版權(quán)說明:本文檔由用戶提供并上傳,收益歸屬內(nèi)容提供方,若內(nèi)容存在侵權(quán),請進行舉報或認領(lǐng)
文檔簡介
1、一些英文審稿意見的模板最近在審一篇英文稿,第一次做這個工作,還有點不知如何表達。幸虧遇上我的處女審稿, 我想不會槍斃它的,給他一個 majorrevision 后接收吧。呵呵網(wǎng)上找來一些零碎的資料參考參考。+1、目標和結(jié)果不清晰。ItisnotedthatyourmanuscriptneedscarefuleditingbysomeonewithexpertiseintechnicalEnglis heditingpayingparticularattentiontoEnglishgrammar,spelling,andsentencestructuresothatthegoalsandres
2、ultsofthestudyarecleartothereader.2、未解釋研究方法或解釋不充分。Ingeneral,thereisalackofexplanationofreplicatesandstatisticalmethodsusedinthestudy.Furthermore,anexplanationofwhytheauthorsdidthesevariousexperimentsshouldbeprovided.3、對于研究設(shè)計的rationale:Also,therearefewexplanationsoftherationaleforthestudydesign.4、夸張地
3、陳述結(jié)論 / 夸大成果 / 不嚴謹:Theconclusionsareoverstated.Forexample,thestudydidnotshow ifthesideeffectsfrominitialcopperburstcanbeavoidwiththepolymerformulation.5、對 hypothesis的清晰界定:Ahypothesisneedstobepresented。6、對某個概念或工具使用的rationale/定義概念:Whatwastherationaleforthefilm/SBFvolumeratio?7、對研究問題的定義:Trytosettheprobl
4、emdiscussedinthispaperinmoreclear, writeonesectiontodefinetheproblem8、如何凸現(xiàn)原創(chuàng)性以及如何充分地寫literaturereview:Thetopicisnovelbuttheapplicationproposedisnotsonovel.9、對 claim, 如 AB 的證明, verification:Thereisnoexperimentalcomparisonofthealgorithmwithpreviouslyknownwork,soitisimpossible tojudgewhetherthealgorith
5、misanimprovementonpreviouswork.10、嚴謹度問題:MNQiseasierthantheprimitivePNQS,howtoprovethat.11、格式(重視程度):Inaddition,thelistofreferencesisnotinourstyle.Itisclosebutnotcompletelycorrect.Ihavea ttachedapdffilewithInstructionsforAuthorswhichshowsexamples.Beforesubmittingarevisionbesurethatyourmaterialisproper
6、lypreparedandformatted.Ifyouar eunsure,pleaseconsulttheformattingnstructionstoauthorsthataregivenundertheInstructio nsandFormsbuttoninheupperright-handcornerofthescreen.12、語言問題(出現(xiàn)最多的問題):有關(guān)語言的審稿人意見:ItisnotedthatyourmanuscriptneedscarefuleditingbysomeonewithexpertiseintechnicalEnglisheditingpayingpart
7、icularattentiontoEnglishgrammar,spelling,andsentencestructuresothatthegoalsandresultsofthestudyarecleartothereader.Theauthorsmusthavetheirworkreviewedbyapropertranslation/reviewingservicebeforesubmission;onlythencanaproperreviewbeperformed.Mostsentencescontaingrammaticaland/orspellingmistakesorareno
8、tcompletesentences.Aspresented,thewritingisnotacceptableforthejournal.Thereareproblemswithsentencestructure,verbtense,andclauseconstruction.TheEnglishofyourmanuscriptmustbeimprovedbeforeresubmission.Westronglysuggestthatyouobtainassistancefromacolleaguewhoiswell-versedinEnglishorwhosenativelanguagei
9、sEnglish.PleasehavesomeonecompetentintheEnglishlanguageandthesubjectmatterofyourpapergooverthepaperandcorrectit?thequalityofEnglishneedsimproving.作為審稿人,本不應(yīng)該把編輯部的這些信息公開(冒風險?。?,但我覺得有些意見值得廣大投稿人注意,就貼出來吧,當然,有關(guān)審稿人的名字,Email ,文章題名信息等就都刪除了,以免造成不必要的麻煩!希望朋友們多評價,其他有經(jīng)驗的審稿人能常來指點大家!國人一篇文章投Mater. 類知名國際雜志,被塞爾維亞一審稿人打2
10、5 分!個人認為文章還是有一些創(chuàng)新的,所以作為審稿人我就給了 66 分,(這個分正常應(yīng)該足以發(fā)表),提了一些修改意見,望作者修改后發(fā)表!登錄到編輯部網(wǎng)頁一看,一個文章竟然有六個審稿人,詳細看了下打的分數(shù), 60 分大修, 60 分小修, 66 分(我), 25 分拒,(好家伙,竟然打 25 分,有魄力),拒但沒有打分(另一國人審),最后一個沒有回來!兩個拒的是需要我們反思和學習的?。ɡㄌ栃斌w內(nèi)容為我注解)Reviewer4ReviewerRecommendationTerm:RejectOverallReviewerManuscriptRating:25CommentstoEditor:Rev
11、iewersarerequiredtoentertheirname,affiliationande-mailaddressbelo w.Pleasenotethisisforadministrativepurposesandwillnotbeseenbytheauthor.Title(Prof./Dr./Mr./Mrs.):Prof.Name:XXXAffiliation:XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXxManuscriptentitledSynthesisXXX。ithasbeensynthesizedwithanumberofdifferentmethodsandin
12、avarietyofforms.Thismanuscript doesnotbringanynewknowledgeordataonmaterialspropertyandthereforeonlycontributionmaybe innovelpreparationmethod,stillthispointisnotelaboratedproperly(seeRemark1).Presentati onandwritingisratherpoor;thereareseveralstatementsnotsupportedwithdata(forsomeseeRema rks2)andeve
13、nsomeflaws(seeRemark3).ForthesereasonsIsuggesttorejectpaperinthepresentfor m.1.ThepaperdescribesanewmethodforpreparationofXXXX,but:-thenewmethodhastobecomparedwithothermethodsforpreparationofXXXXpowders(INTRODUCTION-literaturedata,RESULTSANDDISCUSSION-discussion), (通常的寫作格式,審稿人實際上很在意的)-ithastobedescr
14、ibedwhythismethodisbetterordifferentfromothermethods,(INTRODUCTION-lit eraturedata,RESULTSANDDISCUSSION-discussion),-ithastobeaddedinthemanuscriptwhatkindofXXXXXXbyothermethodscomparedtothisnovelone(IN TRODUCTION-literaturedata,RESULTSANDDISCUSSION-discussion),-ithastobeoutlinedwhatisthebenefitofthi
15、smethod(ABSTRACT,RESULTSANDDISCUSSION,CONCLUSI ONS).(很多人不會寫這個地方,大家多學習?。?.WhendiscussingXRDdataXXXauthors-statethatXXXXX-statethatXXXX-Thisusuallyhappenswithincreasingsinteringtime,butarethereanydatatopresent,density,pa rticlesize?(很多人用 XRD,結(jié)果圖放上去就什么都不管了,這是不應(yīng)該的)3.Whendiscussingluminescencemeasurement
16、sauthorswriteXXXXXIfthereissecondharmonicinex citationbeamitwillstaytherenomatterwhattypeofmaterialoneinvestigates!(研究了什么?)4. 英語寫作要提高(這條很多人的軟肋,大家努力?。㏑eviewer5ReviewerRecommendationTerm:RejectOverallReviewerManuscriptRating:N/ACommentstoEditor:Title(Prof./Dr./Mr./Mrs.)rof.Name:(國人)Affiliation:XXXXXXX
17、XxxxxXXXXXXXXXXXXXxxxxDeareditor:ThankyouforinvitingmetoevaluatethearticletitledXXXX“.Inthispaper,theauthorsinvestigatedtheinfluencesofsinteringconditiononthecrystalstructureandXXXXXX , However,itisdifficultforustounderstandthemanuscriptbecauseofpoorEnglishbeingused.Thetextisnotwellarrangedandthelog
18、icisnotclear.ExceptEnglishwriting,therearemanymistak esinthemanuscriptandtheexperimentalresultsdontshowgoodandnewresults.SoIrecommendtoyo uthatthismanuscriptcannotbeaccepted.Thefollowingarethequestionsandsomemistakesinthism anuscript:(看看總體評價,不達標,很多人被這樣郁悶了,當然審稿人也有他的道理)1.TheXXXXXXX.However,thiskindmat
19、erialhadbeeninvestigatedsince1997asmentionedintheauth orsmanuscript,andsimilarworkshadbeenpublishedinsimilarjournals.Whatarethenovelfindingsinthepresentwork?Thesynthesismethodandluminescencepropertiesreportedinthismanuscrip tdidntsupplyenoughevidencetosupporttheprimenoveltystatement.(這位作者好猛,竟然翻出自己 1
20、997 年的中文文章翻譯了一邊就敢投國際知名雜志,而且沒有新的創(chuàng)新!朋友們也看到了,一稿多發(fā),中文,英文雙版發(fā)表在網(wǎng)絡(luò)時代太難了,運氣不好審稿人也是國人,敢情曾經(jīng)看過你的文章,所以必死無疑, 這位作者老兄就命運差了,剛好被審稿人看見, 所以毫無疑問被拒,(呵呵,我 97 年剛上初一沒見到這個文章,哈哈)2.Inpage5,theauthormentionedthat:XXXXBasedonourknowledge,sinteringdescribestheprocesswhenthepowdersbecomeceramics.So,Ithinkthewordsynthesisshouldbeb
21、etterinsteadofsinteringhere.Second,theXRDpatternsdidntshowobviousdifferencebetweenthreesinteringt emperaturesof700,800and900?C.(作者老兄做工作太不仔細了,蟲子們可別犯?。?.AlsointhepageX,theauthormentionedthat:XXX。However,theauthordidntsupplythemorphologiesofparticlesatdifferentsynthesizingtempera tures.Whataretheexperi
22、mentalresultsorthereferenceswhichsupporttheauthorsconclusionthattheXXXXpropertieswouldbeinfluencedbytheparticlesize?(作者仍在瞎說,這個問題我也指出了, 不光我還是看著國人的份上讓修改,添加很多東西, 說實話,文章看的很累很累)4.XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXHowever,tomyknowledge,afterthemilling,theparticlessizewillbedecrease dexactly,buthowandwhattodestroythehoststru
23、cture?(蟲子們自己注意)5.XXXontheverticalaxisoftheXRDpatternswasmeaningless,becauseauthoraddseveralpatternsinonefigure.Itisobviousthatthesespectraarenotmeasuredbyordinarymethods.(都是老問題, 不說了)好東西原文地址: 對英文審稿意見的回復(fù) 作者:海天奧博一篇稿子從醞釀到成型歷經(jīng)艱辛,投出去之后又是漫長的等待,好容易收到編輯的回信,得到的往往又是審稿人不留情面的一頓狂批。這時候,如何有策略有技巧的回復(fù)審稿人就顯得尤為重要。好的回復(fù)是文
24、章被接收的重要砝碼,而不恰當?shù)幕貜?fù)輕則導(dǎo)致再次修改從而拖延發(fā)稿時間,重則導(dǎo)致文章被拒,前功盡棄。下面把我平時總結(jié)的一些答復(fù)審稿人的策略和寫回復(fù)信的格式和技巧跟大家交流一下。首先,絕對服從編輯的意見。在審稿人給出各自的意見之后,編輯一般不會再提出自己的意見。但是,編輯一旦提出某些意見,就意味著他認為這是文章里的重大缺陷,至少是不合他的口味。這時,我們唯一能夠做的只能是服從。因為畢竟是人家掌握著生殺予奪的大權(quán)。第二,永遠不要跟審稿人爭執(zhí)。跟審稿人起爭執(zhí)是非常不明智的一件事情。審稿人意見如果正確那就不用說了,直接照辦就是。如果不正確的話,也大可不必在回復(fù)中冷嘲熱諷,心平氣和的說明白就是了。大家都是青
25、年人,血氣方剛,被人拍了當然不爽,被人錯拍了就更不爽了。尤其是一些名門正派里的弟子,看到一審結(jié)果是major 而不是 minor 本來就已經(jīng)很不爽了,難得抓住審稿人的尾巴,恨不得拖出來打死。有次審稿,一個審稿人給的意見是增加兩篇參考文獻(估計也就是審稿人自己的文章啦),結(jié)果作者在回復(fù)中寫到, makingareferenceisnotcharity !看到之后我當時就笑噴了,可以想象審稿人得被噎成什么樣。正如大家所想的那樣,這篇稿子理所當然的被拒了,雖然后來經(jīng)編輯調(diào)解改成了 majorrevision,但畢竟耽誤的是作者自己的時間不是?第三,合理掌握修改和argue 的分寸。所謂修改就是對文章
26、內(nèi)容進行的修改和補充,所謂argue 就是在回復(fù)信中對審稿人的答復(fù)。這其中大有文章可做,中心思想就是容易改的照改,不容易改的或者不想改的跟審稿人 argue 。對于語法、拼寫錯誤、某些詞匯的更換、對某些公式和圖表做進一步解釋等相對容易做到的修改,一定要一毫不差的根據(jù)審稿意見照做。而對于新意不足、創(chuàng)新性不夠這類根本沒法改的,還有諸如跟算法A,B,C,D 做比較,補充大量實驗等短時間內(nèi)根本沒法完成的任務(wù),我們則要有理有據(jù)的 argue 。在 Argue 的時候首先要肯定審稿人說的很對, 他提出的方法也很好, 但本文的重點是 blablabla ,跟他說的不是一回事。 然后為了表示對審稿人的尊重,
27、象征性的在文中加上一段這方面的 discussion ,這樣既照顧到了審稿人的面子,編輯那也能交待的過去。第四,聰明的掌握修改時間。拿到審稿意見,如果是 minor ,意見只有寥寥數(shù)行,那當然會情不自禁的一蹴而就,一天甚至幾小時搞定修改稿。這時候,問題在于要不要馬上投回去了?我的意見是放一放,多看一看,兩個星期之后再投出去。這樣首先避免了由于大喜過望而沒能及時檢查出的小毛病,還不會讓編輯覺得你是在敷衍他。如果結(jié)果是major ,建議至少放一個月再投出去,顯得比較鄭重。上面是一些一般性的答復(fù)審稿人的策略,在實際中的應(yīng)用還需要大家見仁見智。下面談?wù)劥饛?fù)信的寫法。寫答復(fù)信的唯一目的是讓編輯和審稿人一
28、目了然的知道我們做了哪些修改。因此,所有的格式和寫法都要圍繞這一目的。一般來說可以把答復(fù)信分成三部分,即ListofActions,ResponsestoEditor,ResponsestoReviewers。第一部分 ListofActions的作用是簡明扼要的列出所有修改的條目,讓編輯和審稿人在第一時間對修改量有個概念,同時它還充當著修改目錄的作用,詳見下面的例子。剩下的兩部分是分別對編輯和審稿人所做的答復(fù),格式可以一樣,按照“意見”“ argue”(如果有的話)“修改”這樣逐條進行。清楚醒目起見,可以用不同字體分別標出,比如“意見”用italic,“ argue”正常字體,“修改”用bo
29、ld 。下面舉例說明各部分的寫法和格式。編輯意見:請在修改稿中用雙倍行距。審稿人 1:意見 1:置疑文章的創(chuàng)新性,提出相似的工作已經(jīng)被A 和 B做過。意見 2:算法表述不明確。意見 3:對圖 3 的圖例應(yīng)做出解釋。審稿人 2:意見 1:圖 2 太小。意見 2:第 3 頁有個錯別字。很顯然,根據(jù)上面的答復(fù)策略,我們準備對除1 號審稿人意見1 之外的所有意見進行相應(yīng)改動,而對1.1 采取 argue 為主的策略。答復(fù)如下:ListofActionsLOA1:Therevisedmanuscriptisdoublespaced.LOA2:Adiscussiononnoveltyofthisworka
30、ndacomparisonwithAandBhavebeenaddedinpage3.LOA3:Aparagraphhasbeenaddedinpage5tofurtherexplainthealgorithm*.LOA4:ExplanationsofthelegendofFigure3havebeenaddedinpage7.LOA5:Figure2hasbeenenlarged.LOA6:Alltyposhavebeenremoved.=分頁 =ResponsestoEditor請在修改稿中用雙倍行距。Wehavedoublespacedthetextthroughouttherevise
31、dmanuscript,seeLOA1.=分頁 =ResponsestoReviewersToReviewer1:意見 1:置疑文章的創(chuàng)新性,提出相似的工作已經(jīng)被A 和 B做過。Thankyouforpointingthisout.AandBsresearchgroupshavedoneblablablabla.However,thefocusofourworkisonblablablabla,whichisverydifferentfromAandBswork,andthisisalsothemajorcontributionofourwork.Wehaveaddedthefollowing
32、discussiononthisissueinourrevisedmanuscript,seeLO A2.“blablablabla(此處把A 和 B的工作做一個review ,并提出自己工作和他們的區(qū)別之處) ”意見 2:算法表述不明確。Wehaveaddedthefollowingdiscussiontofurtherexplainalgorithm*,seeLOA3.“blablablabla(此處進一步解釋該算法)”意見 3:對圖 3 的圖例應(yīng)做出解釋。WehaveaddedthefollowingexplanationsofthelegendofFigure3,seeLOA3.“bl
33、ablablabla (圖 3 圖例的解釋)”=分頁 =ToReviewer2:意見 1:圖 2 太小。WehaveenlargedFigure2,seeLOA4.意見 2:第 3 頁有個錯別字。Wehaveremovedalltypos,seeLOA5.=分頁 =總之,寫答復(fù)信的宗旨就是用最少的時間和工作量達到論文被接收的目的。這里權(quán)當是拋磚引玉,希望和大家多多交流。SCI 投稿信件的一些套話( 整理 )一、投稿信1.DearDr.DefendiML:Iamsendingamanuscripte ntitled “” by whichIshouldliketosubmitforpossibl
34、epublication inthejournalof-.Yourssincerely2.DearDr.A:Enclosedisamanuscriptentitled “” bysb,whichwearesubmittingforpublicationinthejourna lof-.Wehavechosenthisjournalbecauseitdealswith-.Webelievethatsthwouldbeofinterestto thejournal sreaders.3. Dear Dr.A:Pleasefindenclosedforyourreviewanoriginalrese
35、archarticle, “” bysb.Allauthorshaverea dandapprovethisversionofthearticle,andduecarehasbeentakentoensuretheintegrityofthew ork.Nopartofthispaperhaspublishedorsubmittedelsewhere.Noconflictofinterestexitsinth esubmissionofthismanuscript,andwehaveattachedtothisletterthesignedlettergrantingusp ermission
36、touseFigure1fromanothersource.Weappreciateyourconsiderationofourmanuscript,andwelookforwardtoreceivingcommentsfro mthereviewers.二、詢問有無收到稿件DearEditors,Wedispatchedourmanuscripttoyourjournalon3August2006buthavenot,asyet,receiveacknowledgementoftheirsafearrival.Wefearthatmayhavebeenlostandshouldbegrate
37、fulifyouwouldletusknowwhetherornotyouhavereceivedthem.Ifnot,wewillsendourmanuscriptagain.Thankyouinadvanceforyourhelp.三、詢問論文審查回音DearEditors ,Itismorethan12weekssinceIsubmittedourmanuscript(No:)forpossiblepublicationinyourjou rnal.Ihavenotyetreceivedareplyandamwonderingwhetheryouhavereachedadecision.
38、Ishoulda ppreciatedyourlettingmeknowwhatyouhavedecidedassoonaspossible.四、關(guān)于論文的總體審查意見1.Thisisacarefullydonestudyandthefindingsareofconsiderableinterest.Afewminorrevisio narelistbelow.2.Thisisawell-writtenpapercontaininginterestingresultswhichmeritpublication.Fortheb enefitofthereader,however,anumbero
39、fpointsneedclarifyingandcertainstatementsrequiref urtherjustification.Therearegivenbelow.3.Althoughtheseobservationareinteresting,theyareratherlimitedanddonotadvanceourknow ledgeofthesubjectsufficientlytowarrantpublicationinPNAS.Wesuggestthattheauthorstrysubmittingtheirfindingstospecialistjournalsuc
40、has4.Althoughthispaperisgood,itwouldbeeverbetterifsomeextradatawereadded.5.Thismanuscriptisnotsuitableforpublicationinthejournalof becausethemainobservatio nitdescribewasreported3yearsagoinareputablejournalof-.6.PleaseasksomeonefamiliarwithEnglishlanguagetohelpyourewritethispaper.Asyouwillsee ,Ihave
41、madesomecorrectionatthebeginningofthepaperwheresomesyntaxisnotsatisfactory.7.Wefeelthatthispotentiallyinterestingstudyhasbeenmarredbyaninabilitytocommunicatet hefindingcorrectlyinEnglishandshouldliketosuggestthattheauthorsseektheadviceofsomeo newithagoodknowledgeofEnglish,preferablenativespeaker.8.T
42、hewordingandstyleofsomesection,particularlythoseconcerningHPLC,needcarefuleditin g.AttentionshouldbepaidtothewordingofthosepartsoftheDiscussionofandSummarywhichhave beenunderlined.9.PreliminaryexperimentsonlyhavebeendoneandwithexceptionofthatsummarizedinTable2,no nehasbeenrepeated.Thisisclearlyunsat
43、isfactory,particularlywhenthereissomuchvariatio nbetweenassays.10.Theconditionofincubationarepoorlydefined.Whatisthetemperature?Wereantibodyused?五、給編輯的回信1.Inreplytotherefereesmaincriticismofpaper,itispossibletosaythatOneminorpointraisedbytherefereeconcernsoftheextracompositionofthereactionmixtureinF
44、igure1.Thishasnowbeencorrected.Furtherminorchangeshadbeenmadeonpage3,paragraph1(lin e3-8)and2(line6-11).Thesedonotaffectourinterpretationoftheresult.2.Ihavereadthereferee scommentsverycarefullyandconcludethatthepaperhasbeenrejected onthesolegroundsthatitlaketoxicitydata.IadmitthatIdidnotincludeatoxi
45、citytableinmyar ticlealthoughperhapsIshouldhavedone.Thiswasforthesakeofbrevityratherthananerrororom ission.3.Thankyouforyourletterofandfortherefereescommentsconcerningourmanuscriptentitled“” .Wehavestudiedtheircommentscarefullyandhavemadecorrectionwhichwehopemeetwiththeirapproval.4.Ienclosedarevised
46、manuscriptwhichincludesareportofadditionalexperimentsdoneatthereferee ssuggestion.Youwillseethatouroriginalfindingsareconfirmed.5.Wearesendingtherevisedmanuscriptaccordingtothecommentsofthereviewers.Revisedportionareunderlinedinred.6.Wefoundtherefereescommentsmosthelpfulandhaverevisedthemanuscript7.
47、Wearepleasedtonotethefavorablecommentsofreviewersintheiropeningsentence.8.Thankyouforyourletter.IamverypleasedtolearnthatourmanuscriptisacceptableforpublicationinCancerResearchwithminorrevision.9.Wehavethereforecompletedafurtherseriesofexperiments,theresultofwhicharesummarizedinTable5.Fromthisweconcludethatintrinsicfactorisnotaccount.10.Wedeletedtherelevantpassagesincetheyarenotessentialtothecontentsofthepaper.11.IfeelthatthereviewerscommentsconcerningFigures1and2res
溫馨提示
- 1. 本站所有資源如無特殊說明,都需要本地電腦安裝OFFICE2007和PDF閱讀器。圖紙軟件為CAD,CAXA,PROE,UG,SolidWorks等.壓縮文件請下載最新的WinRAR軟件解壓。
- 2. 本站的文檔不包含任何第三方提供的附件圖紙等,如果需要附件,請聯(lián)系上傳者。文件的所有權(quán)益歸上傳用戶所有。
- 3. 本站RAR壓縮包中若帶圖紙,網(wǎng)頁內(nèi)容里面會有圖紙預(yù)覽,若沒有圖紙預(yù)覽就沒有圖紙。
- 4. 未經(jīng)權(quán)益所有人同意不得將文件中的內(nèi)容挪作商業(yè)或盈利用途。
- 5. 人人文庫網(wǎng)僅提供信息存儲空間,僅對用戶上傳內(nèi)容的表現(xiàn)方式做保護處理,對用戶上傳分享的文檔內(nèi)容本身不做任何修改或編輯,并不能對任何下載內(nèi)容負責。
- 6. 下載文件中如有侵權(quán)或不適當內(nèi)容,請與我們聯(lián)系,我們立即糾正。
- 7. 本站不保證下載資源的準確性、安全性和完整性, 同時也不承擔用戶因使用這些下載資源對自己和他人造成任何形式的傷害或損失。
最新文檔
- 第13課 五四運動
- 《企業(yè)及管理》課件
- 項目里程碑成果展
- 秋分習俗的地理解讀
- 大班月份工作計劃
- 2023年-2024年項目管理人員安全培訓(xùn)考試題答案標準卷
- 《電流跟電壓》課件
- 隧道隧道內(nèi)環(huán)境監(jiān)測-洞察分析
- 性別平等與人口質(zhì)量的關(guān)系-洞察分析
- 宇宙微波背景輻射的精細結(jié)構(gòu)分析-洞察分析
- DL∕T 5161.6-2018 電氣裝置安裝工程質(zhì)量檢驗及評定規(guī)程 第6部分:接地裝置施工質(zhì)量檢驗
- DL∕T 1502-2016 廠用電繼電保護整定計算導(dǎo)則
- 《吃飯有講究》教學反思
- 《公路建設(shè)項目數(shù)據(jù)管理、交付及電子文件歸檔管理規(guī)范》
- 湖南省建筑工程定額
- 高鐵乘務(wù)員的儀態(tài)禮儀課件
- 污水排入城鎮(zhèn)污水管網(wǎng)排放口設(shè)置技術(shù)規(guī)范
- 浙江省紹興市2023-2024學年高一上學期1月期末考試英語試題(解析版)
- 事業(yè)單位獎勵審批表主要事跡教師300字范文六篇
- 煤氣柜試運行總結(jié)
- 人際溝通:協(xié)調(diào)職場關(guān)系提高工作效率
評論
0/150
提交評論