供應(yīng)商選擇工具_(dá)第1頁(yè)
供應(yīng)商選擇工具_(dá)第2頁(yè)
供應(yīng)商選擇工具_(dá)第3頁(yè)
供應(yīng)商選擇工具_(dá)第4頁(yè)
供應(yīng)商選擇工具_(dá)第5頁(yè)
已閱讀5頁(yè),還剩3頁(yè)未讀 繼續(xù)免費(fèi)閱讀

下載本文檔

版權(quán)說(shuō)明:本文檔由用戶提供并上傳,收益歸屬內(nèi)容提供方,若內(nèi)容存在侵權(quán),請(qǐng)進(jìn)行舉報(bào)或認(rèn)領(lǐng)

文檔簡(jiǎn)介

1、SELECTION TOOL選擇供應(yīng)商的工具SUPPLIER INFORMATION供應(yīng)商信息:Supplier name: 供應(yīng)商名稱(chēng):Phone: 電話:Fax: 傳真:Corporate headquarters address: 總部地址:Supplier web page address: 網(wǎng)址:Contact name/title: 聯(lián)系人:Phone: 電話:Fax: 傳真:Contact address: 聯(lián)系地址:Contact email: EMAIL:Other important information: 其他重要信息:SQE ANALYSISSQE分析:Weight比

2、重Supplier A供應(yīng)商ASupplier B供應(yīng)商BSupplier C供應(yīng)商CRTS ReadinessSuppliers Outgoing Quality Level/DPPM供應(yīng)商出貨品質(zhì)水平/DPPMSuppliers Customers Line Reject Rate供應(yīng)商客戶的廠內(nèi)不良率:Suppliers Customers Field Reject Rate供應(yīng)商客戶的市場(chǎng)不良率:Forecasted LRR Customer預(yù)估的客戶產(chǎn)線不良率Forecasted IFIR CustomerCUSTOMER的預(yù)期初始市場(chǎng)不良率Quality System品質(zhì)系統(tǒng):Qu

3、ality Resources品質(zhì)資源:TOTAL (weighted)總計(jì)100%SQE WORKSHEETSQE工作表:RTS READINESSSCORE: 分?jǐn)?shù):Detail:How soon may the product be successfully introduced into Customer manufacturing, and does the compatibility of the design meet Customers needs?說(shuō)明: 產(chǎn)品需要多長(zhǎng)時(shí)間才能成功導(dǎo)入CUSTOMER生產(chǎn),設(shè)計(jì)能力是否可以滿足CUSTOMER需求?Scoring:1Repres

4、ents high risk to schedule and quality OR not compatible分?jǐn)?shù): 時(shí)間及品質(zhì)具有高風(fēng)險(xiǎn)性,配合度差2 Represents medium risk to schedule or quality; compatible時(shí)間及品質(zhì)具有中等風(fēng)險(xiǎn)性,配合度好3 Represents low risk to schedule or quality; compatible時(shí)間及品質(zhì)具有低風(fēng)險(xiǎn)性,配合度好4 No risk to schedule or quality; compatible時(shí)間及品質(zhì)無(wú)風(fēng)險(xiǎn)性,配合度好Comments備注:SUPPLIE

5、RS OUTGOING QUALITY LEVEL/DPPMSCORE:供應(yīng)商出貨品質(zhì)等級(jí)/DPPMDetail:(Suppliers history)說(shuō)明 供應(yīng)商的歷史狀況Supplier should be measuring DPPM rates, analyzing/categorizing reasons for failures, and taking appropriate corrective actions. 供應(yīng)商能夠計(jì)算出不良率,分析失效原因并加以分類(lèi),并能夠剔除有效的改善對(duì)策。Scoring:1Supplier does not measure DPPM rate分?jǐn)?shù):

6、 供應(yīng)商無(wú)法計(jì)算出不良率2 Supplier measures DPPM rate, however, there is no analysis (pareto) or corrective action供應(yīng)商能夠計(jì)算出不良率,但無(wú)法提供分析及改善對(duì)策。3 Supplier measures DPPM rate and performs analysis (pareto), however, no corrective action is taken供應(yīng)商能夠計(jì)算出不良率,能夠剔除原因分析,但是無(wú)法提供改善對(duì)策。4 Supplier measures DPPM rate, performs a

7、nalysis (pareto) and has effective corrective action system供應(yīng)商能夠計(jì)算出不良率,提供原因分析及有效的改善對(duì)策。GENERAL DPPM INFORMATION: 主要的市場(chǎng)不良資訊:a)Agree to Customers DPPM goals: o Yes, goals are _ o No 是否達(dá)到CUSTOMER不良率目標(biāo): o是,目標(biāo)是: o否b)Plan to support achievement of DPPM goals: o Yes (plan attached) o Plan promised by _ 是否有確

8、保達(dá)到不良率目標(biāo)的計(jì)劃: o是(相關(guān)計(jì)劃) o 計(jì)劃確定人:Comments備注:SUPPLIERS CUSTOMERS LINE REJECT RATESSCORE供應(yīng)商客戶的廠內(nèi)不良率 分?jǐn)?shù):Detail:(Suppliers customers history)_ (Customers current goal)說(shuō)明: (供應(yīng)商的歷史狀況) CUSTOMER 的現(xiàn)行目標(biāo)Scoring:1Suppliers customers LRR is 2 times worse than Customers current goal分?jǐn)?shù): 供應(yīng)商客戶的長(zhǎng)期不良率超過(guò)CUSTOMER現(xiàn)行目標(biāo)值的2倍2

9、 Suppliers customers LRR is greater than Customers current goal, yet less than 2 times greater供應(yīng)商客戶的長(zhǎng)期不良率超過(guò)CUSTOMER現(xiàn)行目標(biāo)值,但是小于其2倍3 Suppliers customers LRR is approximately equal to Customers current goal供應(yīng)商客戶的長(zhǎng)期不良率基本與CUSTOMER現(xiàn)行目標(biāo)一致4 Suppliers customers LRR is better than Customers current goal供應(yīng)商客戶的長(zhǎng)

10、期不良率優(yōu)于CUSTOMER現(xiàn)行目標(biāo)值SUPPLIERS CUSTOMERS FIELD REJECT RATESSCORE:供應(yīng)商客戶的市場(chǎng)不良率 分?jǐn)?shù):Detail:(Suppliers customers history)_ (Customers current goal)說(shuō)明: 供應(yīng)商客戶的歷史狀況 CUSTOMER現(xiàn)行目標(biāo)Scoring:1Suppliers customers FIR is 2 times worse than Customers current goal分?jǐn)?shù): 供應(yīng)商客戶的市場(chǎng)不良率超過(guò)CUSTOMER現(xiàn)行目標(biāo)值的2倍2 Suppliers customers F

11、IR is greater than Customers current goal, yet less than 2 times greaterCUSTOMER客戶的市場(chǎng)不良率超過(guò)CUSTOMER現(xiàn)行目標(biāo),但低于其2倍3 Suppliers customers FIR is approximately equal to Customers current goal供應(yīng)商客戶的市場(chǎng)不良率基本與CUSTOMER現(xiàn)行目標(biāo)值一致4 Suppliers customers FIR is better than Customers current goal供應(yīng)商客戶的市場(chǎng)不良率優(yōu)于CUSTOMER現(xiàn)行目標(biāo)

12、值FORECASTED LRR CUSTOMERSCORE:預(yù)期的CUSTOMER產(chǎn)線不良率 分?jǐn)?shù)DETAIL:(SUPPLIERS FORECASTED)_ (CUSTOMERS CURRENT GOAL)說(shuō)明: 供應(yīng)商的預(yù)估值 CUSTOMER的現(xiàn)行目標(biāo)Scoring:1Suppliers LRR is 2 times worse than Customers current goal分?jǐn)?shù): 供應(yīng)商的產(chǎn)線不良率超過(guò)CUSTOMER現(xiàn)行目標(biāo)值的2倍2 Suppliers LRR is greater than Customers current goal, yet less than 2 t

13、imes greater供應(yīng)商的產(chǎn)線不良率超過(guò)CUSTOMER的現(xiàn)行目標(biāo)值,但低于其2倍3 Suppliers LRR is approximately equal to Customers current goal供應(yīng)商的產(chǎn)線不良率基本與CUSTOMER現(xiàn)行目標(biāo)值一致4 Suppliers LRR is better than Customers current goal供應(yīng)商的產(chǎn)線不良率優(yōu)于CUSTOMER現(xiàn)行目標(biāo)值FORECASTED IFIR CUSTOMERSCORE:預(yù)期的CUSTOMER早期市場(chǎng)不良率 分?jǐn)?shù)Detail:(Suppliers forecasted)_ (Custo

14、mers current goal)說(shuō)明: 供應(yīng)商的預(yù)估值 CUSTOMER的現(xiàn)行目標(biāo)值Scoring:1Suppliers IFIR is 2 times worse than Customers current goal分?jǐn)?shù) 供應(yīng)商的早期市場(chǎng)不良率超過(guò)CUSTOMER現(xiàn)行目標(biāo)值的2倍2 Suppliers IFIR is greater than Customers current goal, yet less than 2 times greater供應(yīng)商的早期市場(chǎng)不良率超過(guò)CUSTOMER的現(xiàn)行目標(biāo)值,但低于其2倍3 Suppliers IFIR is approximately eq

15、ual to Customers current goal供應(yīng)商的早期市場(chǎng)不良率基本于CUSTOMER現(xiàn)行目標(biāo)值一致4 Suppliers IFIR is better than Customers current goal供應(yīng)商的早期市場(chǎng)不良率優(yōu)于CUSTOMER現(xiàn)行目標(biāo)QUALITY SYSTEMSCORE:品質(zhì)系統(tǒng) 分?jǐn)?shù)Detail細(xì)則:a) ISO Certification: 1 Yes (circle one: 9001 9002) 0 Noa) ISO認(rèn)證 b) Customer Quality Systems Audit scoring ranges:b) 品質(zhì)系統(tǒng)稽核得分0L

16、ess than 70% (Not Approved)2Between 7089% (Conditionally Approved)4Between 90100% (Approved)QUALITY RESOURCES SCORE:品質(zhì)資源 分?jǐn)?shù) Detail細(xì)則:The Supplier should have a dedicated Quality Department with adequate staffing resources to attend to tactical issues and a Quality Manager with time to attend to stra

17、tegic issues. Additionally, Supplier should be willing to appoint a Joint Quality Engineer for each mfg site. 供應(yīng)商應(yīng)當(dāng)建立專(zhuān)門(mén)的品保系統(tǒng)、足夠的品保員工參與品質(zhì)問(wèn)題的解決,任命品保經(jīng)理參與公司決策,另外供應(yīng)商還要在每個(gè)制造廠任命一名JQEScoring:1Inadequate resources 系統(tǒng)不健全2 Quality staff; however, no Quality Manager有品保員工,但沒(méi)有專(zhuān)職品保經(jīng)理3 Quality Department and dedica

18、ted Quality Manager有品保員工和專(zhuān)職品保經(jīng)理4 Quality Department, Quality Manager, and willing to appoint a JQE有品保員工和專(zhuān)職品保經(jīng)理,同意任命一名JQELOCAL SUPPORT支持SCORE:Detail:Supplier capability to meet Customers “Supplier Quality Standard”細(xì)則: 供應(yīng)商目前的狀況可以滿足客戶的“SQS”Scoring:1No commitment to support and wont be ready until 3 months after First Customer Ship 第一次客

溫馨提示

  • 1. 本站所有資源如無(wú)特殊說(shuō)明,都需要本地電腦安裝OFFICE2007和PDF閱讀器。圖紙軟件為CAD,CAXA,PROE,UG,SolidWorks等.壓縮文件請(qǐng)下載最新的WinRAR軟件解壓。
  • 2. 本站的文檔不包含任何第三方提供的附件圖紙等,如果需要附件,請(qǐng)聯(lián)系上傳者。文件的所有權(quán)益歸上傳用戶所有。
  • 3. 本站RAR壓縮包中若帶圖紙,網(wǎng)頁(yè)內(nèi)容里面會(huì)有圖紙預(yù)覽,若沒(méi)有圖紙預(yù)覽就沒(méi)有圖紙。
  • 4. 未經(jīng)權(quán)益所有人同意不得將文件中的內(nèi)容挪作商業(yè)或盈利用途。
  • 5. 人人文庫(kù)網(wǎng)僅提供信息存儲(chǔ)空間,僅對(duì)用戶上傳內(nèi)容的表現(xiàn)方式做保護(hù)處理,對(duì)用戶上傳分享的文檔內(nèi)容本身不做任何修改或編輯,并不能對(duì)任何下載內(nèi)容負(fù)責(zé)。
  • 6. 下載文件中如有侵權(quán)或不適當(dāng)內(nèi)容,請(qǐng)與我們聯(lián)系,我們立即糾正。
  • 7. 本站不保證下載資源的準(zhǔn)確性、安全性和完整性, 同時(shí)也不承擔(dān)用戶因使用這些下載資源對(duì)自己和他人造成任何形式的傷害或損失。

評(píng)論

0/150

提交評(píng)論