英語單選集考試卷模擬考試_題_11

1、姓名：_ 班級：_ 學號：_-密-封 -線- 英語單選集考試卷模擬考試_題考試時間：120分鐘 考試總分：100分題號一二三四五總分分數(shù)遵守考場紀律，維護知識尊嚴，杜絕違紀行為，確?？荚嚱Y(jié)果公正。1、anyone who has ever attended a university knows that the quality of lecturers varies greatly. a few are very effective communicators, conveying the substance of their lectures clearly and interestingl

2、y and inspiring students to want to know more about the subject. others produce dull lectures from which the students learn little and which are likely to kill any interest they may have in the subject. lecturing is a major part of a university lecturers job and it would seem reasonable that effecti

3、veness in this task should be a major standard in assessing a lecturer for promotion. however, it is very often the case that far more weight is given to such factors as participation in research, number of publications and even performance of administrative duties. my point of view is that a lectur

4、ers lecturing should be regularly evaluated and that the best people to carry out this evaluation are those directly on the receiving end.it could, of course, be argued that students are not competent to evaluate the academic quality of lectures, if anyone should evaluate lecturers, it should be the

5、ir colleagues. however, i am not arguing that students should be asked to comment on the academic content of lectures, but to evaluate the effectiveness.i suspect that many of the objections to student evaluation stem from the fear some lecturers have of being subject to criticism by their students.

6、 however, lecturers should see such evaluation as an opportunity to become aware of defects in their lecturing techniques and thus to become better lecturers. such a system should benefit both students and lecturers as well as help department heads to assess the strengths and weaknesses of their tea

7、ching staff.according to the author, all the students know that _. （ ）a.there are great differences among the lecturers as to their quality of teachingb.quite a lot of teachers can produce the results students desirec.they must be inspired to learnd.it is too dull to attend lectures2、anyone who has

8、ever attended a university knows that the quality of lecturers varies greatly. a few are very effective communicators, conveying the substance of their lectures clearly and interestingly and inspiring students to want to know more about the subject. others produce dull lectures from which the studen

9、ts learn little and which are likely to kill any interest they may have in the subject. lecturing is a major part of a university lecturers job and it would seem reasonable that effectiveness in this task should be a major standard in assessing a lecturer for promotion. however, it is very often the

10、 case that far more weight is given to such factors as participation in research, number of publications and even performance of administrative duties. my point of view is that a lecturers lecturing should be regularly evaluated and that the best people to carry out this evaluation are those directl

11、y on the receiving end.it could, of course, be argued that students are not competent to evaluate the academic quality of lectures, if anyone should evaluate lecturers, it should be their colleagues. however, i am not arguing that students should be asked to comment on the academic content of lectur

12、es, but to evaluate the effectiveness.i suspect that many of the objections to student evaluation stem from the fear some lecturers have of being subject to criticism by their students. however, lecturers should see such evaluation as an opportunity to become aware of defects in their lecturing tech

13、niques and thus to become better lecturers. such a system should benefit both students and lecturers as well as help department heads to assess the strengths and weaknesses of their teaching staff.in the authors opinion, teachers can only be promoted depending on _. （ ）a.how well they get along with

14、 the studentsb.how well they give their lecturesc.how many papers and books they have publishedd.how well they conduct their academic researches3、anyone who has ever attended a university knows that the quality of lecturers varies greatly. a few are very effective communicators, conveying the substa

15、nce of their lectures clearly and interestingly and inspiring students to want to know more about the subject. others produce dull lectures from which the students learn little and which are likely to kill any interest they may have in the subject. lecturing is a major part of a university lecturers

16、 job and it would seem reasonable that effectiveness in this task should be a major standard in assessing a lecturer for promotion. however, it is very often the case that far more weight is given to such factors as participation in research, number of publications and even performance of administra

17、tive duties. my point of view is that a lecturers lecturing should be regularly evaluated and that the best people to carry out this evaluation are those directly on the receiving end.it could, of course, be argued that students are not competent to evaluate the academic quality of lectures, if anyo

18、ne should evaluate lecturers, it should be their colleagues. however, i am not arguing that students should be asked to comment on the academic content of lectures, but to evaluate the effectiveness.i suspect that many of the objections to student evaluation stem from the fear some lecturers have of

19、 being subject to criticism by their students. however, lecturers should see such evaluation as an opportunity to become aware of defects in their lecturing techniques and thus to become better lecturers. such a system should benefit both students and lecturers as well as help department heads to as

20、sess the strengths and weaknesses of their teaching staff.which of the following statements is true according to the passage （ ）a.students are academically capable of making comments on the skills of teaching.b.students are actually capable of judging the class accomplishments of lectures.c.students

21、 likes and interests are the standards of evaluation of a teachers lecturing.d.students are not to give assessments of a teachers lecturin4、anyone who has ever attended a university knows that the quality of lecturers varies greatly. a few are very effective communicators, conveying the substance of

22、 their lectures clearly and interestingly and inspiring students to want to know more about the subject. others produce dull lectures from which the students learn little and which are likely to kill any interest they may have in the subject. lecturing is a major part of a university lecturers job a

23、nd it would seem reasonable that effectiveness in this task should be a major standard in assessing a lecturer for promotion. however, it is very often the case that far more weight is given to such factors as participation in research, number of publications and even performance of administrative d

24、uties. my point of view is that a lecturers lecturing should be regularly evaluated and that the best people to carry out this evaluation are those directly on the receiving end.it could, of course, be argued that students are not competent to evaluate the academic quality of lectures, if anyone should evaluate lecturers, it should be their colleagues. however, i am not arguing that students should be asked to comment on the academic content of lectures, but to evaluate the effectiveness.i suspect that many of the objection