




版權(quán)說明:本文檔由用戶提供并上傳,收益歸屬內(nèi)容提供方,若內(nèi)容存在侵權(quán),請進行舉報或認領(lǐng)
文檔簡介
Urban
MobilityReadiness
Index2023
REPORTForewordMobility
lies
atthe
centerofa
global
inflection
point.Record?breakingheatwaves,
inflation,
and
supply
chainshiftshave
dominated
headlinesand
disrupted
urban
vitality
as
people
decidehow
andwhy
theytravel.These
challengeshave
a
profound
impact
on
societyby
settinga
newparadigmwhere
it’s
gettingincreasingly
difficultto
ensure
affordable
andsustainablemobility
solutions.However,
doublingdown
onthe
simplebuilding
blocks
of
urbanmobility,likeefficient
public
transitor
safer
infrastructure
forpedestrians
andcyclists,can
keepdowntowns
andbusiness
centersbuzzing.An
emphasis
on
those
mobility
fundamentals
lies
at
thecenterofthe2023edition
of
theUrban
Mobility
Readiness
Index,a
rankingof
65globalcities
onhowpreparedtheyareformobility’snextchapter,createdbytheOliverWymanForum
andthe
University
of
California,Berkeley.
Alongside
commentary
oneach
city
andregionalstrengthsand
challenges,
thisyear’sedition
introducestailored
recommendationsfor
eachcity’s
most
important
challenges:how
toimprove
publictransit
andoverall
sustainablemobility
dimensions.Thisedition
marksthefifthanniversaryoftheUrban
Mobility
ReadinessIndex.
Bytrackingprogress
witheach
annualedition,
we
canmonitor
acity’s
evolution
over
a
longer
period
aswell
asits
year?over?yearprogress.Reflecting
onthattrajectory,
whetherit’s
oneyear
orfive,
iscriticaltoidentifyingwinningstrategies.We
hope
thatby
focusingattention
onthesimple
essentials
of
urbanmobility,
business
and
policy
leaderscan
be
encouraged
andmotivatedto
build
a
more
sustainable
and
equitablefuture.Guillaume
ThibaultPartnerandMobilityCo?lead,OliverWyman
ForumAlexandre
BayenProfessor,ElectricalEngineeringandComputerScience,UC
Berkeley3Contents4Foreword36IntroductionWhy
Cities
Should
Focus
On
Mobility
Fundamentals10Regional
AnalysisCity
Profiles1628170176About
the
IndexReferences5IntroductionCHARTINGA
NEW
COURSE
FOR
URBAN
MOBILITYThe
fifth
anniversary
of
theUrbanMobility
ReadinessIndexintroduces
tailoredrecommendationstoimprove
publictransitandsustainablemobilityforeach
city.
It’s
a
leapforward
for
theIndex
to
movebeyond
a
year?in?review
reportto
instead
become
anactionable
tool
for
business
andcityleaders.These
recommendationscomplementfour
key
trendsidentified
inthisyear’sedition
thatwilldefineurbanmobilityfor
thenearfuture.SustainableInvestmentSupply
ChainRisksEconomicPressuresConvenientMass
TransitIncreasedinvestmentsinsustainablemobilityarepayingoff,
withmoreconsumerembracesofelectricvehicles,cycling,andcar?freezones.Europeancitiesmaintainedtheirleadershipinsustainablemobility.Manufacturershavestrengthenedsupplychainsagainstgeopoliticaleventsviamulti?sourcingandlocalization.InflationandsupplychainshiftshaveLeadingAsiancitiesofferthehighestratesofpublictransitstationdensityandridershiplevels,whileEuropeancounterpartsofferdiversemodaloptionsthatarefastandoperateatlong
hours.disruptedtravelflows.Citiesandbusinessesneedtokeeppublictransitfaresaffordabletorecoupridershiplevelsandkeepcitycenters
buzzing.However,
resourcescarcities—especiallyfornewtechnologies—challengesupplychains.6The2023
Indexincludes
a
selection
of65globalcities
across
five
regions:Asia
Pacific,
Europe,
Latin
America,
the
Middle
East
and
Africa
andNorth
AmericaCitiesaddedin
2023The
top
performing
cities
are
clustered
in
North
America,
Europe,
and
Asia
PacificEuropeNorth
AmericaAsia
PacificMiddle
East
and
AfricaLatin
AmericaSource:OliverWymanForumandUniversityofCalifornia,Berkeley7TheIndexcaptureswhat
business,
consumers,
andpolicymakers
considerindispensable
for
urbanmobilityUrban
Mobility
ReadinessIndexSustainable
Mobilitysub?indexPublic
Transitsub?indexMobilityreadinessisholisticallymeasuredby
56
KPIsacrosssocialimpact,infrastructure,innovation,systemefficiency,andmarket
attractiveness.Firstlaunchedin2021,theSustainableMobilitysub?indexmeasurescities’effortstobuildgreenerandmoresustainablemobilityecosystems.Launchedin2022,thePublicTransitsub?indexmeasurescities’performanceonpublictransitdensity,efficiency,andutilizationrate.Succeeding
inthesefive
dimensionsiscriticalfor
a
winningmobilityecosystemSocialimpactmetricsarebasedonvolatilevariablemeasuresthatoftenprove
controversialformunicipalgovernmentstoregulate,suchascommutingtime,trafficfluidity,publictransitutilization,commuterdensity,carownership,vehicleoccupancy,populationdensity,roadsafety,airquality,andinternationalairport
volumes.Social
ImpactInfrastructuremetricsfocusonstaticmeasuresthatarelikelytoremainnearconstantover
timeorareatleastdifficulttochange,suchasthedensityofpublictransitstations,thewalkabilityofacity,andthestrengthofacity’smultimodalnetworks.InfrastructureMarketattractivenessisbasedonmarket?drivenmetricsover
whichmunicipalgovernmentscanexertinfluence,suchasthecompetitivenessandpenetrationofsharing?economybusinessmodelsinmobility,multimodalappmaturityandavailability,fleetmanagement,internetconnectivity,andthescopeofinternationalairport
connections.Market
AttractivenessSystem
EfficiencyInnovationSystemefficiencymetricsfocusoncontrollablefactorsthatareinfluencedby
marketdynamicsandthepublicsector,suchaspublictransportoperatinghours,publictransportaffordability,publictransportreliability,andtrafficmanagement.Innovationisatechnology?relatedmetriclinkedtoemergingtechnologies,suchasconnectedautonomousvehicles,electrification,andadvancedconnectivity.Itconsidersthecitygovernment’sinvestmentandcommitmenttothesetechnologies,andthecity’sabilitytoattractandkeephigh?techlaborand
startups.8The
2023
Urban
Mobility
Readiness
Index
ScoreThetopcitiesscorehighlyinadiversesetofmetrics,underscoringthe
importance
ofawell?rounded
playbook1
Helsinki2
Amsterdam3
Stockholm4
San
Francisco5
Munich6
Singapore7
Zurich8
Paris9
Copenhagen10
Berlin11
London12
NewYork13
Seoul14
Oslo15
HongKong16
Tokyo17
Washington,D.C.18
Chicago19
Boston20
Madrid21
Vancouver22
Sydney23
Los
Angeles24
Barcelona25
Toronto26
Montreal27
Atlanta28
Dubai29
Melbourne30
Beijing31
Houston32
Shanghai33
Milan34
Dublin35
Dallas36
Warsaw37
Istanbul38
Abu
Dhabi39
Moscow40
Rome41
Doha42
KualaLumpur43
Santiago44
Buenos
Aires45
Bangkok46
Sao
Paulo47
CapeTown48
Jeddah49
Jakarta50
Mexico
City51
Johannesburg52
Rio
de
Janeiro53
Riyadh54
Delhi55
Mumbai56
Cairo57
Bogota58
Monterrey59
Casablanca60
Manila61
Quito62
Lima63
Manama64
Nairobi65
LagosSource:OliverWymanForumandUniversityofCalifornia,Berkeley9Why
CitiesShould
FocusOn
MobilityFundamentalsSimple,
affordable,
andefficientmobilitysolutions
willhelpcities
navigate
economic
andclimate
disruptionIt’s
moreimportantthaneverforurbanmobilityto
emphasize
the
fundamentals.
Citiesthatofferaffordableandefficientmobility
withsimpleessentials—
likecycling
lanes
orefficienttrains
—
canbuffer
against
risks
likerecord?breaking
heatwaves
or
highliving
coststhatthreaten
how
and
why
peopletravel.Mobility
Readiness
Index,a
forward?lookingranking
ofhow
well?positioned
citiesare
to
leadmobility’snextchapter.Conducted
by
theOliver
WymanForum
inpartnership
withtheUniversity
ofCalifornia,Berkeley,
thecities
thattopped
thisyear’sedition
are
those
thatopted
forthesimplerbuildingblocks
ofurbantransport,
likeManycitiesaretryingtoaddresstheseproblems.Someare
investing
heavily
in
public
transitandcycling
infrastructure,while
othersareexperimenting
withnewpricing
strategiestolower
fares
orare
making
electricvehicle
(EV)purchasesmore
affordableandconvenient,according
to
the
2023
edition
of
theUrbaninfrastructure
andsystemsefficiency,
ratherthanmore
innovative
solutions
still
indevelopment,
likeautonomouscars.
For
theIndex’sfifthanniversary,thereportincludescityspecificrecommendationsonways
to
improvepublic
transitofferings
andtheir
sustainability.Helsinki
And
Amsterdam
Remain
Steady
At
The
Top,
While
London
And
Tokyo
DeclineHowtopcityrankingschangedfrom
2020?202312▲1.
Helsinki▲2.Amsterdam=
3.
Stockholm▼4.
SanFrancisco3456▼6.
Singapore78910111213141516▼11.
London▼12.NewYork▼15.
HongKong▼16.
TokyoSource:OliverWymanForumandUniversityofCalifornia,Berkeley11Why
Cities
Should
Focus
On
Mobility
FundamentalsNo
city
better
demonstrateshowimportantthese
factorsare
than
Helsinki,
whichclaimsthis
year’stop
overall
ranking.The
Finnishcapital
boastscar?free
zones,
largeinvestmentsinEV
charging
infrastructure,advanced
cyclinginfrastructure,
and
anexpandingpublic
transitnetwork
with
newlight
rail
andtram
projects.Increasing
publictransit
offerings
is
just
oneway
Helsinki’s
attemptingto
boost
ridership:It
also
makes
itaffordablewitha
roughly
$3ticketthatallows
commuters
to
rideon
anymode
of
transport.Cities
That
Consistently
Invest
inMobility
Make
StridesEven
cities
that
rankin
the
bottom
half
oftheIndexcan
makeleaps
forwardin
modernizingtheirmobility
systems
with
continualinvestmentin
themobility
essentials.Take
Jeddah
andBangkok,which
climbedtherankings
the
lasttwo
years
thanksto
determined
effortsto
boostpublictransitridershipwithaffordablefaresandconvenientservice.ConsideralsoMumbai,atopperformer
inroad
safety,
or
Casablanca,whichhasthe
highest
pedestrian
modalshare
inthe2023
Urban
Mobility
Readiness
sub?indices
PerformanceEuropeNorthAmericaAsiaPacificMiddleEastLatinAmericaAfrica80%60%40%20%0%Sustainable
MobilitySource:OliverWymanForumandUniversityofCalifornia,Berkeley1271%Index.
These
citiesdisplay
a
spirit
ofconsistenteffort
and
investmentin
improvingtheirmobilitynetworks
—
andare
climbing
up
theUrbanMobility
Readiness
Index
rankings
intheprocess.ThosethatslippedinourIndex,likeSingapore,Zurich,Boston,and
Los
Angeles,have
beenoutpacedby
other
citiesthat
are
acceleratingeffortsto
modernizetheirmobilitynetworks.These
citiesshould
continue
to
find
ways
toinnovate
and
make
real
progress
acrossa
rangeof
Index
metrics,from
EV
marketshare
andpublictransitusetoroadsafetyandengagementof
theprivate
sector.ThepercentageofalldistancetravelledinHongKong
viapublictransit;thecitysitsatopthe
PublicTransitsub?indexfor
thesecondstraightyear.Hong
Kong
Remains
a
Model
forPublic
Transit
AuthoritiesSome
citiesthat
already
offer
a
gold
standardof
mobilityservicescancontinueto
doubledown
ontheir
strengths
withcontinuedinvestment.
Consider
HongKong,
whichforthesecondyear
ina
row,
tops
ourPublicTransitSub?Index
thanksto
its
efficiency,affordability,
andaccessibility.
Thoseingredientshave
enabled
thecity’s
publictransitsystemto
accountfora
staggering
71%ofalldistance
traveled
withinHongKong.Andcityauthorities
continueto
bolster
thetransitsystemeven
further
—
in2023
itbeganwork
ona
newstation
thatwould
helpconnecttheeastern
andwesternparts
oftheNewTerritories
—
a
major
regionofHong
Kong.The
importanceofthese
continuedinvestmentscan’t
be
understated:
45%
of
consumers
saidthat
accessibilityand
availability
are
themost
important
factorsdriving
theirmobilitydecisions—
a
close
secondto
affordability,according
to
theOliver
Wyman
Forum’s
April2023survey.
Offeringa
dense
publictransit13Why
Cities
Should
Focus
On
Mobility
Fundamentals49%network
that’s
easyto
use
isa
wiseinvestmentforcities
thatwant
to
increasepublic
transitridership
andgrow
theireconomies:
Every$1
billioninvested
inpublictransport
generateseconomicreturnsfivetimes
asgreatand
creates50,000
jobs,according
to
C40,
a
coalition
ofThepercentageof96cities
thatadvocate
forclimate
action.1globalconsumersthatlistedaffordabilityasatopfactorinchoosingamobilitymode.Publictransit
affordability
mustremainatoppriorityfor
citiestomaintainridershiplevels.Inflation
and
Supply
ChainPressures
Challenge
Access
ToEssential
Mobility
ServicesProviding
affordable
publictransit
is
crucialforcities.
Highinflationrates
incombinationwith
supplychain
disruptionshave
squeezedhouseholdsgloballyanddelayed
theproductionofelectricvehiclesandbusesthatmay
delaycityplansonEV
uptake
andresult
in
highercostsin
doingso.
Meanwhile,
a
tight
labor
marketinmany
countriesexacerbatestheissueby
leavingsome
suppliers
withouttruck
drivers
to
delivergoods
whilesome
publictransit
agencies
struggleto
retain
workers
to
deliver
reliableservice.Intensifyingregional
competition
betweenEurope,
North
America,and
Chinato
morecloselyintegrate
value
chainsindicate
how
themobility
industryevolves
in
thecomingyears:Chinahasa
wellspringofraw
materials
tomanufactureEVs,
whilethe
US
seeksto
onshoresemiconductor
manufacturing.Europe’sdecentralized
industry
modelwillmakeitdifficultto
localizesupplychains—
althoughtheregiongenerallyoffersmany
incentives
tobuy
EVs.
Theregionalsupplychain
dynamicswillripplethroughthe
economic
tissue
of
citiesandtheirmobility
systems.Public
transit
ridership
has
notreturnedto
pre?pandemiclevels
formost
cities
inthe
Index,whichstrains
an
essential
urban14function
thatis
also
challengedby
higherConsider
cities
likeAmsterdam,
Berlin,energyand
maintenance
costs.
TheAmericanPublicTransitAssociationfoundthat
71%
ofthe
largest
transit
agencies
willface
a
fiscalcliffin
thenext
five
years
whilea
EuropeanUnionstudy
notessignificantloss
in
post?pandemicrevenues.2,3
Andwith
nearly
half
of
consumerscitingaffordabilityand
accessibility
as
the
mostimportant
factors
when
choosinghow
to
travel,according
to
a
Forum
survey,
it’s
vital
thatcitiesbe
resolute
in
satisfying
these
expectations.andMunich.Theyprovide
everythingfromworld?renowned
cycling
culture
to
strongpublic
transitofferings,
earning
themtop?10finishes
in
the
Sustainable
Mobility
sub?indexforthesecondconsecutive
year.
Whilenaturalgas
or
fossil
fuels
still
account
for
largepercentages
oftheir
energy
production,
boththe
Dutchand
Germangovernments
havecommitted
to
transitioning
to
cleaner
sources.Oslo,
whichrelies
ona
nationalhydropowersystem
to
generatenearlyall
of
itselectricity,extended
itsreign
asthetop?rankedcityin
theSomegovernmentsincluded
inthe
indexarebeingproactive
about
making
publictransitmore
affordable.
Berlin
and
Munich,forexample,benefitfrom
Germany’srecentDeutschlandTicket,which
lets
commutersuse
all
local
masstransitforroughly
$52
perSustainable
Mobility
sub?index.
That
clean8energypowers
animpressive
EV
fleet—
whichaccountedformore
than
80%of
new
car
salesin
thesecond
quarter
of2023.
Norway
alsoplansfor
zero?emission
vehiclesto
accountforallnewcarregistrations
beginning
in2025.month.
Seoul,similarly,
plansto
releasea4masstransitpassthat
would
allow
riderstouse
allsubway
and
bus
lines
and
thecity’s
bike?sharing
service
in2024.5Boston,Urban
vitalitydepends
onaffordable,
convenient,andsustainablemobility
networks.
Asglobalpressures
stress
livelihoodsandtheclimate,citiesmustfutureprooftheirfeasibilityasplacesto
live
andwork.A
return
to
fundamentalsthat
keepmobilitysustainable,accessible,andefficientcanstrengthenthatvitality.meanwhile,
is
studying
thefeasibility
ofoffering
flexible
transit
fares
based
onincomelevels.6Clean
Energy
Generation
Gets
theSpotlight
for
Sustainable
MobilityThewar
inUkrainefocusedattention
onwhatenergy
sources
countries
use
andhow
theysource
them.It’s
a
facet
of
thelargerproblem:how
mobilitycantruly
be
sustainableifit’s
powered
by
oilandgasorcarbon?heavyenergy
generation.
Citiesthat
are
reliantoncarbon?heavy
energy
are
off
track
tomeetingtheir
climategoals,according
to
anOliver
WymanForum
analysis.
Butmany
of
the7top
cities
in
the
Sustainable
Mobility
sub?indexare
makingconcentrated
effortsto
pursuemoreeco?friendlyalternatives.15Reg
iona
lA
na
lysisThe
fundamentals
of
mobilityaremoreimportant
thanever,
andeach
globalregionhasuniquestrengthsinthosebuildingblocks.
Some
offer
efficientandcost?effectivepublictransitsystems,
encourage
micromobilitylike
cycling
orwalking,
orlimitroadcongestion
withcar?freezones.AsiaPacific1820222426EuropeLatinAmericaMiddleEastandAfricaNorth
AmericaUnderstanding
each
region’s
distinctcharacteristics
provides
a
crucialbackdrop
for
city?by?cityinsights.1617Regional
AnalysisAsia
Pacif
ic2023vs.
2022?2Cities
in
theAsia
Pacific
run
the
gamutfromleading
citiesto
those
thatare
stilldevelopingorlagging
in
urbanmobilityreadiness.
Theleading
cities
offerpublictransit
systemsthatare
affordable,
efficient,andhave
highstation
densities
that
make
personal
cars
lessnecessary.
Hong
Kong,which
leadsthePublicTransitsub?index
for
thesecondyear
inarow,
hasa
public
transitsystemthatcovers
animpressive
71%
of
all
distancetraveled
withinthecity,
according
to
anOliver
WymanForumSingaporeSeoul613↓↑
+7↑
+2HongKongTokyo1516==00Sydney22293032424549545560MelbourneBeijingn/a+1↑ShanghaiKuala
LumpurBangkokJakarta↑
+3+1↑
+2↑=0?10analysis.
Singapore,
similarly,
withan
efficient9Delhi↓=anddensepublic
transitsystem,isalsoa
topfinisher
in
thePublic
Transitsub?index.MumbaiManila↑
+2Andyet,
the
regioncancontinue
to
improvepublic
transitstationdensity.
Shanghai,
forexample,performs
belowaverage
in
thisregard,
butits
plansto
increase
thenumber
ofstations
andrail
linesdemonstrate
a
pathtoimprovement
forthe
region.10Cycling
also
is
nota
popular
mode
oftransportation
acrossseveralAsia
Pacific
cities,which
hampers
effortsto
reducecomparativelevels
ofnoise
andlight
pollution.
Both
DelhiandSingapore,
however,
have
committed
toredesigningcity
roads
to
make
room
formorecyclistsandpedestrians.Theregion
is
rebounding
inIndexrankingsafter
shaking
offtravel
restrictionsfromthecoronavirus
pandemicthat
continuedthrough
2022.
These
restrictions
mostlyimpacted
airport
connectivity
and
passengervolumes—
particularly
in
China.And
although18Urban
Mobility
Readiness
Index,
Sustainable
Mobility
and
Public
TransitDistributionofAsianPacificcities’scoresin
percentageSingapore
69.5%Urban
Mobility
ReadinessSustainable
MobilityPublic
TransitHong
Kong
64.9%Singapore
73.9%Source:OliverWymanForumandUniversityofCalifornia,Berkeleyairtravel
measurementswere
stilllow
inthebeginning
of2023,
numbershave
reportedlyrebounded
in
cities
like
Beijing
andShanghai.Dimensions
of
the
Urban
Mobility
ReadinessIndex
scoreRegionalscoresinpercentageacrossthefivedimensionscomparedwithglobal
averageOtherregional
challenges
includea
possibleshift
insupply
chaininfrastructure
in
Asia,anda
declineof
global
electricvehicle
marketsales
as
Europe
accelerates
thepivot
away
fromcombustionenginevehicles.AsiaPacificGlobalSocialImpact54.4%100%75%Innovation40.7%Infrastructure50%50.8%25%SystemEfficiencyMarketAttractiveness51.3%57.3%Source:OliverWymanForumandUniversityofCalifornia,Berkeley19Regional
AnalysisEurope2023vs.
2022European
cities
earnedthehighest
scores
intheUrban
Mobility
Readiness
Index,claimingmost
ofthe
top
10
spots
in
theoverall
rankingandthe
Public
Transit
andSustainable
Mobilitysub?indices.
Their
success
isowed
to
highlevelsofpublictransit
usage
andelectricvehicle(EV)market
shares,
asexemplifiedby
Nordiccities
likeHelsinki,Stockholm,Oslo,
andCopenhagen.Oslo,
withits
monikeras
the“EVcapital
ofthe
world,”
benefitsfrom
a
nationalgovernment
bent
on
zero?emissionvehiclesaccountingforall
new
car
registrations
in2025.Andeven
with
denseEV
penetration,
thesecitiescontinueto
incentivize
residentsto
shiftfrom
combustionenginecars.Amsterdam,
forexample,
aimsto
have
onechargingstationforevery
fourEVs.11HelsinkiAmsterdamStockholmMunichZurich12↑
+2↑
+43↓?15↑
+27↓↑?2+1n/a?1Paris8CopenhagenBerlin91011↓=LondonOslo0142024333436373940↑
+5MadridBarcelonaMilan↑↑=+1+10Dublin=0WarsawIstanbulMoscowRome↑↑↓+1+1?3n/aTheir
public
transitnetworks
are
efficientandmultimodalwith
nationalconnections,allowingfor
seamlesscommuterjourneyseven
withfirst?
andlast?mile
gaps.Typically,with
integrated
apps
that
makeplanningandpayment
convenient,
European
publictransitnetworks
are
anattractive
caralternative
formany.
European
cities
can
maketheir
publictransitnetworks
even
strongerby
upgradingexistingsubway
systemsandimplementingautonomous
technology.Active
mobility
modes,
likecycling
andwalking,arealsoa
popular
choiceamongEuropeans.
These
citiestypically
have
densecycling
infrastructure
andcar?free
zonesthatempower
pedestrians
andcyclists.
No
citybetter
exemplifies
thistrend
thanAmsterdam,20Urban
Mobility
Readiness
Index,
Sustainable
Mobility
and
Public
TransitDistributionofAsianPacificcities’scoresin
percentageHelsinki
70.9%Urban
Mobility
ReadinessSustainable
MobilityPublic
TransitOslo
76.8%Zurich
74.0%Source:OliverWymanForumandUniversityofCalifornia,Berkeleywhere
more
thana
quarterofall
tripsare
madeby
bike,
with
plansto
increasethat
rate
to
35%of
all
tripsby
2030.12
Continuedinvestmentsinactive
mobilityinfrastructurewouldraise
airqualitylevels
to
even
greaterheights.Dimensions
of
the
Urban
Mobility
ReadinessIndex
scoreRegionalscoresinpercentageacrossthefivedimensionscomparedwithglobal
averageEuropeGlobalSocialImpact66.3%100%75%Innovation41%Infrastructure50%69.6%25%SystemEfficiencyMarketAttractiveness60.5%64%Source:OliverWymanForumandUniversityofCalifornia,Berkeley21Regional
AnalysisLatin
America2023vs.
2022Latin
American
citiesare
developing
or
laggingin
theirmobility
maturity,
both
in
publicSantiagoBuenosAiresSaoPauloMexicoCityRiode
JaneiroBogota43444650525761↓=?10transit
andsustainability
measuresoverall.
Yetmany
cities
in
theregion
are
improving
thesedimensions
by
increasing
electricvehicle
(EV)use
orby
expandingpublic
transitofferings.=0↓↓↓=?2?1?10QuitoBogota,
forexample,
expectsto
have
thelargest
electricbusfleet
ofany
cityintheworldoutside
of
Chinaby
theendof2023.13
ElsewhereMonterrey
willbenefitfrom
a
$5.4
billionstate?wide
planto
double
the
city’s
metro
andintroducea
new
fleet
of
low?emission
buses.14And
while
these
effortswillstrengthentheregion’s
alreadymultimodalpublictransitofferings,
theregion
shouldseekto
impro
溫馨提示
- 1. 本站所有資源如無特殊說明,都需要本地電腦安裝OFFICE2007和PDF閱讀器。圖紙軟件為CAD,CAXA,PROE,UG,SolidWorks等.壓縮文件請下載最新的WinRAR軟件解壓。
- 2. 本站的文檔不包含任何第三方提供的附件圖紙等,如果需要附件,請聯(lián)系上傳者。文件的所有權(quán)益歸上傳用戶所有。
- 3. 本站RAR壓縮包中若帶圖紙,網(wǎng)頁內(nèi)容里面會有圖紙預(yù)覽,若沒有圖紙預(yù)覽就沒有圖紙。
- 4. 未經(jīng)權(quán)益所有人同意不得將文件中的內(nèi)容挪作商業(yè)或盈利用途。
- 5. 人人文庫網(wǎng)僅提供信息存儲空間,僅對用戶上傳內(nèi)容的表現(xiàn)方式做保護處理,對用戶上傳分享的文檔內(nèi)容本身不做任何修改或編輯,并不能對任何下載內(nèi)容負責(zé)。
- 6. 下載文件中如有侵權(quán)或不適當(dāng)內(nèi)容,請與我們聯(lián)系,我們立即糾正。
- 7. 本站不保證下載資源的準(zhǔn)確性、安全性和完整性, 同時也不承擔(dān)用戶因使用這些下載資源對自己和他人造成任何形式的傷害或損失。
最新文檔
- 大連商務(wù)職業(yè)學(xué)院《合唱與指揮A》2023-2024學(xué)年第二學(xué)期期末試卷
- 山西省長治市長子縣2025屆小升初數(shù)學(xué)高頻考點模擬卷含解析
- 中醫(yī)操作在社區(qū)中的運用
- 淤泥晾曬施工方案
- 家具商場物業(yè)工作總結(jié)
- 教育學(xué)試講模板幼兒園
- 工程項目管理分析報告
- 四川省衛(wèi)生類事業(yè)單位公開招聘(中藥專業(yè))近年考試真題庫及答案
- 工作總結(jié)數(shù)字量化
- 市場調(diào)研分析培訓(xùn)班
- 安徽省合肥市2025屆高三下學(xué)期3月二模試題 地理 含解析
- 2025年全國中醫(yī)醫(yī)師定期考核中醫(yī)專業(yè)理論知識考試題庫及答案(共五套)
- 湖北省部分名校2024-2025學(xué)年高二下學(xué)期3月聯(lián)考物理試卷(A)(原卷版+解析版)
- 第5課+光色交匯+課件-2024-2025學(xué)年浙人美版(2024)初中美術(shù)七年級下冊
- (2025)政工職稱考試題庫(附參考答案)
- 臨沂考科目一試題及答案
- 2025年初級等保測評試題及答案
- 2025年全國中小學(xué)生安全知識競賽參考試題庫500題(含答案)
- DB11∕T493.1-2024道路交通管理設(shè)施設(shè)置規(guī)范 第1部分:道路交通標(biāo)志
- 教師如何使用AI開展教學(xué)DeepSeek使用指南人工智能 課件
- 2025新人教版七年級下語文-4.16《有為有不為》教案教學(xué)設(shè)計
評論
0/150
提交評論