data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e9c20/e9c20fa290293f3d3da83c8b367d6371c54978f1" alt="GRE寫(xiě)作固定句型(摘自黃皮書(shū))_第1頁(yè)"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/76df2/76df23ae33dc95206dc9d1d3da3a9e77158c8b38" alt="GRE寫(xiě)作固定句型(摘自黃皮書(shū))_第2頁(yè)"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/36958/3695864ddc657f3af3e44ac3a2f314310f30fa38" alt="GRE寫(xiě)作固定句型(摘自黃皮書(shū))_第3頁(yè)"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b6d70/b6d7015e8932dc9589c7fdce424f1ad3f29969a8" alt="GRE寫(xiě)作固定句型(摘自黃皮書(shū))_第4頁(yè)"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/43e52/43e520ddcea8275bcd6a20f95f2c5671324a2075" alt="GRE寫(xiě)作固定句型(摘自黃皮書(shū))_第5頁(yè)"
版權(quán)說(shuō)明:本文檔由用戶提供并上傳,收益歸屬內(nèi)容提供方,若內(nèi)容存在侵權(quán),請(qǐng)進(jìn)行舉報(bào)或認(rèn)領(lǐng)
文檔簡(jiǎn)介
8/8Themerefactthat...isinsufficientevidencetoconcludethat...conclude,show,prove,imply,support,justify,validate,indicate,illustrate,demonstrate,substantiateThefactthat.doesnotprovethat(doesnotsupporttheclaimthat/doesnotensurethat/lendsnostrongsupporttotheconclusionthat)Thefactthat.doesnotnecessarilyimplythat.Theargumentfailstoruleoutthepossibilitythata.Theargumentsimplyequates.with.Theauthorassumesthat.Theauthorprovidesnoevidencethat.Thisassumptionpresentsafalsedilemma,since.arenotnecessarilymutuallyexclusivealternatives.Commonsensetellsusthat.Whilethismaybetrueinsomecases,butitisequallypossiblethat.Lackingmorespecificinformationabout.,itisimpossibletoassess.lacking,intheabsenceof,forlackofassess,evaluate,judge,determineTheeditorialfailstotakeintoaccountpossibledifferencesbetween.Whileitistruethat.thisisnottrueofeveryone.Unlesstheauthorcandemonstratethat.theauthor'sconcernabouttheseissuesIsunfounded.Theauthorfailstoconsiderandruleoutotherfactorsthatmightaccountfor.Theauthorignores/failstotakeintoaccount(consider/explain)otherlikelybenefitsof…Unless...thereisagoodchanceTheauthorispresentingafalsedilemmabyimposinganeither—orchoicebetweentwocoursesofactionthatneednotbemutuallyexclusive.Comprehensiveanalysisisnecessarytoidentifytheactualcauseof.Therefore,anydecisionaimedataddressingtheproblemof.mustbebasedonmorethoroughinvestigationtogathersufficientdatainordertonarrowdownandlocatetheactualcausesoftheproblem.Fromthesurveyquotedintheargument,however,wefindnosignofsuchproceduresforrandomsampling,andhavegoodreasontodoubtifthesampleisrepresentativeenoughtoreflectthegeneralattitudesofallworkersasawhole.Whensamplesareusedtomakegeneralclaimsaboutaparticulargroup,thesamplesshouldbecloseenoughintimetothegeneralizationtheyareusedtosupport,sothathistoricalchangeswillnotinvalidatethegeneralization.Theproblemisthatthetwosituationsarenotsimilarenoughtojustifytheanalogicaldeduction.Theargumentrestsonthegratuitous/unreasonableassumptionthat.Thearguerfailstoestablishacausalrelationshipbetween.and.Thearguer'sconclusiondependsonthequestionableassumptionthat.Thearguerfailstoprovideanyinformationconcerning.Thereasoning(assumption)that.isopentodoubt/doubtful/suspicious/unreliable/problematic/questionable/unconvincing/unfounded/unwarranted/groundless.Anotherassumptioninshortoflegitimacyis.Theargueroversimplifiestheimportanceof.Theargueroveremphasizestheimportanceof...Theconclusionreachedinthisargumentisinvalidandprobablymisleading.Theevidenceprovidedinthisargumentisnotsufficienttovalidatetheassumptionthat.Thestatisticalevidence/theresultofthesurveyuponwhichtheargumentreliesistoovaguetobeinformative.Theargumentreliesonfiguresthataretooimprecisetosupporttheconclusiondrawn.Ifthesubjectsforthestudywererandomlychosenandrepresentadiversecrosssectionofthepopulationof.,theresultswillbereliableregardlessof.Sincethearguermakesaclaimabout.ingeneral,thesampleforthesurveyshouldbeabletorepresentall.Yetwearetoldnothingaboutthewaythepollwasconductedandhowwellitrepresentedthepublicopinions.Theexamplecited,isinsufficienttowarranttheirtruthbecausethereisnoreasontobelievethatthedatadrawnfrom.isrepresentativeof.Thearguerassumesthatwhatistrueofagroupasawholeisnecessarilytrueofeachmemberofthatgroup.Theargumentassumesthatwhatistrueofgroupofpeopletakencollectivelyisalsotrueofanyindividualwithinthatgroup.Theargumentattributesacharacteristicofanindividualmemberofagrouptogroupasawhole.Thearguersupporttheconclusionbyover—generalizingfromaspecificpieceofevidence.Thearguerdrawsahastyconclusionwhichisbasedoninadequateevidenceabout.Thearguergeneralizesonthebasisofasampleconsistingofatypicalcases.Theargueruseafewexceptionalcaseasthebasisforaclaimaboutwhatistrueingeneral.Thearguerdrawsaconclusionthatisbroaderinscopethaniswarrantedbytheevidenceadvanced.Theauthorgeneralizesfromwhatistrueinoneregionofspacetowhatmustbetrueinallregionsofspace.Thearguerattemptstoextractageneralprinciplefromaspecificcase.Theargumentassumesacausalrelationshipwhereonlyacorrelationhasbeenindicated.Thearguer'sreasoninglinkingAwithBseemsreasonableonthesurface,but…ThereisnoinformationavailabletojustifyanycausalrelationshipbetweenAandB.WedonothaveanyevidencesuggestingthatAwillcauseB.Contingenciessuchas...canallleadto...Antfurtherlinkageofthesetwophenomenarequiresmoreevidenceandisnotjustifiedbythedatasofaravailable.Tofindtheexactcauseof.examinationshouldbeappliedtoallthefactoesthathavesignificantimpacton.ItdoesnotnaturallywarranttheconclusionthatAhassignificantlycontributed,andthusiscausaltoB.Thisobservedphenomenon,actually,sayslittlemorethanthatthesetwoeventsaresynchronictoeachotherandthatisall.Theevidenceitcitesisconsistentwiththealternativehypothesisthat.Theargumentignoresfactorssuchas...thatmaybemoreimportantthanAindetermingB.Sincetheapplicanthasnotadequatelyrespondedtothisconcern,hisclaimthat...isuntenable.Nordoesthemerefactthat.lendsignificantsupportto.Sincetheeditorialfailstoruleouttheseandotherpossibleexplanationsfor.,Icannotacceptanyconclusionsabout.But,sincetheeditorialprovidesnoevidencetosubstantiatethisassumptionitisequallypossiblethat.Evenifthedeancansubstantiatealloftheforegoingassumptions,thedean'sassertionthat.isstillunwarranted.Itisentirelypossiblethatpeopleinclinedtorecycleweremorewillingtorespondedtothesurveythanotherpeoplewere.Withouteliminatingthispossibility,theownercannotrelyonthenationalsurveytoconcludethat.Giventhesepossiblescenarios.Tvesnothingabout.Byrelyingonthenationalsurveytosupportitsconclusiontheargumentdependsontheassumption'sconclusionthat.Thisscenarioisquitepossible,especiallyconsideringthat.Anyofthesescenarios,iftrue,wouldcastconsiderabledoubtontheargument'sconclusionthat.Thenationwidestudyshowing.doesnotnecessarilyapplyto.Withoutweighingrevenueagainstexpensestheargument'sconclusionisprematureatbest.Evenassumingisneverthelessimpossibletoassesstheauthor'sbroadercontentionthat…Absenteitheracleatdefinitionofthetermordearevidencethat.,theauthor'scontentionthat.issimplyunjustified.Inordertoestablishastrongcorrelationbetween.,thestudy'ssamplemustbesufficientinsizeandrepresentativeof.Lackingevidenceofasufficientlyrepresentativesample,theauthorcannotjustifiablyrelyonthestudytodrawanyconclusionwhatsoever.Adirectcorrelationbetween.doesnotnecessarilyprovethattheformercausesthelatter.Whileahighcorrelationisstrongevidenceofcausalrelationship,initselfitisnotsufficient.Theauthormustconsiderandeliminatethisandotherpossiblereasonswhy.otherwise,Icannotaccepttheauthor'simplicitclaimthat.Thissinglesampleisinsufficienttodrawanygeneralconclusionabout.Withoutadditionalsamplesfromdiversgeographiclocations,Icannotaccepttheauthor'ssweepinggeneralizationabout.Ontheonehand,theauthorignoresthepossibilitythat.;ontheotherhand,perhaps.Inshort,lackingevidencethatconditionsonthetwoislandsarerelevantlysimilar,theauthorcannotconvincemeonthebasisofBatia'sexperiencethat.Absentadditionalinformationaboutthecitedstudies,thesestudieslendnocrediblesupporttotheconclusionthat.Althoughthisisentirelypossible,theargumentprovidesnoevidencetosupportthisassumption.Commonsenseandexperiencetellsusthisisnotthecase,andthatavarietyofotherfactors,suchas…,alsoplaymajorroles.Withoutsuchevidencetheargumentcanberejectedoutofhand.Ifthisisthecase,itprovidesanalternativeexplanationforthefactthat...Theargumentfailstoindicatewhatportionofthepeoplesurveyedactuallyresponded;thesmallerthisportion,thelessreliabletheresults.并列(and)關(guān)系類排序/列舉(sequencing/listing)first(ly),firstofall,inthefirstplace,tobeginwith,thefirst(reason)is,initially,earliersecond(ly),then,next,followingthis/that,afterwards,afterthis/that,laterfinally,intheend,lastbutnottheleast遞進(jìn)(reinforcing)also,and,besides,furthermore,inaddition,what'smore,similarly,likewise,aswellas,moreover,andthen,too,notonly...but,even,besidesthis/thatC.等同(equating)is,refersto,mean,thatis,consistsof,inthesameway,likewise,similarly,accordingly,namely,equallyimportant,notonly.but(also),總結(jié)/
溫馨提示
- 1. 本站所有資源如無(wú)特殊說(shuō)明,都需要本地電腦安裝OFFICE2007和PDF閱讀器。圖紙軟件為CAD,CAXA,PROE,UG,SolidWorks等.壓縮文件請(qǐng)下載最新的WinRAR軟件解壓。
- 2. 本站的文檔不包含任何第三方提供的附件圖紙等,如果需要附件,請(qǐng)聯(lián)系上傳者。文件的所有權(quán)益歸上傳用戶所有。
- 3. 本站RAR壓縮包中若帶圖紙,網(wǎng)頁(yè)內(nèi)容里面會(huì)有圖紙預(yù)覽,若沒(méi)有圖紙預(yù)覽就沒(méi)有圖紙。
- 4. 未經(jīng)權(quán)益所有人同意不得將文件中的內(nèi)容挪作商業(yè)或盈利用途。
- 5. 人人文庫(kù)網(wǎng)僅提供信息存儲(chǔ)空間,僅對(duì)用戶上傳內(nèi)容的表現(xiàn)方式做保護(hù)處理,對(duì)用戶上傳分享的文檔內(nèi)容本身不做任何修改或編輯,并不能對(duì)任何下載內(nèi)容負(fù)責(zé)。
- 6. 下載文件中如有侵權(quán)或不適當(dāng)內(nèi)容,請(qǐng)與我們聯(lián)系,我們立即糾正。
- 7. 本站不保證下載資源的準(zhǔn)確性、安全性和完整性, 同時(shí)也不承擔(dān)用戶因使用這些下載資源對(duì)自己和他人造成任何形式的傷害或損失。
最新文檔
- 2024福建福州榕發(fā)(福州)置業(yè)有限公司招聘筆試參考題庫(kù)附帶答案詳解
- 全面監(jiān)督報(bào)告范文
- 取水工程專項(xiàng)報(bào)告范文
- 青少年勵(lì)志公益報(bào)告范文
- 青海省扶貧調(diào)研報(bào)告范文
- 2025年度洗車服務(wù)與廣告合作承包合同
- 二零二五年度果樹(shù)種植土地托管承包與農(nóng)村旅游發(fā)展合作協(xié)議
- 二零二五年度物流企業(yè)司機(jī)安全責(zé)任執(zhí)行協(xié)議
- 2025年度蔬菜育苗與農(nóng)業(yè)產(chǎn)業(yè)扶貧合作合同
- 二零二五年度交通事故財(cái)產(chǎn)損失賠償協(xié)議
- 2024年江蘇農(nóng)牧科技職業(yè)學(xué)院?jiǎn)握新殬I(yè)適應(yīng)性測(cè)試題庫(kù)含答案
- 崔允漷教授的課堂觀察框架:4個(gè)要素20個(gè)視角68個(gè)觀察點(diǎn)
- 大班益智區(qū)目標(biāo)及指導(dǎo)策略
- 小學(xué)二年級(jí)語(yǔ)文下冊(cè)《古詩(shī)二首》課件
- MOOC 信號(hào)與系統(tǒng)-北京交通大學(xué) 中國(guó)大學(xué)慕課答案
- 《研學(xué)旅行課程設(shè)計(jì)》課件-研學(xué)課程主題設(shè)計(jì)
- 《旅游概論》課件-旅游業(yè)的發(fā)展趨勢(shì)
- 2023年鐵路工務(wù)安全規(guī)則正文
- 大單元視角下小學(xué)語(yǔ)文單篇課文的教學(xué)
- 高低壓成套產(chǎn)品標(biāo)準(zhǔn)及檢測(cè)要求
- 語(yǔ)文-山東省泰安市2024屆高三下學(xué)期一模檢測(cè)試題和答案
評(píng)論
0/150
提交評(píng)論