版權(quán)法領(lǐng)域中“接觸權(quán)”存廢問題研究,版權(quán)法論文

版權(quán)法領(lǐng)域中“接觸權(quán)〞存廢問題研究,版權(quán)法論文【題目】版權(quán)法領(lǐng)域中接觸權(quán)存廢問題研究【引言論文的重點(diǎn)。在該部分，筆者采用了正面講理以及反面批判的論證方式，結(jié)合國內(nèi)外發(fā)生的典型案例，批判了有關(guān)接觸權(quán)存在的法理根據(jù)和正當(dāng)理由在版權(quán)法專有權(quán)利體系下是難以立足的，進(jìn)而講明了有關(guān)接觸權(quán)存在的論調(diào)是難以自圓其講的。無論是過去還是如今，或是將來的版權(quán)法體系都不可能接納接觸權(quán)成為其詳細(xì)內(nèi)容。在文章的最后章節(jié)，筆者立足于接觸權(quán)存在與否的爭論，發(fā)散地展開思路，希望文章本身不僅僅停留在對(duì)于接觸權(quán)本身的認(rèn)識(shí)之上，通過對(duì)于國內(nèi)外案例的分析比照，以及對(duì)于創(chuàng)設(shè)接觸權(quán)于版權(quán)專有權(quán)利之下的批判，筆者希望本文能夠?qū)ξ覀儑椰F(xiàn)行的著作權(quán)法中的相關(guān)規(guī)定有所借鑒意義，無論是立法者還是學(xué)者們，都能夠從中得到啟發(fā)，以便更好地保證我們國家的版權(quán)法體系得以不斷地發(fā)展和完善。【本文本文關(guān)鍵詞語語】版權(quán)法專有權(quán)利接觸權(quán)正當(dāng)性AbstractAsanimportantpartoftheintellectualpropertysystem,copyrightsbirthanddevelopmentistightlyrelatedwiththeprocessofscienceandtechnology.Thecopyrightsystemitselfisaresultofthedevelopmentofscienceandtechnology.Theinventionofprintingmakeacopywithgreatquantityandlesscostpossible,italsomakecopyrightprotectiontobenecessary.Afterthebirthofcopyrightsystem,thedevelopmentofscienceandtechnologyisalwayschallengingthecopyrightsystemconstantly.Thecopyrightsystemisalsocontinuouslydevelopingintheprocessofrespondingtothechallenge.Followingwiththetechnicalmeansconstantinnovationandinformationsacceleratedthenetworkisdestinedtoinduceatechnologicalrevolutionatthemomentofitsbirthcomparedtotraditionalmeansofcommunication.Therapiddevelopmentofnetworktechnologydisseminateknowledgerapidly,whichbuildsabroadnetworkoftechnicalbackgroundandenrichtherouteoftransmissionintheknowledgeeconomicera.Theinherentqualityandtypicalcharacteristicsofintellectualpropertyleadtoaprofoundinfluenceandafullrangeinnovation.Thedevelopmentofnetworktechnologymakesitmucheasierforthepublicaccesstocopyrightworks.Inordertoadapttheimpactofnetworktechnologiesontheprotectionofcopyrightworks,copyrightobligeesarebeginningtoimposetechnicalmeasurestoprotecttheirworks.However,technicalmeasuresisfarfrombestmeansofprotectionofcopyrightworksforall,therefore,thecryforcreationanaccessrightisarisinggradually.Asfordisputesontheexistenceofaccessrightsinthefieldofcopyrightlaw,theauthorprovidedadetailedelaborationandargumentinthearticle.Inthefirstpart,theauthorfirstintroducesthebackgroundoftheaccessrightandtheintroductionofitsmeaning,wherethebackgroundofthedisputeonaccessrighthasbeendirectlypresentedtothereader,andintroducesdifferentdefinitionofaccessrights.Meanwhile,theauthordiscussescontemporaryscholarsdifferentaccountofcreationofaccessrights,focusingontheintroductionoftherelevantargumentsofsupporters.Atthesametime,theauthorgivesahorizontalcomparisontheviewsofthosewithopposingviewstotheoneofsupporters.Theauthorinsistontheexistofthelegitimacywithrespectoftheaccessrightexistisbasedoncontacttechnicalmeasureandaccessrightsareinherentrightsoftheintellectualpropertyinthecopyrightlawsystemrhetoric.Meanwhile,scholarsclarifiedthedifferencebetweenrightsandpowerinthelegalsense.Atthesecondpart,theauthordiscussesthattheaccessrightscannotbeincludedincopyrightlaw,whichisthefocusofthewholethesis.Theauthoradoptsapositiveandnegativecriticalreasoningmethodrespectivelyandcriticizesthatthelegalbasisandthejustificationontheexistenceofaccessrightinthesystemofintellectualpropertyundercopyrightlawisdifficulttogainafootholdbycombiningthetypicalcases,whichshowsthattheexistenceofaccessrightintheargumentisdifficulttojustify.Inspiteofpast,presentorfuturecopyrightlawsystemcannotaccepttheaccessrightsasitsspecificcontent.Inthelastchapter,theauthorstartsthinkingbasedonthedebateconcerningtheexistenceofaccessrights.Theauthorhopesthearticleitselfdoesnotmerelystayontheissueoftheaccessrightsaccordingtotheirownknowledgethroughtheanalysisandcomparisonofinternationalcases,andforthecreationofaccessrightsundertheexclusiverightsofcopyrightcriticism,theauthorhopesthiscanprovidelessonsfromtheexistingrelevantprovisionsoftheCopyrightLawSystemtoeitherlegislatorsorscholars,whocanbeinspiredfromthatinordertoensureourcopyrightlawsystemtobedevelopedandimproved.【Keywords】ExclusiveRightsunderCopyrightSystemAccessrightLegitimacy目錄引言第一章接觸權(quán)問題的概述第一節(jié)接觸權(quán)問題產(chǎn)生的背景第二節(jié)有關(guān)接觸權(quán)淵源的爭議一、接觸權(quán)之權(quán)利講二、接觸權(quán)之技術(shù)保衛(wèi)措施基礎(chǔ)講第三節(jié)接觸權(quán)含義的界定一、美國Corley案二、接觸行為是版權(quán)作品后續(xù)利用行為的前提第二章版權(quán)體系下接觸權(quán)的正當(dāng)性分析第一節(jié)接觸權(quán)尚未被版權(quán)法體系所接納一、接觸權(quán)并非暗含在現(xiàn)有版權(quán)權(quán)利體系的一種固有的權(quán)利二、接觸控制技術(shù)措施并非接觸權(quán)存在的合理根據(jù)三、不能將接觸權(quán)視為對(duì)傳統(tǒng)版權(quán)財(cái)產(chǎn)權(quán)的補(bǔ)充第二節(jié)接觸權(quán)納入版權(quán)法體