《傲慢與偏見》與《簡(jiǎn)愛》中女主角的性格分析

AThesisSubmittedinPartialFulfillmentoftheRequirementsfortheDegreeofBachelorofArtse].3.2.TheDifferenceoftheCharacter3.2.1.TheDifferenceoftheFamilyBackgroundJaneEyre,shealwaysthoughtthatsheisprettyflat,lowstatus,poor,insignificant,onlywithadull,austerelife,likewildflowersandweeds,noonetoclimb,tofendforthemselves.Buttheflamesoflovebetweenherandhermaster.Atfirstsheburiedlovedeepinherheart.Intea,lunchandeveningwalk,sheasfaraspossible,calm,butwhenalone,sheopenedthegateofmemory,theygetalongwiththesceneofaclearreappearance,intoxicatedinthedeephappiness.ShetriedmanytimestotestthemarriageofMr.RochesterandMissIngram,andMr.RochesterpretendedtobeintimatewithMissIngram.Theytesteachotherandexamineeachother,infact,theyhavealreadyinthesoultogether.Mr.Rochester'sunforgettableloveforJane,"Isometimeshaveastrangefeelingforyou-especially,likenow,whenyoucomenearme,somewhereundermyleftrib,thereseemstobeachordwithasimilarstringinthesameplaceasyourlittlebody,anditistightlyclosedandcannotbesolved.Ifthechoppystraitsand200ofmilesoflandhaveseparatedusfar,atthattime,myheartwouldbleedtothewomanwhopleasesmeonlybyappearances,whenIfindthattheyhaveneithersoulnorconscience-whentheyshowmemediocrity,superficiality,andperhapslowenergy,vulgarity,anddryness,Iamatotaldemon.ButIamalwaysgentleandfaithfultoBrighteyes,eloquenttongues,thesouloffire,andthegentleandsteady,docileandsteadfastcharacterthatcanbendandnotbebroken.T3.2.2.TheDifferenceoftheCulturalLevelhewordstouchedbothJaneandthereader.Butjustwhentwopeopleareabouttogetmarried,anunexpectedthinghappenedsuddenly,becauseJaneEyrelearnedthatRochesteractuallyhadawife-eventhoughthewifeisamadman,hasbeenRochesterhidingatThornfieldformanyyears.JaneEyrefinallydecidedtoleaveRochester,tofindtherealhappinessoftheirown.ShecametoSwampHillunderafortuitouscoincidence,revealingDiana,MaryandSt.John.Finallyshefoundthatthethreewerehercousins,heraunt'schildren,JaneEyre,whohadinheritedheruncle'sinheritanceandbecamerich.ButshefinallydecidedtogobacktoRochester.Butaftershehadgone,ThornfieldHallwasburnttoashesbyRochester'smadwife.WhenJaneEyrefoundRochester,hewasblind,butthetwoeventuallylivedtogetherandhadhappiness.3.2.3.TheDifferenceoftheLifeExperienceFewpeoplewillbelikeJaneforloveforthepersonalityofabandonall,andnohesitation.JustlikeElizabeth,shewillrefuseDarcyforavarietyofreasons,andJaneEyreshowsusisakindofsimplification,isakindofreturntosimplicity,isapursuitofthehearttopaythefeeling,isaButherofthesimplefeelings,itislikeaglassoficewater,purifytheheartsofeveryreader,butalsoarousethereaders,especiallythefemalereadersresonate.4.ConclusionWiththereformandopening-upofChinaandthecontinuouscollisionoftheworldeconomy,thecommunicationbetweenculturesisbecomingmoreandmoreclose.Withtheimprovementofeconomiclevel,peoplehavebecomemoreandmorehighdemandforlife,moreandmorepeopleurgentlyneedtoenterthespiritualneedsfrommaterialneeds.People'sdemandforliteraryworksextendsfromdomestictoabroad."PrideandPrejudice"and"JaneEyre"aretheworld'sclassicclassics,writersareJaneAustenandCharlotteBronte,arewell-knownBritishfemalewriters,theirworkshavebeenwidelycirculatedbylatergenerations,isavaluableassetinworldliterature,influencedbythelifetime,Mostoftheirworksarerelatedtotheemancipationofwomen,sowomenhavemanysimilaritiesintheirwritings,"PrideandPrejudice"inElizabethandJaneEyreinthetwoworksoftheclassicimage,theyhavetheirownideasaboutmoney,marriage,atthesametimetherearesimilaritiesanddifferencesinpersonality,Therefore,thestudyofthissubjectpaysattentiontothecomparativeanalysisbetweentheircharacters.Fromthepointofviewofreality,ElizabethBennetandJaneEyrereflectthesocialreality,femininestatusandfeminineconsciousnessoftheirtimesinsomeextent.Throughcomparisonandanalysisoftheirpersonalsplendor,whetheritisElizabethorJaneEyre,theirlifeprocessreflectsdifferentviewsofloveandfemaleconsciousness,Ithinkthatsuchtwodifferentconceptsandconsciousnessareworthyofourcontemporarypeopletoin-depthanalysis.Byanalyzingthem,wecanthinkofourownviewofloveandvalues.Bibliography[1]袁學(xué)敏.論女性自我救贖意識(shí)之覺醒——從《再生緣》到《傲慢與偏見》[J].攀枝花學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào)，2017，34（04）：47-53.[2]劉亞超.邊緣到中心——從《茶花女》、《簡(jiǎn)愛》、《傲慢與偏見》看女權(quán)主義的發(fā)展[J].齊齊哈爾師范高等?？茖W(xué)校學(xué)報(bào)，2016（04）：25-27.[3]王彤.淺析簡(jiǎn)?奧斯汀的《傲慢與偏見》[J].生物技術(shù)世界，2015（05）：163.[4]鐘瑜寧，張申艷.女性主義視角下的《簡(jiǎn)愛》和《傲慢與偏見》[J].語文建設(shè)，2014（21）：60-61.[5]沈娟.從人物語言風(fēng)格論電影《傲慢與偏見》[J].電影文學(xué)，2014（10）：80-81.[6]鮑丙琴.平行研究在比較紅學(xué)中的方法論意義[J].河南教育學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào)（哲學(xué)社會(huì)科學(xué)版），2013，32（06）：6-10.[7]周淑茹.論《傲慢與偏見》中的女性意識(shí)——從伊麗莎白拒婚談起[J].名作欣賞，2013（33）：73-75.[8]李素芬.從女性主義角度分析《簡(jiǎn)?愛》對(duì)《傲慢與偏見》的超越[J].名作欣賞，2013（27）：43-44.[9]張?jiān)?論《傲慢與偏見》與《簡(jiǎn)?愛》中的紳士形象[J].南昌教育學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào)，2013，28（07）：25-26.[10]程永艷，湯建民.科學(xué)計(jì)量學(xué)視野下的《傲慢與偏見》研究——一個(gè)案例性的探究[J].浙江科技學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào)，2013，25（02）：81-87.[11]鄭奎娥.解讀簡(jiǎn)?奧斯丁《傲慢與偏見》婚戀觀思想的應(yīng)有視角[J].才智，2013（08）：232.[12]賴慈蕓.埋名異鄉(xiāng)五十載——大陸譯作在臺(tái)灣[J].東方翻譯，2013（01）：49-58.[13]魏庭圓.《簡(jiǎn)?愛》與《傲慢與偏見》中兩個(gè)叛逆角色之比較[J].群文天地，2012（24）：60.[14]吳穎，廖紅燕.論英語頭韻修辭的特點(diǎn)及翻譯——以《傲慢與偏見》為例[J].湖北第二師范學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào)，2012，29（11）：114-116+120.[15]劉云靜.18—19世紀(jì)英國(guó)女性意識(shí)的覺醒及其邊緣化特性——以奧斯汀的《傲慢與偏見》為例[J].山西師大學(xué)報(bào)（社會(huì)科學(xué)版），2012，39（04）：133-135.[16]高玉秋.居住空間的意象蘊(yùn)含——《傲慢與偏見》和《簡(jiǎn)?愛》的相關(guān)語境[J].外國(guó)問題研究，2012（02）：75-78.[17]韓欣華.《傲慢與偏見》，從小說到電影[J].電影文學(xué)，2012（11）：72-73.[18]陳惠君.論女性主義的彰顯與不足——兼評(píng)《傲慢與偏見》、《簡(jiǎn)愛》、《德伯家的苔絲》[J].湖北經(jīng)濟(jì)學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào)（人文社會(huì)科學(xué)版），2012，9（04）：117-118.[19]張霞，周盛.女性意識(shí)的發(fā)展和超越——再讀《傲慢與偏見》和《簡(jiǎn)?愛》[J].長(zhǎng)春理工大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)（社會(huì)科學(xué)版），2012，25（02）：85-86.[20]劉潔，田建國(guó).簡(jiǎn)?奧斯丁與夏?勃朗特的女性主義比較研究以《傲慢與偏見》和《簡(jiǎn)?愛》為例[J].西北工業(yè)大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)（社會(huì)科學(xué)版），2011，31（03）：35-39.[21]Brownstein,RachelM.1994.IronyandAuthority:NewCasebooksSenseandSensibilityandPrideandPrejudice.NewYork:St.Martin'sPress,Inc.[22]Copeland,Edward&McMaster,Juliet.2001.JaneAusten.Shanghai:ShanghaiForeignLanguageEducationPress.[23]Davis,Philip.2007.TheIrctorians.Beijing:ForeignLanguageTeachingandReseaxchPress.[24]Deborah,L.Madsen.2006.FeministTheoryandLiteraryPractice.Beijing:ForeignLanguageTeachingandResearchPress.[25]Gang,Zhu.2001.TwentiethCenturyWesternCriticalTheories.Shanghai:ShanghaiForeignLanguageEducationPress.[26]Gilbert,Sandra.2000.CriticalConditio