版權(quán)說(shuō)明:本文檔由用戶提供并上傳,收益歸屬內(nèi)容提供方,若內(nèi)容存在侵權(quán),請(qǐng)進(jìn)行舉報(bào)或認(rèn)領(lǐng)
文檔簡(jiǎn)介
千里之行,始于足下讓知識(shí)帶有溫度。第第2頁(yè)/共2頁(yè)精品文檔推薦信建議寫法SomeyearsagoIwastalkingtoavisitingscholarwhowasafacultymemberinaforeigncountry.Iaskedherwhylettersfromhercountryseemedtobesouninformative.Shepointedoutthatthere,facultyneverreadletters:theyonlywritethem.Evengraduatestudentsareadmittedpurelyonthebasisoftestscores.
Thefactswerehardlysurprising—afterall,thisisthesystemIgrewupwithinIndia—butafterhearingthewaysheputit,theproverbialbulblitup.Ifyouneverevaluatelettersyourself,howwouldyouknowwhatlettersshouldandshouldn'tcontain?Thefeedback—admissiondecisions—isseeminglyrandom,andthereforeoflittleuse.Hencethisarticle.
Disclaimer:Thisisanextremelypersonalopinion.Itdoesn'trepresenttheviewsofmydepartmentormyuniversity.Moreimportantly,manyfacultymaydisagreewiththeopinionshere,sousethemwithcaution!Feedbackwelcome.
Whatthisdocumentisabout:WritingeffectiverecommendationlettersforPhDstudentsapplyingtocomputersciencePhDprogramsintheUS.
Whomthisisfor:Letter-writerswhoareunsureofwhatmakesforagoodletter.Thismayalsohelpstudentspreparebetterdossierstogivetheirletter-writers.
(Abravestudentmightevenpointherletter-writertothisarticle.)
Alsoread:MorHarchol-Balter'scomments,MichaelErnst'sadvice.
WhyLettersMatter
Doesanyonereadthelettersatall?Wedo,rigorously,sometimesascarefullyaswereadaresearchpaper:peninhand,circlingcomments,annotatingmargins,notingwhattheletterdidanddidn'tsay.
Infact,lettersaresoimportant,evenabadtranscriptcanbeoffsetbythem.Iknowastudentwhogotintoafinegraduateprogramwithjusta2.67GPA.Thisisbecausehis2.67wasspecial:heacedhardclassesandgotboredineasyones.Hisletterspresumablysaidso,andillustratedthiswithseveralanecdotes.So,notevery2.67isequal,andyourstudent'smaybeofjusttherightkind;butwewon'tknowthatwithoutyourletter.
MyConstraints(or,TheOne-MinuteRule)
WhenI'monthecommittee,Itrytoreadeveryapplication;whenIchairit,ImakesureIdo,somemultipletimes.That'smanyhundredsofapplicationsinunderamonth.Factorinlotsandlotsoflateletters,classes,etc.,andit'sclearIhavetoworkprettyfast.
Forthefirstpass—decidingwhethertheapplicationdeservesmoretimeornot—Icanaffordtospendnomorethanabout6-7minutesperapplication.(KeepinmindI'vereadmaybeafewthousandapplications,soI'vehadpractice.)IfIdecidetheapplicationispromising,Imayspendoverhalfanhour(insomecases,days!)onit.Butinthosefirst6-7minutes,Ihaveto:
?eyeballthestudent'sresearchrecord
?formasummaryofthetranscript
?glanceatthestandardizedtestscores
?determinewhetherthestatementispromising
?getthegistof2-3lettersofrecommendation
Inpractice,thatmeansIhaveaboutoneminutetodevotetothefirstreadingofyourletter.Nowthinkaboutwhetheryourletterworksinthiscontext.(Forinstance,someletterwritersputabig,prominentparagraphofboilerplatelegaleseatthebeginningoftheirletter,whichIhavetoreadbeforeIrealizeit'sirrelevant.Couldyouhaveburiedthatinapostscript?Wasthatthebestuseofmyminute?)
CallthistheOne-MinuteRuleandwrite,read,andre-readyourletteragainstthisrulebeforesendingitin.
BeConcrete
Ifyoutakeawayjustonepieceofconcreteadvice,letitbethis.
Thesinglebiggestproblemwithmostlettersisthattheyarefilledwithabstractgeneralitiesandinfinitives.Ifwedon'tknowyouoryourinstitution,wecan'tjudgewhatanyofthesestatementsmeanrelativetoourstandards.Alwaysconsidertheillustrativeanecdote:
Duetodeadlinepressure,Iaskedhimtogrowapumpkininjustonemonth.Asyouknowittakesover100daystogrowapumpkin,butovertheweekendhedevisedanewmethodtoacceleratetheirgrowth.OnMondaymorningIarrivedtofindnotjustapumpkinbutasteaming,flavorfulpie.
Anecdoteaboutactsofrawcodingareonlysohelpfulinunderstandingresearchpotential,butthey'rebetterthannothing(seethesectiononCorporateLetters,below).Anextrabookorpapertheyread,anddemonstratedunderstandingof(again,beconcreteaboutwhyyoubelievethis),goesalongway.
TriangulationandCredibility
Whenwereadaletterwe'resupposedlyevaluatingthestudent,butwe'reactuallyevaluatingtheletter-writertoo.WhatIcareaboutisnotonlywhatyouthink,butalsowhatIthinkofwhatyouthink.IfIdon'tknowyou,Ineedtocalibrateyou.
Ofcourse,sometimesinformationcanhurt.Ifyoupraiseresearchthatisnoharderthanwhatweassignourfirst-yearundergraduatestudents,thattellsusalotaboutyourprogram,butnotalotpositive.Isawpreciselysuchaletterbackinabout2022;tothisday,Icannamethecollege(andthestudent...).Untilthatprogrambecomesawholelotstronger,Iwouldn'twanttoadmitanyonefromit.
Ifyou'vebeenholdingbackpraise,tellus:Ifyouhaven'twrittenaletterthisstrongsince1998,andyou'vewrittentwodozenlettersinthattime,ithelpsforustoknowthat.Ofcourse,behonest.Ifwetakeyouatyourwordandyourstudentprovestobesignificantlyweakerthanyourletter,wewon'ttrustyourfuturerecommendations.
Italsohelpstoknowyourtrackrecord.Especiallyifyouareaprofessoratalesser-knownuniversity,telluswhereyourpastgraduateshavegone.Evenbetter,telluswheretheyarenow(maybethelackofname-recognitionforyourschoolmeansthestudentsdidn'tgotowell-knownplacesinitially,butiftheydidwellandarenowplacedingoodpositions,that'sgoodtoknow).Remembertocomparethisstudenttothatpopulation.
Finally,tellusalittleaboutyourbackground.Abriefparaofbio-sketchneverhurts.Ifyoupublishpapers,telluswhere.Butkeepitshort:theletterisaboutthestudent,notyou!
Ultimately,remembertwothings:
?Yourmostvaluableresourceisyourcredibility.Ifyouareacredibleletter-writer,wewilltakeyouatyourwordand,ifonedayyoutellusabout
astellarstudent,wewilldoeverythingwecantomakeroomforher.But
credibilityisone-way:hardtoacquire,easytolose.
?Youcan'tgetastudentin,butyoucanmakeastudentnotgetin.Thatis,thereisonlysomuchyoucansaytogetastudentadmitted,butifwecometodistrustyourletter,yournextstudentisgoingtohaveamuchhardertimegettingin.For“you”,substituteyourinstitutionalso.
ReportingonResearch
Atahighly-competitiveuniversitylikeBrown,wewanttoknowthestudent'sresearchpotential.Thebestassessmentofthisiswhattheyhavealreadydone.Ifyouaretheirresearchadvisor,youhaveaspecialobligationtothem(andtous)inyourletter:
?describetheirworkinyourownwords
?telluswhatthestudent'scontributionwas
?telluswhetheritsucceededorfailed
?ifit'songoing,telluswhyyouthinkitwillsucceed
Werarelyexpecttheideastohaveoriginatedfromthestudent,butwewouldliketoseesignsthattheytookownershipoftheproject,improveditinsomeway,refinedtheidea,andsoon.Finally:
?putanypublicationsincontext
Studentsdon'talwaysknowhowtodothis.Ifyoupublishedapaperonthework,tellusaboutthequalityofthevenue.Inparticular,studentsarepoorattellingdifferentkindsofpublicationsapart(techreportfromconferenceposterfromresearchpaper)andmayeventrytohidethedistinction(I'veseenthishappen).Helpusunderstandwhattheyreallyaccomplished.
Ifyourunasummerresearchcenter,youmaygetbombardedwithletterrequestsfromeachofyourstudents.Ihaveseensuchpeoplewriteperfunctoryone-paragraphletters.Thesehurtstudents,andareultimatelyunethical.Someonegaveyoumoneytorunthatcenter;whenyouaskedforit,youtookonanobligation.Fulfillit,orelsegetoutoftheway.Thereareplentyofotherswhowillgladlyputthatmoneytobetteruse.
ReportingonCourses
Naturally,yourmostsignificantcontactwiththestudentislikelytobeincourses.Yetwhatcouldbearichsourceofdescriptionisoftenthepoorest:MorHarchol-BalterreportsthatatCMU,theycallacertainclassofthese“DWIC”letters(“didwellinclass”),whichareeffectivelyuseless.
Giveuscontext.Whattextbookdidyouuse?Howmuchofitdidyoucover?Didthestudenttakeitearlierthanusual?
Don'tjustreportthegrade;putitinperspective.Howmanystudentsgotthatgradeorbetter?Ifyourtranscriptisn'tnuanced(e.g.,atBrownwegiveonlylettergradeswithno+/-decorations),fillitin.Didtheydoanexceptionaljobatsomething?(Telluswhattheydid!)Weretheybiasedtowardssomeaspectofyourclass?(Forinstance,inmyprogramminglanguagescourse,sometakemuchbettertothetheoreticalaspects,whileotherspreferthesystemswork.Thetranscriptwon'trevealthis,butit'sextremelyvaluableinformationforaprofessortryingtodecidewhetherornottorecruitastudent.)
ReportingonPersonality
Thisistricky,butitcanhelpapotentialadvisorassesshowgoodafitthestudentwillbe.Someadvisorsworkbestwithquiet,shystudents,otherswithboisterousones.Beashonestasnecessary.Forinstance,I'vehadthepleasureofworkingwithnumerousexceptionalstudents,butafewhavehadmorepeculiarpersonalitiesthanthenorm.Insuchcases,Iwritea“careandfeeding”section(thisgoesbacktothebitaboutcredibility).Ihaveneveryetknownthistobeheldagainstthestudent.
CorporateLetters
Animportantspecialcaseisthecorporateletter:whenyou,theletter-writer,workinindustryandhavenoacademicaffiliation.Manycorporateletters(likemanyacademicletters,butmoreso)tendtobevapid,clearlywritteninadifferentcultureandforadifferentaudience.Unlesstheyactuallydidacademicresearchwithyou,herearesomesuggestionsforimprovingthem.
Acommonmistakeistofocusonteamwork.Thisisimportanteveninacademia,butoftenthisistheprimaryfocusoftheletter,whichmakesitlessvaluable.Ofcoursewecareaboutit,butit'ssecondarytotheirtechnicalskills.
?Tellusiftheylearnedsomethingparticularlyquickly,masteredacomplextechnology,orsolvedaproblemotherswerestuckon.Giveusaparagraphofdetails.
?Ifyouhaveaconcretereasontoevaluateresearchpotential,dosoconcretely.
Otherwise,don'tbother.
?Giveusabriefbio-sketch,includingeducationalqualifications.
?Puttheapplicantincontext,andtellusthecontext.It'sfinetorelateittoyourownstudentdays,ortoyourexperiencehiringstudents.E.g.:
ComparedtothestudentsIstudiedwithatCucumberandMelonUniversity,andtheonesInowrecruitfromthere,Iwouldputhiminthetop10%.
Don'tPersonalize(or,HowtoPersonalize)
Don'twasteyourtimepersonalizingtheletterforeachschool,unlessyoureallypersonalizeit.I'mnotimpressedbyyourmail-mergeprogram.Absolutelynobodycaresthatyoudon'tlistBrown'spostaladdressatthetopoftheletter.Spendthatextraminuteorfivemakingtheletterbetter.Besides,invariably,youwillmessup:everyyearwegetahandfuloflettersstuffedinthewrongenvelope.(Just
becausethey'regoodenoughforHarvarddoesn'tmeanthey'regoodenoughforus!
[IhopeGregMorrisettdoesn'treadthis.])
Ofcourse,youcouldreallypersonalizealetterbywritingaparagraphspecifictoaninstitution.Butonlydothisifyoureallyhavesomethingtosay.Forinstance,Isometimeswrite,
Heyfolks—EvaEchidnaismorededicatedthanJonasJackarooandeverybitassmartasWalterWallaby,bothofwhomarepaststudentsofminewhoappeartobethrivinginyourprogram.
YoucoulddothiswithLaTeXorWordmacrotrickery,butyouknowwhatIdo?Ijustwritetheparagraphbyhand.It'squicker,easier,andevenhasthefeelofauthenticity,becauseeveryoneknowsprofessorscan'taffordmachinesthatsimulatehand-writing:onlyalumniofficeshavethatkindofmoneyoncampus.
Asimpler,butalsoimportant,levelofpersonalizationistotakeintoaccountthequalityofthetargetinstitution.Sometimes,studentsapplytoschoolswellbeyondtheirquality,andyoumaynotbeabletotalkthemoutofit(nor,perhaps,shouldyou;they'rejustexercisingtheirfreedom).Youmayconsiderhavingslightlydifferentletters,oneforeachlevelofinstitution.Acheapwaytoachievethesameeffectistosimplymarkdifferentboxesinthetablesyou'reaskedtofillin(e.g.,marktheminahigherpercentileforschoolswhereyouthinktheybelong,andalowerpercentileforplaceswheretheywillbeovermatched).
Whilewe'reatit,here'sagreatinstanceofcustomizationgonewrong(theellipsesaremine,therestisliteraltext):
Itismypleasuretorecommend...beadmittedtothePhDinComputerScienceprogramatBrownUniversity.IamanassociateprofessorintheDepartmentofComputerScience,theUniversityof...,whereIhavetaughtfor[THISMANY]years.
Didn'tevenproof-readit,eh?
AskYourStudentforHelp
Ahyes!Here'swhereItellyoutoaskthestudenttowriteadraftoftheirownletter.Not.
AskingstudentstowriteevenadraftoftheirownletterisoneoftheshabbiestpracticesIcanimagine.Yes,Iknow,manyotherwiserespectablepeopledoit(I'veevenhadmorethanoneletter-writerofmine—peopleIrespectprofoundly—askmeto).I'veheardargumentsabouthowithelpsastudentdemonstrateprofessionalism,maturity,andsoon.Thisisn'ttheplacetoexplainwhyI'mcompletelyunswayed.
SowhatdoImean?
Itellmystudentstogivemealistofeverythingaboutthemthattheythinkisrelevant.Iexplicitlytellthemtobrag(somestudentsareshyandmaynotgivethemselvesenoughcreditotherwise):filteringtheirinputismyjob,nottheirs,andIsayso.SometimesIdogetitemsthatareover-the-top,butnoharmdone.MuchmoreoftenastudentwillremindmeofsomethingtheydidthatIhadforgotten,butwaswellworthremembering.
Inparticular,formytopresearchstudentswhoarecurrentlyworkingwithme,Ihavenoshortageofinformation.Butfortheothers,oronesIhaven'tworkedwithinawhile,thishelpsimmensely.Someitemsuddenlybringsthemaliveafterseveralyears,helpingmereconstructforgottendetailsandprovideanillustrationortwo.
TellUsAboutRelevantThingsThatDidn'tHappen
Sometimesthenegativespacesalsomatter:astatementlike
Despitemybesteffortstopersuadehertoworkwithme,EvadecidedtospendhersecondsummerworkingfortheRockyRaccoonCorporation,alocalmakerofsurveillanceequipment.BecauseofthisIcannotsaymuchaboutherresearchskills,butI'mtoldshedidgoodworkthere.Moreover,herexperienceinindustryconvincedhershewouldratherbeingraduateschool.
can,insomecontexts,tellthereaderalot.
HelpYourStudentsFormaStrategy
It'sveryfrustratingtogetthreeessentiallyidenticalletters.Ifyouaretheadvisor(orevensimplysomeonewhothinksthestudentdeservestodowell),takealittletimetohelpstudentsplanouttheirapplicationstrategy.Askthemwhotheirotherwritersare,helpthemfindwriterswhocanhighlightalltheirstrengths,andidentifypointlessoverlap.Summarizeanythingyouthinkweshouldknowabout:e.g.,
IknowthatEvadidasuperbprojectwithProfDolfenfuss—Iwasblownawaybythecreativityoftheirworkonintrusiondetectionforraccoonsthatraidpumpkinpatches.She'stoldmeshehasaskedDr.D.foraletter,soItrusthewillelaborate.
JustSayNo
Don'twritealetterbecauseyou'refeelingbadlyforastudent.Wecantellfromyourletter,anditwon'thelpthestudentonebit.Justsayno.Ifyoureallycare
forthestudent,spendthattimeinsteadhelpinghimfindletter-writerswhocanbettergetacrosshistalents.Heck,maybeheshouldn'tbeapplyingtograduateschoolatall,atleastnotrightnow.Afewminutesofyourtimemaysavehimyearsofhis.
PracticetheFundamentals
Mailthedarnedthinginontime!Wedon'tbegintoreadapplicationsuntiltheyare“sufficientlycomplete”tobeworththetime.Whileyou'recraftingyourprosefortheParisReview(andfidgetingwiththedetailsofyourmailmergeprogram),yourstudent'sfolderisbecomingclosefriendswiththehistoric,200+-year-old,pre-RevolutionaryWardustinthecornerofsomeofficebuildingatBrown.
YourEssay/PersonalStatement/StatementofPurpose你的文書
1.TheBasics基本信息:
TOEFL:_______
IELTS:_______
GRE:_______
GMAT:_______
GPA(yourGPA/FullGPA):_______/_______
Rank(yourrank/totalnumberofstudentsinyourmajororclass):_______/_______
2.You了解你自己
lWhatthingsinyourlifeareyoumostproudof?
在你的生活中,什么事讓你最驕傲?
lWhatwouldyourbestfriendsayareyourverybestqualities?
在你的好伴侶眼里,你最好的品質(zhì)是什么?
lWhatisthebiggestchallengeyouhavefacedandhowdidyouovercomeit?
你遭受的最大挑戰(zhàn)是什么,你是如何完成它的?
3.Academicactivities學(xué)術(shù)活動(dòng)
lWhydidyouchooseyourmajor?
你為什么挑選你現(xiàn)在的專業(yè)?
lHaveyougonebeyondwhatisrequiredofyoubythecurriculumatanytime?Pleasedescribe.
你有沒(méi)有做出過(guò)超出課程要求的努力?請(qǐng)描述。
lWhatwerethehighpointsofyourundergraduatestudy?
你的本科學(xué)習(xí)過(guò)程中取得過(guò)什么成就讓你尤為自豪?
lWhatareasofyourmajorparticularlymotivateyou?
你所學(xué)(選)專業(yè)的哪方面讓你特殊有愛(ài)好?
lWhatdoyouseeas
溫馨提示
- 1. 本站所有資源如無(wú)特殊說(shuō)明,都需要本地電腦安裝OFFICE2007和PDF閱讀器。圖紙軟件為CAD,CAXA,PROE,UG,SolidWorks等.壓縮文件請(qǐng)下載最新的WinRAR軟件解壓。
- 2. 本站的文檔不包含任何第三方提供的附件圖紙等,如果需要附件,請(qǐng)聯(lián)系上傳者。文件的所有權(quán)益歸上傳用戶所有。
- 3. 本站RAR壓縮包中若帶圖紙,網(wǎng)頁(yè)內(nèi)容里面會(huì)有圖紙預(yù)覽,若沒(méi)有圖紙預(yù)覽就沒(méi)有圖紙。
- 4. 未經(jīng)權(quán)益所有人同意不得將文件中的內(nèi)容挪作商業(yè)或盈利用途。
- 5. 人人文庫(kù)網(wǎng)僅提供信息存儲(chǔ)空間,僅對(duì)用戶上傳內(nèi)容的表現(xiàn)方式做保護(hù)處理,對(duì)用戶上傳分享的文檔內(nèi)容本身不做任何修改或編輯,并不能對(duì)任何下載內(nèi)容負(fù)責(zé)。
- 6. 下載文件中如有侵權(quán)或不適當(dāng)內(nèi)容,請(qǐng)與我們聯(lián)系,我們立即糾正。
- 7. 本站不保證下載資源的準(zhǔn)確性、安全性和完整性, 同時(shí)也不承擔(dān)用戶因使用這些下載資源對(duì)自己和他人造成任何形式的傷害或損失。
最新文檔
- 建筑涂料工程皮卡租賃合同
- 藥物研發(fā)學(xué)徒技能提升計(jì)劃
- 貿(mào)易余款償還協(xié)議
- 2022年大學(xué)能源動(dòng)力專業(yè)大學(xué)物理下冊(cè)月考試卷A卷-附解析
- 結(jié)直腸狹窄內(nèi)鏡治療
- 垃圾問(wèn)題與學(xué)校教育的整合與創(chuàng)新
- 2022年大學(xué)電子信息科學(xué)專業(yè)大學(xué)物理二期中考試試卷-含答案
- 2022年大學(xué)環(huán)境生態(tài)專業(yè)大學(xué)物理二期末考試試卷D卷-含答案
- 消化道疾病的護(hù)理常規(guī)
- 智能餐廳解決方案
- 乳品加工奶油加工
- 人教版六年數(shù)學(xué)上冊(cè) 分?jǐn)?shù)簡(jiǎn)便計(jì)算40題(有解析)
- 成品油消費(fèi)稅主要政策
- 履帶吊駕駛員安全三級(jí)教育
- MSAGRR數(shù)據(jù)自動(dòng)生成工具(已經(jīng)解密)
- 微課腳本設(shè)計(jì)案例
- 小學(xué)生語(yǔ)文課前預(yù)習(xí)的有效性研究中期報(bào)告
- ISO 14971-2019 醫(yī)療器械 風(fēng)險(xiǎn)管理對(duì)醫(yī)療器械的應(yīng)用 -中文版
- 投資預(yù)算(投入預(yù)算
- 教師課堂語(yǔ)言的規(guī)范與技巧
- 綠色垃圾分類全民行動(dòng)環(huán)保低碳愛(ài)護(hù)環(huán)境內(nèi)容PPT匯報(bào)
評(píng)論
0/150
提交評(píng)論