7個鉆石ppt課件

1、17 Diamond Process七顆鉆石流程Developed by: GMTG-ArlingtonL. ONeal / C. Kessler Aug 2000Revised: 8 Aug 20002What is the 7 Diamond Process?七顆鉆石的流程是什么？The 7 Diamond Process is one of many tools that can be used in the problem solving process.七顆鉆石流程是可以用來解決質(zhì)量問題的工具之一。This tool is used to investigate discrepanc

2、ies discovered by the following: 它可以用來調(diào)查以下方面發(fā)現(xiàn)的差異 Global Customer Audit System (GCAS) 全球顧客評審 Yard Walk Audits 生產(chǎn)線上巡檢 Verification Stations 檢驗工位3 Purpose of the 7 Diamond Process 7顆鉆石流程的目的 The 7 Diamond Process is a structured way of assessing our manufacturing process to determine whether of not it

3、has failed to meet the quality standard demanded by our customers.7顆鉆石流程是一個評價我們的制造流程，是否滿足了顧客所要求的質(zhì)量標準的方法。47 Diamond Process 流程Responsibility責任責任Production第一步第一步 1Production第二步第二步2Production第三步第三步3Rel. Engineer/SQA/Supplier負責的負責的SQDE工工程師程師/供應供應商商 4CorrectProcess?正確的工藝CorrectTool?正確的工具正確的工具CorrectPart?

4、正確的零件正確的零件Parts Quality?零件質(zhì)量零件質(zhì)量Responsibility責任責任Process ControlManagers工藝控制負責人工藝控制負責人5aIs Engineering support required?是否需要工程方面的支持是否需要工程方面的支持Problem IdentifiedBegin Interrogation問題定義問題定義(開始調(diào)查開始調(diào)查)Responsibility責任責任QET PST (Lead)5bSMTRGM (Lead)6Statistical Engineering(Red X Strategies)統(tǒng)計工程統(tǒng)計工程(紅紅-X

5、方法方法)7Will Process ChangeResolve?工藝更改能解決問題嗎工藝更改能解決問題嗎Product ChangeRequired?產(chǎn)品更改需要嗎？產(chǎn)品更改需要嗎？Hardy Perennial or Extremely ComplexProblem非常復雜的問題非常復雜的問題SQA - Supplier Quality AssuranceQET - Quality Engineering TeamPST - Plant Support TeamSMT- Systems Management TeamRGM - Reliability Growth Management5R

6、eview of Responsibility職責回顧 Diamonds 1-4Production & Reliability鉆石1-4 生產(chǎn)&可靠性 Filter 5aProcess Control Manager (PCM)5a 過濾 工藝控制負責人 Diamond 5b-7Product Engineering鉆石5b-7 產(chǎn)品工程6Insert Sample CountermeasureCard Here此處插入對策卡樣卡77 Diamond Process Stages流程的各步驟Stages 1 & 2 of the process are used to

7、 determine if the Production organization is running the assembly process to design intent. 1 1、2 2步是用來測定生產(chǎn)部門運行的裝配流程是否滿足設計內(nèi)容。步是用來測定生產(chǎn)部門運行的裝配流程是否滿足設計內(nèi)容。 The initial investigation (Stage 1) is done where the defect was identified.最初的調(diào)查最初的調(diào)查(第一步第一步)應在發(fā)現(xiàn)缺陷的地方開始應在發(fā)現(xiàn)缺陷的地方開始Stage 2 is only used when the in

8、vestigation in Stage 1 determined that the cause of the problem was from an upstream source. 第第2步只能當?shù)谝徊降恼{(diào)查步只能當?shù)谝徊降恼{(diào)查,確定問題是來源其他方面時確定問題是來源其他方面時,才可開始才可開始If the process isnt being managed to design intent, then it must be corrected and validated, prior to asking for Engineering assistance.如果工藝沒有滿足設計內(nèi)容，當

9、需要工程方面的協(xié)助前，必須進行糾正并要有如果工藝沒有滿足設計內(nèi)容，當需要工程方面的協(xié)助前，必須進行糾正并要有效。效。Engineering referral (Stage 3) occurs when the manufacturing process does meet design intent and the problem still exists.當制造過程滿足設計內(nèi)容并且問題依然存在時，第當制造過程滿足設計內(nèi)容并且問題依然存在時，第3步開始。步開始。81 - Correct Process正確的過程 Are the correct Best People Practice shee

10、ts posted?是否有正確的操作指導文件？ Are the Best People Practices being followed?是否執(zhí)行操作文件？ Is the operators Key Point Chart being followed?是否滿足關鍵操作點控制圖 Are the correct documents posted on the operation certification board? 是否在操作示板上有正確的文件 Is the job being performed to the PADs?是否按照PAD操作 Can any of these cause th

11、e problem?以下的問題有可能產(chǎn)生問題嗎？以下的問題有可能產(chǎn)生問題嗎？Stages 1&2ProductionCorrects正確的正確的生產(chǎn)生產(chǎn)Production2Production3Rel. Engineer/SQA/Supplier 4CorrectProcess?正確的工藝過程正確的工藝過程CorrectTool?正確的工具正確的工具CorrectPart?正確的零件正確的零件Parts Quality?零件的質(zhì)量零件的質(zhì)量81 - Correct Process正確的過程 Has a mandatory sequence been identified? Is it

12、 being followed? 是否強制的操作序列號已識別，是否執(zhí)行了 Is the job being done the same on both shifts?在各班次中操作工作是否一致 Does the operator understand what the product standards are?操作者是否理解產(chǎn)品標準 Is it the regular operator? Has there been a lot of turnover on the job? 是否為固定操作工？是否此操作有很多輪換人員 Has the operator been properly train

13、ed?操作者是否正確培訓過 Are the visual aids current? 目前是否有目視化的輔助措施 Does the operator understand the quality outcomes of her/his job?操作者是否知道他/她的崗位的產(chǎn)品的輸出質(zhì)量 Does the operator know how to communicate when he/she has a problem?操作者是否知道當他/她的崗位出現(xiàn)質(zhì)量問題時如何傳遞溝通信息？Can any of these cause the problem?以下的問題有可能產(chǎn)生問題嗎？以下的問題有可能產(chǎn)

14、生問題嗎？Stages 1&2ProductionCorrects正確的正確的生產(chǎn)生產(chǎn)Production2Production3Rel. Engineer/SQA/Supplier 4CorrectProcess?正確的工藝過程正確的工藝過程CorrectTool?正確的工具正確的工具CorrectPart?正確的零件正確的零件Parts Quality?零件質(zhì)量零件質(zhì)量9 Are the correct tools & fixtures being used? (both shifts) 是否使用正確的工具/夾具(各班次) Are the tools set to the

15、specified torque? 工具是否設置成規(guī)定的扭矩 Are they properly calibrated?是否進行適當?shù)男?Are both shifts using the same tool? 是否各班次用同樣的工具 Are the bits or sockets worn?是否螺絲刀或套筒已磨損 Has an extra air hose been attached to the tool? 是否在工具上有多余的空氣管 Is the tool tied to the Andon system?工具是否與暗燈相連 Has the tool been put on Bypas

16、s?是否工具被旁路 Do the tools & fixtures have mutilation protection?是否工具/夾具有損毀保護 Has the workstation been error proofed? 工位是否有防錯設施 Does the workstation layout allow the operator to work effectively? 是否工位的布置適合操作者有效的工作 Has the Preventive Maintenance been done? (check log) 是否進行了預防性維修(檢查表) Are tools functi

17、oning correctly? 工具功能是否正確Stages 1&2ProductionCorrectsProduction1Production3Rel. Engineer/SQA/Supplier 4CorrectProcess?正確的工藝過程正確的工藝過程CorrectTool?正確的工具正確的工具CorrectPart?正確的零件正確的零件Parts Quality?零件質(zhì)量零件質(zhì)量2 - Correct Tool正確的工具Can any of these cause the problem?10 Is the Parts Routing current?零件的路徑是否正確

18、Are the correct part numbers identified on the material racks?是否在料架上標識有正確的零件號 Are parts stocked in correct location on the rack?在料架上擺放位置是否正確 Do the part numbers on the boxes agree with the rack?包裝盒上零件號與料架上是否一致 Are all pull cards available?拉動卡是否有效 Has a PAA been issued changing part usage?是否有零件用途改變的P

19、AA Has the PAA expired?PAA是否過期 Is error proofing needed?是否需要防錯措施 Is existing error proofing device working correctly? 是否已有的防錯設備運行正確Stages 1&2Production1Rel. Engineer/SQA/Supplier 4CorrectProcess?正確的工藝過程正確的工藝過程ProductionCorrectsCorrectPart?正確的零件正確的零件Production2CorrectTool?正確的工具正確的工具Parts Quality?

20、零件質(zhì)量零件質(zhì)量3 - Correct Part正確的零件Can any of these cause the problem?11The Reliability Engineer is responsible for determining if parts have changed and overall part quality. If parts quality (out of specification) is determined to be the problems root cause, then the RE will: write PR&Rs to notify t

21、he supplier that there is a problem.可靠性工程師確定零件是否更改過并對產(chǎn)品全部質(zhì)量負責。如果由于零件質(zhì)量(超差)是根本原因，那么應：填寫PR&R通知供應商： work with Supplier Quality to validate the corrections.同供應商共同確認糾正措施set up sorting operations and production will support sorting of material at the operation.采取篩選措施，制造應支持在工位上的物料篩選 work with Group Lea

22、ders to validate countermeasures or containment.同工段長共同確認對策和遏制措施If part variation within specification is the root cause, then the RE will:如果確認零件在規(guī)范內(nèi)，那么RE應：work with the supplier and SQA to move the part back to the needed range within the specification同供應商共同工作，SQA將零件返回到規(guī)范內(nèi)需要的范圍work with Quality Engi

23、neering to determine if an Engineering Change is required to provide irreversible corrective action同質(zhì)量工程師合作，確定是否需要工程更改這種不能消除的糾正措施Stages 1&2Production1CorrectProcess?正確的工藝流程正確的工藝流程Rel. Engineer/SQA/SupplierPartsQuality?零件質(zhì)量零件質(zhì)量Production2CorrectTool?正確的工具正確的工具CorrectPart?正確的零件正確的零件Production34 -

24、Part Quality零件質(zhì)量12Diamonds 1-4 in Review鉆石1-4步回顧Diamonds 1-4 are for evaluating the stability of the process. 1-4步用來評價工藝過程的穩(wěn)定性Once a problem has been identified, the automatic response must be to immediately step thru diamonds 1-4.當問題被定義后，1-4步的負責人員就自動確定下來It must become inherent in our problem solvin

25、g thought process.這些步驟是問題解決過程中固定的流程Responsibility職責職責Process ControlManagers過程控制負責人過程控制負責人5aIs Engineering support required?是否需要工程的支持是否需要工程的支持135a - Engineering Filter 5a-工程過濾Is Engineering support required? 需要工程方面的支持嗎5a is a step to filter out and resolve less-complex issues before seeking help fro

26、m Quality Engineering.5a是一步過濾出并將不復雜的問題在尋求質(zhì)量工程幫助前解決The Process Control Manager is responsible for conducting initial studies prior to escalating the issue.過程控制負責人負責在提升問題前指導初始研究These studies may include but are not limited to:這些研究應包括但不局限在:Problem Definition Tree 問題定義樹 5 Whys 5個為什么 Statistical Process

27、Control 統(tǒng)計過程控制 Design of Experiment (DOE) 試驗設計Shainin Techniques (quick & dirty) 技術(快速& 臟) If after the initial studies the cause of variation has not been determined, the issue is referred to Product Engineering. The problem definition tree is the minimum exit criteria to go from Diamond 5a

28、 to 5b. 如果經(jīng)過初始研究，變差的產(chǎn)生原因還沒有確定，就需要產(chǎn)品工程的支持。問題定義樹是從5a-5b的基本方法。QualityEngineering質(zhì)量工程5aProblem Solving Toolbox 問題問題解決工具箱解決工具箱Project title: Poor adjustment of RR door panel 805-830Leader: Pedro Aranda AlfaroSponsor:Juan Carlos LiceaArea: VAETCoach: Leonardo Chvez salcedoInitial date: oct-04-2002Final da

29、te: oct-29-2002Problem description:This month it was reported by the shipping lot in USA a problem of quality existed in the 805/830 vehicles. The problem is the poor adjustment in RR door panel.Projects statement:Find and improve the Red X that produce the poor adjustment in the RR door panel for t

30、he model 805/830 in Silao Assembly plant.Strategy:We initiated this project using the model to model strategy, because there was a good contrast and good leverage based on multi-vari see pag 6.Measurement system:As measurement system a Force gage was used.This measurement system passed the isoplot w

31、ith DR=13.6, DM=1.0 lbs, and DP=13.6 lbs (see page 4)Clue generation:Stage 1 shows that the Red X doesnt live in the process. The stage 2 shows that the Red X lives in the door panel. The pair comparison shows that the door molding is the part with the best contrast.Statistical confirmation:Once we

32、detected the Red X candidate, I decided to do a B vs C six pack trial, in order to confirm the door molding is the influence to make the customer satisfaction. The six pack passed with 95% of confidence and end count of 6.Irreversible corrective action:To modified the flange 1.5 mm in length to keep

33、 a better position and avoid that the door panel take out of position.Improvements:Reduce warranty cost to repair the door panel caused by poor fit (loose) and eliminate the condition in 100% in vehicles 805/830 models. The amount of money from jul 01 to jul 02 was 11,084.77 USD.Lessons learned:We l

34、earned that is necessary looking other alternatives using other strategy when is not possible invest money but always focus to guarantee the customer enthusiasm, therefore this project is an example of this.Executive Summary 執(zhí)行總結(jié)項目題目項目題目：右后門板調(diào)整不好(805/830車型)。領導領導； Pedro Adranda Alfaro發(fā)起人發(fā)起人： Juan Car

35、los Licea區(qū)域區(qū)域： VAET教練教練： Leonardo Chavez salcedo起使日起使日： 2002年10月4日截止日截止日：2002年10月29日問題描述問題描述： 本月收到報告，在美國有關于門飾板的質(zhì)量問題，右后門飾板調(diào)整不好。(805/830型)項目綜述項目綜述： 針對Lilao裝配廠805/830車型的右后門飾板，發(fā)現(xiàn)并解決其配合不好的問題。策略策略： 我們起初應用車型對車型策略，因為多車之間有很好的對比度和平衡關系。(見見第6頁)測量系統(tǒng)測量系統(tǒng)：用測力計作為測量系統(tǒng)。這種測量系統(tǒng)通過等量圖。 (DR=13.6, M=1.0lbs, P=13.6lbs見第4頁 線

36、索產(chǎn)生線索產(chǎn)生： 階段1表明紅X不在過程中。階段2表明紅X產(chǎn)生在門飾板處。成對比較表明門型是成對比較點。統(tǒng)計確認統(tǒng)計確認：一旦我們查到了候選的紅X，我們決定做B vs C六組數(shù)據(jù)比較，這是為了確認門型影響客戶滿意度。用6對數(shù)據(jù)進行比較具有95%的可信度和最大累加值為6.不可撤銷的糾正措施不可撤銷的糾正措施：為使門邊緣加長1.5mm以保證正確的位置不偏離。改進措施改進措施：減少保修費用來修復由于配合不好產(chǎn)生的門飾板問題，并且100%消除803/805車型的缺陷。學到的經(jīng)驗學到的經(jīng)驗： 我們學到了 當投資不會太多的情況下，用其它策略以尋求可選擇的方法解決問題。但始終要關注顧客熱忱。此項目便是一個這

37、樣的例子。Project Definition Tree/項目定義樹項目定義樹G e o m e tric /幾 何 特 性R H /右 側(cè)5 0 %F in d a n d e lim in a te th e R e d X th a t c a u s e sp o o r a d ju s tm e n t in th e R R d o o r p a n e l a t8 0 5 /8 3 0 m o d e ls /發(fā) 現(xiàn) 和 消 除 8 0 5 /8 3 0 車 型上 出 現(xiàn) 的 引 起 后 側(cè) 門 飾 板 調(diào) 整 困 難 的 紅 XB o th H /兩 側(cè)L H /左 側(cè)5

38、 0 %R e a r d o o r/后 門1 0 0 %F ro n t d o o r/前 門0 %B o th /都 有E ffo rt to re le a s e th e d o o r p a n e l(lb s )車 門 飾 板 拆 卸 力 (磅 )O th e r/其 它E v e n t/事 件D e fe c t/缺 陷P h y s ic /物 理 特 性D o o r p a n e l lo o s e /車 門 飾 板 松 動8 0 5 /8 3 0 m o d e ls 車 型Problem characterization問題描述Warranty cond

39、ition/保修條件The problem is presented only in the rear door問題只是在后側(cè)車門出現(xiàn)BASEDBASED: DISTRIBUTON LOT CAMPAINGCURRENTCURRENT: 100 % door panel 805830 models loose目前狀態(tài)：805/830型車門飾板100%松動。GOALGOAL: eliminate 100% the poor fit.目標：100%消除不良的配合Project statement項目綜述Need energy to release the trim door panel需要用力才能

40、卸下門飾板Customer is calling the problem in both sides客戶現(xiàn)在對兩側(cè)都在抱怨Effort to release (lbs)/Effort to release (lbs)/釋放力釋放力( (磅磅) )Frequency頻率頻率051015202530354006121824303642CURRENT現(xiàn)有現(xiàn)有DESIRED希希望望DM=1.19 lbs/磅Prosess過程Rest of vehicle車輛其它部分Modified the flange 1.5 mm in length將法蘭在長度上修改1.5厘米The Red X is the do

41、or moding thatis being installed in the trim panel紅X是被安裝在車門飾板內(nèi)的車門飾板飾件Molding door panel車門飾板飾件Rest of door車門其它部分Trim door panel車門飾板Parts零件Model 車型to 對Model 車型Other strategy其它策略DP= 29 lbs磅Solution tree項目解決樹項目解決樹TARGET: Eliminate condition 100%目標：目標： 100%100%消除現(xiàn)有問題消除現(xiàn)有問題PASSED ISOPLOT DR=15.2 SEE PAG 4

42、通過等量圖驗證 DR=15.2 參見第4頁PASSED STAGE 1 SO THE RED X DOESNT LIVE IN THE PROCESS SEE PAG # 7.通過第一階段驗證，因此紅X不在裝配過程中，參見第7頁。THE COMPONENT SEARCH STAGE 2 SHOWS THAT THE RED X DOES NOT LIVE IN THE TRIM DOOR PANEL SO LIVES IN THE REST OF THE DOOR PANEL. SEE PAG # 7./零部件分析階段2顯示紅X不是由車門內(nèi)飾板造成的,所以應是由車門板的其余部分引起的,見7頁.

43、PAIR COMPARISON SHOWS THAT THE DOOR PANEL MOLDING HAS THE CHARACTERISTIC THAT PRODUCE THE DIFFERENCE SEE PAG 9/ 配對對比顯示車門飾板飾件有造成差異的特征，參見第9頁THIS IS THE BEST STRATEGY BASED ON MULTIVARI SEE PAG 5.這是基于多重變換比較得出的最佳策略，參見第5頁。PASSED B vs C WHERE IT SHOWS THAT THE DOOR MOLDING KEEP IN POSITION THE DOOR PANEL

44、SEE PAG 10, BUT WE CHOICE OTHER CHARACTERISTIC THAT KEEP IN POSITION THE DOOR PANEL AND WITOUT INVEST MONEY SEE PAG 11 & 13.通過BC對比試驗，顯示車門飾板飾件能夠使車門飾板保持正確位置，見第10頁。但是我們選擇能夠保證車門飾板位置并且不用增加投資的其它特性，參見第11和13頁。Frequency頻率頻率GREEN Y RUN CHART SEE PAG 17/綠Y字流程圖參見第17頁。051015202530354006121824303642DESIRED希希望

45、望CURRENT現(xiàn)有現(xiàn)有BASED: DISTRIBUTON LOT CAMPAINGEffort to release (lbs)Effort to release (lbs)釋放力釋放力( (磅磅) )D DM = 1.0 lbsD DP = 13.6 lbsDR = 13.6Passed Isoplot IsoplotA Force gage was usedas the measurement system拉力計作為測量工具拉力計作為測量工具通過ISOPLOT評估POINT TOPOINTThere are no contrast in this strategy there are

46、no difference.There is a good contrast but the leverage is not enough because we dont have tools to measure it.This strategy provide good contrast and the best leverage based on multi-vari chart see pag 6There are no contrast through the timeStrategy diagram PLANT TOPLANTMODEL TOMODELTRUCK TOTRUCKSI

47、DE TOSIDESAME PANELSAME PLANTSAME MODELSAME TRUCKThere is a contrast between truck to truck and good leverage but the contrast is not enough based on multi-vari see page 6.EVENT TOEVENTSAME POINTThere are no contrast in this strategy there are no difference event to event.策略圖事件對事件同一個點點對點同一塊扳同一側(cè)對同一側(cè)同

48、一臺車車對車同一型號型號對型號同一個工廠工廠對工廠在這個對比中,無差異.在這個對比中,無差異.在這個對比中,有差異.但無測量工具.在車與車的對比中,有差異.但不能滿足MULTI-VARI的要求.在這個對比中,有差異.且能滿足MULTI-VARI的要求.在這個對比中,無差異.510152025303540455014710131619222528313437404346495255586164677073767982858891Multi - variNOTE: This graphic shows that the best contrast is model to model.SideTru

49、ck 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31EFFORT TO TAKE OFF (lbs)R L R L R L R L R L R L R L R L R L R L R L R L R L R L R L R L R L R L R L R L R L R L R L R L R L R L R L R L R L R L R LCustomer satisfaction limitBOBWOWModel C C C C A A A A A A A A A A

50、A S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S SNOTE: S: SUBURBAN 830 MODEL A: AVALANCHE 805 MODEL C: CADILLAC 806 MODEL注:SAC三種車型最好最壞顧客的滿意底線注:此圖顯示出在型號與型號的對比中有最大的差異.松脫力(磅)Component searchNOTE: This graphic shows that the Red X suspect does not live in the process because it passed the stage #1. The stage 2 shows th

51、at the Red X suspect does not live in the seal window. So the Red X suspect lives in the molding door panel.48.416.27.54746.348.246.647.58.58.30102030405060OriginalR1 & R1 (Door Panel)R2 & R2 (Door Panel)R3 & R3 (Door Panel)Seal WindowDoor PanelMolding door panelHomeE

52、ffort (lbs)BOBWOWSTAGE 1STAGE 2第一階段第二階段最好最壞原狀態(tài)第一次拆裝第二次拆裝第三次拆裝門窗密封條門飾板門飾板飾條鉸鏈注:這個圖顯示因為通過了第一階段的試驗,所以RED X不是由操作造成.第二階段的試驗顯示門窗密封條不是RED X,門飾板飾條是RED X要素查找規(guī)則規(guī)則Rule 1.Rule 1.There are complete separation There are complete separation between the BOB and WOW values.between the BOB and WOW values.將最好和最壞的值完全分開

53、將最好和最壞的值完全分開規(guī)則規(guī)則Rule 2. DYV1RRule 2. DYV1R設設Where: Where: R= R= RBOB + RWOW RBOB + RWOW 2 2那么那么thenthenRBOB=1.9RBOB=1.9RWOW=1.2RWOW=1.2R= R= 1.9 + 1.2 1.9 + 1.2 = = 3.13.1 = 1.55.= 1.55. 2 2 2 2DY = YBOB - YWOW = DY = YBOB - YWOW = 46.8 - 8.1 = 38.7 46.8 - 8.1 = 38.7 如果如果ififDY V1RDY V1R那么那么thenthen

54、 38.7 (0.89) 38.7 (0.89) (1.55)(1.55)所以所以soso 38.7 1.38 38.7 1.38 所以滿足規(guī)則所以滿足規(guī)則1 1和規(guī)則和規(guī)則2 2的要求的要求so passed Rule 1 and Rule 2通過問題為每個單元設定判定極限通過問題為每個單元設定判定極限Set decision limits for each unit by using the questions:Set decision limits for each unit by using the questions:DLBOB= YBOB + V2RDLBOB= YBOB + V2

55、RDLWOW= YWOW + V2RDLWOW= YWOW + V2R那么那么Then Then udl = 48.83 udl = 48.83 DLBOB = 46.8 + 1.31 (1.55) = DLBOB = 46.8 + 1.31 (1.55) = ldl = 44.77 ldl = 44.77 udl = 10.13 udl = 10.13 DLWOW = 8.1 + 1.31 (1.55) = DLWOW = 8.1 + 1.31 (1.55) = ldl = 6.07 ldl = 6.07 結(jié)果結(jié)果ResultsCARACTERISTICABOB(144794)WOW(145

56、644)BOB(145190)WOW(145687)BOB(144542)WOW(145688)BOB(144721)WOW(144934)BOB(144614)WOW(144966)Gree Y34.59.746.343.49.730.512.1門飾件門飾件Door moldingYESNOYESNOYESNOYESNOYESNOPaired Comparison備注備注NOTE: We consider that the door panel molding is the Red X NOTE: We consider that the door panel mold

57、ing is the Red X candidate in the pair comparison because is the only difference candidate in the pair comparison because is the only difference between panel to panel. In 805/830 vs 806 models.between panel to panel. In 805/830 vs 806 models.我們認為門板裝飾我們認為門板裝飾件是可能的件是可能的Red X, Red X, 因為在車型因為在車型805/830

58、 805/830 和和 車型車型806806對比后只有門板有差異。對比后只有門板有差異。WOWWOWBOBBOBDOOR MOLDINGRED X CANDIDATEPassed B vs C with 95% of confidence that the molding Passed B vs C with 95% of confidence that the molding door panel is the Red X with complete separation and end door panel is the Red X with complete separation and

59、 end count of 6.count of 6.在在 完全分離，完全分離，End count End count 為為5 5的情況下，的情況下， 以以95%95%的置的置信度通過信度通過B v S B v S 表明門板裝飾件是表明門板裝飾件是Red XRed XB vs C Six packB = 有門飾件的有門飾件的車車Vehicles with door molding.C = 沒有飾件的車沒有飾件的車Vehicles without door molding. Req: 置信置信度度confidence = 95%次序次序OrderGreen Y (lbs)B25.9yesB50y

60、esC8.6noB28.6yesC16.3noB25.9yesB50yesC16.3noC13.3noC13.3noB28.6yesC8.6noRed X 門飾件門飾件doormoldingRed X 門飾件門飾件doormolding試驗試驗Test排序排序Ranked orderGreen Y (lbs)Once confirmed that the RED X is living in the door panel molding, we Once confirmed that the RED X is living in the door panel molding, we decided to change our strategy from decided to change our strategy fro