data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/da07e/da07e99bf2b638dde45be234bf3754662b49171b" alt="英文渴望好工作:公立學校的食品服務人員_第1頁"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/50bb9/50bb96ce7484cb15eb32c72366d690f1400170c9" alt="英文渴望好工作:公立學校的食品服務人員_第2頁"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/7ef31/7ef31ebbde4b595390f8593c58f13ed6fa88b1fc" alt="英文渴望好工作:公立學校的食品服務人員_第3頁"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f67a1/f67a1476dbfa149ee975ed7f29bd811e5ba25e04" alt="英文渴望好工作:公立學校的食品服務人員_第4頁"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6a852/6a8525530368ab61ad562c93733a53b9d3faa261" alt="英文渴望好工作:公立學校的食品服務人員_第5頁"
版權說明:本文檔由用戶提供并上傳,收益歸屬內容提供方,若內容存在侵權,請進行舉報或認領
文檔簡介
SEPTEMBER2024
HUNGRYFORGOODJOBS:
FOODSERVICEWORKERSIN
PUBLICSCHOOLS
SARAHINKLEY
AREPORTFROMTHEUCBERKELEYLABORCENTER
Acknowledgements
ManythankstoAidaFarmandattheUCBerkeleyLaborCenterformodelingthepublicprogram
participationoffoodserviceworkers.ThisreportbenefitedgreatlyfromthefeedbackofJenniferGaddisoftheUniversityofWisconsin(aswellasheryearsofworkinthisarea)andfromconversationswith
DebbieFriedmanandEvaRingstromwiththeFoodInsightGroupandCassieManciniwiththeCaliforniaSchoolEmployeesAssociation(CSEA).Anyerrorsremainmyown.
HungryforGoodJobs:FoodServiceWorkersinPublicSchools2
Summary
Thisreportprovidesanoverviewoftheworkingconditionsandcharacteristicsofpublicschoolfoodserviceworkers,incomparisontootherrelevantworkersinpublicschoolsandotherfoodservice
workers.Itisorganizedasfollows:
1.Policiesgoverningschoolmeals:Thebackgroundandfundingstructureofschoolmealprograms;
2.Thepublicschoolfoodserviceworkforce:Occupationalstructureofschoolfoodservicework;characteristics;
3.Incomeandeconomicwellbeing:Incomes,Accesstobenefits,familypoverty,andhouseholdincomes;
4.Differencesacrossstates:Variationsinworkingconditionsandcompensationbystate;
5.Outsourcingschoolmeals:Whatweknowaboutthedegreeofoutsourcinginschoolmealsandpossibleimpactsonthepublicschoolfoodserviceworkforce.
Wehopethisinformationisvaluabletopolicymakersandadministratorsseekingtounderstandhowtheworkingconditionsofthisworkforceaffectschools’abilitytostafftheirfoodserviceprograms,improvenutritionalstandards,andsupportfamily-sustainingjobs.
KeyFindings
?Thenumberofschoolfoodserviceworkershasdeclinedoverthepastdecade,althoughnotuniformlyacrossstates.Thisdeclinehasoccurreddespiteexpandedschoolmealprograms
supportedbypandemic-erafederalfunding.Thelong-lastingbudgetausteritysparkedby
theGreatRecession,decliningpublicschoolenrollment,adrop-offinmealconsumption,andincreasedoutsourcingcouldallbecontributingtoemploymentdecline.
?Overall,therehasbeenasteadydeclineinthenumberofschoollunchesservedoverthepasttwodecades,atrendthatresumedafterthedisruptionsofthepandemic(withtheexceptionofstatesthathavemaintainedfundingforuniversalmeals).
?Theadoptionof“scratchcooking”—preparingmealsfromscratchinsteadofpurchasingpre-mademeals—varieswidely,inpartbecauseofstaffshortages.Manyschoolslackthe
infrastructureandstafftomakescratchcookingareality,meaningthatimprovednutritionalstandardsmaybedifficulttoaccomplishunlessstaffingchallengesareresolved.
?Schoolfoodserviceworkersaresignificantlyolderthantheoverallworkforce(medianageof52comparedto28forotherfoodserviceworkers)andalmostentirelyfemale(93%).TheyaremorelikelytobeBlackorLatinothantheoverallworkforce.
?Themedianhourlywageforschoolfoodserviceworkersisjust$12.78andhasdeclinedslightly(inrealterms)since2008-12.Theyearnlessthanotherfoodserviceworkers($13.08),andwellbelowotherclassifiedworkers($16.98)andinstitutionalcafeteriaworkers($16.01).
HungryforGoodJobs:FoodServiceWorkersinPublicSchools3
?Schoolfoodserviceworkersaremorelikelytoworkparttimethanotherpublicschoolstaff
andworkersgenerally,whichaffectsboththeirannualincomeandtheireligibilityforhealthandretirementbenefits.Whilepart-timeseasonalworkmayappealtoasmallsubsetoftheseworkers,surveyssuggestthatmanywouldliketoworkmorehoursandbeabletoqualifyforbenefits.
?Schooldistrictshavestruggledtostaffschoolnutritionpositions,alongwithotherclassified
positionsandteachers.Anagingworkforcemeansthesehiringchallengeswillonlygetworse,especiallyifschoolfoodservicejobscontinuetolagbehindsimilarworkinofferingdecentpayandbenefits.
Definitions
Withinpublicschools,thebenefitsofpublicsectorworkaredistributedunevenlyamongdifferent
workers.Theworkforceisprimarilydividedintotwogroups:“certificated”workers(teachers,
psychologists,andschoolanddistrictadministrators)whohaveaspecificeducationalcertificate
orlicense,and“classified”workers,includingbusdrivers,janitors,specialeducationsupport,and
schoolnutrition.(Classifiedworkersmayhaveotherspecializedtrainingoreducation,suchasnurses,nutritionists,accountants,andconstructionworkers.)Certificatedworkerspredominantlyhavecollegedegrees,workfulltime,andaremuchmorelikelytobewhiteincomparisontotheoverallworkforce.Classifiedworkersaremuchmorelikelytobeparttimeandmuchlesslikelytobewhite.Forpart-timeworkers,accesstobenefitsmaybeoutofreachevenasapublicemployee,andtheinaccessibilityoffull-time,year-roundworkerodesmanyofthebenefitsthatotherpublicsectorworkersenjoy.
HungryforGoodJobs:FoodServiceWorkersinPublicSchools4
Introduction
LunchinthecafeteriahasbeenanintegralpartoftheU.S.schooldayforoveracentury.Thepoliciesthatshapepublicschoolmealprogramshavechangedsignificantlyoverthepastcentury,driven
bytrendsinnutrition,workertraining,publicfunding,theavailabilityofconveniencefoods,andthe
growthofglobalfoodservicecontractors,amongotherfactors.Whathasnotchangedisthatthe
vastmajorityofpeoplecookingandservingmealstostudentsarewomenearningsomeofthe
lowestwagesnotjustamongpublicsectorworkers,butacrossoccupationsandindustries.Foodservicejobsinpublicschoolshavethepotentialtoserveasanentryintopublicemploymentwithgoodbenefits,rewardingwork,andjobstability.Unfortunately,theseasonalandpart-timenatureofthis
work,anditspersistentlylowpay,meansthatmanyoftheseessentialworkerslackeconomicsecurityfortheirownhouseholds.
Today,nearlyallpublicschoolsofferlunch,andagrowingnumberofferabreakfastorsnack.The
availabilityofnutritiousmealshasbeenlinkedtomanypositivebenefitsforstudents,particularlyfor
themillionsofchildrenwhoarriveatschoolhungry.Federalfundingsubsidizesallorpartofthecostsforstudentsfromlow-incomehouseholds,andagrowingnumberofstateprogramsprovideadditionalfundingtoallowallstudentstoreceivemealsforfree(FoodResearch&ActionCenter2023).
Schoollunchprogramswereoriginallyorganizedbywomentoprovidefreeorlow-costmealsto
childrenfromimmigrantandpoorhouseholds,andtoensurethatstudentshadaccesstosafeand
nutritiousfood(J.E.Gaddis2019).Aswithmanyjobsthatare(orwereonce)primarilyperformed
bywomen—includingteaching,housecleaning,andchildcare—compensationandjobstructureisa
legacyoftheoutdatednotionthatwomen’swagesarenotvitaltohouseholdincome.Despitethefact
thatwomen’sincomesprovidevitalsupporttoamajorityofAmericanhouseholds,jobsperceivedas
“women’swork”continuetodrivethegenderwagegapacrosstheeconomy(SchiederandGould2016).Compoundingthis,foodserviceworkhasalwaysbeenparticularlyundervalued(Allegrettoetal.2013).
TheCOVID-19pandemicbroughtrenewedattentiontotheimportantrolethatschoolsplayinchildren’slivesoutsidetheclassroom,includingdailynutrition.Publicschoolsandtheirstaffdemonstratedtheir
capacitytoprovideaneffectivemealandnutritiondeliverysystemtostudentsandfamilieswhoneededhelptogetfoodwhileschoolswereclosed.Thepandemicsignificantlydisruptedschoolmealservices
andposedunprecedentedchallengesforfoodservicestaff.Manyschoolsshiftedtoalternatemodelsofgettingfoodtostudents(suchasbaggedmeals)oradaptedwaystoservetraditionalmealswhile
complyingwithpublichealthguidance.Districtsreceivedfederalfundingtoprovideuniversalfree
mealsfrommid-2020untilthe2022-23schoolyear,butrisingcostsleftmanycafeteriafundsdepleted.
Thepandemicalsorevealedtheprecariousnessofthestaffingsituation.Thisolderworkforcewas
typicallythefirsttoreturntoschoolbuildingsandinteractwithcoworkersandstudents,riskingtheir
healthlongbeforevaccineswereavailable(J.GaddisandRosenthal2020).Sincethepandemic,manydistrictshavefacedsignificantstaffingchallenges,alongwithintermittentfoodshortages,supplychainissues,andrisingcommodityprices(Lieberman2021).Thetightlabormarketofthepastfewyearshasmeantfewerpeoplearewillingtotakelow-wage,part-timework,includingschoolfoodserviceand
schoolbusdriving.Somedistrictshaveevenhiredstudentstoservemeals(Miranda2022).
HungryforGoodJobs:FoodServiceWorkersinPublicSchools5
Thesearenotchallengesthatdistrictscanresolveontheirown.Asmorestateselecttocoverthecostsofcontinuinguniversalfreemeals,policymakerswillneedtounderstandandaddressissuesofstaffing,infrastructure,andfiscalsustainability.Schoolshavemadeimportantprogressinservingmorechildrennutritiousandaffordablemeals,butunlesstheworkingconditionsofthepeoplepreparingandservingthosemealsareimproved,muchofthatprogressisatriskofbeingundone.
PreviousResearch
Thisreportbuildsonandupdatesarichbodyofresearchintotheworkingconditionsofpublicschoolfoodworkers.In2010theUCBerkeleyLaborCenterpublishedareportonthisworkforce—including
participationinpublicbenefitprogramsandthepossibleimpactsofanincreasedwagefloor—using
2008ACSdata(JacobsandGraham-Squire2010).In2022theCongressionalResearchService(CRS)
publishedacomprehensivereportonthepublicK-12foodserviceworkforceusingACS2015-2019
data(CongressionalResearchService2022).TheUnitedStatesDepartmentofAgriculture(USDA)has
recentlyfundedseveralresearchprojects(USDAFoodandNutritionService2024).TheSchoolNutrition
Association(SNA),aprofessionalmembershipassociationofschoolfoodservicedirectors,also
conductsregularsurveysoncompensation,benefits,andissuesfacingemployersoftheseworkersoncompensationandbenefits(SchoolNutritionAssociation2020).
WealsodrawonJenniferGaddis’richbodyofworkonthehistoryoftheschoolfoodserviceworkforceandtherelationshipofprivatecompaniestotheschoolmealprogram(J.GaddisandCoplen2018;J.E.Gaddis2019).Therehasalsobeenresearchonspecificlocalities:e.g.,NewJersey,Wisconsin(HealthySchoolMealsforAllandGaddis2023),andBaltimore(Gellesetal.2022).
Morerecentresearchhasfocusedonthechallengesposedbyvacanciesandstaffturnover,trendsthatarecompoundedbyworkingconditionswediscussinthisreport(delaCour2023;2022;Hickeyand
Cooper2022;Lieberman2021).TheFoodInsightGrouprecentlypublishedastudyonvacanciesandturnoveroffoodserviceworkersinCaliforniaschooldistrictsthatisvitalreadingforanyonestudyingthisworkforce(FoodInsightGroup2024).
DataandMethods
Toanalyzetheworkingconditionsandcharacteristicsofschoolfoodserviceworkers,weuseone-yearAmericanCommunitySurvey(ACS)samplesfromtwofive-yearperiods:2008-2012and2018-2022.Ourdemographicandwageanalysisusesfive-yearcombineddatatoensuresufficientsamplesizes,butweuseone-yeardatatolookatemploymenttrends.WealsoreferenceCurrentPopulationSurvey(CPS)
andOccupationalEmploymentStatistics(OEWS)dataforunionizationandoccupationcounts.
IdentifyingPublicSchoolFoodServiceWorkers
OuranalysisfocusesonthefoodserviceworkersdirectlyemployedbyK-12publicschooldistricts.
ToidentifytheseworkersinCensusdatasources,weselect“elementaryandsecondaryschools”as
industry(7860inthe2012CensusIndustrialClassificationSystem&NAICScode611100,asubsetofeducationalservices)andpublicsectoremployment.Wedonotincludeprivateelementary/secondary
HungryforGoodJobs:FoodServiceWorkersinPublicSchools6
schools,whicharenotrequiredtoparticipateinmealprograms,butcharterschoolsarereflectedinouruniverse.1WeusedthesameoccupationlistastheCongressionalResearchService(2022)intheiranalysis.
Thisuniverseexcludessomeworkerswhosupportdistrictfoodprogramsbutarenotidentifiable
assuchinthedata,forexample,cashiers,drivers,warehousemanagers,secretaries,andgeneral
administrators.Mostoftheseworkersperformmultiplefunctions,andsomemaybefundedinpartorwholebygeneralfundsratherthancafeteriafunds.Otherstudiesofschoolfoodserviceworkersusedistrictsurveystoidentifyallstaffsupportingfoodserviceprograms,leadingtolargerestimatesof
workforcesize.
Weexcludeself-employed,unemployed,andfamilyworkers.FollowingthemethodologyusedbytheCongressionalResearchService(2022),weexcludethosewhoworkedfewerthan5hoursaweekor27weeksinthepastyear;thatamountsto12.5%oftheworkforcein2018-22.Weadoptthisexclusion
toenablecomparisonwithpreviousresearchandtoexcludethosewithminimalattachmenttotheworkforce.(SeeMethodsandSourcesbelowformoredetailsonourdataandmethodology.)
ComparisonWorkerGroups
Wecomparethedemographicsandeconomicoutcomesofschoolfoodserviceworkerstoseveralothergroupsofworkers.Thesecomparisongroupsrepresentcomparablejobsinotherindustries,aswellas
otheroccupationsinpublicschools.Theyare:
?Otherclassifiedworkersinpublicschools(e.g.custodians,clerks,teacherassistants,healthassistants—excludingconstructionstaff);
?Certificatedworkersinpublicschools(teachers,librarians,counselors—excludingadministrators);2
?Otherfoodserviceworkers,i.e.,workersinthesamesetofoccupations,butemployedinthe
foodserviceindustry.Thisindustryincludesfoodservicecontractors(whomaybeservingpublicschooldistricts),butprimarilyincludesrestaurantsorotherprivateeatingestablishments;
?Otherinstitutionalcafeteriaworkers(e.g.,hospitalorgovernmentcafeterias);
?Allotherworkers,withthesameminimumhoursperweekandweeksperyear.
1Alittleunder9%ofU.S.K-12studentsattendedprivateschoolinfall2021,thelastyearforwhichthereisnationaldata.U.S.DepartmentofEducation,NationalCenterforEducationStatistics,PrivateSchoolUniverseSurvey(PSS),2011–12through2021–22.SeeDigestofEducationStatistics2023,table205.20.
2Certificatedreferstopositionsthatrequiresomeformofstatelicensingorcertification.
HungryforGoodJobs:FoodServiceWorkersinPublicSchools7
1.PoliciesGoverningSchoolFoodService
Stateandnationalpoliciesgoverningthefundingandstructuringofschoolmealprograms,aswellasminimumwagelawsandlaborprotections,affecttheworkingconditions,outsourcing,anddemandforschoolfoodserviceworkers.Stateandfederalpoliciesthatregulatefoodpurchasingandnutritional
requirementsfortheschoolmealprogramalsoaffecttherequiredskills,demandfor,andtrainingoffoodserviceworkers.
PublicschoolmealprogramsareoverseenbytheUnitedStatesDepartmentofAgriculture(USDA)andgovernedbytheRichardB.RussellNationalSchoolLunchActandtheChildNutritionAct(CNA)of
1966.ThemostrecentsignificantupdatetotheCNAwastheHealthy,Hunger-FreeKidsActof2010
(HHFKA),whichaddedtrainingrequirementsforstaff,fundingfortraining,additionalfundingformeals,andexpandedtheUSDA’sauthoritytosetnutritionstandards.
Schoolmealsarefundedprimarilythroughthefederalgovernment’sNationalSchoolLunchProgram
(NSLP)andSchoolBreakfastProgram(SBP).Mostofthatfundingisintheformofcashreimbursementspermealserved,withsomeadditionalfundingforpurchasingfederalfoodcommoditiesandpayingforadministrationcosts.WithinthecontiguousUnitedStates,theper-mealreimbursementratesdonot
varybyplace,3despitesignificantdifferencesinlaborandsupplycostsbetweenregions(J.E.Gaddis2020).
Therearethreereimbursementratesformeals,basedonstudents’incomeeligibility:free,
reduced-price,andfull-price.TheNSLPper-mealreimbursementsforthe2023-24schoolyearrange
from$0.40(forpaidlunch)to$4.50(forfreelunch).4Inadditiontothesereimbursements,districts
receivemoneyfromthestudentfeesforfull-andreduced-pricemeals,andstudentpurchasesofextraslikechips,cookies,anddrinks.A2019studyreportedthat57%ofschoolfoodservicerevenuesare
fromfederalreimbursements,20%fromstudentmealpayments,6%fromstateandlocalfunds,6%
fromdiscountedUSDAcommodities,and11%fromsalesofsnackitems(UnitedStatesDepartment
ofAgricultureandMathematicaPolicyResearch2019).Districtsalsoreceivesupportforbuyingsomefoods:theUSDApurchasescommoditiesanddistributesthemtofederalnutritionassistanceprogramsthatinturndistributethematlowornocosttoschoolmealprograms.Thereisastatecost-matchingrequirement,andsomestateselecttoprovideadditionalfundingtodistrictfoodprogramsona
per-mealbasis(CodeofFederalRegulations2023).Asofthiswriting,8stateshaveauthorizedfundingforuniversalfreemealsforallstudents(coveringthedifferencebetweentheUSDAreimbursementandactualdistrictcosts)—California,Colorado,Maine,Massachusetts,Michigan,Minnesota,NewMexico,
andVermont(FoodResearch&ActionCenter2023).Districtsalsoindirectlysubsidizeschoolmeal
programswithgeneralfunds,bypayingfortheadministrativeoverheadandoccasionalworkofstaffwhohaveotherduties,suchasfacilitiesandmaintenancestaffandfinancialclerks.
Tounderstandthefinancialincentivesdistrictsfacewhenmanagingfoodserviceprograms,itis
importanttonotethatfederalreimbursementsalonedonotcovertheactualcostofprovidingmeals.
A2019studybyUSDAfoundthattheaveragecostofproducingalunchwasbetween$0.49and$2.70morepermealthanthereimbursementrate,dependingonwhetheradministrativeoverheadisfactoredin(BillingsandCongressionalResearchService2023,21).
3AlaskaandHawaiihavehigherreimbursementrates.4
/cn/rates-reimbursement
HungryforGoodJobs:FoodServiceWorkersinPublicSchools8
Therearesomerestrictionsonhowfederalfundsarespent,butingeneralitisuptodistrictsto
distributefundsbetweenlaborandsupplycosts,whichcanputpressureonwageswhenfoodcostsgoup(ashappeneddramaticallyduringtherecentyearsofhighinflationandsupplyshortages),orforcedistrictstochoosebetweenfoodqualityandstaffingcosts.Federalcashreimbursementsmustgointoafundseparatefromadistrict’sgeneralfund,somostdistrictsuseacafeteriafundformealprograms.Thisaccountingstructurealignswiththecommonexpectationbydistrictleadershipandthepublicthatadistrict’sfoodprogrambeself-sufficientandnotdrawinggeneralfundsawayfromcoreeducationalservices.
Becauseschoolscansettheirownmealpricesandfederalreimbursementratesdonotcovertheactualcostofservingmeals,andbecausetherearesignificanteconomiesofscaleinfoodservice,financial
sustainabilitydependssignificantlyonthenumberofstudentseatingmeals.Laborandadministrationcosts,aswellasinvestmentsincookingequipmenttopreparefreshmeals,aremorecost-effective
whenspreadoveralargevolumeofmeals.Forthesamereasons,schoolmealcontractsaremorelucrativeinlargeurbandistrictswithhighlevelsoffree/reducedlunchparticipation.
TheUSDAalsoprovidesfundsforbreakfast,summer,andafter-schoolmeals,whichcanexpandthe
needforfull-dayandyear-roundworkers.SignificantlyfewerschoolsparticipateintheSchoolBreakfastProgramthanthelunchprogram.Summerfoodprogramsareprimarilylimitedtoruralareasorareas
withhighpercentagesoflow-incomechildren;after-schoolsnacksandmealsarefundedinareaswhereatleast50%ofthestudentsareeligibleforfreeorreduced-pricemeals.
ProgramParticipation
Thenumberofmealsservedinpublicschoolshasdeclinedsignificantlysince2008,ashastheshare
ofstudentspayingfullprice,bothofwhichputfiscalstrainonmealprograms.Withmanyschools
closedin2020and2021,thenumberofmealsserveddroppedprecipitously.In2022—likelybecauseofcontinueduniversalfreemeals—thatnumberrecoveredtopre-pandemiclevels,onlytodeclineagain
in2023(BillingsandCongressionalResearchService2023).Overthatsametimeperiod—2008-2022—publicschoolenrollmentgrewby1%.
ImpactsoftheCOVID-19Pandemic
Duringthe2020-21and2021-22schoolyears,schoolswerereimbursedforfreemealstoallstudentsregardlessofincomeeligibilityandwerealsoallowedtoofferpickupanddeliveryofmealswhile
schoolswereclosed(normally,schoolfoodmustbeeatenoncampus).Duringthisperiod,schools
servedasoneofthemostefficientwaystogetfoodtopeoplethatneededit;manydistrictsoperated(andsomecontinuetooperate)householdfooddistributioninadditiontoservingmealsinschool
facilities.
Despitethetemporaryinfluxoffederalfunding,districtcafeteriafundsoftendeclinedduring
thepandemic.Costsfromtheprovisionofuniversalfreemealsthatwerenotcoveredbyfederal
reimbursements,theinabilitytosellrevenue-boostingsnacks,risingfoodprices,andsupplychain
issuesalldrovemanydistrictstospenddowncafeteriafundreservesandevendrawongeneralfunds.
HungryforGoodJobs:FoodServiceWorkersinPublicSchools9
Figure1.Schoollunchtrends(2008-2023)
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
TotalLunchesServed(millions)
AverageStudent
Participation(millions)
PercentFreeorReducedPrice
5,208
31
60.1
5,186
31.3
62.6
5,278
31.8
65.3
5,274
31.8
66.6
5,215
31.7
68.2
4,866
29.7
74.4
4,867
29.6
74.1
3,210
22.4
76.9
2,155
11
98.9
4,952
4,644
30.1
95.4
28.5
70.8
Chart:SaraHinkley,UCBerkeleyLaborCenter?Source:NationalSchoolLunchProgramAnnualSummaryTables?CreatedwithDatawrapper
Whenthefederalsupportforuniversalfreemealsexpired,severalstatespickeditup;asofJune2024,California,Colorado,Maine,Massachusetts,Michigan,Minnesota,NewMexico,andVermontofferfreemealstoallstudents(coveringthegapbetweencostandfederalreimbursement).Itistooearlyyettodiscerntheeffectofthesestatepoliciesonemploymenttrendsinthosestates.
NutritionalStandardsandStaffing
Thetypeofmealsbeingpreparedandserved—andhowthatworkisdistributedacrossasupply
chain—alsodrivesthesizeandstructureofthefoodserviceworkforce.Theexpandednutritional
standardsadoptedin2010werepartofapolicytrendtowardmore“scratch”preparationofmeals,inanefforttoreducerelianceonpre-preparedheat-and-servemeals(J.GaddisandCoplen2018).This
shiftrequiresmorestaff,aswellasadditionaltrainingandequipment.Districts’accesstofundingfor
suchinfrastructurevarieswidely;onestudyhasfoundthatmanydistrictslackadequateinfrastructuretomakethisshift(CenterforCities+SchoolsandConsciousKitchen2020).
Staffingshortagesalsolimitdistricts’abilitytoprepareandservefreshfood,whichinturnmayreduce
studentparticipation,cuttingintoprogramrevenuesandmakingscratchcookingmoredifficultto
accomplish.Investmentsinscratch-cookingequipmentandfreshingredientsarenotenoughtosupportthisimportantnutritionalgoal—theremustalsobeinvestmentsinstaffdevelopmentandretention.Formanydistricts,staffingchallengesposeasignificantobstacletoservingfreshfood(FoodInsightGroup2024).
HungryforGoodJobs:FoodServiceWorkersinPublicSchools10
2.ThePublicSchoolFoodServiceWorkforce
Thepublicschoolfoodserviceworkforcehasbeenshrinkingsteadilysince2008;in2022,therewere
208,266suchworkersaccordingtoACSdata,a22%declinefrom268,206in2008(Figure2).Wenote
thatestimatesoftheworkforcesizevarybypublicdatasource,makingitchallengingtocompare
availablestudies.TheUCBerkeleyLaborCenter2010reportcitesanestimateof420,000workersin
K12schools—350,000publicand70,000workingforprivatecontractors(JacobsandGraham-Squire
2010).TheCRS2022reportestimatesthattherewere339,000workersinfoodserviceoperationsin
elementaryandsecondaryschools,includingbothpublicandprivatesector(theyuseACSdatafrom
2015-2019).OccupationEmploymentandWageStatistics(OEWS)datashows396,480suchworkersin2009(2008isnotavailable)and312,890in2022,butOEWSincludesalljobs(whileACSreportsonlyaworker’sprimaryjob)andincludesworkersbelowourminimumthresholdforhoursandweeksworked.CurrentPopulationStudiesOutgoingRotationGroups(CPSORG)estimates298,873in2008-12and
246,164in2018-22;CPSsamplesizesaremuchsmallerthanACS.
WorkforceSizeandEmploymentTrends
Regardlessofthesedifferences,alldatasourcesconfirmasignificantdeclineinthesizeoftheworkforce:CPSORGshowsadeclineof18%,OEWS24%.Severalfactorscouldbecontributingtothisdecline:
Figure2.Publicschoolfoodserviceemployment
2008271,337
2009252,845
2010245,800
2011241,789
2012235,682
2018232,515
溫馨提示
- 1. 本站所有資源如無特殊說明,都需要本地電腦安裝OFFICE2007和PDF閱讀器。圖紙軟件為CAD,CAXA,PROE,UG,SolidWorks等.壓縮文件請下載最新的WinRAR軟件解壓。
- 2. 本站的文檔不包含任何第三方提供的附件圖紙等,如果需要附件,請聯系上傳者。文件的所有權益歸上傳用戶所有。
- 3. 本站RAR壓縮包中若帶圖紙,網頁內容里面會有圖紙預覽,若沒有圖紙預覽就沒有圖紙。
- 4. 未經權益所有人同意不得將文件中的內容挪作商業(yè)或盈利用途。
- 5. 人人文庫網僅提供信息存儲空間,僅對用戶上傳內容的表現方式做保護處理,對用戶上傳分享的文檔內容本身不做任何修改或編輯,并不能對任何下載內容負責。
- 6. 下載文件中如有侵權或不適當內容,請與我們聯系,我們立即糾正。
- 7. 本站不保證下載資源的準確性、安全性和完整性, 同時也不承擔用戶因使用這些下載資源對自己和他人造成任何形式的傷害或損失。
最新文檔
- JJF 2199-2025數字式時鐘校準規(guī)范
- 前期策劃合同范本
- 養(yǎng)牛設備出售合同范本
- 保障性住房購房合同范本
- 加油卡租車合同范本
- 協議單位優(yōu)惠合同范例
- 醫(yī)藥物流合同范本
- 修叉車合同范本
- 勞務分包協議合同范本
- 勞務合同范本已填
- 脫硫自動化控制-洞察分析
- 醫(yī)務人員醫(yī)德醫(yī)風培訓
- 人教版初中歷史八上-第2課 第二次鴉片戰(zhàn)爭
- 2024湖北省金口電排站管理處招聘易考易錯模擬試題(共500題)試卷后附參考答案
- 油井供水合同范例
- 2025年人教部編版語文五年級下冊教學計劃(含進度表)
- 全國計算機等級考試一級試題及答案(5套)
- 銀河證券-科創(chuàng)板認知測評題目及答案
- 產品方案設計模板
- 部隊通訊員培訓
- 物業(yè)公司水浸、水管爆裂事故應急處置預案
評論
0/150
提交評論