商標(biāo)的顯著性為何是商標(biāo)的靈魂所在_第1頁(yè)
商標(biāo)的顯著性為何是商標(biāo)的靈魂所在_第2頁(yè)
商標(biāo)的顯著性為何是商標(biāo)的靈魂所在_第3頁(yè)
商標(biāo)的顯著性為何是商標(biāo)的靈魂所在_第4頁(yè)
商標(biāo)的顯著性為何是商標(biāo)的靈魂所在_第5頁(yè)
已閱讀5頁(yè),還剩19頁(yè)未讀, 繼續(xù)免費(fèi)閱讀

下載本文檔

版權(quán)說(shuō)明:本文檔由用戶(hù)提供并上傳,收益歸屬內(nèi)容提供方,若內(nèi)容存在侵權(quán),請(qǐng)進(jìn)行舉報(bào)或認(rèn)領(lǐng)

文檔簡(jiǎn)介

廣東東軟學(xué)院本科畢業(yè)論文IVTRADEMARKPROTECTION4.1TrademarkRightsTrademarkrightsrefertotheexclusiverightsenjoyedbytrademarkownersovertheirtrademarks.Inourcountry,theprincipleoftrademarkregistrationisimplementedduetotheacquisitionoftrademarkrights.Therefore,trademarkrightsareactuallytheexclusiverightsthatareappliedforbythetrademarkownerandconfirmedbytheStateTrademarkOffice.Theexclusiverightsareresultingfromtheregistrationofthetrademark.Atrademarkisacommercialsignusedtodistinguishdifferentsourcesofgoodsandservices.Itiscomposedofwords,graphics,letters,numbers,three-dimensionalsigns,colorcombinations,sounds,oracombinationoftheaboveelements.4.2DistinctivenessandTrademarkProtectionInthemarket,thedistinctivenessofsomenewproductsisoftenmorenoticeablethanthedistinctivenessofthetrademarkusedontheproduct,whichiseasytoidentify.Thedistinctivenessofatrademarkmustultimatelybeassociatedwithaspecificgoodorservice.Ifthemarkitselflacksdistinctivefeatures,butcanenableconsumerstodistinguishthegoodsorservicesthatusethemarkfromothers,themarkitgoesbeyondthemeaningofthelogoitselfandhasthefunctionofcommendingspecificgoodsorservices.Inthecasethatthegoodsproducedbysomeproducersareuniqueandnew,andonlyprovidedbyacertainproducer,becausethegoodsthemselveshaveadistinguishingfunctionandthegoodsareassociatedwiththetrademark,thedistinguishingfunctionsofthegoodscanbetransferred.Asforthetrademark,thedistinctivenessoftheproducthasgiventhetrademarkdistinctiveness,andthecommodityhasbeenstrengthenedasatrademark.Thedistinctivenessoftrademarkisapremiseforobtainingtrademarkrightandlegalprotection.Theconditionsfortrademarkregistrationincludelegality,distinctiveness,non-functionalityandpriority.Amongthem,distinctivenessisthecorerequirementfortrademarkregistrationtoobtaintrademarkright.Thelawallowsregistrationoflogosthatmeettherequirementstoobtaintrademarkrightandprotectthemintheformoftrademark.Thisrequiresthattheregisteredlogoscanreflectthemostbasicfunctionsofthetrademark.Asmentionedabove,theessentialfunctionofatrademarkisreflectedinthedistinctiveness.Whetheramarkhasdistinctivenessornotisthemostimportantfactorforitssuccessfulregistrationandlegalprotection.Amarkwithoutdistinctivenesscannotbeprotectedasatrademark.Signsarerequiredtohavedistinctivecharacteristics.Withoutdistinctivesign,consumerscannotautomaticallyassociateitwiththegoodsorservicesoftheoperator,andtheoperatordoesnotneedtoadoptthesign.Thereisanincreasinginterestintrademarksthatlackdistinctivenessbutcanachievedistinctivenessthroughuse.Withtherapidchangesinthemodernworld,somedescriptivebutlackingdistinctivenesstrademarksareoftenrecognizedbecauseoftheiruniqueways.Intoday’sinformationage,all-roundadvertisingofvariousmediaoftenmakesatrademarkwell-knowninashortperiodoftimeandletitgainsahighreputation,greatlyspeedinguptrademarkwhichlacksdistinctivenesstogaindistinctiveness.MoreManufacturersboldlyusedthe“personalized”trademarktocatertopeople’spreferences,suchasDanone’s“Mizone”brandbeverage.Inthepast,therewerefewtrademarksthatlackdistinctiveness,andtraditionallytrademarkslackingdistinctivenesswerenotprotected.Butnowtrademarkslackingdistinctivenessareeverywhere.Mostofthemareunregisteredtrademarksandnotrademarkrights.Iftheyareinfringed,theyarehardlyprotectedbytheTrademarkLawandtheLawagainstUnfairCompetitionofthePRC.Theuncertaintyoftrademarkrightskeepstrademarksinanunstablestateandisalsopronetosquatting.Oncecybersquattingoccurs,itistheoriginalmanufacturersandconsumersthatareharmed,andthestabilityofthemarketisdestroyedonalargerscale.Itcanbeseenthatunderthenewsituation,itisnecessaryandreasonabletoprovidebetterlegalprotectionfortrademarksthatlackdistinctiveness.Chinamayconsiderregisteringandprotectingthetrademarkslackingdistinctiveness,andstipulatingtheprotectionperiod,orgrantingleaningprotectioninrelatedlitigation,orlookingforlegalprotectionmethodssuitableforChina’snationalconditions.4.3SignificanceThedistinctivenessofatrademarkisthesouloftrademarkprotection.Adistinctivebranddesignandagoodreputationpraisedbyeveryonehavealwaysbeenthegoalspursuedbysuccessfulcompanies.Thecompanyalwaystakesthedistinctivenessofthetrademarkastheguideline,andformulatesandimplementsvariousstrategiesaroundthecoreofaffectingconsumerpsychology,soastowinconsumers'favorforcorporateproductsandcontinuouslyincreaseproductmarketshare.Protectingthedistinctivenessoftrademarkshelpsconsumersquicklyidentifyandchooseamongsimilarproductsthatcompetewithothers.Atrademarkwithstrongdistinctivenessandrecognizedbyconsumersoftenrepresentsgoodqualityandperfectservice.Thegoodimageitestablishesisaproofthatthecompanyhasgainedthetrustofcustomers.CONCLUSIONAtrademarkisadistinctivemark,anddistinctivenessisacharacteristicthatamarkmustpossessinordertobecomeatrademark.Itcanbeseenthatthedefinitionsoftrademarksanddistinctivenesscirculatebackandforth."Whatisatrademark"and"Whatisdistinctiveness"areactuallydifferentexpressionsofthesamequestion,whichhighlightstheimportanceofdistinctivenessresearchintrademarktheory.Distinctness,astheessenceandsoulofatrademark,determineswhetheratrademarkcanbelegallyrecognizedandprotectedornot.Thestrengthofthedistinctivenessofthetrademarkdeterminesthescopeofthetrademarkprotection.Asthe"soul"oftrademarkprotectionandthe"hub"ofthenormaloperationoftrademarklaw,thedistinctivenessoftrademarkshasalwaysreceivedspecialattentionfromthetheoreticalandphysicalscene.Theauthorhopestodiscussthebasictheoreticalissuesoftrademarkdistinctivenessthroughthisthesis,clarifytheconceptsandrelationshipsoftrademarkdistinctivenessandrelatedwords,andanalyzethesignificanceoftrademarkdistinctivenesstotrademarkrightsandtrademarkprotection.REFERENCES[1]WeiJilin.[魏紀(jì)林],知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)法學(xué),武漢理工大學(xué)出版社,2003.[2]PengXuelong.[彭學(xué)龍],商標(biāo)顯著性傳統(tǒng)理論評(píng)析,電子知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán),2006(02).[3]ZhaoYixv.[趙一旭],XvHaonan.[徐浩男],LiangBo.[梁波],商標(biāo)顯著性判定法律問(wèn)題研究,天津大學(xué),2016.[4]QianMaorui.[錢(qián)矛銳],QingMei.[

溫馨提示

  • 1. 本站所有資源如無(wú)特殊說(shuō)明,都需要本地電腦安裝OFFICE2007和PDF閱讀器。圖紙軟件為CAD,CAXA,PROE,UG,SolidWorks等.壓縮文件請(qǐng)下載最新的WinRAR軟件解壓。
  • 2. 本站的文檔不包含任何第三方提供的附件圖紙等,如果需要附件,請(qǐng)聯(lián)系上傳者。文件的所有權(quán)益歸上傳用戶(hù)所有。
  • 3. 本站RAR壓縮包中若帶圖紙,網(wǎng)頁(yè)內(nèi)容里面會(huì)有圖紙預(yù)覽,若沒(méi)有圖紙預(yù)覽就沒(méi)有圖紙。
  • 4. 未經(jīng)權(quán)益所有人同意不得將文件中的內(nèi)容挪作商業(yè)或盈利用途。
  • 5. 人人文庫(kù)網(wǎng)僅提供信息存儲(chǔ)空間,僅對(duì)用戶(hù)上傳內(nèi)容的表現(xiàn)方式做保護(hù)處理,對(duì)用戶(hù)上傳分享的文檔內(nèi)容本身不做任何修改或編輯,并不能對(duì)任何下載內(nèi)容負(fù)責(zé)。
  • 6. 下載文件中如有侵權(quán)或不適當(dāng)內(nèi)容,請(qǐng)與我們聯(lián)系,我們立即糾正。
  • 7. 本站不保證下載資源的準(zhǔn)確性、安全性和完整性, 同時(shí)也不承擔(dān)用戶(hù)因使用這些下載資源對(duì)自己和他人造成任何形式的傷害或損失。

最新文檔

評(píng)論

0/150

提交評(píng)論