法學(xué)張海超法律英語(yǔ)案例模版課件

開(kāi)胸驗(yàn)出制度“塵肺〞ABriefDescriptionOfTheCaseName:ZhangHaichaoResume：2004.8workedinZhengZhouZhendongwear-resistingcorporation2007.8startedcoughingandhadachestexaminationbutdidnotknowtheresult2021losttheabilitytoworkbediagnosedaspneumoconiosis(塵肺〕2021.6openedthechest

TheResultOfTheCaseandthe“?〞ZhengZhouMunicipalCommittee(鄭州市政委)criticizedthe“OccupationalDiseasePrecautionClinic〞(職防所)andpunishedtheresponsiblepeoplebymakingthemsuspended,removedorcancelingtheirprofessionalqualification.

?Isthatenough?●ZhengZhouZhendongwear-resistingcorporationgaveZhangcompensations〔賠償〕615000yuanintotal.●?Isthatenough?controversialfocuses2.ThelawofOccupationaldiseaseprevention〔職業(yè)病防治法〕didn’tprotectworkershealthrightsverywell,whichgoesagainsttheconstitution.3.Whethertheprivilegesofthediagnosis〔診斷特權(quán)〕ofoccupationaldiseaseshouldbecanceled?Ifso(1)whatisthenewcriteria?(2)Doesitneedtoconnectwiththegovernment?TheVoicesBesidesthefocuses,let'slistentomanydifferentvoices1.thesystemofphysicalexaminationinthecompanyiswrong!2.theproofwhichneedtoshowbeforehavingthetestinODPC〔職防所)shouldnothavetocomefromthecompany.3.Italsoreflectsthatthereisanareathatthegovernmentforgottogovern.Constitutionavailable第二十一條國(guó)家開(kāi)展醫(yī)療衛(wèi)生事業(yè)……舉辦各種醫(yī)療衛(wèi)生設(shè)施…...保護(hù)人民健康。ConstitutionavailablelawofOccupationaldiseaseprevention(職防法〕●WhatwecanlearnandthinkWeneedtofillinrelevant“systemholes〞,safeguardthelegalrightsandinterestsofworkers..Forexample,whenthefirmrefusesto“incriminatehimself〞〔自證其罪〕,therelevantgovernmentdepartmentsorjudicial〔司法〕departmentsshouldinvestigateitssins〔罪〕.Orwecanmakethecompanyacceptsupervision〔監(jiān)督〕ofthesociety,helpingthe“patientswithoccupationaldisease〞timelyenterintolegaldiagnosis〔診斷〕program.●●Forthose“occupational-diseasediagnosisorganizations〞〔職業(yè)病診斷機(jī)構(gòu)〕whichdonotstrictlyperformtheirduties,beafraidofresponsibilities,avoidconflicts,evendeliberately"misdiagnose",theyshouldbepublicsupervised.

Atlast,itisurgenttoimprovetherelatedlawsandregulations,strengthenthesupervisiono