AuditBoard+數字風險報告2023-英_第1頁
AuditBoard+數字風險報告2023-英_第2頁
AuditBoard+數字風險報告2023-英_第3頁
AuditBoard+數字風險報告2023-英_第4頁
AuditBoard+數字風險報告2023-英_第5頁
已閱讀5頁,還剩45頁未讀, 繼續(xù)免費閱讀

下載本文檔

版權說明:本文檔由用戶提供并上傳,收益歸屬內容提供方,若內容存在侵權,請進行舉報或認領

文檔簡介

1

TableofContents

Introduction

1

HowDigitalRiskIsCreatingaHyperconnectedBusinessWorld—andaFragmentedApproachtoRisk

5

HowIRMandIRMTechnologyBridgetheBusinessResilienceGap

14

KeyInsights:IntegratingORM,ITRM,ERM,andGRCtoManageDigitalRisk

18

Conclusion

21

AbouttheAuthor

22

AboutAuditBoard

Introduction

Digitalriskcontinuestobeoneofthefastest-growingandmostpervasiverisksforanyorganization.Asbusinessescontinuetoacceleratetheir

investmentsindigitaltransformation,digitalrisk—theinherent,unwanted,andunexpectedrisksmanifestedbytechnology—continuestoproliferate.Manyorganizationshaveinvestedindigitaltransformationwithoutmakingtheneededinvestmentsin

integratedriskmanagement

(IRM).Toensure

thatdigitaltechnologiescanwithstandwidespread,complexdigitalrisks,

businessesfaceanincreasinglypressingneedtobridgethe“businessresiliencegap”thatresultsfromriskmanagementtechnologiesand

processesnotkeepingpacewithrisingriskdemands.

Digitalbusinessinvestmentcontinuestoaccelerate.IDCreportedthat

worldwidedigitaltransformationinvestmentreached$1.8trillionin20221,andMcKinseyprojectedthattheglobalvalueofloTproductsandserviceswill

reach$12.6trillionby2030.2Atthesametime,thequalityofdigitalbusinessinvestmentishighlysuspect,andcyberattackerscontinuetofindand

exploitvulnerabilitiesinpoor-qualitysoftware.DarkReadingfoundthat88%

ofcodebasesuseopen-sourcecomponentsthathaven’tbeenupdatedin

thepasttwoyears3,andGartner(asreportedbyTheWallStreetJournal)

estimatesthatlessthan50%ofcompanies’APIswillbemanagedproperlyby2025becausetheirgrowthwilleclipsetheabilityoftheirmanagementtools.4Thefinancialimpactisenormous:TheConsortiumforInformation&SoftwareQuality(CISQ)hasestimatedthatthecostofpoor-qualitysoftwareinthe

U.S.hasgrowntoatleast$2.4trillion.5

Riskmanifestedbytechnologyinbusinessoperationsisknownas“digitalrisk.”

Itistheriskassociatedwiththecreation,delivery,anduseofnewdigitalprocesses,products,andservices.

See“

TheEssentialsofIRM

”foradeeperdive.

1IDC,

WorldwideDigitalTransformationSpendingGuide

,2022.

2McKinseyGlobalInstitute,

TheInternetofThings:CatchingUptoanAccelerating

Opportunity

,2021.

3DarkReading,“

80%ofSoftwareCodebasesContainatLeastOneVulnerability

,”2022.

4TheWallStreetJournal,“

T-MobileBreachHighlightsCommonCorporateSecurity

Weakness

,”2023.

5CISQ,

CostofPoorSoftwareQualityintheU.S.:A2022Report

,2022.

3

Digitalriskiscreatingahyperconnectedbusinessworld,astheuseoftechnologyextendswellbeyondanorganization’sfourwallswithdigitalproductsandservices

enabledbythird-partyorganizations.Butasdigitalbusinessgrows,sodothird-partyecosystemsandbusinessdisruptions—andthemostdisruptiveandcostlyrisk

eventsacrossarangeofindustriestypicallyinvolveathirdparty.Plus,organizationsoftenlackvisibilityintoorcontroloverthetechnologiesbeingused.Newdigitaltechnologiesoftenfallundertheumbrellaof“

shadowIT

,”whichincludesIT-relatedautomateddevices,software,andservicesthatareusedandpurchasedoutsidethedirectcontrolofcentralizedITorganizations.

Intoday’sbusinessworld,uniquecombinationsoftechnologyassets,businessprocesses,andstrategicobjectivesareutilizedtobringdigitalbusinesstolife.However,unanticipatedconsequencesofthesecombinationscanleadtounwantedbusinessoutcomes.ExamplesareshowninFigure1.

Organizationsmustworktobridgethegapthatiscreatedwhenrisk

managementtechnologiesandprocessesfailtokeepupwiththeevolving

demandsofdigitalrisk.Werefertothisshortfallinriskmanagementcapabilitiesasthe“

businessresiliencegap

.”Businessleadersthatareabletobridgethegapcannotonlyachievestrongerresilienceagainstunwantedbusinessoutcomes,butalsounlockuntappedpotentialvaluetoenablebetterperformance,greaterassurance,

andmorecost-effectivecompliance.

(Figure1)

4

AsAuditBoard’s2023DigitalRisksurveyof130+riskleadersfound,mostorganizations

arestrugglingtomaturetheirriskmanagementcapabilities.Digitalriskexpandsas

investmentindigitaltransformationaccelerates,andmostorganizationsstillhave

ahighlyfragmentedapproachtomanagingthesenewrisks.Oursurveyexplored

thedigitalriskmanagementprogramsandtechnologiesthatorganizationscurrently

relyupontobetterunderstandtheirdigitalrisklandscapeanddigitalriskmanagement

maturity,integration,andtechnologyadoption.Keyinsightsinclude:

?Digitalriskmanagementisdistributedacrossindividualriskmanagementprograms.

?Maturitylevelsvarywidelyacrosstheuniversallyapplicableriskobjectivesofperformance,resilience,assurance,andcompliance—particularlycompliance(moremature)andresilience(lessmature).

?Nineoutoftenorganizationsaremaintainingorincreasingtechnologyinvestmentsacrossallriskobjectives.

?Eightoutoftenorganizationslackreportablemetricsthatimpendingregulatorychangeswillmandate.

Toensurethatdigitaltechnologiescanwithstandtheincreasingriskcomingfrom

multipledirections—especiallyfromevolvingcomplexityinthethird-partyecosystem

—organizationsmustcontinuetoincreaseriskmanagementinvestmentand

maturity,particularlyintheresiliencespace.Tothatend,AuditBoard’s2023Digital

RiskReportalsofocusesonhowdigitaltransformationitselfisthekeytoeffective

IRM.Byunderstandingcommonchallenges,trends,regulatoryimpacts,andIRMbest

practices,youcanhelpyourorganizationmatureitsriskmanagementcapabilitiesto

moreeffectivelykeeppacewiththeexpandingspectrumofrisk.

5

DigitalRiskReport—TopTakeawaysin2023

79%

oforganizationslackreportable

metricsthatimpendingregulatory

changeswillmandate.

21%

oforganizationsarenotmanagingor

monitoringthird-partydigitalrisk.

44%

oforganizationsprimarilyusemanualtechnologies(spreadsheets,email,shareddrives,SharePoint)tomanagedigitalrisk.

93%

oforganizationsanticipatemaintaining

orincreasingtheirinvestmentin

technologyforperformance,resilience,assurance,andcomplianceinthenext18-24months.

6

HowDigitalRiskIsCreatingaHyperconnectedBusinessWorld—andaFragmentedApproachtoRisk

Asdigitalbusinessgrows,sodoesthevastnatureofour

digitalandthird-party

ecosystems

(e.g.,vendors,suppliers,partners),ourdependencyuponthem—andtheresultingriskforpotentialbusinessdisruptionandotherunwantedbusiness

outcomes.Oursurveyresultsneverthelessshowthatmostorganizationshaveinvestedindigitaltechnologieswithoutprioritizingmaturationoftheirrisk

managementpractices.Instead,theyarerelyingonfragmentedapproaches

anddisconnected(oftenmanual)technologies,processes,andactivitiesthat

arenotintegratedintobroaderriskmanagementoralignedwithoverallbusinessoperations.Asaresult,thebusinessresiliencegapcontinuestowiden.

Furthermore,whiledigitalriskismanifestedacrossthebusiness,it’soften

treatedasanITriskmanagement(ITRM)problem.AsshowninFigure2,whenriskleaderswereaskedtoidentifythefunctionsresponsibleformanagingdigitalriskintheirorganizations,morethan50%indicated“technology,”andnoother

answeroptionreceivedmorethan17%ofthevote.Theseresultssupportthe

findingthatorganizationslargelyaren’tconnectingdigitalriskmanagementwith

theotherriskmanagementprogramareasof

operationalriskmanagement(ORM)

,enterpriseriskmanagement(ERM),andgovernance,risk,andcompliance(GRC).

Whoisresponsibleformanagingdigitalriskinyourorganization?

(Figure2)

7

Theseresultsaresimilartolastyear’s,withaslightincreaseinorganizationsentrustingtheirtechnologyfunctionswiththisresponsibility(upfrom45%in2022to50%in2023).Inaddition,83%ofrespondentsassociateddigitalriskmanagementwithgroupsotherthanbusinessoperations—anincreasefrom78%in2022.

TheincreasingconcentrationofdigitalriskmanagementactivitiesintheITRMspacemaysignalthatorganizationsare,atminimum,givingdigitalrisksomedegreeoftheheightenedattentionitdeserves.Butthistendencymaynotbodewellforoverallriskmanagementeffectiveness,sincedigitaltechnologyinvestmentshappenacrosstheorganizationandoftenasshadowIT.Ideally,digitalriskmanagementshouldbemoreevenlyspreadacrosstheorganizationandmorefocusedinthebusinessoperationsspace,withcollaborationenabledacrossthevariousgroups.

IRMoffersa

betterpathforward

,helpingbusinessestoconnectrisksandteams

acrossthebusinessbylinkingstrategic,operational,technological,andotherriskswithstrategicbusinessobjectives.Aswe’lldiscusslaterinthisreport,IRMcanguidecompaniesinconnectingthedotsondigitalriskwhilesupportingtheneededdigital

transformation.Butfirst,let’slookathowthisdisconnectedapproachtomanagingdigitalriskismanifestinginandimpactingorganizations.

1.DigitalRiskManagementIsLackinginMaturity

Organizationslookingtogetaheadofdigitalriskmustadvancedigitalriskmanagementmaturity.Intheearlystages,they’redefiningandassessingrisksandestablishingthe

requiredfoundationsforincreasingmaturity.Thistypicallyinvolvesmovingfrommanual,piecemealapproachestoautomated,technology-enabledprocesses,andprogressingfromrelyingprimarilyonqualitativemetricstoamorerobustmixofqualitativeand

quantitativemetrics.Asorganizationsprogressfurtheralongthematurityspectrum,theymovetoactiveriskmitigationandultimatelycontinuousriskmonitoring.

Oursurveyaskedriskleaderstoratetheirorganizations’digitalriskmanagementmaturity.AsshowninFigure3,maturitylevelsareallacrosstheboard.

Howwouldyoudescribeyourorganization’sdigitalrisk

managementmaturitylevel?

(Figure3)

8

Whenwezoomout,however,thebigpictureissobering:

?Threeoutoffourorganizationsreporttheyaresignificantlylackinginmaturity.

Thisfigurecomprises12%thatdonotmanagedigitalrisk,19%thatarestilldefiningdigitalrisk,and44%thatareatthepointofassessingdigitalriskwithquantitativeand/orqualitativemetrics.Interestingly,thenumberofrespondentswhoreportedbeingatthestagesofdefiningorqualitativelyassessingdigitalriskactually

increasedfromlastyear’ssurveyresults.Readersmayhaveexpectedtheoppositetrend,sincelowerresultsinthosecategoriesmightheraldincreasingmaturity.(In2022,10%weredefiningand25%wereassessingqualitatively.)

?Onlyaboutoneinfourorganizationsisonthematureendofthespectrum.Thisincludes15%oforganizationsthatareactivelymitigatingdigitalrisk,and11%that

arecontinuouslymonitoringdigitalrisk.

2.DigitalRiskManagementIsHighlyFragmented

Effectivemanagementofdigitalriskrequiresunderstandingitsfullscopeacrosstheentireorganizationanditsthird-partyecosystem.Accordingly,animportantelementofadvancingmaturityisensuringthatdigitalriskmanagementeffortsarepartofanintegrated,enterprise-wideriskmanagementapproachthatiscloselyalignedwithbusinessoperations.Foundationaltothisapproachislookingbeyondtechnologyrisks(e.g.,technical,cybersecurity)tounderstandpotentialrisksacrossthe

business,breakingdownsilos,andhelpingtobuildorganization-wideawarenessofdigitalriskacrossfunctions.Mostcompaniesappeartobefacingchallengesinthis

areaaswell,asreflectedinFigure4.

Howwouldyoudescribeyourorganization’sdigitalrisk

managementmaturitylevel?

(Figure4)

9

Oursurveyresultssignalashifttomorecompaniesaddressingdigitalriskaspartof

theITRMprogramarea,with44%ofriskleadersreportingthatdigitalrisksareprimarilyaddressedandreportedwithinbroaderriskmanagementactivitiesbytheirITand

cyberriskmanagementgroups(upfrom33%in2022).Thisfindingechoesthegeneralconcentrationofresponsibilityinthetechnologyfunctionthatwesawrepresentedin

Figure2.

Theseresultsmayindicateasiloedviewofriskthatfocusesontechnology

risksoverotherbusinessrisks.We’lldivefurtherintothepotentialproblemsandimplicationsofthisapproachinthefollowingsections.

3.DigitalRiskDemandIsOutstrippingRiskManagementCapacity

Whiledigitalriskdemandcontinuestoincreaseexponentially,growthinrisk

managementcapacityremainsslow.Therealityisthatfragmented,inflexible,and

compliance-drivenlegacyGRCsoftwaresimplycannotprovidetheconnectedrisk

capabilitiesneededtokeeppacewithdigitalrisk—andasaresult,mostorganizationsarestillrelyingonpiecemealmanualprocesses,asshowninFigure5.

Whattechnologiesareyouprimarilyusingtomanagedigitalrisk?

(Figure5)

10

Comparingtheseresultsto2022’sfindings,thenumberoforganizationsnot

managingdigitalriskreducedslightly,from11%to8%.Organizationsusing

manualtechnologiesfordigitalriskmanagement—anapproachthattends

tobeverytime-consuming—actuallyincreased,from38%in2022to44%in2023.Useofon-premiseorcloud-basedriskmanagementsoftware,however,remainedlargelythesame.Insum,nearlyhalfoftheorganizationssurveyed(48%)arestillnotleveragingavailableriskmanagementtechnology

solutionstoadvancedigitalriskmanagementmaturity.

4.CompaniesLackVisibilityonThird-PartyRisk

Onekeywaythat

third-partyriskintroducesmorecomplexity

isduetothesheernumberofentitiesandtechnologies(relativetodigitalbusinessactivities)that

organizationsneedtotrackandmonitor.Formostorganizations,it’sdifficulttounderstandthefullextentofthedigitalecosystemthatispartofthebusiness.

Indeed,surveyresultsindicatedthatorganizationshavelimitedvisibility

aroundwheredigitalinvestmentsarebeingmade(e.g.,products,services,processes)andlimitedunderstandingoftherisksthoseinvestmentsbring.

ThisiswherethecomplicationsofshadowITcomeintoplay.Because

organizationsdon’thavethesamecentralizedcontrolandviewontechnologyasinyearspast,thedecentralizednatureofdigitalbusinessbecomesmore

problematic.

Effectivedigitalriskmanagementrequiresimprovedvisibilityintothefullscope

ofthird-partydigitalrisk.Whenriskleaderswereaskedabouttheprocesses

usedformanagingandmonitoringthird-partyrisk,however,theirresponses(seeFigure6)showlittleprogressfrom2022.

Howareyoumanagingandmonitoringthird-partydigitalrisk?

(Figure6)

11

?Approximately1in5organizations(21%)arenotmanagingand

monitoringthird-partydigitalrisk.Thisisasmalldecreasefrom2022(26%).

?Morethanhalfoforganizationsrelyonqualitativeassessment

approachesofferinglimitedeffectiveness.Specifically,56%ofriskleadersarerelyingonlyonqualitativeriskassessments,with24%basingtheir

assessmentsoninternalviewsofthirdpartiesonly—anapproachofferingverylimitedeffectiveness.

?Approximately1in5organizationsaretakingthemostmatureapproachtomanagingthird-partydigitalrisk.Upslightlyfrom18%in2022,22%of

riskleadersreportedusingthemostmatureapproach(i.e.,“Qualitativeandquantitativeriskassessmentbasedoninternalandexternalviewssupportedbyriskquestionnaires,targetedaudit,andindependentdataanalysis[e.g.,

securityratingservices]”).

Thesurveyalsoaskedriskleaderstoidentifytheirgreatestchallengewhen

managingandmonitoringthird-partydigitalrisk.AsshowninFigure7,weseeafairlywideandevendistributionacrossresponses.

Whatisyourgreatestchallengewhenmanagingandmonitoring

third-partydigitalrisk?

(Figure7)

12

Theseresultsreinforcehowthird-partydigitalriskpresentschallengesacrosstheorganization,withbusinesscontinuityandcontract/SLAcompliancetied

forNo.1andregulatorycomplianceanduseofAPIs(technologyintegration)

fairlyeven.Withregulatorsandstandard-setters

stilldeterminingtherightpath

forwardforenvironmental,social,andgovernance(ESG)reportingrequirements,ESGisn’tcurrentlyashighonmostorganizations’radar.

5.CompaniesLackReportableMetrics—WhichImpending

RegulationsWillMandate

Monitoringbasedonreportablemetricsisabetteroverallprocessfordigital

riskmanagementthanrelyingonperiodicriskassessments.Butorganizationscontinuetolagintheiruseofreportablemetrics,evenasimpending

regulatorychangeswillrequireswiftadoption.Beforetakingadeeperdiveontheexpectedcybersecuritydisclosurerequirementsandtheirlikelyimpact,

however,let’sexaminethecurrentstate.AsFigure8reflects,approximatelyfouroutoffiveorganizations(79%)arenotusingreportablemetricstoeffectively

managedigitalrisk.

Areyouusingreportablemetricstoeffectivelymanagedigitalrisk?

(Figure8)

13

Thisfiguremarksasmallreductionfrom2022results(droppingfrom84%).Inotherwords,maturityinthisareaislargelynotchanging,thoughtherisksmostcertainlyare.

AsshowninFigure9,wealsoaskedriskleaderstoaddresshowtheyuseanyreportablemetricsthattheydohave.

Digitalrisksaremanifestedthroughoutthedigitalproduct/service

developmentprocess.Identifythestageswhereyoucurrentlyutilize

reportabledigitalriskmetrics.

It’sstrikingthatwhile79%ofrespondentsadmittednotusingreportablemetricsinthepreviousquestion,only41%ofthesamerespondentsofferedthesameresponsetothisone.Aportionofthedisparitymaybeexplainedbytheuseoftheword“effectively”in

thepriorquestion:Riskleadersmaybeawarethatwhilereportablemetricsarebeingusedincertainstagesoftheprocess,theyarenotbeingused“effectively.”Anotherpossibleexplanationisthatorganizationsoftenwanttobelievethatthemetricsthey’reusingarereportable—wheninfacttheyarenot.

Wealsonoteincreasesacrosstheboardandabetteroveralldistributionthanin2022.Moststrikingarethe10–20percentagepointincreasesfortheuseofreportable

metricsindecision-making(from17%to34%),implementation(from16%to37%),

andmonitoring(from30%to44%).Whileuseinplanningalsoincreased(from28%to34%),wewouldhaveexpectedtoseeagreaterincrease,giventheimportanceoftheopportunityforusingreportablemetricstounderstandifandhowgoalsarebeingmetandwhereplansmayneedtochange.

UNPACKINGTHEIMPENDINGREGULATORYCHANGES

It’stimeforarealitycheckforthefouroutoffiveorganizationsthataren’tyetusingreportablemetrics.Manywillsoonbeforcedtoadoptreportablemetricsby

theU.S.SecuritiesandExchangeCommission(SEC)cybersecuritydisclosurerequirementsexpectedin2023.

Untilrecently,therehasbeennorealurgencyaroundusingreportablemetrics,withthe“need”forthemlargelytheoretical.ButwithfinalizationofSECcybersecurity

disclosurerules

expectedin2023

for(1)publiccompaniesand(2)investmentadvisersandprivatefunds,it’sabouttogetreal.

(Figure9)

14

ImmediateReportingRequirements

Form:8K

Timing:FourBusinessDays

Information:

1.Whentheincidentwasdiscoveredandwhetheritisongoing

2.Abriefdescriptionofthenatureandscopeoftheincident

3.Whetheranydatawasstolen,altered,accessed,orusedforanyotherunauthorizedpurpose

4.Effectoftheincidentonthecompany’soperations

5.Whetherthecompanyhasremediatedoriscurrentlyremediatingtheincident

Privatecompaniesshouldnotassumethattheseruleswon’timpactthem.

SimilarlegislationfromtheU.S.DepartmentofDefenseregardingversion2.0of

itsCybersecurityMaturityModelCertification(CMMC)andWallStreetfinancial

institutionoverseerNewYorkStateDepartmentofFinancialServices—longa

leadingindicatorofregulatorytrends—attestthatthesecybersecurityrule-makingeffortsarepartofmuchlargerregulatorytides.

Withthatcontextinmind,let’stakeacloserlookattheproposedSECcybersecuritydisclosurerulesforpubliccompanies,whicharerepresentativeofsimilarlegislation.Acriticalaspectofboththeimmediateandperiodicreportingrequirementsis

beingabletodeterminethematerialityofagivencybersecurityincident.Withinfourbusinessdaysofamaterialincident,organizationswouldneedtoidentify,quantify,anddescribematerialincidentsandtheiroperationalimpactsinpublicdisclosuresviaForm8-K.Materiality—understoodinfinancialterms—wouldbethetriggerfordisclosure.SeeFigure10foradditionaldetails.

MaterialCybersecurityIncidents

(Figure10)

PeriodicReportingRequirements

Form:10Qand/or10K

Timing:Quarterlyand/orannually

Information:

1.Sameasrequiredinformationonimmediatereporting

2.Includeanypreviouslyundisclosed,immaterialcybersecurityincidentsthatareclearlyrelatedandhavebecomematerialintheaggregate

3.Includeanyupdatesonindividualmaterialcybersecurityincidents

15

Withoutreportablemetricsinplace,organizationseitherwon’tbeabletodeterminewhetheranincidentismaterialorwillhavetorelyonadhocmeanstodoso.This

becomesariskinandofitself,becauseorganizationsthatarenotconsistentlyapplyingormeasuringmaterialitymayendupdisclosingsomethingthatisn’tmaterial—ornotdisclosingsomethingthatis.

CybersecurityRiskManagement&Governance(Figure11)

RiskManagementRequirements

Form:10KTiming:Annually

Information:

1.Ifthecompanyhasacybersecurityriskassessmentprogramanddescription

2.Useofconsultantsand/orotherthirdpartiesincybersecurityriskassessment

3.Thecompany’scyb

溫馨提示

  • 1. 本站所有資源如無特殊說明,都需要本地電腦安裝OFFICE2007和PDF閱讀器。圖紙軟件為CAD,CAXA,PROE,UG,SolidWorks等.壓縮文件請下載最新的WinRAR軟件解壓。
  • 2. 本站的文檔不包含任何第三方提供的附件圖紙等,如果需要附件,請聯(lián)系上傳者。文件的所有權益歸上傳用戶所有。
  • 3. 本站RAR壓縮包中若帶圖紙,網頁內容里面會有圖紙預覽,若沒有圖紙預覽就沒有圖紙。
  • 4. 未經權益所有人同意不得將文件中的內容挪作商業(yè)或盈利用途。
  • 5. 人人文庫網僅提供信息存儲空間,僅對用戶上傳內容的表現方式做保護處理,對用戶上傳分享的文檔內容本身不做任何修改或編輯,并不能對任何下載內容負責。
  • 6. 下載文件中如有侵權或不適當內容,請與我們聯(lián)系,我們立即糾正。
  • 7. 本站不保證下載資源的準確性、安全性和完整性, 同時也不承擔用戶因使用這些下載資源對自己和他人造成任何形式的傷害或損失。

評論

0/150

提交評論