2023名校版高考英語閱讀理解精讀含答案m_第1頁
2023名校版高考英語閱讀理解精讀含答案m_第2頁
2023名校版高考英語閱讀理解精讀含答案m_第3頁
2023名校版高考英語閱讀理解精讀含答案m_第4頁
2023名校版高考英語閱讀理解精讀含答案m_第5頁
已閱讀5頁,還剩2頁未讀 繼續(xù)免費(fèi)閱讀

下載本文檔

版權(quán)說明:本文檔由用戶提供并上傳,收益歸屬內(nèi)容提供方,若內(nèi)容存在侵權(quán),請進(jìn)行舉報或認(rèn)領(lǐng)

文檔簡介

2023名校版高考英語閱讀理解精讀含答案Imagineaworld

where

everythinghastheirown

virtual,real-timecomputerizedreplica(替身)—adigitaldouble.Thatconceptis

knownas

thedigitaltwinanditcouldprovideawaytoimproveourlivesintherealworld.Morethanjust

imitation,digitaltwinstakeinformationfromInternet-connectedobjectsthroughInternetofThings(IoT)devices,usedataalmost

instantly

toseetheeffectsofchangingconditionsandthenmake

adjustments

rapidly.Inconstruction,thedigitaltwinmeansbuildingsbecome

safer

andcheapertobuildbecausedigitaltwins

haveaccessto

realweather,structuralandstresspointdata.BridgesliketheQueensferryCrossinginScotland,forexample,usemeasurementsofwaterlevelandwindspeedtoimprovesafetyandmanagetrafficflow.Connectedbuildingsthenmakesmartcities,

where

buildingstalktooneanotherandfuturefunctioncanbepredicted.InAustralia’sstateofVictoria,localgovernmentisbuildingadigitaltwinoftheentirestate.Manufacturingisanothersectorbeingaffectedbydigitaltwintechnology.Placingthousandsof

sensors

throughouttheproductionlineallowscompaniestoseehowworkisperformedateachstepoftheprocess,system

efficiency

andany

bottlenecks.Likewise,inhealthcare,thedigitaltwinconceptmeanscreatingcomputermodelsofdiseaseorevena

virtual

humanbody.

Personalized

medicinesortreatmentscouldthenbedevelopedusingamedicaltwinofeachpatient.Andevenhealthproblemscouldbecutoutbeforetheybegin.“Ithink

maintaining

a

persistent

setofcomputerizedmodelsthatareconstantlybeingupdatedandevolvedalongsidephysical

equivalents

isreallythe

essence

ofdigitaltwins,”saidMichaelKapteyn,a

leading

researcherstudying

digital

twincomputermodels.Intheforeseeablefuture,digitaltwinsmay

eventually

becomean

essential

partofoureverydaylivesby

enabling

individuals

withoutprevioustechnicalknowledgetofinallygetsimpleanswersto

complex

questions.12.Inwhatwaydodigitaltwinsbenefitpeople?A.Theycreateacolorfulvirtualworld.B.Theyprovideawaytobetterpeople’slives.C.TheyimprovethedatathroughIoTdevicesinstantly.D.TheypromotethecopiesofInternet-connectedobjects.13.WhydoestheauthormentiontheQueensferryCrossinginparagraph2?A.Toclarifyadetail.B.Tomakeacomparison.C.Toexplainarule.D.Topresentanapplication.14.Whatcanweexpectofthedigitaltwintechnology?A.Itwillpopularizetheapplicationofsensors.B.Itmayreplacethetraditionalproductionline.C.Itmightofferpatientspersonalizedtreatments.D.Itcouldmanagetoavoidallhealthproblems.15.WhatisvitalfordigitaltwinsaccordingtoMichaelKapteyn?A.Updatingphysicalequivalentsconstantly.B.Addingmoresetsofcomputerizedmodels.C.Enablingpeopletofigureouttoughquestions.D.Keepingadigitaldoublerenewedcontinually.BDCDIfyoufacetwosimilarvaluedoptionsforwheretoattendcollege,you

haveweighedtheprosandcons,butyoustillhavedifficulty

deciding.Youdecidetogiveitmoretime,andthinkaboutitabitmore.Thefindingsofafascinatingpaper

titled

IrrationalTimeAllocationinDecision-Making

suggestsyoumightbemakingamistake.

Participants

intheresearchviewedimagesthatcontainedpairsofdifferentfoodsandtheyhadtochoosewhichitemtheypreferredtoeat.Theresearchersfoundthatparticipantsspentmoretime

choosing

betweenoptionsthatwereroughlyequalinvaluethanbetweenoptionsinwhichtherewasalargevalue

disparity.Inotherwords,peopletooklongerthantheyshouldhavewhendecidingbetweentwoequally

appealing

choices.Whenshownanunpleasantfoodalongsideafavoredfood,participantschosequickly.Whenshownafavoredfoodalongsideanotherfavoredfood,peopletookawhile.Relatedly,thereisresearchsuggestingthatpeopletakelonger

todistinguish

betweentwonumberswhenthereisasmalldifferencethanwhenthereisalargeone.Forexample,peopletakelongertodeterminewhichnumberislargerbetween47vs49thanfor12vs35.Perhapsthistendencyexplainswhypeopletakesolongtochoosebetweentwooptionswithroughlyequal

payoffs.Inthesamewaythatwehavedifficulty

distinguishing

numbersthatarenearlyequalinvalue,wealsohavedifficulty

choosing

betweenoptionsthatareroughlyequallypleasant.However,therearedoubtsamongpeople.Somethinkthisseemsnotreasonable.Iftwochoicesareequallyappealing,thenthedecisionshouldn’ttakesolong.Somewonderwhetherthisworksintheoppositedirection—whether

duration

ofdecision-making

implies

thatoptionsareequal.Whenoptionsareroughlyequal,peopletendtotakealongtimetodecide.Doesthissuggest

thatif

peopletakealongtimetodecide,then

options

are

roughly

equal?Maybeinsomeinstances,thelongerwetaketomakeadecision,thelessitmatterswhatweactuallychoose.8.What’speople’scommonpracticeindecisionmaking?A.Theyoftenrushadecisionwithoutmuchthinking.B.Theyseldombalanceadvantagesanddisadvantages.C.Theyonlyconcentrateontheirpersonalpreferences.D.Theytendtospendtoomuchtimeontheiroptions.9.Whatdoestheunderlinedword“disparity”inparagraph3probablymean?A.Difference.B.Preference.C.Growth.D.Potential.10.Whatdoestheresearchconveyinparagraph4?A.Itisdifficultforpeopletovaluetheiroptions.B.Thevalueofnumbersisdifficulttodistin

溫馨提示

  • 1. 本站所有資源如無特殊說明,都需要本地電腦安裝OFFICE2007和PDF閱讀器。圖紙軟件為CAD,CAXA,PROE,UG,SolidWorks等.壓縮文件請下載最新的WinRAR軟件解壓。
  • 2. 本站的文檔不包含任何第三方提供的附件圖紙等,如果需要附件,請聯(lián)系上傳者。文件的所有權(quán)益歸上傳用戶所有。
  • 3. 本站RAR壓縮包中若帶圖紙,網(wǎng)頁內(nèi)容里面會有圖紙預(yù)覽,若沒有圖紙預(yù)覽就沒有圖紙。
  • 4. 未經(jīng)權(quán)益所有人同意不得將文件中的內(nèi)容挪作商業(yè)或盈利用途。
  • 5. 人人文庫網(wǎng)僅提供信息存儲空間,僅對用戶上傳內(nèi)容的表現(xiàn)方式做保護(hù)處理,對用戶上傳分享的文檔內(nèi)容本身不做任何修改或編輯,并不能對任何下載內(nèi)容負(fù)責(zé)。
  • 6. 下載文件中如有侵權(quán)或不適當(dāng)內(nèi)容,請與我們聯(lián)系,我們立即糾正。
  • 7. 本站不保證下載資源的準(zhǔn)確性、安全性和完整性, 同時也不承擔(dān)用戶因使用這些下載資源對自己和他人造成任何形式的傷害或損失。

評論

0/150

提交評論