版權(quán)說(shuō)明:本文檔由用戶(hù)提供并上傳,收益歸屬內(nèi)容提供方,若內(nèi)容存在侵權(quán),請(qǐng)進(jìn)行舉報(bào)或認(rèn)領(lǐng)
文檔簡(jiǎn)介
BloggingandthepublicsphereLifeOnlineBruceFerwerdaTommyvanderVorst31maart2021InthispresentationWhoarethosebloggers?Lenhart&Fox(2006):Aportraitoftheinternet’snewstorytellersWhatdobloggersdo?McKenna&Pole(2007):Whatdobloggersdo:anaveragedayonanaveragepoliticalblogThepowerofweblogsDrezner&Farell(2007):Blogs,politicsandpowerInteractionsamongbloggers:theblogosphereHargittai,Gallo&Kane(2007):Cross-ideologicaldiscussionsamongconservativeandliberalbloggers/InnovationSciencesPAGE14/5/2024Weblogs/InnovationSciencesPAGE24/5/2024Whoarethosebloggers?Let’sthrowinsomestatistics.../InnovationSciencesPAGE34/5/2024Whoarethosebloggers?BloggingisbringingnewvoicestotheonlineworldLenhart&FoxconductedasurveyintheUS:54%ofbloggershaveneverpublishedanywhereelse8%ofinternetusersmaintainsablog39%readblogsVarioustopics&motivesforbloggingHighpercentageofbloggersstop
afterawhile/InnovationSciencesPAGE44/5/2024Whoarethosebloggers?Thebloggingpopulation:Isyoung(54%is<30)ConsistsofasmanywomenasmenMostlyinurban/suburbanareas(13%inruralareas)Lesslikelytobewhitethanaverageinternetuser/InnovationSciencesPAGE54/5/2024Whoarethosebloggers?Blogscanbepersonalorbea‘publicendeavour’:55%ofbloggersuseapseudonymFor84%,bloggingisahobbyor“somethingIdo,butnotsomethingaspendalotoftimeon〞59%spendjustoneortwohoursperweekmaintainingtheirblog52%blogmostlyforthemselves,notforanaudience;32%blogmostlyfortheiraudience(Whyblog‘justforyourself’?)/InnovationSciencesPAGE64/5/2024Whoarethosebloggers?Bloggingvs.Journalism:34%considertheirblogaformofjournalism57%includelinkstooriginalsources‘often’/InnovationSciencesPAGE74/5/2024Whatdobloggersdo?McKenna&Pole(2007):exploratoryempiricalstudyHowdopoliticalbloggersusetheirblogsCategorizationofbloggingactivities:InformeractivitiesWatchdogactivities(“keepinganeyeonmainstreammedia〞)PoliticalactivitiesPhilantropicactivities/InnovationSciencesPAGE84/5/2024Whatdobloggersdo?Findingsaverageblogger≠averagecitizen
(DemographicsdifferfromLenhart&Fox:morewhites,moremales)Informeractivities/InnovationSciencesPAGE94/5/2024Whatdobloggersdo?FindingsWatchdogactivities80%ofbloggersnotifytheirreadersaboutbiasoromissionsinthemediaClosesecondtoinformingactivitiesBloggersdonottrustmainstreammediaButalsorelyonit!Bloggingas‘first-ratejournalism’incountrieswithoutfreepressorinthecaseofevents(i.e.HurricaneKatrina)/InnovationSciencesPAGE104/5/2024Whatdobloggersdo?FindingsPoliticalactivities:2/3ofbloggerswanttoengagepeopleTheywantyou:/InnovationSciencesPAGE114/5/2024Whatdobloggersdo?FindingsPoliticalactivities:2/3ofbloggerswanttoengagepeopleTheywantyou:/InnovationSciencesPAGE124/5/2024Whatdobloggersdo?FindingsPoliticalactivities:2/3ofbloggerswanttoengagepeopleTheywantyou:/InnovationSciencesPAGE134/5/2024Whatdobloggersdo?FindingsPhilantropicactivitiesAskingreaderstodonate(44%)(interestingly,thisislowerthanthe66%donatorsintheUS)Rarelypursuedactivity(i.e.notthe‘corebusiness’)/InnovationSciencesPAGE144/5/2024ThepowerofweblogsDrezner&Farell(2007)Introduction:Blogs,politicsandpower:aspecialissueofPublicChoiceAreblogsindeedimportanttopolitics?Dotheyhaveabeneficialorharmfuleffect?/nameofdepartmentPAGE154/5/2024ThepowerofweblogsDoblogsaffectpolitics?BlogscanbeimportantMoreimportantasreactorstothemediathanindependentagendasettersWhendoesblogshavepoliticalpower?Leasttrustedsourceofnews(BBC/Reuters/MediaCenter2006)/nameofdepartmentPAGE164/5/2024ThepowerofweblogsAreblogsgoodforpolitics?OngoingdiscussionCyberapartheid“...increasingpeople’sabilitytohearechoesoftheirownvoicesandtowallthemselvesofffromothers.〞(Sunstein2001,p.49)Linking&comments/nameofdepartmentPAGE174/5/2024InteractionsamongbloggersHargittai,Gallo&Kane(2007)Cross-ideologicaldiscussionsamongconservativeandliberalbloggersDopeopleabandonthereadingofdissentingpoliticalopinionsinfavorofmaterialthatiscloselyalignedwiththeirownideologicalposition?/nameofdepartmentPAGE184/5/2024InteractionsamongbloggersH1BlogsaremorelikelytolinktoblogsthatmatchtheirideologicalpersuasionH2Theamountofcross-ideologicallinkingamongblogswilledeclineovertimeHargittai,Gallo&Kane(2007)/nameofdepartmentPAGE194/5/2024InteractionsamongbloggersCross-ideologicallinkagesinthepoliticalblogosphereBlogrollconnections27%presentedinthewholenetwork91%resembleideologicalpositions9%differentviewpoints/nameofdepartmentPAGE204/5/2024InteractionsamongbloggersCross-ideologicallinkagesinthepoliticalblogosphereLinksinpostsMorelikelytolinktoideologicalblogs12%conservativeliberal16%liberalconservative/nameofdepartmentPAGE214/5/2024Interactionsam
溫馨提示
- 1. 本站所有資源如無(wú)特殊說(shuō)明,都需要本地電腦安裝OFFICE2007和PDF閱讀器。圖紙軟件為CAD,CAXA,PROE,UG,SolidWorks等.壓縮文件請(qǐng)下載最新的WinRAR軟件解壓。
- 2. 本站的文檔不包含任何第三方提供的附件圖紙等,如果需要附件,請(qǐng)聯(lián)系上傳者。文件的所有權(quán)益歸上傳用戶(hù)所有。
- 3. 本站RAR壓縮包中若帶圖紙,網(wǎng)頁(yè)內(nèi)容里面會(huì)有圖紙預(yù)覽,若沒(méi)有圖紙預(yù)覽就沒(méi)有圖紙。
- 4. 未經(jīng)權(quán)益所有人同意不得將文件中的內(nèi)容挪作商業(yè)或盈利用途。
- 5. 人人文庫(kù)網(wǎng)僅提供信息存儲(chǔ)空間,僅對(duì)用戶(hù)上傳內(nèi)容的表現(xiàn)方式做保護(hù)處理,對(duì)用戶(hù)上傳分享的文檔內(nèi)容本身不做任何修改或編輯,并不能對(duì)任何下載內(nèi)容負(fù)責(zé)。
- 6. 下載文件中如有侵權(quán)或不適當(dāng)內(nèi)容,請(qǐng)與我們聯(lián)系,我們立即糾正。
- 7. 本站不保證下載資源的準(zhǔn)確性、安全性和完整性, 同時(shí)也不承擔(dān)用戶(hù)因使用這些下載資源對(duì)自己和他人造成任何形式的傷害或損失。
最新文檔
- 智能家居產(chǎn)品買(mǎi)賣(mài)協(xié)議
- 手表代理合同
- 畜牧養(yǎng)殖合作協(xié)議模版
- 磚混砌筑工程協(xié)議范例
- 股票配資軟件授權(quán)合同
- 現(xiàn)場(chǎng)處置方案應(yīng)急救援預(yù)案演練方案
- 環(huán)保設(shè)備租賃服務(wù)合同
- 試樁工程施工合同書(shū)
- 工業(yè)設(shè)備租賃合同參考
- 創(chuàng)新費(fèi)買(mǎi)賣(mài)合同
- 創(chuàng)新實(shí)踐(理論)學(xué)習(xí)通超星期末考試答案章節(jié)答案2024年
- 二十屆三中全會(huì)知識(shí)點(diǎn)試題及答案【200題】
- 2023《中華人民共和國(guó)合同法》
- 鎮(zhèn)江市內(nèi)河航道網(wǎng)規(guī)劃
- 阻尼比的計(jì)算精品課件
- 物業(yè)保潔合同
- 2021年普通口譯服務(wù)合同范本word版.doc
- (完整word版)直接無(wú)捻粗紗拉絲機(jī)卷繞比的計(jì)算與選擇.doc
- 學(xué)校科學(xué)教育評(píng)價(jià)機(jī)制方案范文
- 新編日語(yǔ)第一冊(cè)(修訂版)單詞 word版
- 部編版四年級(jí)語(yǔ)文下冊(cè)文言文二則課件PPT模版
評(píng)論
0/150
提交評(píng)論