個(gè)人信息大數(shù)據(jù)與刑事正當(dāng)程序的沖突及其調(diào)和

個(gè)人信息大數(shù)據(jù)與刑事正當(dāng)程序的沖突及其調(diào)和一、本文概述Overviewofthisarticle隨著信息技術(shù)的迅猛發(fā)展和大數(shù)據(jù)時(shí)代的到來(lái)，個(gè)人信息已經(jīng)滲透到社會(huì)生活的各個(gè)領(lǐng)域，并在刑事司法實(shí)踐中發(fā)揮著越來(lái)越重要的作用。然而，這一變革在推動(dòng)刑事司法進(jìn)步的也引發(fā)了個(gè)人信息大數(shù)據(jù)與刑事正當(dāng)程序之間的沖突。本文旨在深入探討這一沖突的具體表現(xiàn)、產(chǎn)生原因及其可能帶來(lái)的影響，并在此基礎(chǔ)上提出調(diào)和這一沖突的策略和建議。Withtherapiddevelopmentofinformationtechnologyandthearrivalofthebigdataera,personalinformationhaspenetratedintovariousfieldsofsociallifeandisplayinganincreasinglyimportantroleincriminaljusticepractice.However,thischangehasalsosparkedaconflictbetweenpersonalinformationbigdataandcriminaldueprocesswhilepromotingprogressincriminaljustice.Thisarticleaimstoexploreindepththespecificmanifestations,causes,andpossibleimpactsofthisconflict,andbasedonthis,proposestrategiesandsuggestionsforreconcilingthisconflict.我們將首先界定個(gè)人信息大數(shù)據(jù)的概念和特征，并闡述其在刑事司法中的應(yīng)用現(xiàn)狀。隨后，我們將分析刑事正當(dāng)程序的基本原則和要求，以揭示個(gè)人信息大數(shù)據(jù)與刑事正當(dāng)程序在數(shù)據(jù)采集、處理、利用等環(huán)節(jié)上可能存在的沖突點(diǎn)。這些沖突包括但不限于數(shù)據(jù)隱私權(quán)的保護(hù)、信息準(zhǔn)確性的保障、以及程序公正的實(shí)現(xiàn)等方面。Wewillfirstdefinetheconceptandcharacteristicsofpersonalinformationbigdata,andexplainitscurrentapplicationstatusincriminaljustice.Subsequently,wewillanalyzethebasicprinciplesandrequirementsofcriminaldueprocesstorevealpotentialconflictpointsbetweenpersonalinformationbigdataandcriminaldueprocessindatacollection,processing,utilization,andotheraspects.Theseconflictsincludebutarenotlimitedtoprotectingdataprivacyrights,ensuringinformationaccuracy,andachievingprogramfairness.接下來(lái)，我們將從法律、技術(shù)、倫理等多個(gè)角度探討沖突產(chǎn)生的根源，包括立法滯后、技術(shù)失控、道德失范等因素。在此基礎(chǔ)上，我們將進(jìn)一步分析這些沖突對(duì)刑事司法公正、效率以及人權(quán)保障等方面可能帶來(lái)的負(fù)面影響。Next,wewillexploretherootcausesofconflictsfrommultipleperspectivessuchaslaw,technology,andethics,includingfactorssuchaslegislativelag,technologicallossofcontrol,andmoralmisconduct.Onthisbasis,wewillfurtheranalyzethepotentialnegativeimpactsoftheseconflictsoncriminaljusticefairness,efficiency,andhumanrightsprotection.我們將提出一系列調(diào)和這一沖突的策略和建議。這些建議包括但不限于完善相關(guān)法律法規(guī)、加強(qiáng)技術(shù)監(jiān)管和倫理規(guī)范、提升司法人員的專(zhuān)業(yè)素養(yǎng)和倫理意識(shí)等方面。通過(guò)這些措施的實(shí)施，我們期望能夠在保障個(gè)人信息大數(shù)據(jù)有效利用的實(shí)現(xiàn)刑事正當(dāng)程序的公正和效率。Wewillproposeaseriesofstrategiesandsuggestionstoreconcilethisconflict.Thesesuggestionsincludebutarenotlimitedtoimprovingrelevantlawsandregulations,strengtheningtechnicalsupervisionandethicalnorms,andenhancingtheprofessionalcompetenceandethicalawarenessofjudicialpersonnel.Throughtheimplementationofthesemeasures,wehopetoachievefairnessandefficiencyincriminaldueprocesswhileensuringtheeffectiveutilizationofpersonalinformationbigdata.二、個(gè)人信息大數(shù)據(jù)的特點(diǎn)與風(fēng)險(xiǎn)Thecharacteristicsandrisksofpersonalinformationbigdata個(gè)人信息大數(shù)據(jù)，指的是以電子形式存在的，關(guān)于個(gè)人生活、工作、消費(fèi)等各個(gè)方面的海量數(shù)據(jù)集合。這些數(shù)據(jù)不僅種類(lèi)繁多，而且規(guī)模龐大，處理速度極快，價(jià)值密度卻相對(duì)較低。在大數(shù)據(jù)技術(shù)的推動(dòng)下，個(gè)人信息大數(shù)據(jù)呈現(xiàn)出以下幾個(gè)顯著特點(diǎn)：Personalinformationbigdatareferstoamassivecollectionofelectronicdatarelatedtovariousaspectsofpersonallife,work,consumption,etc.Thesedatanotonlyhaveawidevarietyoftypes,butalsohavealargescale,extremelyfastprocessingspeed,andrelativelylowvaluedensity.Drivenbybigdatatechnology,personalinformationbigdatapresentsthefollowingsignificantcharacteristics:數(shù)據(jù)規(guī)模龐大：隨著互聯(lián)網(wǎng)的普及和智能設(shè)備的廣泛應(yīng)用，個(gè)人信息數(shù)據(jù)量呈現(xiàn)爆炸式增長(zhǎng)，規(guī)模前所未有。Largescaleofdata:WiththepopularizationoftheInternetandthewideapplicationofintelligentdevices,theamountofpersonalinformationdataisgrowingexplosively,andthescaleisunprecedented.數(shù)據(jù)種類(lèi)繁多：個(gè)人信息不僅包括傳統(tǒng)的姓名、年齡、住址等基本信息，還擴(kuò)展到了網(wǎng)絡(luò)行為、位置軌跡、消費(fèi)習(xí)慣等多元化數(shù)據(jù)。Therearevarioustypesofdata:personalinformationnotonlyincludesbasicinformationsuchastraditionalnames,ages,andaddresses,butalsoextendstodiversifieddatasuchasonlinebehavior,locationtrajectories,andconsumptionhabits.數(shù)據(jù)處理高效：大數(shù)據(jù)技術(shù)使得對(duì)個(gè)人信息的收集、存儲(chǔ)、分析和利用更加高效，但也帶來(lái)了數(shù)據(jù)泄露和濫用的風(fēng)險(xiǎn)。Efficientdataprocessing:Bigdatatechnologymakesthecollection,storage,analysis,andutilizationofpersonalinformationmoreefficient,butitalsobringsrisksofdataleakageandabuse.隱私泄露風(fēng)險(xiǎn)：由于數(shù)據(jù)規(guī)模龐大和種類(lèi)繁多，個(gè)人信息泄露的可能性大大增加。一旦泄露，個(gè)人隱私將暴露無(wú)遺，不僅個(gè)人權(quán)益受損，還可能遭受網(wǎng)絡(luò)詐騙等不法侵害。Privacyleakagerisk:Duetothelargescaleandvarietyofdata,thepossibilityofpersonalinformationleakageisgreatlyincreased.Onceleaked,personalprivacywillbeexposedtothefullest,notonlydamagingpersonalrights,butalsopotentiallysufferingfromillegalinfringementsuchasonlinefraud.濫用風(fēng)險(xiǎn)：高效的數(shù)據(jù)處理能力使得個(gè)人信息可能被濫用于商業(yè)營(yíng)銷(xiāo)、政治操控等不正當(dāng)目的，甚至可能淪為犯罪活動(dòng)的工具。Abuserisk:Efficientdataprocessingcapabilitiesmayleadtopersonalinformationbeingmisusedforimproperpurposessuchascommercialmarketingandpoliticalmanipulation,andmayevenbecomeatoolforcriminalactivities.犯罪風(fēng)險(xiǎn)：個(gè)人信息大數(shù)據(jù)的易獲取性使得犯罪分子能夠輕易獲取并利用他人的個(gè)人信息實(shí)施詐騙、盜竊等犯罪活動(dòng)，給社會(huì)帶來(lái)極大的安全隱患。Criminalrisk:Theaccessibilityofpersonalinformationbigdataenablescriminalstoeasilyaccessandusethepersonalinformationofotherstocommitcriminalactivitiessuchasfraudandtheft,posinggreatsecurityriskstosociety.因此，在刑事正當(dāng)程序的框架內(nèi)，如何平衡個(gè)人信息大數(shù)據(jù)的利用與保護(hù)，確保個(gè)人信息不被濫用和泄露，成為了一個(gè)亟待解決的問(wèn)題。這需要在立法、司法和執(zhí)法等多個(gè)層面進(jìn)行深入研究和實(shí)踐探索，以構(gòu)建完善的個(gè)人信息保護(hù)體系。Therefore,withintheframeworkofcriminaldueprocess,howtobalancetheutilizationandprotectionofpersonalinformationbigdata,andensurethatpersonalinformationisnotabusedorleaked,hasbecomeanurgentproblemtobesolved.Thisrequiresin-depthresearchandpracticalexplorationatmultiplelevels,includinglegislation,judiciary,andlawenforcement,inordertobuildasoundpersonalinformationprotectionsystem.三、刑事正當(dāng)程序與個(gè)人信息保護(hù)的沖突TheConflictbetweenCriminalDueProcessandPersonalInformationProtection在大數(shù)據(jù)的時(shí)代背景下，刑事正當(dāng)程序與個(gè)人信息保護(hù)之間的沖突愈發(fā)顯現(xiàn)。這種沖突主要體現(xiàn)在以下幾個(gè)方面：Intheeraofbigdata,theconflictbetweencriminaldueprocessandpersonalinformationprotectionisbecomingincreasinglyapparent.Thisconflictismainlyreflectedinthefollowingaspects:第一，信息獲取與隱私權(quán)保護(hù)的沖突。在刑事偵查過(guò)程中，為了追查犯罪嫌疑人、收集證據(jù)，偵查機(jī)關(guān)往往需要獲取大量的個(gè)人信息。然而，這些信息的獲取往往涉及到個(gè)人的隱私權(quán)。如何在保障刑事偵查順利進(jìn)行的同時(shí)，又不侵犯?jìng)€(gè)人的隱私權(quán)，成為了一個(gè)亟待解決的問(wèn)題。Firstly,thereisaconflictbetweeninformationacquisitionandprivacyprotection.Intheprocessofcriminalinvestigation,inordertotracethesuspectandcollectevidence,theinvestigationorganoftenneedstoobtainalargeamountofpersonalinformation.However,theacquisitionofthisinformationofteninvolvesindividualprivacyrights.Howtoensurethesmoothprogressofcriminalinvestigationwithoutinfringingonpersonalprivacyrightshasbecomeanurgentproblemtobesolved.第二，信息分析與個(gè)人自由權(quán)的沖突。大數(shù)據(jù)技術(shù)的應(yīng)用使得個(gè)人信息可以被深度挖掘和分析，從而揭示出個(gè)人的行為模式、生活習(xí)慣等敏感信息。這種信息分析的結(jié)果可能會(huì)被用于刑事偵查中，從而限制個(gè)人的自由權(quán)。如何在利用大數(shù)據(jù)進(jìn)行刑事偵查的同時(shí)，保護(hù)個(gè)人的自由權(quán)，是另一個(gè)需要關(guān)注的問(wèn)題。Secondly,theconflictbetweeninformationanalysisandindividualfreedomrights.Theapplicationofbigdatatechnologyenablespersonalinformationtobedeeplyminedandanalyzed,therebyrevealingsensitiveinformationsuchasindividualbehaviorpatternsandlifestylehabits.Theresultsofthisinformationanalysismaybeusedincriminalinvestigations,therebylimitingindividualfreedom.Howtoprotectindividualfreedomwhileutilizingbigdataforcriminalinvestigationisanotherissuethatneedsattention.第三，信息存儲(chǔ)與信息安全權(quán)的沖突。隨著個(gè)人信息的大量存儲(chǔ)，信息泄露、被濫用等風(fēng)險(xiǎn)也隨之增加。如何在保障刑事正當(dāng)程序的確保個(gè)人信息的安全，防止信息被非法獲取和利用，是刑事正當(dāng)程序與個(gè)人信息保護(hù)沖突的另一個(gè)重要方面。Thirdly,thereisaconflictbetweeninformationstorageandinformationsecurityrights.Withthemassivestorageofpersonalinformation,therisksofinformationleakageandabusealsoincrease.Howtoensurethesecurityofpersonalinformationandpreventillegalacquisitionandutilizationofinformationwhileensuringcriminaldueprocessisanotherimportantaspectoftheconflictbetweencriminaldueprocessandpersonalinformationprotection.為了解決這些沖突，需要我們?cè)谛淌抡?dāng)程序與個(gè)人信息保護(hù)之間尋找一個(gè)平衡點(diǎn)。這既需要我們?cè)诹⒎ㄉ厦鞔_個(gè)人信息保護(hù)的原則和規(guī)則，也需要我們?cè)谒痉▽?shí)踐中不斷探索和完善相關(guān)的制度和機(jī)制。只有這樣，我們才能在保障刑事正當(dāng)程序的有效地保護(hù)個(gè)人信息的安全和隱私。Toresolvetheseconflicts,weneedtofindabalancebetweencriminaldueprocessandpersonalinformationprotection.Thisrequiresustoclarifytheprinciplesandrulesofpersonalinformationprotectioninlegislation,aswellascontinuouslyexploreandimproverelevantsystemsandmechanismsinjudicialpractice.Onlyinthiswaycanweeffectivelyprotectthesecurityandprivacyofpersonalinformationwhileensuringcriminaldueprocess.四、國(guó)內(nèi)外法律規(guī)制與實(shí)踐LegalRegulationandPracticeatHomeandAbroad在個(gè)人信息大數(shù)據(jù)與刑事正當(dāng)程序的沖突問(wèn)題上，國(guó)內(nèi)外都已有一定的法律規(guī)制和實(shí)踐經(jīng)驗(yàn)。Thereisalreadysomelegalregulationandpracticalexperiencebothdomesticallyandinternationallyontheconflictbetweenpersonalinformationbigdataandcriminaldueprocess.在中國(guó)，隨著信息技術(shù)的快速發(fā)展，個(gè)人信息保護(hù)逐漸受到重視。近年來(lái)，中國(guó)相繼出臺(tái)了《網(wǎng)絡(luò)安全法》《數(shù)據(jù)安全法》等法律法規(guī)，對(duì)個(gè)人信息的收集、使用、存儲(chǔ)、處理等方面進(jìn)行了規(guī)定，以保障個(gè)人信息的安全。在刑事正當(dāng)程序方面，中國(guó)刑事訴訟法明確規(guī)定了偵查、起訴、審判等程序中的正當(dāng)程序原則，保障犯罪嫌疑人和被告人的合法權(quán)益。然而，在個(gè)人信息大數(shù)據(jù)的背景下，如何平衡個(gè)人信息保護(hù)與刑事正當(dāng)程序的需求，仍是一個(gè)亟待解決的問(wèn)題。InChina,withtherapiddevelopmentofinformationtechnology,personalinformationprotectionisgraduallyreceivingattention.Inrecentyears,ChinahassuccessivelyintroducedlawsandregulationssuchastheCybersecurityLawandtheDataSecurityLaw,whichregulatethecollection,use,storage,andprocessingofpersonalinformationtoensurethesecurityofpersonalinformation.Intermsofcriminaldueprocess,China'sCriminalProcedureLawclearlystipulatestheprinciplesofdueprocessininvestigation,prosecution,trialandotherprocedurestoprotectthelegitimaterightsandinterestsofsuspectanddefendants.However,inthecontextofpersonalinformationbigdata,howtobalancetheneedsofpersonalinformationprotectionandcriminaldueprocessisstillanurgentproblemthatneedstobesolved.在國(guó)外，許多國(guó)家和地區(qū)也對(duì)個(gè)人信息保護(hù)和刑事正當(dāng)程序進(jìn)行了立法和實(shí)踐。例如，歐盟出臺(tái)了《通用數(shù)據(jù)保護(hù)條例》（GDPR），對(duì)個(gè)人信息的保護(hù)提出了更嚴(yán)格的要求。在刑事正當(dāng)程序方面，許多國(guó)家的刑事訴訟法都明確規(guī)定了偵查、起訴、審判等程序中的正當(dāng)程序原則，以保障犯罪嫌疑人和被告人的合法權(quán)益。同時(shí)，一些國(guó)家還通過(guò)設(shè)立專(zhuān)門(mén)的數(shù)據(jù)保護(hù)機(jī)構(gòu)、加強(qiáng)數(shù)據(jù)監(jiān)管等方式，來(lái)保障個(gè)人信息的安全。Manycountriesandregionsabroadhavealsolegislatedandpracticedpersonalinformationprotectionandcriminaldueprocess.Forexample,theEuropeanUnionhasintroducedtheGeneralDataProtectionRegulation(GDPR),whichimposesstricterrequirementsontheprotectionofpersonalinformation.Intermsofcriminaldueprocess,thecriminalprocedurelawsofmanycountriesclearlystipulatetheprinciplesofdueprocessininvestigation,prosecution,trialandotherprocedurestoprotectthelegitimaterightsandinterestsofsuspectanddefendants.Atthesametime,somecountriesalsoestablishspecializeddataprotectionagenciesandstrengthendatasupervisiontoensurethesecurityofpersonalinformation.通過(guò)比較國(guó)內(nèi)外在個(gè)人信息大數(shù)據(jù)與刑事正當(dāng)程序沖突問(wèn)題上的法律規(guī)制和實(shí)踐經(jīng)驗(yàn)，我們可以發(fā)現(xiàn)，不同國(guó)家和地區(qū)在平衡個(gè)人信息保護(hù)與刑事正當(dāng)程序需求方面，有著各自的特點(diǎn)和優(yōu)勢(shì)。例如，一些國(guó)家通過(guò)設(shè)立專(zhuān)門(mén)的數(shù)據(jù)保護(hù)機(jī)構(gòu)、加強(qiáng)數(shù)據(jù)監(jiān)管等方式，來(lái)保障個(gè)人信息的安全；而另一些國(guó)家則更加注重在刑事訴訟法中明確正當(dāng)程序原則，以保障犯罪嫌疑人和被告人的合法權(quán)益。這些經(jīng)驗(yàn)和做法，可以為我們?cè)诮鉀Q個(gè)人信息大數(shù)據(jù)與刑事正當(dāng)程序沖突問(wèn)題時(shí)提供有益的啟示和借鑒。Bycomparingthelegalregulationsandpracticalexperienceontheconflictbetweenpersonalinformationbigdataandcriminaldueprocessathomeandabroad,wecanfindthatdifferentcountriesandregionshavetheirowncharacteristicsandadvantagesinbalancingpersonalinformationprotectionandcriminaldueprocessneeds.Forexample,somecountriesensurethesecurityofpersonalinformationbyestablishingspecializeddataprotectionagenciesandstrengtheningdatasupervision;Othercountriespaymoreattentiontoclarifyingtheprincipleofdueprocessinthecriminalprocedurelawtoprotectthelegitimaterightsandinterestsofsuspectanddefendants.Theseexperiencesandpracticescanprovideusefulinsightsandreferencesforustoaddresstheconflictbetweenpersonalinformationbigdataandcriminaldueprocess.個(gè)人信息大數(shù)據(jù)與刑事正當(dāng)程序的沖突是一個(gè)復(fù)雜而重要的問(wèn)題。通過(guò)比較國(guó)內(nèi)外在這個(gè)問(wèn)題上的法律規(guī)制和實(shí)踐經(jīng)驗(yàn)，我們可以更好地認(rèn)識(shí)和理解這個(gè)問(wèn)題，并尋求更加有效的解決方案。我們也應(yīng)該加強(qiáng)國(guó)際合作與交流，共同推動(dòng)個(gè)人信息保護(hù)和刑事正當(dāng)程序的發(fā)展與進(jìn)步。Theconflictbetweenpersonalinformationbigdataandcriminaldueprocessisacomplexandimportantissue.Bycomparingthelegalregulationsandpracticalexperienceonthisissuebothdomesticallyandinternationally,wecanbetterunderstandandcomprehendthisissue,andseekmoreeffectivesolutions.Weshouldalsostrengtheninternationalcooperationandexchanges,andjointlypromotethedevelopmentandprogressofpersonalinformationprotectionandcriminaldueprocess.五、調(diào)和個(gè)人信息大數(shù)據(jù)與刑事正當(dāng)程序的措施Measurestoreconcilepersonalinformationbigdatawithcriminaldueprocess隨著大數(shù)據(jù)時(shí)代的來(lái)臨，個(gè)人信息大數(shù)據(jù)與刑事正當(dāng)程序之間的沖突日益顯現(xiàn)。如何在保障刑事正當(dāng)程序的充分利用個(gè)人信息大數(shù)據(jù)進(jìn)行犯罪預(yù)防和偵查，成為了亟待解決的問(wèn)題。以下，我們將探討調(diào)和個(gè)人信息大數(shù)據(jù)與刑事正當(dāng)程序的措施。Withtheadventofthebigdataera,theconflictbetweenpersonalinformationbigdataandcriminaldueprocessisbecomingincreasinglyapparent.Howtofullyutilizepersonalinformationbigdataforcrimepreventionandinvestigationwhileensuringcriminaldueprocesshasbecomeanurgentproblemtobesolved.Below,wewillexploremeasurestoreconcilepersonalinformationbigdatawithcriminaldueprocess.制定和完善相關(guān)法律法規(guī)是調(diào)和個(gè)人信息大數(shù)據(jù)與刑事正當(dāng)程序沖突的基礎(chǔ)。應(yīng)明確規(guī)定個(gè)人信息大數(shù)據(jù)的收集、存儲(chǔ)、使用、傳播等各個(gè)環(huán)節(jié)的合法性和程序性要求，防止濫用和侵犯?jìng)€(gè)人隱私。同時(shí)，對(duì)于刑事偵查中利用個(gè)人信息大數(shù)據(jù)的行為，也應(yīng)設(shè)定明確的法律邊界和操作規(guī)范，確保其在合法、公正、必要的范圍內(nèi)進(jìn)行。Theformulationandimprovementofrelevantlawsandregulationsarethebasisforreconcilingtheconflictbetweenpersonalinformationbigdataandcriminaldueprocess.Thelegalityandproceduralrequirementsforthecollection,storage,use,anddisseminationofpersonalinformationbigdatashouldbeclearlydefinedtopreventabuseandinfringementofpersonalprivacy.Atthesametime,clearlegalboundariesandoperationalnormsshouldbeestablishedfortheuseofpersonalinformationbigdataincriminalinvestigationstoensurethatitiscarriedoutwithinalegal,fair,andnecessaryscope.建立嚴(yán)格的個(gè)人信息大數(shù)據(jù)監(jiān)管機(jī)制是調(diào)和沖突的關(guān)鍵。應(yīng)設(shè)立專(zhuān)門(mén)的監(jiān)管機(jī)構(gòu)，負(fù)責(zé)對(duì)個(gè)人信息大數(shù)據(jù)的收集、使用等行為進(jìn)行全程監(jiān)管，確保其在法律框架內(nèi)運(yùn)行。同時(shí)，對(duì)于違反法律法規(guī)的行為，應(yīng)依法予以嚴(yán)厲打擊，維護(hù)個(gè)人信息大數(shù)據(jù)的安全和合法使用。Establishingastrictregulatorymechanismforpersonalinformationbigdataisthekeytoreconcilingconflicts.Aspecializedregulatoryagencyshouldbeestablishedtooverseetheentireprocessofcollectingandusingpersonalinformationbigdata,ensuringitsoperationwithinthelegalframework.Atthesametime,forviolationsoflawsandregulations,strictcrackdownsshouldbeimposedinaccordancewiththelawtomaintainthesecurityandlegitimateuseofpersonalinformationandbigdata.再次，加強(qiáng)個(gè)人信息大數(shù)據(jù)保護(hù)技術(shù)的研發(fā)和應(yīng)用也是調(diào)和沖突的重要手段。應(yīng)加大對(duì)個(gè)人信息大數(shù)據(jù)保護(hù)技術(shù)的研發(fā)力度，提高數(shù)據(jù)的加密、脫敏、匿名等處理技術(shù)水平，防止數(shù)據(jù)泄露和被濫用。同時(shí)，在刑事偵查中，也應(yīng)積極探索利用脫敏、匿名等技術(shù)手段，在保護(hù)個(gè)人隱私的同時(shí)，提高偵查效率和準(zhǔn)確性。Onceagain,strengtheningtheresearchandapplicationofpersonalinformationbigdataprotectiontechnologyisalsoanimportantmeansofreconcilingconflicts.Effortsshouldbemadetoincreasetheresearchanddevelopmentofpersonalinformationbigdataprotectiontechnologies,improvethelevelofdataencryption,desensitization,anonymityandotherprocessingtechnologies,andpreventdataleakageandabuse.Atthesametime,incriminalinvestigation,itisalsonecessarytoactivelyexploretheuseofdesensitization,anonymityandothertechnicalmeanstoprotectpersonalprivacywhileimprovinginvestigationefficiencyandaccuracy.提高公眾的法律意識(shí)和隱私權(quán)保護(hù)意識(shí)也是調(diào)和沖突的重要途徑。應(yīng)通過(guò)宣傳教育、培訓(xùn)等方式，提高公眾對(duì)個(gè)人信息大數(shù)據(jù)和隱私權(quán)保護(hù)的認(rèn)識(shí)和重視程度，增強(qiáng)自我保護(hù)意識(shí)和能力。也應(yīng)鼓勵(lì)公眾積極參與個(gè)人信息大數(shù)據(jù)的監(jiān)管和保護(hù)工作，共同維護(hù)個(gè)人信息大數(shù)據(jù)的安全和合法使用。Raisingpublicawarenessofthelawandprivacyprotectionisalsoanimportantwaytoreconcileconflicts.Weshouldenhancethepublic'sawarenessandimportanceofpersonalinformationbigdataandprivacyprotectionthroughpublicity,education,training,andothermeans,andenhanceself-protectionawarenessandability.Thepublicshouldalsobeencouragedtoactivelyparticipateinthesupervisionandprotectionofpersonalinformationbigdata,andjointlymaintainthesecurityandlegitimateuseofpersonalinformationbigdata.調(diào)和個(gè)人信息大數(shù)據(jù)與刑事正當(dāng)程序的沖突需要從法律法規(guī)、監(jiān)管機(jī)制、技術(shù)保護(hù)、公眾意識(shí)等多個(gè)方面入手，形成全方位、多層次的保障措施。只有這樣，才能在保障刑事正當(dāng)程序的充分利用個(gè)人信息大數(shù)據(jù)進(jìn)行犯罪預(yù)防和偵查，實(shí)現(xiàn)個(gè)人信息大數(shù)據(jù)與刑事正當(dāng)程序的和諧共生。Toreconciletheconflictbetweenpersonalinformationbigdataandcriminaldueprocess,itisnecessarytostartfrommultipleaspectssuchaslawsandregulations,regulatorymechanisms,technicalprotection,andpublicawareness,andformcomprehensiveandmulti-levelsecuritymeasures.Onlyinthiswaycanwefullyutilizepersonalinformationbigdataforcrimepreventionandinvestigationwhileensuringcriminaldueprocess,andachieveharmoniouscoexistencebetweenpersonalinformationbigdataandcriminaldueprocess.六、結(jié)論Conclusion隨著信息技術(shù)的飛速發(fā)展和大數(shù)據(jù)時(shí)代的來(lái)臨，個(gè)人信息大數(shù)據(jù)與刑事正當(dāng)程序之間的沖突愈發(fā)顯現(xiàn)。一方面，大數(shù)據(jù)的廣泛應(yīng)用為刑事司法提供了前所未有的便利，如犯罪預(yù)測(cè)、證據(jù)收集等；另一方面，大數(shù)據(jù)的使用也可能侵犯公民的個(gè)人隱私權(quán)，對(duì)刑事正當(dāng)程序構(gòu)成挑戰(zhàn)。如何在保護(hù)個(gè)人隱私權(quán)與提高刑事司法效率之間尋求平衡，成為當(dāng)下亟待解決的問(wèn)題。Withtherapiddevelopmentofinformationtechnologyandtheadventofthebigdataera,theconflictbetweenpersonalinformationbigdataandcriminaldueprocessisbecomingincreasinglyapparent.Ontheonehand,thewidespreadapplicationofbigdatahasprovidedunprecedentedconvenienceforcriminaljustice,suchascrimeprediction,evidencecollection,etc;Ontheotherhand,theuseofbigdatamayalsoinfringeuponthepersonalprivacyrightsofcitizens,posingachallengetocriminaldueprocess.Howtofindabalancebetweenprotectingpersonalprivacyrightsandimprovingcriminaljusticeefficiencyhasbecomeanurgentissuetobesolved.面對(duì)這一沖突，我們需要重新審視刑事正當(dāng)程序的內(nèi)涵與要求，并在此基礎(chǔ)上構(gòu)建相應(yīng)的調(diào)和機(jī)制。應(yīng)明確個(gè)人信息大數(shù)據(jù)在刑事司法中的使用范圍與限制，確保其在合法、正當(dāng)?shù)那疤嵯逻M(jìn)行。加強(qiáng)對(duì)大數(shù)據(jù)技術(shù)的監(jiān)管與約束，防止其被濫用或誤用。同時(shí)，提升公民的法律意識(shí)和