【經(jīng)營(yíng)企劃】杜邦she審核英文報(bào)告

1、 evaluation for safety, health, environmental(june 23, 2003)a site evaluation of she was conducted of procedures, systems, field area tours, spot interviews, and records. ding ming guan - asia sourcing center, sourcing specialistsummary:the team based on chinese regulations and had reference of dupo

2、nt she standards and industry best practice guideline (nfpa) .in general terms, the operation only aligns with minimum essential with intent to meet regulations. however, it appears they do not monitor regulation upgrades and appear to be out of regulation in areas from lack of knowledge or understa

3、nding.since the site could not supply all consent to operate documentation nor data, and the most managers are absence, we can not assess whether or not current operation fully meet regulations. an assessment of current operations against regulations for such items as the operators of fork lift truc

4、k and welding are without permits from the local government.conclusion: the she evaluation study has identified several areas that need improvement. these improvements primarily require changes in work practices, procedure development, training of personnel and the operational discipline to insure c

5、onsistent implementation.however: the site should be requested the following for confirmation during business negotiation.the all operators with special hazards job which governmental required should attend the proper training and get the permits from the government agency.the most shea procedures n

6、eeds to be updated for covering all regulation requirements and keep operational discipline.safety and fire protectionthey have the policy of safety which be posted on the wall, the most safety procedures are in general and not cover all regulation requirements such as fire protection management. th

7、ere are not important procedures in place such as lock tag try and confined space work procedures. the operational procedures are not integrated she requirements and elements such as ppe required. two contractors are painting the floor in the workshop without work permit and being monitor. there are

8、 not contractor management procedure in place.one operator showed his personal respirator , i was said that he did not receive proper trained for using and maintenance. the host claimed that there were not any injuries and fire cases. but we noted one switch was burned in the warehouse.we noted that

9、 the walkway in no. 1 workshop and gates was obstructed by products and package material. the damaged plates were stored in disorder under the crane.i checked one operator of the fork lift truck, he said that he had not got the permit and he claimed to inspect the fork lift truck daily but could not

10、 show us the records.i checked one operator of welding, he said that he had not got the permit also.we noted that the cylinders of oxygen and fuel were stored together. there three works are worked in storage area without any sign to warn for the repair work.i noted that four workers loaded the prod

11、ucts on the road, i was confirmed that this was normal work.the warehouse was full stored by package material and products and oil.there are exit sign and emergency light in office building, but without it in workshop and lab and warehouse.the site has sprinkler, detection nor alarm systems in the o

12、ffice building but without it in workshop and warehouse and lab. their fire protection system consisting of some fire extinguishers and depends on local fire agency response. i was informed that they have emergency response organization, but they could provide limited related records.the government

13、fire brigade agency is very close to the site, it is about 5minutes for the distance. the site did not set up process safety management system, and did not conduct process hazards analysis or consequence analysis.the site provide one permits of handling hazards chemicals on site from fire protection

14、 agency, but could not provide any documents of hygiene administration agency approved for the facility.the site could not provide any design base of the facility, so it is difficult to ensure this facility meet all of the fire safety and protection codes required by governmentflammable reagents was

15、 stored in lab without secondary containment and will need to be installed.general field observations indicated a weak preventative maintenance program and few or inadequate equipment guards for rotating equipment.recommendation:an immediate training and awareness program would be needed. the site s

16、hould obtain the information of the facility design base and the documents of fire protection and hygiene administration agency approved for the facility. the site should conduct a formal process hazardous analysis and list a action plan to control the risk of safety and fire protection. an inventor

17、y of equipment guarding will need to be developed, prioritized and implemented. the site should consider how to eliminate the risk at the source, to ensure the facility is inherent safety. process safety management (psm)the site could not provided the information of design base for the boilers syste

18、m. emission data was not available to determine whether the facilities are operated in compliance.the site did not set up the management systems program and/or procedures for process safety management.the site could not provide block flow diagram or simplified process flow diagram.the site has not c

19、onducted a process hazardous analysis.the site could not provide any procedures or information to align with audit checklist for psm elements in technology, personnel, and facilities.the site never conduct sitewide emergency drills. the site conducted extinguisher using exercise on field in annually

20、, but, they could not provide the related records.recommendation:the site should obtain the information of design base for the key process equipment, such as the boiler system and the storage tanks of lpg. the site should set up the psm system, and develop procedures and audit checklist for psm elem

21、ent: technology, personnel, and facilities, and begin to run the management system. the site should conduct sitewide emergency drills in routinely. the site should consider how to eliminate the risk at source, ensure the process inherent safety. occupational health managementthe site has not organiz

22、ed an occupational health management system. they reported that occupational medical surveillance was conducted in annually. however, the site could not provide the surveillance reports.recommendations:the site would need to become familiar with government requirements on occupational health managem

23、ent, and identify a corrective action plan. the site would need to develop a management system of occupational health. the site will need to improve the system of occupational health for items listed below.occupational health hazardsthe site has not conducted any formal occupational health risk asse

24、ssments nor could they provide sampling data. the site reported they were aware of possible occupational health hazards as outlined below. this does not correct the issues as must control the source. listed occupational health hazards at the facility:1/ chemicals.some chemicals are used in the proce

25、ss, but they did not show us the details since confidentail concerned. the site require and provide some unproper ppe to the operators for handling these chemicals.2/ dust is apparent in raw material area. the site has not monitor the dust concentration; however, dust was visible in above areas duri

26、ng my field checking.3/ ergonomics.we noted the operators are clearing the spindles in awful position, the management had aware to need improvement after we communicated. the site uses human power to load and unload most products.4/ indoor air quality.acetone and sulfate acid and other chemicals rea

27、gents were used in the process. the site has not monitored the concentration in air in the area for either personnel exposure nor flammability. recommendation:operations would need to implement use of ppe immediately. the site would then monitor the level of dust, phenol and other potential health h

28、azards in related area. the site should require and provide proper ppe for handling hazards chemicals. the site should conduct a formal occupational health risk assessments, and list one plan to control the risk for operators. the site should consider and implement how to eliminate the risk at sourc

29、e to insure compliance with all regulations.medicalthe site does not have medicine procedures. the site does not require medical pre-employment nor surveillance for new employees. i was told the site conducts medical surveillance in, but they could not provide any records.recommendation: the site sh

30、ould conduct a formal medical surveillance of all employees and a special occupational health surveillance for the operators in the workshop with the occupational risk. the site should set up medicine procedures. then arrange health files for each employee, and conduct fitness for duty. the site sho

31、uld conduct the medical and occupational surveillance in regularly, and should track and manage the cases of illness and injury. solid/liquid wastes and managementthe solid waste (main contain is active mud from waster water facility) is sent out by one contractor, but they did not know how to be tr

32、eated and could not show the contract.recommendation:the site should review or audit the process of the solid waste handing by the contractor and make a contract with the them. the site should review and assess the status of wastes management and update the system to manage all solid/liquid wastes.s

33、oil, groundwater, and surface waterthe site did not operate groundwater wells for water supply. there are not monitoring wells located on or near the site or has groundwater quality been otherwise investigated. there are not underground tank and underground pipelines on the property.there are one ri

34、ver closed to the property, but they could not provide water quality information.recommendation:the site should get and review the engineering design information and installation detail of the underground tank. the site should monitor the water quality in the river and the groundwater quality, and c

35、onduct a assessments. the site could set up a ongoing monitoring programs.water pollution controlthe site provided one copy of permits from the environmental protection agency for wastewater discharge to the river.the site did not construct proper dike to control cleaning water for leaking or droppi

36、ng in loading and unloading area. the site does not monitor the incoming clean water supply. there were no issues raised relative to water supply quality or quantity, although no data was available for review.recommendation:the site should conduct a formal assessment to find the pollution source. the dike