




版權(quán)說(shuō)明:本文檔由用戶提供并上傳,收益歸屬內(nèi)容提供方,若內(nèi)容存在侵權(quán),請(qǐng)進(jìn)行舉報(bào)或認(rèn)領(lǐng)
文檔簡(jiǎn)介
1、經(jīng)皮冠狀動(dòng)脈介入治療指南經(jīng)皮冠狀動(dòng)脈介入治療指南(2009)解讀解讀中國(guó)醫(yī)學(xué)科學(xué)院阜外心血管病醫(yī)院中國(guó)醫(yī)學(xué)科學(xué)院阜外心血管病醫(yī)院 高潤(rùn)霖高潤(rùn)霖類類已證實(shí)和(或)一致公認(rèn)某診療措施有益、有用和有已證實(shí)和(或)一致公認(rèn)某診療措施有益、有用和有效效類類某診療措施的有用性和有效性的證據(jù)尚有矛盾或存在某診療措施的有用性和有效性的證據(jù)尚有矛盾或存在不同觀點(diǎn)不同觀點(diǎn) aa類類有關(guān)證據(jù)和(或)觀點(diǎn)傾向于有用和有效。有關(guān)證據(jù)和(或)觀點(diǎn)傾向于有用和有效。 bb類類有關(guān)證據(jù)和(或)觀點(diǎn)尚不能充分說(shuō)明有用和有效。有關(guān)證據(jù)和(或)觀點(diǎn)尚不能充分說(shuō)明有用和有效。類類* *已證實(shí)和(或)一致公認(rèn)某診療措施無(wú)用和無(wú)效并在已
2、證實(shí)和(或)一致公認(rèn)某診療措施無(wú)用和無(wú)效并在有些病例可能有害,不推薦應(yīng)用。有些病例可能有害,不推薦應(yīng)用。指南對(duì)適應(yīng)證的建議指南對(duì)適應(yīng)證的建議證據(jù)水平證據(jù)水平 a資料來(lái)自于多項(xiàng)隨機(jī)臨床試驗(yàn)或匯總分析資料來(lái)自于多項(xiàng)隨機(jī)臨床試驗(yàn)或匯總分析證據(jù)水平證據(jù)水平 b資料來(lái)自單項(xiàng)隨機(jī)臨床試驗(yàn)或多項(xiàng)非隨機(jī)試驗(yàn)資料來(lái)自單項(xiàng)隨機(jī)臨床試驗(yàn)或多項(xiàng)非隨機(jī)試驗(yàn)證據(jù)水平證據(jù)水平 c專家的意見和專家的意見和/或小型試驗(yàn)結(jié)果或小型試驗(yàn)結(jié)果指南對(duì)適應(yīng)證的建議指南對(duì)適應(yīng)證的建議boden we et al. am heart j. 2006;151:1173-9. boden we et al. n engl j med. 2007
3、;356:1503-16.optimal medical therapy* + pci (n = 1149)optimal medical therapy(n = 1138)aha/acc class i/ii indications for pci, suitable coronary artery anatomy + 70% stenosis in 1 proximal epicardial vessel + objective evidence of ischemia (or 80% stenosis + ccs class iii angina without provocation
4、testing) primary outcomes: all-cause mortality, nonfatal mifollow-up: median 4.6 yearsrandomized*intensive pharmacologic therapy + lifestyle interventionccs = canadian cardiovascular societysecondary outcomes: death, mi, stroke; acs hospitalizationnumber at riskmedical therapy 1138 1017 959 834 638
5、408 192 30pci 1149 1013 952 833 637 417 200 35years01234560.00.50.60.70.80.91.0pci + omtoptimal medical therapy (omt)7freedom fromdeath or mi (%)death/miat 4.6 yrs19.0%18.5%boden we et al. n engl j med. 2007;356:1503-16.p 0.001p = 0.02nsangina-free(%)nsischemia reduction 5%in 105 pts with moderate-t
6、o-severe baseline ischemiashaw la. aha 2007death or mi rate (%)ischemia reduction 5%(n=68)no ischemia reduction(n=37)shaw la. aha 2007in 105 pts with moderate-to-severe baseline ischemia intended all-comers study design instead of a highly selected patient population consensus physician agreement (s
7、urgeon & cardiologist) instead of inclusion & exclusion criteria and, nested registries for cabg only and pci only to define patient characteristics and outcomes of these two unique treatment options71% enrolled (n=3,075)all pts with de novo 3vd and/or lm disease (n=4,337) treatment preferen
8、ce (9.4%) referring md or pts. refused informed consent (7.0%) inclusion/exclusion (4.7%) withdrew before consent (4.3%) other (1.8%) medical treatment (1.2%)taxusn=903pcin=198cabgn=1077cabgn=897no f/un=4285yr f/un=649pciall captured w/ follow upcabg2500750 w/ f/utotal enrollment n=3075stratificatio
9、n: lm and diabetestwo registry armsrandomized armsn=1800two registry armsn=1275randomized armsn=1800heart team (surgeon & interventionalist)pcin=198cabgn=1077amenable for only one treatment approachtaxus*n=903 cabgn=897amenable for bothtreatment optionsstratification: lm and diabeteslm33.7%3vd66
10、.3%lm34.6%3vd65.4%23 us sites62 eu sites+ +itt populationevent rate 1.5 se, *fisher exact testall deathrevascularizationcva (stroke)myocardial infarctiontaxus* (n=903)cabg (n=897)p=0.0015*061210200months since allocationcumulative event rate (%)itt population12.1% 17.8% event rate 1.5 se. *fishers e
11、xact testtaxus* (n=903)cabg (n=897)p=0.89patients (%)itt populationtaxus* (n=903)cabg (n=897)p=0.44*061220400months since allocationcumulative event rate (%)13.6% 15.8% taxus (n=357)cabg (n=348)event rate 1.5 se, *fisher exact testitt populationsianos et al, eurointervention 2005;1:219-227valgimigli
12、 et al, am j cardiol 2007;99:1072-1081serruys et al, eurointervention 2007;3:450-459bari classification of coronary segmentsleaman score, circ 1981;63:285-299lesions classification acc/aha , circ 2001;103:3019-3041bifurcation classification, cci 2000;49:274-283cto classification, j am coll cardiol 1
13、997;30:649-656061220400months since allocationcumulative event rate (%)taxus (n=118)cabg (n=103)p=0.19*7.7%13.0%event rate 1.5 se, *fisher exact testcalculated by core laboratory; itt populationmean baselinesyntax scorecabg15.5 4.3taxus 15.7 4.4061220400months since allocationcumulative event rate (
14、%)taxus (n=195)cabg (n=92)event rate 1.5 se, *fisher exact testcalculated by core laboratory; itt populationp=0.54*15.5%12.6%macce to 12 months by syntax score tertileintermediate scores (23-32) lm subset mean baselinesyntax scorecabg27.2 3.0taxus 27.0 2.7061220400months since allocationcumulative e
15、vent rate (%)taxus (n=135)cabg (n=150)p=0.008*25.3%12.9%event rate 1.5 se, *fisher exact testcalculated by core laboratory; itt populationmacce to 12 months by syntax score tertilehigh scores (33) left main subsetmean baselinesyntax scorecabg42.1 7.6taxus 43.8 9.1itt populationtaxus*cabg(n=705)(n=91
16、)(n=138)(n=218)(n=258)p=0.44p=1.0p=0.27p=0.29p=0.42patients (%)taxus*cabg(n=705)(n=91)(n=138)(n=218)(n=258)patients (%)p=0.29p=1.0p=0.72p=0.57p=0.11061220400months since allocationcumulative event rate (%)p0.001*19.1%11.2%itt populationevent rate 1.5 se, *fisher exact testtaxus (n=546)cabg (n=549)ca
17、bgtaxus*p=0.393 vessel disease*n=34n=43*per protocol and itt populations had same outcomepatients (%)syntax score2212-month macce, %syntax scorekm estimates, event rate 1.5 se; *chi square test; raw syntax score for illustrative purposes onlyrct itt pts; site-reported datasyntax score23-32syntax sco
18、re33taxus* (n=903)cabg (n=897)composite of death or myocardial infarctionno./total (%)odds ratio (95% cl)favors routineinvasivefavors selectiveinvasiveor, 0.820.72-0.93p0.0010.11.010ccs class iii-iv anginarehospitalizationodds ratio (95% cl)0.11.0100.11.010or, 0.66 0.60-0.72,p0.001favors routineinva
19、sivefavors selectiveinvasivep=0.0002from tct 2006des - the good, the bad, and the ugly!bmsdeslate stentthrombosisbmsdeslate loss = 0eosgiant cellsi-v overall (i-squared = 0.0%, p = 0.918)basket (ses only)taxus iihaamu-stentsevilleortolani et altaxus ive-siriusstudy iddiabetesprison iistrategyravelse
20、s-smarttaxus vtyphoonmission!scorpiussesamid+l overallpassionc-siriuspache et alsirius0.97 (0.81, 1.15)0.82 (0.37, 1.84)1.61 (0.57, 4.53)2.00 (0.63, 6.38)1.35 (0.23, 7.78)2.00 (0.19, 21.38)0.89 (0.63, 1.25)1.08 (0.25, 2.24)es (95% ci)1.44 (0.48, 4.33)0.50 (0.09, 2.67)0.84 (0.36, 1.96)1.75 (0.73, 4.1
21、6)0.21 (0.02, 1.71)0.97 (0.57, 1.65)1.01 (0.38, 2.65)0.48 (0.09, 2.59)1.28 (0.35, 4.61)0.43 (0.11, 1.63)0.97 (0.81, 1.15)0.70 (0.36, 1.36)0.68 (0.11, 4.04)1.40 (0.45, 4.35)1.02 (0.67, 1.54)100.004.802.872.301.000.5526.292.57(i-v)2.551.074.304.080.6210.923.271.09weight1.861.706.990.952.4017.82%0.97 (
22、0.81, 1.15)0.82 (0.37, 1.84)1.61 (0.57, 4.53)2.00 (0.63, 6.38)1.35 (0.23, 7.78)2.00 (0.19, 21.38)0.89 (0.63, 1.25)1.08 (0.25, 2.24)es (95% ci)1.44 (0.48, 4.33)0.50 (0.09, 2.67)0.84 (0.36, 1.96)1.75 (0.73, 4.16)0.21 (0.02, 1.71)0.97 (0.57, 1.65)1.01 (0.38, 2.65)0.48 (0.09, 2.59)1.28 (0.35, 4.61)0.43
23、(0.11, 1.63)0.97 (0.81, 1.15)0.70 (0.36, 1.36)0.68 (0.11, 4.04)1.40 (0.45, 4.35)1.02 (0.67, 1.54)100.004.802.872.301.000.5526.292.57(i-v)2.551.074.304.080.6210.923.271.09weight1.861.706.990.952.4017.82% 1.1110favors bmsestimate (95% ci) weight (%)0.97 (0.81,1.15)0.97 (0.81,1.15), p=0.72random effect
24、s*fixed effects (i2=0.0%)favors desmean f/u 2.9 yrsajay j. kirtane and gregg w. stone, 2008i-v overall (i-squared = 0.0%, p = 0.927)ortolani et altaxus v - simpled+l overalltaxus ivpache et alc-siriuse-siriussiriustaxus iistudy idravelscorpius1.05 (0.84, 1.30)2.00 (0.19, 21.38)1.09 (0.53, 2.22)1.05
25、(0.84, 1.30)0.89 (0.63, 1.25)1.40 (0.45, 4.35)0.68 (0.11, 4.04)1.08 (0.25, 2.24)1.02 (0.67, 1.54)1.61 (0.57, 4.53)es (95% ci)1.75 (0.73, 4.16)1.28 (0.35, 4.61)100.000.859.2040.203.67%1.453.9327.254.39(i-v)6.232.84weight 1.1110favors desfavors bmsestimate (95% ci) weight (%)1.05 (0.84,1.30)1.05 (0.84
26、,1.30), p=0.69random effects*fixed effects (i2=0.0%)mean f/u 4.0 yrsajay j. kirtane and gregg w. stone, 2008i-v overall (i-squared = 0.0%, p = 0.798)haamu-stentpassionprison iimission!diabetesbasket (ses only)sevilled+l overallses-smartstrategytaxus v - complexstudy idsesamityphoon0.84 (0.62, 1.13)2
27、.00 (0.63, 6.38)0.70 (0.36, 1.36)0.50 (0.09, 2.67)0.48 (0.09, 2.59)1.44 (0.48, 4.33)0.82 (0.37, 1.84)1.35 (0.23, 7.78)0.84 (0.62, 1.13)0.21 (0.02, 1.71)0.84 (0.36, 1.96)0.84 (0.38, 1.84)es (95% ci)0.43 (0.11, 1.63)1.01 (0.38, 2.65)100.006.6420.16weight3.103.167.3613.84%2.871.8012.4014.32(i-v)4.909.4
28、4 1.1110favors desfavors bmsestimate (95% ci) weight (%)0.84 (0.62,1.13)0.84 (0.62,1.13), p=0.24random effects*fixed effects (i2=0.0%)mean f/u 1.5 yrsajay j. kirtane and gregg w. stone, 2008note: weights are from random effects analysisd+l overall (i-squared = 70.9%, p = 0.000)asan korea (adjusted)s
29、martmelbournemassachusetts (matched)washington hosp center (matched)multicenter svg (adjusted)i-v overallrotterdam off-labelstent (adjusted)acuity (from rct)real (adjusted)liverpool (matched)wake forest (adjusted)mayo ffr substudycedars acute mighost (adjusted)sussex elderlyeraci iii (from rct)ny st
30、ate (adjusted, unmatched)ontario (matched)study idmidas (adjusted)restemmcmaster stemi (adjusted)germany metabolic syndromewestern denmark (adjusted)arts ii (from rct)descover (unadjusted)northern new england (adjusted)scaar (adjusted)italian diabetic multivessel (adjusted)nhlbi (off label, adjusted
31、)nhlbi (on label, adjusted)0.78 (0.71, 0.86)0.60 (0.46, 0.79)0.59 (0.48, 0.71)0.67 (0.23, 1.94)0.79 (0.71, 0.89)1.16 (0.78, 1.75)1.33 (0.47, 3.76)0.81 (0.78, 0.85)0.98 (0.85, 1.13)0.69 (0.55, 0.87)0.63 (0.49, 0.82)0.83 (0.70, 0.98)0.45 (0.24, 0.84)0.72 (0.55, 0.95)1.00 (0.21, 4.75)0.82 (0.37, 1.83)0
32、.55 (0.36, 0.83)0.72 (0.30, 1.72)1.18 (0.54, 2.58)0.84 (0.72, 0.97)0.71 (0.59, 0.84)es (95% ci)0.66 (0.59, 0.74)0.73 (0.51, 1.05)0.17 (0.03, 0.97)1.47 (0.65, 3.35)1.00 (0.86, 1.17)0.74 (0.41, 1.35)0.53 (0.35, 0.80)0.51 (0.26, 1.00)1.03 (0.94, 1.14)1.22 (0.36, 4.10)0.94 (0.64, 1.38)1.47 (0.87, 2.48)1
33、00.00weight4.355.230.716.153.020.745.854.834.505.551.70%4.310.351.162.911.001.205.775.46(d+l)6.143.400.281.115.721.832.951.536.300.563.192.200.78 (0.71, 0.86)0.60 (0.46, 0.79)0.59 (0.48, 0.71)0.67 (0.23, 1.94)0.79 (0.71, 0.89)1.16 (0.78, 1.75)1.33 (0.47, 3.76)0.81 (0.78, 0.85)0.98 (0.85, 1.13)0.69 (
34、0.55, 0.87)0.63 (0.49, 0.82)0.83 (0.70, 0.98)0.45 (0.24, 0.84)0.72 (0.55, 0.95)1.00 (0.21, 4.75)0.82 (0.37, 1.83)0.55 (0.36, 0.83)0.72 (0.30, 1.72)1.18 (0.54, 2.58)0.84 (0.72, 0.97)0.71 (0.59, 0.84)es (95% ci)0.66 (0.59, 0.74)0.73 (0.51, 1.05)0.17 (0.03, 0.97)1.47 (0.65, 3.35)1.00 (0.86, 1.17)0.74 (
35、0.41, 1.35)0.53 (0.35, 0.80)0.51 (0.26, 1.00)1.03 (0.94, 1.14)1.22 (0.36, 4.10)0.94 (0.64, 1.38)1.47 (0.87, 2.48)100.00weight4.355.230.716.153.020.745.854.834.505.551.70%4.310.351.162.911.001.205.775.46(d+l)6.143.400.281.115.721.832.951.536.300.563.192.20 1.1110favors bmsestimate (95% ci) weight (%)
36、0.78 (0.71,0.86), p0.0010.81 (0.78,0.85)favors des*random effects (i2=71%)fixed effectsmean f/u 2.5 yrsajay j. kirtane and gregg w. stone, 2008note: weights are from random effects analysisd+l overall (i-squared = 75.9%, p = 0.000)northern new england (adjusted)ghost (adjusted)i-v overallmulticenter
37、 svg (adjusted)ny state (adjusted, unmatched)stent (adjusted)western denmark (adjusted)liverpool (matched)wake forest (adjusted)real (adjusted)study idmassachusetts (matched)italian diabetic multivessel (adjusted)midas (adjusted)asan korea (adjusted)nhlbi (on label, adjusted)mcmaster stemi (adjusted
38、)ontario (matched)washington hosp center (matched)nhlbi (off label, adjusted)scaar (adjusted)0.79 (0.71, 0.89)0.51 (0.26, 1.00)0.55 (0.36, 0.83)0.82 (0.79, 0.86)1.33 (0.47, 3.76)0.84 (0.72, 0.97)0.69 (0.55, 0.87)1.00 (0.86, 1.17)0.45 (0.24, 0.84)0.72 (0.55, 0.95)0.83 (0.70, 0.98)es (95% ci)0.79 (0.7
39、1, 0.89)1.22 (0.36, 4.10)0.66 (0.59, 0.74)0.60 (0.46, 0.79)1.47 (0.87, 2.48)0.17 (0.03, 0.97)0.71 (0.59, 0.84)1.16 (0.78, 1.75)0.94 (0.64, 1.38)1.03 (0.94, 1.14)100.002.154.111.048.18%6.838.102.406.097.86(d+l)8.710.788.716.143.100.40weight7.724.264.508.930.79 (0.71, 0.89)0.51 (0.26, 1.00)0.55 (0.36, 0.83)0.82 (0.79, 0.86)1.33 (0.47, 3.76)0.84 (0.72, 0.97)0.69 (0.55, 0.87)1.00 (0.86, 1.17)0.45 (0.24, 0.84)0.72 (
溫馨提示
- 1. 本站所有資源如無(wú)特殊說(shuō)明,都需要本地電腦安裝OFFICE2007和PDF閱讀器。圖紙軟件為CAD,CAXA,PROE,UG,SolidWorks等.壓縮文件請(qǐng)下載最新的WinRAR軟件解壓。
- 2. 本站的文檔不包含任何第三方提供的附件圖紙等,如果需要附件,請(qǐng)聯(lián)系上傳者。文件的所有權(quán)益歸上傳用戶所有。
- 3. 本站RAR壓縮包中若帶圖紙,網(wǎng)頁(yè)內(nèi)容里面會(huì)有圖紙預(yù)覽,若沒(méi)有圖紙預(yù)覽就沒(méi)有圖紙。
- 4. 未經(jīng)權(quán)益所有人同意不得將文件中的內(nèi)容挪作商業(yè)或盈利用途。
- 5. 人人文庫(kù)網(wǎng)僅提供信息存儲(chǔ)空間,僅對(duì)用戶上傳內(nèi)容的表現(xiàn)方式做保護(hù)處理,對(duì)用戶上傳分享的文檔內(nèi)容本身不做任何修改或編輯,并不能對(duì)任何下載內(nèi)容負(fù)責(zé)。
- 6. 下載文件中如有侵權(quán)或不適當(dāng)內(nèi)容,請(qǐng)與我們聯(lián)系,我們立即糾正。
- 7. 本站不保證下載資源的準(zhǔn)確性、安全性和完整性, 同時(shí)也不承擔(dān)用戶因使用這些下載資源對(duì)自己和他人造成任何形式的傷害或損失。
最新文檔
- 示范學(xué)校德育工作匯報(bào)
- 補(bǔ)光干預(yù)對(duì)紅豆杉生長(zhǎng)周期的影響機(jī)制研究
- 外出授課試講管理辦法
- 辦公修舊利廢管理辦法
- 500KV輸電線路鐵塔斜柱斜面施工詳解
- 崗山窯文化遺產(chǎn)活化促進(jìn)地方農(nóng)業(yè)產(chǎn)業(yè)發(fā)展模式探索
- 民警十二分制管理辦法
- 樓宇智能化PLC控制系統(tǒng)的設(shè)計(jì)與實(shí)現(xiàn)
- 生物多樣性保護(hù)與恢復(fù)機(jī)制-洞察及研究
- 地方國(guó)資集團(tuán)投資能力提升路徑研究
- GB/T 5163-2006燒結(jié)金屬材料(不包括硬質(zhì)合金)可滲性燒結(jié)金屬材料密度、含油率和開孔率的測(cè)定
- GB/T 17989.2-2020控制圖第2部分:常規(guī)控制圖
- 建設(shè)項(xiàng)目安全設(shè)施‘三同時(shí)’課件
- 2022語(yǔ)文課程標(biāo)準(zhǔn):“語(yǔ)言文字積累與梳理”任務(wù)群解讀及實(shí)操
- DB15T 489-2019 石油化學(xué)工業(yè)建設(shè)工程技術(shù)資料管理規(guī)范
- 內(nèi)蒙古自治區(qū)通遼市各縣區(qū)鄉(xiāng)鎮(zhèn)行政村村莊村名居民村民委員會(huì)明細(xì)及行政區(qū)劃代碼
- 螺旋溜槽安裝標(biāo)準(zhǔn)工藝
- 2022年人教版六年級(jí)下冊(cè)語(yǔ)文期末考試卷
- 《土地開發(fā)整理項(xiàng)目預(yù)算編制暫行辦法》
- 安徽省評(píng)議公告的中小學(xué)教輔材料零售價(jià)格表
- 德龍自卸車合格證掃描件(原圖)
評(píng)論
0/150
提交評(píng)論