data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/1110f/1110f9d8dc52dad9bdda033eaa03252e186c6682" alt="能源安全與綠色轉(zhuǎn)型Energy Security and The Green Transition 2024_第1頁"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/20e40/20e4067ae866f8d8a2b43a4c5ebc78fe22450fa3" alt="能源安全與綠色轉(zhuǎn)型Energy Security and The Green Transition 2024_第2頁"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/61632/616325f810b5dc811dd404f1cba832c4b332b28b" alt="能源安全與綠色轉(zhuǎn)型Energy Security and The Green Transition 2024_第3頁"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bb21c/bb21c97f4bd890da73099da800faf223b0ef1049" alt="能源安全與綠色轉(zhuǎn)型Energy Security and The Green Transition 2024_第4頁"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/94a83/94a8356d238ce37b46d15369408868594329d73c" alt="能源安全與綠色轉(zhuǎn)型Energy Security and The Green Transition 2024_第5頁"
版權(quán)說明:本文檔由用戶提供并上傳,收益歸屬內(nèi)容提供方,若內(nèi)容存在侵權(quán),請進(jìn)行舉報或認(rèn)領(lǐng)
文檔簡介
`
EnergySecurityandTheGreenTransition
JadenKim,AugustusJ.Panton,andGregorSchwerhoff
WP/24/6
IMFWorkingPapersdescriberesearchin
progressbytheauthor(s)andarepublishedto
elicitcommentsandtoencouragedebate.
TheviewsexpressedinIMFWorkingPapersare
thoseoftheauthor(s)anddonotnecessarily
representtheviewsoftheIMF,itsExecutiveBoard,
orIMFmanagement.
2024
JAN
NAr
AR
*TheauthorswouldliketothankFlorenceJaumotteforhelpfulcomments,andSnehaThubeandHugoRojas-Romagosaformodelsimulations.
?2024InternationalMonetaryFund
WP/24/6
IMFWorkingPaper
ResearchDepartment
EnergySecurityandTheGreenTransition
PreparedbyJadenKim,AugustusJ.PantonandGregorSchwerhoff*
AuthorizedfordistributionbyFlorenceJaumotte
January2024
IMFWorkingPapersdescriberesearchinprogressbytheauthor(s)andarepublishedtoelicit
commentsandtoencouragedebate.TheviewsexpressedinIMFWorkingPapersarethoseofthe
author(s)anddonotnecessarilyrepresenttheviewsoftheIMF,itsExecutiveBoard,orIMFmanagement.
ABSTRACT:Thecurrentenergycrisishasraisedimportantpolicyquestionsonhowtostrengthenshort-termenergysecuritywhileremainingfirmlycommittedtothegreentransition,achallengeamplifiedbytherecent
consensusatCOP28totransitionawayfromfossilfuels.Thispaperexaminesthehistoricaldeterminantsofthesecurityofenergysupplyandanalyzesthegreentransitionimplicationsforenergysecurity.Lookingback,wefindthatthediversificationofenergytradepartners,orthelackthereof,wasthemainfactorthat
underpinnedenergysecuritydynamicswithinandacrosscountriesoverthelasttwodecades.Lookingahead,thegreentransitionisexpectedtohaveanetpositiveeffectonenergysecurityprovidedinvestmentsare
alignedtoaddressnewchallengesposedbytheincreasedrelianceonrenewables.
JELClassificationNumbers:
Q43,Q47,Q48,Q54,Q55,Q58,H20
Keywords:
Energysecurity;energyindependence;greentransition;climatemitigation;geo-politicalrisks
Authors’E-MailAddress:
jkim6@;
apanton@;
gschwerhoff@;
IMFWORKINGPAPERS
EnergySecurityandTheGreenTransition
3
WORKINGPAPERS
EnergySecurityandTheGreen
Transition
PreparedbyJadenKim,AugustusJ.Panton*andGregorSchwerhoff
*Correspondingauthor:AugustusJ.Panton,InternationalMonetaryFund,70019th,St.NW,Washington,DC,20431,USA.Email:
apanton@
IMFWORKINGPAPERS
EnergySecurityandTheGreenTransition
4
Contents
Introduction
5
Trendsinenergysecurity
6
Whatisenergysecurity?
6
Historicaltrendsindiversificationandpoliticalriskindicators
6
Measurementofenergysecurity
11
Energysecurityatthegloballevel
11
Trendsincountry-specificenergysecurity
13
Energysecuritymeasuresandrecentmacroeconomicdevelopments
16
Thenetzerotransition:Outofexistingchallenges?
17
Impactofclimatepoliciesonenergysecurity:Channels
17
Impactofclimatepoliciesonenergysecurity:amodel-basedexperiment
18
Thenetzerotransition:Intonewchallenges?
21
Thesupplyof“transitionmetals”
21
Electricitysupply
24
Conclusion
26
References
28
Annex1:Thedecompositionofchangesinenergysecurity
32
Annex2.Decompositionofenergysecurityriskindexwithdifferentpoliticalriskindicators
33
Box
1.WhatisEnergySecurity?Areviewoftherelevantliterature
8
Figures
1:Compositionoffossilfuelproductionbyfuelandcountry
7
2:Politicalriskscoresamongmajorfossilfuelproducers
9
3:Politicalriskandchangeinproductioninfossilfuels
10
4:Energyproductionbypoliticalfreedom
11
5:Decompositionofglobalenergysecurityriskindexforproductionsofindividualfuels
13
6:EnergysecurityasmeasuredbyICRGpolitical-risksweightedcountrydiversificationindices
14
7:EnergyIntensityasamagnifierofenergysecurityrisks
14
8DecompositionofICRG-politicalriskadjustedindex,2010-2020
16
9:RisksfromRelianceonRussianEnergy
17
10:Renewableenergyuseandfossilfuelimports
18
11:GlobalenergysecurityinthebaselineandInternationalCarbonPriceFloor(ICPF)scenarios
19
12:Globalelectricitygeneration(barcharts)andfossilfuelproduction(blackline)
20
14:Theshareoftheproductionoftopthreeproducerstoglobaltotal,2021
22
15Supplysecurityindexforcopperandnickelovertime
23
5
Introduction
TheongoingenergycrisisamidRussia’sinvasionofUkrainehasexposedthelongstanding
vulnerabilitiesfromfossil-fuelrelianceandrekindlednationalenergysecurityconcerns.Accordingto
theInternationalEnergyAgency(IEA,2023),energysecurityistheuninterruptedavailabilityofenergysourcesatanaffordableprice.Despitetheimportanceofotherdimensionsofenergysecurity,especiallyaffordability
amidgrowingconcernsaboutenergypoverty,thefocusinthispaperisontheuninterruptedavailabilityof
energysupply.Insuchcontext,weexaminekeydriversofenergysecurity—diversificationofsupplyandpoliticalriskofsuppliers—tounderstandthehistoricalevolutionofenergysecurityanddifferencesacrosscountries.Wealsoexaminehowthegreentransition—towhichmanycountrieshavecommittedand
reconfirmedatCOP28—couldimpactenergysecuritygoingforward,consideringbothreducedrelianceonfossilfuelsandnewchallengesfromrenewableenergysources.
Tothisend,weproceedinthreesteps.First,lookingback,weanalyzehowthediversificationofenergy
tradepartnersandthepoliticalrisksofthosepartners,thetwomaindeterminantsofenergysecurity,
contributedtochangingenergysecuritydynamicsoverthelasttwodecades.UsingtheHerfindahl-HirschmanIndex(HHI)adjustedforthepoliticalrisksanddiversificationoftradepartners,weanalyzeenergysecurityof
coal,oil,andnaturalgasfortheperiod2000to2020bothattheglobalandtheindividualcountrylevels.We
accountforpoliticalrisksfromtwoperspectives:risksofsupplydisruptionduetopoliticalreasonsinenergy-
exportingeconomiesversusrisksstemmingfromweakpoliticalalignment(measuredasgeo-politicaldistance)betweenenergy-exportingandimportingeconomies.Second,takingaforward-lookingperspective,weemployamodel-basedexperimenttoanalyzehowthegreentransition—underpinnedbyagloballycoordinatedcarbon
pricefloorarrangement—canbeexpectedtoaffectenergysecurityglobally.Finally,wediscussnewchallengestoenergysecuritythatcouldarisefromtheuseofrenewables.
Thispapercontributestotheenergysecurityliteratureintwoways.Onthehistoricalfront,we
decomposeenergysecurityrisksintotwomaindeterminants:adiversificationeffectthatshowshowchangingconcentrationofenergyimportsourcesaffectedenergysecurityandariskeffectthatquantifiestheimpactofpoliticalrisksonenergysecurity.Fromthisdecomposition,wethenquantifythecontributionofeachofthetwoeffectsonenergysecuritybothattheglobalandnationallevels.Asecondcontributionisacomprehensive
analysisofenergysecurityunderthegreentransition.Specifically,weprovidemodel-basedevidenceonhowclimatepolicycanbeexpectedtoweakenenergysecurityforindividualfossilfuelsbutstrengthenenergy
independenceandsecurityontheaggregatethroughmoredomesticenergyproduction.
Threecoreresultsareworthhighlighting.First,wefindthatdiversificationoftradepartners,orthelackthereof,wasthemainfactorthatunderpinnedglobalenergysecurityoverthelastdecade,althoughto
differentdegreesforindividualfossilfuels.Thiswasparticularlythecaseforcoalandoilwhosesupplywaslargelyconcentratedamongstafewlargeproducers.Increasingpoliticalrisksandreduceddiversification
equallycontributedtotherelativelymodestdeteriorationexperiencedinthesecurityofnaturalgassupply.
Acrossallfuels,concentrationofenergytradeamonggeopoliticallyalignedeconomieswouldweakendiversificationandheightenenergyinsecurity.
Second,ourmodel-basedevidencesuggeststhatthegreentransitionisexpectedtohaveanet
positiveeffectonenergysecuritybyreducingfossilfueldependence.Ontheonehand,climatemitigationpolicieswillreducefossilfueldemand,forcinghigh-costfossil-fuelproducerstoexittheenergymarket.The
resultingincreaseinmarketconcentrationwouldweakenenergysecurity.Butontheotherhand,increased
renewableenergypenetrationamidclimatepolicywillreduceenergyimportdependenceandimproveenergy
6
security.Renewableenergydoesnotrequireongoingfuelimportsorproduction,asenergygenerationwithfossilfuelsdoes.Thismeansthatcurrentfuelimporterscansteadilyreducetheshareoffuelstheyimport,aprocessthatresultsfromboththeexpansionofrenewableenergyinelectricityproductionandelectrification(i.e.,theextensionofelectricitytoadditionaluses).Onnet,thelatterchannelisexpectedtodominate.
Finally,thegreentransitionbringsnewchallengestoenergysecuritywhichwillrequireinvestmentsininfrastructurecompatiblewiththerenewableenergyandelectricmobilityera.Ascountriesexpandtheirrenewableenergyproductioncapacities,newriskstoenergysecuritywouldemerge,includingpotentialimportdependencyfortransitionmetals.Strengtheningenergysecurityintherenewableenergyerawillthusrequireastrategicsupportofproductioncapacitiesinavarietyofcountriestofacilitateimportdiversification.
Furthermore,theintermittencyofrenewableenergy,likesolarandwindpower,posesachallengefor
uninterruptedenergysupply.Awiderangeofsolutionsforthischallengeexists,includingenergystorageand
gridextensions.Thesesolutionsrequireinvestmentsininfrastructureaswell.Giventhatthehigherupfront
costsofrenewableenergyarecompensatedbylowoperatingcost,energysystemswithrenewableenergyandsupportinginfrastructureareestimatedtohaveasimilarcostasenergysystemsbuiltonfossilfuels.
Therestofthepaperisorganizedasfollows.Thenextsectionpresentsglobalaggregatetrendsinenergysecuritywhilesection3focusesoncountry-specifictrendsandtheirmaindrivers.Thefourthsectionemploysaglobalcomputablegeneralequilibrium(CGE)modeltoexaminetheimpactofclimatemitigationpolicieson
energysecurity.Insection5,newchallengesamidthegreentransition,includingincreaseddependenceongreenmetalimportsandintermittentenergysupply,arediscussed.Section6sumsupthepaper.
Trendsinenergysecurity
Thegoalinthissectionistwofold.First,wedefineenergysecurity.Second,wepresentstylizedfactsonthehistoricalglobaltrendsofitsdrivers,namelychangingenergysupplydiversificationontheonehandandthepoliticalrisksofsuppliersontheother.
Whatisenergysecurity?
Energysecurityisdeterminedbyhowdiversifiedandpoliticallysecureacountry’senergysourcesare.
Forourpurpose,energysecurityisdefinedasthesecurityofsupply.Thatis,thatallelseequal,thereishighenergysecurityifthereisadiversifiedportfolioofsuppliers(Cohen,Joutz,andLoungani2011)withlow
politicalrisks(LeCoqandPaltseva2009).Box1presentsasummaryoftherelevantliteraturewithseveralotherdimensionsthatunderpinenergysecurity.
Historicaltrendsindiversificationandpoliticalriskindicators
Coalandoilproductionshavebecomemoreconcentratedoverthelasttwodecades.Figure1showstheevolutionofglobalproductionsharesoftopsuppliersinthevariousfossilfuels.Together,thelargestcoal
producershavecapturedanincreasingshareoftheglobalcoalmarket,drivenbyrisingsharesofChinaand,to
alesserextent,Indonesia(from33%ofglobalproductionin2000to60%in2020).Foroil,thereisalsoa
noticeableshifttowardmoreconcentratedoutputmarketsduringthelastdecade,withtheUnitedStates,
CanadaandIraqgainingmarketshares.Butwhilethejointmarketshareofthetop7producersincreased,itstayedbelow60percent.Incontrast,theglobalnaturalgasmarketdidnotexperienceanymaterialchangeinconcentrationoverthelasttwodecades,despitesomemodestshiftsinmarketsharesforafewnaturalgas
IMFWORKINGPAPERS
EnergySecurityandTheGreenTransition
7
producers(e.g.,Qatar,Iran,andChina)matchedbysomedecreasesinRussia’sandCanada’sshares.Thepictureremainslargelythesamewithrespecttoglobalexportshares.
Figure1:Compositionoffossilfuelproductionbyfuelandcountry
(Percentofglobalproduction)
CoalproductionOilproductionNaturalgasproduction
100
80
60
40
20
0
china
Unitedstates
ndonesia
Austraia
ndia
RussianFederation
southAfrica
other
100
80
60
40
20
0
20002005201020152020
UnitedstatesRussianFederationsaudiArabia
raq
UAE
other
canada
china
100
80
60
40
20
0
2000200520102015
Unitedstates
RussianFederation
ran
canada
Qatar
china
Austraia
other
20002005201020152020
Source:InternationalEnergyAgency,WorldEnergyBalances;andIMFstaffcalculations.
Note:Productioncomprisestheproductionofprimaryenergy.
Indicatorsofpoliticalrisksanddemocraticfreedomhaveworsenedinmostfossilfuelproducing
economiesduringthelastdecade.Followingtheliterature,weemploytheDemocracyIndexcompiledbytheEconomistIntelligenceUnitasproxyfordemocraticfreedomandtwoseparateindicatorsforpoliticalrisks:(i)
theInternationalCountryRiskGuide(ICRG)indexofthePoliticalRiskServicesGroup(PRSG)and(ii)the
IdealPointDistance(IDP)measureconstructedbyBailey,Strezhnev,andVoeten(2017).Theycomplement
eachotherbyhighlightingdifferentaspectsofrisk.TheDemocracyIndexisbasedonelectoralprocessand
pluralism,civilliberties,functioningofgovernment,politicalparticipationandpoliticalculture(EIU2022).Among
thelargestcomponentsoftheICRGindexaregovernmentstability,socioeconomicconditions,aswellasinternalandexternalconflict(PRS2018).Politicalrisksappeartohaveincreasedforcoalandnaturalgas,whilethepictureismoremixedforoilproducers.
IMFWORKINGPAPERS
EnergySecurityandTheGreenTransition
8
Box1.WhatisEnergySecurity?Areviewoftherelevantliterature
Energysecurityisabroadconceptthatisdifficulttodefine.Guaranteeingenergysecurityremainsatthe
heartofnationalsecurityandenergypoliciesinmanyeconomies.Yet,whatconstitutesenergysecurity
remainsamatterofdebateintheliterature(Chester,2010).AccordingtoWillrich(1976)andLuftandKorin
(2009),energysecuritycanbedefinedfromtwopolarangles:forenergyexportingandimportingeconomies.Fromthestandpointofenergyexporters,itisthesecurityofdemand—guaranteedaccesstodiverseforeign
markets—thatmatters.Fromthestandpointofenergyimportingeconomies,thereliabilityofenergysupplyisparamount.TheInternationalEnergyAgency(IEA)definesenergysecurityastheuninterruptedavailabilityofenergysourcesatanaffordableprice(IEA2014).Apartfromthesecurityofdemandversussupplydichotomy,energysecurityisusuallydefinedalongseveralotherdimensions,includingthesustainabilityofsupply(BlumandLegey,2012).
Securityofsupplyisthedominantthemeintheenergysecurityliterature.Theuninterruptedavailabilityandaffordabilityofenergysupplyiscontingentuponseveralfactors,notablythediversityandthepolitical
risksofsupplysources(LeCoqandPaltseva2009).Borrowedfromportfoliotheoryinfinance,theconceptofenergysupplydiversityimpliesthatallelseequal,thereishighenergysecurityifthereisadiversifiedportfolioofsuppliers(Gupta2008;Cohen,Joutz,andLoungani2011;M?nsson,Johansson,andNilsson2014).For
fuelslikenaturalgas,diversificationgoesbeyondcountryofsupplyorigin.Therouteoftransport—pipelineorseaborneshipment—alsomatters.Whilethereismoreconcentratedsupplywheninfrastructuralconstraintslimitnaturalgasimportsviapipeline,liquefiednaturalgas(LNG)canstrengthenenergysecurityby
broadeningsupplysources(Vivoda2019).SuchstrategicimportanceofLNGhasunderpinnedtheincreasingroleofLNGintheenergysecuritydebate,withcontractsfordeliveringLNGbecomingmoreflexibleandan
increasingshareofLNGtradedinspottradingtransactionsinsteadoflong-termcontracts(IEA2019).
Renewableenergyisgainingincreasingimportanceintheanalysisofenergysecurity.Renewablesare
replacingenergyimports(G?kg?zandGüvercin2018).Atthesametime,renewablesarecreatingnew
challengesforenergysecurity.Renewablescandecreaseelectricitypricevolatilityinsomecountries,but
increaseitinothers(Ketterer2014;Rintam?ki,Siddiqui,andSalo2017).Asenergysecurityalsodependsonaffordability,pricevolatilityisaconcernforenergysecurity.However,thereareexamplesforhowprice
volatilitycanbehandledincountrieswithahighshareofrenewables.Germanyhasalreadytakenregulatoryandpolicymeasurestoreducepricevolatilitycausedbyrenewableenergyandtheseareshowingsuccess(Ketterer2014).Azzunietal.(2020)showthatanelectricitysystembasedentirelyonrenewableenergy(asopposedtothecurrentenergymixbasedmainlyonoilandnaturalgas)wouldimproveenergysecurityin
Jordansignificantlyalongthedimensionsofavailability,cost,environment,andhealthandkeepthelevelofdiversityconstant.
Energysecurityandenergyindependencearestronglyinter-related,buttheincreaseindomestic
fossilfuelproductiontoachieveenergyindependencedelaysthegreentransition.Cohen,Joutz,and
Loungani(2011)distinguishbetweenenergyindependenceandenergysecurity,withtheformeronlyfocusedonreducingtheshareofimportedenergyinthenationalenergymix.Increasingenergyindependencethroughinvestmentsintodomesticfossilfuelproduction,however,conflictswiththeParisAgreementandeffortsto
reachnetzeroemissions.Thismeansthatenergysecurityandsustainableinvestmentcanbeachievedjointlyonlythroughinvestmentsintorenewableenergycapacity(Cevik2022).
IMFWORKINGPAPERS
EnergySecurityandTheGreenTransition
9
Thepoliticaldistancebetweenfossilfuelproducersandconsumershasdeclinedoverall.TheIDP
measureisbasedonvotesattheUnitedNationsGeneralAssemblyviaaBayesian-basedlogitmodeloverthethreevotingchoices(yea,abstain,nay).1ThehighertheabsolutevalueoftheIDPbetweenacountrypair,thehigherthepoliticalrisksandpotentialfordisruptiontoenergysupplyifonecountryisdependentontheother
foritsenergyneeds(seeIMF2023).However,duetotherestrictedavailabilityofbilateraltradedatabyfuel,itisconstructedonlyforOECDeconomiesandtheirimportsfromfossilfuelsuppliers.Aninterestingfactisthatthegeo-politicaldistancebetweennaturalgasexportingandimportingeconomieshasincreasedsince2010,possiblyreflectingtheplateauingofglobalizationfollowingtheglobalfinancialcrisisandtheheightenedtradeandfinancialbarriers(Aiyaretal.2023)sincethen(Figure2).
Figure2:Politicalriskscoresamongmajorfossilfuelproducers
(0-1,1:highest,0:lowest)
DemocracyindexICRGriskscoresIdealpointdistance2
coalNaturalgasoil
0.60
0.55
0.50
0.45
0.40
20062008201020122014201620182020
coalNaturalgasoil
0.40
0.35
0.30
0.25
0.20
200020042008201220162020
coal&coalproductsNaturalgasoil,primary
0.4
0.3
0.2
0.1
0.0
200020042008201220162020
Source:InternationalInternationalCountryRiskGuide,ThePRSGroup;EconomistIntelligenceUnit;Voeten,Strezhnev,andBailey,2009,UnitedNationsGeneralAssemblyVotingData;InternationalEnergyAgency,Coal,NaturalGas,andOilInformationStatistics;andIMFstaffcalculations.
Note:ThefirsttwochartsdisplaytheweightedaverageofconverteddemocracyindexandICRG.Conversionismadeby1?
and1?Irespectively.Theindexisweightedbydomesticproductionforeachyear.Thethirdchartdisplaystheweightedaverageof
convertedidealpointdistancebetweenselectedOECDcountriesandtheirfossilfuelsuppliers.Conversionismadeby1?.SamplesarelimitedtoOECDcountriesduetothecoverageofthedata.IdealpointdistanceisweightedbyimportingvaluesforeachOECDcountry,thenbyGDPvaluefortheaverageacrossOECDcountries.
Energysecurityrisks,amidconcentratedproductionandheightenedpoliticalrisks,havevariedacrossfueltypesinrecentyears.WhileFigure2showsthepoliticalrisksofmajorfossilfuelproducersovertime,
Figure3examinesifproductionhasrisenmoreinhighorlowpolitical-riskproducersacrossdifferent
dimensions.Overall,themagnitudesoftheshiftsinmarketsharestowards(orawayfrom)high-politicalriskproducers(in2019/2020relativeto2000)havedifferedacrossfuelsanddimensionsofpoliticalrisks.For
example,coalandnaturalgasproductionshaveshiftedtowardsregionswithlowerscoresondemocratic
freedom,higherrisksofinternalpoliticalinstabilityandlongergeo-politicaldistancebetweenproducingandimportingeconomies.However,thepictureforoilislessclear.Productionappearstohaveshiftedtowardcountrieswithbothlowandhighdemocraticfreedom,andtowardregionswithlowerpoliticalrisk,thelatterlargelyreflectingtheincreasedmarketsharesoftheUnitedStatesandCanada(Figure1).
1Thedistanceisnotestimatedbuttakendirectlyasavailablefromthislink:
/dataverse/Voeten
whichprovidesthemostupdatedversionofthedistanceforallthecountrypairs.
2TheIdealPointDistancerisktrendsareconstructedforOECDcountriesduetotherestrictedavailabilityofbilateraltradedatabyfuel.
IMFWORKINGPAPERS
EnergySecurityandTheGreenTransition
10
Figure3:Politicalriskandchangeinproductioninfossilfuels
(index:0-1,1=highestrisk;Percent)
Source:PRSGroup;InternationalEnergyAgency,Worldenergybalances;Voeten,Strezhnev,andBailey,2009,UnitedNationsGeneralAssemblyVotingData;InternationalEnergyAgency,Coal,NaturalGas,andOilInformationStatistics;andIMFstaff
calculation.
Note:Productioncomprisestheproductionofprimaryenergy.Thechartsshowtop50producersbasedon2000productionvalueforeachtypeoffuel,excludingoutliers.
Politicalriskinfluencesenergysecuritymainlythroughsupplydisruption.Inadditiontotheother
dimensionsofpoliticalrisksdiscussedabove(Figure2),wealsoassesstheconcentrationofenergyproductionacrossdifferentsystemsofgovernanceandculturesbasedonthewidelyusedFreedomHouseIndex
(FreedomHouse2022).Thegoalisnottodrawanycausallinkbetweendemocraticfreedomandpoliticalrisks.
Totheextentthatcivillibertiesandfreedommatterforinternalpoliticalstability(AisenandVeiga,2011),thentheirabsencemaypotentiallybemanifestedinenergysecurityrisks.Figure4showstheshareofglobal
productionoriginatingfromcountriesclassifiedasfree,partlyfree,ornotfree.Coalproduction,likeundertheotherriskindicators,hasbecomeincreasinglyconcentratedin“notfree”regions.Similartrendsareobservedfornaturalgasandoil.
IMFWORKINGPAPERS
EnergySecurityandTheGreenTransition
11
Figure4:Energyproductionbypoliticalfreedom
(percentofglobalproduction)
CoalNaturalgasOil
FreepartyFreeNotFree
100%
80%
60%
40%
20%
0%
199119962001200620112016
FreepartyFreeNotFree
100%
80%
60%
40%
20%
0%
199119962001200620112016
FreepartyFreeNotFree
100%
80%
60%
40%
20%
0%
199119962001200620112016
Source:InternationalEnergyAgency,WorldEnergyBalance;FreedomHouse;IMFstaffcalculation.
Note:Productioncomprisestheproductionofprimaryenergy.DramaticchangeinNaturalgasinearly2000isduetothechangeinthestatusofRUSfrom“PartlyFree”to“NotFree”.
Measurementofenergysecurity
Havingdefinedandidentifiedthekeydeterminantsofenergysecurityintheprecedingsection,thissectionisdevotedtothemeasurementofenergysecurity.Weproceedinthreesteps.First,wemeasureenergysecurityandquantifythecontributionofthedifferentdriverstoitsevolutionatthegloballevel.Second,werepeatthe
analysisatthecountryleveltoidentifycountry-specificdeterminantsofenergysecurity.Finally,wetestthe
predictivepowerofourindexbyillustratinghowcountry-levelmeasurescorrelatewithrecentmacroeconomicdevelopmentsinselectedeconomiesfacinganacuteenergycrisis.
Energysecurityatthegloballevel
Thereisasubstantialvarietyofenergysecurityindicesusedintheliterature.AsystematicreviewoftheenergysecurityliteraturebyGasser(2020)identifies63indices.Thesevarybyscope,numberofindicators
considered,datatreatmentapproach,multivariateanalysis,normalization,weighting,andaggregationofthe
indicators(seeliteraturereviewinBox1).Indexconstructiontypicallyfollowsastandardprocedureof
calculatingseveralindicators,normalizingthemtomakethemcomparable,weightingthemandaggregating
them.Broadly,energysecurityindicescanbegroupedintocomprehensiveandsimplemeasures.Theformeremploysarbitraryweightstocondensemultiplevariablesintoanindexwhilethelatterusessingleorfewer
variablesinadata-drivenframeworkthatavoidstheuseofarbitraryweights.Ourmeasureofenergysecurity
riskissimpleandavoidstheuseofarbitraryweights.Specifically,wefocusonthesecurityofsupplyforenergyimporters—whichisthedominantthemeintheliterature—viathelensofenergymarketconcentrationand
differentdimensionsofpoliticalrisks.Ourenergysecu
溫馨提示
- 1. 本站所有資源如無特殊說明,都需要本地電腦安裝OFFICE2007和PDF閱讀器。圖紙軟件為CAD,CAXA,PROE,UG,SolidWorks等.壓縮文件請下載最新的WinRAR軟件解壓。
- 2. 本站的文檔不包含任何第三方提供的附件圖紙等,如果需要附件,請聯(lián)系上傳者。文件的所有權(quán)益歸上傳用戶所有。
- 3. 本站RAR壓縮包中若帶圖紙,網(wǎng)頁內(nèi)容里面會有圖紙預(yù)覽,若沒有圖紙預(yù)覽就沒有圖紙。
- 4. 未經(jīng)權(quán)益所有人同意不得將文件中的內(nèi)容挪作商業(yè)或盈利用途。
- 5. 人人文庫網(wǎng)僅提供信息存儲空間,僅對用戶上傳內(nèi)容的表現(xiàn)方式做保護(hù)處理,對用戶上傳分享的文檔內(nèi)容本身不做任何修改或編輯,并不能對任何下載內(nèi)容負(fù)責(zé)。
- 6. 下載文件中如有侵權(quán)或不適當(dāng)內(nèi)容,請與我們聯(lián)系,我們立即糾正。
- 7. 本站不保證下載資源的準(zhǔn)確性、安全性和完整性, 同時也不承擔(dān)用戶因使用這些下載資源對自己和他人造成任何形式的傷害或損失。
最新文檔
- 德州職業(yè)技術(shù)學(xué)院《工程翻譯》2023-2024學(xué)年第二學(xué)期期末試卷
- 貴州電子商務(wù)職業(yè)技術(shù)學(xué)院《社會查與統(tǒng)計(jì)》2023-2024學(xué)年第二學(xué)期期末試卷
- 天津醫(yī)科大學(xué)臨床醫(yī)學(xué)院《大學(xué)化學(xué)下》2023-2024學(xué)年第二學(xué)期期末試卷
- 淮陰工學(xué)院《大學(xué)人文專題教育》2023-2024學(xué)年第二學(xué)期期末試卷
- 沈陽體育學(xué)院《中國法律思想史》2023-2024學(xué)年第二學(xué)期期末試卷
- 吉林農(nóng)業(yè)科技學(xué)院《游戲引擎原理及應(yīng)用二》2023-2024學(xué)年第二學(xué)期期末試卷
- 湖北職業(yè)技術(shù)學(xué)院《空間飛行器總體設(shè)計(jì)》2023-2024學(xué)年第二學(xué)期期末試卷
- 浙江工貿(mào)職業(yè)技術(shù)學(xué)院《非織造布設(shè)計(jì)》2023-2024學(xué)年第二學(xué)期期末試卷
- 天津國土資源和房屋職業(yè)學(xué)院《咖啡茶文化與服務(wù)理論教學(xué)》2023-2024學(xué)年第二學(xué)期期末試卷
- 河南機(jī)電職業(yè)學(xué)院《物理化學(xué)B(限選)》2023-2024學(xué)年第二學(xué)期期末試卷
- 婚內(nèi)財產(chǎn)債務(wù)協(xié)議書(通用)
- 部編版四年級下冊道德與法治 第4課 買東西的學(xué)問(第2課時) 教學(xué)課件
- 慢性活動性EB病毒課件
- 葡萄胎全面版課件
- 《冷沖壓工藝與模具設(shè)計(jì)》完整版ppt課件全套教程
- 業(yè)務(wù)招待費(fèi)明細(xì)單
- 高效液相色譜法分析(三聚氰胺)原始記錄1
- 典雅中國風(fēng)詩詞大會古風(fēng)PPT模板
- Part 7 Formal and Informal Styles課件
- 文化差異及跨文化交際試題集
- 油畫人體張東方姑娘的極致美
評論
0/150
提交評論