英語(yǔ)考試GMATAWA模板_第1頁(yè)
英語(yǔ)考試GMATAWA模板_第2頁(yè)
英語(yǔ)考試GMATAWA模板_第3頁(yè)
英語(yǔ)考試GMATAWA模板_第4頁(yè)
英語(yǔ)考試GMATAWA模板_第5頁(yè)
已閱讀5頁(yè),還剩2頁(yè)未讀 繼續(xù)免費(fèi)閱讀

下載本文檔

版權(quán)說(shuō)明:本文檔由用戶(hù)提供并上傳,收益歸屬內(nèi)容提供方,若內(nèi)容存在侵權(quán),請(qǐng)進(jìn)行舉報(bào)或認(rèn)領(lǐng)

文檔簡(jiǎn)介

1、Argument時(shí)序性因果攻擊Firstly,theauthorisengagedinafterthis,therefore,becauseofthisreasoning.ThelineofreasoningisthatbecauseAhappenedbeforeB,theformercausedthelatter.However,thisreasoningisfallaciousunlessotherpossiblecausalfactorshavebeenconsideredandruledout.Forexample,perhapsC.Asaresult,anydecisionaimed

2、ataddressingtheproblemofBmustbebasedonamorethoroughinvestigationtogatherdatainordertonarrowdownandlocatetheactualcauseofB.同時(shí)性因果攻擊Secondly,theauthorssolutionrestsontheassumptionthatAisthecauseofBjustbecauseAcoincidedwithB.However,amerepositionalcorrelationdoesnotnecessarilyproveacausalrelationship.In

3、addition,allotherprospectivecausesofB,suchasCandD,mustberuledout.WithoutdetailedanalysisoftherealsourceofB,itwouldbegroundlesstoattributeBtoA.錯(cuò)誤類(lèi)比攻擊Additionally,itishighlydoubtfulthatstrategiesdrawnfromAareapplicabletoB.However,differencesbetweenthesetwoclearlyoutweighthesimilarities,thereforemaking

4、theanalogymuchlessvalid.Forexample,CandDallaffectAbutvirtuallyabsentinB.Accordingly,wecanseethatAandBaresodissimilarthatBisunlikelytoexperiencethesameconsequenceifitadoptsAsstrategies.4.止匕即彼攻擊Lastbutnotleast,theauthorunfairlyassumesthatareadermustmakeaeither-orchoice.However,theargumentfailstoruleou

5、tpossibilitythatadjustingAandBmightproducebetterresults.Moreover,iftheauthoriswrongintheassumptionthatAandBaretheonlycausesoftheproblem,thusthemosteffectivesolutionmightincludeacomplexofotherfactorssuchasCandD.Inanyevent,theauthorprovidesnojustificationforthemutuallyexclusivechoiceimposedonthereader

6、.必要性攻擊Inthefirstplace,theauthorunfairlyassumesthatBwasdeterminedsolelybyA.WhileAisaseeminglyimportantelementindeterminingB,itishardlytheonlyorevennecessarilyrequiredelement.ThisassumptionoverlooksothercrucialcriteriaindeterminingBsuchasC,D.Withoutaccountingforthesepotentialfactors,theauthorconcludes

7、toohastilythatisthebestwaytoachievegoals.充分性攻擊Inthesecondplace,_theauthorssolutionrestsontheassumptionthatAissufficienttogivebirthtothedesiredgoals.However,ifitturnsoutthatBisduetoacombinationoffactors,someofwhichwillremainunchangedinthefuture,suchasCandD,onlyAmighthavenoimpactonB.選擇性樣本攻擊Athresholdp

8、roblemisthattheauthorprovidesnoevidencetoclaimthatthegeneralgroupasawholeisofthesamecharacteristic.Theexamplecited,whilesuggestiveofthistrend,isinsufficienttowarrantthatthesampleisrepresentativeofthewholegroup.Forexample,Iquestionthat-Therefore,suchevidencewouldbeobviouslyunrepresentative.Infact,inf

9、aceofsuchlimitedevidence,itisfallaciousfortheauthortodrawanyconclusionatall.(與選擇性樣本攻擊”較類(lèi)似)樣本代表性攻擊Moreover,apossiblemethodologyproblemintheargumentisthatitisofbias.Thetermsomanyistoovaguetobestatisticallymeaningful.Itisverypossiblethatworkerswhoweremoreinterestedinthesurveymightbelikelytorespondtothe

10、questionnaire.Lackingintheinformationaboutthenumberofworkerssurveyedandthenumberofrespondents,itisimpossibletoassessthevalidityofthesurvey.Forinstance,if1000workersweresurveyedbutonly10responded,theresultshouldbehighlysuspect.Becausetheauthorfailstoaccountforotherinterpretations,thesurveywouldbeusel

11、essinconcludingthat.其他理由忽略他因攻擊Thirdly,theauthorhasfocusedonlyonA.Amoredetailedanalysiswouldrevealthatotherfactorsfaroutweighthefactoronwhichtheauthorfocuses.Forexample,C.Lackingamorecomprehensiveanalysisofthecauses,itispresumptuousfortheauthortoclaimthatAsolelydeterminedB.因果倒置攻擊Atlast,itispossibleth

12、attheauthorhasconfusedcausewitheffect.PerhapsAwasaresponsetoB.Sincetheauthorfailstoaccountforthispossibility,theclaimthatiscompletelyunwarranted樣本數(shù)量攻擊Anotherproblemthatseriouslyweakensthelogicofthisargumentisthatthesurveycitedisbasedontoosmallasampletobereliable.Offeredinsupportoftheargument,theonly

13、evidenceisthatUnlessitcanbeshownthatthesampleistypicalofallgeneralgroup,thefactthatisgroundlesstoclaimthatLoadedquestion和誠(chéng)實(shí)性攻擊Whatsmore,themethodologyofthesurveyisproblematicfortworeasons.Foronething,wearenotinformedwhetherthesurveyprovidedonly3alternatives.Ifitdid,therespondents,whomightverywellpre

14、feranotherchoicenotprovidedinthesurvey,mightbeforcedtogiveuptheirpreferences.Foranotherthing,wearenotinformedwhetherthesurveyresponseswereanonymousorconfidential.Therespondentsmightsupplyresponsesfavoredbytheirsuperiorswhomightconductthesurvey.Botheventswouldleadthissurveyunreliable,letalonedrawthec

15、onclusionthat樣本時(shí)效性攻擊Lastbutnotleast,anotherflawthatsignificantlyunderminesthisargumentisthattheauthorneglectstoindicatehowrecentlythesurveywasactuallyconducted.Whenusedtogenerallyclaimaparticulargroup,thesamplesshouldbecloseenoughtosupportthegeneralization,inordertopreventhistoricalchangesfrominvali

16、datingthegeneralization.Allweknowisthatthesurveyisrecentlypublished.Thelessrecentthesurveyitself,thelessreliabletheresultstodemonstratethat差異概念攻擊Tobeginwith,wemustestablishthemeaningofthevagueconceptA.IfthetermweresynonymouswithB,theevidencecitedwouldstronglysupporttheargument.However,Amaybedefinedi

17、nothertermssuchasCandD.Accordingly,theauthorhasdrawntheconclusiontoohastilyduetotheignoranceofotherdefinitionsofA.范圍內(nèi)推攻擊Whatsmore,themostegregiousreasoningerrorinthisargumentisthattheauthorusesevidencepertainingtoageneralgrouponthebasisofaparticularB.Evenifthereasoningmaybesoundingeneralsense,thepar

18、ticularsituationinwhichBisinvolvedmaynotberepresentativeoftheentiregeneralgroup.Itispossiblethat.Ifthisisthecase,theclaimthatisillfounded.不隨時(shí)變攻擊Moreover,theauthorunfairlyassumesthatAwillremainunchangedoverthenextdecades.However,amererecentone-yearAisinsufficienttoclaimthat.Statisticsfromsuchlimiteda

19、necdotalevidenceisnotagoodindicatorforthistrend.Inaddition,itispossiblethatinthefuture,thistrendwouldgreatlyfluctuateorevenreverse,thentheadoptionoftheauthorsproposalmightgivebirthtoB,however,itmightalsohaveanegativeimpactonC1and,inturns,C2.Admittedly,thisargumentwouldbeevenweakerandweakereachdayast

20、imegoesby.Issue把題目復(fù)述一下?Tosomeextent,Iagreewiththeauthorsgeneralassertionthatif*(即在作者的觀點(diǎn)上,加上一些條件,有保留地贊同).However,theauthorunnecessarilyextendsthisbroadassertiontoanirreversibleextremewhileoverlooksothercompellingfactorsthatmayaffectthisissue.Onbalance,mypointsofagreementandcontentionwiththeauthorinvo

21、lvethefundamentalanddeepanalysisasdiscussedbelow.Ontheonehand,Iwouldliketoadmitthatthisstatement,althoughsuffersfromsomeobviousdrawbacks,hassomemeritsprimarilyinsomespecialcasesinwhichtheimplicitrationalebehinditaccordswithcommonsenseandourexperienceindailylife.Hence,itispartiallyindisputable.Aftera

22、ll,.Evenif,Inotherwords.Furthermore,.Alltheseevidencedemonstratesbeyondanydoubtthat.(以上兩段要找兩個(gè)理由,來(lái)說(shuō)明作者觀點(diǎn)如何對(duì))Ontheotherhand,recognizingthatamoreapplicablechoicemustincorporatedifferentaspectsoftheissueassufficientaspossible,Ihavetopointoutthattheauthoroverstatesscomparativesignificance,andfailtotakein

23、toaccountotheressentialfactors.Inshort,thisassertionisproblematicintwoaspects.ThefirstargumenttheonethatIthinkthemostcompellingisthattheauthoroverlooked,thatistosay,.Thesecondargumentitmighthavebeennoticedbyothers-isthatinsomeoccasion,itisquitedifficultto.Accordingly,Itendtoconcedethatwhenitcomestos

24、omecertaincircumstancesitispartiallyappropriate(這里找兩個(gè)理由說(shuō)明在一些場(chǎng)合下,作者觀點(diǎn)還是不成立的,因?yàn)椴还苁裁凑擖c(diǎn),成立還是會(huì)有條件的。此段模版字?jǐn)?shù)已經(jīng)很多,你只要列出不成立的觀點(diǎn)即可,言簡(jiǎn)意賅,因?yàn)橐话愕竭@個(gè)時(shí)候,時(shí)間也不多了,容不得你寫(xiě)例子了。)Inconclusion,issueofisacomplexone,requiringsubjectivejudgment,consequently,therearenoeasyorcertainanswers.Sodifferentarethepersonalexperiencesandemot

25、ionalconcernsamongpeoplewithdiverseculturethatthousandindividualsmightholdthousandopinions.Accordingtome,把你開(kāi)頭的觀點(diǎn)copy/paste上去.GMATReading1.4種文章類(lèi)型一、新老觀點(diǎn)對(duì)比(重點(diǎn)在后)先是老觀點(diǎn):many,most,common,frequently,usually,traditionally,once,old,recently,untilrecently再是新觀點(diǎn):強(qiáng)轉(zhuǎn)折(1段中/2段首)主題句:明確的新觀點(diǎn)。二、現(xiàn)象解釋型(重點(diǎn)在后)-為什么?先是現(xiàn)象:自然科

26、學(xué):自然現(xiàn)象社會(huì)科學(xué):史實(shí)再是解釋?zhuān)航忉屧?提出多個(gè)理論+強(qiáng)調(diào)主體+評(píng)價(jià)主題句:正確的解釋三、問(wèn)題解決型:(重點(diǎn)在后)-該怎么去做?問(wèn)題:疑問(wèn)question,puzzle任務(wù)difficulty,task,problem,challenge解決/回答:多個(gè)理論+提出主題+作者評(píng)價(jià)。主題句:正確的解決方案/答案四、結(jié)論解釋型(開(kāi)門(mén)見(jiàn)山)-有哪些內(nèi)容特點(diǎn):判斷句-主題句恰恰是判斷句;解釋?zhuān)簝?nèi)容的詳細(xì)展開(kāi)2.主題題型一、對(duì)文章的中心思想、寫(xiě)作目的等提問(wèn)的題目1 .明確主題句TS2 .無(wú)TS-關(guān)鍵詞、細(xì)節(jié)、新內(nèi)容A.關(guān)鍵詞:主體動(dòng)詞Presentation:present,describe,exp

27、lain,illustrate,pointout,etc.Argumentation:evaluate,criticize,refute,challenge,counter,correct,etc.(非常實(shí)用)3 .含作者態(tài)度(少數(shù)服從多數(shù))二、結(jié)構(gòu)套路1. organization:既問(wèn)文章/段落的結(jié)構(gòu)、套路,注意順序!2. 特別套路:專(zhuān)門(mén)評(píng)述某人理論、著作,多屬于結(jié)構(gòu)解釋型,少屬于現(xiàn)象解釋?zhuān)槭裁矗?. 注意:A. 先入為主型(從前不從后):前面部分結(jié)構(gòu)已經(jīng)很完整,但后面部分說(shuō)了一大段和前面無(wú)關(guān)的離題內(nèi)容,不能受后面影響B(tài). 少數(shù)服從多數(shù)(從大不從?。篢S提出正態(tài)度,卻在末尾作出轉(zhuǎn)折說(shuō)

28、一些缺點(diǎn)、毛病,只是為了避免極端而作出的暖和語(yǔ)氣。3. 態(tài)度題就作者對(duì)某事件、某理論的態(tài)度評(píng)價(jià)提問(wèn)的題目。一邊倒評(píng)價(jià):正評(píng)價(jià)、負(fù)評(píng)價(jià)混合評(píng)價(jià):大正小負(fù)、大負(fù)小正文中判斷評(píng)價(jià)的依據(jù):判斷句系動(dòng)詞、情態(tài)動(dòng)詞、自由褒貶詞(adj,adv)1 、引號(hào):負(fù)評(píng)價(jià)2、表示評(píng)價(jià)的實(shí)義動(dòng)詞:主要用于研究類(lèi)文章(1)負(fù)評(píng)價(jià):fail(to),ignore,overlook,neglect,忽略,忽視,前一個(gè)為主觀,后兩個(gè)為客觀overestimate,underestimate,高估,低估exaggerate,夸張,夸大misrepresent,misinterpret錯(cuò)誤表達(dá),錯(cuò)誤表述,錯(cuò)誤解釋?zhuān)?)正評(píng)價(jià):s

29、how,prove,demonstrate證明find,discover,發(fā)現(xiàn)determine,confirm,確信,確認(rèn)3、讓步語(yǔ)氣讓步語(yǔ)氣的三種寫(xiě)法:前半句(1)itistrue/itiscorrect/ofcourse(2)nodoubt/withoutdoubt/undoubtedly(3)do/may/seem/appear后半句:強(qiáng)轉(zhuǎn)折以后半句為主要評(píng)價(jià)。4、從大不從小文章開(kāi)頭或主題句中的評(píng)價(jià)是大評(píng)價(jià),其他是小評(píng)價(jià)。讓步和轉(zhuǎn)折除外。4. 細(xì)節(jié)題一、四種主要類(lèi)型1. 羅馬數(shù)字題2.inorderto題型3.強(qiáng)對(duì)比取非題4.其他二、幾種常見(jiàn)的錯(cuò)誤方式三、細(xì)節(jié)定位(1)有定位的信息題:

30、of,about,concerning,regarding-關(guān)于同義變換(2)無(wú)定位的信息題:只能根據(jù)對(duì)全文的整體把握來(lái)逐個(gè)判斷選項(xiàng)。5. 類(lèi)比題典型問(wèn)法:whichofthefollowingismostsimilartothesituationinthesentence?Similarto,analogousto,parallel做法:抓住本質(zhì)特征客觀題做題要求:題型、定位、同義變換做題注意事項(xiàng)1、 4種錯(cuò)誤選項(xiàng):混、偏、反、無(wú)混:張冠李戴:A說(shuō)成B;偏:以偏蓋全;反:與原文相反;無(wú):原文沒(méi)說(shuō)/無(wú)法判斷2、 慎重對(duì)待含有最高級(jí)、唯一性和比較句的選項(xiàng)3、 不要用非出題段落的內(nèi)容來(lái)解答這個(gè)題例

31、外:?jiǎn)柲扯谓Y(jié)尾,可用下段開(kāi)頭;問(wèn)某段開(kāi)頭,可用上段結(jié)尾。4、 長(zhǎng)選項(xiàng)豎讀法縱向比較所有選項(xiàng),尤其是開(kāi)頭,找到其中相同的語(yǔ)言部分,如果某幾個(gè)選項(xiàng)中相同的語(yǔ)言部分對(duì)這個(gè)題有用,那么先看這幾個(gè)選項(xiàng)或者這幾個(gè)選項(xiàng)的差異部分。5、文字定位基本操作:讀文章的時(shí)候找出主題詞和評(píng)價(jià);文:主題題干:主題特殊情況:(1)如果題干主題在文中多處出現(xiàn),一般定位在其首次出現(xiàn)之處。(2)如果題干主題與文章主題有關(guān),定位在主題句。6. 邏輯題:(反對(duì)+支持題)(1)反對(duì)題:weaken,undermine,callintoquestion,castdoubton4種作法:A、反對(duì)原因B、反證法C、直接反對(duì)結(jié)論D、存在其他原因反對(duì)A-B時(shí)可說(shuō)A不成立。假設(shè)結(jié)論成立,推出矛盾、謬誤,與現(xiàn)實(shí)不符的情況。欲反對(duì)A-B,直接說(shuō)B不成立。欲反對(duì)A-B,可說(shuō)C-B。2)支持題:support,strengthen3種作法:A、補(bǔ)充所缺的條件。欲支持A-B,補(bǔ)上C,得C-A-B。B、把B再?gòu)?qiáng)調(diào)一遍。C、具體事例法:舉文中沒(méi)有講過(guò)的例子作為正面論據(jù)。(3)IFTRUE原則:不要懷疑5個(gè)選項(xiàng)的成立性,一切以他們的成立為前提。7. 出題點(diǎn)一、總結(jié)1. 主題:幾乎必考;2.混合評(píng)價(jià);3.強(qiáng)對(duì)

溫馨提示

  • 1. 本站所有資源如無(wú)特殊說(shuō)明,都需要本地電腦安裝OFFICE2007和PDF閱讀器。圖紙軟件為CAD,CAXA,PROE,UG,SolidWorks等.壓縮文件請(qǐng)下載最新的WinRAR軟件解壓。
  • 2. 本站的文檔不包含任何第三方提供的附件圖紙等,如果需要附件,請(qǐng)聯(lián)系上傳者。文件的所有權(quán)益歸上傳用戶(hù)所有。
  • 3. 本站RAR壓縮包中若帶圖紙,網(wǎng)頁(yè)內(nèi)容里面會(huì)有圖紙預(yù)覽,若沒(méi)有圖紙預(yù)覽就沒(méi)有圖紙。
  • 4. 未經(jīng)權(quán)益所有人同意不得將文件中的內(nèi)容挪作商業(yè)或盈利用途。
  • 5. 人人文庫(kù)網(wǎng)僅提供信息存儲(chǔ)空間,僅對(duì)用戶(hù)上傳內(nèi)容的表現(xiàn)方式做保護(hù)處理,對(duì)用戶(hù)上傳分享的文檔內(nèi)容本身不做任何修改或編輯,并不能對(duì)任何下載內(nèi)容負(fù)責(zé)。
  • 6. 下載文件中如有侵權(quán)或不適當(dāng)內(nèi)容,請(qǐng)與我們聯(lián)系,我們立即糾正。
  • 7. 本站不保證下載資源的準(zhǔn)確性、安全性和完整性, 同時(shí)也不承擔(dān)用戶(hù)因使用這些下載資源對(duì)自己和他人造成任何形式的傷害或損失。

最新文檔

評(píng)論

0/150

提交評(píng)論