![國有企業(yè)私人部門儲蓄率的形成與演變_第1頁](http://file4.renrendoc.com/view/3a6b5bf2d4b2e9218298209f668b4b82/3a6b5bf2d4b2e9218298209f668b4b821.gif)
![國有企業(yè)私人部門儲蓄率的形成與演變_第2頁](http://file4.renrendoc.com/view/3a6b5bf2d4b2e9218298209f668b4b82/3a6b5bf2d4b2e9218298209f668b4b822.gif)
![國有企業(yè)私人部門儲蓄率的形成與演變_第3頁](http://file4.renrendoc.com/view/3a6b5bf2d4b2e9218298209f668b4b82/3a6b5bf2d4b2e9218298209f668b4b823.gif)
![國有企業(yè)私人部門儲蓄率的形成與演變_第4頁](http://file4.renrendoc.com/view/3a6b5bf2d4b2e9218298209f668b4b82/3a6b5bf2d4b2e9218298209f668b4b824.gif)
![國有企業(yè)私人部門儲蓄率的形成與演變_第5頁](http://file4.renrendoc.com/view/3a6b5bf2d4b2e9218298209f668b4b82/3a6b5bf2d4b2e9218298209f668b4b825.gif)
版權(quán)說明:本文檔由用戶提供并上傳,收益歸屬內(nèi)容提供方,若內(nèi)容存在侵權(quán),請進行舉報或認領(lǐng)
文檔簡介
國有企業(yè)私人部門儲蓄率的形成與演變
體現(xiàn)了三四三大通過非價值...環(huán)保思想,包括三和三物三因素高稅收在中國的情況是顯而易見的。2008年,國際范院長委員會提出了一項法案,以增加中國的高稅收。AmpleliteraturehasnotedthatChinahashighersavingsratesthanmanyothercountriesAccordingtoastudybythePeople’sBankofChina,1thenationalsavingsrateinChinaduring1978-1997averagedmorethan10percentagepointshigherthanthoseofthedevelopedcountries.InWuJian’sresearch,theaveragenationalsavingsratewasestimatedat37.1percentduring1978-1997,stabilizingataround40percentafter1993.2KraaypointedouthattheaveragenationalsavingsrateinChinafrom1978to1995was37percent,comparedto21percentinothercountriesinthesameperiod.3KuijsalsonotedthatChina’ssavingsratein2003washigherthanthoseintheUS,France,JapanandSouthKoreain2002by28.2percent,21.8percent,17percentand11.5percentrespectively.4However,itshouldbenotedthatthedifferentstatisticalmethodsusedinChinaandothercountriesmayhaveexaggeratedthedifferencesintheirsavingsrates.RenRuoenandQinXiaosuggestedthat30percenofthesavingsrategapbetweenChinaandtheUSwascausedbydifferencesinstatisticamethodsforsavingsandincome.5Afteradjustingforstatisticalmethods,China’ssavingsrateaveraged22.69percentbetween1992and2001,farlessthanthe40percentestimatedbyotherstudies.Evenso,thegapbetweenthetwocountries’savingsrateswas15.87percent.Muchacademicliteraturehastriedtoexplorereasonsfordifferentsavingsrates.Theseinclude,amongothers,economicgrowth,economicdevelopmentstage,economiccycleincomedistribution,demographicstructureandinstitutionalset-upaswellasaprecautionarysavingsincentiveduetouncertainties.ThefirsttypeofexplanationisbasedontraditionaKeynesiantheory.Itholdsthatthesavingsratedependsondisposableincomeandmarginasavingspropensity.Thatis,S/Y=s0/Y+s,inwhichSstandsforsavings,smeansmarginasavingspropensityandYisincome.Lifecycletheorystatesthatgivenrelativelystablegrowthofdisposableincome,thesavingsratedependsonthegrowthrateofincome.Thatis,s/y=s0+sg+e,inwhichs0iscloseto0,s>0,gisthegrowthrateofincomeandetherandomerror.ModiglianiandCaofoundapositiverelationshipbetweenhouseholdsavingsrateandeconomicgrowthrate,dependencyratioandinflationusingdatafrom1953to2000.6ChenLipingintroducedarationalconsumptioncomparison,andfoundthatthemarginalutilityofcurrentconsumptionandfutureconsumptioncanincreasesimultaneously,andhighsavingscangeneratehighgrowthratesandviceversa.7WangDihaiandGongLiutangshowedthatChina’shighsavingsratesweremainlycausedbyhigheconomicgrowth,highcapitaloutputelasticity,ahighsubjectivediscountrateandmyopicexpectations.8Thesecondtypeofexplanationisbasedondemographicfactors.Thatis,thedemographicdividendresultingfromthefastergrowthrateoftheworkingpopulationasaproportionofthetotalcanleadtoincomeincreases,andtherebytohighersavingsrates.9InChina,theweakpensionsystemhaspushedupmarginalpropensitytosaveandreducedmarginalpropensitytoconsume,whichinturnraisedsavingsrates.10HoriokaandWanidentifiedahighcorrelationbetweenChina’shighsavingsrateanditsagestructure(childdependencyratioinparticular),realinterestratesandpastsavingsrates,usingprovincialdatafrom1995to2004.11WeiShangjinandZhangXiaobofoundthatthemovementsofChina’ssavingsratesweresimilartothoseofsexratiowitha20yeartimelag,during1975-2005.12Theirempiricalresultsobtainedfromprovinciadatashowedthatthesexratiowaspowerfulinexplainingthesavingsrates,withahigherregressioncoefficientfortheruralareasthanfortheurbanareas.Thethirdtypeoftheoryisbasedontheassumptionthatpeoplehaveaprecautionarysavingsincentiveintheprocessofinstitutionalchanges.Moststudiesconsiderthatasocialsecuritysafetynet,pensionshealthinsuranceandunemploymentinsurancecanreducetheuncertaintiesinfutureincomeandexpenditures,andtherebyreducesavingsrates.SongZhengarguesthatsignificanuncertaintiesinresidents’incomehaveraisedChina’ssavingsrate.13Anumberofempiricastudieshavealsofoundthatpensionreformandpensionwealthhavehadnotableimpactsonhouseholdsavingsrates.14ThispaperstudiestherisingsavingsrateinChinasince2000fromthepointofviewofpublicfinance.TheauthorsseparateoutSOEsfromenterprisesasawholeandcombinethemwiththegovernmentsectortoformthe“publicsector”;thissector’ssavingsratewecallthe“publicsectorsavingsrate.”Non-SOEsandprivateindividualsarecombinedintothe“privatesector”;itssavingsrateiscalledthe“privatesectorsavingsrate.”InconjunctionwiththecharacteristicsofChina’seconomictransitionperiod,thepaperputsforwardapublicfinancehypothesistoanalyzethecausesofthehighsavingsrateinChina.ThroughanalyzingthetransmissionmechanismoftheperformanceofSOEs,publicexpenditures,publicsectorsavingsandprivatesectorsavings,thepaperidentifiedthestrongimpactofgovernmenbehavioronsavingsrates(sectionIII).Thishypothesisisthentestedbyusing30-provincepaneldatafrom1992to2006insectionIV.u設(shè)備和規(guī)范使用perceningsoquesOnthebasisofdifferentsectors,thenationalsavingsratecanbeclassifiedasthesavingsratesofthegovernment,enterpriseandresidentsectorsorasthepublicsavingsrateandtheprivatesavingsrate.Duetodataconstraints,earlystudiesnormallydefinedgovernmensavingsrateastheratioofgovernmentsavingstoGDP,wherethegovernmentsavingsarethedifferencebetweenitsrecurrentincomeandrecurrentexpenditures.Thecalculationissubjectounderestimationofthegovernmentsavingsratebecauserecurrentincomedoesn’tincludeoff-budgetincomeandrecurrentexpendituresusuallyincludeinvestmentexpenditures.HeXinhuaandCaoYongfu,Kuijs,andLiYangandYinJianfengusedfundsflowstatementstoestimatethesavingsratesofdifferentsectors.15Inafundsflowstatement,thegovernmenincomeincludesbudgetaryandoff-budgetincome,andgovernmentconsumptionis“consumptionexpendituresofpublicservicesandthenetexpendituresofgoodsandservicesprovidedtohouseholdsfreeoratrelativelylowpricesbythegovernment.Theformerequalsthegapbetweenoutputvalueofpublicservicesandincomeofgovernmentagencies,andthelatterequalsthemarketvalueminusactualcollectedpricesofgoodsandservicesprovidedbythegovernmenttohouseholdsfreeoratrelativelylowprices.”16Thetwomainpurposesofgovernmentsavingsarecapitaltransferandinvestment.Figure1showsnationalsavingsratesfrom1992to2007,andthesavingsratesofresidentsgovernmentandenterprises.Thefollowingfeaturesarenoteworthy.First,national,residententerpriseandgovernmentsavingsratesaveraged42.48percent,19.69percent,16.13percenand6.66percentrespectively,withstandarderrorsof3.79percent,1.8percent,2.42percenand1.64percentrespectively.Althoughresidents’savingsaccountedforaroundhalfofnationalsavings,theirstandarderrorislowerthanthoseofnationalandenterprisessavingsDuring1992-2000,residents’savingsratefellfrom21.08percentto16.5percent,whilethenationalsavingsrateremainedaround40percent.After2000,theresidents’savingsratereturnedto21.82percentin2007;whileduringthatperiod,thenationalsavingsratejumpedfrom38.5percentto50.88percent.Moreover,priorto2000,thesavingsratesofgovernmenandenterpriseshadbeenstableataround5.5percentand14.8percentrespectively;from2000to2007,thegovernmentsavingsrateincreasedfrom6.4percentto10.6percent,andtheenterprisesavingsratefrom15.6percentto18.4percent.Thismeansthatchangesintheresidents’savingsratecannotexplainthechangesinthenationalsavingsrate.Kuijsarguedthatincreasedprofitabilitycapacityhadboostedtheenterprisesavingsrate,17whilecapitaltransferbythegovernmenttosupportSOEshadheightenedthesavingsrateofthegovernmentsector.LiYangandYinJianfengregardthegovernmentsectorasthemaindriveroftheincreasingsavingsrateafter2000.18TheydisagreewithKuijsinthattheyattributetherisingsavingsrateoftheenterprisesectortolowwageandinterestcostsratherthanprofitabilitycapacity,andtherisinggovernmentsavingsratetogovernmentinvestmentinSOEsinsteadofcapitaltransfer.Thesestudiesfailtoexploretherelationshipbetweentheenterpriseandthegovernmentsectors,aswellastheuniqueroleofSOEsinthechangesinthesavingsrate.Aftertaxreformsin1983,1984and1994,thefinancialindependenceoftheSOEswassignificantlyenhanced.However,thesegregationofgovernmentfrommanagementofstateownedassetsonlyregulatedtheprofit-sharingrelationshipbetweengovernmentandSOEsanddidnotchangetherelationshipofSOEsandthepublicsector.SOEshavesuppliedalargenumberoftaxrevenue.Duringtheperiodof2003-2007,SOEscontributed5.97trillionyuanintaxes;in2007alone,SOEtaxesreached1.57trillionyuan,or30percentoffiscalincomefortheyear.Thispaperdividesthenationalsavingsrateintothesavingsrateofthepublicsectorandthatoftheprivatesector.Incomputingpublicsectorandprivatesectorsavings,thepaperadjustsSOEprofitsduringtheperiod1992-2007.Thatis,thedisposableincomeofthepublicsectorequalsgovernmentdisposableincomeplusSOEprofits,whilethatoftheprivatesectorequalsenterprisedisposableincomeplusresidents’disposableincomeandminusSOEprofitAsenterpriseshavenofinalconsumption,thereisnoneedforadjustmenthere.Thatis,theconsumptionofthepublicandtheprivatesectorequalstheconsumptionofthegovernmenandresidents.Thecalculationofthesavingsrateissimilar(Figure2).Besidesthis,totalfisca(public)expendituresincludeexpendituresbycentralandlocalgovernmentsoncultureandeducation,science,health,socialsecurityandadministration,andtotalfiscalrevenueincludesfiscalrevenueandoff-budgetrevenue.IntheresearchbyKuijsandLiYangandYinJianfeng,nationalsavingsratesaredividedintoresident,governmentandenterprisesavingsrates,ignoringtheco-movementofgovernmentandSOEsavingsandleadingtotheconclusionthatthenationalsavingsratewasdrivenbyincreasesinthegovernmentandenterprisesavingsrates(Figure3).Accordingtothedisaggregationofthenationalsavingsrateinthispaper,thechangesinthenationasavingsrateslightlylagthoseinthepublicsectorsavingsrate,buthavethesametrendMeanwhile,theprivatesectorsavingsratehasbeenmostlystable;itschangeslagthoseofthepublicsectorsavingsrate,butinadifferentdirection.3.公共生活1.國際醫(yī)學(xué)單一品是while-ve顯著聯(lián)合while國際專家證據(jù),while.國際聯(lián)邦公利里亞,while.國際聯(lián)邦公利里,v.c.v..........................................................3.3.3Thereisnocleardefinitionforthegovernmentprofit-seekingincentive,andwenormallyuse“governmentpreference.”DingJuhongandDengKebindefinegovernmentpreferenceasthesupplypreferenceofthegovernment,meaningthescaleandstructureofgovernmentsupply,whichincludespublicgoodsandservicesprovidedbythegovernment.19Likegovernmentpreference,thegovernmentprofit-seekingincentivemeansthatthegovernmentmakeseconomicdecisionsaccordingtowhetheritwillbenefitfromsuchdecisions.Sucheconomicdecisionsincludesupplyofpublicgoodsandservices,aswellaschoiceofinvestmentandconsumptionstructure.Sincethetaxsystemreformin1994,theaverageannualgrowthrateofbudgetincomehasbeen19.3percent,1.39timesthenominalGDPgrowthrate,whiletheaverageannualgrowthrateofexpendituresoncultureandeducationandonscienceandhealthhasbeen15.8percent.Duringthesameperiod,theannualaveragegrowthrateofgovernmentinvestmenthasbeen18.7percent,whilethatofgovernmentconsumption15.16percent.Asgovernmentinvestmentcomesfromgovernmentsavings,20thehighergovernmentinvestmentgrowthratehaspusheduppublicsavingsrates.Intheabove-mentionedstudies,Kuijsconsiderscapitaltransferthemaindriverforgovernmentsavings,whileLiYangandYinJianfengregardgovernmentinvestmentasamoreimportantfactor.WeagreewithLiandYinthatgovernmentinvestmentismoreimportantthanfundstransferinpushingupthepublicsectorsavingsrate.IftheprofitabilityofSOEsdeclines,theshareofgovernmentdirectinvestmentwilldrop,whichwillleadtoadecliningmarginalpropensitytosaveandadecliningsavingsrate.Ontheotherhand,withincreasedprofitabilityofSOEs,thegovernmentismorelikelytoinvestinSOEsforprofit,whichwillcausesimultaneousincreasesinthemarginalpropensitytosaveandthesavingsratesofthepublicsectorandgovernment.Figures2and4showthatastheROAofSOEsreducedfrom3.8percentto0.14percentduringtheperiodof1994-1998,themarginalpropensitytosaveofthepublicsectorreducedfrom29.86percentto19.4percent,andthesavingsrateofthepublicsectordeclinedfrom7.9percentto5.5percent.Duringtheperiodof1998-2007,theprofitabilityofSOEsincreasedsubstantiallywithROAskyrocketingfrom0.14percentto4.9percent.Thishasbroughtthemarginalpropensitytosaveofthepublicsectorupfrom19.4percentto56.4percent,andthesectorsavingsratefrom3.5percentto17.4percent.ThisshowsahighcorrelationbetweenpublicsectorsavingsrateandSOEprofitability.2.ubrcsoin-soe,etizact,etizacting,etizacts,etThepublicfinancefunctionmeansthegovernmentroleinprovidingpublicgoodsandservicesthroughpublicexpenditures.Publicgoodsandservicesfeaturenon-exclusivenessandnon-competitiveness,andcaninducefree-ridingandreverseselectionifprovidedbytheprivatesectoronly.Typicalpublicgoodsandservicesincludecultureandeducationscienceandhealth,socialsecurity,nationaldefense,etc.Ifthegovernmentplaysitsroleandmaximizesthewelfareofsociety,thenitshouldprovidesufficientpublicgoodsandservicesotherwise,theremaybeshortagesinpublicgoodsandservicesifthegovernmentisaffectedbytheprofit-seekingincentiveineconomicdecision-making.Ascomparedtotheprovisionofcultureandeducation,scienceandhealth,andsocialsecurity,investmentininfrastructuresuchasrailways,highways,commercialcentersandindustrybasesmaycarrymoreexternalitiesSuchinvestmentwillhelpattractforeigncapitalintheshortterm,promoteeconomicgrowthandenhancegovernmentperformance.21Besides,thoseimplementinglargeprojectsarenormallySOEs,whichcontributeatremendousamountoftaxeswhileaddingvaluetotheirownassets.Underbudgetconstraints,thegovernmentismoreinclinedtoinvestinSOEs,anditssearchforprofitabilityislikelytocrowdouttheexecutionofitspublicfinancefunctions.Figure5showsthatchangesintheratioofpublicexpenditurestototalfiscalexpenditureslagchangesinSOEprofitability,andareinadifferentdirection.Duringtheperiodof1993-1998,SOEprofitabilityandpublicsectorsavingsratereduced,whileexpendituresoncultureandeducationscienceandhealth,andsocialsecurityincreased.However,suchexpendituresstabilizedaround2000,beforeadrasticdeclineafter2002.ThiscameaftertherapidincreaseinSOEprofits.After2000,SOEprofitincreasedbyahuge34percentperyear,andtheROAofSOEsincreasedfrom1.5percentto4.6percent.From2002to2006,theratioofpublicexpenditurestototalfiscarevenuefellfrom41percentto38.6percent.Thisshowsthatwhenthegovernmentpursuedprofit,itspublicfinancefunctions,especiallyexpendituresoncultureandeducation,scienceandhealth,andsocialsecuritywereweakened,whichaffectedprivatesectorsavingsrate.3.u3000resessoffirsityuffiecesindsp.4.3.4和......3.4.4和....4方法.u3000..............................3.4和......和.....4.3.4和....和.5.5Theprecautionarysavingshypothesisholdsthat,givenuncertaintiesinexpectationsoffutureincomeandexpenditures,householdswillsmoothcurrentandfutureconsumptionthroughsavings.Asstrongeducation,publichealthandsocialsecuritysystemscanhelptoreducefutureuncertainties,theycantherebyreducethecurrentsavingsoftheprivatesector.InChina,reformsinSOEs,education,health,housing,andsocialsecurityhavebeenimplementedsuccessivelysincethelate1990s.Thesehavestrengthenedtherelationshipbetweenprivatesectorsavingsbehavioranduncertainty.Manyempiricalstudieshavefoundthatincomeuncertaintyisoneofthemaincausesforresidents’savingsinChina.22Infact,futureexpenditureuncertaintiesarealsoveryimportantfortheirsavingsbehavior.LiYonghuiandWenJiaoxiunotethatresidentshavetomakeprecautionarysavingsasaresultofdifferentiatedschoolingfeesanduncertaintiesaboutfutureeducationexpenditures,aswellasweaknessesinthehealthcareandsocialsecuritysystems.23YangRudaiandChenBinkaifoundthatexpendituresonhighereducationsignificantlycrowdedoutresidents’consumption.24Thereformofhighereducationin1999notonlysignificantlyincreasedfamilies’needforeducationexpenditures,butalsoaffectedrelatedexpectationsforfuturehighereducation,andtherefore,enhancedresidents’incentiveforprecautionarysavings.HeLixinetal.alsofoundthatpensionshadstrongsubstitutioneffectsonhouseholdsavings.25Figure6showsthestandardizedprivatesectorsavingsrate,marginalpropensitytosaveoftheprivatesectorandratioofpublicsectorexpenditurestototalfiscalrevenue.Priorto1999therelationshipbetweenthethreevariableswasunstablebecauseofaseriesofeconomicreforms.After1999,thefirsttwovariableshavemovedinadirectiondifferentfrompublicexpenditures,withaslighttimelag.Whenthedemographicstructureandconsumptionpatternsstabilize,theinsufficientinvestmentinculture,education,scienceandpublichealthwillforceresidentstoincreasesavingstomeetexpendituresintheseareas.Whenthegovernmentincreasesinvestmentinculture,education,scienceandpublichealth,residentscanreduceinputsintheseareas.Inaddition,thechangesinsocialsecurityhavesimilarimpactsonnon-SOEs.Ifthegovernmentreducessocialsafetyexpenditures,socialsecurityfunctionswillbetransferredtonon-SOEs,forcingthemtoincreasesavings.4.抗混合性能增強soes和satchsTheaboveanalysisbringsustothepublicfinancehypothesis:therisingsavingsrateinChinaispromptedbythegovernment’sprofit-seekingbehaviorandtheconsequentcrowdingoutimpactofsuchbehavioronthepublicfinancefunction.Thatis,withtheimprovingprofitabilityofSOEsandstate-ownedcommercialbanksafter2000,thegovernmenthasinvestedmoreintheseentities,andreducedfiscalexpendituresoncultureandeducationhealthcareandsocialsecurity.Insufficientfiscalexpenditurehastwoimpacts:(i)highersavingsratesforgovernmentandSOEs,i.e.,ahigherpublicsectorsavingsrate;(ii)moreprecautionarysavingsbyresidentsandnon-publicenterprises,i.e.,ahigherprivatesectorsavingsrate.ThecombinedimpactsofthetwohavesustainedChina’srisingsavings.Thehypothesisisbuiltonthreeassumptions:Assumption1.Thegovernmentisself-interestedintheshort-term;Assumption2.Governmentbehaviorissubjecttobudgetconstraints;andAssumption3.Theprivatesectorhasincentivesforprecautionarysavings.Here,thegovernmentreferstothecentralgovernment,centralgovernmentagencies(mainlyfiscalauthorities)andlocalgovernments.Althoughthecentralgovernmentactsinthepublicinterest,thelocalgovernmentsandgovernmentagenciesarelikelytobeselfinterestedintheshort-term.Theself-interestedcharacterofthegovernmentmeansthawhenthegovernmentmakesdecisions,ittargetsmaximizingitsownwelfare,notthewelfareofsociety.Overthelongrun,thepublicinterestofthecentralgovernmentcanplayanimportantrole;however,theself-interestoflocalgovernmentsandcentralgovernmentagenciescanbesignificantintheshortrun.Infact,thisself-interestedcharacterhasdistortedsomecriticaldecisions,especiallywhenthegovernment’sself-interestisalignedwithitsperformance.InChina,suchshort-runself-interestcanbetheresultofgovernmenperformanceevaluation,fiscalpower-sharingbythecentralandlocalgovernmentspromotionofofficials,changesofleadershipanddifficultiesinmonitoringgovernmenexpenditures.Moreover,theself-interestednatureofthegovernmentisalsosubjecttobudgetconstraints.Basedontheabove-mentionedthreeassumptions,wehavethefollowingtwopropositions:Proposition1.WhentheperformanceofSOEsincreases,theshort-runprofit-seekingincentiveofthegovernmentwillraisethepublicsectorsavingsrate.Proposition2.Theprofit-seekingincentiveofthegovernmentcancrowdouttheexecutionofitspublicfinancefunction,whichwillraisetheprivatesectorsavingsrate.Proposition1impliesastrongcorrelationbetweenthepublicsectorsavingsrateandSOEperformance.Thatis,withbetterSOEperformance,thegovernmentismorelikelytoinvestinSOEstogainperformanceandbenefits.Proposition2statesthatunder(soft)budgetconstraintsthegovernment’sdirectinvestmentinSOEswillcrowdoutpublicexpenditures,whichwillpushuptheprivatesector’sprecautionarysavingsandtherebytheprivatesectorsavingsrate.國際社會主導(dǎo)地位的soe-satchings,vectorsaratio,清理劑,清理流程,規(guī)范點,即價...........................................................3.3.3Thispaperteststhepublicfinancehypothesisusingpaneldatafor30provincesfortheperiodof1997-2006.Thetestingfocusesontheimpactofpublicexpendituresonthesavingsratesofdifferentsectors.Themodelsareasfollows:Ofthese,PUBSRmeanspublicsectorsavingsrate,PUBEXPmeanstheratioofpublicexpenditurestoGDP,PRISRmeansprivatesectorsavingsrate,andSOEPERFmeanstheratioofSOEprofitstoGDP.X,YandZarethecontrollingvariablesinthethreemodelsMoreover,μit,εit,andφitareresiduals,andα1,β1,andγ1areconstantvectors,α2,β2,andγ2areparametervectorsforthekeyvariables,θ,λandφaretherespectiveparametervectorsforthecontrollingvariables.AccordingtoAssumption2,themaincauseofthechangesinthepublicsectorsavingsrateisthegovernmentprofit-seekingmotive.ThegovernmentwillincreasedirectinvestmentinSOEsastheirperformanceimproves.Thiswillinturnraisethepublicsectorsavingsrateandcrowdoutpublicexpenditures,makingthemarginalpropensitytosaveincrease.Thismeansthatα2shouldbepositiveandsignificant,whileβ2shouldbenegativeandsignificant.Atthesametime,publicexpendituresaffecttheprivatesectorsavingsrate.Giventheincomeanddemographicstructure,asthegovernmentreducespublicexpenditures,theprivatesectorsavingsratewillincrease.Thismeansthatγ2shouldbenegativeandsignificant.1.fitseriececinpenssiciding(1)Savingsrate.26Duetolackofprovincial-levelflowoffundsstatements,thenationasavingsrateiscalculatedastheratioofGDPminusfinalconsumptiontoGDP.Foreachprovince,thepublicsectorsavingsrateistheratiotoprovincialGDPoffiscalrevenueplusoff-budgetincomeplusSOEprofitsminusgovernmentconsumption.Theprivatesectorsavingsrateisthegapbetweenthenationalsavingsrateandthepublicsectorsavingsrate.Ofthese,localgovernmentincomeincludesbudgetaryincome,centralgovernmensubsidies,provincialsubsidies,residualofthepreviousyear’sincomefromturningtreasurybondsintoloans,andresidualfromlocalincomeofthepreviousyear.ThedataforGDPandgovernmentconsumptionarefromvariousyearsofStatisticalYearbook,whilethedataforfiscalrevenue,off-budgetrevenueandSOEprofitsarefromtheFiscalStatisticsYearbookinvariousyears.(2)RatioofpublicexpenditurestoGDP,andSOEperformance.Publicexpendituresincludeexpendituresonpublicinfrastructure,education,socialsecurity,health,scienceandculture,administration,andthelike.Thispaperfocusesontheimpactofpublicexpendituresonprivatesavings;asthepublicexpendituresoninfrastructurearemostlythedirectinvestmentinSOEs,thepublicexpenditureinthispaperisthereforedefinedasexpenditureonculture,education,scienceandhealth,socialsecurityandadministration.TheratioofpublicexpenditurestoGDPcorrespondstotheexecutionofpublicfunctions.WhentheratioofpublicexpenditurestoGDPdeclines,thefiscalfunctionistransferredtotheprivatesectorAsaresult,theprivatesectorhastoincreasesavingstocoverexpendituresoneducationandhealth.Notethatdataoncultureandeducation,scienceandhealth,socialsecurityandadministrationarefromtheFiscalStatisticsYearbook.SOEperformanceisdenotedbytheROAofSOEs,alsofromtheFiscalStatisticsYearbook.(3)Othercontrolvariables.Theabsoluteincomehypothesisstatesthatthesavingsrateshouldbetheratioofsavingstoincomeinthecurrentperiod.Thelife-cyclehypothesisholdsthatafamilyarrangesitsconsumptionandsavingsaccordingtoitsexpectedlifetimeincomeinordertomaximizelifetimeutility.Alifetimecanbedividedintoyouth,middleageandoldage.Duringtheperiodsofyouthandoldage,consumptionisgreaterthanincome;whileintheperiodofmiddleage,consumptionislessthanincome.Asaresult,iftheproportionoftheyoungandtheoldincreases,thesavingsratewillreduce.ModiglianiandCaoalsofoundthathesavingsrateinChinaisaresultofeconomicgrowthanddemographicfactors.27Inmodel(1),GDPpercapitaanditsgrowthratearecontrollingvariables.Consideringthedifferencesinabsoluteprovincialpublicexpenditures,themodelintroducespublicexpenditurespercapitaasacontrolvariable.Inmodel(2),demographicvariablessuchasYoungandOldareintroduced.Youngdenotestheproportionofthepopulationyoungerthan14years,andOldreferstotheproportionofpopulationolderthan65years.Aswell,thepaperdiscussestheimpactofinterestrates,inflation,andsexratioonsavingsrates.Inaddition,dummyvariablesforregionsareintroducedtodefineregionaldifferenceinChina.AlldatacomefromtheStatisticsYearbookandFiscalStatisticalYearbook.2.通過非負事件直接反應(yīng)表...............................................................Thispaperappliesthefixedeffectsmodel,randomeffectsmodelandseeminglyunrelatedregression(SUR)totestthehypothesis.First,Models1and2applyfixedandrandomeffectsmodelsrespectivelyforsimulation,andthe
溫馨提示
- 1. 本站所有資源如無特殊說明,都需要本地電腦安裝OFFICE2007和PDF閱讀器。圖紙軟件為CAD,CAXA,PROE,UG,SolidWorks等.壓縮文件請下載最新的WinRAR軟件解壓。
- 2. 本站的文檔不包含任何第三方提供的附件圖紙等,如果需要附件,請聯(lián)系上傳者。文件的所有權(quán)益歸上傳用戶所有。
- 3. 本站RAR壓縮包中若帶圖紙,網(wǎng)頁內(nèi)容里面會有圖紙預(yù)覽,若沒有圖紙預(yù)覽就沒有圖紙。
- 4. 未經(jīng)權(quán)益所有人同意不得將文件中的內(nèi)容挪作商業(yè)或盈利用途。
- 5. 人人文庫網(wǎng)僅提供信息存儲空間,僅對用戶上傳內(nèi)容的表現(xiàn)方式做保護處理,對用戶上傳分享的文檔內(nèi)容本身不做任何修改或編輯,并不能對任何下載內(nèi)容負責(zé)。
- 6. 下載文件中如有侵權(quán)或不適當內(nèi)容,請與我們聯(lián)系,我們立即糾正。
- 7. 本站不保證下載資源的準確性、安全性和完整性, 同時也不承擔(dān)用戶因使用這些下載資源對自己和他人造成任何形式的傷害或損失。
最新文檔
- 2025年分離純化控制系統(tǒng)合作協(xié)議書
- 人教版 八年級英語下冊 Unit 10 單元綜合測試卷(2025年春)
- 人教版化學(xué)九年級上冊第一單元《-走進化學(xué)世界》測試試題(含答案)
- 2025年產(chǎn)品買賣協(xié)議常用版(4篇)
- 2025年個人車輛出租合同常用版(4篇)
- 2025年代理進口合同標準范文(2篇)
- 2025年九年級年級組長管理工作總結(jié)(四篇)
- 2025年人防工程施工合同(三篇)
- 2025年個人股權(quán)的投資協(xié)議(三篇)
- 2025年九年級班主任年度期末工作總結(jié)模版(二篇)
- 產(chǎn)業(yè)鏈競爭關(guān)聯(lián)度
- TTJSFB 002-2024 綠色融資租賃項目評價指南
- 涵洞施工鋼筋混凝土圓管涵
- 高考地理一輪復(fù)習(xí)學(xué)案+區(qū)域地理填圖+亞洲
- 全新車位轉(zhuǎn)讓協(xié)議模板下載(2024版)
- 高中數(shù)學(xué)必修一試卷及答案
- 砌筑工考試卷及答案
- 呼吸治療師進修匯報
- 智慧港口和自動化集裝箱碼頭
- 2024年江西電力職業(yè)技術(shù)學(xué)院單招職業(yè)技能測試題庫及答案解析
- 天合儲能:2024儲能專用電芯白皮書
評論
0/150
提交評論