金融學(xué)（第四版）課件：Regulation of the Banking System and the Financial Services Industry_第1頁
金融學(xué)（第四版）課件：Regulation of the Banking System and the Financial Services Industry_第2頁
金融學(xué)（第四版）課件：Regulation of the Banking System and the Financial Services Industry_第3頁
金融學(xué)（第四版）課件：Regulation of the Banking System and the Financial Services Industry_第4頁
金融學(xué)（第四版）課件：Regulation of the Banking System and the Financial Services Industry_第5頁
已閱讀5頁，還剩35頁未讀， 繼續(xù)免費(fèi)閱讀

下載本文檔

版權(quán)說明：本文檔由用戶提供并上傳，收益歸屬內(nèi)容提供方，若內(nèi)容存在侵權(quán)，請進(jìn)行舉報(bào)或認(rèn)領(lǐng)

文檔簡介

RegulationoftheBankingSystemandtheFinancialServicesIndustry

2RegulationinBankingTheGlass-SteagallActmadethebankingsectorahighlyregulatedindustryBythe1970s,manybelievedthattheeconomywasoverregulatedledtoaderegulationmovementinmanyindustriesAfterderegulation,someindustriesexperiencedseverestressesandfailuressomeblamedderegulation3RegulationinBankingBythelate1990s,bankshadrecoveredfrompreviousdifficultiesandmaderecordprofitsTheearly2000sprovedtobeamoredifficulttime,butby2004bankshadreboundedfromanydifficulties4WhyRegulate?TherearetwoobjectivesofregulationcompetitionefficiencyThesetwoobjectivesmaybeatoddswithoneanother“freetocompete”“freetofail”5WhyRegulate?Regulationsweredeemednecessarybecausethetrade-offbetweenhighreturnsfornetlendersversussafetyandsoundnessFIsearnhigherreturnsbyassumingmorerisksintheprocessofassessingtheexpectedcostsassociatedwiththeincreasedrisk,theFIwillconsideronlythecoststostockholders,creditors,anddepositorsmayignoreimpactsoneconomyatlarge6EffectsofRegulationRegulationsencouragedspecializationlimitationsonportfolioscompartmentalizedFIsintospecialtiesinsurancecompanieswouldspecializeininsurancebankswouldspecializeinbankingtheselimitationshavefallenandFIshavemovedacrossspecializations1999legislationallowedfullintegrationofbanking,securities,andinsurancefirms7EffectsofRegulationRegulationscanfocusonfinancialproductsorfinancialinstitutionsstocksbonds,andfuturesareregulatedbanks,S&Ls,andinsurancecompaniesareregulatedTheseproductsandinstitutionscanberegulatedbymorethanoneagency8CurrentRegulatoryStructureTheregulatorystructureofthefinancialservicesindustryisinaprocessofongoingchangetheongoingevolutionoftheindustryresultsinnewproductsandservices,technologicalchangesinthedeliveryofservices,andtheglobalizationoffinancialmarketschangesinthesystemalwaysleadtoconcernsabouttheadequacyofregulation9DeregulationintheEarly1980sBanksadaptedtoregulationbydevelopingnewtypesofliabilitiesandcreatingholdingcompaniesAstheseinnovationsweakenedtheeffectivenessofregulations,Congressdecidedtoderegulatethefinancialservicesindustrylandmarklegislationoccurredin1980andagainin198210DeregulationintheEarly1980sDepositoryInstitutionsActandMonetaryControlActof1980(DIDMCA)deregulationRegulationQceilingswerephasedoutassetandliabilitypowersofbanksandthriftswereexpandedmonetarycontrolalldepositoryinstitutionsweresubjecttoreserverequirementsreserverequirementsweretobethesameonparticulardepositsacrossinstitutions11DeregulationintheEarly1980sDepositoryInstitutionsActandMonetaryControlActof1980(DIDMCA)putsomeexplicitpricecompetitionbackintobankingandpermittedcompetitionamongFIsstrengthenedtheeffectivenessoftheregulatoryprocessandexpandedthepowersoftheFed12DeregulationintheEarly1980sGarn-St.GermainDepositoryInstitutionsActof1982

alloweddepositoryinstitutionstooffertwotypesofdepositaccountsdesignedtocompetedirectlywithmoneymarketmutualfundsmoneymarketdepositaccountssuperNOWaccountsthishasledtocompetitionamongandbetweenFIs13InternationalCapitalStandardsUntil1980,bankswerefreetoestablishtheirowncapitalrequirementsIntheearly1980s,regulatorsswitchedtheirfocustostrictercapitalrequirements14InternationalCapitalStandardsIn1988,theU.S.and11othercountriesenteredintotheBaselAccordestablisheduniforminternationalcapitalstandardsforbanksspecifiedtheamountofcapitalthatbanksmustholdrelativetoassets15InternationalCapitalStandardsThestandardwasstricterthanthatimposedonU.S.banksatthetimeandinvolvedrisk-basedcapitalstandardstheamountofcapitalabankwasrequiredtoholdwasbasedonthemeasurableriskinessofitsassetsrelativetoitsliabilitiesmanybankshadtoaltertheirbehaviorasaresultofthisnewstandard16RegulationinResponsetoFinancialCrisisTheFinancialInstitutionsReform,Recovery,andEnforcementAct(FIRREA)wassignedintolawin1989passedinresponsetotheS&Lcrisisofthe1980swasanattempttoincreaseregulationafterthederegulationoftheearly1980s17RegulationinResponsetoFinancialCrisisFinancialInstitutionsReform,Recovery,andEnforcementAct(FIRREA)createdtheSavingsAssociationInsuranceFund(SAIF)whichreplacedFSLICcreatedtheOfficeofThriftSupervision(replacedtheFederalHomeLoanBankBoard)andtheResolutionTrustCorporation(temporary)depositinsurancewasmadeafullfaithandcreditobligationofthefederalgovernment18RegulationinResponsetoFinancialCrisisFinancialInstitutionsReform,Recovery,andEnforcementAct(FIRREA)restrictedtheinvestmentsofS&LsbylimitingcommercialmortgagelendingandphasingoutjunkbondinvestmentsimposedcapitalrequirementsonS&Ls19TighteningUpDepositInsuranceDepositinsuranceleadstomorerisktakingmoralhazardproblemiftheFIlosesfundswhentakinggreaterrisks,thedepositorswillstillgettheirfundsbackCongressrespondedtothisproblembypassingtheFederalDepositInsuranceCorporationImprovementAct(FDICIA)in199120TighteningUpDepositInsuranceFederalDepositInsuranceCorporationImprovementAct(FDICIA)scaledtheinsurancepremiumstotheriskexposureofthebankorthriftlimitedcoverageofregularaccountsto$100,000requiredtheFDICtousetheleastcostlymethodofresolvinganyinsolvencymustcomparethecostsofthepayoffmethodwiththoseofthepurchaseandassumptionmethod21TighteningUpDepositInsuranceFederalDepositInsuranceCorporationImprovementAct(FDICIA)establishedasystemthatratedbanksandthriftsaswell-capitalized,adequatelycapitalized,andundercapitalizedlimitedtheabilityofforeignbankstousecertaincategoriesofdepositsintheU.S.22OutlawingDiscriminatoryLendingPracticesTheoriginalpurposeoftheCommunityReinvestmentActwastwofoldincreasetheavailabilityofcredittoeconomicallydisadvantagedareascorrectallegeddiscriminatorylendingpracticesTheActdidnotgetmuchattentionbecauseitfailedtoprovideameansofenforcementforregulatorstouse23OutlawingDiscriminatoryLendingPracticesBankmergershaveprovidedthatmeansofenforcementindecidingwhetherornottoapproveamerger,thefedassesshowwellthebankismeetingthelendingcriteriaoftheActIn1995,CRAregulationswererevisedmadethemmoreobjectiveandperformance-orientedreducedthecomplianceandreportingcostsforbanks24NationwideBranchingTheInterstateBankingandBranchingEfficiencyAct(IBBEA)of1994eliminatedmostrestrictionsoninterstatebankmergersmadeinterstatebranchingpossibleforthefirsttimesince1927asofJune1997,bankholdingcompanieswereallowedtoconvertmultiplebanksinvariousstatestobranchesofasingleinterstatebank25TheFinalDemiseofGlass-SteagallTheGramm-Leach-BlileyAct(GLBA)waspassedin1999allowscertainbankholdingcompaniestobecertifiedasfinancialholdingcompaniescanengageinabroadarrayoffinancialandnonfinancialactivitiessecuritiesunderwritinganddealing,insuranceagencyandunderwriting,andmerchantbankingotherfinancialactivitiesnonfinancialactivitiesthatarecomplementarytoafinancialactivity26TheFinalDemiseofGlass-SteagallGLBAalsoexpandedpowersofbanksauthorizedtounderwriteandmarketmunicipalrevenuebondsauthorizedtoownorcontrola“financialsubsidiary”ifpriorapprovaloftheOfficeoftheControlleroftheCurrencyisreceivedTheFedwasgiventheultimateresponsibilityforsupervisingfinancialholdingcompanies27TheFinalDemiseofGlass-SteagallTherearetwonewprovisionstotheActtoprotectconsumersATMoperatorsmustpostfeesthatmaybeimposedthereareanumberofnewrequirementsrelatingtothedisclosureoffinancialinformationaboutconsumers28OtherPossibleAreasofReformCriticsremainconcernedaboutthemoralhazardproblemassociatedwithdepositinsurancecouldprivatizedepositinsurancecouldcaporlimitdepositinsurancelowerthe$100,000maximumlimitsystem-widecoverageforanindividualto$100,000makedepositinsuranceoptionalfordepositors29OtherPossibleAreasofReformSomeindividualshavesuggestedconsolidatingandstreamliningtheregulatoryagenciesthepresentsystemcausesduplicationofregulatoryfunctionsandbureaucraticdelaysthepresentsystemiscostlyanddiminishestheeffectivenessandefficiencyofbanksupervision30SummaryofMajorPointsBecausethefailureofadepositoryinstitutionhassystemwiderepercussions,Congresshasenactedlegislationtoregulatethefinancialservicesindustrywiththegoalofavertingsuchafailureasegmentedfinancialservicesindustryresultedinasegmentedregulatorystructure31SummaryofMajorPointsRegulationisbyinstitutionoffinancialproductalldepositoryinstitutionsareregulatedbytheFedwithregardtoreserverequirementsTheFDICalsoregulatedbanksandthriftsthatoptforfederaldepositinsurancemanyotherregulatoryagenciesregulatespecificinstitutionsagenciesalsoregulatespecificfinancialproducts32SummaryofMajorPointsTheDepositoryInstitutionsDeregulationandMonetaryControlActof1980phasedoutRegulationQinterestrateceilingsexpandedtheassetandliabilityoptionsforbanksandthriftsalsoexpandedthepowersoftheFedbyauthorizinguniformanduniversalreserverequirements33SummaryofMajorPointsTheGarn-St.GermainDepositoryInstitutionsActof1982allowedalldepositoryinstitutionstooffermoneymarketdepositaccountsandSuperNOWaccounts34SummaryofMajorPointsTheBaselAccord,anagreementamong12countries,setsuniformcapitalrequirementsforfinancialinstitutionsasaprimaryvehicleofregulationrequirementsarebasedonrisk-adjustedassetsandliabilities35SummaryofMajorPointsTheFinancialInstitutionsReform,Recovery,andEnforcementActof1989attemptedtoresolvetheS&LcrisiscreatedtheOTScreatednewregulationsontheinvestmentsS&LscouldmakeimposedcapitalstandardsonS&Lsmadedepositinsuranceafullfaithandcreditobligationofthefederalgovernment36SummaryofMajorPointsTheFederalDepositInsuranceCorporationImprovementActof1991requiredhigherdepositinsurancepremiumsforbanksorthriftsthatundertakehighlevelsofrisktheFDICwasrequiredto

溫馨提示

  • 1. 本站所有資源如無特殊說明，都需要本地電腦安裝OFFICE2007和PDF閱讀器。圖紙軟件為CAD,CAXA,PROE,UG,SolidWorks等.壓縮文件請下載最新的WinRAR軟件解壓。
  • 2. 本站的文檔不包含任何第三方提供的附件圖紙等，如果需要附件，請聯(lián)系上傳者。文件的所有權(quán)益歸上傳用戶所有。
  • 3. 本站RAR壓縮包中若帶圖紙，網(wǎng)頁內(nèi)容里面會(huì)有圖紙預(yù)覽，若沒有圖紙預(yù)覽就沒有圖紙。
  • 4. 未經(jīng)權(quán)益所有人同意不得將文件中的內(nèi)容挪作商業(yè)或盈利用途。
  • 5. 人人文庫網(wǎng)僅提供信息存儲(chǔ)空間，僅對(duì)用戶上傳內(nèi)容的表現(xiàn)方式做保護(hù)處理，對(duì)用戶上傳分享的文檔內(nèi)容本身不做任何修改或編輯，并不能對(duì)任何下載內(nèi)容負(fù)責(zé)。
  • 6. 下載文件中如有侵權(quán)或不適當(dāng)內(nèi)容，請與我們聯(lián)系，我們立即糾正。
  • 7. 本站不保證下載資源的準(zhǔn)確性、安全性和完整性, 同時(shí)也不承擔(dān)用戶因使用這些下載資源對(duì)自己和他人造成任何形式的傷害或損失。

評(píng)論

0/150

提交評(píng)論