認(rèn)知語(yǔ)言學(xué)參考書(shū)目

1、精品文檔認(rèn)知語(yǔ)言學(xué)參考資料Aitchiso n, J. 1987. Words in the Mi nd: An In troduction to the Men tai Lexico n.Oxford: BasilBlackwell Ltd.Anderson, J. R. 1983. The Architecture of Cognition. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Anderson, J. R. 1995. Cognitive Psychology and its Implications. New York: W. H. Feem

2、an and Compa ny.Bach, K. 1987. Thought and Refere nee Oxford: Oxford Un iversity Press.Barsalou, L. W. 1982. Context-independent information and context-dependent information in con cepts. Memory & Cog nition 10: 82-93.Barsalou, L. W. 1983. Ad hoc categories. Memory & Cog nition 11: 211-227.Barsalou

3、, L. W. 1987. The in stability of graded structure: Implicatio ns for the n ature of concepts. In U. Neisser (ed.), Concepts and Conceptual Development: Ecological and Intellectual Factors in Categorization . New York: Cambridge University Press, 101-140.Barsalou, L. W. & B. H. Ross. 1986. The roles

4、 of automatic and strategic processing in sen sitivity to superord in ate and property freque ncy. Jour nal of Experime ntal Psychology: Learni ng, Memory and Cog nition 12: 116-134.Barsalou, L. W. & J. W. Hutchinson. 1987. Schema-basedplanning of events in consumer con texts. In P. F. An ders on &

5、M. Walle ndorf (eds.), Adva nces in Con sumer Research, Vol. 14. Provo, UT: Association for Con sumer Research, 114-118.Blakemore, D. 1987. Sema ntic Con stra ints on Releva nee Oxford: Blackwell.Blakemore, D. 2002. Releva nee and Lin guistic Meaning: The Sema ntics and Pragmatics of Discourse Marke

6、rs. Cambridge: Cambridge Un iversity Press.Carston, R. 1988. Language and cognition. In F. J. Newmeyer (ed.), Linguistics: The Cambridge Survey, Vol. 3. Cambridge: Cambridge Uni versity Press, 38-68.Croft, W. & A. D. Cruse. 2004. Cognitive Linguistics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Fauc onni

7、er, G 1994. Men tal Spaces: Aspects of Meaning Con struct ion in Natural Lan guage . New York: Cambridge Un iversity Press.Fauconnier, G 1997. Mappings in Thought and Language. Cambridge: Cambridge UniversityPress.Fauconnier, G. & M. Turner. 1998. Conceptual integration networks . Cognitive Science

8、22: 133-187.Fischer, K. 2000. From Cognitive Semantics to Lexical Pragmatics: The Functional Polysemy of Discourse Particles. New York: Mout on de Gruyter.Fodor, J. A. 1975. The Lan guage of Thought. New York: T. Y. Crowell.Fodor, J. A. 1983. The Modularity of Mind . Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Fodor,

9、J. A. 1998. Co ncepts: Where Cog ni tive Scie nee Went Wro ngOxford: Clare ndon Press.Fodor, J. A. & Z. W. Pylyshy n. 1988. Conn ecti on ism and cog nitive architecture: A critical analysis. Cognition 28: 3-71.Foster-Cohe n, S. H. 2000. Releva nee: Communi cati on and cog niti on. Second Lan guage R

10、esearch16(1): 77-92.Frege, G. 1977. On Concept and Object. In P. Geach & M. Black (eds.),Translations fromthe Philosophical Writings of Gottlob Frege . Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Gibbs, R. W. 1987. The releva nee of releva nee for psychological theory. Behavioral and Brain Scie nces 10: 718-719.Goatly,

11、 A. 1994. Register and redempti on of releva nee theory: The case of metaphor. Pragmatics 4: 139-181.Green, D. W. et al. 1996. Cognitive Scienee: An Introduction . Cambridge, MA: Blackwell.Gutt, E.-A. 1991. Tran slation and Releva nee: Cog ni tio n and Con text. Oxford: Blackwell.Jary, M. 1998. Rele

12、va nee and the com muni cati on of polite ness. Jour nal of Pragmatics 30: 1-19.Jaszczolt, K. M. 1996a. Releva nee and infini ty: Implicatio ns for discourse in terpretati on. Journal of Pragmatics 25: 703-722.Joh nso n, M. 1987. The Body in the Mi nd. Chicago: The Uni versity of Chicago Press.Jorda

13、 n, M. P. 1998. The power of n egati on in En glish: Text, eon text and releva nee. Jour nal of Pragmatics 29: 705-752.Jucker, A. H. 1997. Review on Releva nee: Communi cati on and Cogn iti on. Jour nal of Pragmatics 27: 107-119.Lakoff, G . & M. Johnson. 1980. Metaphors We Live By. Chicago: The Univ

14、ersity of ChicagoPress.Langacker, R. W. 1991. Foundations of Cognitive Grammar, Vol. 1-2. Stanford: Stanford Un iversity Press.Marmaridou, S. S. A. 2000. Pragmatic Meaning and Cognition . Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Marte n, L. 2002. At the Syn tax-Pragmatics In terface: Verbal Un derspecificati on an

15、d Con cept Formation in Dynamic Syntax. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Rouchota, V. & A. H. Jucker (eds.) 1998.Curre nt Issues in Releva nee Theory. Amsterdam:Joh n Benjamins.Scha nk, R. & R. P. Abels on. 1977. Scripts, Pla ns, Goals, and Un dersta ndi ng . Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Sperber, D. 1994b.

16、 The modularity of thought and the epistemology of representation. In L. A. Hirschfeld & S. A. Gelman (eds.), Mapping the Mind: Domain Specificity in Cognition and Culture. Cambridge: Cambridge Uni versity Press, 39-67.Sperber. D. 1997. I ntuitive and reflective beliefs. Mi nd and Lan guage 12: 67-8

17、3.Sperber, D. 2000. Metarepresentations in an evolutionary perspective. In D. Sperber (ed.), Metarepresentations: A Multidisciplinary Perspective. New York: Oxford University Press, 117-137.Sperber, D. & D. Wils on. 1986. Releva nee: Commu ni catio n and Cog nitio n. Oxford: Blackwell Publishers Ltd

18、.Sperber, D. & D. Wilso n. 1990. Rhetoric and releva nee. In D. Wellbery & J. Ben der (eds.), The Ends of Rhetoric: History, Theory, Practice. Stanford: Stanford University Press, 140-155.Sperber, D. & D. Wilso n. 1995. Releva nee: Commu nication and Cog ni tion (2 nd ed.). Oxford: Blackwell Publish

19、ers Ltd.Sperber, D. & D. Wils on. 1996. Fodor frame problem and releva nee theory: A reply to Chiappe & Kukla. Behavioral & Brain Sciences 19: 530-532.Sperber, D. & D. Wils on. 1997. Remarks on releva nee theory and the social scie nces. Multili ngua 16: 145-151.Sperber, D. & D. Wils on. 1998a. The

20、mapp ing betwee n the men tal and public lexic on. In P.Carruthers & J. Boucher (eds.), Language and Thought. Cambridge: CambridgeUn iversity Press, 184-200.Sperber, D. & D. Wils on. 1998b. Iro ny and releva nee: A reply to Drs Seto, Hamamoto andYama nashi. I n R. Carst on & S. Uehida (eds.), Releva

21、 nee Theory: Applieati ons and Implieations. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 283-293.Sperber, D. & D. Wils on. 2002. Pragmaties, modularity and min dreadi ng.Mind & Lan guage17: 3-23.Sperber, D. & D. Wilso n. 2005. Pragmaties. UCL Worki ng Papers in Lin guisties 17: 353-388.Ungerer, F. & H. J. Sehmid. 19

22、96. An Introduetion to Cognitive Linguisties. London: Lon gma n.Wils on, D. 1999. Releva nee and releva nee theory. In R. Wils on & F. Keil (eds.), MIT Eneyelopedia of the Cognitive Seienees. Cambridge, MA : MIT Press, 719-722.Wils on, D. 2000. Metareprese ntati on in lin guistie eom muni eati on. I

23、n D. Sperber (ed.), Metareprese ntatio ns. New York: Oxford Un iversity Press, 411-448.Wils on, D. 2003. Releva nee Theory and lexieal pragmaties. Italia n Jour nal of Linguisties/Rivista di Linguistiea 15(2): 273-291.Wils on, D. 2004a. Releva nee and lexieal pragmaties. UCL Work ing Papers in Lin g

24、uisties 16: 343-60.Wils on, D. 2004b. Releva nee, word meaning and eom muni eati on: The past, prese nt, and future of lexieal pragmaties. Modern Foreign Languages (現(xiàn)代外語(yǔ))1: 1-13.Wils on, D. 2005a. New direet ions for researeh on pragmaties and modularity. Lin gua 115: 1129-1146.Wilson, D. 2005b. Pra

25、gmaties. In F. Jaekson & M. Smith (eds.), Oxford Handbook of Co ntemporary Philosophy. Oxford: Oxford Un iversity Press, 468-501.Wilson, D. & R. Carston. 2008. Metaphor and the emergenproperty roblem: A relevanee-theoretie treatment. The Baltie International Yearbook of Cognition, Logie and Communieation 3 (2007), 1-40