版權(quán)說明:本文檔由用戶提供并上傳,收益歸屬內(nèi)容提供方,若內(nèi)容存在侵權(quán),請進(jìn)行舉報(bào)或認(rèn)領(lǐng)
文檔簡介
LITERATUREREVIEWLITERATUREREVIEWWhatisLR?Aliteraturereviewdiscussespublishedinformationinaparticularsubjectarea,andsometimesinformationinaparticularsubjectareawithinacertaintimeperiod.Aliteraturereviewcanbejustasimplesummaryofthesources,butitusuallyhasanorganizationalpatternandcombinesbothsummaryandsynthesis.2Dr.LiliAnnWhatisLR?AliteraturereviewWhatisLR?Asummaryisarecapoftheimportantinformationofthesource,butasynthesisisare-organization,orareshuffling,ofthatinformation.Itmightgiveanewinterpretationofoldmaterialorcombinenewwitholdinterpretations.Oritmighttracetheintellectualprogressionofthefield,includingmajordebates.Anddependingonthesituation,theliteraturereviewmayevaluatethesourcesandadvisethereaderonthemostpertinentorrelevant.3Dr.LiliAnnWhatisLR?AsummaryisarecaWhatisLR?Theformatofareviewofliteraturemayvaryfromdisciplinetodisciplineandfromassignmenttoassignment.Areviewmaybeaself-containedunit--anendinitself--oraprefacetoandrationaleforengaginginprimaryresearch.Areviewisarequiredpartofgrantandresearchproposalsandoftenachapterinthesesanddissertations.Generally,thepurposeofareviewistoanalyzecriticallyasegmentofapublishedbodyofknowledgethroughsummary,classification,andcomparisonofpriorresearchstudies,reviewsofliterature,andtheoreticalarticles.4Dr.LiliAnnWhatisLR?TheformatofarevWhatisLR?Aliteraturereviewistheeffectiveevaluationofselecteddocumentsonaresearchtopic.Areviewmayformanessentialpartoftheresearchprocessormayconstitutearesearchprojectinitself.Inthecontextofaresearchpaperorthesistheliteraturereviewisacriticalsynthesisofpreviousresearch.Theevaluationoftheliteratureleadslogicallytotheresearchquestion.5Dr.LiliAnnWhatisLR?AliteraturereviewWhatisLR?6Dr.LiliAnnWhatisLR?6Dr.LiliAnnWhywriteLR?Literaturereviewsprovideyouwithahandyguidetoaparticulartopic.Ifyouhavelimitedtimetoconductresearch,literaturereviewscangiveyouanovervieworactasasteppingstone.Literaturereviewsalsoprovideasolidbackgroundforaresearchpaper'sinvestigation.Comprehensiveknowledgeoftheliteratureofthefieldisessentialtomostresearchpapers.7Dr.LiliAnnWhywriteLR?LiteraturereviewWhywriteLR?Forprofessionals,theyareusefulreportsthatkeepthemuptodatewithwhatiscurrentinthefield.Forscholars,thedepthandbreadthoftheliteraturereviewemphasizesthecredibilityofthewriterinhisorherfield8Dr.LiliAnnWhywriteLR?ForprofessionalsWhywriteLR?Thepurposeofaliteraturereviewisforyoutotakeacriticallookattheliterature(factsandviews)thatalreadyexistsintheareayouareresearching.Aliteraturereviewisnotashoppinglistofeverythingthatexists,butacriticalanalysisthatshowsanevaluationoftheexistingliteratureandarelationshipbetweenthedifferentworks.Itdemonstratestherelevanceoftheresearch.9Dr.LiliAnnWhywriteLR?ThepurposeofaWhywriteLR?Literaturecanincludebooks,journalarticles,internet(electronicjournals),newspapers,magazines,thesesanddissertations,conferenceproceedings,reports,anddocumentaries.Literaturereviewsarewrittenoccasionallyinthehumanities,butmostlyinthesciencesandsocialsciences;inexperimentandlabreports,theyconstituteasectionofthepaper.Sometimesaliteraturereviewiswrittenasapaperinitself.10Dr.LiliAnnWhywriteLR?LiteraturecaninWhywriteLR?Inthecontextofaresearchpaperonathesis,theliteraturereviewprovidesabackgroundtothestudybeingproposed.Thebackgroundmayconsideroneormoreofthefollowingaspectsdependingontheresearchquestionbeingposed:Theoreticalbackground–past,presentorfutureClinicalpractice–previousorcontemporaryMethodologyand/orresearchmethodsPreviousfindingsRationaleand/orrelevanceofthecurrentstudy11Dr.LiliAnnWhywriteLR?InthecontextofWhywriteLR?Inabroadercontext
Hart(1998)liststhefollowingpurposesofareview:Distinguishingwhathasbeendonefromwhatneedstobedone;Discoveringimportantvariablesrelevanttothetopic;Synthesisingandgaininganewperspective;Identifyingrelationshipsbetweenideasandpractice;Establishingthecontextofthetopicorproblem;12Dr.LiliAnnWhywriteLR?InabroadercontWhywriteLR?Rationalisingthesignificanceoftheproblem;Enhancingandacquiringthesubjectvocabulary;Understandingthestructureofthesubject;Relatingideasandtheorytoapplications;Identifyingmethodologiesandtechniquesthathavebeenused;Placingtheresearchinahistoricalcontexttoshowfamiliaritywithstate-of-the-artdevelopments.13Dr.LiliAnnWhywriteLR?RationalisingtheWhywriteLR?Itspurposeisto:PlaceeachworkinthecontextofitscontributiontotheunderstandingofthesubjectunderreviewDescribetherelationshipofeachworktotheothersunderconsiderationIdentifynewwaystointerpret,andshedlightonanygapsin,previousresearchResolveconflictsamongstseeminglycontradictorypreviousstudiesIdentifyareasofpriorscholarshiptopreventduplicationofeffortPointthewayforwardforfurtherresearchPlaceone'soriginalwork(inthecaseofthesesordissertations)inthecontextofexistingliterature14Dr.LiliAnnWhywriteLR?ItspurposeistoWhatshouldIdobeforewritingtheliteraturereview?ClarifyIfyourassignmentisnotveryspecific,seekclarificationfromyoursupervisor/lecturer:Roughlyhowmanysourcesshouldyouinclude?Whattypesofsources(books,journalarticles,websites)?Shouldyousummarize,synthesize,orcritiqueyoursourcesbydiscussingacommonthemeorissue?Shouldyouevaluateyoursources?Shouldyouprovidesubheadingsandotherbackgroundinformation,suchasdefinitionsand/orahistory?15Dr.LiliAnnWhatshouldIdobeforewritinWhatshouldIdobeforewritingtheliteraturereview?FindmodelsLookforotherliteraturereviewsinyourareaofinterestorinthedisciplineandreadthemtogetasenseofthetypesofthemesyoumightwanttolookforinyourownresearchorwaystoorganizeyourfinalreview.Youcansimplyputtheword"review"inyoursearchenginealongwithyourothertopictermstofindarticlesofthistypeontheInternetorinanelectronicdatabase.Thebibliographyorreferencesectionofsourcesyou'vealreadyreadarealsoexcellententrypointsintoyourownresearch.16Dr.LiliAnnWhatshouldIdobeforewritinWhatshouldIdobeforewritingtheliteraturereview?NarrowyourtopicTherearehundredsoreventhousandsofarticlesandbooksonmostareasofstudy.Thenarroweryourtopic,theeasieritwillbetolimitthenumberofsourcesyouneedtoreadinordertogetagoodsurveyofthematerial.Yourinstructorwillprobablynotexpectyoutoreadeverythingthat'soutthereonthetopic,butyou'llmakeyourjobeasierifyoufirstlimityourscope.17Dr.LiliAnnWhatshouldIdobeforewritinWhatshouldIdobeforewritingtheliteraturereview?ConsiderwhetheryoursourcesarecurrentSomedisciplinesrequirethatyouuseinformationthatisascurrentaspossible.Inthesciences,forinstance,treatmentsformedicalproblemsareconstantlychangingaccordingtothelateststudies.Informationeventwoyearsoldcouldbeobsolete.18Dr.LiliAnnWhatshouldIdobeforewritinWhatshouldIdobeforewritingtheliteraturereview?However,ifyouarewritingareviewinthehumanities,history,orsocialsciences,asurveyofthehistoryoftheliteraturemaybewhatisneeded,becausewhatisimportantishowperspectiveshavechangedthroughtheyearsorwithinacertaintimeperiod.Trysortingthroughsomeothercurrentbibliographiesorliteraturereviewsinthefieldtogetasenseofwhatyourdisciplineexpects.Youcanalsousethismethodtoconsiderwhatis"hot"andwhatisnot.19Dr.LiliAnnWhatshouldIdobeforewritinWhatshouldIdobeforewritingtheliteraturereview?FindafocusAliteraturereview,likeatermpaper,isusuallyorganizedaroundideas,notthesourcesthemselvesasanannotatedbibliographywouldbeorganized.Thismeansthatyouwillnotjustsimplylistyoursourcesandgointodetailabouteachoneofthem,oneatatime.No.20Dr.LiliAnnWhatshouldIdobeforewritinWhatshouldIdobeforewritingtheliteraturereview?Asyoureadwidelybutselectivelyinyourtopicarea,considerinsteadwhatthemesorissuesconnectyoursourcestogether.Dotheypresentoneordifferentsolutions?Isthereanaspectofthefieldthatismissing?Howwelldotheypresentthematerialanddotheyportrayitaccordingtoanappropriatetheory?Dotheyrevealatrendinthefield?Aragingdebate?Pickoneofthesethemestofocustheorganizationofyourreview.21Dr.LiliAnnWhatshouldIdobeforewritinWhatshouldIdobeforewritingtheliteraturereview?ConstructaworkingthesisstatementThenusethefocusyou'vefoundtoconstructathesisstatement.Yes!Literaturereviewshavethesisstatementsaswell!However,yourthesisstatementwillnotnecessarilyargueforapositionoranopinion;ratheritwillargueforaparticularperspectiveonthematerial.22Dr.LiliAnnWhatshouldIdobeforewritinWhatshouldIdobeforewritingtheliteraturereview?Somesamplethesisstatementsforliteraturereviewsareasfollows:Thecurrenttrendintreatmentforcongestiveheartfailurecombinessurgeryandmedicine.Moreandmoreculturalstudiesscholarsareacceptingpopularmediaasasubjectworthyofacademicconsideration.23Dr.LiliAnnWhatshouldIdobeforewritinWhatshouldIdobeforewritingtheliteraturereview?ConsiderorganizationYou'vegotafocus,andyou'venarroweditdowntoathesisstatement.Nowwhatisthemosteffectivewayofpresentingtheinformation?Whatarethemostimportanttopics,subtopics,etc.,thatyourreviewneedstoinclude?Andinwhatordershouldyoupresentthem?24Dr.LiliAnnWhatshouldIdobeforewritinWhatshouldIdobeforewritingtheliteraturereview?Developanorganizationforyourreviewatbothaglobalandlocallevel:First,coverthebasiccategoriesJustlikemostacademicpapers,literaturereviewsalsomustcontainatleastthreebasicelements:anintroductionorbackgroundinformationsection;thebodyofthereviewcontainingthediscussionofsources;and,finally,aconclusionand/orrecommendationssectiontoendthepaper.25Dr.LiliAnnWhatshouldIdobeforewritinWhatshouldIdobeforewritingtheliteraturereview?Introduction:Givesaquickideaofthetopicoftheliteraturereview,suchasthecentralthemeororganizationalpattern.Body:Containsyourdiscussionofsourcesandisorganizedeitherchronologically,thematically,ormethodologically(seebelowformoreinformationoneach).Conclusions/Recommendations:Discusswhatyouhavedrawnfromreviewingliteraturesofar.Wheremightthediscussionproceed?26Dr.LiliAnnWhatshouldIdobeforewritinWhatshouldIdobeforewritingtheliteraturereview?Theintroductionshouldprovidethereaderwiththescaleandstructureofyourreview.Itservesasakindofmap.Thebodyofthereviewdependsonhowyouhaveorganisedyourkeypoints.Literaturereviewsatpostgraduatelevelshouldbeevaluativeandnotmerelydescriptive.Forexamplepossiblereasonsforsimilaritiesordifferencesbetweenstudiesareconsideredratherthanamereidentificationofthem.Theconclusionofthereviewneedstosumupthemainfindingsofyourresearchintotheliterature.Thefindingscanberelatedtotheaimsofthestudyyouareproposingtodo.Thereaderisthusprovidedwithacoherentbackgroundtothecurrentstudy.27Dr.LiliAnnWhatshouldIdobeforewritinWhatshouldIdobeforewritingtheliteraturereview?OrganizingthebodyOnceyouhavethebasiccategoriesinplace,thenyoumustconsiderhowyouwillpresentthesourcesthemselveswithinthebodyofyourpaper.Createanorganizationalmethodtofocusthissectionevenfurther.Tohelpyoucomeupwithanoverallorganizationalframeworkforyourreview,considerthesixtypicalwaysoforganizingthesourcesintoareview:Chronological
BypublicationBytrendThematicMethodologicalQuestionsforFurtherResearch28Dr.LiliAnnWhatshouldIdobeforewritinWhatshouldIdobeforewritingtheliteraturereview?Similartoprimaryresearch,developmentoftheliteraturereviewrequiresfourstages:Problemformulation—whichtopicorfieldisbeingexaminedandwhatareitscomponentissues?Literaturesearch—findingmaterialsrelevanttothesubjectbeingexploredDataevaluation—determiningwhichliteraturemakesasignificantcontributiontotheunderstandingofthetopicAnalysisandinterpretation—discussingthefindingsandconclusionsofpertinentliterature29Dr.LiliAnnWhatshouldIdobeforewritinWhatshouldyouwrite?theacceptedfactsintheareathepopularopinionthemainvariablestherelationshipbetweenconceptsandvariablesshortcomingsintheexistingfindingslimitationsinthemethodsusedintheexistingfindingstherelevanceofyourresearchsuggestionsforfurtherresearchinthearea.30Dr.LiliAnnWhatshouldyouwrite?theacceWhatshouldyouwrite?Literaturereviewsshouldcomprisethefollowingelements:Anoverviewofthesubject,issueortheoryunderconsideration,alongwiththeobjectivesoftheliteraturereviewDivisionofworksunderreviewintocategories(e.g.thoseinsupportofaparticularposition,thoseagainst,andthoseofferingalternativethesesentirely)ExplanationofhoweachworkissimilartoandhowitvariesfromtheothersConclusionsastowhichpiecesarebestconsideredintheirargument,aremostconvincingoftheiropinions,andmakethegreatestcontributiontotheunderstandinganddevelopmentoftheirareaofresearch31Dr.LiliAnnWhatshouldyouwrite?LiteratuWhatshouldyouwrite?Inassessingeachpiece,considerationshouldbegivento:Provenance—Whataretheauthor'scredentials?Aretheauthor'sargumentssupportedbyevidence(e.g.primaryhistoricalmaterial,casestudies,narratives,statistics,recentscientificfindings)?Objectivity—Istheauthor'sperspectiveeven-handedorprejudicial?Iscontrarydataconsideredoriscertainpertinentinformationignoredtoprovetheauthor'spoint?Persuasiveness—Whichoftheauthor'sthesesaremost/leastconvincing?Value—Aretheauthor'sargumentsandconclusionsconvincing?Doestheworkultimatelycontributeinanysignificantwaytoanunderstandingofthesubject?32Dr.LiliAnnWhatshouldyouwrite?InassesWhatshouldyouwrite?LayoutMakeyourliteraturereviewhaveanacademicandprofessionalappearance.HerearesomepointstomakethelookofyourreportappealingtothereaderWhitespace:leavespacebetweensections,especiallyfromtheabstract.Thisgivesanunclutteredeffect.Headings/sub-headings:thesehelptoseparateideas.Textboxes:youcanusetheseforquotationsorparaphrasingtoseparatethemfromtherestofyourtext.Itisalsopleasingtotheeye.33Dr.LiliAnnWhatshouldyouwrite?Layout33Whatshouldyouwrite?Graphics:centreyourgraphics,suchasdiagramsortables,tohavespacearoundthem.Trynottoburygraphicsinyourtext.Pagination:youcannumberpagesorsectionsorboth,buttheimportantthingtodoistobeconsistent.Thecoverpagenormallyisnotnumbered.Thecontentpageandabstractpageusuallyhaveaseparatenumberingsystemtothebodyofyourliteraturereview.34Dr.LiliAnnWhatshouldyouwrite?GraphicsWhatshouldyouwrite?LanguagefocusCreateabalancebetweendirectquotation(citation)andparaphrasing.Avoidtoomuchdirectquoting.Theverbtensechosendependsonyouremphasis:Whenyouarecitingaspecificauthor'sfindings,usethepasttense:(found,demonstrated);Whenyouarewritingaboutanacceptedfact,usethepresenttense:(demonstrates,finds);andWhenyouarecitingseveralauthorsormakingageneralstatement,usethepresentperfecttense:(haveshown,havefound,littleresearchhasbeendone).35Dr.LiliAnnWhatshouldyouwrite?LanguageWhatshouldyouwrite?FinalchecklistHaveIfulfilledthepurposeoftheliteraturereview?Isitwrittenatalevelappropriatetoitsaudience?Areitsfactscorrect?Isalltheinformationincludedrelevant?Arethelayoutandpresentationeasyontheeye?Isthelanguageclear,conciseandacademic?Doestheabstractsummarisetheentirereview?Doestheintroductionadequatelyintroducethetopic?Isthebodyorganisedlogically?Doestheconclusioninterpret,analyseandevaluate?Aretherecommendationsreasonable?Doesthetableofcontentscorrespondwiththeactualcontents?Arepagenumberscorrect?HaveIacknowledgedallsourcesofinformationthroughcorrectreferencing?HaveIcheckedspelling,grammarandpunctuation?HaveIcarefullyproof-readthefinaldraft?36Dr.LiliAnnWhatshouldyouwrite?FinalchHowtoreview?Thewholeprocessofreviewingincludes: a.Searchingforliterature
b.Sortingandprioritisingtheretrievedliterature
c.Analyticalreadingofpapers
d.Evaluativereadingofpapers
e.Comparisonacrossstudies
f.Organisingthecontent
g.Writingthereview37Dr.LiliAnnHowtoreview?ThewholeprocesHowtoreview?ComparisonacrossstudiesTheaimistoextractkeypointsbycomparingandcontrastingACROSSstudies,insteadofreadingonepaperafteranother.Keypointsforareviewmayconcernareasofsimilaritiesand/ordifferencesin:Researchaim(s)orhypothesesResearchdesignandsamplingInstrumentsandproceduresusedHowdatawereanalysedResultsorfindingsInterpretations38Dr.LiliAnnHowtoreview?ComparisonacrosHowtoreview?Findsimilaritiesanddifferencesbetweenstudiesatdifferentlevels,e.g.: -philosophy
-epistemology
-morality
-methodology
-methods
-typesofdata
-dataanalysis
-interpretation39Dr.LiliAnnHowtoreview?FindsimilaritieHowtoreview?Setoutyourthinkingonpaperthroughmapsandtrees.40Dr.LiliAnnHowtoreview?SetoutyourthiHowtoreview?Tipsonwriting41Dr.LiliAnnHowtoreview?Tipsonwriting4Howtoreview?Pitfalls -Vaguenessduetotoomuchorinappropriategeneralisations
-Limitedrange
-Insufficientinformation
-Irrelevantmaterial
-Omissionofcontrastingview
-Omissionofrecentwork42Dr.LiliAnnHowtoreview?Pitfalls42Dr.LExample Earlyworkshaveaddressedsomeoftheproblemsandissuesdiscussedinvideoretrieval.Researchershavedevelopedideasandtoolsforsupportingvideoediting,forexamplein[8].Theyhavedefinedaseamlessvideoeditinginthegradientdomain.Thespatio-temporalgradientfieldsoftargetvideosaremodifiedormixedtogenerateanewgradientfield,whichisusuallynotintegrateable.Theyhavealsodescribedhowsemanticinformationaboutvideocanbestructuredandusedforcontent-basedaccess.Fromageneralvideoarchivepointofview,theproblemwiththistoolisthelackofsupportformanagingvideodocumentstructures.Adigitalvideoarchiveservingdifferentcategoriesofusersshouldofferamorestructuredwayofdescribingvideocontents43Dr.LiliAnnExample EarlyworkshaveaddreExample HiddenMarkovModels(HMMs)arestatisticaltoolsthathavebeenusedsuccessfullyinmodellingdifficulttaskssuchasspeechrecognition[15]orbiologicalsequenceanalysis[16].Inspiredbyasimilarspeechapplication,HiddenMarkovmodel(HMM)hasalsobeenappliedtoactivityrecognition.ThefirstapproachforthehumanmovementsbasedonHMMswasdescribedin[13].Itdistinguishedbetweensixdifferenttennisstrokes.Thissystemdividedtheimageintomeshesandcountedthenumberofpixelsrepresentingthepersonforeachmesh.Thenumberswerecomposedtoafeaturevectorthatwasconvertedintoadiscretelabelbyavectorquantizer.ThelabelswereclassifiedbasedondiscreteHMMs.In[8],anHMMisusedasarepresentationofsimpleactionswhicharerecognizedbycomputingtheprobabilitythatthemodelproducesthevisualobservationsequence.In[14]layeredHMMswereproposedtomodelsinglepersonofficeactivitiesatvarioustimegranularities44Dr.LiliAnnExample HiddenMarkovModels(Example Mostoftheexistingworkreliesonusingonlyasinglesourceofinformation(example,eitheraudioorvisualtrackdataalone).In[4],theaveragevideoshotactivityandthedurationareusedasfeaturesforthecategorizationofmoviesaccordingtotheactions.Anactionscenewascharacterizedbytemporallylocalizedpropertiesofvideoshotswhichhavelittleornorecurringsimilarvisualcontents[5].Althoughthesevisualcharactersareundoubtedlygoodindicatorsofrapidlyevolvingactioncontents,theyarenotenoughtodeterminethedesiredaction.Ontheotherhand,audio-basedactiondetectionwasindependentlyperformedonthesoundtrackin[6].However,thisaudioalonemethodmayleadtomanypotentialfalsedetectedcasesbecausemanysoundsoftenmixdifferentnoisesandothersimilarbackgroundsound.45Dr.LiliAnnExample MostoftheexistingwExampleVideoPre-processingClassificationMotionGenreObjectEventShotColourFeatureExtractionEdgeFeatureExtractionObjectCameraLengthDurationColourHistogramEdgeDetectionEdgeClusteringPanZoomTranslationEdgeCountRule-basedclassifiersRecognitionresultFIGURE2.3SchematicdiagramforvideoclassificationSource:L.N.Abdullahetal.2005.46Dr.LiliAnnExampleVideoPre-processingClasExample47Dr.LiliAnnExample47Dr.LiliAnnLITERATUREREVIEWLITERATUREREVIEWWhatisLR?Aliteraturereviewdiscussespublishedinformationinaparticularsubjectarea,andsometimesinformationinaparticularsubjectareawithinacertaintimeperiod.Aliteraturereviewcanbejustasimplesummaryofthesources,butitusuallyhasanorganizationalpatternandcombinesbothsummaryandsynthesis.49Dr.LiliAnnWhatisLR?AliteraturereviewWhatisLR?Asummaryisarecapoftheimportantinformationofthesource,butasynthesisisare-organization,orareshuffling,ofthatinformation.Itmightgiveanewinterpretationofoldmaterialorcombinenewwitholdinterpretations.Oritmighttracetheintellectualprogressionofthefield,includingmajordebates.Anddependingonthesituation,theliteraturereviewmayevaluatethesourcesandadvisethereaderonthemostpertinentorrelevant.50Dr.LiliAnnWhatisLR?AsummaryisarecaWhatisLR?Theformatofareviewofliteraturemayvaryfromdisciplinetodisciplineandfromassignmenttoassignment.Areviewmaybeaself-containedunit--anendinitself--oraprefacetoandrationaleforengaginginprimaryresearch.Areviewisarequiredpartofgrantandresearchproposalsandoftenachapterinthesesanddissertations.Generally,thepurposeofareviewistoanalyzecriticallyasegmentofapublishedbodyofknowledgethroughsummary,classification,andcomparisonofpriorresearchstudies,reviewsofliterature,andtheoreticalarticles.51Dr.LiliAnnWhatisLR?TheformatofarevWhatisLR?Aliteraturereviewistheeffectiveevaluationofselecteddocumentsonaresearchtopic.Areviewmayformanessentialpartoftheresearchprocessormayconstitutearesearchprojectinitself.Inthecontextofaresearchpaperorthesistheliteraturereviewisacriticalsynthesisofpreviousresearch.Theevaluationoftheliteratureleadslogicallytotheresearchquestion.52Dr.LiliAnnWhatisLR?AliteraturereviewWhatisLR?53Dr.LiliAnnWhatisLR?6Dr.LiliAnnWhywriteLR?Literaturereviewsprovideyouwithahandyguidetoaparticulartopic.Ifyouhavelimitedtimetoconductresearch,literaturereviewscangiveyouanovervieworactasasteppingstone.Literaturereviewsalsoprovideasolidbackgroundforaresearchpaper'sinvestigation.Comprehensiveknowledgeoftheliteratureofthefieldisessentialtomostresearchpapers.54Dr.LiliAnnWhywriteLR?LiteraturereviewWhywriteLR?Forprofessionals,theyareusefulreportsthatkeepthemuptodatewithwhatiscurrentinthefield.Forscholars,thedepthandbreadthoftheliteraturereviewemphasizesthecredibilityofthewriterinhisorherfield55Dr.LiliAnnWhywriteLR?ForprofessionalsWhywriteLR?Thepurposeofaliteraturereviewisforyoutotakeacriticallookattheliterature(factsandviews)thatalreadyexistsintheareayouareresearching.Aliteraturereviewisnotashoppinglistofeverythingthatexists,butacriticalanalysisthatshowsanevaluationoftheexistingliteratureandarelationshipbetweenthedifferentworks.Itdemonstratestherelevanceoftheresearch.56Dr.LiliAnnWhywriteLR?ThepurposeofaWhywriteLR?Literaturecanincludebooks,journalarticles,internet(electronicjournals),newspapers,magazines,thesesanddissertations,conferenceproceedings,reports,anddocumentaries.Literaturereviewsarewrittenoccasionallyinthehumanities,butmostlyinthesciencesandsocialsciences;inexperimentandlabreports,theyconstituteasectionofthepaper.Sometimesaliteraturereviewiswrittenasapaperinitself.57Dr.LiliAnnWhywriteLR?LiteraturecaninWhywriteLR?Inthecontextofaresearchpaperonathesis,theliteraturereviewprovidesabackgroundtothestudybeingproposed.Thebackgroundmayconsideroneormoreofthefollowingaspectsdependingontheresearchquestionbeingposed:Theoreticalbackground–past,presentorfutureClinicalpractice–previousorcontemporaryMethodologyand/orresearchmethodsPreviousfindingsRationaleand/orrelevanceofthecurrentstudy58Dr.LiliAnnWhywriteLR?InthecontextofWhywriteLR?Inabroadercontext
Hart(1998)liststhefollowingpurposesofareview:Distinguishingwhathasbeendonefromwhatneedstobedone;Discoveringimportantvariablesrelevanttothetopic;Synthesisingandgaininganewperspective;Identifyingrelationshipsbetweenideasandpractice;Establishingthecontextofthetopicorproblem;59Dr.LiliAnnWhywriteLR?InabroadercontWhywriteLR?Rati
溫馨提示
- 1. 本站所有資源如無特殊說明,都需要本地電腦安裝OFFICE2007和PDF閱讀器。圖紙軟件為CAD,CAXA,PROE,UG,SolidWorks等.壓縮文件請下載最新的WinRAR軟件解壓。
- 2. 本站的文檔不包含任何第三方提供的附件圖紙等,如果需要附件,請聯(lián)系上傳者。文件的所有權(quán)益歸上傳用戶所有。
- 3. 本站RAR壓縮包中若帶圖紙,網(wǎng)頁內(nèi)容里面會(huì)有圖紙預(yù)覽,若沒有圖紙預(yù)覽就沒有圖紙。
- 4. 未經(jīng)權(quán)益所有人同意不得將文件中的內(nèi)容挪作商業(yè)或盈利用途。
- 5. 人人文庫網(wǎng)僅提供信息存儲(chǔ)空間,僅對用戶上傳內(nèi)容的表現(xiàn)方式做保護(hù)處理,對用戶上傳分享的文檔內(nèi)容本身不做任何修改或編輯,并不能對任何下載內(nèi)容負(fù)責(zé)。
- 6. 下載文件中如有侵權(quán)或不適當(dāng)內(nèi)容,請與我們聯(lián)系,我們立即糾正。
- 7. 本站不保證下載資源的準(zhǔn)確性、安全性和完整性, 同時(shí)也不承擔(dān)用戶因使用這些下載資源對自己和他人造成任何形式的傷害或損失。
最新文檔
- 【正版授權(quán)】 ISO 20679:2025 EN Ships and marine technology - Marine environment protection - Testing of ship biofouling in-water cleaning systems
- 我的家鄉(xiāng)敘事課程設(shè)計(jì)
- 弦樂小夜曲課程設(shè)計(jì)
- 中西醫(yī)執(zhí)業(yè)醫(yī)師模擬試卷16
- 礦井灌漿設(shè)計(jì)課程設(shè)計(jì)
- 站姿坐姿課程設(shè)計(jì)
- 花藝烘焙課程設(shè)計(jì)
- 藥品驗(yàn)收入門課程設(shè)計(jì)
- 互聯(lián)網(wǎng)行業(yè)安全管理實(shí)踐
- 領(lǐng)導(dǎo)班子與教學(xué)院校協(xié)調(diào)計(jì)劃
- 叉車定期檢驗(yàn)研究報(bào)告
- 人教版一年級數(shù)學(xué)上冊期末無紙筆考試試卷(A卷)【含答案】
- 2,3-二甲苯酚的理化性質(zhì)及危險(xiǎn)特性表
- 申報(bào)職稱:副教授演示課件
- 型濾池計(jì)算說明書
- 格力離心機(jī)技術(shù)服務(wù)手冊
- 水泥攪拌樁計(jì)算(完美)
- 旭化成離子交換膜的介紹
- JJRB輕鋼龍骨隔墻施工方案要點(diǎn)
- 石油石化用化學(xué)劑產(chǎn)品質(zhì)量認(rèn)可實(shí)施細(xì)則
- 快遞證明模板
評論
0/150
提交評論