biāo)準(zhǔn)。過長的開頭段會給人頭重腳輕的感覺,從而導(dǎo)致文章整體失衡,是GRE寫作的大忌。有些考生過度強(qiáng)調(diào)開頭段的寫作,搜腸刮肚地把好詞妙句堆砌到開頭部分,其實這么做反而是大忌,很簡單引起考官的反感導(dǎo)致意外扣分。
高分開頭段從引用原文入手
這是許多考生都簡單忽視的一點(diǎn)。開頭段的第一句話,要先引用作文題目的內(nèi)容,通過引用自然過渡到論述當(dāng)中。沒頭沒腦的直接開頭論述,會讓人產(chǎn)生突兀的感覺,對于一篇以論述為主的文章來說是非常不利的。有些同學(xué)甚至老師生怕文章字?jǐn)?shù)不夠,在開頭的引用部分對原文題目進(jìn)行大量的PARAPHRASE改寫,想要多湊字?jǐn)?shù),這種投機(jī)取巧的方法一眼就會被考官發(fā)覺,反而會讓開頭變得累贅,模糊掉考生自己的觀點(diǎn),也是常常造成扣分的緣由之一。
ISSUE和ARGUMENT開頭段寫法有區(qū)分
GRE作文ISSUE的開頭段不必多說,直接闡明觀點(diǎn)就好。而駁論文ARGUMENT的開頭段,考生則需要做好兩件事。一是簡要說明論述的觀點(diǎn),二是指出觀點(diǎn)的漏洞。只要做到這兩點(diǎn),開頭段的作用就達(dá)到了。需要留意的是,在簡要說明觀點(diǎn)時,不要原句照抄題目中的觀點(diǎn),適當(dāng)變換一下表達(dá)方法是必要措施。另外,不要在開頭段中詳細(xì)綻開觀點(diǎn)的漏洞,簡潔點(diǎn)出問題在哪里即可。把具體綻開部分留到正文當(dāng)中。
GRE作文AW優(yōu)秀開頭段共享
由于開頭段需要簡潔,因此適當(dāng)套用一些常用句式模式是不錯的做法??忌梢蕴崆白鲆恍┠0宓念A(yù)備,盡量使用自己的語言來進(jìn)行敘述和整理,在寫開頭段時直接套用即可。下面是一些常用的開頭段句式:
“Thisplanislikelytofailduetoflawsinthereasoningandlogicoftheeditorial.”
“Thisremedyisunlikelytobesuccessfulduetoflawsinreasoning.”
“Thisargumentcontainssomeegregiousflawsinreasoningmakingtheconclusiondoubtful.”
“Thesuccessofthisrecommendationisdoubtfulconsideringthelogicalflawsandfaultyassumptionsonwhichitisbased.”
總而言之,開頭段的好壞關(guān)于整篇文章給考官留下的第一印象,就好比面試時著裝是否得體一樣,這種印象將在很大程度上影響考官之后的推斷和打分,因此我盼望大家重視GRE作文開頭段的寫作,爭取寫出能夠第一時間制服考官的優(yōu)秀開頭段。
GRE寫作中,Argument開頭如何寫好?
1.首句開門見山指出文章規(guī)律錯誤。
可以先通過一個小小的讓步,指出文章的論證有其道理(這里可以高度概括一下文章規(guī)律論證思路和方法bycomparison…with…)relatively/appearto/seemto/wellpresented/afterall(留意這里不要summerytheargument,要immediatelyengagetheargument!),然后筆鋒一轉(zhuǎn)however/while指出文章規(guī)律是有問題的。
2.簡潔概括文章的規(guī)律錯誤,用高度凝練的語言提示下文論證思路。
這里又分為好幾種方法:
a.用first/inaddition/also等清楚地列出文章規(guī)律錯誤和下文反對要點(diǎn)。
b.指出施行題目中建議的后果。
c.只提示下一段的論證,承接下一段(不推舉)。
d.用列舉他因的方式提示下文論證要點(diǎn)。
以官方范文為例
Argumenttest1:SpeedLimitsinForestville.
Discusshowwellreasonedyoufindthisargument.
“SixmonthsagotheregionofForestvilleincreasedthespeedlimitforvehiclestravelingontheregionshighwaysbytenmilesperhour.Sincethatchangetookeffect,thenumberofautomobileaccidentsinthatregionhasincreasedby15percent.ButthespeedlimitinElmsford,aregionneighboringForestville,remainedunchanged,andautomobileaccidentsdeclinedslightlyduringthesamesix-monthperiod.Therefore,ifthecitizensofForestvillewanttoreducethenumberofautomobileaccidentsontheregionshighways,theyshouldcampaigntoreduceForestvillesspeedlimittowhatitwasbeforetheincrease.”
ModelsfromPracticeBook
6分:
Theagrumentiswell-presented,butnotthoroughlywell-reasoned.BymakingacomparisonoftheregionofForestville,thetownwiththehigherspeedlimitandthereforeautomobileaccidents,withtheregionofElmsford,anareaofalowerspeedlimitandsubsequentlyfeweraccidents,theargumentforreducingForestvillesspeedlimitsinordertodecreaseaccidentsseemslogical.
However,
這篇開頭一開頭就直截了當(dāng)指出這篇argument是notwellreasoned,然后高度概括了題目中的要點(diǎn)和題目的觀點(diǎn),下文反對的第一段就用however承接,規(guī)律連貫,是大家比較喜愛的argument開頭。
Argumenttest2:ScottWoods
Thefollowingappearedasalettertotheeditorofalocalnewspaper.
Fiveyearsago,weresidentsofMorgantonvotedtokeepthepubliclyownedpieceoflandknownasScottWoodsinanatural,undevelopedstate.Ourthinkingwasthat,ifnoshoppingcentersorhouseswerebuiltthere,ScottWoodswouldcontinuetobenefitourcommunityasanaturalparkland.Butnowthatourtownplanningcommitteewantstopurchasethelandandbuildaschoolthere,weshouldreconsiderthisissue.Ifthelandbecomesaschoolsite,noshoppingcentersorhousescanbebuiltthere,andsubstantialacreagewouldprobablybedevotedtoathleticfields.Therewouldbenobetteruseoflandinourcommunitythanthis,sincealargemajorityofourchildrenparticipateinsports,andScottWoodswouldcontinuetobenefitourcommunityasnaturalparkland.
ThislettertotheeditorbeginsbystatingthereasonstheresidentsofMorgantonvotedtokeepScottWoodsinanundevelopedstate.Theletterstatesthattheentirecommunitycouldbenefitfromanundevelopedparkland.Theresidentsofthetownwantedtoensurethatnoshoppingcentersorhouseswouldbebuiltthere.This,inturn,wouldprovideeveryoneinthecommunitywithavaluableresource,anaturalpark.
Theletterthencontinuesbyaddressingtheissueofbuildingaschoolontheland.Theauthorreasonsthatthiswouldalsobenefittheentirecommunityasanaturalparklandsincemuchofthelandwouldbedevotedtoathleticfields.Theauthorofthelettercomestotheconclusionthatbuildingaschoolonthelandwouldbethebestthingforeveryoneinthecommunity.
Thisletterisaone-sidedargumentaboutthebestuseofthelandknownasScottWoods.Theauthormaybeaparentwhosechildwouldbenefitfromanewschool,ateacherwhothinksaschoolwouldboostthecommunity,orjustaresidentofMorganton.Regardlessofwhotheauthoris,therearemanyaspectsofthisplanthatheorshehasoverlookedorchosentoignore.
這篇文章的開頭實在是太長了,個人不建議寫這樣的開頭,前兩段全部是對題目的改寫,第三段還用了兩行去猜這個argument的身份,究竟我們只有30min去寫一篇argument,我認(rèn)為開頭還是開門見山,簡潔明白地表明文章觀點(diǎn)比較好,把重點(diǎn)放在后面的論證部分。
我們可以看到commentary對這種開頭也并不看好!
COMMENTARY
Thisoutstandingresponsebeginssomewhathesitantly;theopeningparagraphssummarizebutdonotimmediatelyengagetheargument.(留意,這句話的意思是,rater盼望看到的是immediatelyengagetheargument的文章,而不是summarizetheargument!)However,thesubsequentparagraphstargetthecentralflawsintheargumentandanalyzetheminalmostmicroscopicdetail.
Argumenttest3:SmileBright
Discusshowwellreasonedyoufindthisargument.
ArecentsurveyofdentalpatientsshowedthatpeoplewhouseSmile-Brighttoothpastearemostlikelytohavecappedteeth--artificialbutnatural-lookingprotectivecoveringsplacedbydentistsonindividualteeth.ThosepeoplewhohadbegunusingSmile-BrighttoothpasteearlyinlifeweremorelikelytohavecappedteeththanwerepeoplewhohadbegunusingSmile-Brightlaterinlife.Inaddition,thosewhoreportedbrushingtheirteethmorethantwiceadaywithSmile-BrighttoothpasteweremorelikelytohavecapsontheirteeththanwerethosewhoreportedbrushingwithSmile-Brightlessfrequently.Therefore,peoplewishingtoavoidhavingtheirteethcappedshouldnotuseSmile-Brighttoothpaste.
Theargumentcontainsseveralfacetsthatarequestionable.First,thereliabilityandgeneralizabilityofthesurveyareopentoquesiton.Inaddition,theargumentassumesacorrelationamountstoacausalrelationship.Theargumentalsofailstoexaminealternativeexplanations.Iwilldiscusseachofthesefacetsinturn.
這篇開頭特別清楚地直接指出了文章的三個規(guī)律錯誤,既高度概括了題目的規(guī)律錯誤點(diǎn),又提示了下文的規(guī)律論證挨次和內(nèi)容,使人一目了然,可以學(xué)習(xí)這種方式。
Argumenttest4:RollerSkating
Discusshowwellreasonedyoufindthisargument.
Hospitalstatisticsregardingpeoplewhogototheemergencyroomafterrollerskatingaccidentsindicatetheneedformoreprotectiveequipment.Withinthisgroupofpeople,75percentofthosewhohadaccidentsinstreetsorparkinglotswerenotwearinganyprotectiveclothing(helmets,kneepads,etc.)oranylight-reflectingmaterial(clip-onlights,glow-in-the-darkwristpads,etc.).Clearly,thesestatisticsindicatethatbyinvestinginhigh-qualityprotectivegearandreflectiveequipment,rollerskaterswillgreatlyreducetheirriskofbeingseverelyinjuredinanaccident.
Benchmark6
Thenotionthatprotectivegearreducestheinjuriessufferedinaccidentsseemsatfirstglancetobeanobviousconclusion.Afterall,(先來一個小讓步)itistheintentoftheseproductstoeitherpreventaccidentsfromoccuringinthefirstplaceortoreducetheinjuriessufferedbythewearershouldanaccidentoccur.However,theconclusionthatinvestinginhighqualityprotectivegeargreatlyreducestheriskofbeingseverelyinjuredinanaccidentmaymaskother(andpotentiallymoresignificant)causesofinjuriesandmayinspirepeopletooverinvestfinanciallyandpsychologicallyinprotectivegear.(指出了施行題目中建議的后果)
這篇開頭先高度概括題目中的結(jié)論,然后以afterall引出一個小讓步,再用However指出假如實施這個建議會帶來什么后果,高度概括這個conclusion存在的兩個問題:忽視他因和人們的錯誤投資,為下文的論證做鋪墊。
Argumenttest5:UniversityofClaria
Discusshowwellreasonedyoufindthisargument.
TheUniversityofClariaisgenerallyconsideredoneofthebestuniversitiesintheworldbecauseofitsinstructorsreputation,whichisbasedprimarilyontheextensiveresearchandpublishingrecordofcertainfacultymembers.Inaddition,severalfacultymembersareinternationallyrenownedasleadersintheirfields.Forexample,manyofthefacultyfromtheEnglishdepartmentareregularlyinvitedtoteachatuniversitiesinothercountries.Furthermore,tworecentgraduatesofthephysicsdepartmenthavegoneontobecomecandidatesfortheNobelPrizeinPhysics.And75percentofthestudentsareabletofindemploymentaftergraduating.Therefore,becauseofthereputationofitsfaculty,theUniversityofClariashouldbetheobviouschoiceforanyoneseekingaqualityeducation.
SAMPLE-1(score6)
WhiletheUniversityofClariaappearstohaveanexcellentreputationbasedontheaccomplishmentsandreputationsofitsfaculty,onewouldalsowishtoconsiderotherissuesbeforedecidinguponthisparticularinstitutionforundergraduateorgraduatetraining.(開門見山對題目中的建議提出質(zhì)疑,通過先讓步再轉(zhuǎn)折的方法,先高度概括題目大意,再指出自己的觀點(diǎn)。)ThePhysicsandEnglishdepartmentsareinternationallyknown,buttheseareonlytwooftheareasinwhichonemightstudy.Otherdepartmentsarenotlisted;isthisbecausenoothersareworthmentioning,orbecausenootherdepartmentsbotheredtoturnintheiraccomplishmentsandkudostothepublicityoffice?(直接開頭引出第一個TS)
這篇開頭也是開門見山對題目中的建議進(jìn)行質(zhì)疑,并引出第一個反對的分論點(diǎn),下文緊接著這一段的末句綻開論證,個人比較喜愛第一句,對其次句不是很有愛,最好能提示全文,不要只提示下一段吧。
Argumenttest6:SilverScreenMovies
Discusshowwellreasonedyoufindthisargument.
ThefollowingistakenfromamemofromtheadvertisingdirectoroftheSilverScreenMovieProductionCompany.
Accordingtoarecentreportfromourmarketingdepartment,fewerpeopleattendedmoviesproducedbySilverScreenduringthepastyearthaninanyotheryear.AndyetthepercentageofgenerallyfavorablecommentsbymoviereviewersaboutspecificSilverScreenmoviesactuallyincreasedduringthisperiod.Clearly,thecontentsofthesereviewsarenotreachingenoughofourprospectiveviewers;sotheproblemliesnotwiththequalityofourmoviesbutwiththepublicslackofawarenessthatmoviesofgoodqualityareavailable.SilverScreenshouldthereforespendmoreofitsbudgetnextyearonreachingthepublicthroughadvertisingandlessonproducingnewmovies.
SAMPLE-1(score6)
Theargumentpresentedaboveisrelativelysound,however,theauthorfailstorecognizealltheelementsnecessarytoevaluatehissituation.Theideathatmoremoneybeinvestedinadvertisingmaybeahelpfulone,butperhapsnotbecausepeopleareunawareofthecurrentreviews.Toclarify,itmaybenecessarytoadvertisemoreinordertoincreasesales,howeverthatcouldbeduetomanycircumstancessuchasadecreaseinthepublicsoverallattendance,anincreaseinthecostofmovies,oralackoftrustintheopinionsofthereviewers.
這篇范文感覺跟大部分人寫的文章結(jié)構(gòu)很相近,大家朝著這個方向努力可能相對簡單些。開頭還是先開門見山指出題目是有問題的,然后簡潔指出題目的問題出在忽視了其他可能的緣由,然后再用簡潔的語言分別概括了三個他因。
GRE寫作開頭和結(jié)尾經(jīng)典句型
開頭
1.Thearguermayberightabout…,butheseemstoneglect(fail)tomention(takeintoaccount)thefactthat….
2.Althoughmanypeoplebelievethat…,Idoubt(wonder)whethertheargumentbearsmuchanalysis(closeexamination).
3.Itwouldbepossible(natural/reasonable)tothink(believe/taketheview)that…,butitwouldbeabsurd(wrong)toclaim(argue)that…
結(jié)尾
1.Fromwhathasbeendiscussedabove(Takingintoaccountallthesefactors/Judgingfromallevidenceoffered),wemaydraw(reach/cometo/arriveat)theconclusionthat…
2.Itishightimethatwepla
溫馨提示
- 1. 本站所有資源如無特殊說明,都需要本地電腦安裝OFFICE2007和PDF閱讀器。圖紙軟件為CAD,CAXA,PROE,UG,SolidWorks等.壓縮文件請下載最新的WinRAR軟件解壓。
- 2. 本站的文檔不包含任何第三方提供的附件圖紙等,如果需要附件,請聯(lián)系上傳者。文件的所有權(quán)益歸上傳用戶所有。
- 3. 本站RAR壓縮包中若帶圖紙,網(wǎng)頁內(nèi)容里面會有圖紙預(yù)覽,若沒有圖紙預(yù)覽就沒有圖紙。
- 4. 未經(jīng)權(quán)益所有人同意不得將文件中的內(nèi)容挪作商業(yè)或盈利用途。
- 5. 人人文庫網(wǎng)僅提供信息存儲空間,僅對用戶上傳內(nèi)容的表現(xiàn)方式做保護(hù)處理,對用戶上傳分享的文檔內(nèi)容本身不做任何修改或編輯,并不能對任何下載內(nèi)容負(fù)責(zé)。
- 6. 下載文件中如有侵權(quán)或不適當(dāng)內(nèi)容,請與我們聯(lián)系,我們立即糾正。
- 7. 本站不保證下載資源的準(zhǔn)確性、安全性和完整性, 同時也不承擔(dān)用戶因使用這些下載資源對自己和他人造成任何形式的傷害或損失。
最新文檔
- 建筑工程承包施工協(xié)議書(32篇)
- 新生軍訓(xùn)表演主持詞(3篇)
- 藥店工作總結(jié)范文
- 幼兒園中班語言領(lǐng)域教學(xué)活動方案(34篇)
- 教學(xué)質(zhì)量管理工作總結(jié)
- 關(guān)于小學(xué)生開學(xué)典禮演講稿(10篇)
- 旅行社團(tuán)隊接待服務(wù)標(biāo)準(zhǔn)
- 保定學(xué)院《全媒體運(yùn)營》2022-2023學(xué)年第一學(xué)期期末試卷
- 保定學(xué)院《教師書寫技能》2022-2023學(xué)年第一學(xué)期期末試卷
- 學(xué)校開學(xué)安全隱患自查表
- 煙氣阻力計算
- 驗收人員組成表
- 化學(xué)工程與工藝-年產(chǎn)12萬噸合成氨變換工段工藝設(shè)計[1]
- 語音偽裝器的matlab實現(xiàn)
- 深圳市生育保險津貼申請表+(范本)
- 護(hù)士首次注冊體檢表
- 部編版三年級上冊語文 15 搭船的鳥(第1課時) 公開課課件
- 空冷安裝指導(dǎo)1
- 園林綠化苗木價格大全種苗木報價全集
- 火燒圓明園始末
- GB_T 36787-2018 紙漿模塑餐具(高清正版)
評論
0/150
提交評論