新SAT真題分享:2017-03-U.S(學(xué)習(xí)資料)_第1頁(yè)
新SAT真題分享:2017-03-U.S(學(xué)習(xí)資料)_第2頁(yè)
新SAT真題分享:2017-03-U.S(學(xué)習(xí)資料)_第3頁(yè)
新SAT真題分享:2017-03-U.S(學(xué)習(xí)資料)_第4頁(yè)
新SAT真題分享:2017-03-U.S(學(xué)習(xí)資料)_第5頁(yè)
已閱讀5頁(yè),還剩83頁(yè)未讀, 繼續(xù)免費(fèi)閱讀

下載本文檔

版權(quán)說(shuō)明:本文檔由用戶提供并上傳,收益歸屬內(nèi)容提供方,若內(nèi)容存在侵權(quán),請(qǐng)進(jìn)行舉報(bào)或認(rèn)領(lǐng)

文檔簡(jiǎn)介

14·1回mThegraphofthelineartheLeadSamplesonaFarmL:aad7:?:)I1s:31I1:67III7hasay-interceptof12andaslopeof-3/4.isthex-interceptofthegraphoff??·Todeterminewhethertobuyaplotofland,a

ishavingthesoiltestedlead.Thetableabove

showstheamountoflead,partspermillion

(ppm),insixofthesevensamplesofsoilselectedat

random.Iftheaverage(arithmeticmean)amountleadthesamples,inppm,isnomore1200,thewillbuytheplotofland;otherwise,thewillnotit.Whatisthe

greatestpossibleamountoflead,ppm,thatcanbe

intheseventhsampleifthebuystheland?57仰掃碼進(jìn)入「TD真題捕手」獲取答案ESSAY2017-03U.S.timethetest.

It’soneofthebestgettheSthetest,itrightat.Asyoureadthepassagebelow,considerhowDavidKatzuses?evidence,suchasfactsorexamples,tosupportclaims.?reasoningtodevelopideasandtoconnectclaimsandevidence.?stylisticorpersuasiveelements,suchaswordchoiceorappealstoemotion,

toaddpowertotheideasexpressed.AdaptedfromDavidKatz,“OpinionStew.”1Everyonehasopinions.Youprobablyknowwhattheysayaboutthat.Butleavingaside

theolfactoryqualitiesofalltheopinionstowhichweareentitled,weatleasttendto

knowwhenouropinionsarejustopinions.Butnotwithnutrition*,wherenotonly

doeseveryonehaveanopinion,buteveryoneseemstothinktheirsisanexpert

opinion.Andourcultureseemstobeokaywiththat.I’mnot.2Bythesametoken,I’mnotconvincedthatsomeonewhohappenstolivethrougha

badcarcrashtodriveagainisautomaticallyqualifiedtotakeoverNHTSA,orsetup

shopasamotorvehiclesafetyexpert,anddispenseadviceaccordingly.Callmecrazy.3Iamnotatallsurethatsomeonewhoinadvertentlysetsfiretohiskitchen,and

managestoputoutthefirebeforeburningeverythingentirelydown,isashoe-inas

firecommissioner,orqualifiesasafiresafetyexpert.Iamnotsurethatheshould

goontoestablishacottageindustryinfiresafety,sellingexpertadviceinbooks,

blogs,andprograms.4Itrusttheseexamplesallseemprettysilly.Wewouldneverallowforclaimsof

expertise,andcottageindustriesbasedonthem,tobeestablishedonsuchflighty

nonsense.5Unless,ofcourse,theclaimsofexpertiseandcottageindustriespertainedtonutrition

andweightloss—inwhichcase,that’sexactlywhatwewoulddo.It’sexactlywhatwe

aredoing.6Everyonewhohasevergottenfatandthenlostweightisembracedasanexpert,fully

authorizedbyourculturetodispenseadviceandsellbooksadvisingothersonhowto

succeed.Forthemostpart,everyoneofthesemakesacasedifferentfromeveryother

—andyeteveryoneisconvincedtheyhavefoundtheuniversalformula.Andover

andoveragain,thefaithful,orhopeful,lineupandreachfortheircreditcards.7Thisisnotjustnonsense.It’sdangerousnonsense.8Iamnotarguingthatnutritionisspecialandshouldbetreateddifferentlysimply

becauseitisoneofthemostprofoundinfluencesonhumanhealth(itis).Iamnot

arguingthatnutritionshouldbetreatedwithparticularrespectbecauseitmakesthe

listoftopthreecausesofprematuredeathandchronicdisease,andcanexerta

positiveinfluencejustasgreat(itdoes).Iamnotsuggestingthatnutritionshouldbe

shownuniquedeferencebecauseitrepresentstheconstructionmaterialforthe

growingbodiesofchildrenandgrandchildrenwelove.9Quitethecontrary;Iamsayingweneedtostoptreatingnutritiondifferently.We

simplyneedtotreatitaswedoanyothersubjectthatmatters,andawholelotof

harmandconfusionwouldgoaway.Weneedtostoptreatingnutritionwithunique

disdain.10Whatharmensuesfromthatdisdain?Everysillydiettocomedownthepikegets

thesametreatment.Iknowthis,becauseIdomultiplemediainterviewseveryweek

aboutwhateverthefaddietdujourhappenstobe(thelatestthemeisintermittent

fasting,bytheway).Thesedietsarethenfeaturedontelevisionandinprintinaway

thatgivesthemallcomparablecredibility.Andweareallkeptinastateofperpetual

confusionaboutwhat’swhat.11Admittedly,therearedifferencesofopinionamongevenlegitimateexpertsin

nutrition.Tosomeextent,thisistheinevitableparsingofdetailsthatoccursamong

expertsinanyfield;it’sabouttheicing,notthecake.Tosomeextent,thisisa

byproductofourincompleteandevolvingknowledgeofnutritionandhealth.ButI

dobelieveitiscompoundedbyourtendencytotreatanyopiniononnutritionasan

expertopinion.Togetnoticedatallinsuchcontext,someotherwiselegitimate

expertswindupexaggeratingtheirperspectivestothepointofdisfigurement.Isee

thisastheveryunfortunateresultofcollusionamongaculturethatfailstorequire

trueexpertiseasabasisforexpertopinion;anewsmediathatprofitsfromthe

perpetualuncertaintyoftheiraudience,andthustheirreceptivitytothenextfalse

promise;andexpertswillingtodowhateverittakestobeheardabovethisdin.Alas.12Wehavecreatedaseethingstewofopinionabouteverythingtodowithnutrition,

including,presumably,stew.Thatleavesuswithfartoomanycooks,manylacking

credentialstobeinthekitcheninthefirstplace.Itrusteveryoneknowswhatthat

means.WriteanessayinwhichyouexplainhowDavidKatzbuildsanargumentto

persuadehisaudiencethatnutritionaladviceshouldcomefromlegitimate

experts.Inyouressay,analyzehowKatzusesoneormoreofthefeature

溫馨提示

  • 1. 本站所有資源如無(wú)特殊說(shuō)明,都需要本地電腦安裝OFFICE2007和PDF閱讀器。圖紙軟件為CAD,CAXA,PROE,UG,SolidWorks等.壓縮文件請(qǐng)下載最新的WinRAR軟件解壓。
  • 2. 本站的文檔不包含任何第三方提供的附件圖紙等,如果需要附件,請(qǐng)聯(lián)系上傳者。文件的所有權(quán)益歸上傳用戶所有。
  • 3. 本站RAR壓縮包中若帶圖紙,網(wǎng)頁(yè)內(nèi)容里面會(huì)有圖紙預(yù)覽,若沒(méi)有圖紙預(yù)覽就沒(méi)有圖紙。
  • 4. 未經(jīng)權(quán)益所有人同意不得將文件中的內(nèi)容挪作商業(yè)或盈利用途。
  • 5. 人人文庫(kù)網(wǎng)僅提供信息存儲(chǔ)空間,僅對(duì)用戶上傳內(nèi)容的表現(xiàn)方式做保護(hù)處理,對(duì)用戶上傳分享的文檔內(nèi)容本身不做任何修改或編輯,并不能對(duì)任何下載內(nèi)容負(fù)責(zé)。
  • 6. 下載文件中如有侵權(quán)或不適當(dāng)內(nèi)容,請(qǐng)與我們聯(lián)系,我們立即糾正。
  • 7. 本站不保證下載資源的準(zhǔn)確性、安全性和完整性, 同時(shí)也不承擔(dān)用戶因使用這些下載資源對(duì)自己和他人造成任何形式的傷害或損失。

最新文檔

評(píng)論

0/150

提交評(píng)論