版權(quán)說明:本文檔由用戶提供并上傳,收益歸屬內(nèi)容提供方,若內(nèi)容存在侵權(quán),請進行舉報或認領
文檔簡介
ChasingtheDream:
Industry-Level
Productivity
DevelopmentsinEurope
SerhanCevik,SadhnaNaik,andKeyraPrimus
WP/24/258
NATn
2024
DEC
ARY
?2024InternationalMonetaryFundWP/24/258
IMFWorkingPaper
EuropeanDepartment
ChasingtheDream:Industry-LevelProductivityDevelopmentsinEuropePreparedbySerhanCevik,SadhnaNaikandKeyraPrimus1
AuthorizedfordistributionbyKazukoShironoDecember2024
IMFWorkingPapersdescriberesearchinprogressbytheauthor(s)andarepublishedtoelicitcommentsandtoencouragedebate.TheviewsexpressedinIMFWorkingPapersarethoseoftheauthor(s)anddonotnecessarilyrepresenttheviewsoftheIMF,itsExecutiveBoard,orIMFmanagement.
Abstract
Europeancountriesarelaggingbehindinproductivitygrowth,withsignificantproductivitygaps
acrossindustries.Inthisstudy,weusecomparableindustry-leveldatatoexplorethepatternsandsourcesoftotalfactorproductivity(TFP)growthacross28countriesinEuropeovertheperiod
1995–2020.Ourempiricalresultshighlightfourmainpoints:(i)TFPgrowthisdrivenlargelybytheextenttowhichcountriesareinvolvedinscientificandtechnologicalinnovationastheleader
countryorbenefitingfromstrongerknowledgespillovers;(ii)thetechnologicalgapisassociated
withTFPgrowthascountriesmovetowardsthetechnologicalfrontierbyadoptingnewinnovationsandtechnologies;(iii)increasedinvestmentininformationandcommunicationstechnology(ICT)
capitalandresearchanddevelopment(R&D)contributessignificantlytohigherTFPgrowth;and(iv)theimpactofhumancapitaltendstobestrongerwhenacountryisclosertothetechnologicalfrontier.ThecorefindingsofthisstudycallforpolicymeasuresandstructuralreformstopromoteinnovationandfacilitatethediffusionofnewandexistingtechnologiesacrossEurope.
JELClassificationNumbers:
H32;H40;L50;L60;L80;O30;O40;O52
Keywords:
Totalfactorproductivity;technology;R&D;innovation;humancapital;Europe
Author’sE-MailAddress:
scevik@;
snaik@;
kprimus@
1TheauthorswouldliketothankSandraBaquie,HelgeBerger,LukasBoer,BorjaGracia,VincenzoGuzzo,FlorenceJaumotte,andYangYangforvaluablecommentsandsuggestions.
3
Productivityisn'teverything,but,inthelongrun,itisalmosteverything.
—PaulKrugman
I.INTRODUCTION
Followinganextendedperiodofeconomictranquilityandrapidincomeconvergence,Europe
hasexperiencedabarrageoflargeshocksinrecentyearsthatresultedindivergingtrendsin
productivitygrowth,whichiskeytoraisingmateriallivingstandards,expandingtheeconomy’sgrowthpotential,andstrengtheninginternationalcompetitiveness.Understandingthedriversoftotalfactorproductivity(TFP)growth—ameasureoftechnologicaladvancementsandthe
efficiencyinutilizingfactorsofproduction—isthereforenecessarytodeveloppoliciesthatcanhelpstrengthengrowthprospects.WeobservethataggregateTFPgrowthintheEuropean
Union(EU)declinedfromanaverageof0.7percentbetween1996and2007to0.1percentover
theperiod2009–2019and-2percentin2020duringtheCOVID-19pandemic(Figure1).WealsodetectsignificantvariationinaverageTFPgrowthratesacrosstheEUovertheperiod1996–2020,
withaminimumof-2percentinGreecetoamaximumof2percentinSlovakia.These
productivitydevelopmentsattheaggregatelevel,however,canreflectsignificantstructuraldifferencesinhumanandphysicalcapitalaccumulationandtechnologicalprogressatthe
industrylevel.Accordingly,toprovideagranularempiricalassessment,thispaperfocusesonindustry-levelproductivitydevelopmentsthatdeterminetheaggregate.
TheproductivitygapbetweentheEUandtheUShaswidenedaftertheglobalfinancialcrisis
(GFC)in2008,withEUcountrieslaggingbehindinproductivitygrowth(Cette,Fernald,and
Mojon,2016;FernaldandInklaar,2020).Furthermore,therearesignificantproductivitygaps
acrossEUcountriesandindustries,whichhavebecomemoreprominentaftertheGFC.Inthis
study,welookbeyondthebroadcontoursofproductivitygrowthandusecomparableindustry-leveldata—drawnfromtheEU-KLEMSdataset—toexplorethepatternsandsourcesofTFP
growthacross28Europeancountriesovertheperiod1995–2020.Wecontributetotheliteraturebyusingthelatestandmostcomprehensiveindustry-leveldatasetincludingthepandemic
periodanddevelopingagranularanalysisoftradableandnon-tradablesectorsofthe
Figure1.TotalFactorProductivity(TFP)Growth
AverageTFPGrowth
(Percent)
8
6
4
2
0
-2
-4
-6
-8
Inter-QuartileRangeEU:TFPGrowth
1996199820002002200420062008201020122014201620182020
AverageTFPGrowth,1996-20201/
(Percent)
2.5 21.5 10.5 0-0.5 -1-1.5 -2-2.5
EL
PT
LU
HR
ES
IT
CY
SE
IE
FR
BE
NL
UK
DK
HU
EE
SI
AT
DE
CZ
PL
FI
LT
BG
LV
RO
SK
1/Time-spancoveredforeachcountryvariesdependingondataavailability.
Sources:EUKLEMS;authors’calculations.
4
economy.ThisrichsectoraldatasetcoveringalargenumberofeconomiesoveranextendedperiodbeforeandaftertheGFCallowsustoanalyzetheheterogeneityoftradableandnon-tradablesectorswithinandacrosscountries,aswellaswithin-sectorandbetween-sector
developmentsthataresensitivetoaggregationbias(deVriesetal.,2012;üng?r,2017).
Ourempiricalresults,inlinewithpreviousstudies,highlightfourmainpoints.2First,TFPgrowthisdrivenlargelybytheextenttowhichcountriesareinvolvedinscientificandtechnological
innovationastheleadercountryorbenefitingfromstrongerknowledgespillovers.Second,thetechnologicalgap—measuredbyacountry’sTFPdistancetothefrontier—isassociatedwithTFPgrowthascountriesmovetowardsthetechnologicalfrontierbyadoptingnewinnovationsand
technologies,asshowninFigure2.Third,increasedinvestmentininformationand
communicationstechnology(ICT)capitalandresearchanddevelopment(R&D)contributes
significantlytohigherTFPgrowthacrossallEUcountries.Fourth,humancapitalasmeasuredbytheintensityofhigh-skilledlaborattheindustryleveldoesnotappeartohaveastatistically
significantimpactonTFPgrowth,butthereissomeevidencethatthiseffectisstrongerwhenacountryisclosertothetechnologicalfrontierandhumancapitalmattersmoreinnon-tradablesthantradablesectorsoftheeconomy.Foramoregranularassessment,wealsoexplorethe
interactionofindustry-levelfactorswiththetechnologicalgapandfindthatbothICTandnon-ICTcapitalexpenditurestendtomoderatethenegativeeffectofthetechnologicalgaponTFP
growth.Lastly,weestimatethemodelforsubsamplesandshowthatthetechnologicalgapisanimportantdriveroftheTFPslowdowninpost-GFCperiod.
TFPgrowthintheEUstagnatedaftertheGFCandturnednegativewiththeCOVID-19pandemic,withsizableproductivitygapsbetweendifferentindustriesandacrosscountries.Reversingthe
downwardtrendandboostingproductivitygrowtharekeytoraisinglivingstandardsamidadversedemographictransitionsandglobaleconomicrealignments.Asourindustry-level
Tradables
4-
2-
TechnologicalGap
Figure2.TFPGrowthandTechnologicalGap
Non-Tradables
TechnologicalGap
Note:Thesechartsshowabinnedscatterplotof9,151observations.
Sources:EUKLEMS;authors’calculations.
2Theindustry-levelanalysispresentedinthispaperisbroadlyconsistentwithfirm-levelestimationsforEurope,whichalsohighlighttheimportanceofR&Dinvestmenttoboostproductivitygrowth(IMF,2024a).
5
empiricalanalysisindicates,revampingtangibleandintangiblecapitalinvestmentinnew
technologiescangeneratehigherTFPgrowthdirectlyandindirectlybyclosingthetechnologicalgapvis-à-visthefrontier.Wealsofindsomeevidencethathumancapitalmattersmorewhenacountryisclosertothetechnologicalfrontier,especiallyinnon-tradablesectors.Basedonthesefindings,thepriorityshouldbetocreateaconduciveenvironmenttoraisebusinessinvestmentandimprovecapitalallocationbyprovidingincentivesforcapitalinvestmentandR&Dand
strengtheninghumancapitalaccumulationthrougheducationandhealthcare,whichcaninturnpromoteinnovationandfacilitatethediffusionofnewandexistingtechnologiestocountries
belowthetechnologyfrontier,withpositivespilloversacrossindustries(Akcigit,Baslandze,andStantcheva,2016;Akcigit,Hanley,andSerrano-Velarde,2021;IMF,2024b).
TheempiricalanalysispresentedinthispapersuggestsanimportantroleforpoliciesinreducingthetechnologicalgapamongcountriesinEurope.Narrowinginnovationandtechnologygaps
vis-à-visthefrontierandexpandingthefrontierarekeytoadvancingproductivitygrowthonasustainablebasis.Thisrequires(i)revampingtangibleandintangiblecapitalinvestmentinnewtechnologiesand(ii)strengtheninghumancapitalforrapidprogressinscienceandtechnology.ThepriorityshouldthereforebegiventocreatingaconduciveenvironmentforhigherbusinessinvestmentandbettercapitalallocationbyprovidingincentivesforcapitalinvestmentandR&Dandstrengtheninghumancapitalaccumulationthrougheducationandhealthcare,whichcanin
turnpromoteinnovationandfacilitatethediffusionofnewandexistingtechnologiestocountriesbelowthetechnologyfrontier,withpositivespilloversacrossindustries.
Theremainderofthisstudyisorganizedasfollows.SectionIIprovidesabriefoverviewofthe
relatedliterature.SectionIIIdescribesthedatausedintheanalysis.SectionIVintroducesthe
salientfeaturesofoureconometricstrategy.SectionVpresentstheempiricalresults,includingaseriesofrobustnesschecks.Finally,SectionVIsummarizesandprovidesconcludingremarkswithpolicyimplications.
II.LITERATUREREVIEW
Theconceptualframeworkfortheanalysispresentedinthispaperisbasedonthestandard
modelofconditionalconvergence.Thisimpliesthatcountriescancatchuptothetechnological
frontier.However,differencesinsteady-statelevelsofproductivitydependonstructuralfeaturesoftheeconomy,suchaslaborandproductmarketregulations,qualityofinstitutionaland
physicalinfrastructure,sociodemographicfactors,technologyinnovationandadoption,amongothers.Thereisarichliteratureaimingtoexplaincross-countrydifferentialsinproductivityandincomegrowthpatterns(Solow,1956,1957;Swan,1956;Bartelsman,Haltiwanger,andScarpetta,2013;CraftsandO’Rourke,2013;Cette,Fernald,andMojon,2016;égert,2016;Crafts,2018).
Forlaborproductivity,studiesfindthatphysicalandhumancapitalaccumulationarethemaindeterminantsoflaborproductivitygrowthandkeycontributorsofthedivergenceacross
countries(Lucas,1988;Wolff,1991;BenhabibandSpiegel,1994;Maudos,Pastor,andSerrano,2000;Barro,2001;KumarandRussell,2002;HendersonandRussell,2005;F?re,Grosskopf,andMargaritis,2006;EnfloandHjertstrand,2009;HanushekandWoessmann,2015;égert,dela
6
Maisonneuve,andTurner,2023).Thesefindingssuggestthatincreasingproductivityrequires
economicpoliciesdesignedtoreducebarrierstocapitaldeepeningandimprovetheeducationandhealthoftheworkforce.
Anotherimportantfactorincross-countrydifferencesinproductivitygrowthisscientificprogressandtechnologicalchange(NelsonandPhelps,1966;Romer,1987,1990;GrosmanandHelpman,1991;AghionandHowitt,1992;Greenwood,Hercowitz,andKrusell,1997;ArcelusandArozena,1999;Hulten,2001;Krüger,2003;GuellecandvanPottelsberghedelaPotterie,2004;Margaritis,F?re,andGrosskopf,2007;vanArk,O’Mahony,andTimmer,2008;Badunenko,Henderson,and
Zelenyuk,2008;Syverson,2011;Araujo,Vostroknutova,andWacker,2017).Griffith,Redding,andVanReenen(2004),InklaarandTimmer(2007),Jorgenson,Ho,andStiroh(2008)andSchiersch,Belitz,andGornig(2015)developamoregranularapproachtoanalyzeTFPgrowthandobtain
similarevidenceattheindustrylevel.ThesefindingsindicatethateconomicpolicyshouldalsoaimatfosteringR&Dandthediffusionofnewtechnologiestoboostproductivity.
PublicinfrastructureiscriticalforeffectiveandefficienteconomicactivityandtherebyTFP
growthbyenablingfirmstoinvestinmoreproductivemachinery,preventingdelaysin
production,andcontributingtoeducationandhealthcareoftheworkforce(Aschauer,1989;
Munnell,1992;Hulten1996;Straub,2011;Deng,2013;CalderonandServen,2014;égert,2016).Thequalityofinstitutionalinfrastructureisnolessimportantforpoliticalandsocioeconomic
stabilityandeconomicdevelopmentbysafeguardingcivilandpropertyrightsandprovidingasafelivingandworkingenvironment(North,1990;KnackandKeefer,1995;EasterlyandLevine,2003;Acemoglu,Johnson,andRobinson,2004;Rodrik,Subramanian,andTrebbi,2004;ChandaandDalgaard,2008).Physicalinfrastructureandinstitutionsalsoplayanimportantroleintradeopenness,financialdevelopmentandtheefficientallocationofresources,whichinturn
determineproductivitygrowthacrossfirmsandindustries(GrossmanandHelpman,1991;
Edwards,1998;Beck,Levine,andLoayza,2000;MillerandUpadhay,2000;Foster,Haltiwanger,andKrizan,2001;AlcaláandCiccone,2004;HisehandKlenow,2009;RestucciaandRogerson,2017;CevikandMiryugin,2018).
III.DATAOVERVIEW
Theempiricalanalysispresentedinthispaperisbasedonanunbalancedpanelofannual
observationson26industriesin28EUcountriesduringtheperiod1995–2020.3Theprimary
datasetforindustry-leveldataisobtainedfromtheEU-KLEMSdatabase,whichprovideshigh-
qualitymeasuresofeconomicgrowth,productivity,employmentcreation,capitalformationandtechnologicalchangeattheindustrylevelforallEUmemberstates.4Inparticular,itmakesdataavailableondifferenttypesofcapitalandskills-differentiatedcategoriesoflabor.Grossoutputisdecomposedintothecontributionsofintermediateinputs(i.e.,energy,materials,andservices)as
3IndustriesaregroupedaccordingtothestatisticalclassificationofeconomicactivitiesbasedontheNomenclaturedesActivitéséconomiquesdanslaCommunautéEuropéenne(NACE).
4Thelatestreleaseofthedatasetispubliclyavailableat
https://euklems-intanprod-llee.luiss.it/
(Bontadinietal.,2023).O’MahonyandTimmer(2009)provideadetaileddescriptionofthecontentsandconstructionoftheEU-KLEMSdatabase.
7
wellasvalue-added,whichinturnisdecomposedtothecontributionsfromdifferenttypesofcapitalandlabor.
Dataareavailableforsevendifferenttypesofcapital,whichareaggregatedbasedontheuser
costofcapitaltoproducecapitalserviceflowsthattakeintoaccountthedifferentmarginal
productivitiesofthedifferentcomponentsofacountry’scapitalaccumulation.Inadditionto
aggregatemeasures,theEU-KLEMSdatabasealsomakesavailablethebreakdownforICTand
non-ICTphysicalcapitalspendingasashareofgrossfixedinvestment.5Wealsoobtainindustry-leveldataonintangiblecapitalaccumulationasmeasuredbyR&Dexpenditureasashareof
grossfixedinvestment.
Laborinputsaredifferentiatedwithrespecttoskilllevelsasmeasuredbyeducationalattainment(primary,secondary,andtertiary),age,andgender.Inthispaper,weusetheshareoftotal
workinghoursprovidedbyworkerswithtertiaryeducationtomeasuretheshareofhigh-skilledlaborinagivenindustry.Comparablecross-countrydataattheindustrylevelareavailablefor
threedifferentskilllevels,withlaborinputsaggregatedbasedonmarginalproductivities.ThesegranulardataseriesallowtheassessmentofTFPdevelopmentsexcludingtheimpactofchangesinthecompositionandqualityofbothcapitalandlaborinputs.
Thedependentvariableinthisstudyisindustry-levelTFPgrowth,whichiscommonlymeasuredasaresidualafteraccountingforphysicalcapitaldeepeningandhumancapitalaccumulation.TheEU-KLEMSdatabaseprovidesadecompositionofGDPgrowthintoitsmaindeterminants
basedonaproductionfunctionwhichincludesproductivecapitalandemploymentlevels
adjustedforhoursworked,age,andforskillcomposition.Accordingly,TFPgrowthisdefinedasaresidualterm:
Δyijt=Δvijt?wvijt?wΔkijt?wΔLijt
whereΔyijtisTFPgrowthincountryiandindustryjattimetandV,K,andLdenotevalue-
added,capital,andlabor,respectively.Thecoefficientswandwaretheaverageshareof
capitalandlaborinputs,respectively.Tomitigatetheeffectsofextremeoutliers,wewinsorizeindustry-levelvariablesatthe5thand95thpercentiles.
ThemainexplanatoryvariablesofinterestattheindustrylevelaretheTFPgrowthfrontieras
measuredbythehighestlevelofTFPgrowthinagivenindustryandyearandthetechnologicalgapasmeasuredbythedistancetofrontierdefinedasthelevelofTFPofacountryinagiven
industryandyearrelativetothehighestlevelofTFPinthatindustryintheEU.Thisrelative
distancetothefrontierrepresentsthepotentialforincreasingTFPbyadoptingnewproductivity-enhancingknowledgeandtechnologies.Inaddition,weincludearangeofmacroeconomicandinstitutionalfactorsatthecountrylevel,suchasrealGDPpercapita,consumerpriceinflation,
tradeopenness,domesticcredittotheprivatesector(i.e.financialdevelopment),population,andbureaucraticqualityascontrolvariables,whicharedrawnfromtheIMF’sWorldEconomic
5ICTassetsincludecomputers,softwareandtelecommunicationequipment,whilenon-ICTassetsareproxiedbytransportationequipment.
8
Outlook(WEO),theWorldBank’sWorldDevelopmentIndicators(WDI),andtheInternationalCountryRiskGuide(ICRG)databases.
SummarystatisticsforthevariablesusedintheanalysisarepresentedinTable1.Weobserve
significantheterogeneityinaggregateandindustry-levelproductivitygrowthbetween28EU
countries,across26sectors,andovertheperiod1995–2020.AggregateTFPgrowthwas0.7
percentperyearonaverageintheEUbetween1996and2007butdeceleratedto0.1percent
aftertheGFC.Asaresult,overtheentiresampleperiodfrom1996to2020,averageTFPgrowthstoodat0.5percent,with11outof28EUcountriespresentinganegativeTFPgrowth.WealsoobservethatTFPgrowthinaccommodationandfoodservices—thelowestproductivitysector—was1.6percentagepointslowerthantheaverageTFPgrowthacrossallsectorsduringthe
sampleperiod,whileTFPgrowthinagriculture—thehighestproductivitysector—was1.4
percentagepointshigherthantheaverageTFPgrowth.Thereisalsosignificantheterogeneityinthetechnologicalgap.Withanaverageof-19.2percent,itvariesfrom-67.7percentto0percent.
Withregardstoindustry-levelfactors,weobservesimilarlylargevariationacrosssectors(Figure3).ICTcapitalspendingaveraged12.6percentofgrossfixedinvestment,withaminimumof0
percentandamaximumof44.6percent,whilenon-ICTcapitalspendingvariedfromaminimumof0.3percentofgrossfixedinvestmenttoamaximumof32.6percent,withanaverageof8.3
percent.Likewise,R&Dexpenditureasashareofgrossfixedinvestmentamountedtoanaverageof9.5percent,withaminimumof0percentandamaximumof47.8percent.
Table1.DescriptiveStatistics
Variable
Obs
Mean
SD
Min.
Max.
Industry-level
TFPgrowth
8,438
0.5
7.0
-50.0
100.0
Technologicalgap
9,151
-19.2
16.8
-67.7
0.0
ICTcapitalspending
11,879
0.1
0.1
0.0
0.4
Non-ICTcapitalspending
14,612
0.1
0.1
0.0
0.3
R&Dspending
12,315
0.1
0.1
0.0
0.5
Country-level
RealGDPpercapita
18,021
37873.8
18718.5
9544.1
122170.6
Inflation
17,969
5.3
41.3
-1.7
1061.2
Financialdevelopment
14,369
98.5
81.8
0.2
524.6
Tradeopenness
18,021
1.1
1.0
0.0
14.0
Bureaucraticquality
17,633
3.3
0.8
1.0
4.0
Population
18,021
18.1
22.8
0.4
83.2
Source:EU-KLEMS;IMF;WorldBank;ICRG;andauthors'calculations.
9
Figure3.Industry-LevelDevelopments
AverageTFPGrowth:Pre-GFC
AverageTFPGrowth:Post-GFC
(Percent)
Agriculture
FinanceandInsuranceManufacturing
WholesaleandretailtradeICT
Energy,waterandwasteTotal
Miningandquarrying
TransportationandstorageConstruction
Publicadmin,defenseandhealthAccomodationandfoodArtsandrecreation
ProfessionalandsupportserviceRealestate
(Percent)
ManufacturingAgriculture
WholesaleandretailtradeICT
Total
Professionalandsupportservice FinanceandInsurance TransportationandstoragePublicadmin,defenseandhealthRealestate
Construction Artsandrecreation MiningandquarryingEnergy,waterandwasteAccomodationandfood
-2-1.5-1-0.500.511.52
-2-1.5-1-0.500.511.52
MedianICTInvestmentbyIndustry
(Percent,measuredasashareoftotalinvestment)
MedianNon-ICTInvestmentbyIndustry
(Percent,measuredasashareoftotalinvestment)
ICT FinanceandinsuranceProfessionalandsupportservicesWholesaleandretailtrade
Artsandrecreation
Total
ManufacturingPublicadmin,defenseandhealth Accomodationandfood TransportationandstorageConstruction
Energy,waterandwasteMiningandquarryingAgriculture
Realestate
Transportationandstorage
ProfessionalandsupportserviceConstruction
WholesaleandretailtradeAgriculture
Total
AccomodationandfoodFinanceandInsuranceMiningandquarryingArtsandrecreation
Publicadmin,defenseandhealthManufacturing
Energy,waterandwasteICT
Realestate
010203040
AverageShareofHighSkillLaborbyIndustry
(Percent,measuredasshareoftotalemploymentineachindustry)
ICT
FinanceandInsurance
Realestate
TotalMiningandquarrying
ManufacturingWholesaleandretailtradeTransportationandstorage AccomodationandfoodConstruction
Agriculture
020406080
0204060
MedianR&DInvestmentbyIndustry
(Percent,measuredasashareoftotalinvestment)
ManufacturingProfessionalandsupportservicesPublicadmin,defenseandhealth
ICT
Total ArtsandrecreationWholesaleandretailtrade MiningandquarryingFinanceandInsurance
ConstructionEnergy,waterandwaste
AgricultureTransportationandstorageRealestate
Accomodationandfood
05101520
Sources:EUKLEMS;andauthors’calculations.
IV.ECONOMETRICMETHODOLOGY
Beyondglobalshocks,thereisamyriadoffactorscontributingtotheproductivityslowdownandcross-countryproductivitydifferentials.Inthispaper,wedevelopagranularanalysisbyusing
comparableindustry-leveldata—drawnfromtheEU-KLEMSdataset—andexplorethepatterns
andsourcesofTFPgrowthacrossthe28EUcountries.FollowingScarpettaandTressel(2002),
NicolettiandScarpetta(2003),Griffith,Redding,andVanReenen(2004),Acemoglu,Zilibotti,andAghion(2006),AghionandHowitt(2006),McMorrow,Werner,andTurrini(2010)andDabla-
10
Norrisetal.(2015),wemodelindustry-levelTFPgrowthusingthefollowingbaselinespecification:
+yj+μt+εijt
?Yijt=β0+β1?YLjt+β2(Yijt?1?YLjt?1)+βk∑kxt?1+βl∑kxjt?1(Yijt?1?YLjt?1)+ηi
inwhich?YijtisTFPgrowthincountryiandindustryjattimet.?YLjtdenotestheTFPgrowth
frontierintheEU,whichismeasuredbythehighestlevelofTFPgrowthinindustryjattimet.
TheTFPgrowthfrontiercapturestheextenttowhichcountriesareinvolvedincomparable
scientificandtechnologicalinnovationastheleadercountryorbenefitingfromknowledge
spillovers.(Yijt?1?YLjt?1)isthetechnologicalgapdefinedastheTFPdifferenceincountryiandindustryjattimetwithrespecttotheEUfrontier(highestlevelofTFP)inindustryjattimet.ThisrelativedistancetothefrontierrepresentsthepotentialforincreasingTFPbyadoptingnew
productivity-enhancingtechnologies.xt?1isavectorofindustry-levelandcountry-level
variables.Industry-levelvariablesincludeICTcapitalspending,non-ICTcapitalspending,R&Dspending,andtheshareofhigh-skilledlabor,whilecountry-levelvariablesincluderealGDPper
capita,consumerpriceinflation,tradeopenness,domesticcredittotheprivatesector,population,andbureaucraticquality.
Wealsoexplorehowindustry-levelfactors(ICTandnon-ICTcapitalexpenditures,R&Dspendingandtheshareofhigh-skilledlabor)interactwiththetechnologicalgap.Theseinteractionterms
aredesignatedbyxjt?1(Yijt?1?YLjt?1)incountryiandindustryjattimet.Thecoefficientsηi,
yjandμtdenotethetime-invariantindustry-specificeffectsandthetimeeffectscontrollingforcommonshocksthatmayaffectTFPgrowthacrossallindustriesattimet,respectively.6The
inclusionoffixedeffectsalsohelpsaddressendogeneityconcernsarisingfromomittedvariablebias.εijtistheidiosyncraticerrorterm.Robuststandarderrorsareclusteredattheindustrylevel.
V.EMPIRICALEVIDENCE
Ourbaselineresults,presentedinTable2,provideaconsistentassessmentofindustry-levelTFPgrowthin28EUcountriesovertheperiod1995–2020.Wedisplaythespecificationwithcountryfixedeffectsincolumn[1]forthewholesampleofindustries,incolumn[2]fortradablesectors,andincolumn[3]fornon-tradablesectors.7Wereplacecountryfixedeffectswitharangeof
country-levelcontrolvariablesandpresenttheseestimationsincolumn[4]forthewholesampleofindustries,incolumn[5]fortradablesectors,andincolumn[6]fornon-tradablesectors.
Becausedataontheshareofhigh-skilledlaborareavailableonlyfrom2008,wepresentthat
6Countryfixedeffectsarenotincludedwhenthemodelincorporatescountry-levelcontrolvariables.Theresultsarenotsensitivetoreplacingcountryfixedeffectswithcountry-levelvariables,whichprovideadditional
information.Wealsoobtainbroadlysimilarresultswiththeinclusionofcountry-yearandcountry-industryfixedeffects.
7Tradablesectorsincludeagriculture,forestry,fishing,mining,quarrying,andmanufacturing;whilenon-tradablesectorsincludeconstruction,wholesaleandretailtrade,transportation,storage,accommodation,foodservice,
ICT,finance,insurance,realestate,professionals
溫馨提示
- 1. 本站所有資源如無特殊說明,都需要本地電腦安裝OFFICE2007和PDF閱讀器。圖紙軟件為CAD,CAXA,PROE,UG,SolidWorks等.壓縮文件請下載最新的WinRAR軟件解壓。
- 2. 本站的文檔不包含任何第三方提供的附件圖紙等,如果需要附件,請聯(lián)系上傳者。文件的所有權(quán)益歸上傳用戶所有。
- 3. 本站RAR壓縮包中若帶圖紙,網(wǎng)頁內(nèi)容里面會有圖紙預覽,若沒有圖紙預覽就沒有圖紙。
- 4. 未經(jīng)權(quán)益所有人同意不得將文件中的內(nèi)容挪作商業(yè)或盈利用途。
- 5. 人人文庫網(wǎng)僅提供信息存儲空間,僅對用戶上傳內(nèi)容的表現(xiàn)方式做保護處理,對用戶上傳分享的文檔內(nèi)容本身不做任何修改或編輯,并不能對任何下載內(nèi)容負責。
- 6. 下載文件中如有侵權(quán)或不適當內(nèi)容,請與我們聯(lián)系,我們立即糾正。
- 7. 本站不保證下載資源的準確性、安全性和完整性, 同時也不承擔用戶因使用這些下載資源對自己和他人造成任何形式的傷害或損失。
最新文檔
- 素描靜物基礎課程設計
- 機械課程設計直齒錐齒輪
- 理想電源課程設計
- 2024河南省建筑安全員A證考試題庫及答案
- 禮儀培訓文案課程設計
- 簡單創(chuàng)意動漫課程設計
- 電池管理系統(tǒng)考核試卷
- 直流電課課程設計
- 電子樂器演奏與現(xiàn)場演出技巧考核試卷
- 程序循環(huán)課程設計
- 數(shù)學文化欣賞
- 脊柱區(qū)1教學講解課件
- KK5-冷切鋸操作手冊-20151124
- 教你炒紅爐火版00纏論大概
- 消防管道施工合同
- 大學生計算與信息化素養(yǎng)-北京林業(yè)大學中國大學mooc課后章節(jié)答案期末考試題庫2023年
- 2023年國開大學期末考復習題-3987《Web開發(fā)基礎》
- 《駱駝祥子》1-24章每章練習題及答案
- 國際金融課后習題答案(吳志明第五版)第1-9章
- 《基于杜邦分析法周大福珠寶企業(yè)盈利能力分析報告(6400字)》
- 全國英語等級考試三級全真模擬試題二-2023修改整理
評論
0/150
提交評論