GRE寫(xiě)作固定句型(摘自黃皮書(shū))_第1頁(yè)
GRE寫(xiě)作固定句型(摘自黃皮書(shū))_第2頁(yè)
GRE寫(xiě)作固定句型(摘自黃皮書(shū))_第3頁(yè)
GRE寫(xiě)作固定句型(摘自黃皮書(shū))_第4頁(yè)
GRE寫(xiě)作固定句型(摘自黃皮書(shū))_第5頁(yè)
已閱讀5頁(yè),還剩3頁(yè)未讀 繼續(xù)免費(fèi)閱讀

下載本文檔

版權(quán)說(shuō)明:本文檔由用戶提供并上傳,收益歸屬內(nèi)容提供方,若內(nèi)容存在侵權(quán),請(qǐng)進(jìn)行舉報(bào)或認(rèn)領(lǐng)

文檔簡(jiǎn)介

8/8Themerefactthat...isinsufficientevidencetoconcludethat...conclude,show,prove,imply,support,justify,validate,indicate,illustrate,demonstrate,substantiateThefactthat.doesnotprovethat(doesnotsupporttheclaimthat/doesnotensurethat/lendsnostrongsupporttotheconclusionthat)Thefactthat.doesnotnecessarilyimplythat.Theargumentfailstoruleoutthepossibilitythata.Theargumentsimplyequates.with.Theauthorassumesthat.Theauthorprovidesnoevidencethat.Thisassumptionpresentsafalsedilemma,since.arenotnecessarilymutuallyexclusivealternatives.Commonsensetellsusthat.Whilethismaybetrueinsomecases,butitisequallypossiblethat.Lackingmorespecificinformationabout.,itisimpossibletoassess.lacking,intheabsenceof,forlackofassess,evaluate,judge,determineTheeditorialfailstotakeintoaccountpossibledifferencesbetween.Whileitistruethat.thisisnottrueofeveryone.Unlesstheauthorcandemonstratethat.theauthor'sconcernabouttheseissuesIsunfounded.Theauthorfailstoconsiderandruleoutotherfactorsthatmightaccountfor.Theauthorignores/failstotakeintoaccount(consider/explain)otherlikelybenefitsof…Unless...thereisagoodchanceTheauthorispresentingafalsedilemmabyimposinganeither—orchoicebetweentwocoursesofactionthatneednotbemutuallyexclusive.Comprehensiveanalysisisnecessarytoidentifytheactualcauseof.Therefore,anydecisionaimedataddressingtheproblemof.mustbebasedonmorethoroughinvestigationtogathersufficientdatainordertonarrowdownandlocatetheactualcausesoftheproblem.Fromthesurveyquotedintheargument,however,wefindnosignofsuchproceduresforrandomsampling,andhavegoodreasontodoubtifthesampleisrepresentativeenoughtoreflectthegeneralattitudesofallworkersasawhole.Whensamplesareusedtomakegeneralclaimsaboutaparticulargroup,thesamplesshouldbecloseenoughintimetothegeneralizationtheyareusedtosupport,sothathistoricalchangeswillnotinvalidatethegeneralization.Theproblemisthatthetwosituationsarenotsimilarenoughtojustifytheanalogicaldeduction.Theargumentrestsonthegratuitous/unreasonableassumptionthat.Thearguerfailstoestablishacausalrelationshipbetween.and.Thearguer'sconclusiondependsonthequestionableassumptionthat.Thearguerfailstoprovideanyinformationconcerning.Thereasoning(assumption)that.isopentodoubt/doubtful/suspicious/unreliable/problematic/questionable/unconvincing/unfounded/unwarranted/groundless.Anotherassumptioninshortoflegitimacyis.Theargueroversimplifiestheimportanceof.Theargueroveremphasizestheimportanceof...Theconclusionreachedinthisargumentisinvalidandprobablymisleading.Theevidenceprovidedinthisargumentisnotsufficienttovalidatetheassumptionthat.Thestatisticalevidence/theresultofthesurveyuponwhichtheargumentreliesistoovaguetobeinformative.Theargumentreliesonfiguresthataretooimprecisetosupporttheconclusiondrawn.Ifthesubjectsforthestudywererandomlychosenandrepresentadiversecrosssectionofthepopulationof.,theresultswillbereliableregardlessof.Sincethearguermakesaclaimabout.ingeneral,thesampleforthesurveyshouldbeabletorepresentall.Yetwearetoldnothingaboutthewaythepollwasconductedandhowwellitrepresentedthepublicopinions.Theexamplecited,isinsufficienttowarranttheirtruthbecausethereisnoreasontobelievethatthedatadrawnfrom.isrepresentativeof.Thearguerassumesthatwhatistrueofagroupasawholeisnecessarilytrueofeachmemberofthatgroup.Theargumentassumesthatwhatistrueofgroupofpeopletakencollectivelyisalsotrueofanyindividualwithinthatgroup.Theargumentattributesacharacteristicofanindividualmemberofagrouptogroupasawhole.Thearguersupporttheconclusionbyover—generalizingfromaspecificpieceofevidence.Thearguerdrawsahastyconclusionwhichisbasedoninadequateevidenceabout.Thearguergeneralizesonthebasisofasampleconsistingofatypicalcases.Theargueruseafewexceptionalcaseasthebasisforaclaimaboutwhatistrueingeneral.Thearguerdrawsaconclusionthatisbroaderinscopethaniswarrantedbytheevidenceadvanced.Theauthorgeneralizesfromwhatistrueinoneregionofspacetowhatmustbetrueinallregionsofspace.Thearguerattemptstoextractageneralprinciplefromaspecificcase.Theargumentassumesacausalrelationshipwhereonlyacorrelationhasbeenindicated.Thearguer'sreasoninglinkingAwithBseemsreasonableonthesurface,but…ThereisnoinformationavailabletojustifyanycausalrelationshipbetweenAandB.WedonothaveanyevidencesuggestingthatAwillcauseB.Contingenciessuchas...canallleadto...Antfurtherlinkageofthesetwophenomenarequiresmoreevidenceandisnotjustifiedbythedatasofaravailable.Tofindtheexactcauseof.examinationshouldbeappliedtoallthefactoesthathavesignificantimpacton.ItdoesnotnaturallywarranttheconclusionthatAhassignificantlycontributed,andthusiscausaltoB.Thisobservedphenomenon,actually,sayslittlemorethanthatthesetwoeventsaresynchronictoeachotherandthatisall.Theevidenceitcitesisconsistentwiththealternativehypothesisthat.Theargumentignoresfactorssuchas...thatmaybemoreimportantthanAindetermingB.Sincetheapplicanthasnotadequatelyrespondedtothisconcern,hisclaimthat...isuntenable.Nordoesthemerefactthat.lendsignificantsupportto.Sincetheeditorialfailstoruleouttheseandotherpossibleexplanationsfor.,Icannotacceptanyconclusionsabout.But,sincetheeditorialprovidesnoevidencetosubstantiatethisassumptionitisequallypossiblethat.Evenifthedeancansubstantiatealloftheforegoingassumptions,thedean'sassertionthat.isstillunwarranted.Itisentirelypossiblethatpeopleinclinedtorecycleweremorewillingtorespondedtothesurveythanotherpeoplewere.Withouteliminatingthispossibility,theownercannotrelyonthenationalsurveytoconcludethat.Giventhesepossiblescenarios.Tvesnothingabout.Byrelyingonthenationalsurveytosupportitsconclusiontheargumentdependsontheassumption'sconclusionthat.Thisscenarioisquitepossible,especiallyconsideringthat.Anyofthesescenarios,iftrue,wouldcastconsiderabledoubtontheargument'sconclusionthat.Thenationwidestudyshowing.doesnotnecessarilyapplyto.Withoutweighingrevenueagainstexpensestheargument'sconclusionisprematureatbest.Evenassumingisneverthelessimpossibletoassesstheauthor'sbroadercontentionthat…Absenteitheracleatdefinitionofthetermordearevidencethat.,theauthor'scontentionthat.issimplyunjustified.Inordertoestablishastrongcorrelationbetween.,thestudy'ssamplemustbesufficientinsizeandrepresentativeof.Lackingevidenceofasufficientlyrepresentativesample,theauthorcannotjustifiablyrelyonthestudytodrawanyconclusionwhatsoever.Adirectcorrelationbetween.doesnotnecessarilyprovethattheformercausesthelatter.Whileahighcorrelationisstrongevidenceofcausalrelationship,initselfitisnotsufficient.Theauthormustconsiderandeliminatethisandotherpossiblereasonswhy.otherwise,Icannotaccepttheauthor'simplicitclaimthat.Thissinglesampleisinsufficienttodrawanygeneralconclusionabout.Withoutadditionalsamplesfromdiversgeographiclocations,Icannotaccepttheauthor'ssweepinggeneralizationabout.Ontheonehand,theauthorignoresthepossibilitythat.;ontheotherhand,perhaps.Inshort,lackingevidencethatconditionsonthetwoislandsarerelevantlysimilar,theauthorcannotconvincemeonthebasisofBatia'sexperiencethat.Absentadditionalinformationaboutthecitedstudies,thesestudieslendnocrediblesupporttotheconclusionthat.Althoughthisisentirelypossible,theargumentprovidesnoevidencetosupportthisassumption.Commonsenseandexperiencetellsusthisisnotthecase,andthatavarietyofotherfactors,suchas…,alsoplaymajorroles.Withoutsuchevidencetheargumentcanberejectedoutofhand.Ifthisisthecase,itprovidesanalternativeexplanationforthefactthat...Theargumentfailstoindicatewhatportionofthepeoplesurveyedactuallyresponded;thesmallerthisportion,thelessreliabletheresults.并列(and)關(guān)系類排序/列舉(sequencing/listing)first(ly),firstofall,inthefirstplace,tobeginwith,thefirst(reason)is,initially,earliersecond(ly),then,next,followingthis/that,afterwards,afterthis/that,laterfinally,intheend,lastbutnottheleast遞進(jìn)(reinforcing)also,and,besides,furthermore,inaddition,what'smore,similarly,likewise,aswellas,moreover,andthen,too,notonly...but,even,besidesthis/thatC.等同(equating)is,refersto,mean,thatis,consistsof,inthesameway,likewise,similarly,accordingly,namely,equallyimportant,notonly.but(also),總結(jié)/

溫馨提示

  • 1. 本站所有資源如無(wú)特殊說(shuō)明,都需要本地電腦安裝OFFICE2007和PDF閱讀器。圖紙軟件為CAD,CAXA,PROE,UG,SolidWorks等.壓縮文件請(qǐng)下載最新的WinRAR軟件解壓。
  • 2. 本站的文檔不包含任何第三方提供的附件圖紙等,如果需要附件,請(qǐng)聯(lián)系上傳者。文件的所有權(quán)益歸上傳用戶所有。
  • 3. 本站RAR壓縮包中若帶圖紙,網(wǎng)頁(yè)內(nèi)容里面會(huì)有圖紙預(yù)覽,若沒(méi)有圖紙預(yù)覽就沒(méi)有圖紙。
  • 4. 未經(jīng)權(quán)益所有人同意不得將文件中的內(nèi)容挪作商業(yè)或盈利用途。
  • 5. 人人文庫(kù)網(wǎng)僅提供信息存儲(chǔ)空間,僅對(duì)用戶上傳內(nèi)容的表現(xiàn)方式做保護(hù)處理,對(duì)用戶上傳分享的文檔內(nèi)容本身不做任何修改或編輯,并不能對(duì)任何下載內(nèi)容負(fù)責(zé)。
  • 6. 下載文件中如有侵權(quán)或不適當(dāng)內(nèi)容,請(qǐng)與我們聯(lián)系,我們立即糾正。
  • 7. 本站不保證下載資源的準(zhǔn)確性、安全性和完整性, 同時(shí)也不承擔(dān)用戶因使用這些下載資源對(duì)自己和他人造成任何形式的傷害或損失。

最新文檔

評(píng)論

0/150

提交評(píng)論