公開盜竊論文：公然以平和方式取財行為的定性分析

1、公開盜竊論文：公然以平和方式取財行為的定性分析【中文摘要】對“公然以平和方式取財行為”定性問題是我國實 踐中處理財產(chǎn)型犯罪問題的一個難點問題。綜觀相關理論,主要有“平 和搶奪說”和“公開盜竊說”兩種觀點。這兩種觀點對我國財產(chǎn)型犯 罪的各罪構(gòu)成和區(qū)分標準進行了不同的描述，因此，對“公然以平和方 式取財行為”的定性研究具有較大的理論意義和實踐價值。本文以董 某非法占有摩托車案為研究素材，通過對這兩種學說的分析比較,以 及對搶奪罪、盜竊罪的犯罪構(gòu)成的探討，試圖為“公然以平和方式取 財行為”找到一個合適的定性,以此來解決這一難題給司法實踐所帶 來的困擾。本文除引言外共分為三個部分:第一部分,案件的基本

2、情 況。通對董某非法占有摩托車案的案由、案情進行介紹，歸納出處理 本案的三種分歧意見，即對于董某公然以平和方式非法占有他人財物 的行為，公安機關認為應構(gòu)成搶奪罪，檢察院認為應構(gòu)成詐騙罪，法院 認為應構(gòu)成盜竊罪。第二部分是對“公然以平和方式取財行為”的定 性分析。通過總結(jié)本案的三種分歧意見，筆者得出了本案的爭議焦點 為，對“公然以平和方式取財行為”應如何定性?理論上對“公然以平 和方式取財行為”的定性之爭主要集中在兩種觀點:一種是“平和搶 奪說”，另一種“公開盜竊說”。對此，筆者先對“公然以平和方式取 財行為”中“公然”和“平和方式”的內(nèi)涵進行分析，又分別探論了 搶奪罪的“暴力性”和盜竊罪的“秘

3、密性”。通過對上述兩種爭議觀 點的法理分析，筆者認為“平和搶奪說”尚存缺陷“公開盜竊說”更 具有合理性，故贊同將“公然以平和方式取財行為”歸于“盜竊行為”。 第三部分是對本案的研究結(jié)論及立法啟示。結(jié)合對“公然以平和方式 取財行為”的定性分析，本案得出了明確的定罪結(jié)論。即董某的行為 不應定性為搶奪罪,也不應定性為詐騙罪，而應定性為盜竊罪。同時， 通過對本案的研究，筆者得到了一些立法啟示。即在贊同“公開盜竊 說”的基礎上,建議把“公開盜竊”理論融入我國的刑法架構(gòu)對我國 財產(chǎn)型犯罪的區(qū)分標準進行重新界定,擴大搶奪罪中“情節(jié)特別嚴重” 的范圍，以此來完善我國的刑事立法?！居⑽恼縏he qualit

4、ative problem of “gaining poverty openly with a peaceful way is one of the difficulties in the process of dealing with property crime. According to relative theories, there are two types of opinions basically: “peaceful robbing and “public theft” . The two opinions constitute standards of different

5、descriptions on the constitution and distinction of the property crime in our country. Therefore, the qualitative analysis of “gaining poverty openly with a peaceful way” exerts great theoretical significance and practical value. This essay takes Dongmou s illegal possession of a motorbike as the re

6、search material, analyzes the two opinions, and explores the constitution of the sin of robbing and theft. And then the essay makes a try to give a reasonable definition for the behavior of “gaining poverty openly”，soas to solve the problem in the judicial practice. Besides to the introduction, this

7、 essay is divided into three parts:The first part introduces the general situation of the case. Taking Dongmou s illegal possession of a motorbike for example, the essay presents the causes and the details of the case, and then leads to the three different opinions: the public security gives the rea

8、son to constitute the sin of robbing, the people s procuratorate the sin of fraud, and the court the sin of stealing.The second part is the qualitative analysis of“gaining poverty openly with a peaceful way” . By summarizing the three kinds of disagreement, the author concluded that the focus of dis

9、pute is how to define the nature of thSbehavior of gaining poverty openly” . Theoretically, the dispute as for“gaining poverty openly with apeaceful way” concentrated on two ideas: peaceful robbing” and public theft” . Thus, in this essay the author firstly makes a comparatively analysis between“ope

10、nly” and genteelly” . Then the author explores the difference of violence in the robbing crime and the secrecy in the crime of theft. Based on the legal analysis of the two mentioned disagreements, the author thinks that the opinion“peaceful robbing” still exists defects, while “public theft” sounds

11、 more reasonable. Therefore, the author agrees the exchange of “gaining poverty openly with a peaceful way” to “theft behavior” .The third part is the conclusion of the study of this case and legislation inspiration. According to the qualitative analysis of “gaining poverty openly with a peaceful wa

12、y”，this case gets to a clear conclusion: Dongmou s behavior should not be regarded as robbing instead of fraud. Meanwhile, the author can also get some legislative enlightenment through this case study. That is, on the basis of the approval of “public theft” , the author suggests merging public thef

13、t into the criminal law structure, redefining the standards of the poverty crime in our country, and expanding the sphere of robbing which is especially serious to fulfill our country s criminal legislation.【關鍵詞】公開盜竊平和搶奪詐騙【英文關鍵詞】public theft peaceful way of grabbing fraud索購全文在線加好友些：1:3 993 884&同時提供論文寫作一對一指導和論文發(fā)表委托服務【目錄】公然以平和方式取財行為的定性分析摘要 6-7Abstract7-8 引言 10-11 一、案件基本情況 11-12 （一）案由 11（二）案情簡介11（三）分歧意見11-12二、對公然以平和方式 取財行為的定性分析12-22 （一）理論上對“公然以平和方式取財 行為”的定性之爭12-151.平和搶奪說12-132.公開盜竊說13-15（二）“公然以平和方式取財行為”定性爭議觀點之評析15