




版權(quán)說明:本文檔由用戶提供并上傳,收益歸屬內(nèi)容提供方,若內(nèi)容存在侵權(quán),請(qǐng)進(jìn)行舉報(bào)或認(rèn)領(lǐng)
文檔簡介
1、Uncompromising Business EthicsSourcing for GrowthCost ReductionSecure SupplyCost AvoidanceTQRDC System Introduction3M China Sourcing OperationsApril Hu5-Jan-2009BackgroundTQRDC is Vendor Performance Measurement System based on below factors: T: TECHNOLOGY Q:QUALITY R:RESPONSIVENESS D:DELIVERY C:COST
2、3M China developed local TQRDC database Since 2002.Benefits of this improved systemCan improve our vendor management efficiency;3Mers can take the initiative;Including RM/CM/Trading/indirect vendors evaluationCan send specific report to vendor Data is from Consolidate source Information centralized
3、control;Information share easily;All info can download to Excel for further edit;The interface is friendly.T: Technology 10%Prototype/Sample Capability (Critical vendor of non- trading vendor) (30%)Technical document professionalism (Critical vendor for non- trading vendor) (10%)Statistical control
4、meet 3M request ( for CM Vendor) (20%)Machine Capability( for CM Vendor) (40%)PointCriteria/Results100Meet expectation on 3M request0Not Meet expectation on 3M requestPointCriteria/Results100Meet expectation on 3M request0Not Meet expectation on 3M requestPointCriteria/Results100Meet expectation on
5、3M request0Not Meet expectation on 3M requestPointCriteria/Results100Meet expectation on 3M request0Not Meet expectation on 3M requestQ: Quality 30%Material Accepting Rate (50%)Product Quality Corrective Action and Preventive Action to vendor (30%)Quality System (20%)PointNumber of CAPA 10000=1 Case
6、 PointQuality Survey Results Quality Survey Result = 60 0=99.5%80=99%60=98.5%50=97%40=95%30=90%20=80%080%R: Responsiveness 15%PointCriteria/Results100100% or there is no CAPA(SCAR) issued0100% PointCriteria/Results100100% purchase order confirm within 3 days096% Of promise dates are met8092% Of prom
7、ise dates are met7088% Of promise dates are met6084% Of promise dates are met5080% Of promise dates are met4075% Of promise dates are met3070% Of promise dates are met2065% Of promise dates are met1060% Of promise dates are met0 = 60 days5030 days Payment Term 60 days0Payment Term 30 daysPointCriter
8、ia/Results100Meet expectation on 3M SMI request60No 3M request on SMI0Not meet expectation on 3M SMI requestPointCriteria/Results100Cost Competitive50Same as Competition0Higher than CompetitionPointCriteria/Results100Cost decrease50No Reductions/Cost avoidance0Cost increaseVendor Type Rating Differe
9、nceTQRDCTQRDCCritical RMCritical RM CM Vendor CM Vendor others othersTraderTraderT TNon-Trading Vendor 10Non-Trading Vendor 10Trading vendor 0Trading vendor 0Prototype/Sample Capability80%80%30%30%1st 1st survey survey ratingrating0 0Technical document professionalism20%20%10%10%0 0Statistical contr
10、ol0%0%20%20%0 0Machine capability0%0%40%40%0 0Q QNon-Trading Vendor 30Non-Trading Vendor 30Trader/oversea vendorTrader/oversea vendor 3030Material Accepting Rate50%50%50%50%50%50%60%60%Corrective Action and Preventive Action30%30%30%30%30%30%40%40%Quality system20%20%20%20%20%20%0%0%R RNon-Trading V
11、endor 15Non-Trading Vendor 15Trading vendor 20Trading vendor 20Timeliness of Correction Active Feedback20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%Timeliness of Purchase Order Confirm25%25%25%25%25%25%25%25%Timeliness of document receiving Confirm10%10%10%10%10%10%10%10%Communication about Product Change 15%15%15%15%15
12、%15%15%15%Product EHS & Regulation compliance30%30%30%30%30%30%30%30%D DNon-Trading Vendor 25Non-Trading Vendor 25Trading vendor 30Trading vendor 30On Time Delivery100%100%100%100%100%100%100%100%C CNon-Trading Vendor 20Non-Trading Vendor 20Trading vendor 20Trading vendor 20Payment Term 15%15%15
13、%15%15%15%15%15%SMI Implemented20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%Competitive costs 15%15%15%15%15%15%15%15%Cost reductions50%50%50%50%50%50%50%50%The web site address: http:/cnoss01/bihome/QlikView/homepage.aspx User name is default as employee number;After you get this page, please click QlikView Supply Chai
14、n TQRDC to go to the main interfaceLogin interfaceClick to view TQRDC rating documentClick to install the Plug-in before using QlikViewThis System has two parts:TQRDC For Indirect Vendor - Supplier Performance Measurement TQRDC For Direct Vendor - TQRDC Evaluation Report TQRDC Evaluation ReportSelec
15、t mark dividerSelect Year & MonthLanguageSelection fieldCondition filedTQRDC MarkFor Direct VendorSend to ExcelHelp buttonNavigatorTQRDC Evaluation Report-CNTQRDC Evaluation Report-ENHow to printSelect “TQRDC Evaluation Report”The search condition will show you four fields:Classifications;Countr
16、y;Vendor Type;Buyer code;After you enter search conditions, please select Year & Month on the top. TQRDC ConditionsClassifications; LCL-Local vendor IMP-Oversea vendorVendor Type;Vendor TypeDescriptionDTDirect TraderDCDirect CM VendorDHDirect Hard Goods vendorDRDirect RM vendorCTCritical Direct
17、TraderCCCritical Direct CM VendorCHCritical Direct Hard Goods vendorCRCritical Direct RM vendorTQRDC ConditionsBuyer codenameLocation1April HuCHJ 6002Helen NiuSZ5Mary WuXQ6Jessie WangCHJ 6007Janet TuCHJ 6008Sammy GuCHJ 600eFairy LiuXQfMay MeiCHJ 600lJulia GengGZmMaggie ZhangCHJ 600oLeosen ChenXQqFay
18、e DongCHJ 600vCharles WangJSBuyer Code Summary;Country codeCountry CodeDescriptionCountry CodeDescriptionCountry CodeDescriptionAPAsia PacificHKHong KongPHIPhilippinesARArgentinaHOLHollandPOLPolandATAustriaHUHungaryRURussiaAUSAustraliaILIsraelSA South AfricaBELBelgiumINIndiaSINSingaporeBRABrazilINDI
19、ndonesiaSPASpainCANCanadaIREIrelandSWESwedenCLChileITAItalySWISwitzerlandCNP. R. ChinaJAPJapanTHAThailandCOLColombiaKORKoreaTRTurkeyDENDenmarkMALMalaysiaTWTaiwanUREuropeMEXMexicoUKUnited KingdomFIFinlandMTMaltaUSAUSAFRAFranceNZNew ZealandVEVenezuelaGERGermanyPANPanamaVNVietnamOn Time Delivery Detail
20、sSend to ExcelOn time delivery detailsClick here, you can select 0 or 1, 0-not OT, 1- OTOn Time Delivery RatioOn time delivery ratio by year/monthClick +, get detailsSend to ExcelClick -, go back to summaryNMR DetailsSend to ExcelNMR DetailsNMR RatioNMR Ratio summaryClick +, get detailsClick -, go b
21、ack to summarySend to ExcelSurvey DetailsSend to ExcelOn Time Delivery Ratio (Trend)On Time Delivery (Trend)NMR Ratio (Trend)NMR Ratio (Trend)3Mer InitiativesBuyer have right to input “Bad Case” for- Document Receiving Confirmation- Product Change Notice- SMI ImplementedSCAR (Supplier Corrective Act
22、ion Report) can be sent to vendor by- Buyer for poor R & D performance - Quality engineer for poor product qualitySurvey mark can be input by different functions for - Prototype/Sample Capability for Critical vendor by Technical Engineer- Technical document professionalism for Critical vendor by Technical Engineer-Statistical control for CM vendor by CM Engineer- Machine Capability for CM vendor by CM Engineer - Vendor Quali
溫馨提示
- 1. 本站所有資源如無特殊說明,都需要本地電腦安裝OFFICE2007和PDF閱讀器。圖紙軟件為CAD,CAXA,PROE,UG,SolidWorks等.壓縮文件請(qǐng)下載最新的WinRAR軟件解壓。
- 2. 本站的文檔不包含任何第三方提供的附件圖紙等,如果需要附件,請(qǐng)聯(lián)系上傳者。文件的所有權(quán)益歸上傳用戶所有。
- 3. 本站RAR壓縮包中若帶圖紙,網(wǎng)頁內(nèi)容里面會(huì)有圖紙預(yù)覽,若沒有圖紙預(yù)覽就沒有圖紙。
- 4. 未經(jīng)權(quán)益所有人同意不得將文件中的內(nèi)容挪作商業(yè)或盈利用途。
- 5. 人人文庫網(wǎng)僅提供信息存儲(chǔ)空間,僅對(duì)用戶上傳內(nèi)容的表現(xiàn)方式做保護(hù)處理,對(duì)用戶上傳分享的文檔內(nèi)容本身不做任何修改或編輯,并不能對(duì)任何下載內(nèi)容負(fù)責(zé)。
- 6. 下載文件中如有侵權(quán)或不適當(dāng)內(nèi)容,請(qǐng)與我們聯(lián)系,我們立即糾正。
- 7. 本站不保證下載資源的準(zhǔn)確性、安全性和完整性, 同時(shí)也不承擔(dān)用戶因使用這些下載資源對(duì)自己和他人造成任何形式的傷害或損失。
最新文檔
- 超市玩具購銷合同協(xié)議
- 購買協(xié)議和買賣合同
- 訂房協(xié)議換購房合同模板
- 讓路協(xié)議書范本
- 購買電吹風(fēng)合同協(xié)議
- 購買加工產(chǎn)品合同協(xié)議
- b駕駛證試題及答案
- 新疆維吾爾自治區(qū)喀什地區(qū)巴楚縣2024-2025學(xué)年高二下學(xué)期4月期中地理試題(原卷版+解析版)
- 2025年跨境電商政策與實(shí)務(wù)考試試題及答案
- 2025年歷史文化研究生入學(xué)考試試題及答案
- 江蘇省南通市2024-2025學(xué)年高一上學(xué)期11月期中英語試題(無答案)
- 醫(yī)院定崗定編方案
- 保健推拿操作技術(shù)規(guī)范 第3部分:小兒DB41-T 1782.3-2019
- AIGC視域下非遺文創(chuàng)產(chǎn)品的數(shù)字化轉(zhuǎn)型升級(jí)路徑研究
- 七年級(jí)英語上冊(cè)全冊(cè)單元檢測(cè)題(附聽力材料及答案)
- -摩擦磨損試驗(yàn)機(jī)結(jié)構(gòu)設(shè)計(jì)
- 高處安裝維護(hù)拆除作業(yè)課件-改
- 2024年新高考I卷語文試題及答案
- 文化資本理論
- 增城林場(chǎng)高質(zhì)量水源林工程建設(shè)項(xiàng)目增城林場(chǎng)森林質(zhì)量優(yōu)化提升工程-中幼林撫育作業(yè)設(shè)計(jì)
- 地鐵安檢專業(yè)知識(shí)培訓(xùn)課件
評(píng)論
0/150
提交評(píng)論