英語六級長篇閱讀真題5_第1頁
英語六級長篇閱讀真題5_第2頁
英語六級長篇閱讀真題5_第3頁
英語六級長篇閱讀真題5_第4頁
英語六級長篇閱讀真題5_第5頁
已閱讀5頁,還剩4頁未讀, 繼續(xù)免費閱讀

下載本文檔

版權(quán)說明:本文檔由用戶提供并上傳,收益歸屬內(nèi)容提供方,若內(nèi)容存在侵權(quán),請進(jìn)行舉報或認(rèn)領(lǐng)

文檔簡介

英語六級長篇閱讀真題-5

因考試政策、內(nèi)容不斷變化與調(diào)整,下面給大家整理的六

級閱讀理解真題供參考,以下是WTT給大家整理的英語六級長

篇閱讀真題-5,希望可以幫到大家

Datasharing:anopenmindonopendate

[A]Itisamovementbuildingsteadymomentum:a

calltomakeresearchdata,softwarecodeand

experimentalmethodspubliclyavailableand

transparent,aspiritofopennessisgaining

acceptanceinthesciencemunity,andistheonlyway,

sayadvocates,toaddressa*crisis*inciencewhereby

toofewfindingsaresuccessfullyreproduced,

furthermore,theysay,itisthebestwayfor

researcherstogathertherangeofobservationsthat

arenecessarytospeedupdiscoveriesortoidentify

large-scaletrends.

[B]theopen-datashiftposesaconfusingproblem

forjuniorresearchers,ontheonehand,thedriveto

shareisgatheringofficialsteam,since2022,global

scientificbodieshavebeguntobackpoliticsthat

supportincreasedpublicaccesstoreseach,onthe

otherhand,scientistsdisagreeabouthowmuchandwhen

theyshouldsharedate,andtheydebatewhethersharing

itismorelikelytoacceleratescienceandmakeit

morerobust,ortointroducevulnerabilitiesand

problems,asmorejournalsandmakeitmorerobust,or

tointroducevulnerabilitiesandproblems,asmore

journalandfundersadoptdata-sharingrequirements,

andasagrowingnumberofenthusiastscallformore

openness,juniorresearchersmustfindtheirplace

betweenadoptersandthosewhocontinuetoholdout,

evenastheystrivetolaunchtheirowncareers.

[C]onekeychallengefacingyoungscientistsis

howtobeopenwithoutbeingscientificallyvulnerable,

theymustdeterminetheriskofjeopardizingajob

offeroracollaborationprosalfromthosewhoare

waryof-orunfamiliarwith-openscience.andthey

mustlearnHowtocapitalizeonthemovement's

benefitssuchasopportunitiesformorecitationsand

awaytobuildareputationwithouttheneedfor

conventionalmetrics,suchaspublicationinhigh-

impactjournals.

[D]somefieldshaveembracedopendatamorethan

others,researchersinpsychology,afieldrockedby

findingsofirreproducibilityinthepastfewyears,

havebeenespeciallyvocalsup-portersofthedrive

formore-openscience.Afewpsychologyjournalshave

createdincentivestoincreaseinterestinreparopen

science*afewpsychologyjournalshavecreated

incentivesportersofthedriveformeluciblescience

-forexle,byaffixingana,badgetoarticlesthat

clearlystatewheredataareavailable,accordingto

socialpsychologistbriannoseexecutivedirectorof

thecenterforopenscience,theaveragedata-sharing

rateforthejournalPsychologicalscience,whichuses

thebadges,increasedtenfoldto38%from2022to2022.

[E]funders,too,areincreasinglyadoptingan

open-datapolicy.severalstronglyergement,andsome

require,adate-managementplanthatmakesdata

available.Theusnationalsciencefoundationisamong

these,somephilanthropic(慈善的)funders,including

thebillGatesfoundationinseattie,Washington,and

thewelletrustinlondon,alopendatafromtheir

grantrecipients.

[F]butmanyyoungresearchers,especiallythose

whohavenotbeenmentoredinopenscience.are

uncertainaboutwhethertoshareortostay

private.Graduatestudentsandpostdoes,whooftenare

workingontheirlabhead'sgrantmayhavenochoice

iftheirsupervisororanothersenioropposessharing*

[G]somefearthatthepotentialimpactofsharing

istoohigh,especiallyattheearlystagesofa

career.wEverybodyhasascarystoryaboutsomeone

gettingscooped(被搶先),"saysnewYorkuniversity

astronomerdavidhogg.thosefearsmaybeafactorin

alingeringhesitationtosharedataevenwhen

publishinginjournalsthatmandateit.

[H]researchersatsmalllabsoratinstitutions

focusedonteachingarguablyhavethemosttolose

whensharinghard-wondata.withmyinstitution

andteachingload,idon*thavepostdocsandgrad

students”,saysterrymcglynn,atropicalbiologist

atCaliforniastateuniversity,Dominguezhills."the

stakesarehighertosharedatabecauseit'sabigger

fractionofhatshappeninginmylab.

[I]researchersalsopointtothetimesinkthat

isinvolvedinpreparingdataforotherstoview.Once

thedataandassociatedmaterialsappearina

repository(存儲庫),answeringquestionsandhandling

plaintscantakemanyhours.

[J]thetimeinvestmentcanpresentotherproblems4

insomecases,saysdatascientistkarthikRam,itmay

bedifficultforjuniorresearcherstoembrace

opennesswhenseniorcolleaguesmanyofwhomhead

selectionandpromotionteeshtridiculewhattheymay

viewasmisplacedenergies,"i'veheardthisrecently

-thatembracingtheideaofopendatadcodemakes

traditionalacademicsunfortable,“saysram."the

concernseemstobethatopenadvocatesdon'tspend

theirtimebeingasproductiveaspossible.”

[K]anopen-sciencestancecanalsoaddplexityto

acollaboration,kateratliff,whostudiessocial

attitudesattheuniversityofflorida,gainesville,

saysthatitcanseemasiftherearetwocsina

field-thosewhocareaboutopenscienceandthosewho

don*t."thereanewareatonavigate-1areyoucool

withthefactthati'llwanttomakethedataopen?’-

whentalkingwithsomebodyaboutaninteresting

researchidea,“shesays,

[L]despiteplicationsandconcerns,theupsides

ofsharingcanbesignificant,forexle,when

informationisuploadedtoarepository,adigital

objectidentifier(DOI)isassigned.

ScientistscanuseaDOTtopublisheachstepof

theresearchlifecycle,notjustthefinalpaper.In

sodoing,theycanpotentiallygetthreecitations-

oneeachforthedataandsoftware,inadditiontothe

paperitself,andalthoughsomesaythatcitationsfor

softwareordatahavelittlecurrencyinacademia,they

canhaveotherbenefits.

[M]manyadvocatesthinkthattransparentdata

procedureswithadateandtimestwillprotect

scientistsfrombeingscooped,“thisisthesweet

spotbetweensharingandgettingcreditforit.while

discouragingplagiarism(剽竊),"saysivogrigorov,a

projectcoordinatoratthenaionalinstituteof

aquaticresot

Researchsecreta-incharlottenlund,denmark.

hoggsaysthatscoopingislessofaproblemthanmany

think,“thetwocasesi'mfamiliarwithdidn't

involveopendataorcode,“hesays.

[N]Opensciencealsooffersjuniorresearchers

thechancetolevelthepalyingfieldbygaining

betteraccesstocrucialdate,rossmounce,apostdoc

studyingevolutionarybiologyattheuniversityof

cambrige,UK,isavocalchionofopenscience,partly

becausehisfossilothers*data,hesaysthatmore

opennessinsciencecouldhelptodiscouragewhatsome

perceiveasamompracticeofshuttingoutearly-

careerscientists1requestsfordata.

[0]municationalsohelpsforthosewhoworry

aboutjeopardizingacollaboration,hesays,Concerns

aboutopenshouldbediscussedattheoutsetofa

study,“wheneveryoustartaprojectwithsomeone,

youhavetoestablishaclearunderstandingof

expectationsforwhoownsthedata,atwhatpointthey

gopublicandwhocandowhatwiththem,hesays.

[p]intheend,sharingdata,softwareand

materialswithcolleaguescanhelpanearly-career

researchertogainrecognition-acrucialponentof

success,“thethingyouaresearchingfor

reputation“saystitusbrown,agenomics(基因組學(xué))

researcherattheuniversityofCalifornia,davis,.”to

getgrantsandjobsyouhavetoberelevantand

achievesomelevelofpublicrecognition,anythingyou

dothatadvancesyourpresence-especiallyinalarger

phere,outsidethemunitiesyouknow-isawin.&;

36.astronomerdavidhoggdoesn'tthinkscooping

isasseriousaproblemasgenerallythought.

37.someresearchersarehesitanttomaketheir

datapu

溫馨提示

  • 1. 本站所有資源如無特殊說明,都需要本地電腦安裝OFFICE2007和PDF閱讀器。圖紙軟件為CAD,CAXA,PROE,UG,SolidWorks等.壓縮文件請下載最新的WinRAR軟件解壓。
  • 2. 本站的文檔不包含任何第三方提供的附件圖紙等,如果需要附件,請聯(lián)系上傳者。文件的所有權(quán)益歸上傳用戶所有。
  • 3. 本站RAR壓縮包中若帶圖紙,網(wǎng)頁內(nèi)容里面會有圖紙預(yù)覽,若沒有圖紙預(yù)覽就沒有圖紙。
  • 4. 未經(jīng)權(quán)益所有人同意不得將文件中的內(nèi)容挪作商業(yè)或盈利用途。
  • 5. 人人文庫網(wǎng)僅提供信息存儲空間,僅對用戶上傳內(nèi)容的表現(xiàn)方式做保護(hù)處理,對用戶上傳分享的文檔內(nèi)容本身不做任何修改或編輯,并不能對任何下載內(nèi)容負(fù)責(zé)。
  • 6. 下載文件中如有侵權(quán)或不適當(dāng)內(nèi)容,請與我們聯(lián)系,我們立即糾正。
  • 7. 本站不保證下載資源的準(zhǔn)確性、安全性和完整性, 同時也不承擔(dān)用戶因使用這些下載資源對自己和他人造成任何形式的傷害或損失。

評論

0/150

提交評論