版權說明:本文檔由用戶提供并上傳,收益歸屬內(nèi)容提供方,若內(nèi)容存在侵權,請進行舉報或認領
文檔簡介
III)LanguageTesting1)IntroductionToLanguageTest2)TypesofTesting3)ApproachestoTesting語言測試
作為語言教學評價的一個組成部分
---asadiscipline
內(nèi)容(ContentSciences):
1)研究語言本身系統(tǒng)的科學(語言學,語義學等);
2)研究語言運用的科學
(語言哲學,語用學);
3)語言學科與其它學科結(jié)合的科際學科(心理語言學,神經(jīng)語言學)
4)對語言學有決定作用的學科(哲學,心理學,教育學)
方法/手段(MethodologySciences):
1)測量科學(教育測量學,心理測量學)
2)實驗方法論
3)信息技術(計算機科學,計算機語言學)
Source:
李筱菊,《語言測試科學與藝術》,湖南教育出版社,1997
I)IntroductionToLanguageTestTestingAndTeachingWhatShouldBeTestedAnd
toWhatStandard?TestingTheLanguageSkills
TestingLanguageAreasLanguageSkillsAndLanguageElementsRecognitionAndProductionProblemsofSamplingAvoidingTrapsForTheStudentsReference:WritingEnglishLanguageTest,P6-
TestingAndTeaching
BothtestingandteachingaresocloselyinterrelatedthatitisvirtuallyImpossibletoworkineitherfieldwithoutbeingconstantlyconcernedwiththeother;Testsareconstructedprimarilyasdevicesto1)motivatestudentsandreinforcelearning---thetestisgeared/adjustedtotheteachingthathastakenplace&2)assessthestudents’performance---theteachingisoftengearedlargelytothetest;Standardizedtestsandpublicexaminationsmayexertsuchaconsiderableinfluenceontheaverageteacherthattheyareofteninstrumental(decisive/essential)indeterminingthekindofteachingthattakesplacebeforethetest.TestingAndTeachingTeachingcontentTesting
TeachingmethodTeachingAimHowcanLTandSLAbenefitfromeachother?ContributionsofLTtoSLA1)Definingtheconstructoflanguageability;2)ApplyingLTfindingtotestSLAhypotheses;3)ProvidingSLAresearcherswithqualitycriteriafortestsandtasks;ContributionsofSLAtoLT1)Identifyinglanguagecomponentsforelicitationandcriteriafortheirassessment;2)Informinglanguagetestersaboutdifferencesandmodating(使適應,調(diào)節(jié))thesedifferencesSource:P156-170,Bachman&Cohen,InterfacesbetweenSecondlanguageAcquisitionandLanguageTestingResearch,外研社2002ABasicModelofTestBackwash
participantsprocessproducts
TESTStudentsLearningTeachersTeachingResearchersResearchresultsMaterials,Writers&CurriculumdesignersNewmaterialsAndNewcurriculaBackwashmechanism
byAlderson&WallWashbackonteaching:Atestwillinfluenceteaching;Atestwillinfluencewhatteachersteach;Atestwillinfluencehowteachersteach;AtestwillinfluencetherateandsequenceofteachingAtestwillinfluencethedegreeanddepthofteaching;Atestwillinfluenceattitudestothecontent,method,etc.ofteachingandlearning;Washbackonlearning:Atestwillinfluencelearning;Atestwillinfluencewhatlearnerslearn;Atestwillinfluencehowlearnerslearn;Atestwillinfluencetherateandsequenceoflearning;Atestwillinfluencethedegreeanddepthoflearning;attitudestotheattitudestothecontent,method,etc.ofteachingandlearning;Strengthofwashback:Teststhathaveimportantconsequenceswillhavewashback;andconverselyTeststhatdonothaveimportantconsequenceswillhavenowashback;Testwillhavewashbackonalllearnersandteachers;Testwillhavewashbackeffectsforsomelearnersandsometeachers,butnotforothers;
ContentandStandardoftesting
Importanceofanalyzingthelanguagebeingtested;Takeintoconsiderationthewholecomplexsystemoflanguageskillsandpatternsoflinguisticbehaviorinaparticularsituation(context)andataparticulartime---substitutemoderndescriptivegrammarforolderprescriptiveone;TestTheLanguageSkillsandLanguageElements,andbothRecognitionandProductionskills;Beforeatestisconstructed,questionthestandardswhicharebeingset---toodemanding?Realistic?Equivalenttosomestandardizedgrade/band?
Specificationsfortestwriters1)Whatisthepurposeofthetest:mainlyplacement,progress,achievement,Proficiency,diagnostic.2)Whatsortoflearnerwillbetakingthetest:age,levelofproficiency/stageoflearning,likelylevelofbackground(world)knowledge?3)Howmanysections/papersshouldthetesthave,howlongshouldtheybeandhowwilltheybedifferentiated(e.g.Listeningandwritingintegratedintoonepaper)?4)Whattargetlanguagesituationisenvisagedforthetest,andisthistobesimulatedinsomewayinthetestcontentandmethod?*reference:Alderson,LanguageTestConstructionandEvaluation5)Whattexttypesshouldbechosen–writtenand/orspoken?Whatshouldbethesourceofthese,thesupposedaudience,thetopics,thedegreeofauthenticity?Howlongordifficultshouldtheybe?Howcomplexshouldthelanguagebe?6)Whatlanguageskillsshouldbetested?Aremicroskillsspecified,andshoulditemsbedesignedtotesttheseindividuallyorinsomeintegratedfashion?7)Whatlanguageelementsshouldbetested?Aregrammaticalstructures,lexis,notionsandfunctions,speechactsorpragmaticfeaturesspecified?8)Whatsortoftasksarerequired–discretepoint,integrative,simulated‘a(chǎn)uthentic’,objectivelyassessable?
9)Howmanyitemsarerequiredforeachsection?Whatistherelativeweightforeachitem–equalweighting,extraweightingformoredifficultitems?10)Whattestmethodsaretobeused–multiplechoice,gapfilling,matching,transformation,shortanswerquestion,picturedescription,roleplaywithcuecards,essay,structuredwriting?11)Whatrubricsaretobeusedasinstructionsforcandidates?Willexamplesberequiredtohelpcandidatesknowwhatisexpected?Shouldthecriteriabywhichcandidateswillbeassessedbeincludedintherubric?12)Whichcriteriawillbeusedforassessmentbymarkers?Howimportantisaccuracy,appropriacy,spelling,lengthofutterance/script,etc.
UnderstandingRubricsWhatIsaRubric?
Arubricisascoringtoolthatliststhecriteriaforapieceofwork,or"whatcounts"(forexample,purpose,organization,details,voice,andmechanicsareoftenwhatcountinapieceofwriting);italsoarticulatesgradationsofqualityforeachcriterion,fromexcellenttopoor.Rubric:intestsandinstructionalmaterial,theinstructiontothestudentwhatheorshehastodotocompleteataskoractivity(新版朗文語言教學與應用語言學詞典,2003)rubric即可作為考生答題指南,又可作為教師評卷依據(jù)。example:Thereportmustexplain(1)thepurposesoftheinvention,(2)thefeaturesorpartsoftheinventionandhowtheyhelpitserveitspurposes,(3)theprosandconsofthedesign,and(4)howthedesignconnectstootherthingspast,present,andfuture.Therubriccouldeasilyincludecriteriarelatedtopresentationstyleandeffectiveness,themechanicsofwrittenpieces,andthequalityoftheinventionitself.
WhyUseRubrics?
Rubricsappealtoteachersandstudentsformanyreasons:First,theyarepowerfultoolsforbothteachingandassessment.Rubricscanimprovestudentperformance,aswellasmonitorit,bymakingteachers'expectationsclearandbyshowingstudentshowtomeettheseexpectations.Theresultisoftenmarkedimprovementsinthequalityofstudentworkandinlearning.Thus,themostcommonargumentforusingrubricsistheyhelpdefine"quality."Asecondreasonthatrubricsareusefulisthattheyhelpstudentsemorethoughtfuljudgesofthequalityoftheirownandothers'work.Whenrubricsareusedtoguideself-andpeer-assessment,studentseincreasinglyabletospotandsolveproblemsintheirownandoneanother'swork.Repeatedpracticewithpeer-assessment,andespeciallyself-assessment,increasesstudents'senseofresponsibilityfortheirownwork.Andrubricsprovidestudentswithmoreinformativefeedbackabouttheirstrengthsandareasinneedofimprovement.
Third,rubricsreducetheamountoftimeteachersspendevaluatingstudentwork.Teacherstendtofindthatbythetimeapiecehasbeenself-andpeer-assessedaccordingtoarubric,theyhavelittlelefttosayaboutit.Whentheydohavesomethingtosay,theycanoftensimplycircleanitemintherubric,ratherthanstrugglingtoexplaintheflaworstrengththeyhavenoticedandfiguringoutwhattosuggestintermsofimprovements.Fourth,teachersappreciaterubricsbecausetheir"accordion"natureallowsthemtomodateheterogeneousclasses.Theexamplesherehavethreeorfourgradationsofquality,butthereisnoreasontheycan'tbe"stretched"toreflecttheworkofbothgiftedstudentsandthosewithlearningdisabilities.Finally,rubricsareeasyforbothstudentsandtheirparentstouseinexplainingwhattheyhavelearned.Howtocreaterubrics?
1.Lookatmodels:Showexamplesofgoodandnot-so-goodwork.Identifythecharacteristicsthatmakethegoodonesgoodandthebadonesbad.2.Listcriteria:Usethediscussionofmodelstobeginalistofwhatcountsinqualitywork.3.Articulategradationsofquality:Describethebestandworstlevelsofquality,thenfillinthemiddlelevelsbasedonyourknowledgeofcommonproblemsandthediscussionofnot-so-goodwork.4.Practiceonmodels:Usetherubricstoevaluatethemodelsgiven.5.Useself-andpeer-assessment:Givestudentstheirassignment.Astheywork,stopthemoccasionallyforself-andpeer-assessment.6.Revise:AlwaysgivestudentstimetorevisetheirworkbasedonthefeedbacktheygetinStep5.7.Useteacherassessment:Usethesamerubricstudentsusedtoassesstheirworkyourself.
Problemsinlanguagetesting1)Nosingleapproachtolanguagetestingisuniversallyaccepted.2)Languagetestingisusuallybasedonlimitedsamplesofbehavior.3)Themeasurementobtainedisalwayssubjecttoerror:samplingerrors,scoringerrors,etc.4)Theunitsofscoresarenotwellde
溫馨提示
- 1. 本站所有資源如無特殊說明,都需要本地電腦安裝OFFICE2007和PDF閱讀器。圖紙軟件為CAD,CAXA,PROE,UG,SolidWorks等.壓縮文件請下載最新的WinRAR軟件解壓。
- 2. 本站的文檔不包含任何第三方提供的附件圖紙等,如果需要附件,請聯(lián)系上傳者。文件的所有權益歸上傳用戶所有。
- 3. 本站RAR壓縮包中若帶圖紙,網(wǎng)頁內(nèi)容里面會有圖紙預覽,若沒有圖紙預覽就沒有圖紙。
- 4. 未經(jīng)權益所有人同意不得將文件中的內(nèi)容挪作商業(yè)或盈利用途。
- 5. 人人文庫網(wǎng)僅提供信息存儲空間,僅對用戶上傳內(nèi)容的表現(xiàn)方式做保護處理,對用戶上傳分享的文檔內(nèi)容本身不做任何修改或編輯,并不能對任何下載內(nèi)容負責。
- 6. 下載文件中如有侵權或不適當內(nèi)容,請與我們聯(lián)系,我們立即糾正。
- 7. 本站不保證下載資源的準確性、安全性和完整性, 同時也不承擔用戶因使用這些下載資源對自己和他人造成任何形式的傷害或損失。
最新文檔
- 工程款付款流程審批單
- 古拉爾氏水稀次醋酸鉛溶液相關項目實施方案
- 卵磷脂膳食補充劑相關項目實施方案
- 臺球用白堊項目可行性實施報告
- 積極心理學心得體會12篇
- Ethyl-6-oxospiro-3-3-heptane-2-carboxylate-生命科學試劑-MCE
- DSPE-PEG-OH-MW-3400-生命科學試劑-MCE
- 發(fā)光極管照明器具相關項目建議書
- 農(nóng)業(yè)用殺菌劑項目可行性實施報告
- 制鋼絲繩機項目可行性實施報告
- 小學英語課程與教學論(小學教育專業(yè))PPT完整全套教學課件
- 坐井觀天第一課時教學設計匯集8篇
- 創(chuàng)新實踐(理論)學習通超星課后章節(jié)答案期末考試題庫2023年
- 06 菊花扦插(教學設計)六年級上冊綜合實踐活動勞動課程蘇教版
- 2023年住院醫(yī)師規(guī)范化培訓督導骨干專家模擬評估培訓班測試題
- 浙教版七年級數(shù)學上冊《合并同類項》教案及教學反思
- 中學語文教學人文素養(yǎng)與語文素養(yǎng)的雙向培養(yǎng)
- 退役軍人事務局一體化平臺解決方案
- 園林綠化工程公司倉庫保管員管理制度
- 房地產(chǎn)項目竣工驗收全過程詳解
- ISO9001質(zhì)量管理體系理解與實施要求
評論
0/150
提交評論