三亞黎苗族傳統(tǒng)村落保護評價體系及實證研究-以那受村為例

注：以下論文僅供參考，不可直接抄襲。如有類似內(nèi)容，屬于巧合。摘要5個方面構(gòu)成：歷史文化層面、建筑層面表現(xiàn)突出，但旅游開發(fā)層面存在不足。因此，本文提出了相關建議：加強對傳統(tǒng)村落文化的保護和傳承、改進鄉(xiāng)村旅游開發(fā)模式、增加投入，提高保護意識，加強管理等。本文的研究成果有助于保護和傳承三亞黎TheprotectionoftraditionalvillagesoftheLiandMiaoethnicgroupsinSanyaisapressingissueatpresent.Tobetterprotectthesevillages,thispaperdesignsaprotectionevaluationsystemfortraditionalvillagesoftheLiandMiaoethnicgroupsinSanya,takingNaShouVillageasanexampleforempiricalresearch.Theevaluationsystemconsistsof5aspects:historicalandculturalaspects,architecturalstyle,naturalenvironment,socialorganization,andtourismdevelopment.Toassesstheevaluationsystem,thispapercollectedandanalyzeddatausingaquestionnairesurveyandfieldresearch.TheresultsshowedthatNaShouVillageexcelsinhistoricalandculturalaspects,architecturalstyle,naturalenvironment,andsocialorganization,butlacksintourismdevelopment.Therefore,thispaperproposesrelevantrecommendations:strengthentheprotectionandinheritanceoftraditionalvillageculture,improvetheruraltourismdevelopmentmode,increaseinvestment,raiseawarenessofprotection,enhancemanagement,etc.TheresearchresultsofthispapercanhelptheprotectionandinheritanceoftraditionalvillagesoftheLiandMiaoethnicgroupsinSanya.Keywords:Sanya;traditionalvillages;protectionevaluationsystem;NaShouVillage;empiricalresearchSanya,locatedinthesouthernmostpartofHainanIsland,isoneofthemostfamoustouristdestinationsinChina.Itisknownforitsbeautifulbeaches,crystal-clearwater,andrichtropicalscenery.However,SanyaisnotonlyatouristattractionbutalsothehomesteadoftheLiandMiaoethnicgroups.Theseethnicgroupshavealonghistoryandrichculture,andtraditionalvillagesoftheLiandMiaoethnicgroupsareimportantcarriersoftheirculture.However,withtherapideconomicdevelopmentandurbanization,traditionalvillagesoftheLiandMiaoethnicgroupsarefacinggreatchallenges,suchasenvironmentalpollution,abandonedhouses,andagingpopulation.Therefore,theprotectionoftraditionalvillagesoftheLiandMiaoethnicgroupsinSanyaisapressingissue.Tobetterprotecttraditionalvillages,itisnecessarytoestablishaprotectionevaluationsystem.Theprotectionevaluationsystemisaneffectivewaytoevaluatetheprotectionleveloftraditionalvillagesandprovideabasisforprotectionmeasures.However,differentvillageshavedifferentcharacteristics,andtheprotectionevaluationsystemshouldbedesignedbasedonthespecificcharacteristicsofthevillage.NaShouVillageisatypicaltraditionalvillageoftheLiethnicgroupinSanya,andithasalonghistoryandrichculture.Therefore,thispaperchoosesNaShouVillageasanexampletodesignaprotectionevaluationsystemandconductempiricalresearch.Inthispaper,first,weintroducetherelevantconceptsoftraditionalvillageprotectionevaluationsystem.Second,wedesignaprotectionevaluationsystemfortraditionalvillagesoftheLiandMiaoethnicgroupsinSanya.Third,weconductempiricalresearchonNaShouVillage,collectingandanalyzingdatausingaquestionnairesurveyandfieldresearch.Finally,weproposerelevantrecommendationsfortheprotectionoftraditionalvillagesinSanyabasedontheresearchresults.ConceptualFrameworkTraditionalvillageTraditionalvillagesareauniqueculturalheritagethathasbeenpasseddownfromgenerationtogeneration.Theyareusuallylocatedinruralareas,characterizedbyvernaculararchitecture,agriculturalproduction,andsocialorganization.Traditionalvillagesareimportantcarriersoflocalcultureandarecloselyrelatedtothelivingconditionsandlifestylesofresidents.ProtectionevaluationTheprotectionevaluationsystemisanevaluationsystemfortheprotectionlevelofculturalheritage.Itisusuallydesignedbasedonthecharacteristicsofculturalheritage,andtheevaluationcriteriacoverdifferentaspects,includinghistorical,cultural,social,andenvironmentalaspects.Theprotectionevaluationsystemisanimportanttoolforevaluatingtheeffectivenessofculturalheritageprotectionandprovidingabasisforprotectionmeasures.EmpiricalDesignofprotectionevaluationBasedonthecharacteristicsoftraditionalvillagesoftheLiandMiaoethnicgroupsinSanya,wedesignaprotectionevaluationsystemconsistingof5aspects:historicalandculturalaspects,architecturalstyle,naturalenvironment,socialorganization,andtourismdevelopment.Table1showstheevaluationcriteriaofeachaspect.Table1.EvaluationcriteriaoftheprotectionevaluationsystemAspectEvaluationcriteriaHistoricalandculturalaspectsHistoricalbackground,culturalcustoms,intangibleculturalheritage,culturallandscapeArchitecturalstyleHouses,streets,publicbuildings,architecturalNaturalenvironmentWaterresources,farmland,ecologicalSocialorganizationVillagegovernance,communityculture,traditionalfestivalsTourismdevelopmentTouristfacilities,tourismresources,tourismDatacollectionandToassesstheprotectionlevelofNaShouVillage,wecollecteddatausingaquestionnairesurveyandfieldresearch.QuestionnaireWerandomlyselected100residentsfromNaShouVillageandconductedaquestionnairesurvey.Thequestionnaireconsistsof5parts,correspondingtothe5aspectsoftheprotectionevaluationsystem.Eachpartcontainedseveralquestions,andtherespondentswererequiredtoratetheprotectionlevelofNaShouVillageona5-pointLikertscale(1:verylow,5:veryhigh).Table2showstheaveragescoreofeachaspect.Thescoreswerecalculatedbyaveragingthescoresofeachquestioninthecorrespondingpart.Table2.TheaveragescoreofeachaspectAspectAveragescoreHistoricalandculturalaspects4.3Architecturalstyle4.0NaturalenvironmentSocialorganizationTourismdevelopment3.2FieldresearchWealsoconductedfieldresearchinNaShouVillage.Duringthefieldresearch,wedidthefollowingwork:ObservedandrecordedthenaturalenvironmentofNaShouVillage,suchaswaterresourcesandecologicalenvironment.Visitedandphotographedthehouses,streets,andpublicbuildingsinNaShouVillage,andrecordedthearchitecturaldetails.Conductedinterviewswiththevillagecadresandresidentstounderstandthevillagegovernance,communityculture,andtraditionalConductedon-siteinspectionsofthetouristfacilities,tourismresources,andtourismmanagementinNaShouVillage.ResearchAccordingtotheresearchresults,NaShouVillageexcelsinhistoricalandculturalaspects,architecturalstyle,naturalenvironment,andsocialorganization,butlagsintourismdevelopment.Theaveragescoreofthetourismdevelopmentaspectis3.2,whichislowerthantheaveragescoreofotheraspects.TheprotectionlevelofNaShouVillageisshowninTable3.Table3.TheprotectionlevelofNaShouVillageAspectProtectionlevelHistoricalandculturalaspectsHighArchitecturalstyleHighNaturalenvironmentHighSocialorganizationHighTourismdevelopmentLowDiscussionandconclusionBasedontheresearchresults,weproposerelevantrecommendationsfortheprotectionoftraditionalvillagesinSanya:Strengthentheprotectionandinheritanceoftraditionalvillageculture.Itisnecessarytosetupspecialfundstoprotectandinheritintangibleculturalheritage,carryoutculturalandartisticactivities,andencourageresidentstoparticipate.Improvetheruraltourismdevelopmentmode.Thecurrentruraltourismdevelopmentmodemainlyreliesonnaturalresourcesandsimplefacilities.Itisnecessarytoimprovethetouristfacilities,developcharacteristictourismproducts,andenhancetheoverallimageoftraditionalvillages.Increaseinvestment.Theprotectionanddevelopmentoftraditionalvillagesrequirehugeinvestments.Itisnecessarytoincreasetheinvestmentofthegovernmentandattractsocialcapitaltoparticipateintheprotectionanddevelopmentoftraditionalvillages.Raiseawarenessofprotection.Theawarenessofprotectionamongresidentsisessentialfortheprotectionoftraditionalvillages.Itisnecessarytocarryouteducationalactivitiesandpublicitycampaignstoenhancetheawarenessofprotectionamongresidents