版權(quán)說(shuō)明:本文檔由用戶提供并上傳,收益歸屬內(nèi)容提供方,若內(nèi)容存在侵權(quán),請(qǐng)進(jìn)行舉報(bào)或認(rèn)領(lǐng)
文檔簡(jiǎn)介
1、68%18%14%020406080PCICABG-30-33-29-28-22-40-30-20-100LDL-CStrokeTotalmortality% *Confidence interval (CI) not reported.95% CI, 14%-41%.95% CI, 16%-37%.95% CI, 12%-31%.Hebert PR et al. JAMA. 1997;278:313-321.Nonfatal/fatal CHDCVDmortalityPyrl K et al. Diabetes Care. 1997;20:614-620.0.500.600.700.800.
2、901.000.001.002.003.004.005.000123456Proportionwithoutmajor CHD eventYr since randomization- P=0.002- P=0.0001Diabetic, simvastatinDiabetic, placeboNondiabetic, simvastatinNondiabetic, placebo32%55%Haffner SM et al. Diabetes. 1998;(suppl 1):A54. Abstract.-46-56-40-43-60-50-40-30-20-100Totalmortality
3、CoronarymortalityMajorcoronaryeventsRevas-culari-zations inevents(%)P=0.005P=0.001P=0.010Acute coronaryeventNo history of CADAcute Coronary Syndromest=0Randomization:CARE - 320 moLIPID - 336 moRandomization:6 moStable CAD71249-275-16-50-40-30-20-1001020TCHDL-CTGPlaceboAtorvastatin 80 mg% Data from S
4、chwartz GG et al. JAMA. 2001;285:1711-1718.Additional data courtesy of GG Schwartz.unstable anginaor nonQ-wave MI3,086randomized2496 hafter admissionFollowed 16 weeks0510150481216Time since randomization (wk)Cumulativeincidence(%)RR = 0.84(95% CI, 0.70-1.00) P = 0.048AtorvastatinPlacebo17.414.8*Deat
5、h (any cause), nonfatal MI, resuscitated cardiac arrest, recurrent symptomatic myocardial ischemia with objective evidence requiring emergency rehospitalization.Schwartz GG et al. JAMA. 2001;285:1711-1700.751.001.252.00Relative riskDeathNonfatal MIResuscitatedcardiac arrestNo. (%) of event
6、s*Adapted from Schwartz GG et al. JAMA. 2001;285:1711-1718.0.00.51.01.52.00481216Time since randomization (wk)RR = 0.50(95% CI, 0.26-0.99)P = 0.045Placebo1.6Cumulativeincidence(%)Data from Schwartz GG et al. JAMA. 2001;285:1711-1718.19,599 men and women 80 yo discharged post AMI, 58 Swedish Hospital
7、s, 1995-19985528 (28%) statin rx vs 14071 (72%) no statin rx, highest hospital rates of use 48%; lowest 12% Stenestrand JAMA 2001;285;430-436RR 0.75 (0.63-0.89)P=0.001 25% Risk ReductionHeeschen C et al. Circulation. 2002;105:1446-1452.051015202530181614121086420Follow-up (day)Event rates (%) Statin
8、s discontinuedNo statinsStatins continued507090110130150170190210TNT 80mgTNT 10 mgCARE-SLIPID-S4S-SCARE-PLIPID-PTNT Entry4S-PAVERT 80mg: LDL=77 mg/dL13.4% Event RateIIIa IIbIII=ACC/AHA Practice GuidelinesACC/ AHAUA/ NSTEMIGuidelines 2002Risk ratio and 95% CISTATINPLACEBOBaselinefeature(10269)(10267)
9、STATIN betterSTATIN worseSTATIN worsePrevious MI10071255Other CHD (not MI)452597No prior CHD CVD182215PVD332427Diabetes279369SE 2.6(2P0.00001)1.01.21.4Risk ratio and 95% CISTATINPLACEBOBaselinefeature(10269)(10267)STATIN betterSTATIN worseLDL (mg/dl)Hetc22= 0.8 100 130670881 13010875ALL PAT
10、IENTS20422606(19.9%)(25.4%)SE 2.6(2P0.00001)1.01.21.4(2.6 mmol/l)(3.4 mmol/l)01020300123456Proportion withevent (%)Years of follow-upBenefit/1,000 (SE)5 (3)20 (4)35 (5)46 (5)54 (7)60 (18)Logrank P 0.0001PlaceboSimvastatin 2002 Thomson Professional Postgraduate SHPS Col
11、laborative Group. Lancet. 2002;360:7-22.ARR=absolute risk reduction; NNT=number needed to treat. 2002 Thomson Professional Postgraduate SHPS Collaborative Group. Lancet. 2002;360:7-22.HPS enrolled high-risk primary- and secondary-prevention patients.HPS. Lancet. 2002;360:7. Dow
12、ns. JAMA. 1998;279:1615.LIPID. N Engl J Med. 1998;339:1349. Sacks. N Engl J Med. 1996;335:1001. 4S. Lancet. 1995;345:1274. Shepherd. N Engl J Med. 1995;333:1301. % with CHD eventMean LDL-C level at follow-up (mg/dL)05101520253090110130150170190210CARE-RxLIPID-Rx4S-RxCARE-PILIPID-PI4S-PI2 Prevention1
13、 PreventionWOSCOPS-PIWOSCOPS-RxAFCAPS-RxAFCAPS-PIHPS-PlHPS-RxHPS-RxHPS-Plw/revasc+stroke CHD onlyPI=placebo Rx=treatment70 2002 Thomson Professional Postgraduate SDowns JR, et al. JAMA. 1998;279:1615.012345678LovastatinPlacebo 34 403539HDL-C Tertile (mg/dL)Events, % *P0.01; P=0
14、.006; P=0.05P=placebo group; Rx=treated group.Presented by HB Rubins at the 71st annual AHA Scientific Sessions; Dallas, Texas.Subjects: 2,531 menAge: 74 (avg 64) yrMean baseline LDL-C: 111 mg/dLMean baseline HDL-C: 32 mg/dLMean baseline TG: 161 mg/dLDuration: 7 yrIntervention: Gemfibrozil 600 mg bid47.5-24.5-22-21-27-10-30-25-20-15-10-50510%+*LDL-CHDL-CTGNonfatal MI/CHD deathCHDdeathAll-causemortalityStrokeBrown BG, et al. N Engl J Med. 2001;345:1521.414.3051015202589%Reduction*P .05 vs placeboPlacebo S + NAVS + N + AVPearson TA, et al. Arch Intern Med. 2000;160:459.04080P
溫馨提示
- 1. 本站所有資源如無(wú)特殊說(shuō)明,都需要本地電腦安裝OFFICE2007和PDF閱讀器。圖紙軟件為CAD,CAXA,PROE,UG,SolidWorks等.壓縮文件請(qǐng)下載最新的WinRAR軟件解壓。
- 2. 本站的文檔不包含任何第三方提供的附件圖紙等,如果需要附件,請(qǐng)聯(lián)系上傳者。文件的所有權(quán)益歸上傳用戶所有。
- 3. 本站RAR壓縮包中若帶圖紙,網(wǎng)頁(yè)內(nèi)容里面會(huì)有圖紙預(yù)覽,若沒有圖紙預(yù)覽就沒有圖紙。
- 4. 未經(jīng)權(quán)益所有人同意不得將文件中的內(nèi)容挪作商業(yè)或盈利用途。
- 5. 人人文庫(kù)網(wǎng)僅提供信息存儲(chǔ)空間,僅對(duì)用戶上傳內(nèi)容的表現(xiàn)方式做保護(hù)處理,對(duì)用戶上傳分享的文檔內(nèi)容本身不做任何修改或編輯,并不能對(duì)任何下載內(nèi)容負(fù)責(zé)。
- 6. 下載文件中如有侵權(quán)或不適當(dāng)內(nèi)容,請(qǐng)與我們聯(lián)系,我們立即糾正。
- 7. 本站不保證下載資源的準(zhǔn)確性、安全性和完整性, 同時(shí)也不承擔(dān)用戶因使用這些下載資源對(duì)自己和他人造成任何形式的傷害或損失。
最新文檔
- 二手車買賣合同中的質(zhì)保條款
- 邢臺(tái)學(xué)院《數(shù)據(jù)庫(kù)系統(tǒng)》2021-2022學(xué)年期末試卷
- 園區(qū)物業(yè)監(jiān)控管理制度
- 2024至2030年豪華干濕蒸電腦蒸汽房項(xiàng)目投資價(jià)值分析報(bào)告
- 臺(tái)灣省(2024年-2025年小學(xué)五年級(jí)語(yǔ)文)統(tǒng)編版開學(xué)考試(上學(xué)期)試卷及答案
- 2024至2030年暖風(fēng)三通項(xiàng)目投資價(jià)值分析報(bào)告
- 2024年鎖緊銷項(xiàng)目可行性研究報(bào)告
- 2024年多元素草莓專用肥項(xiàng)目可行性研究報(bào)告
- 2024年光纜自動(dòng)告警監(jiān)測(cè)系統(tǒng)項(xiàng)目可行性研究報(bào)告
- 食品加工設(shè)備購(gòu)銷合同指南
- 新生兒經(jīng)皮測(cè)黃疸課件
- 湖北省武漢市江夏區(qū)2023-2024學(xué)年七年級(jí)上學(xué)期期中數(shù)學(xué)試題
- tpm培訓(xùn)學(xué)習(xí)心得體會(huì)
- 能源托管可行性方案
- 果樹大棚養(yǎng)護(hù)技術(shù)方案
- 21我不能失信 說(shuō)課公開課一等獎(jiǎng)創(chuàng)新教案
- 電子信息技術(shù)的前沿與應(yīng)用
- 體育學(xué)數(shù)字化教學(xué)設(shè)計(jì)方案
- 后勤食堂食材供應(yīng)商考察評(píng)價(jià)流程
- 成人氣管切開拔管中國(guó)專家共識(shí)解讀
- 靜脈曲張學(xué)習(xí)課件
評(píng)論
0/150
提交評(píng)論