空難調(diào)查報(bào)告澳洲航空32班機(jī)

1、ATSB TRANSPORT SAFETY REPORTAviation Occurrence Investigation AO-2010-089PreliminaryIn-flight uncontained engine failureoverhead Batam Island, Indonesia4 November 2010VH-OQAAirbus A380-842ATSB TRANSPORT SAFETY REPORTAviation Occurrence Investigation AO-2010-089PreliminaryIn-flight uncontained engine

2、 failure overhead Batam Island, Indonesia 4 November 2010VH-OQAAirbus A380-842Released in accordance with section 25 of the Transport Safety Investigation Act 2003- iii -Published by: Postal address: Office location:Telephone:Australian Transport Safety Bureau PO Box 967. Civic Square ACT 260862 Nor

3、thbourne Ave, Canberra City, Australian Capital Territory, 2601 1800 020 616, from overseas +61 2 6257 4150Accident and incident notification: 1800 011 034 (24 hours)02 6247 3117, from overseas +61 2 6247 3117 .auFacsi:Internet:© Commonwealth of Australia 2010.This work is copyr

4、ight. In the interests of enhancing the value of the information contained in this publication you may copy, download, display, print, reproduce and distribute this material in unaltered form (retaining this notice). However, copyright in the material obtained from other agencies, private individual

5、s or organisations, belongs to those agencies, individuals or organisations. Where you want to use their material you will need to contact them directly.Subject to the provisions of the Copyright Act 1968, you must not make any other use of the material in this publication unless you have the permis

6、sion of the Australian Transport Safety Bureau.Please direct requests for further information or authorisation to: Commonwealth Copyright Administration, Copyright Law BranchAttorney-Generals Department, Robert Garran Offices, National Circuit, Barton, ACT 2600ISBN and formal report title: see Docum

7、ent retrieval information on page vii- iv -CONTENTSTHE AUSTRALIAN TRANSPORT SAFETY BUREAUviiiTERMINOLOGY USED IN THIS REPORTixABBREVIATIONSxFACTUAL INFORMATION1Investigation overview1History of the flight2The engine failure3Flight crew response5Planning the recovery and landing6The approach and land

8、ing7Securing and exiting the aircraft8Injuries tos9nel information9Aircraft information10Damage to the aircraft10Engine information13Engine description13Damage to the No 2 engine15Other damage17Search for engine components18Meteorological information19Aerodrome information20Fire.20Tests and research

9、20Engine No 2 component examination20Recorded information22Crash-protected flight recorders22Flight data recorder23Cockpit voice recorder23Non-mandatory data recording systems24Recovery of the non-mandatory recorded information25Sequence of events drawn from the recorded data26SAFETY ACTION29Qantas3

10、0- v -Rolls-Royce plc31European Aviation Safety Agency32Airbus33ONGOING INVESTIGATION ACTIVITIES35APPENDIX A: FLIGHT RECORDER INFORMATION37APPENDIX B: SOURCES AND SUBMISSIONS43- vi -DOCUMENT RETRIEVAL INFORMATIONReport No.Publication dateNo. of pages51ISBN978-1-74251-118-4AO-2010-089November 2010Pub

11、lication titleIn-flight uncontained engine failure - overhead Batam Island, Indonesia - 4 November 2010 VH-OQA, Airbus A380-842Prepared ByAustralian Transport Safety BureauPO Box 967, Civic Square ACT 2608 AustraliaReference NumberATSB-Nov10/ATSB149AcknowledgementsFigure 2:EarthFigure 6: Rolls-Royce

12、 plc Figure 10: AirbusAbstractOn 4 November 2010, at 0157 Universal Coordinated Time (UTC), an Airbus A380 aircraft, registered VH-OQA (OQA), being operated as Qantas flight 32, departed from runway 20 centre (20C) at Changi Airport, Singapore for Sydney, New South Wales. On board the aircraft were

13、five flight crew, 24 cabincrew and 440 passengers (a total of 469s on board).Following a normal takeoff, the crew retracted the landing gear and flaps. The crew reported that, while maintaining 250 kts in the climb and passing 7,000 ft above mean sea level, they heard two almost coincident loud bang

14、s, followed shortly after by indications of a failure of the No 2 engine.The crew advised Singapore Air Traffic Control of the situation and were provided with radar vectors to a holding pattern. The crew undertook a series of actions before returning the aircraft to land at Singapore. There were no

15、 reported injuries to the crew or passengers on the aircraft. There were reportsof minor injuries to twos on Batam Island, Indonesia.A subsequent examination of the aircraft indicated that the No 2 engine had sustained an uncontained failure of the Intermediate Pressure (IP) turbine disc. Sections o

16、f the liberated disc penetrated the left wing and the left wing-to-fuselage fairing, resulting in structural and systems damage to the aircraft.As a result of this occurrence, a number of safety actions were immediately undertaken by Qantas, Airbus, Rolls-Royce plc and the European Aviation Safety A

17、gency. On 1 December 2010, the ATSB issued a safety recommendation to Rolls-Royce plc in respect of the Trent 900 series engine high pressure/intermediate pressure bearing structure oil feed stub pipes. In addition, the Civil Aviation Safety Authority issued a Regulation 38 maintenance direction tha

18、t addressed the immediate safety of flight concerns in respect of Qantas A380 operations with the Trent 900 series engine. On 2 December 2010, Qantas advised that the requirements of Rolls-Royce plc Service Bulletin RB211-72-G595 would take place within the next 24 hours on engines in place on A380

19、aircraft currently in service, and before further flight on engines on aircraft not yet returned to service.The investigation is continuing.- vii -THE AUSTRALIAN TRANSPORT SAFETY BUREAUThe Australian Transport Safety Bureau (ATSB) is an independent Commonwealth Government statutory agency. The Burea

20、u is governed by a Commission and is entirely separate from transport regulators, policy makers and service providers. The ATSB's function is to improve safety and public confidence in the aviation, marine and rail modes of transport through excellence in: independent investigation of transport

21、accidents and other safety occurrences; safety data recording, analysis and research; fostering safety awareness, knowledge and action.The ATSB is responsible for investigating accidents and other transport safety matters involving civil aviation, marine and rail operations in Australia that fall wi

22、thin Commonwealth jurisdiction, as well as participating in overseas investigations involving Australian registered aircraft and ships. A primary concern is the safety of commercial transport, with particular regard to fare-paying passenger operations.The ATSB performs its functions in accordance wi

23、th the provisions of the Transport Safety Investigation Act 2003 and Regulations and, where applicable, relevant international agreements.Purpose of safety investigationsThe object of a safety investigation is to identify and reduce safety-related risk. ATSB investigations determine and communicate

24、the safety factors related to the transport safety matter being investigated. The terms the ATSB uses to refer to key safety and risk concepts are set out in the next section: Terminology Used in this Report.It is not a function of the ATSB to apportion blame or determine liability. At the same time

25、, an investigation report must include factual material of sufficient weight to support the analysis and findings. At all times the ATSB endeavours to balance the use of material that could imply adverse comment with the need to properly explain what happened, and why, in a fair and unbiased manner.

26、Developing safety actionCentral to the ATSBs investigation of transport safety matters is the early identification of safety issues in the transport environment. The ATSB prefers to encourage the relevant organisation(s) to initiate proactive safety action that addresses safety issues. Nevertheless,

27、 the ATSB may use its power to make a formal safety recommendation either during or at the end of an investigation, depending on the level of risk associated with a safety issue and the extent of corrective action undertaken by the relevant organisation.When safety recommendations are issued, they f

28、ocus on clearly describing the safety issue of concern, rather than providing instructions or opinions on a preferred method of corrective action. As with equivalent overseas organisations, the ATSB has no power to enforce the implementation of its recommendations. It is a matter for the body to whi

29、ch an ATSB recommendation is directed to assess the costs and benefits of any particular means of addressing a safety issue.When the ATSB issues a safety recommendation to a, organisation or agency, theymust provide a written response within 90 days. That response must indicate whether theyaccept th

30、e recommendation, any reasons for not accepting part or all of the recommendation, and details of any proposed safety action to give effect to the recommendation.The ATSB can also issue safety advisory notices suggesting that an organisation or an industry sector consider a safety issue and take act

31、ion where it believes it appropriate. There is no requirement for a formal response to an advisory notice, although the ATSB will publish any response it receives.- viii -TERMINOLOGY USED IN THIS REPORTOccurrence: accident or incident.Safety factor: an event or condition that increases safety risk.

32、In other words, it is something that, if it occurred in the future, would increase the likelihood of an occurrence, and/or the severity of the adverse consequences associated with an occurrence. Safety factors include the occurrence events (e.g. engine failure, signal passed at danger, grounding), i

33、ndividual actions (e.g. errors and violations), local conditions, current risk controls and organisational influences.Contributing safety factor: a safety factor that, had it not occurred or existed at the time of an occurrence, then either: (a) the occurrence would probably not have occurred; or (b

34、) the adverse consequences associated with the occurrence would probably not have occurred or have been as serious, or (c) another contributing safety factor would probably not have occurred or existed.Other safety factor: a safety factor identified during an occurrence investigation which did not m

35、eet the definition of contributing safety factor but was still considered to be important to communicate in an investigation report in the interests of improved transport safety.Other key finding: any finding, other than that associated with safety factors,considered important to include in an inves

36、tigation report. Such findinay resolveambiguity or controversy, describe possible scenarios or safety factors when firmsafety factor findings were not able to be made, or note events or conditions which saved the day or played an important role in reducing the risk associated with anoccurrence.Safet

37、y issue: a safety factor that (a) can reasonably be regarded as having the potential to adversely affect the safety of future operations, and (b) is a characteristic of an organisation or a system, rather than a characteristic of a specific individual, or characteristic of an operational environment

38、 at a specific point in time.Risk level: The ATSBs assessment of the risk level associated with a safety issue is noted in the Findings section of the investigation report. It reflects the risk level as it existed at the time of the occurrence. That risk level may subsequently have been reduced as a

39、 result of safety actions taken by individuals or organisations during the course of an investigation.Safety issues are broadly classified in terms of their level of risk as follows:Critical safety issue: associated with an intolerable level of risk and generally leading to the immediate issue of a

40、safety recommendation unless corrective safety action has already been taken.Significant safety issue: associated with a risk level regarded as acceptable only if it is kept as low as reasonably practicable. The ATSB may issue a safety recommendation or a safety advisory notice if it assesses that f

41、urther safety action may be practicable.Minor safety issue: associated with a broadly acceptable level of risk, although the ATSB may sometimes issue a safety advisory notice.Safety action: the steps taken or proposed to be taken by a response to a safety issue., organisation or agency in- ix -ABBRE

42、VIATIONSAAIB ACARS ACMS ANSU ATSBBEAAir Accident Investigation Bureau of SingaporeAircraft communications and automatic reporting system Aircraft conditioning monitoring systemAircraft network server unit Australian Transport Safety BureauFrench Bureau dEnquêtes et dAnalyses pour la sécuri

43、té de laviation civileAustralian Civil Aviation Safety Authority Cockpit voice recorderElectronic centralized aircraft monitor Flight data recorderInternational Civil Aviation Organization Landing distance performance applicationIndonesian National Transportation Safety Committee Quick access r

44、ecorderSmart ACMS recorderUnited Kingdom Air Accidents Investigation Branch Universal coordinated timeVirtual digital ACMS recorderWireless digital ACMS recorderCASA CVR ECAM FDR ICAO LDPA NTSC QAR SARUK AAIB UTC VDARWDAR- x -FACTUAL INFORMATIONThe information contained in this preliminary report is

45、 derived from the initial investigation of the occurrence. Readers are cautioned that there is the possibility that new evidence may become available that alters the circumstances as depicted in the report.Investigation overviewOn 4 November 2010, the Australian Transport Safety Bureau (ATSB) was no

46、tified of an engine failure on a Qantas Airbus A380 aircraft over Batam Island, Indonesia and that the aircraft had returned to its departure airport in Singapore (Figure 1).The investigation of aircraft accidents and incidents is conducted in accordance with Annex 13 to the Convention on Internatio

47、nal Civil Aviation, Aircraft Accident and Incident Investigation. As the engine failure occurred over Indonesian territory, the responsibility for instituting and conducting the investigation rested withIndonesthe State of Occurrence. However, Annex 13 permits the investigationto be delegated to ano

48、ther State by mutual arrangement. Following discussionsbetween the Indonesian National Transportation Safety Committee (NTSC) and the ATSB, the NTSC delegated the investigation to the ATSB.The ATSB initiated an investigation under the Australian Transport SafetyInvestigation Act 2003 on 4 November 2

49、010 and, in accordance with the provisions of Annex 13, appointed Accredited Representatives from the United Kingdom Air Accidents Investigation Branch (UK AAIB), the French Bureau dEnquêtes et dAnalyses pour la sécurité de laviation civile (BEA), the Air Accident Investigation Bureau

50、 of Singapore (AAIB) and the Indonesian NTSC. Advisors to the Accredited Representatives were also appointed from the aircraft and engine manufacturers, Airbus and Rolls-Royce plc respectively, and from the European Aviation Safety Agency (EASA). A number of Observers were also appointed from variou

51、s agencies, including from the Australian Civil Aviation Safety Authority and the Civil Aviation Authority of Singapore.- 1-Figure 1: VH-OQA showing the damaged No 2 engineHistory of the flightOn 4 November 2010, at 0157 Universal Coordinated Time (UTC)1, an Airbus A380 aircraft, registered VH-OQA (

52、OQA), being operated as Qantas flight 32, departed from runway 20 centre (20C) at Changi Airport, Singapore for Sydney, New South Wales. On board the aircraft were five flight crew, 24 cabin crew and440 passengers (a total of 469The flight crew was comprised of:s on board).the aircraft Captain, as p

53、ilot in command (PIC) the First Officer (FO), acting as copilota Second Officer (SO)a second Captain, who was undergoing training as a Check Captain (CC)a Supervising Check Captain (SCC), who was overseeing the training of the CC.The flight included a route check on the PIC by the trainee CC under t

54、he supervision of the SCC. The pre-flight briefing included tracking to the east of the active Merapi volcano in Indonesia and the PIC added 2 t of fuel to allow for any manoeuvring around the volcanic area.1The 24-hour clock is used in this report to describe the time of day in Universal Coordinate

55、d Time (UTC), as particular events occurred.- 2 -The PIC was the handling pilot for the flight and was seated in the forward left seat. The FO was seated in the forward right seat, with the CC seated in the centre observers seat. The SCC and the SO were seated in the right and left rear observer sea

56、ts respectively. The following account is primarily based on the flight crews recollection of the events.The engine failureFollowing a normal takeoff, the crew retracted the landing gear and flaps. The crew reported that, while maintaining 250 kts in the climb and passing 7,000 ft above mean sea lev

57、el (AMSL), they heard two, almost coincident loud bangs. The PIC immediately selected altitude and heading hold on the autopilot control panel, and the FO started his chronometer. The crew reported a slight yaw and that the aircraft immediately levelled off in accordance with the selection of altitu

58、de hold. The PIC expected the autothrust system to reduce power on the engines to maintain 250 kts as the aircraft levelled off; however, it became clear that the autothrust system was no longer active, so the PIC manually retarded the thrust levers to control the aircrafts speed. Both flight directors remained available to the crew.At the same time, the Electronic Centralised Aircraft Monitor (ECAM)2